Reviews of Books and Software

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Reviews of Books and Software Reviews of Books and Software model and clarify the seemingly simple Computers have the capacity to assist Book Reviews techniques described in the book. For in­ health care providers in managing infor­ Len Scarpinato, DO, Section Editor stance, I recently demonstrated the use of mation. One such potential is the storage a scaling question with a patient. “ On a of findings, such as symptoms, signs, and (instructive Therapies. William J. Hoyt, scale of 1 to 10, with 1 being no pain and ancillary test data, and the ability to pro­ PhD (ed). Guilford Press, New York, NY, 10 being excruciating pain, how would duce differential diagnoses from combi­ 1994, 340 pp, $35.00. ISBN 0-89862- you rate your back pain?” The resident I nations of the findings. Ideally, using a 094-5. was working with found that question database model, users should be able to In this age of managed care, increasing very useful. Scaling gave the patient a way generate a differential diagnosis for a spe­ emphasis is being directed toward lower­ to express her pain using numbers. cific patient, create differential diagnoses ing health care costs and providing brief, I recommend this book to family for a specific finding, and view the data­ effective services. The field of psychother­ physicians who have the desire, experi­ base’s list of findings for a specific disease. apy is no exception. In Constructive Ther- ence, and personal insight required to ef­ For a dermatology program, for example, tfies, William F. Hoyt has collected writ­ fectively deal with affect in patients and users should be able to determine all pap­ ings from prominent leaders in the field, themselves. For example, the patient may ulosquamous lesions in the database, or who discuss their ideas about a “ new di­ describe her pain as a “ 7” and burst into all papular lesions associated with pruritus tears. rection” in psychotherapy. They suggest and fever. Perhaps the best use of this book is a shift in thinking that “ focuses more on wDIAG is a Microsoft Windows pro­ by family physicians interested in keeping the strengths and resources that patients gram for differential diagnoses of derma­ their fingers on the pulse of the current bring to the enterprise than on their tologic conditions; a DOS version is also trends in the psychotherapy field. Al­ weaknesses or limitations. Similarly, more available. A cover letter accompanying though the constructivist model is cer­ wDIAG indicates that it was developed emphasis is put on where people want to tainly not the only model in the field of go than on where they have been.” “ by doctors for doctors,” and that “ sales psychotherapy, family physicians who of this software are being used to finance There are many names used to de­ read this book will be well acquainted scribe this emerging model. Family phy­ the further development of diagnostic with one of the more popular models in programs for use by general practition­ sicians should take note of the following the field today. terms especially when referring their pa­ ers.” tients to mental health clinicians who use Eric L. Weiner, PhD, MSW Using the Windows File-Run com­ this model: solution-focused, solution- St Mary’s Family Practice Center mand, wDIAG installs smoothly and cre­ oriented, narrative, competency-based, Milwaukee, Wisconsin ates an icon. It occupies 651KB hard-disk constructivist, possibility therapy, solu­ space. I encountered no technical diffi­ tion talk, and restorying. Although differ­ culties in testing wDIAG on a 486 25- ences exist between them, all share a com­ mHz laptop with a gray-scale VGA mon ground to develop “ a respectful Software Reviews screen. Once invoked, wDIAG loaded in partnership between therapist and client, Gary N. Fox, MD, Section Editor 10 seconds, including passing through an emphasis on strengths and resources, compulsory screens. and a hopeful eye toward the future.” wDIAG: Computer Assisted Diagnosis of wDIAG’s main screen consists of a Constructive Therapies will give the Skin Disease (1993). Intercept Press Ltd, menu bar across the top with four choices reader clear insight into the solution- 23 Peveril Hill Rd South, Toronto, On­ for drop-down menus: Inquiry, Diagno­ oriented model. There are numerous case tario, Canada M6C 3A7 (416-785- sis, Disease Rules, and Patient Files, all examples, including applications for drug 3611). $75, DOS version; $100, Win­ accessible by mouse or keyboard. All di­ and alcohol abuse, eating disorders, toilet dows. agnostic inquiry is patient-based. From training, severe sexual abuse, marital dif­ documentation: 21-page, 8.5 X 11-in. the Inquiry-Create menu option, ficulties, and smoking cessation. black-and-white, photocopied manual wDIAG’s. process begins with a forced As a behavioral scientist with family with numerous screen prints for illustra­ sequence of patient name, age, tempera­ therapy training, I enjoyed reading this tion. ture, and sex; and the eruption’s duration book and understood the terminology. how supplied: 1 high density 3.5-in. dis­ (7 choices), course (6 choices), extent However, this book targets experienced kette. (generalized, regional, singular), and so mental health practitioners rather than MINIMUM HARDWARE REQUIREMENTS: DOS on. Once all required data is entered, family physicians. version: IBM PC-compatible with 640KB wDIAG may present a series of questions, I recommend this book for two spe- RAM; Windows version requires Win­ such as whether there are annular lesions cific audiences: behavioral scientists dows 3.1. Although DOS version can be or known exposure to chicken pox. Once working with residents who consult with run from a floppy drive on a 286 machine, data gathering is complete, the user must practicing family physicians, and well- 486 66-MHz PC recommended for sat­ actively select the Diagnosis section to trained family physicians with Level 3 isfactory response times. obtain wDIAG’s primary diagnosis and skills. (Doherty WJ, Baird MA. Develop­ mouse support: For Windows version. differential diagnostic possibilities, along mental levels in family-centered medical toll-free customer support: N o. with their ranking based on a possible "re. Bam Med 1986; 18:153-6). demonstration disks: None indicated. score of 1000. Coaching from a behavioral scientist money-back guarantee: None specified. During data entry, some screens al­ °r related consultant is important to rating: Marginal. low return to previous screens, but this The Journal of Family Practice, Vol. 41, No. 3($ep), 1995 299 Book Reviews mend it for anything other than expand- ing a differential. There are physicians,es­ If you wish to: pecially academicians, who may find the program useful for this purpose, but ] would recommend purchase only with a money-back guarantee. I would suggest the authors consider marketing wDUd as shareware (“ try before you buy”). Gary N. Fox, MB Toledo, Okii Use the <t> and <I> keys to choose line, then press <Beturn> key. <Fl>Restart diagnosis <F2>Preoious frame <F3>hain menu ClinDerm, Version 3.00 (1994), Expert Class Computing, Inc, PO Box 261 Michigan City, IN 46360 (219-874 8981). $295 + $7.50 shipping & han­ dling. Figure. Screen showing checklist with brief explanation of terms. documentation: Fourteen 8.5 X 11-in, photocopied pages, unillustrated. feature is not fully implemented. There Adenoma sebaceum was also listed (50 how supplied: One 720K 3.5-in. « are few unnecessary key strokes. Users points). 5.25-in diskette. cannot elect to stop and “ see” wDIAG's Evaluating wDIAG, I felt users MINIMUM HARDWARE REQUIREMENTS: IBS! diagnostic considerations until all data are should have better access to the differen­ PC-compatible with 256KB RAM, any entered. Additionally, there is no feature tial diagnosis of an individual or set of version of DOS; hard drive or one 3.5-in, allowing listing of diagnoses meeting lim­ findings, better ability to access differen­ floppy drive or two 5-in. floppy drives. ited specified criteria, such as all papulo­ tial diagnoses anywhere along the clinical mouse support: No. squamous listings; users must provide all path, and, in the era of scrolling list boxes, TOLL-FREE CUSTOMER SUPPORT: No. required entries. Among the better fea­ a better interface for accessing previous demonstration disks: Not specified. tures of wDIAG are some checklists with patients and disease rules. In a well- money-back guarantee: None specified. good, brief explanations of terms (Fig­ designed program, users should be un­ RATING: Good. ure). wDIAG allows users to choose any aware that intermediary numbers exist. The rationale and ideal functionality of of the diseases it contains and view the set For wDIAG's questions, users must click software for differential diagnoses of der­ of logic “ rules” used to arrive at the di­ on “ Yes” or “ No” on opposite ends of matologic conditions, as well as another agnosis. the screen, which is an inconvenience. product (Windows DIAG [ivDIAG]), wDIAG's patient-specific data are Users should not have to request the dif­ have been described in the preceding stored as consecutively numbered patient ferential diagnosis as a separate step. Less software review. records. To review or modify a patient’s common illnesses, especially those associ­ Clin derm is a DOS-based program findings, users must first determine the ated with substantial morbidity, should for differential dermatologic diagnoses. patient’s number, then re-access menus be included in the database. The obliga­ The program may be run from floppy to enter the patient’s number. Similarly, tory storing of patient profiles, a nice op­ disks or from the hard drive by creating! to find wDIAG’s rules for a disease, the tion, is generally unnecessary for primary directory and copying the Clinderm files user must first look up the disease in the care use. Disappointingly, windows func­ to it.
Recommended publications
  • ICD-10-CM TABULAR LIST of DISEASES and INJURIES 2018 Addenda No Change Chapter 1 No Change Certain Infectious and Parasitic Diseases (A00-B99)
    ICD-10-CM TABULAR LIST of DISEASES and INJURIES 2018 Addenda No Change Chapter 1 No Change Certain infectious and parasitic diseases (A00-B99) No Change Intestinal infectious diseases (A00-A09) No Change A04 Other bacterial intestinal infections No Change A04.7 Enterocolitis due to Clostridium difficile Add A04.71 Enterocolitis due to Clostridium difficile, recurrent Add A04.72 Enterocolitis due to Clostridium difficile, not specified as recurrent No Change A05 Other bacterial foodborne intoxications, not elsewhere classified No Change Excludes1: Revise from Clostridium difficile foodborne intoxication and infection (A04.7) Revise to Clostridium difficile foodborne intoxication and infection (A04.7-) No Change Helminthiases (B65-B83) No Change B81 Other intestinal helminthiases, not elsewhere classified No Change Excludes1: Revise from angiostrongyliasis due to Parastrongylus cantonensis (B83.2) Revise to angiostrongyliasis due to: Add Angiostrongylus cantonensis (B83.2) Add Parastrongylus cantonensis (B83.2) No Change B81.3 Intestinal angiostrongyliasis Revise from Angiostrongyliasis due to Parastrongylus costaricensis Revise to Angiostrongyliasis due to: Add Angiostrongylus costaricensis Add Parastrongylus costaricensis No Change Chapter 2 No Change Neoplasms (C00-D49) No Change Malignant neoplasms of ill-defined, other secondary and unspecified sites (C76-C80) No Change C79 Secondary malignant neoplasm of other and unspecified sites Delete Excludes2: lymph node metastases (C77.0) No Change C79.1 Secondary malignant neoplasm of bladder
    [Show full text]
  • Urticaria from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Jump To: Navigation, Search "Hives" Redirects Here
    Urticaria From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search "Hives" redirects here. For other uses, see Hive. Urticaria Classification and external resourcesICD-10L50.ICD- 9708DiseasesDB13606MedlinePlus000845eMedicineemerg/628 MeSHD014581Urtic aria (or hives) is a skin condition, commonly caused by an allergic reaction, that is characterized by raised red skin wheals (welts). It is also known as nettle rash or uredo. Wheals from urticaria can appear anywhere on the body, including the face, lips, tongue, throat, and ears. The wheals may vary in size from about 5 mm (0.2 inches) in diameter to the size of a dinner plate; they typically itch severely, sting, or burn, and often have a pale border. Urticaria is generally caused by direct contact with an allergenic substance, or an immune response to food or some other allergen, but can also appear for other reasons, notably emotional stress. The rash can be triggered by quite innocent events, such as mere rubbing or exposure to cold. Contents [hide] * 1 Pathophysiology * 2 Differential diagnosis * 3 Types * 4 Related conditions * 5 Treatment and management o 5.1 Histamine antagonists o 5.2 Other o 5.3 Dietary * 6 See also * 7 References * 8 External links [edit] Pathophysiology Allergic urticaria on the shin induced by an antibiotic The skin lesions of urticarial disease are caused by an inflammatory reaction in the skin, causing leakage of capillaries in the dermis, and resulting in an edema which persists until the interstitial fluid is absorbed into the surrounding cells. Urticarial disease is thought to be caused by the release of histamine and other mediators of inflammation (cytokines) from cells in the skin.
    [Show full text]
  • Eye Disease 1 Eye Disease
    Eye disease 1 Eye disease Eye disease Classification and external resources [1] MeSH D005128 This is a partial list of human eye diseases and disorders. The World Health Organisation publishes a classification of known diseases and injuries called the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems or ICD-10. This list uses that classification. H00-H59 Diseases of the eye and adnexa H00-H06 Disorders of eyelid, lacrimal system and orbit • (H00.0) Hordeolum ("stye" or "sty") — a bacterial infection of sebaceous glands of eyelashes • (H00.1) Chalazion — a cyst in the eyelid (usually upper eyelid) • (H01.0) Blepharitis — inflammation of eyelids and eyelashes; characterized by white flaky skin near the eyelashes • (H02.0) Entropion and trichiasis • (H02.1) Ectropion • (H02.2) Lagophthalmos • (H02.3) Blepharochalasis • (H02.4) Ptosis • (H02.6) Xanthelasma of eyelid • (H03.0*) Parasitic infestation of eyelid in diseases classified elsewhere • Dermatitis of eyelid due to Demodex species ( B88.0+ ) • Parasitic infestation of eyelid in: • leishmaniasis ( B55.-+ ) • loiasis ( B74.3+ ) • onchocerciasis ( B73+ ) • phthiriasis ( B85.3+ ) • (H03.1*) Involvement of eyelid in other infectious diseases classified elsewhere • Involvement of eyelid in: • herpesviral (herpes simplex) infection ( B00.5+ ) • leprosy ( A30.-+ ) • molluscum contagiosum ( B08.1+ ) • tuberculosis ( A18.4+ ) • yaws ( A66.-+ ) • zoster ( B02.3+ ) • (H03.8*) Involvement of eyelid in other diseases classified elsewhere • Involvement of eyelid in impetigo
    [Show full text]
  • Local Heat Urticaria
    Volume 23 Number 12 | December 2017 Dermatology Online Journal || Case Presentation DOJ 23 (12): 10 Local heat urticaria Forrest White MD, Gabriela Cobos MD, and Nicholas A Soter MD Affiliations: 1 New York University Langone Health, New York Abstract PHYSICAL EXAMINATION: A brisk, mechanical stroke elicited a linear wheal. Five minutes after exposure We present a 38-year-old woman with local heat to hot water, she developed well-demarcated, urticaria confirmed by heat provocation testing. Heat erythematous blanching wheals that covered the urticaria is a rare form of physical urticaria that is distal forearm and entire hand. triggered by exposure to a heat source, such as hot water or sunlight. Although it is commonly localized Conclusion and immediate, generalized and delayed onset forms Physical or inducible urticarias are a group of exist. Treatment options include antihistamines urticarias that are triggered by various external and heat desensitization. A brisk, mechanical stroke physical stimuli, such as mechanical stimuli, pressure, elicited a linear wheal. Five minutes after exposure cold, light, or temperature change. Urticarias due to hot water, she developed well-demarcated, to temperature change include heat urticaria (HU), erythematous blanching wheals that covered the cholinergic urticaria, and cold urticaria. distal forearm and entire hand. HU is a rare form of chronic inducible urticaria, with Keywords: urticaria, local heat urticaria, physical approximately 60 reported cases [1]. In HU, contact urticaria with a heat source such as hot water, sunlight, hot air, radiant heat, or hot objects results in wheal formation Introduction HISTORY: A 38-year-old woman presented to the Skin and Cancer Unit for the evaluation of recurrent, intensely pruritic eruptions that were precipitated by exposure to heat, which included hot water and sunlight.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Communicable Diseases in Child Care Settings
    MANAGING COMMUNICABLE DISEASES IN CHILD CARE SETTINGS Prepared jointly by: Child Care Licensing Division Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs and Divisions of Communicable Disease & Immunization Michigan Department of Health and Human Services Ways to Keep Children and Adults Healthy It is very common for children and adults to become ill in a child care setting. There are a number of steps child care providers and staff can take to prevent or reduce the incidents of illness among children and adults in the child care setting. You can also refer to the publication Let’s Keep It Healthy – Policies and Procedures for a Safe and Healthy Environment. Hand Washing Hand washing is one of the most effective way to prevent the spread of illness. Hands should be washed frequently including after diapering, toileting, caring for an ill child, and coming into contact with bodily fluids (such as nose wiping), before feeding, eating and handling food, and at any time hands are soiled. Note: The use of disposable gloves during diapering does not eliminate the need for hand washing. The use of gloves is not required during diapering. However, if gloves are used, caregivers must still wash their hands after each diaper change. Instructions for effective hand washing are: 1. Wet hands under warm, running water. 2. Apply liquid soap. Antibacterial soap is not recommended. 3. Vigorously rub hands together for at least 20 seconds to lather all surfaces of the hands. Pay special attention to cleaning under fingernails and thumbs. 4. Thoroughly rinse hands under warm, running water. 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulations for Disease Reporting and Control
    Department of Health Regulations for Disease Reporting and Control Commonwealth of Virginia State Board of Health October 2016 Virginia Department of Health Office of Epidemiology 109 Governor Street P.O. Box 2448 Richmond, VA 23218 Department of Health Department of Health TABLE OF CONTENTS Part I. DEFINITIONS ......................................................................................................................... 1 12 VAC 5-90-10. Definitions ............................................................................................. 1 Part II. GENERAL INFORMATION ............................................................................................... 8 12 VAC 5-90-20. Authority ............................................................................................... 8 12 VAC 5-90-30. Purpose .................................................................................................. 8 12 VAC 5-90-40. Administration ....................................................................................... 8 12 VAC 5-90-70. Powers and Procedures of Chapter Not Exclusive ................................ 9 Part III. REPORTING OF DISEASE ............................................................................................. 10 12 VAC 5-90-80. Reportable Disease List ....................................................................... 10 A. Reportable disease list ......................................................................................... 10 B. Conditions reportable by directors of
    [Show full text]
  • 10 Chronic Urticaria As an Autoimmune Disease
    10 Chronic Urticaria as an Autoimmune Disease Michihiro Hide, Malcolm W. Greaves Introduction Urticaria is conventionally classified as acute, intermittent and chronic (Grea- ves 2000a). Acute urticaria which frequently involves an IgE-mediated im- munological mechanism, is common, its causes often recognised by the patient, and will not be considered further. Intermittent urticaria – frequent bouts of unexplained urticaria at intervals of weeks or months – will be dis- cussed here on the same basis as ‘ordinary’ chronic urticaria. The latter is conventionally defined as the occurrence of daily or almost daily whealing for at least six weeks. The etiology of chronic urticaria is usually obscure. The different clinical varieties of chronic urticaria will be briefly considered here, and attention will be devoted to a newly emerged entity – autoimmune chronic urticaria, since establishing this diagnosis has conceptual, prognostic and the- rapeutic implications. Contact urticaria and angioedema without urticaria will not be dealt with in this account. Classification of Chronic Urticaria The clinical subtypes of chronic urticaria are illustrated in the pie-chart of Fig. 1. The frequency of these subtypes is based upon the authors’ experience at the St John’s Institute of Dermatology in UK. Whilst there may well be mi- nor differences, it is likely that the frequency distribution of these subtypes will be essentially similar in most centres in Europe and North America (Grea- ves 1995, 2000b). However, our experience suggests that the incidence of angioedema, especially that complicated by ordinary chronic urticaria is sub- stantially lower in Japan and south Asian countries (unpublished observation). 310 Michihiro Hide and Malcolm W.
    [Show full text]
  • ICD-10 International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems
    ICD-10 International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision Volume 2 Instruction manual 2010 Edition WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems. - 10th revision, edition 2010. 3 v. Contents: v. 1. Tabular list – v. 2. Instruction manual – v. 3. Alphabetical index. 1.Diseases - classification. 2.Classification. 3.Manuals. I.World Health Organization. II.ICD-10. ISBN 978 92 4 154834 2 (NLM classification: WB 15) © World Health Organization 2011 All rights reserved. Publications of the World Health Organization are available on the WHO web site (www.who.int) or can be purchased from WHO Press, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel.: +41 22 791 3264; fax: +41 22 791 4857; e-mail: [email protected]). Requests for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications – whether for sale or for noncommercial distribution – should be addressed to WHO Press through the WHO web site (http://www.who.int/about/licensing/copyright_form). The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned.
    [Show full text]
  • FAQ REGARDING DISEASE REPORTING in MONTANA | Rev
    Disease Reporting in Montana: Frequently Asked Questions Title 50 Section 1-202 of the Montana Code Annotated (MCA) outlines the general powers and duties of the Montana Department of Public Health & Human Services (DPHHS). The three primary duties that serve as the foundation for disease reporting in Montana state that DPHHS shall: • Study conditions affecting the citizens of the state by making use of birth, death, and sickness records; • Make investigations, disseminate information, and make recommendations for control of diseases and improvement of public health to persons, groups, or the public; and • Adopt and enforce rules regarding the reporting and control of communicable diseases. In order to meet these obligations, DPHHS works closely with local health jurisdictions to collect and analyze disease reports. Although anyone may report a case of communicable disease, such reports are submitted primarily by health care providers and laboratories. The Administrative Rules of Montana (ARM), Title 37, Chapter 114, Communicable Disease Control, outline the rules for communicable disease control, including disease reporting. Communicable disease surveillance is defined as the ongoing collection, analysis, interpretation, and dissemination of disease data. Accurate and timely disease reporting is the foundation of an effective surveillance program, which is key to applying effective public health interventions to mitigate the impact of disease. What diseases are reportable? A list of reportable diseases is maintained in ARM 37.114.203. The list continues to evolve and is consistent with the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE) list of Nationally Notifiable Diseases maintained by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). In addition to the named conditions on the list, any occurrence of a case/cases of communicable disease in the 20th edition of the Control of Communicable Diseases Manual with a frequency in excess of normal expectancy or any unusual incident of unexplained illness or death in a human or animal should be reported.
    [Show full text]
  • Urticaria and Angioedema
    URTICARIA AND ANGIOEDEMA What are the aims of this leaflet? This leaflet has been written to help you understand more about urticaria and angioedema. It tells you what they are, what causes them, what you can do about them, and where you can find out more about them. What is urticaria and angioedema? Urticaria is common, and affects about 20% of people at some point in their lives. It is also known as hives or nettle rash. The short-lived swellings of urticaria are known as weals (see below) and typically any individual spot will clear within 24 hours although the overall rash may last for longer. Angioedema is a form of urticaria in which there is deeper swelling in the skin, and the swelling may take longer than 24 hours to clear. An affected individual may have urticaria alone, angioedema alone, or both together. Both are caused by the release of histamine from cells in the skin called mast cells. When angioedema occurs in association with urticaria, the two conditions can be considered part of the same process. When angioedema occurs on its own, different causes need to be considered. There are different types of urticaria of which the most common form is called ‘ordinary or idiopathic urticaria’. In this type no cause is usually identified and often patients have hives and angioedema occurring together. Ordinary urticaria with or without angioedema is usually divided into ‘acute’ and ‘chronic’ forms. In ‘acute’ urticaria/angioedema, the episode lasts from a few days up to six weeks. Chronic urticaria, by definition, lasts for more than six weeks.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Allergic Diseases (And Differential Diagnoses)
    Chapter 5 5 Allergic Diseases (and Differential Diagnoses) 5.1 Diseases with Possible IgE Involve- tions (combination of type I and type IVb reac- ment (“Immediate-Type Allergies”) tions). Atopic eczema will be discussed in a separate section (see Sect. 5.5.3). There are many allergic diseases manifesting in The maximal manifestation of IgE-mediated different organs and on the basis of different immediate-type allergic reaction is anaphylax- pathomechanisms (see Sect. 1.3). The most is. In the development of clinical symptoms, common allergies develop via IgE antibodies different organs may be involved and symp- and manifest within minutes to hours after al- toms of well-known allergic diseases of skin lergen contact (“immediate-type reactions”). and mucous membranes [also called “shock Not infrequently, there are biphasic (dual) re- fragments” (Karl Hansen)] may occur accord- action patterns when after a strong immediate ing to the severity (see Sect. 5.1.4). reactioninthecourseof6–12harenewedhy- persensitivity reaction (late-phase reaction, LPR) occurs which is triggered by IgE, but am- 5.1.1 Allergic Rhinitis plified by recruitment of additional cells and 5.1.1.1 Introduction mediators.TheseLPRshavetobedistin- guished from classic delayed-type hypersensi- Apart from being an aesthetic organ, the nose tivity (DTH) reactions (type IV reactions) (see has several very interesting functions (Ta- Sect. 5.5). ble 5.1). It is true that people can live without What may be confusing for the inexperi- breathing through the nose, but disturbance of enced physician is familiar to the allergist: The this function can lead to disease. Here we are same symptoms of immediate-type reactions interested mostly in defense functions against are observed without immune phenomena particles and irritants (physical or chemical) (skin tests or IgE antibodies) being detectable.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Community Based Curriculum on Ophthalmology for Under Graduate Medical Course in Bangladesh
    Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull 2012; 38: 51-58 Development of community based curriculum on ophthalmology for under graduate medical course in Bangladesh Khan AK1, Hussain AZMI2 1Depertment of Ophthalmology, Gonosayastha Somaj Vittik Medical College, Savar & Dhanmondi, Dhaka. 2UniSA School of Public Health and Life Sciences, University of South Asia, Banani, Dhaka. Email: [email protected] Abstract The curriculum represents the expression of educational ideas in practice. Ophthalmic education is the corner stone to improve eye care globally. Curriculum needs continuous modification varying in different geographic locations. Though 90% of common conditions are either preventable or curable but emphasis on the common conditions is inadequate. This is a stepwise descriptive study aiming to develop a community based ophthalmology curriculum for undergraduate medical course in Bangladesh conducted during March 2007 to February 2008 at UniSA School of Public Health and Life Sciences, University of South Asia, Banani, Dhaka. Delphi technique, a modified qualitative method was used to accumulate data and reaching a consensus opinion for developing the curriculum. Study approach includes two iterative rounds and finally a workshop. Iteration of round-I was "What are the eye diseases with overall knowledge of their management one MBBS physician should acquire"; followed by a list of eye diseases and topics for expert opinion. The response was collated. Iteration round-II was "How much a MBBS student should have percentage of knowledge, attitude and skills on each topic while being taught". The response was collated and presented to panel of expert ophthalmologists for discussion and validation. In the round-I Delphi, 400 (62%) out to total 641 ophthalmologist were randomly selected dividing in categories (62% in each) of Professor-22, Associate Professor-12, Assistant Professor-26, Consultant-27, ophthalmologists working in NGO-56 and ophthalmologists in private sector-257.
    [Show full text]