DOCSLIB.ORG

Judicial Conduct Committee of the Judicial Services Commission

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Judicial Conduct Committee of the Judicial Services Commission JUDICIAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE OF THE JUDICIAL SERVICES COMMISSION In re: Complaint by Professor Anthony Joseph Arkin on behalf of the South African Zionist Federation RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT AGAINST JUDGE DESAI ___________________________________________________________________ A INTRODUCTION 1. The complaint by Professor Anthony Joseph Arkin on behalf of the South African Zionist Federation (SAZF) dated 9 June 2021 against Judge Desai was referred to the Judicial Conduct Committee (JCC). Khampepe ADCJ, the Acting Chairperson of the JCC, issued a ruling in terms of section 17(1)(b) of the Judicial Service Commission Act 9 of 1994 (the Act), designating Dambuza JA, a member of the JCC, to determine the merits of the complaint. 2. Dambuza JA issued an invitation, in terms of section 17(3) of the Act, for Judge Desai to respond in writing to the allegations levelled against him by the SAZF. 3. This response is submitted on behalf and on the instructions of Judge Desai and addresses the merits of the complaint. To the extent that the contents of this response are inconsistent with the allegations contained in the complaint, such allegations must be taken to be denied. Judge Desai, furthermore, reserves his right to respond further to any new matter contained in the Complainant’s reply to this response. 4. This response is structured as follows: 4.1. Part B sets out the details of the parties. 4.2. Part C sets out the principles which underpin this response. 4.3. Part D provides an ad seriatim response to each factual allegation in the complaint. 1 4.4. Part E draws the necessary conclusion, and requests the dismissal of the complaint. B THE PARTIES The Complainant 5. The deponent to the complaint is a resident in Israel, an honorary life president of the KwaZulu Natal Zionist Council, and a member of the South African Zionist Federation (SAZF). 6. The SAZF is an avowedly Zionist pro-Israel lobby group. 7. It must be emphasized that this is not Judge Desai’s description of the SAZF. It is the description of the SAZF by the SAZF itself. 8. According to its website the SAZF: ”..looks after matters relating to Israel and its image in South Africa. As advocates for Israel in this country, our mission is to build strong support and love for the Land and State of Israel. This support remains powerful among the SA Jewish community and millions outside the community. We work pro-actively to reduce the amount of anti-Israel sentiment in South African political, religious, and cultural communities through education, advocacy, and lobbying.”1 9. One of the core objectives of the SAZF is “Israel Advocacy and Activities”. 10. The SAZF website states: “…The South African Jewish community has always been proudly Zionistic, standing our ground and defending Israel on a daily basis. The SAZF’s role is to do just that by looking after matters relating to Israel and its image in South Africa. As steadfast advocates for Israel, our mission is to build strong support and love for the State of Israel and its lands. This support remains unwavering among the SA Jewish community. ‘The Fed’ also works pro-actively to reduce anti-Israel sentiment in South African political, religious, and cultural 1 https://www.sazf.org/about-us 2 communities. This is accomplished through education, advocacy, and lobbying.”2 11. It is clear that the complaint against Judge Desai by the SAZF forms part of the pro-Israel activities of the SAZF and that the lodging of the complaint is consistent with the aims and objectives of the SAZF. In other words, the complaint against Judge Desai has been lodged with the express aim of furthering the pro-Israel goals and political objectives of the SAZF. 12. This is evident from the website of the SAZF where the complaint against Judge Desai, is listed under the heading “Current Issues”.3 The Respondent 13. Judge Desai matriculated at the Trafalgar High School in District Six, Cape Town, and was compelled to pursue tertiary education at The University of Durban Westville (Kwazulu-Natal) because of the Separate Universities Act then being rigidly enforced. He started his professional career in 1976. First as a clerk to Mr AM Omar (later to become South Africa’s first post-apartheid Minister of Justice) and then (1978) as an attorney on Mr Omar’s staff. 14. The historic events in progress at the time – the political and social unrest in response to settler colonialism and apartheid – determined the nature of his practice for the ensuing years. In 1981 he became an advocate and practiced at the Cape Bar until 30 June 1995. During his years as an advocate, he was, inter alia, a prominent human rights lawyer and activist and appeared as legal counsel in many important and politically significant matters. His clients included community leaders, human rights activists, several accused in terrorism cases during the Apartheid era, and persons dispossessed of their land rights in Cape Town, in the Eastern Cape and in the North-West Province. 15. He was a founder member of the National Association of Democratic Lawyers (NADEL) which vigorously campaigned for the transformation of the apartheid era legal profession and judiciary. Prior to becoming a judge he was the National Vice-President of NADEL. He was elevated to the bench on 1 July 1995 by the Judicial Service Commission and served as a judge of the Western Cape High Court for 25 years. As an attorney and also as an advocate, Judge Desai chaired the Woodstock Salt River Walmer Estate Civic Association (WOSAWA) which fought and supported the campaigns to save the land in District 6 for restitution purposes. He served as a council member 2 https://www.sazf.org/israel-advocacy 3 https://www.sazf.org/issues 3 and chairperson of the Cape Peninsula University of Technology. Since 1996 he was the deputy chairperson of the Foundation for Human Rights in South Africa until his retirement in April 2021. C PRINCIPLES UNDERPINNING THIS RESPONSE 16. At the outset, Judge Desai submits that his response to the complaint set out below must be considered in the context of the following principles to which he subscribes and which are relevant to this complaint. 17. Firstly, silence by judges in the face of injustice and violations of basic human rights, particularly given the history of South Africa, is inconsistent with judicial office.4 It is precisely for that reason that the oath required of judicial officers under section 6 of schedule 2 of the Constitution, requires a judge to swear or affirm that he or she will uphold and protect the human rights entrenched in the Constitution. Judicial officers, therefore, have a particular duty to confront injustice, promote equality for all under the law and condemn racism in all its forms.5 18. Secondly, judges do not exist in isolation. They do not perform their functions in a cloistered monastery isolated from society. They are members of the community with their own beliefs, opinions, and sympathies. As the Constitutional Court has explained: 4 Cameron, Davis & Marcus ‘The Administration of Justice, Law Reform and Jurisprudence’, Annual Survey of South African Law, 1993, p 795. See also Richard Goldstone ‘Do Judges Speak Out?’ (1994) 111 SALJ 258 at 259. 5 See for example the recent June 2020 public statement signed by seven justices by the California Supreme Court, “"In view of recent events in our communities and through the nation, we are at an inflection point in our history. It is all too clear that the legacy of past injustices inflicted on African Americans persists powerfully and tragically to this day. Each of us has a duty to recognize there is much unfinished and essential work that must be done to make equality and inclusion an everyday reality for all. We must, as a society, honestly recognize our unacceptable failings and continue to build on our shared strengths. We must acknowledge that, in addition to overt bigotry, inattention and complacency have allowed tacit toleration of the intolerable. These are burdens particularly borne by African Americans as well as Indigenous Peoples singled out for disparate treatment in the United States Constitution when it was ratified. We have an opportunity, in this moment, to overcome division, accept responsibility for our troubled past, and forge a unified future for all who share devotion to this country and its ideals. We state clearly and without equivocation that we condemn racism in all its forms: conscious, unconscious, institutional, structural, historic, and continuing. We say this as persons who believe all members of humanity deserve equal respect and dignity; as citizens committed to building a more perfect Union; and as leaders of an institution whose fundamental mission is to ensure equal justice under the law for every single person. In our profession and in our daily lives, we must confront the injustices that have led millions to call for a justice system that works fairly for everyone. Each member of this court, along with the court as a whole, embraces this obligation. As members of the legal profession sworn to uphold our fundamental constitutional values, we will not and must not rest until the promise of equal justice under law is, for all our people, a living truth." https://newsroom.courts.ca.gov/news/supreme-court-california-issues-statement-equality-and- inclusion 4 “…absolute neutrality” is something of a chimera in the judicial context. This is because judges are human. They are unavoidably the product of their own life experiences, and the perspective thus derived inevitably and distinctively informs each judge’s performance of his or her judicial duties.”6 True impartiality does not require a judicial officer to have no sympathies or opinions when it comes to violations of human rights, injustices and inequality.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Constitutional Court of South Africa: Rights Interpretation and Comparative Constitutional Law
    THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA: RIGHTS INTERPRETATION AND COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW Hoyt Webb- I do hereby swear that I will in my capacity asJudge of the Constitu- tional Court of the Republic of South Africa uphold and protect the Constitution of the Republic and the fundamental rights entrenched therein and in so doing administerjustice to all persons alike with- out fear,favour or prejudice, in accordance with the Constitution and the Law of the Republic. So help me God. The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, Schedule 3 (Oaths of Office and Solemn Affirmations), Act No. 200, 1993. I swear that, asJudge of the ConstitutionalCourt, I will be faithful to the Republic of South Africa, will uphold and protect the Consti- tution and the human rights entrenched in it, and will administer justice to all persons alike withwut fear,favour or prejudice, in ac- cordancewith the Constitution and the Law. So help me God. The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, Schedule 2 (Oaths and Solemn Affirmations), Act 108 of 1996. I. INTRODUCTION In 1993, South Africa adopted a transitional or interim Constitu- tion (also referred to as the "IC"), enshrining a non-racial, multiparty democracy, based on respect for universal rights.' This uras a monu- mental achievement considering the complex and often horrific his- tory of the Republic and the increasing racial, ethnic and religious tensions worldwide.2 A new society, however, could not be created by Hoyt Webb is an associate at Brown and Wood, LLP in NewYork City and a term member of the Council on Foreign Relations.
    [Show full text]
  • Appointments to South Africa's Constitutional Court Since 1994
    Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 15 July 2015 Version of attached le: Accepted Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: Johnson, Rachel E. (2014) 'Women as a sign of the new? Appointments to the South Africa's Constitutional Court since 1994.', Politics gender., 10 (4). pp. 595-621. Further information on publisher's website: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X14000439 Publisher's copyright statement: c Copyright The Women and Politics Research Section of the American 2014. This paper has been published in a revised form, subsequent to editorial input by Cambridge University Press in 'Politics gender' (10: 4 (2014) 595-621) http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=PAG Additional information: Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Durham University Library, Stockton Road, Durham DH1 3LY, United Kingdom Tel : +44 (0)191 334 3042 | Fax : +44 (0)191 334 2971 https://dro.dur.ac.uk Rachel E. Johnson, Politics & Gender, Vol. 10, Issue 4 (2014), pp 595-621. Women as a Sign of the New? Appointments to South Africa’s Constitutional Court since 1994.
    [Show full text]
  • WT/2 Col Template
    THEWORLDTODAY.ORG JANUARY 2010 PAGE 16 INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT PRichard Deicker, DIREaCTOR, HUMANcRIGHTS WATeCH’S INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE PROGRAMME, RECENT SPEAKER AT THE CHATHAM HOUSE INTERN &Justice The International Criminal Court believes it is marginalising Sudan’s President Omar al-Bashir following his indictment on charges related to atrocities in Darfur. He decided to pull out of an Islamic summit in Istanbul in November and earlier cancelled plans to visit a number of African states. But the policy of seeking justice in such cases where peace efforts are underway, is deeply controversial. HE THORNY DEBATE OVER WHETHER PURSUING However, an analysis of the details documented in our justice for grave international crimes interferes recent report, Selling Justice Short: Why Accountability with peace negotiations has intensified as Matters for Peace, shows that out-of-hand dismissal of justice the possibility of abusive national leaders often proves shortsighted. We believe that those who want to being tried for such crimes has increased. forgo justice need to consider the facts more carefully, many t In part this is because of the establishment contradict oft-repeated assumptions. Because the of the International Criminal Court (ICC) which is mandated consequences for people at risk are so great, decisions on these to investigate and prosecute war crimes, crimes against important issues need to be fully informed. humanity, and genocide in ongoing conflicts. The call to suspend or ‘sequence’ justice in exchange for a possible end to a conflict has arisen in conjunction with the court’s work HIGH PRICE in Congo, Uganda, and most especially Darfur, with the From the perspective of many victims of atrocities, as well arrest warrant against a sitting head of state, Sudan’s as human rights and international law standards, justice for President Omar al-Bashir.
    [Show full text]
  • Dc/Judges Speak Out?
    DC/JUDGES SPEAK OUT? * Richard Goldstone 36th Alfred and Winifred Hoernle Memorial Lecture Delivered in Johannesburg on 10 February 1993 Do Judges Speak Out? MR JUSTICE RICHARD GOLDSTONE SOUTH AFRICAN INSTITUTE OF RACE RELATIONS JOHANNESBURG 1993 Published by the South African Institute of Race Relations Auden House, 68 De Korte Street, Braamfontein, Johannesburg, 2001 South Africa ® South African Institute of Race Relations, 1993 PD8/93 ISBN 0-86982431-7 Members of the media are free to reprint or report information, either in whole or in part, contained in this publication on the strict understanding that the South African Institute of Race Relations is acknowledged. Otherwise, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electrical, mechanical, photocopy, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Printed by Galvin & Sales, Cape Town PREVIOUS HOERNLE LECTURES J H Hoftneyr, Christian principles and race problems (1945) E G Malherbe, Race attitudes and education (1946) I D Macrone, Group conflicts and race prejudice (1947) A W Hoernle, Penal reform and race relations (1948) W M Macmillan, Africa beyond the Union (1949) E H Brookes, We come of age (1950) H J van Eck, Some aspects of the South African industrial revolution (1951) S H Frankel, Some reflections on civilization in Africa (1952) A R R Brown, Outlook for Africa (1953) E Ross, Colour and Christian community (1954) T B Davie, Education and race relations in South Africa (1955)
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Frank Michelman Constitutional Court Oral History Project 28Th
    Frank Michelman Constitutional Court Oral History Project 28th February 2013 Int This is an interview with Professor Frank Michelman, and it’s the 28th of February 2013. Frank, thank you so much for agreeing to participate in the Constitutional Court Oral History Project, we really appreciate your time. FM I’m very much honoured by your inviting me to participate and I’m happy to do so. Int Thank you. I’ve not had the opportunity to interview you before, and I wondered whether you could talk about early childhood memories, and some of the formative experiences that may have led you down a legal and academic professional trajectory? FM Well, that’s going to be difficult, because…because I didn’t have any notion at all prior to my senior year in college, the year before I entered law school, that I would be going to law school. I hadn’t formed, that I can recall, any plan, hope, ambition, in that direction at all. To the extent that I had any distinct career notion in mind during the years before I wound up going to law school? It would have been an academic career, possibly in the field of history, in which I was moderately interested and which was my concentration in college. I had formed a more or less definite idea of applying to graduate programs in history, and turning myself into a history professor. Probably United States history. United States history, or maybe something along the line of what’s now called the field of ideas, which I was calling intellectual history in those days.
    [Show full text]
  • New South African Constitution and Ethnic Division, the Stephen Ellmann New York Law School, [email protected]
    digitalcommons.nyls.edu Faculty Scholarship Articles & Chapters 1994 New South African Constitution and Ethnic Division, The Stephen Ellmann New York Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/fac_articles_chapters Recommended Citation 26 Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 5 (1994-1995) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at DigitalCommons@NYLS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles & Chapters by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@NYLS. THE NEW SOUTH AFRICAN CONSTITUTION AND ETHNIC DIVISION by Stephen Ellmann* I. INTRODUCTION In an era of ethnic slaughter in countries from Bosnia to Rwanda, the peril of ethnic division cannot be ignored. Reducing that peril by constitutional means is no simple task, for when ethnic groups pull in different directions a free country can only produce harmony between them by persuading each to honor some claims of the other and to moderate some claims of its own. It will require much more than technical ingenuity in constitution-writing to generate such mutual forbearance. Moreover, constitutional provisions that promote this goal will inevitably do so at a price - namely, the reduction of any single group's ability to work its will through the political process. And that price is likely to be most painful to pay when it entails restraining a group's ability to achieve goals that are just - for example, when it limits the ability of the victims of South African apartheid to redress the profound injustice they have suffered. This Article examines the efforts of the drafters of the new transitional South African Constitution to overcome ethnic division, or alternatively to accommodate it.
    [Show full text]
  • VI. Justice Richard J. Goldstone
    Introduction of Justice Richard J. Goldstone The 2004 Coffin Lecture The Future of International Criminal Justice Museum of Art, Portland, Maine October 14, 2004 Our Lecturer this year is living proof of the fact that our theme of law and public service can extend to the international scene. I cannot think of a better exemplar of that groundbreaking range of service than Justice Goldstone. You already know from what you have read and have heard from Dean Khoury the variety of key judicial, prosecutorial, and leadership positions he has held. What I want to add is some insight into the kind of person we have with us tonight, and his legacy. It started at the University of Witwatersrand in South Africa. As he writes in his splendid book, "For Humanity," as a student he quickly sensed the gulf between the white suburbs and the "squalor of black townships" where students wishing to study at night had to settle for paraffin lamps or candles. He became an activist and before long found himself elected to the executive committee of the National Union of South African Students. Studies and fighting apartheid did not completely preempt his time. A foreshadowing of his flair for being in the right place at the right time was revealed by a pack of unruly rats which, in a nearby psychology lab at the University, refused to cooperate with another student performing an experiment. They insisted on running the wrong way. Frustrated beyond words, this researcher rushed outdoors and there, on the steps of the university, met, for the first time, our speaker.
    [Show full text]
  • Frank I Michelman's Imagination and South Africa's Constitutional
    PREFACE INTELLECTUALS AND DEMOCRACY: FRANK I MIchelman’s ImaGINATION AND SOUTH AFRICA’s CONSTITUTIONAL JURISPRUDENCE “Intellectual activity is a little bit like seduction. If you go straight for your goal, you almost certainly won’t succeed. If you want to be someone who contributes to world historical debates, you almost certainly won’t succeed if you start off by contributing to world historical debates. The most important thing to do is to be talking about the things that have, as we might put it, world historical resonance but at the level at which you can be influential. If your contribution to the conversation then gets picked up and becomes part of a larger conversation or part of conversations happening elsewhere as well, then so be it and so much the better.” Tony Judt “On Intellectuals and Democracy” Every good idea begins somewhere. (Sometimes it begins in many places at the same time – such confluence being the hallmark of cogent currents of contemporary thought.) The symposium that gave rise to this festschrift for Frank Michelman took its cue from a symposium held at Harvard Law School earlier in 2012 to acknowledge his astonishing career. Professor Drucilla Cornell recognised early on that many South African legal scholars and jurists who might have wanted to attend the symposium would be unable to do so. She suggested that we might hold a similar symposium here in South Africa and threw her considerable weight behind the endeavour. Of course, no symposium would have been possible had Professor Michelman himself not been willing to undertake the journey to this home away from home.
    [Show full text]
  • The Apartheid Smear Israel Is Not an Apartheid State the Allegation Damages the Peace Process
    The ApArTheid SmeAr Israel is not an apartheid state The allegation damages the peace process Professor Alan Johnson BRITAIN ISRAEL COMMUNICATIONS & RESEARCH CENTRE 2 The Apartheid Smear As a movement we recognise the legitimacy of Palestinian nationalism just as we recognise the legitimacy of Zionism as a Jewish nationalism. We insist on the right of the state of Israel to exist within secure borders, but with equal vigour support the Palestinian right to national self-determination. We are gratified to see that new possibilities of resolving the issue through negotiation have arisen since the election of a new government in Israel. We would wish to encourage that process, and if we have the opportunity, to assist.1 Nelson mandela, 1993 The whole world must see that Israel must exist and has the right to exist, and is one of the great outposts of democracy in the world … Peace for Israel means security and that security must be a reality.2 martin Luther King Jr, 1967 The charge that Israel is an apartheid state is a false and malicious one that precludes, rather than promotes, peace and harmony.3 Judge richard J. Goldstone (former Justice of the South African Constitutional Court, who led the United Nations 2008-9 fact-finding mission on the Gaza conflict), 2011 If Israel were an apartheid state, I, for example, would not be allowed to work for a Jewish newspaper or live in a Jewish neighbourhood or own a home. The real apartheid is in Lebanon, where there is a law that bans Palestinians from working in over 50 professions.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 Making the Road.Fm
    A MENSCH ON THE BENCH: THE PLACE OF THE SACRED IN THE SECULAR JURISPRUDENCE OF JUSTICE RICHARD GOLDSTONE HAPTER C 3 Michael Cosser Source: http://www.constitutionalcourt.org.za/site/judges/justicerichardgoldstone/index1.html 1 Introduction Justice Richard Goldstone was one of four Supreme Court of Appeal judges (along with Lourens Ackermann, Tholie Madala and Ismail Mohamed) appointed to the first Bench of the Constitutional Court. The appointment was made by President Mandela, in consultation with the cabinet and the then Chief Justice, Judge Michael Corbett, after the appointment of Arthur Chaskalson, senior counsel and the national director of the Legal Resources Centre, as President of the Constitutional Court had been made.148 Justice Goldstone served as a judge of the Court from his appointment in 1994 to his retirement in 2003 – a period of ten years. 148 Constitutional Court of South Africa ‘ABOUT THE COURT | History of the court’ http://www.constitutionalcourt.org.za/site/thecourt/history.htm#judges (accessed 13 February 2017). 44 Justice Richard Goldstone 45 Goldstone’s service on the Bench of the Constitutional Court forms part of a long and illustrious career as a corporate lawyer, as a Supreme and Appellate Court judge, and as the head of various inquiries, both South African and international, into issues of local and international importance. The focus of this chapter, while it charts key moments in his career, is on his contribution to our understanding of the South African Constitution – an understanding forged both through what others have said about him and what he has said about himself in relation to the law and specifically about the Constitution, through the judgements he has handed down from the Benches of all the courts on which he has served, and through his extra-curial pronouncements, whether in interviews, speeches, reports, articles, or books.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the United Nations Fact-Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict∗
    UNITED NATIONS A General Assembly Distr. GENERAL A/HRC/12/48 25 September 2009 Original: ENGLISH HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL Twelfth session Agenda item 7 HUMAN RIGHTS IN PALESTINE AND OTHER OCCUPIED ARAB TERRITORIES Report of the United Nations Fact-Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict∗ ∗ Late submission. GE.09-15866 A/HRC/12/48 page 2 CONTENTS Paragraphs Page Acronyms and abbreviations .......................................................................................... 11 Executive summary .............................................................................. 1-130 13 PART ONE: METHODOLOGY, CONTEXT AND APPLICABLE LAW INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 131-150 37 I. METHODOLOGY ............................................................... 151-175 41 A. Mandate and terms of reference ................................. 151-155 41 B. Methods of work ......................................................... 156-167 42 C. Assessment of information ......................................... 168-172 44 D. Consultation with the parties ...................................... 173-175 45 II. CONTEXT............................................................................. 176-222 46 A. Historical context......................................................... 177-197 46 B. Overview of Israel’s pattern of policies and conduct relevant to the Occupied Palestinian Territory, and links between the situation in Gaza and in the West Bank...................................... 198-209
    [Show full text]
  • A Critique of the Conception of the South African Bill of Rights" PER / PELJ 2020(23) - DOI 3781/2020/V23i0a8794
    Neither AdoptedF DUBE nor Borrowed: A PERCritique / PELJ 20 20of ( 2the3) 1 Conception of the South African Bill of Rights F Dube* Online ISSN 1727-3781 Abstract Pioneer in peer -reviewed, open access online law publications The failure of the post-apartheid government to deliver on some of the promises of the South African Bill of Rights, coupled with Author the appropriation of the Bill of Rights by the international human rights movement, create the impression that the Bill of Rights is Felix Dube a neo-liberal instrument which is irrelevant to the needs of South Africans and the realities of their circumstances. If the people of Affiliation South Africa are convinced that the Bill of Rights embraces a Western agenda more than it expresses their collective North-West University South Africa aspirations, it will lose its legitimacy. While acknowledging that the conception of the Bill of Rights is contested between the Email [email protected] international human rights movement and some South Africans, this article shows that the Bill of Rights was neither adopted nor Date Submission borrowed from the international human rights movement. South Africans did not assimilate the International Bill of Rights but 30 January 2020 conceived their own Bill of Rights in the early decades of the 20th Century. The conception of the South African Bill of Rights was Date Revised a response to colonialism and apartheid and was not a consequence of tutelage by the international human rights 13 July 2020 movement. Date Accepted 13 July 2020 Keywords Date published International human rights movement; International Bill of Rights; human rights discourse; Bill of Rights; South Africa.
    [Show full text]