The International Socialist League and Revolutionary Syndicalism in South Africa, 1915-19201
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
“The Industrial Union is the Embryo of the Socialist Commonwealth”: The International Socialist League and Revolutionary Syndicalism in South Africa, 1915-19201 Lucien van der Walt The focus of this paper is the International Socialist Industrial Workers of Africa was the first trade union for League, the main revolutionary socialist organization active African workers in South African history. Although the in South Africa in the latter half of the 1910s. The Interna- question of the International Socialist League’s analysis of tional Socialist League was founded in September 1915 and racial oppression in South Africa does not form a central absorbed into the Communist Party of South Africa in July focus of this paper, it will also be suggested that the organi- 1921, having played a central part in the processes that led zation developed a coherent analysis of racial oppression in to the founding of that Party over the previous year. South Africa, and advocated the removal of racially oppres- 2 This paper provides a re-examination of this important sive laws through industrial action. organization, disputing the views dominant in the literature. The first part of this paper situates the International So- The conventional view in the literature is that the Interna- cialist League within the context of the historical literature tional Socialist League was always a radical Marxist party, and within the context of the international socialist move- and that its role in founding the Communist Party was sim- ment of the early 20th century. The second part of this pa- ply the product of this basic political commitment. It is also per will look at the history and political theory of the Inter- asserted in much of the literature that the International So- national Socialist League and at the attempts at industrial cialist League ignored (at best) the question of racial op- organization with which the organization was associated. pression in South Africa. Although both the International Socialist League and the This paper will challenge both of these claims, drawing Industrial Workers of Africa were very small organizations, extensively on primary sources. It will be demonstrated, it is when we understand them within their international firstly, that the International Socialist League was a revolu- context — as part of a far larger revolutionary socialist cur- tionary syndicalist organization, and not a Marxist group. rent — that we best grasp their full significance. Interna- As such, the International Socialist League held that ra- tionally, the organization to which the International Social- cially integrated revolutionary industrial unions should ist League exhibits the greatest political affinity was not the overthrow capitalism and the State, replacing both with “Marxist left wing of the Eu ropean socialist movement,”3 workers’ self-management of the economy . Hence, the or- but the revolutionary syndicalist I.W.W. The significance of ganization must be situated within the context of the inter- this reassessment of the International Socialist League is national revolutionary syndicalist movement of the early threefold. Firstly, it is a contribution to our understanding 20th century, a movement exemplified by the Industrial of the nature of the early socialist movement in South Af- Workers of the World ( or I.W.W.) in the United States of rica, and, simultaneously, a critique of the conventional America. It is for this reason that the International Socialist historiography. Secondly, it is a contribution to the recovery League sought to organize revolutionary industrial unions of the history of revolutionary syndicalism more generally. in South Africa, the most notable of which was the Indus- This field of research is relatively undeveloped, especially trial Workers of Africa. Founded in September 1917, the with regard to revolutionary syndicalist groups in areas © 1999: Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East, Vol. XIX No. 1 6 Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East, Vol. XIX No. 1 (1999) such as Africa. Thirdly, the reassessment provides a partial The argument that the International Socialist League examination of the approach adopted by revolutionary syn- was a radical Marxist group and a forerunner of the Com- dicalists in South Africa vis -a-vis racial oppression, and munist Party — that is, the notion of political and organiza- hence, is a contribution to our understanding of revolution- tional continuity between the two organizations — may be ary syndicalist analyses of racism more generally. traced back to the interpretation of the history of the early Histories of Socialism: A Critical Look at the South Af- socialist movement in South Africa developed by writers rican Historiography associated with the Communist Party. This body of work was developed from the 1940s onwards, as a number of Despite the small size of the International Socialist writers — Brian Bunting, R. K. Cope, Lionel Forman, League — the organization probably never had more than a few hundred members4 — the organization has loomed “Lerumo” (Michael Harmel), Eddie Roux, Jack and Ray Simons19 and, more recently, Jeremy Cronin — began to large in most discussions of the early socialist movement in produce published histories of socialism in South Africa. South Africa. The International Socialist League appears in works ranging from academic studies, to conservative anti- These works — which I will refer to collectively as the Communist polemics,5 Pan-Africanist accounts,6 contemp o- “Communist school” of South African socialist history — rary socialist newspapers,7 and the histories written by ac- were strongly influenced by the Communist Party’s own tivists in the Communist Party of South Africa, and its suc- views of its history and of what constituted correct socialist cessor, the South African Communist Party. Despite their policies. Cope, for example, was a sympathizer of the Party varying perspectives, however, these accounts generally and was commissioned to write a work celebrating the life share the view that the International Socialist League was a of W. H. (“Bill”) Andrews, a long-time Party leader (and radical Marxist organization similar to Lenin’s Bolshevik founding me mber of the International Socialist League), in Party in Russia and that the International Socialist League’s the 1940s. Forman was a key intellectual in the Party in the role in founding the Communist Party of South Africa was 1940s and 1950s. The Simonses involvement in the Party a natural and obvious outcome of this affinity. Thus, we spanned many decades. Forman and the Simonses produced read in various accounts that the International Socialist detailed histories of the resistance movement in South Af- League was launched and led by “revolutionary Marxists,”8 rica. Brian Bunting and “Lerumo” were active in the Party occupied itself with “following the teachings of Karl from the 1940s onwards, and Cronin, from the 1970s. Marx” 9 and with “applying Marxism to South Africa,”10 Roux’s case differs slightly, in that he had left the Commu- and acted as “tireless propagandists” for Marxist ideology.11 nist Party at the time he published his accounts. A founder Already built on firm Marxist foundations, the “entire out- member of the Young Communist League, and one-time look” of the International Socialist League is described as editor of the Communist Party’s newspaper Umsebenzi “ever more deeply colored by…the teachings of Lenin,”12 (Worker) and member of the Communist Party’s political and consequently, the organization played a central role in bureau, Roux withdrew from the organization in the late founding the Communist Party. Thus, the International So- 1930s, deeply disillusioned by years of infighting and cialist League is described as the “Communist nucleus” of purges. Yet, whilst Roux wrote his works after his break “true socialists”13 in Communist Party publications. with the Party, he still shared many assumptions about the There is a strong tendency in the literature to present the early history of socialism in South Africa with his peers who remained party loyalists. International Socialist League as simply a chapter in the history of the Communist Party, a sort of Communist Party It is in the work of the Communist school that the habit- in embryo, the first six years of South African communism. ual presentation of the International Socialist League as a Take, for example, the March 1944 issue of the Party Or- radical Marxist organization seems to have been first devel- ganizer, an organ of the Cape Communist Party of South oped in a systematic form. In the historiography associated Africa: “The Communist Party of South Africa was really with Communist Party of South Africa and South African founded in 1915 under the name of ‘The International So- Communist Party leaders and intellectuals (Bunting, Cope, cialist League’ as a result of a split in the Labour Party on Cronin, Forman, Lerumo, and the Simonses), the Interna- the question of the War.”14 Less ambitiously, perhaps, other tional Socialist League is typically characterized as part of Communist Party accounts refer to the International Social- the anti-war Marxist minorities movement: thus, the Inter- ist League as the “direct forerunner”15 or the “main founda- national Socialist League is typically praised for developing tion” and direct predecessor16 of the Communist Party of an anti-war analysis “closely approaching the stand of South Africa. Similarly, the autobiography