Voter Registration, Please Call Your County Recorder’S Office
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
United States District Court for the District of Arizona
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) THE ARIZONA LIBERTARIAN ) PARTY AND MICHAEL KIELSKY, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) COMPLAINT ) MICHELE REAGAN, ) Civil Action No. ___________ ) Defendant. ) ) INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Arizona Libertarian Party (“AZLP”) and its Chairman Michael Kielsky (together, “the Libertarians”) bring this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, to vindicate rights guaranteed to them by the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. The Libertarians specifically challenge the constitutionality of two provisions of Arizona law, A.R.S. §§ 16-321 and 16-322, which establish the requirements that political parties must meet to place their candidates on Arizona’s primary election ballot. These provisions formerly enabled candidates to appear on the primary ballot by submitting nomination petitions with a number of signatures defined as a percentage of their party’s qualified registered voters in the relevant jurisdiction. In 2015, however, the provisions were amended, such that they now define the signature requirements as a percentage of all “qualified signers” in the relevant jurisdiction – a pool defined to include independent and unaffiliated voters. As applied to the Libertarians – though not to the major parties – this drastically increased the number of signatures required. In general, the new requirements for the Libertarians are at least 20 times greater than the old ones, depending on the office, and in many cases much greater. Sections 16-321 and 16-322, as amended, violate the Libertarians’ First Amendment rights on several grounds. First, they impose unconstitutionally severe signature requirements under the settled precedent of the Supreme Court of the United States. Second, they violate the Libertarians’ freedom of association, because they compel AZLP, as a practical matter, to rely on non-members for purposes of nominating its own partisan candidates. -
Insider's Guidetoazpolitics
olitics e to AZ P Insider’s Guid Political lists ARIZONA NEWS SERVICE ARIZONA CAPITOL TIMES • Arizona Capitol Reports FEATURING PROFILES of Arizona’s legislative & congressional districts, consultants & public policy advocates Statistical Trends The chicken Or the egg? WE’RE EXPERTS AT GETTING POLICY MAKERS TO SEE YOUR SIDE OF THE ISSUE. R&R Partners has a proven track record of using the combined power of lobbying, public relations and advertising experience to change both minds and policy. The political environment is dynamic and it takes a comprehensive approach to reach the right audience at the right time. With more than 50 years of combined experience, we’ve been helping our clients win, regardless of the political landscape. Find out what we can do for you. Call Jim Norton at 602-263-0086 or visit us at www.rrpartners.com. JIM NORTON JEFF GRAY KELSEY LUNDY STUART LUTHER 101 N. FIRST AVE., STE. 2900 Government & Deputy Director Deputy Director Government & Phoenix, AZ 85003 Public Affairs of Client Services of Client Public Affairs Director Development Associate CONTENTS Politics e to AZ ARIZONA NEWS SERVICE Insider’s Guid Political lists STAFF CONTACTS 04 ARIZONA NEWS SERVICE BEATING THE POLITICAL LEGISLATIVE Administration ODDS CONSULTANTS, DISTRICT Vice President & Publisher: ARIZONA CAPITOL TIMES • Arizona Capitol Reports Ginger L. Lamb Arizonans show PUBLIC POLICY PROFILES Business Manager: FEATURING PROFILES of Arizona’s legislative & congressional districts, consultants & public policy advocates they have ‘the juice’ ADVOCATES, -
2011 Legislative Summary
th 50 Legislature, First Regular Session Arizona Department of Transportation Legislative Summaries 2011 Contents Members of the 50th Legislature……………………………………………….3 SORTED BY Bill Number Transportation-Related Legislative Summaries - Passed…..…………….……….7 Transportation-Related Legislation - Vetoed………………………………………. 21 *Information for Legislative Summaries was gathered from Legislation On Line Arizona (LOLA), Legislative Research Staff Bill Summaries, and bill language. **Official copies of all 2011 Chapter Laws and complete files of action for public review (for both the Regular and Special Sessions) are available on-line at www.azleg.gov - 1 - Government Relations 206 South Seventeenth Avenue Phoenix, Arizona 85007-3213 Janice K. Brewer Kevin Biesty Governor Government June 7, 2011 Relations Director John S. Halikowski Director John Halikowski, Director Arizona Department of Transportation 206 South 17th Avenue, MD 100A Phoenix, AZ 85007 Dear Director Halikowski: Attached is the final summary of transportation-related legislation considered during the First Regular Session of the 50th Legislature. The First Regular Legislative Session ended on April 20, 2011 lasting 100 days. During the session, 1,496 bills, resolutions, and memorials were introduced, of which 393 were enacted and 29 were vetoed. This document and Final Summaries from previous years can be found online at http://www.azdot.gov/CCPartnerships/Government_Relations/reports.asp. Full legislative chapter text, fact sheets and other legislative information and links can be -
A Conversation with Sr. Elizabeth Carey
September 2019 A Conversation with Sr. Elizabeth Carey You’ve heard of the FIVE brave nuns who came from Ireland to begin our school in 1954, but who was the SIXTH? by Debra LaPlante & Mary Jo Wahlers The following is our conversation with Sr. Elizabeth, the 6th nun to arrive, about her memories of the beginning years at SS. Simon & Jude School. How did it come about that you would be sent to Arizona? I had already made my final profession and knew the other Loreto Sisters who were here in Arizona as they were from County Westmeath, so I was sent to replace Sr. Carmel in 1955. (Sr. Maria Sheerin who is also currently living at the convent was also sent with Sr. Elizabeth to Arizona at that time, but she only stayed one year as she was called to do further studies.) Did you have any reservations about coming to Arizona? Like the original five, I thought I may not return to Ireland again, but five years later, I was lucky enough to be able to travel to see my family! As the Loreto Sisters grew in numbers throughout the United States, we often traveled to attend meetings in other cities in the U.S, or other countries, and were given the opportunity to visit our families in Ireland. Did you live in the convent here on campus? No, the convent wasn’t built yet, so we lived in a house on 27th Drive in the beginning years. We burned our garbage right at the house in those days, and never crossed the irrigation ditch. -
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ARIZONA LIBERTARIAN PARTY; No. 13-16254 ARIZONA GREEN PARTY; JAMES MARCH; KENT SOLBERG; STEVE DC No. LACKEY, 4:11 cv-0856 Plaintiffs-Appellants, CKJ v. ORDER AND MICHELE REAGAN, Secretary of AMENDED State, OPINION Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Cindy K. Jorgenson, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted January 29, 2015—University of Arizona, James E. Rogers College of Law, Tucson, Arizona Filed April 24, 2015 Amended August 7, 2015 Before: A. Wallace Tashima, M. Margaret McKeown, and Marsha S. Berzon, Circuit Judges. Order; Opinion by Judge Tashima; Concurrence by Judge McKeown 2 ARIZONA LIBERTARIAN PARTY V. REAGAN SUMMARY* Civil Rights The panel affirmed the district court’s summary judgment in an action brought by the Arizona Green Party, the Arizona Libertarian Party, and three of their members alleging that Arizona’s voter registration form violates their First and Fourteenth Amendment rights. In 2011, the Arizona Legislature enacted a law requiring the voter registration form distributed by the Arizona Secretary of State to list the two largest parties (as measured by number of registered voters) on the form, as well as provide a blank line for “other party preferences.” See Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 16-152(A)(5). Prior to the 2011 amendment, Arizona law required only that voter registration forms include a blank space for the registrant’s party preference. The panel first determined that plaintiffs failed to adduce evidence that the revised registration form actually discourages or prevents voters from registering with minor parties. -
Fall 2017 Commencement Program
TE TA UN S E ST TH AT I F E V A O O E L F A DITAT DEUS N A E R R S I O Z T S O A N Z E I A R I T G R Y A 1912 1885 ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY COMMENCEMENT AND CONVOCATION PROGRAM Fall 2017 December 11-13, 2017 THE NATIONAL ANTHEM THE STAR-SPANGLED BANNER O say can you see, by the dawn’s early light, What so proudly we hailed at the twilight’s last gleaming? Whose broad stripes and bright stars through the perilous fight O’er the ramparts we watched, were so gallantly streaming? And the rockets’ red glare, the bombs bursting in air Gave proof through the night that our flag was still there. O say does that Star-Spangled Banner yet wave O’er the land of the free and the home of the brave? ALMA MATER ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY Where the bold saguaros Raise their arms on high, Praying strength for brave tomorrows From the western sky; Where eternal mountains Kneel at sunset’s gate, Here we hail thee, Alma Mater, Arizona State. —Hopkins-Dresskell MAROON AND GOLD Fight, Devils down the field Fight with your might and don’t ever yield Long may our colors outshine all others Echo from the buttes, Give em’ hell Devils! Cheer, cheer for A-S-U! Fight for the old Maroon For it’s Hail! Hail! The gang’s all here And it’s onward to victory! Students whose names appear in this program have completed degree requirements. -
IN the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the DISTRICT of ALASKA JED WHITTAKER, Plaintiff, V. BYRON MALLOTT, in His Official Capac
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA JED WHITTAKER, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:16-cv-00220-SLG BYRON MALLOTT, in his official capacity as Lieutenant Governor of the State of Alaska, Defendant. ORDER RE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Before the Court at Docket 8 is Plaintiff Jed Whittaker’s Motion for Summary Judgment and at Docket 15 is Defendant Byron Mallott’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant did not respond to Plaintiff’s motion, which was filed before Defendant was served with the Complaint. Plaintiff opposed Defendant’s motion at Docket 19. No reply was filed.1 Also before the Court, at Docket 17, is Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant opposed this motion to strike at Docket 19. Oral argument was not requested and was not necessary to the Court’s decision. BACKGROUND This case concerns the constitutionality of Alaska’s ballot access requirements as codified at Alaska Statute (AS) 15.25.160. Plaintiff Jed Whittaker was a candidate for United States Senator for Alaska in 2016; he was not affiliated with a “political party” as that term is defined by Alaska law.2 To have his name printed on the official ballot, Mr. 1 Plaintiff filed a notice of supplemental authority at Docket 25 and Docket 26. 2 See AS 15.80.010(27) (defining a “political party” as one whose candidate obtained three percent of the vote in the immediately preceding general election for governor, U.S. Senator, or Case 3:16-cv-00220-SLG Document 27 Filed 04/27/17 Page 1 of 23 Whittaker was required to submit a petition “signed by qualified voters of the state equal in number to at least one percent of the number of voters who cast ballots in the preceding general election.”3 For the 2016 election, a petition was valid if it contained at least 2,854 signatures.4 Mr. -
2011 Arizona Legislative Scorecard -- (27Th
2011 Arizona Legislative Scorecard -- (27th annual scorecard from AFP/AFT) Americans for Prosperity 2011 Arizona Legislative Scorecard www.aztaxpayers.org 2011 05-11 Cumulative Chamber Legislator--2011 Score 2011 Designation 10 09 08 07 06 05 Avg. Designation Party LD Senate Andy Biggs 99 Hero of the Taxpayer 82 61 96 94 72 84 84 Champion of the Taxpayer R 22 Senate Ron Gould 99 Hero of the Taxpayer 84 70 96 97 90 89 89 Champion of the Taxpayer R 3 Senate Russell K. Pearce 95 Hero of the Taxpayer 84 90 89 91 71 84 86 Champion of the Taxpayer R 18 Senate Scott Bundgaard 95 Hero of the Taxpayer 95 Hero of the Taxpayer R 4 Senate Gail Griffin 95 Hero of the Taxpayer 95 Hero of the Taxpayer R 25 Senate Steve Smith 95 Hero of the Taxpayer 95 Hero of the Taxpayer R 23 Senate Lori Klein 95 Hero of the Taxpayer 95 Hero of the Taxpayer R 6 Senate Sylvia Allen 94 Hero of the Taxpayer 48 90 98 83 Champion of the Taxpayer R 5 Senate Steve Pierce 94 Hero of the Taxpayer 44 88 76 Friend of the Taxpayer R 1 Senate Rick Murphy 94 Hero of the Taxpayer 49 74 82 82 67 84 76 Friend of the Taxpayer R 9 Senate Adam Driggs 94 Hero of the Taxpayer 79 73 79 70 79 Friend of the Taxpayer R 11 Senate Steven Yarbrough 93 Hero of the Taxpayer 42 72 84 75 63 69 71 Friend of the Taxpayer R 21 Senate Nancy K. -
Full Page Photo
2010 Candidate Statement Pamphlet General Election Table of Contents Letter from the Commission 2 General Election Date 3 Disclaimer 3 Why is the Pamphlet Printed in Spanish? 3 Voting Information/ Secretary of State’s Office 4 Help America Vote Act of 2002 4 Alternative Formats 4 Candidate Debate Information 4 What is my Legislative District? 5 How do I Receive an Early Ballot or Sample Ballot? 5 Citizens Clean Elections Act 6 Citizens Clean Elections Commission 7 Citizens Clean Elections Fund 7 Tax Credits 8 Contact the Commission 8 Citizens Clean Elections Commissioners 8 Citizens Clean Elections Staff 9 Candidate Statements 10 Sun Sounds of Arizona 98 Become a Poll Worker 99 Voter Identification Requirements 100 1 2010 Candidate Statement Pamphlet General Election Letter from the Commission Dear Arizona Voters: Thank you for becoming involved in the political process in Arizona. By voting in the upcoming General Election, you will be electing candidates for all of the statewide offices as well as 90 legislative seats consisting of 30 Senators and 60 Representatives. The Candidate Statements Pamphlet is a nonpartisan, plain-language handbook published by the Citizens Clean Elections Commission, an independent state agency, to give you information about state elections. The Commission’s mission is to fairly, faithfully and fully implement and administer Arizona’s Citizens Clean Elections Act, which is a campaign finance reform measure initiated by Arizona citizens and passed by voters in 1998. The Act creates a campaign financing system that provides full public funding to qualified state and legislative office candidates who agree to abide by the Citizens Clean Elections Act and Commission regulations. -
N:\Civil Rights\Equal Protection
Case 4:11-cv-00856-CKJ Document 25 Filed 03/19/13 Page 1 of 15 1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 10 11 ARIZONA LIBERTARIAN PARTY, et) al., ) 12 ) Plaintiffs, ) No. CIV 11-856-TUC-CKJ 13 ) vs. ) ORDER 14 ) KEN BENNETT, Secretary of State, ) 15 ) Defendant. ) 16 ) 17 Pending before the Court are the Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 15) by 18 Secretary of State Ken Bennet (“the Secretary” or “Defendant”) and the Motion for Summary 19 Judgment (Doc. 17) filed by Plaintiffs Arizona Libertarian Party Incorporated, Arizona Green 20 Party, James March, Kent Solbert, Steve Lackey (“Plaintiffs”). Responses and replies have 21 been filed. The parties presented oral argument to the Court on December 3, 2012. 22 23 Factual Background 24 In 2011, the Arizona Legislature amended the statute regarding the form used for the 25 registration of electors. At the time of the amendment, the statute stated the form “shall 26 contain . [t]he registrant’s party preference.” A.R.S. § 16-152(A)(5) (2004). The amended 27 statute now provides that the form shall contain: 28 Case 4:11-cv-00856-CKJ Document 25 Filed 03/19/13 Page 2 of 15 1 5. The registrant's party preference. The two largest political parties that are entitled to continued representation on the ballot shall be listed on the form in the order 2 determined by calculating which party has the highest number of registered voters at the close of registration for the most recent general election for governor, then the 3 second highest. -
Municipal 2012
2012 Municipal policy Statement Core Principles • PROTECTION OF SHARED REVENUES. Arizona’s municipalities rely on the existing state-collected shared revenue system to provide quality services to their residents. The League will resist any attacks on this critical source of funding for localities, which are responsibly managing lean budgets during difficult economic times. The League opposes unfunded legislative mandates, as well as the imposition of fees and assessments on municipalities as a means of shifting the costs of State operations onto cities and towns. In particular, the League opposes any further diversions of Highway User Revenue Fund (HURF) monies away from municipalities and calls upon the Legislature to restore diverted HURF funding to critical road and street projects. • PRESERVATION OF LOCAL CONTROL. The League calls upon the Arizona Legislature to respect the authority of cities and towns to govern their communities free from legislative interference and the imposi- tion of regulatory burdens. The League shares the sentiments of Governor Brewer, who, in vetoing anti-city legislation last session, wrote: “I am becoming increasingly concerned that many bills introduced this session micromanage decisions best made at the local level. What happened to the conservative belief that the most effective, responsible and responsive government is government closest to the people?” Fiscal Stewardship The League is prepared to support reasonable reforms to the state revenue system that adhere to the principles of simplicity, fairness and balance and that do not infringe upon the ability of cities and towns to implement tax systems that reflect local priorities and economies. • The League proposes to work with the Legislature to ensure that both the State and municipalities are equipped with the economic development tools they need to help them remain competitive nationally and internationally. -
Credit Unions Get out the Vote (Cu Gotv) Candidate Info
CREDIT UNIONS GET OUT THE VOTE (CU GOTV) CANDIDATE INFO Redistricting Notice: Listed below are candidates in districts throughout the entire state. Due to redistricting, you may be voting for candidates in districts which are new to you. For additional information please visit Find my district US Senate Richard Carmona (Democrat) PO Box 12399 Tucson, AZ 85732 www.carmonaforarizona.com YouTube Twitter Facebook Jeff Flake (Republican) PO Box 12512 Tempe, AZ 85284 www.jeffflake.com/ YouTube Twitter Facebook Wil Cardon (Republican) 4040 East McClellan Road House 8 Mesa, AZ 85205 http://wilcardon.com/ YouTube Twitter Facebook Bryan Hackbarth (Republican) PO Box 2149 Peoria, AZ 85380 http://www.bryan4senate.com/ Clair Van Steenwyk (Republican) 26682 W. Burnett Rd. Buckeye, AZ 85396 http://www.crossroadswithvan.com/ CREDIT UNIONS GET OUT THE VOTE (CU GOTV) CANDIDATE INFO Congressional District 1 Wenona Benally Baldenegro (Democrat) 2700 Woodlands Village Boulevard Suite 300-203 Flagstaff, AZ 86001 http://wenonaforarizona.com/ Twitter Facebook Ann Kirkpatrick (Democrat) 432 West Cattle Drive Trail Flagstaff, AZ 86001 http://www.kirkpatrickforarizona.com/ YouTube Twitter Facebook Patrick Gatti (Republican) 1100 East Whipple St. Show Low, AZ 85901 http://www.patrickgattiforcongress.com/ Gaither Martin (Republican) 476 North Harless St. Eagar, AZ 85925 http://martin4congress.com/ Twitter Facebook Jonathan Paton (Republican) PO Box 68758 Oro Valley, AZ 85737 http://paton2012.com/ YouTube Twitter Facebook Douglas Wade (Republican) PO Box 388 Sedona, AZ 86339 http://www.wadeforcongress2012.com/ YouTube Twitter Facebook CREDIT UNIONS GET OUT THE VOTE (CU GOTV) CANDIDATE INFO Congressional District 2 Ron Barber (Democrat) 4848 E Hawthorne St. Tucson, AZ 85711 http://ronbarberforcongress.com/ Twitter Facebook Matt Heinz (Democrat) PO Box 2574 Tucson, AZ 85702 http://heinzforcongress.com/ Twitter Facebook Mark Koskiniemi (Republican) PO Box 35487 Tucson, AZ 85731 http://www.koskiniemi4az8.com/ Facebook Martha McSally (Republican) P.O.