arXiv:1710.09096v2 [math.CO] 15 Apr 2018 ht ne oecniin,sm fteuin ftegah nth in graphs the Keywords: of unions transfer. the state of perfect transfers. some state admit scheme perfect conditions, admits some which under scheme the that, in class only the emyjs a hr sPT“between” PST is there say just may we H τ otnostm unu aka time at walk quantum continuous-time e u eidci hr sapstv time positive a is there if periodic at rps nti ae ecaatrz l h rpsi h Johnso graph the Kneser in the graphs that show the we all g Indeed, characterize a property. we on this paper happen have can this which transfers In state perfect graphs. whether determine to is u suiay ems have must we unitary, is ayeapew a hwta S cusbtentevrie of vertices the between occurs PST that show can we example easy H oeta fteei S from PST is there if that Note unu aka time at walk quantum Introduction 1. graph any For Abstract emydo h subscript the drop may we rpitsbitdt Elsevier to submitted Preprint Mokhtar) [email protected] efc unu tt rnfro h ono scheme Johnson the on transfer state quantum Perfect u X X if efc tt transfer state perfect fteei oiietime positive a is there if otevertex the to ∗ u stecaatrsi etro h vertex the of vector characteristic the is ti nipratqeto oako hc rpsPTcnhpe.A happen. can PST graphs which on ask to question important an is It Let mi addresses: Email author Corresponding ( ( |H t t n at and e = ) e = ) X amnAhmadi Bahman X ( τ itA itA ) easml rp.Tetasto arxo h continuous-time the of matrix transition The graph. simple a be u,v v efc tt rnfr soito cee ono scheme Johnson scheme, association transfer, state perfect where , esyta hr spretsaetase in transfer state perfect is there that say We . eateto ahmtc,Sia nvriy hrz Ira Shiraz, University, Shiraz Mathematics, of Department se[6]). (see | X r qiaety if equivalently, or, 1 = v ihteajcnymatrix adjacency the with [email protected] ttime at A t M .SidrhHaghighi), Shirdareh H. (M. = o S)in PST) (or ntegraph the on ∗ .H hrae ahgi ha Mokhtar Ahmad Haghighi, Shirdareh H. M. , A | λ ( τ X | X τ . ftegraph the If 1.) = e ute,sythat say further, We, . if steajcnymti of matrix adjacency the is ) uhthat such u |H to X τ X ( v uhthat such τ X hnteei loPTfrom PST also is there then , rmtevertex the from ) H t u,v sgvnb h arxvle function matrix-valued the by given is sgvnb h arxvle function matrix-valued the by given is X u |H | ( u and τ ( .I sa motn problem important an is It 1. = τ ) in Bha Ahmadi), (Bahman e ) u A u,u |H v [email protected] V h rniinmti fthe of matrix transition the , = ,adthat and ), | ( X ( X τ ,adw say we and 1, = λe ) .(oeta since that (Note ). scerfo h context, the from clear is u,u v X u o some for , | otevertex the to is o l vertices all for 1 = X periodic esyta there that say We . X X etme 4 2018 14, September rmtevertex the from ilb periodic be will n vnfml of family iven eas show also We λ h h path the the ∈ tavertex a at K X Johnson e v scheme n v C (2 to where , tefis itself ttime at (Ahmad ,k k, H u X an s is ) ( (so τ u ) . P2 (see Corollary 2.5). We can, also, show directly (see [7]) that PST happens between the end-points of the path P3, as well; but this is not the case for any other path. In other words, it has been shown in [2] that if n> 3, then there is no PST on the path Pn. On the other hand, in the works such as [1, 2, 6, 9], the existence of PST in different graphs has been shown. See [7] for a survey on the subject. In [3] necessary and sufficient conditions have been proposed for graphs in association schemes to have PST and using this result the authors have examined some of the graphs in some association schemes. Since one of the most important association schemes is the Johnson scheme J(n, k), it is quite natural to ask whether any of the classes of this scheme admits PST. In this paper, we prove that except for the Kneser graph K(2k, k), which is one of the classes of the Johnson scheme for the case n = 2k, no other class has the capability to have PST. We, further, deduce that the union of all the graphs in the scheme J(2k, k), except the Kneser graph K(2k, k), admits PST as long as the number of vertices of the scheme is divisible by 4. In the next section, we will provide some brief background on the topic. Then we will prove the main result in Section 3. In Section 4 we will study the case of sums of the classes of the scheme J(2k, k) and, finally, conclude the paper with some further discussions in Section 5.
2. Background In this section, we provide the reader with some necessary tools and facts on the topic, which will be used in Section 3. For the notation and basic facts of algebraic graph theory and association schemes the reader may refer to [8] and [4]. All the association schemes are assumed to be symmetric. Let A = {I = A0, A1,...,Ad} (where Ai are v×v matrices) be an association scheme with d classes whose minimal idempotents (i.e. projections to the eigenspaces) are E = {E0, E1,...,Ed}. Since E is a basis for the Bose-Mesner algebra of A, there are coefficients pi(j) such that
d Ai = pi(j)Ej , for i =0, . . . , d. j=0 X For any i =0,...,d, the (real) numbers pi(j), j =0,...,d, are the eigenvalues of Ai and the columns of Ej are eigenvectors of Ai. We can think of Ai as the adjacency matrix of a regular graph Xi on v vertices of valency pi(0). We will denote the valency of Xi by vi. On the other hand, the idempotents Ei can also be written as a linear combination of the Aj ’s; that is, there are coefficients qi(j) such that d 1 E = q (j)A , for i =0, . . . , d. (1) i v i j j=0 X The numbers qi(j) are called the dual eigenvalues of the scheme. We note that qj (0) = tr(Ej ) which is equal to the dimension of the j-th eigenspace of the
2 matrices of the scheme which will be denoted by mj . The following fundamental result will be used in Section 3 (see [4]). Proposition 2.1. Using the notation above, for any i, j = 0,...,d, we have qj (i)/mj = pi(j)/vi. Given an association scheme, the following result gives necessary conditions for a graph belonging to the scheme to have PST [3]. Theorem 2.2. Let X be a graph that belongs to an association scheme with d classes and with adjacency matrix A = A(X). If X admits perfect state transfer at time τ, then there is a permutation matrix T with no fixed points and of order two such that H(τ) = λT for some λ ∈ C. Moreover, T is a class of the scheme. The following result from [7], as well, provides a necessary condition for the existence of PST on a vertex-transitive graph. Theorem 2.3. Let X be a connected vertex-transitive graph. If X admits per- fect state transfer at time τ, then there is a permutation matrix T with no fixed points and of order two such that H(τ)= λT for some λ ∈ C.
Suppose in a class of an association scheme PST occurs and that E0,...,Ed are the idempotents of the scheme. By Theorem 2.2, T must be one of the classes of the scheme and since the eigenvalues of T are {−1, +1}, for any j =0,...,d, + − we have T Ej = ±Ej . As in [3], we define a partition (IT , IT ) of {0,...,d} + − as j ∈ IT if T Ej = Ej and j ∈ IT otherwise. We might drop the subscript T if T is clear from the context. Furthermore, for any x ∈ Z we denote by ord2(x) the exponent of 2 in the factorization of x and by convention we define ord2(0) = +∞. The following theorem, which is a part of [3, Theorem 4.3], provides other necessary conditions for the existence of PST on a graph belonging to an as- sociation scheme. According to [3, Lemma 4.2], if PST happens in a graph belonging to an association scheme, then all the eigenvalues of the graph are integers. Let X be a graph in an association scheme on which PST occurs and let λ0 > ··· > λd be the distinct integer eigenvalues of X. Define
αX = gcd({λ0 − λj | j ∈{0,...,d}}). (2)
We will drop the subscript X, if the graph X is clear from the context. Theorem 2.4. With the notation above, if PST occurs on X, then we have + − ord2(λ0 −λj ) > ord2(α) for j ∈ I and ord2(λ0 −λℓ) = ord2(α) for ℓ ∈ I . + It is clear that for any such T , 0 ∈ IT , but identifying the whole partition (I+, I−) is not easy in general. We next point out the following observation which follows easily from the definition (see [7]).
Corollary 2.5. There is PST between the vertices of the graph K2 at time τ = π/2.
3 From [7] we also recall the following result which provides a sufficient con- dition for a graph to be periodic. Theorem 2.6. If all eigenvalues of a graph X are integers, then X is periodic.
We conclude this section with a brief introduction to the Johnson scheme. Throughout the paper we will assume that n ≥ 2k. For any i = 0, 1,...,k, we define the graph J(n,k,i) to be the graph whose vertex set is the set of all k-subsets of {1,...,n} and in which two vertices A and B are adjacent if |A ∩ B| = i (in some texts the adjacency in J(n,k,i) is defined as when |A ∩ B| = k − i, but this makes no difference in our discussion). It can be shown that the set A = {A0, A1,...,Ak}, where Ai is A(J(n,k,k − i)), the adjacency matrix of the graph J(n,k,k − i), is an association scheme (see for example [4]). This scheme is called the Johnson scheme, denoted by J(n, k), and the classes J(n,k,i) are called the generalized Johnson graphs. The special cases of J(n, k, 0) and J(n,k,k − 1) are called the Kneser graph (often denoted by K(n, k)), and the Johnson graph, respectively. Note that the adjacency matrix of J(n,k,k) is the identity matrix; that is A0 = I. In the following lemma, we observe that most of the generalized Johnson graphs are connected. Lemma 2.7. The graph J(n,k,i) is connected if the non-negative integer i satisfies 2k − n
Proof. Consider a vertex A = {a1,...,ak} from the graph X = J(n,k,i). For any vertex B = {b,a2,...,ak} which is obtained by changing one of the elements of A, we claim that there is a path from A to B. According to the conditions on n, k and i, the set {1,...,n}\{a1,...,ak,b} contains at least k − i elements such as c1,...,ck−i; so we have the following path in X:
A ∼{c1,...,ck−i,ak−i+1,...,ak}∼{b,a2,...,ak−i,ak−i+1,...,ak} = B, and the claim follows. If there is a path between two vertices V and W , we will write V ←→ W . Now we show that, for each vertex C = {b1,...,bk}, A ←→ C. Indeed, if A ∩ C = ∅ the following path is in X:
A ←→ {b1,a2,...,ak} ←→{b1,b2,a3,...,ak} ←→··· ←→{b1,b2,...,bk} = C.
On the other hand, if |A ∩ C| = m> 0, then without loss of generality we may assume that A ∩ C = {b1,...,bm} = {a1,...,am}. Then, since
{a1,...,am,bm+1,am+2,...,ak} = {b1,...,bm,bm+1,am+2,...,ak}, the following path exists:
A ←→ {b1,...,bm,bm+1,am+2,...,ak}
←→ {b1,...,bm,bm+1,bm+2,am+3,...,ak} ←→··· ←→{b1,...,bk} = C.
Therefore the result follows.
4 In particular, if k ≥ 2 and0