Regulation of the Microglial NADPH Oxidase by Neurotransmitters: Implications for Microglial –

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Regulation of the Microglial NADPH Oxidase by Neurotransmitters: Implications for Microglial – Regulation of the microglial NADPH oxidase by neurotransmitters: implications for microglial – neuronal interactions Emma Louise Mead UCL Institute of Neurology A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D) 1 I, Emma Louise Mead, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. 2 Acknowledgements First, I would like to thank my supervisor Dr Jennifer Pocock for giving me the opportunity to work in her lab as well as for her guidance and support throughout my research. I would also like to thank my secondary supervisor Professor Simon Heales for his advice. I would like to acknowledge the Medical Research Council and the Brain Research Trust, who funded my Ph.D. Many thanks go to Dr Simon Eaton (UCL, Institute of Child Health) for his expertise and guidance with the HPLC analysis and also to Dr Angelina Mosely (UCL, Institute of Neurology) for her expertise and support with the Flow Cytometry analysis. I would also like to thank Dr Claudie Hooper (Kings College London, Institute of Psychiatry) for her help and guidance with microglial preparations, and for the gift ofthe BV2 microglial cell line, and also for her friendship and advice. Many thanks also go to Mr Thomas Piers, and Dr Ioanna Sevastou for their friendship and encouragement, and for making the last three years thoroughly enjoyable. I would finaly like to thank Kieran, for his continued support and understanding, particularly in the final year of my studies, and many thanks go to my parents for their support, patience, understanding and encouragement throughout my Ph.D and with all decisions that I have made. 3 Abstract Neurotransmitter dysregulation and reactive oxygen species (ROS) are a hallmark of neurodegenerative disease. Microglia, the immune cells of the CNS, express three NADPH oxidase isoforms (Nox1, Nox2 and Nox4), which produce superoxide that is used as an intracellular signalling molecule, mediating the production of neurotoxic and neurotrophic factors. Microglia also express a range of neurotransmitter receptors, enabling them to respond to physiological and pathological levels of neurotransmitters. As both microglial superoxide production and neurotransmitter dysregulation are common to many neurodegenerative conditions, the interaction between microglial neurotransmitter receptor modulation and NADPH oxidase activation was investigated. Superoxide production was assessed in primary and BV2 microglia using flow cytometry, HPLC, fluorescence microscopy, and a colorometric assay. Glutamate (1 µM), GABA (100 µM) or BzATP (250 µM) induced NADPH oxidase derived superoxide production. Furthermore, antagonism of the group I mGluRs induced Nox1 and Nox2 dependent superoxide production through PKC / PI3-K pathways and p44/42ERK activation. Activation of mGluR3 induced Nox2 and Nox4 activation in a p44/42ERK and p38MAPK dependent manner, whilst activation of the group III mGluRs induced Nox2 and Nox4 activation dependent on p38MAPK signalling. Microglial NMDA receptor activation promoted superoxide production that was dependent on p38MAPK activation. Modulation of the microglial glutamate receptors mediated protection of cerebellar granule neurons, as deomstrated using microglial conditioned media assays. Activation of the microglial GABAA receptor induced Nox1 activation through PKC and p38MAPK signalling which mediated TNFα release and neurotoxicity, whilst P2Y2/4 receptor activation mediated Nox1 activation through PI3-K and p38MAPK with neurotoxic consequences. The findings in this thesis show that microglial Nox2 and Nox4 activation has neuroprotective consequences, whereas 4 microglial Nox1 activation mediates neurotoxicity. Modulation of the microglial neurotransmitter receptors therefore has ramifications for the survival of neurons in degenerative diseases, which could have important consequences for the production of future therapies for neurodegenerative conditions. 5 Table of Contents Title …………………………………………………………………………………………...1 Declaration ……………………………………………………………………………………2 Acknowledgements …………………………………………………………………………...3 Abstract………………………………………………………………………………………..4 List of Figures and Tables ………………………………………………………………….10 List of Abbreviations ………………………………………………………………………...16 1. Introduction…………………………………………………………………………..21 1.1 Cells of the Central Nervous System ............................................................................ 22 1.1.1 Neurons ................................................................................................................ 222 1.1.2 Glia ...................................................................................................................... 255 1.1.2.1 Astrocytes .............................................................................................................. 26 1.1.2.2 Oligodendrocytes ................................................................................................... 28 1.1.2.3 Ependymal cells ..................................................................................................... 30 1.1.2.4 Brain macrophages ................................................................................................ 30 1.2 Microglia in heath and disease .................................................................................. 31 1.3 Micrioglial activation in neurodegeneration ................................................................. 35 1.4 The immune system ...................................................................................................... 37 1.4.1 The brain as an immune privileged organ ............................................................. 37 1.5 Reactive oxygen species in the central nervous system ................................................ 41 1.5.1 Pathology and physiology of ROS and the immune response............................... 42 1.5.2 Production of superoxide by the NADPH oxidase ................................................ 44 1.5.3 NADPH oxidase isoforms ..................................................................................... 48 1.5.4 NADPH oxidase in the CNS ................................................................................. 50 1.5.4.1 Microglial expression of the NADPH oxidase ...................................................... 51 1.5.4.1.1 Microglial NADPH oxidase in physiological conditions ............................... 52 1.5.4.1.2 Microglial NADPH oxidase in pathology ...................................................... 54 1.6 Neurotransmitter and neurotransmitter receptor dysregulation in neurodegeneration . 60 1.6.1 Glutamate............................................................................................................... 61 1.6.2 GABA .................................................................................................................... 63 1.6.3 ATP ........................................................................................................................ 64 6 1.6.4 Neurotransmitter receptor modulation of microglial activation in neurodegeneration and involvement of ROS ....................................................................... 67 1.7 Aims and objectives ...................................................................................................... 80 2. Materials and Methods.........................................................................................................82 2.1 Materials ....................................................................................................................... 83 2.2 Methods......................................................................................................................... 85 2.2.1 Cell Culture ............................................................................................................... 85 2.2.1.1 BV2 cell culture ..................................................................................................... 85 2.2.1.2 Primary microglial culture ..................................................................................... 86 2.2.1.3 Cerebellar Granule Cell (CGC) culture ............................................................... 889 2.2.2 Cell treatments........................................................................................................... 90 2.2.2.1 Treatment of primary and BV2 microglia ............................................................. 90 2.2.2.2 Treatment of CGCs ................................................................................................ 92 2.2.2.3 Conditioned media assays ..................................................................................... 92 2.2.3 Cell imaging .............................................................................................................. 93 2.2.3.1 Immunocytochemistry ........................................................................................... 94 2.2.3.2 Assessment of cell death ........................................................................................ 95 2.2.4 Measurement of superoxide production .................................................................... 96 2.2.4.1 NBT detection of intracellular superoxide ............................................................ 98 2.2.4.1.1 NBT assay optimisation ................................................................................... 100 2.2.4.1.2 Optimised
Recommended publications
  • The G Protein-Coupled Glutamate Receptors As Novel Molecular Targets in Schizophrenia Treatment— a Narrative Review
    Journal of Clinical Medicine Review The G Protein-Coupled Glutamate Receptors as Novel Molecular Targets in Schizophrenia Treatment— A Narrative Review Waldemar Kryszkowski 1 and Tomasz Boczek 2,* 1 General Psychiatric Ward, Babinski Memorial Hospital in Lodz, 91229 Lodz, Poland; [email protected] 2 Department of Molecular Neurochemistry, Medical University of Lodz, 92215 Lodz, Poland * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Schizophrenia is a severe neuropsychiatric disease with an unknown etiology. The research into the neurobiology of this disease led to several models aimed at explaining the link between perturbations in brain function and the manifestation of psychotic symptoms. The glutamatergic hypothesis postulates that disrupted glutamate neurotransmission may mediate cognitive and psychosocial impairments by affecting the connections between the cortex and the thalamus. In this regard, the greatest attention has been given to ionotropic NMDA receptor hypofunction. However, converging data indicates metabotropic glutamate receptors as crucial for cognitive and psychomotor function. The distribution of these receptors in the brain regions related to schizophrenia and their regulatory role in glutamate release make them promising molecular targets for novel antipsychotics. This article reviews the progress in the research on the role of metabotropic glutamate receptors in schizophrenia etiopathology. Citation: Kryszkowski, W.; Boczek, T. The G Protein-Coupled Glutamate Keywords: schizophrenia; metabotropic glutamate receptors; positive allosteric modulators; negative Receptors as Novel Molecular Targets allosteric modulators; drug development; animal models of schizophrenia; clinical trials in Schizophrenia Treatment—A Narrative Review. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 1475. https://doi.org/10.3390/ jcm10071475 1. Introduction Academic Editors: Andreas Reif, Schizophrenia is a common debilitating disease affecting about 0.3–1% of the human Blazej Misiak and Jerzy Samochowiec population worldwide [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Dissection of G-Protein Coupled Receptor Signaling and Oligomerization
    MOLECULAR DISSECTION OF G-PROTEIN COUPLED RECEPTOR SIGNALING AND OLIGOMERIZATION BY MICHAEL RIZZO A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Biology December, 2019 Winston-Salem, North Carolina Approved By: Erik C. Johnson, Ph.D. Advisor Wayne E. Pratt, Ph.D. Chair Pat C. Lord, Ph.D. Gloria K. Muday, Ph.D. Ke Zhang, Ph.D. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would first like to thank my advisor, Dr. Erik Johnson, for his support, expertise, and leadership during my time in his lab. Without him, the work herein would not be possible. I would also like to thank the members of my committee, Dr. Gloria Muday, Dr. Ke Zhang, Dr. Wayne Pratt, and Dr. Pat Lord, for their guidance and advice that helped improve the quality of the research presented here. I would also like to thank members of the Johnson lab, both past and present, for being valuable colleagues and friends. I would especially like to thank Dr. Jason Braco, Dr. Jon Fisher, Dr. Jake Saunders, and Becky Perry, all of whom spent a great deal of time offering me advice, proofreading grants and manuscripts, and overall supporting me through the ups and downs of the research process. Finally, I would like to thank my family, both for instilling in me a passion for knowledge and education, and for their continued support. In particular, I would like to thank my wife Emerald – I am forever indebted to you for your support throughout this process, and I will never forget the sacrifices you made to help me get to where I am today.
    [Show full text]
  • GABA Receptors
    D Reviews • BIOTREND Reviews • BIOTREND Reviews • BIOTREND Reviews • BIOTREND Reviews Review No.7 / 1-2011 GABA receptors Wolfgang Froestl , CNS & Chemistry Expert, AC Immune SA, PSE Building B - EPFL, CH-1015 Lausanne, Phone: +41 21 693 91 43, FAX: +41 21 693 91 20, E-mail: [email protected] GABA Activation of the GABA A receptor leads to an influx of chloride GABA ( -aminobutyric acid; Figure 1) is the most important and ions and to a hyperpolarization of the membrane. 16 subunits with γ most abundant inhibitory neurotransmitter in the mammalian molecular weights between 50 and 65 kD have been identified brain 1,2 , where it was first discovered in 1950 3-5 . It is a small achiral so far, 6 subunits, 3 subunits, 3 subunits, and the , , α β γ δ ε θ molecule with molecular weight of 103 g/mol and high water solu - and subunits 8,9 . π bility. At 25°C one gram of water can dissolve 1.3 grams of GABA. 2 Such a hydrophilic molecule (log P = -2.13, PSA = 63.3 Å ) cannot In the meantime all GABA A receptor binding sites have been eluci - cross the blood brain barrier. It is produced in the brain by decarb- dated in great detail. The GABA site is located at the interface oxylation of L-glutamic acid by the enzyme glutamic acid decarb- between and subunits. Benzodiazepines interact with subunit α β oxylase (GAD, EC 4.1.1.15). It is a neutral amino acid with pK = combinations ( ) ( ) , which is the most abundant combi - 1 α1 2 β2 2 γ2 4.23 and pK = 10.43.
    [Show full text]
  • A 3-Fold Kernel Approach for Characterizing Late Onset Alzheimer’S Disease
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/397760; this version posted August 22, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. A 3-fold kernel approach for characterizing Late Onset Alzheimer’s Disease Margherita Squillarioa,*, Federico Tomasia, Veronica Tozzoa, Annalisa Barlaa and Daniela Ubertib “for the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative**” aDIBRIS, University of Genoa, Via Dodecaneso 35, I-16146 Genova, Italy. E-mail address: {squillario, federico.tomasi, veronica.tozzo}@dibris.unige.it, [email protected] bDepartment of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Viale Europa 11, 25123, Brescia, Italy. E-mail address: [email protected] * Corresponding author and Lead Contact. Tel: +39-010-353-6707; Fax: +39-010-353- 6699. ** Data used in preparation of this article were obtained from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database (adni.loni.usc.edu). As such, the investigators within the ADNI contributed to the design and implementation of ADNI and/or provided data but did not participate in analysis or writing of this report. A complete listing of ADNI investigators can be found at: http://adni.loni.usc.edu/wp- content/uploads/how_to_apply/ADNI_Acknowledgement_List.pdf 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/397760; this version posted August 22, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.
    [Show full text]
  • GABA Receptor Crosstalk the Inhibitory Neurotransmitter GABA Activates Both Ionotropic
    RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS IN BRIEF SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION GABA receptor crosstalk The inhibitory neurotransmitter GABA activates both ionotropic type A GABA receptors (GABAARs) and metabotropic GABAB receptors (GABABRs). Two independent studies in rat brain slices now show that activation of postsynaptic GABABRs enhances signalling through extrasynaptic GABAARs. Activity-dependent changes in GABA concentration activate postsynaptic GABABRs leading to slow inhibition, whereas high-affinity GABAARs at extrasynaptic sites are activated tonically by ambient GABA. This tonic inhibitory tone has been implicated in synaptic integration, anxiety-related behaviours and seizure susceptibility. Tao et al. show that activation of postsynaptic GABABRs enhances GABAAR-mediated currents caused by exogenous GABA or the GABABR agonist baclofen in dentate gyrus granule cells (DGGCs) but not in CA1 pyramidal neurons or cortical layer 2/3 pyramidal neurons. Connelly et al. report similar crosstalk in thalamocortical neurons of the ventrobasal thalamus and cerebellar granule cells as well as in DGGCs. ORIGINAL RESEARCH PAPERS Tao, W. et al. Postsynaptic GABAB receptors enhance extrasynaptic GABAA receptor function in dentate gyrus granule cells. J. Neurosci. 33, 3738–3743 (2013) | Connelly, W. M. et al. GABAB receptors regulate extrasynaptic GABAA receptors. J. Neurosci. 33, 3780–3785 (2013) SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION JACOB reveals the origin of NMDAR signals Signalling through NMDA receptors (NMDARs) can trigger cell death or survival depending on whether activation of such receptors occurs at extrasynaptic or synaptic sites, respectively. It is unclear how these opposing signals are communicated to and discriminated by the nucleus, but the authors of this study show that differential phosphorylation of JACOB relays the origin of the NMDAR signal to the nucleus.
    [Show full text]
  • Activation of Group I Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors Reduces Neuronal Apoptosis but Increases Necrotic Cell Death in Vitro
    Cell Death and Differentiation (2000) 7, 470 ± 476 ã 2000 Macmillan Publishers Ltd All rights reserved 1350-9047/00 $15.00 www.nature.com/cdd Activation of group I metabotropic glutamate receptors reduces neuronal apoptosis but increases necrotic cell death in vitro JW Allen1,2, SM Knoblach1,3 and AI Faden*,1,3,4 hydroxyphenylglycine; DHPG, dihydroxyphenylglycine; MK801, dizocilpine; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; MCPG, -methyl-4- 1 Institute for Cognitive and Computational Sciences, Georgetown University carboxyphenylglycine; mGluR, metabotropic glutamate receptors; Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007, USA OGD, oxygen-glucose deprivation; TBI, traumatic brain injury 2 Interdisciplinary Program in Neuroscience, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007, USA 3 Department of Neuroscience, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007, USA Introduction 4 Department of Pharmacology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007, USA Activation of both ionotropic and metabotropic glutamate * Corresponding author: AI Faden, EP-04 Research Building, 3970 Reservoir receptors has been implicated in the pathophysiology of Road, N.W. Washington, DC 20007, USA. Tel: (202) 687 0492; Fax: (202) 687 stroke and CNS trauma. It has been well established that 0617; E-mail: [email protected] blockade of ionotropic glutamate receptors provides neuro- protection in vitro and in vivo.1±5 Recent studies have suggested that metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluR) Received 23.7.99; revised 19.1.00; accepted 7.2.00 are also activated following traumatic brain injury (TBI)6±9 or Edited by FD Miller cerebral ischemia,10 or in vitro neuronal trauma7,9 or ischemia,11,12 leading to neuroprotection or exacerbation depending upon the mGluR subtype activated.
    [Show full text]
  • Buyers' Guide
    Buyers’ Guide S119 Buyers’ Guide Suppliers’ Contact Details Amersham Biosciences UK Limited The Menarini Group Amersham Place www.menarini.com Little Chalfont Buckinghamshire HP7 9NA Moravek Biochemicals UK 577 Mercury Lane www5.amershambiosciences.com Brea Ca 92821 Avanti Polar Lipids Inc USA 700 Industrial Park Drive www.moravek.com Alabaster AL 35007 Roche Pharmaceuticals USA F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd www.avantilipids.com Pharmaceuticals Division Grenzacherstrasse 124 Bachem Bioscience Inc. CH-4070 Basel 3700 Horizon Drive Switzerland King of Prussia Telephone þ 41-61-688 1111 PA 19406 Unites States Telefax þ 41-61-691 9391 www.bachem.org www.roche.com Boehringer Ingelheim Ltd Ellesfield Avenue SIGMA Chemicals/Sigma-Aldrich Bracknell P.O. Box 14508 Berks RG12 8YS St. Louis, MO 63178-9916 UK USA www.boehringer-ingelheim.co.uk www.sigma-aldrich.com Calbiochem Tocris Cookson Ltd. EMD Biosciences, Inc. Northpoint, Fourth Way 10394 Pacific Center Court Avonmouth San Diego Bristol CA 92121 BS11 8TA USA UK www.emdbiosciences.com www.tocris.com S120 Buyers’ Guide Compound Supplier Buyers’ Guide a-methyl-5-HT a-Methyl-5-hydroxytryptamine Tocris ab-meATP ab-methylene-adenosine 5’-triphosphate Sigma-Aldrich bg-meATP bg-methylene-adenosine 5’-triphosphate Sigma-Aldrich (-)-(S)-BAYK8664 (-)-(S)-methyl-1,4-dihydro-2,6-dimethyl-3-nitro-4-(2-trifluromethylphenyl)-pyridine-5-carboxylate Sigma-Aldrich, Tocris (+)7-OH-DPAT (+)-7-hydroxy-2-aminopropylaminotetralin Sigma-Aldrich a-dendrotoxin Sigma-Aldrich (RS)PPG (R,S)-4-phosphonophenylglycine Tocris (S)-3,4-DCPG
    [Show full text]
  • Amino Acids by G.C.BARRETT
    1 Amino Acids By G.C.BARRETT 1 Introduction The chemistry and biochemistry of the amino acids as represented in the 1992 literature, is covered in this Chapter. The usual policy for this Specialist Periodical Report has been continued, with almost exclusive attention in this Chapter, to the literature covering the natural occurrence, chemistry, and analysis methodology for the amino acids. Routine literature covering the natural distribution of well-known amino acids is excluded. The discussion offered is brief for most of the papers cited, so that adequate commentary can be offered for papers describing significant advances in synthetic methodology and mechanistically-interesting chemistry. Patent literature is almost wholly excluded but this is easily reached through Section 34 of Chemical Abstracts. It is worth noting that the relative number of patents carried in Section 34 of Chemical Abstracts is increasing (e.g. Section 34 of Chem-Abs., 1992, Vol. 116, Issue No. 11 contains 45 patent abstracts, 77 abstracts of papers and reviews), reflecting the perception that amino acids and peptides are capable of returning rich commercial rewards due to their important physiological roles and consequent pharmaceutical status. However, there is no slowing of the flow of journal papers and secondary literature, as far as the amino acids are concerned. The coverage in this Chapter is arranged into sections as used in all previous Volumes of this Specialist Periodical Report, and major Journals and Chemical Abstracts (to Volume 118, issue 11) have
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Glutamate Receptors I: Current Understanding of Their Biology
    J Toxicol Pathol 2008; 21: 25–51 Review A Review of Glutamate Receptors I: Current Understanding of Their Biology Colin G. Rousseaux1 1Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Abstract: Seventy years ago it was discovered that glutamate is abundant in the brain and that it plays a central role in brain metabolism. However, it took the scientific community a long time to realize that glutamate also acts as a neurotransmitter. Glutamate is an amino acid and brain tissue contains as much as 5 – 15 mM glutamate per kg depending on the region, which is more than of any other amino acid. The main motivation for the ongoing research on glutamate is due to the role of glutamate in the signal transduction in the nervous systems of apparently all complex living organisms, including man. Glutamate is considered to be the major mediator of excitatory signals in the mammalian central nervous system and is involved in most aspects of normal brain function including cognition, memory and learning. In this review, the basic biology of the excitatory amino acids glutamate, glutamate receptors, GABA, and glycine will first be explored. In the second part of this review, the known pathophysiology and pathology will be described. (J Toxicol Pathol 2008; 21: 25–51) Key words: glutamate, glycine, GABA, glutamate receptors, ionotropic, metabotropic, NMDA, AMPA, review Introduction and Overview glycine), peptides (vasopressin, somatostatin, neurotensin, etc.), and monoamines (norepinephrine, dopamine and In the first decades of the 20th century, research into the serotonin) plus acetylcholine. chemical mediation of the “autonomous” (autonomic) Glutamatergic synaptic transmission in the mammalian nervous system (ANS) was an area that received much central nervous system (CNS) was slowly established over a research activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence for Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor Activation in the Induction of Depolarization-Induced Suppression of Inhibition in Hippocampal CA1
    The Journal of Neuroscience, July 1, 1998, 18(13):4870–4882 Evidence for Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor Activation in the Induction of Depolarization-Induced Suppression of Inhibition in Hippocampal CA1 Wade Morishita, Sergei A. Kirov, and Bradley E. Alger Department of Physiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201 Depolarization-induced suppression of inhibition (DSI) is a tran- (1S,3R)-ACPD-induced IPSC suppression and markedly re- sient reduction of GABAA receptor-mediated IPSCs that is duced DSI, whereas group III antagonists had no effect on DSI. mediated by a retrograde signal from principal cells to interneu- Many other similarities between DSI and the (1S,3R)-ACPD- rons. Using whole-cell recordings, we tested the hypothesis induced suppression of IPSCs also were found. Our data sug- that mGluRs are involved in the DSI process in hippocampal gest that a glutamate-like substance released from pyramidal CA1, as has been proposed for cerebellar DSI. Group II mGluR cells could mediate CA1 DSI by reducing GABA release from agonists failed to affect either evoked monosynaptic IPSCs or interneurons via the activation of group I mGluRs. DSI, and forskolin, which blocks cerebellar DSI, did not affect CA1 DSI. Group I and group III mGluR agonists reduced IPSCs, Key words: IPSP; GABA; retrograde signal; voltage clamp; but only group I agonists occluded DSI. (S)-MCPG blocked mGluR; synaptic inhibition Depolarization-induced suppression of inhibition (DSI) is a phe- decrease cAMP production (Conn et al., 1994), which can reduce nomenon seen in both hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cells (Pitler GABA release (Capogna et al., 1995).
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Functionality of Proteins Involved in GPCR and G Protein Signaling: Making Sense of Structure–Function Continuum with In
    Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (2019) 76:4461–4492 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-019-03276-1 Cellular andMolecular Life Sciences REVIEW Multi‑functionality of proteins involved in GPCR and G protein signaling: making sense of structure–function continuum with intrinsic disorder‑based proteoforms Alexander V. Fonin1 · April L. Darling2 · Irina M. Kuznetsova1 · Konstantin K. Turoverov1,3 · Vladimir N. Uversky2,4 Received: 5 August 2019 / Revised: 5 August 2019 / Accepted: 12 August 2019 / Published online: 19 August 2019 © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019 Abstract GPCR–G protein signaling system recognizes a multitude of extracellular ligands and triggers a variety of intracellular signal- ing cascades in response. In humans, this system includes more than 800 various GPCRs and a large set of heterotrimeric G proteins. Complexity of this system goes far beyond a multitude of pair-wise ligand–GPCR and GPCR–G protein interactions. In fact, one GPCR can recognize more than one extracellular signal and interact with more than one G protein. Furthermore, one ligand can activate more than one GPCR, and multiple GPCRs can couple to the same G protein. This defnes an intricate multifunctionality of this important signaling system. Here, we show that the multifunctionality of GPCR–G protein system represents an illustrative example of the protein structure–function continuum, where structures of the involved proteins represent a complex mosaic of diferently folded regions (foldons, non-foldons, unfoldons, semi-foldons, and inducible foldons). The functionality of resulting highly dynamic conformational ensembles is fne-tuned by various post-translational modifcations and alternative splicing, and such ensembles can undergo dramatic changes at interaction with their specifc partners.
    [Show full text]
  • Microglial Glutathione and Glutamate: Regulation Mechanisms
    Microglial glutathione and glutamate: Regulation mechanisms Victoria Anne Honey Fry UCL Institute of Neurology A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) 1 I, Victoria Fry, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. 2 Abstract Microglia, the immune cells of the central nervous system (CNS), are important in the protection of the CNS, but may be implicated in the pathogenesis of neuroinflammatory disease. Upon activation, microglia produce reactive oxygen and nitrogen species; intracellular antioxidants are therefore likely to be important in their self-defence. Here, it was confirmed that cultured microglia contain high levels of glutathione, the predominant intracellular antioxidant in mammalian cells. The activation of microglia with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or LPS + interferon- was shown to affect their glutathione levels. GSH levels in primary microglia and those of the BV-2 cell line increased upon activation, whilst levels in N9 microglial cells decreased. - Microglial glutathione synthesis is dependent upon cystine uptake via the xc transporter, which exchanges cystine and glutamate. Glutamate is an excitatory neurotransmitter whose extracellular concentration is tightly regulated by excitatory amino acid transporters, as high levels cause toxicity to neurones and other CNS cell types through overstimulation of - glutamate receptors or by causing reversal of xc transporters. Following exposure to LPS, increased extracellular glutamate and increased levels of messenger ribonucleic acid - (mRNA) for xCT, the specific subunit of xc , were observed in BV-2 and primary microglial cells, suggesting upregulated GSH synthesis.
    [Show full text]