DOCSLIB.ORG

Best History Museums in Moscow"

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Best History Museums in Moscow "Best History Museums in Moscow" Realizado por : Cityseeker 5 Ubicaciones indicadas State Historical Museum "Russia Through the Ages" It is impossible to miss this museum, given that it sits right on Red Square. At the entrance, there's always someone dressed as Ivan the Terrible or Lenin, for those looking for a photograph. The museum opened its doors to the public in 1883 and recognized as Russia's largest museum as it houses artifacts that are over a hundred years old. Inside, there are by Marcin Konsek various exhibitions dedicated to the sweeping richness of Russian history, from mammoth tusks and bronze age relics to the posters dating back to the Soviet-era. +7 495 692 3731 www.shm.ru/ [email protected] Red Square 1, Moscú Romanov Boyar House in Zariadie "Typical 17th-Century Boyar Home" According to legend, the first Tsar of the Romanov dynasty (Mikhail Fedorovich) was born here on July 12, 1596. This 16th-century estate belonged to his grandfather, Nikita Romanov. After numerous repairs and reconstructions, the chambers became a good example of a typical 17th- century boyar home. In 1932 the museum became a branch of the State by Alvesgaspar Historical Museum. The chambers' interior illustrates the life of boyars during the 17th Century. The exhibition shows the best pieces of applied and folk arts from the funds of the State Historical Museum. +7 495 698 1256 www.shm.ru/romanovy.html Varvarka Ulitsa 10, Moscú Pushkin Museum on the Arbat "The Residence of Alexander Pushkin" This two-story 19th-century house is a very interesting place for those who would like to know more about Russia's great poet Alexander Pushkin and about the city life at the time. This house was a very significant part of Pushkin's life. He married the beautiful Natalia Goncharova and he spent the first three months of his married life here. The museum has many by MartinPutz portraits of Pushkin and his friends, numerous engravings of 19th-century Moscow and copies of Pushkin's handwriting. A beautiful statue of Pushkin and his wife stands in front of the museum. +7 495 201 5674 Arbat Ulitsa 53, Moscú by A.Savin (Wikimedia Commons · WikiPhotoSpace) Central Armed Forces Museum "Military Artifacts Here" Russia has been one of the world's great military powers for centuries now, and hence the Central Armed Forces Museum museum draws on a rich fund of history. Their stocks include 800,000 military and historical items, presented across 24 galleries. The exhibits are dedicated to the most important events of Russian history and illustrate the Russian Civil War, pre and post World War II and the development of the Soviet military machine. The museum organizes guided tours that cover topics such as the Moscow, Stalingrad and Kursk battles. There is also an exhibit of military technologies. +7 495 681 6303 www.cmaf.ru/ [email protected] Ulitsa Sovietskoy Armii 2, Moscú Jewish Museum and Tolerance Center "Discover Jewish History" The museum was established in the year 2012 in the historic building of the Bakhmetevsky Bus Garage. The main goal of this museum is to create an interactive platform between different cultures. The center was designed by Ralph Appelbaum Associates, and has been divided into 12 by Alvesgaspar galleries, exhibiting high-tech displays on various subjects. The galleries bring to life, the life of Russian Jews in the 19th century, and on display are old photographs and letters, an interesting 3-D movie on Jewish beliefs, a short film about Russian Jews during the holocaust and the battle of World War II. The Tolerance Center imparts in children values of tolerance, respect and mutual understanding. The museum is large, and can accommodate a large crowd, and has a museum shop, cafe, lecture hall and internet service. +7 495 645 0550 www.jewish- [email protected] Obraztsova Ulitsa 11/1, museum.ru/en/ Moscú UNIRSE A NOSOTROS A: cityseeker.com Condiciones generales | POLíTICA DE PRIVACIDAD | API | PóNGASE EN CONTACTO CON NOSOTROS | Derechos de autor 2020 CITYSEEKER Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Art and Power in Putin's Russia
    RUSSIA Art and Power in Putin’s Russia BY SASHA PEVAK The separation between art and power in Russia’s recent history has never been clear-cut. Soon after the fall of the USSR, contemporary art, namely actionism in the 90s, openly criticized society and entered the political sphere. This trend continued after Vladimir Putin’s election in 2000. Russian identity politics in the 2000s were based on four pillars: state nationalism with the Putin’s “power vertical”, the vision of Russia as a nation-state, Orthodox religion, and the myth of the Unique Russian Path, reinforced by the notion of “sovereign democracy” and the idea of the omnipresence of a fifth column inside the country 1. The will to consolidate society around these values provoked, according to political scientist Lena Jonson, tensions between the State and culture, especially as far as religious issues were concerned. These issues were the cause of the trials against the exhibitions “Attention! Religion” (2003) and “Forbidden Art – 2006” (2007), shown in Moscow at the Andrei Sakharov Museum and Public Centre. The latter staged temporary events and activities based on the defence of Human Rights. For part of the national opinion, the Centre symbolized democracy in Russia, whereas for others it represented an antipatriotic element, all the more so because it was financed by foreign foundations. In 2014, the Department of Justice catalogued it as a “foreign agent,” on the pretext that it carried out political actions with American subsidies 2. In 2003, the exhibition “Caution, Religion!”, organized by Aroutioun Zouloumian, was vandalized by religious activists several days after the opening 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Випперовские Чтения» «Классика И Современность. Отражения» 26–28 Февраля 2018 Года
    МЕЖДУНАРОДНАЯ НАУЧНАЯ КОНФЕРЕНЦИЯ «ВИППЕРОВСКИЕ ЧТЕНИЯ» «КЛАССИКА И СОВРЕМЕННОСТЬ. ОТРАЖЕНИЯ» 26–28 февраля 2018 года INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH VIPPER CONFERENCE “CLASSICS AND CONTEMPORANEITY. REFLECTIONS” 26–28 February, 2018 1 ПРОГРАММА феноменов искусства, наделенных статусом «классиче- with the Apollon journal came up with the specific dis- interventions, contemporary museum increasingly ских». Будут проанализированы разные формы диалога course, which, by appealing to the museum categories, prefers extra- systematic and extra-historical caram- PROGRAM с искусством прошлого, с его классическими образцами, made the impressionist and post- impressionist painting bolage (J.-H. Martin) view that assumes the maximum их творческий потенциал, функции и цели, границы их acceptable by the educated public. The problem was set scope of associations, comparisons, and interpreta- 26 ФЕВРАЛЯ, ПОНЕДЕЛЬНИК смыслообразующих и формообразующих возможностей. again after the October, when in 1918–1920 the Moscow tions. At the same time, different museums, such as ГЛАВНОЕ ЗДАНИЕ ГМИИ им. А.С. ПУШКИНА, Krasimira Lukitcheva (Russia) museum community proposed a number of alternative Louvre, Versaille, Prado, Villa Borghese, demonstrate (ул. Волхонка, д. 12) ЗАЛ 30 INTERPRETING THE CLASSICAL HERITAGE IN THEORY concepts of the new museum, where modern French art various strategies of work with contemporary mate- 26 FEBRUARY, MONDAY AND PRACTICE OF ART OF THE SECOND HALF OF THE was once again the central point of discussion (Museum rial. Evaluation of the pros and cons of international HALL 30, THE MAIN BUILDING OF THE PUSHKIN 20th — BEGINNING OF THE 21st CENTURY of Artistic Culture, Museums of the New Western Art, experience is one of the pressing problems in creating STATE MUSEUM (12, VOLKHONKA STREET) The talk will address the complex and tense context Pavel Muratov’s project of reorganization of the Muse- the concept of the 21st century museum.
    [Show full text]
  • Edge of a Pine Forest Signed in Cyrillic and Dated ‘1884’ (Lower Right) Graphite and Charcoal on Paper 32.5 X 46.5 Cm (12¾ X 18¼ In)
    Ivan Ivanovich Shishkin (Elabuga 1832 - St. Petersburg 1898) Edge of a Pine Forest signed in Cyrillic and dated ‘1884’ (lower right) graphite and charcoal on paper 32.5 x 46.5 cm (12¾ x 18¼ in) Edge of a Pine Forest is an excellent example of Ivan Ivanovich Shishkin’s later depictions of forests. The naturalistic treatment and glimpses of unfolding vistas are characteristic of his style during the 1880s. Shishkin considered drawing to be an important branch of art. At this time the lines in his drawings are elastic and mobile, sometimes flowing, light and wavy, whilst at other times resilient and strong. He uses black lead in a light, free style but his pencil strokes are more animated and varied. Shishkin used a combination of pencil, charcoal, graphite and white chalk, which allowed him to achieve softer effects and a finer gradation of tone. Over forty years of artistic activity, Shishkin produced hundreds of paintings, numerous studies and drawings, and a large number of engravings. Many of these concerned forests and trees. An oil painting created a few years after the drawing, Forest in Mordvinovo (1891, State Museum and Exhibition Centre ROSIZO, Moscow), illustrates Shishkin’s use of an alternative medium to treat the same subject. Shishkin considered studies to be an integral part of the creative process, based on continual observation and reflection. The resulting level of detail does not detract from the unity of the picture, but contributes to a carefully thought out composition and the harmonious use of light colours. The present drawing was executed by Shishkin specifically for a project to demonstrate the potential of photogravure as a printing method.
    [Show full text]
  • The International Conference «Libraries
    INSPEL 33(1999)4, pp. 185-189 THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE «LIBRARIES IN THE MUSEUMS - MUSEUMS IN THE LIBRARIES» AND THE 2-ND ANNUAL MEETING OF THE IFLA INTERNATIONAL ART DOCUMENTATION ADVISORY GROUP 15 - 23 MAY 1999, MOSCOW - ST.PETERSBURG. By Olga Sinitsyna In May 1999 a significant international conference was organised in Moscow by ARLIS/Mos with the generous financial support of the ”Open Society” Institute (George Soros Foundation). The conference brought together about 150 participants from more than 20 Russian cities and more than 60 institutions. The organisers were honoured to host the international group of distinguished professionals in art librarianship from Australia, Denmark, Portugal, the UK, and the USA. It was the first conference of such a scale, devoted to specific problems of the art and particularly, museum libraries. The conference attracted not only the art librarians, but art historians, museum curators, administrators, managers, publishers, producers of the electronic products and others. The organisers did their best to draw attention of the museum directors and librarians from all over Russia. They collaborated with the Ministry of Culture of Russian Federation, ICOM, mass media and local government. Conference sites The Conference was hosted by the Pushkin Museum of Fine Arts, State Tretyakov Gallery and M. I. Rudomino Library for Foreign Literature in Moscow and a post- conference round table will took place in St. Petersburg at the Hermitage library, bringing together more local museum librarians. Objectives The museum libraries even in the most favourable situation are scarcely regarded by the museum administration as one of the most important division within the museum structure.
    [Show full text]
  • MOSCOW CITYPASS: MUSEUMS • the Moscow Kremlin • State
    MOSCOW CITYPASS: MUSEUMS • The Moscow Kremlin • State Historical Museum (main building) • Museum of the Patriotic War of 1812 • State Tretyakov Gallery • State Tretyakov Gallery on Krymsky Val • St. Basil’s Cathedral (Pokrovsky Cathedral) • Underground Museum in the park “Zaryadye” • Shilov Art Gallery • Artcentre. Moscow • Lumiere Brothers Center for Photography • Schusev State Museum of Architecture • Mosquarium (VDNH) • Historical Park “Russia — my history” (VDNH) • House-museum of Pushkin on Staraya Basmannaya • Jewish Museum and Tolerance Center • Bunker-42 (The Cold War Museum) • Moscow Transport Museum • State Pushkin Museum • Pushkin Memorial Apartment on Arbat Street • Memorial Apartment of Andrey Bely • Mikhail Bulgakov Museum • Bulgakov's House Museum-Theatre • Liublino Estate • Tsaritsyno Museum-Reserve • Kolomenskoye Museum-Reserve • Palace of the Tsar Alexey Mikhailovich in Kolomenskoye • Izmailovo Estate • Vodka History Museum (The Kremlin in Izmailovo) • Museum of Bread (The Kremlin in Izmailovo) • Weapons Museum (The Kremlin in Izmailovo) • The Living Museum of Folk Arts (The Kremlin in Izmailovo) • World History in plasticine (The Kremlin in Izmailovo) • Museum of Soviet Arcade Machines • Experimentanium Science Museum • Paleontological Museum • Museum of Contemporary History of Russia • “Presnya” • Museum of Underground Printing Press (1905-1906) • Institute of Russian Realist Art • Museum of Russian Icon MOSCOW CITYPASS: TOURS AND ENTERTAINMENT • Radisson Royal Flotilla river-cruise • Moscow City Sightseeing Bus trip • Skating ring "Megaice" • “Zaryadye” Sightseeing Tour • Observation Deck of the Hotel Ukraine • PANORAMA360 Observation deck • Walking Tour with Moscow Free Tour • Moscow Cable Car on Sparrow Hill • Bunker 42 (The Cold War Museum) • Moscow Cathedral Mosque • Russian Folk Show “Golden Ring” MOSCOW CITYPASS: DISCOUNTS AND PRIVILEGES • Discounts on a bicycle rental • Discounts on a taxi • Discounts in restaurants and bars • Discounts in boutiques • Unlimited calls and Internet access .
    [Show full text]
  • Everybody Is Present
    OCTOBER 1425 IV International Festival of Inclusion The Pushkin State Museum of Fine Arts EVERYBODY IS PRESENT Now that everyone's presence in the online museum space has reached a quorum, we suggest talking about equality and its illusion, hyperlocality and digital freedom, the "theatricality" of everyday life and rethinking one's own boundaries. 'Everybody Is Present' is the theme of the IV International Inclusive Festival at the Pushkin Museum. The festival has been held at the Pushkin State Museum of Fine Arts every year since 2017, raising questions about the representation of people from socially excluded groups and the participatory possibilities of museum projects. This year everyone was able to experience social exclusion and the lack of emotional and bodily contact with the real world. The threat of the pandemic has changed the formats of cultural projects and the way they interact with the audience; it has equalised the opportunities for those who can move, see and communicate freely with those who are deprived of such opportunities. Meeting in a single digital space creates new communication challenges. For the first time, the festival is accompanied by a special theatre programme. The events in various formats included in the programme will help to analyse how experiences of isolation have allowed all of us to experience sensory, temporal and communicative notions of ourselves and the world in which we live in a new way, and to realise the changes this will bring. Thus, the specific physicality of being confined in a small space and limited mobility will be the focus of all public events, from inclusive movement training to social theatre.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Pushkin Was a Live Volcano . . .'
    Click here for Full Issue of Fidelio Volume 8, Number 3, Fall 1999 ‘Pushkin Was a Live Volcano...’ The Poet, As Seen by His Contemporaries by E.S. Lebedeva Pushkin was a live volcano, whose collaboration, chance meetings on inner life burst from him like the post roads, or in some Cos- a column of fire. sack settlement, or on the Geor- —F. Glinka (I, 245)1 gian Military Highway. People of different levels of culture gave Poetry is the exclusive passion of those testimony about him, and there is few, who are born poets. a great range of variety in how —A.S. Pushkin they perceived the personality of the poet: from tender solicitude at ushkin lived his life in a big the sight of a missing button on and noisy crowd—not in his jacket, to amazement at the Pisolation, but surrounded by scope of the phenomenon that many people who had the opportu- was Pushkin. nity to see him. We can hear the All social layers are represent- chorus of his contemporaries, with ed on the list of people who have its great range of voices, in their said what they had to say about reminiscences about him. the poet—from the Emperor to These memoirs have a certain the serf, from the fashionable for- peculiar feature. The people closest tune-teller to the old Cossack to the poet found it difficult to Manuscript sketch, 1820, self-portrait (lower left) woman, who remembered speak, and they did not do so right with members of the Rayevsky family.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Previously Published Works
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Previously Published Works Title 'The Final Struggle': The Art of the Soviet Death Mask Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6gc654pr Author Neumeyer, Joy Publication Date 2015-07-01 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California ‘The Final Struggle’: The Art of the Soviet Death Mask Joy Neumeyer Summer 2015 Joy Neumeyer is a graduate student in the Department of History at the University of California, Berkeley. ‘The Final Struggle’: The Art of the Soviet Death Mask “Death is a highly mediocre portraitist.” -Johann Wolfgang von Goethe1 The sculptor Sergei Merkurov was working late one night in his Moscow studio, bundled in furs against the winter cold, when the phone rang. The voice on the other end informed him that he was being sent on a secret assignment. A car pulled up, and two secret policemen in leather jackets emerged to push him inside. Merkurov still did not know where he was going as they exited a motor coach outside Moscow and climbed into a horse-drawn sleigh. It was January 24, 1924, and Vladimir Lenin, the leader of the Revolution, lay dead at his estate. Inside, the mirrors were shrouded in black cloth, in keeping with the belief that the dead man’s spirit can use them to return and claim the living. Merkurov was ushered to the table where the leader’s body lay under bright lights. “It was like a dream,” he later wrote. Lenin’s widow, Nadezhda Krupskaia, approached the sculptor. “You were supposed to sculpt Lenin’s bust,” she whispered.
    [Show full text]
  • 2Nd International Conference РЕШИТЕЛЬНЫЙ МУЗЕЙ The
    2nd International Conference РЕШИТЕЛЬНЫЙ МУЗЕЙ The Reflexive Museum: Responsive Spaces for Publics, Ideas, and Art 20 – 21 March 2014 What is a 21st century museum of contemporary art? The Reflexive Museum: Responsive Spaces for Publics, Ideas, and Art will reflect on what it means to build a responsive institution focusing on current debates around notions of the public, the museum as a repository of experience, and the development of cultural spaces as laboratories for art production and creative thinking. The conference will explore historical precedents, as well as the rising phenomena of privately-funded, publicly-driven institutions that are changing the face of museum culture worldwide. Over two days, leading museum directors, curators, and art historians from around the world will share their perspectives through lectures, panel discussions, and case studies. Derived from Ancient Greek, the term ‘museum’ originally referred to a temple dedicated to the Muses. In more recent times, it has been used and construed differently in contemporary cultures to reflect a range of diverse practices. In Russian, however, the word ‘museum’ remains most often associated with the sole function of historic conservation, and unlike current European and American traditions, the Museum is described as ‘influential’ rather than ‘friendly’ and ‘responsive’; ‘reserved’ rather than ‘dynamic’ and ‘reflexive’. Finding a native equivalent to the adjectives ‘reflexive’ and ‘responsive’ in the in the conference’s title therefore proved challenging. Thus, for its Russian title, Garage has used the epithet ‘resolute’ to underscore the conference’s goals: first, to invite the Russian museum community to learn about the many possibilities for progress and development, and second, to act in accordance with the legacy of the Russian avant-garde artists, who created the first revolutionary model for a museum “intended to collect all kinds of existing art undergoing a change and designed to exert influence on life using it” (Kazimir Malevich, The Museum of Artistic Culture).
    [Show full text]
  • Fun Facts Outline-Goldfish 1912
    Goldfish 1912 by Henry Matisse Print Facts • Medium: Oil on canvas • Date: 1911 • Size: 140 x 95 cm • Location: Pushkin Museum, Moscow, Russia • Style: Fauvism • Genre: Still Life • The Goldfish is a painting that shows Matisse's extraordinary talent for creating paintings which make great use of color. It is an example of Fauvism – a movement that Matisse himself made popular. • The background is a rainbow of different colors, which are bright and warm in the top section and dark and cold in the lower part of the painting. • The four goldfish in the glass, which are the focus of the painting, are a bright and brilliant orange. • They are surrounded by a whole host of bright plants and Matisse makes excellent use of the water to reflect the colors and brighten the picture further. Artist Facts • Born December 31, 1869 in Le Cateau-Cambrésis, Nord, France • Died November 3, 1954 (age 84) • Born Henri-Émile-Benoît Matisse in France, he was the first son of parents who owned a seed business (some call it a flower business). • In 1887 he went to Paris to study law and later worked as a court administrator. • He first started to paint in 1889 (20 years old), after his mother brought him art supplies during a period of convalescence following an attack of appendicitis. He discovered “a kind of paradise” as he later described it, and decided to become an artist. His father was deeply disappointed. • In 1891 he went to Paris to study art and initially he painted still-lifes and landscapes in the traditional Flemish style.
    [Show full text]
  • And Post-Soviet Literature and Culture
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2017 Russia Eternal: Recalling The Imperial Era In Late- And Post-Soviet Literature And Culture Pavel Khazanov University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Eastern European Studies Commons, English Language and Literature Commons, European History Commons, and the European Languages and Societies Commons Recommended Citation Khazanov, Pavel, "Russia Eternal: Recalling The Imperial Era In Late- And Post-Soviet Literature And Culture" (2017). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2894. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2894 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2894 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Russia Eternal: Recalling The Imperial Era In Late- And Post-Soviet Literature And Culture Abstract The return of Tsarist buildings, narratives and symbols has been a prominent facet of social life in post- Soviet Russia. My dissertation aims to explain this phenomenon and its meaning by tracking contemporary Russia’s cultural memory of the Imperial era. By close-reading both popular and influential cultural texts, as well as analyzing their conditions of production and reception, I show how three generations of Russian cultural elites from the 1950s until today have used Russia’s past to fight present- day political battles, and outline how the cultural memory of the Imperial epoch continues to inform post- Soviet Russian leaders and their mainstream detractors. Chapters One and Two situate the origin of Russian culture’s current engagement with the pre-Revolutionary era in the social dynamic following Stalin’s death in 1953.
    [Show full text]
  • The Representation of American Visual Art in the USSR During the Cold War (1950S to the Late 1960S) by Kirill Chunikhin
    The Representation of American Visual Art in the USSR during the Cold War (1950s to the late 1960s) by Kirill Chunikhin a Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History and Theory of Arts Approved Dissertation Committee _______________________________ Prof. Dr. Isabel Wünsche Jacobs University, Bremen Prof. Dr. Corinna Unger European University Institute, Florence Prof. Dr. Roman Grigoryev The State Hermitage, St. Petersburg Date of Defense: June 30, 2016 Table of Contents Abstract ...................................................................................................................... v Acknowledgements ................................................................................................. vii Statutory Declaration (on Authorship of a Dissertation) ........................................... ix List of Figures ............................................................................................................ x List of Attachments ................................................................................................. xiv Introduction ................................................................................................................ 1 PART I. THE SOVIET APPROACH: MAKING AMERICAN ART ANTI- AMERICAN………………………………………………………………………………..11 Chapter 1. Introduction to the Totalitarian Art Discourse: Politics and Aesthetics in the Soviet Union ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]