Management of Teak Plantations for Solid Wood Products*

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Management of Teak Plantations for Solid Wood Products* ISTF NEWS 5400 Grosvenor Lane Bethesda, Maryland 20814, USA Special Report, December, 2009 MANAGEMENT OF TEAK PLANTATIONS FOR SOLID WOOD PRODUCTS*/ William Ladrach, President Zobel Forestry Associates, Inc. www.zfaforestry.com Abstract Teak is the premier fine furniture wood being several distinct heartwood grain patterns. Old grown in plantations around the world. growth natural teak has been used primarily Although teak was once managed on rotations for yachts, decking, interior paneling and fine of 80 to 100 years, current rotation lengths furniture. Plantation teak wood still has not have been shortened to 20 or 25 years for been well accepted in such traditional markets commercial wood production. There are some and log prices for plantation teak are much unique characteristics to consider in teak lower than those for old growth natural teak. management: It grows well in alkaline soils, it A major challenge for teak growers is to can withstand extreme drought, it forms a develop innovative markets for plantation corky pith, adventitious buds form sprouts teak and find uses for low value wood from after branch pruning, and trees can develop thinnings. The International Society of Tropical Foresters is a nonprofit organization formed in the 1950s in response to a world wide concern for the fate of tropical and subtropical forests, ISTF is dedicated to providing a communications network for tropical forestry disciplines. ISTF WebSite: www.istf-bethesda.org Board of Directors Suree Bhumibhamon, President and Regional Gary S. Hartshorn, Director at Large Director for Asia Cornell O. Dudley, Vice President and Regional Chun K. Lai, Director at Large Director for Africa Amaury P. De Sousa, Regional Director for Latin José Joaquin Campos, Director General America Roger R. B. Leakey, Director at Large Staff Frank H. Wadsworth, Editor; Jenny Adams, Staff Editor; Patricia Heaton Holmgren, Office Manager; Alicia Bazán Jimenez, Spanish Translator; Jacob L. Whitmore, Associate Director */ Reprinted with permission of the Society of American Foresters: Proceedings, SAF National Convention, International Trade and Markets Track, 30 September – 4 October 2009, Orlando, Florida, USA. Copyright 2009 by the Society of American Foresters. 1 Introduction in use to this day, however with shortened rotation lengths. Teak (Tectona grandis) is the primer high value furniture wood being grown in Teak has a long history of planting within its plantations around the world. Teak is natural range as well as around the world. relatively easy to establish in plantations and, Burma (now Myanmar) began planting teak because of the enduring global demand for using the taungya system in 1856 and, by teak wood products, it has good economic 1941, had a total of 47,000 hectares planted. prospects as a plantation species for fine Large scale planting was again initiated in the woods. 1980’s and there were 307,000 ha of teak planted by 2002 (Swe Swe Aye, 2003). The Teak is indigenous to India, Myanmar, rotation length to final harvest is 40 years. Thailand and Laos. Its range is tropical, occurring between latitudes 25°N and 9°N Teak was thought to have first been planted in (White, 1991). The natural distribution is the Indonesian archipelago on the islands of discontinuous and the eastern or Burmese Madura and Sulawesi about 300 to 400 years populations are considered to be distinct from ago and is now considered to be a naturalized the western or Indian populations. Although species in Indonesia (Keiding, 1977). On the teak is the name used for international trade, Island of Java there have been more than one there are many local names used as well: million hectares planted with teak since the sagun, tegu, tegina, thekku (India); lyiu, kyun middle of the Nineteenth Century (White, (Burma); mai sak (Thailand); jati (Indonesia); 1991). fati (Malaysia); teca (Latin America); and teck (France) (Chudnoff, 1984; Keiding, Teak was first planted in Nigeria in 1902, in 1985). Togoland (now Ghana) in 1905 and in the Ivory Coast (Côte d'Ivoire) in 1929 (Horne, In 1856, realizing the commercial and 1966; Kadambi, 1972). Initial plantings in strategic importance of the forests on the West Africa were made using seed obtained Indian subcontinent, the British brought from India, but it was soon learned that several German botanists and foresters to Burmese seed sources were superior in form India for the purpose of developing and growth in the environments of West sustainable forest management plans. Notable Africa. among those individuals was Dr. Deitrich Brandis who developed a silvicultural Teak was first introduced into the Americas at management plan for the natural forests of Trinidad in 1913 using Burmese seed sources India, called the “Brandis Selection System”, (Streets, 1962). Teak was first planted in which involves timber removal every 30 years Central America in 1926 at the Summit and a final harvest between ages 120 and 150 Botanical Garden in the former Channel Zone years (Kahrl et al., 2004). The final harvest of the Panama Canal (De Camino et al., age has now been reduced to 30 to 60 years 2002). The following year other plantings with coppicing and replanting used to were initiated in other Central American regenerate the teak forests (Pandy and Brown, countries including Honduras, Panama and 2001). In 1881, Brandis organized the official Costa Rica. Since then it has been planted in teak management plan in Burma (Fernow, nearly all tropical American countries. 1911). At about the same time, he also visited Indonesia and instituted a management plan By 2000, the total area in teak plantations for the teak plantations in Java which is still worldwide was 5.7 million hectares, or 3% of 2 all forest tree plantations (FAO, 2001). By pochote plantations. Similar criticisms have far, the largest extension of teak plantations is often been made of tropical pine plantations in Asia (Table 1). in Colombia, where trees were planted on overgrazed and highly eroded sites Table 1. Area in teak plantations by specifically as a means to control the erosion geographic region in 2000 caused by overgrazing. Region Teak ha Large scale tropical tree plantations invariably Asia 5,409,131 become targets of environmental groups. This Africa 206,550 has occurred with pines, eucalypts, Gmelina Central America 76,000 arborea, and Acacia mangium as well as teak. South America 17,500 A common criticism is that the natural forest Oceania 7,022 is cleared and destroyed to be replaced with World total 5,716,203 industrial tree plantations. The reality is that the great majority of tree plantations in the tropics have been made on deforested sites Environmental issues such as marginal agricultural sites or lands degraded by overgrazing. However, there When planted as an introduced species have been exceptions where governments outside of its natural range, teak has have created incentives to clear away the sometimes been maligned and criticized by forest for agricultural use, as was the case in those who claim that it causes erosion, Brazil with the fiscal incentives program especially when planted on slopes (Fonseca, between 1967 and 1977. When the soils on 2004; Ugalde and Gomez, 2006). In Costa the cleared sites are too poor to sustain food Rica, there have been severe criticisms of teak crops or grazing, such sites are abandoned by some environmentalists, particularly where and some of them are eventually reforested. it was widely planted on overgrazed sites in In Indonesia, incentives initiated in 1988 Guanacaste Province on the Pacific side of the promoted the conversion of marginal forests country. Photos of young trees planted on to tree plantations. The conversion was done such sites show exposed roots as proof of soil primarily on the islands of Borneo and loss under teak trees. However, similar root Sumatra and the program lasted for ten years. exposure was observed in plantations of A large portion of the Indonesian lands pochote (Bombacopsis quinata) in Costa cleared with incentives was planted to non- Rica, of the same age and growing in adjacent timber species, including oil palm and rubber plantations to teak. Criticisms have not been trees, while other lands were planted for leveled at pochote, perhaps because it is an pulpwood production, mainly with Acacia indigenous tree species in Costa Rica whereas mangium on the island of Sumatra. teak is an introduced species. The probable cause of the exposed roots of young trees is Since the early 1800’s, teak plantations on the improper management rather than any Indonesian island of Java have been inherent ability unique to teak that causes established on the multitude of small hills that erosion in plantations (Ugalde and Gomez, exist within the area of lowlands dedicated to 2006). Eroded pastures that are adjacent to the cultivation of paddy rice, corn and other some of those same teak plantations show food crops. Traditional teak management has clearly that the erosion is due to overgrazing continued to follow the recommendations that existed prior to establishing teak or made by German foresters in the Nineteenth 3 Century with plantation establishment using The key to the success of a tree species to the taungya system, where farmers tend the recover depleted soils and produce commercial young teak trees and grow food crops in wood is its ability to form leaf litter on the soil between the tree rows during the first few surface quickly to protect it against surface years. In this system, teak seeds are sown in erosion (Kanowski & Savill, 1992). In rows 5 or 6 m apart, which allows for crop Darjeeling, India, comparisons were made of cultivation between the rows of young trees. soil properties under plantations of teak, The trees are initially thinned around 3 to 5 plantations of rubber trees (Hevea brasilensis), years of age to improve the stocking of the and under natural forests.
Recommended publications
  • TFEC 1-2019 Standard for Design of Timber Frame Structures And
    TFEC 1-2019 Standard for Design of Timber Frame Structures and Commentary TFEC 1-2019 Standard Page 1 January 2019 TFEC 1-2019 Standard for Design of Timber Frame Structures and Commentary Timber Frame Engineering Council Technical Activities Committee (TFEC-TAC) Contributing Authors: Jim DeStefano Jeff Hershberger Tanya Luthi Jaret Lynch Tom Nehil Dick Schmidt, Chair Rick Way Copyright © 2019, All rights reserved. Timber Framers Guild 1106 Harris Avenue, Suite 303 Bellingham, WA 98225 TFEC 1-2019 Standard Page 2 January 2019 Table of Contents 1.0 General Requirements for Structural Design and Construction .......................................6 1.1 Applicability and Scope ........................................................................................ 6 1.2 Liability ................................................................................................................. 6 1.3 General Requirements ........................................................................................... 7 1.3.1 Strength ........................................................................................................... 7 1.3.2 Serviceability ................................................................................................... 7 1.3.3 General Structural Integrity ............................................................................. 7 1.3.4 Conformance with Standards .......................................................................... 7 1.4 Design Loads ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • View and Print This Publication
    98 lPAClIJFlI([; §OllJTHWlEST ]fORlE§T & RANGlE lEXlPlERTIMlENT §TAl'TION 1.----- Be r k e ley , C a I i for n i a____ _ ____ 1966_ _ Pacific Madrone ..... a general bibliography for a promising species PHIL1P M.McDONALD and WILLIAM E.SUNDAHL ABSTRACT: Lis t s 60 references, 21 The supply of merchantable of which emphasize the desirable wood working characteristics of the species. hardwoods in California is esti­ mated at about 1.6 billion board feet (Int. 1/4 -inch log rule), ac­ cording to the 1963 Forest Survey. A significant portion of this total is Pacific madrone (Arbutus menziesii PurshJ, whose range extends along the Pacific Coast from southern British Columbia to southern california (fig.l). So far, the demand for this raw material has been rather small largely because no profitable market has existed. Recently, several operators - -both large and small- -have begun to manufacture hardwood products in 0 reg 0 nan d California. Their activities have created interest in the available knowledge on the species, particularly on its wood working charactenstics. This note b r in g s together most of the available references on Pacific madrone. Index Subject Reference Dendrology .4, 7, 14, 25, 32, 33, 53 Ecology... .44, 54 Biotic factor s. · 6, 29 Climatic factors · . 3 Exceptional size and longevity. 1, 2, 12 Forest types · . 50 Injuries Disease. 5,38,52,55 Insects . 28 Management 45 Mensuration Site quality 42 Surveys .. 34,40, 58, 59 Volume tables . .... 24 Forest Serv i ce -U . S . Department of Agriculture 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ .
    [Show full text]
  • The Wood Lumber Company
    Te Wood Lumber Company by Deborah Grifn Scanlon Tis story starts with Edmund Wood, who owned One hundred and three years later, Falmouth has the Greene and Wood Lumber Yard, a chain of about 32,000 year-round residents, too many lumber warehouses based in New Bedford that dwellings to count, LED streetlights and a 60-per- dated back to 1835. In 1912 Mr. Wood saw son police department. Te Miskells - Joseph’s potential for growth in Falmouth and decided to grandson, Dana Miskell, and his wife Eileen - still open a branch here. He bought James Cameron’s own, manage, and welcome new and old customers small lumber yard on Locust Street and named it to Te Wood Lumber Company. Te Wood Lumber Company. Te lumber business that Edmund Wood bought on Locust Street from Mr. Cameron was originally on King Street. Owned since at least 1875 by B. B. King, for whom the street was named, the business was purchased in 1895 by Mr. Cameron. A native of Scotland, Mr. Cameron came to Fal- mouth by way of Naushon Island, where he was superintendent of the Forbes’s farm. He operated the lumber business on King Street until 1909, when he moved it to Locust Street. Te frst build- ing he put up was a large cypress shed which was in Te frst Wood Lumber Co. ad in Te Enterprise, March use for many years. In 1912, Mr. Cameron sold his 12, 1912 business to Mr. Wood and then lived in Falmouth Joseph B. Miskell, the 22-year-old son of James in retirement for another 25 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Protection Unifies, Silviculture Divides
    Article Forest Protection Unifies, Silviculture Divides: A Sociological Analysis of Local Stakeholders’ Voices after Coppicing in the Marganai Forest (Sardinia, Italy) Giampiero Branca 1,2, Irene Piredda 2, Roberto Scotti 2 , Laura Chessa 3,4, Ilenia Murgia 2,5 , Antonio Ganga 2 , Sergio Francesco Campus 2, Raffaella Lovreglio 2 , Enrico Guastini 2, Massimiliano Schwarz 6 and Filippo Giadrossich 2,4,* 1 Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Sassari, Piazza Conte di Moriana, 07100 Sassari, Italy; [email protected] 2 Nuoro Forestry School, Department of Agriculture, University of Sassari, 08100 Nuoro, Italy; [email protected] (I.P.); [email protected] (R.S.); [email protected] (I.M.); [email protected] (A.G.); [email protected] (S.F.C.); [email protected] (R.L.); [email protected] (E.G.) 3 AREA Science Park, Padriciano 99, 34149 Trieste, Italy; [email protected] 4 Desertification Research Center, University of Sassari, Viale Italia 39, 07100 Sassari, Italy 5 Department of Architecture, Design and Planning, University of Sassari, Piazza Duomo 6, 07041 Alghero, Italy 6 School of Agricultural Forest and Food Sciences, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Länggasse 85, 3052 Zollikofen, Switzerland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 28 May 2020; Accepted: 22 June 2020; Published: 25 June 2020 Abstract: Today, a forest is also understood as a real social actor with multiple-scale influences, capable of significantly conditioning the social, economic, and cultural system of a whole territory. The aim of this paper is to reconstruct and interpret the population’s perception of the silvicultural activities related to traditional use of forest resources of the southwestern Sardinian Marganai State Forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Wood Preservation: Improvement of Mechanical Properties by Vacuum Pressure Process
    International Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences (IJEAS) ISSN: 2394-3661, Volume-2, Issue-4, April 2015 Wood Preservation: Improvement of Mechanical Properties by Vacuum Pressure Process Md. Fazle Rabbi, Md. Mahmudul Islam, A.N.M. Mizanur Rahman timber. The amount of damage by the second is negligible in comparison to the first enemies. By applying proper Abstract— Wood, being a biological product, is liable to preservation technique, it is possible to protect the timber deterioration unless it is properly protected. The main reasons of deterioration of timber in service are decay due to fungal from these enemies. Preservation is the only appropriate way infection, attack by insects (borers and white ants), marine to make the timber toxic and protect it [1]. organisms and fire. Protection of wood is carried out from these agents by using preservative which can properly be used by proper design of preservation plant. Proper design of such plant The primary importance of the preservation treatment of is very essential to increase the lifespan of wood economically. wood is to increase the life of the material in service, thus Among the various wood preservation techniques, pressure decreasing the ultimate cost of the product and avoiding the processes are the most permanent technique around the world need for frequent replacements [2]. The extension of the today. In the Full cell process, wood is allowed to absorb as much liquid chemicals as possible during the pressure period, service life of timber by the application of appropriate thus leaving the maximum concentration of preservatives in the preservatives has another significant effect in the field of treated area.
    [Show full text]
  • Wood Properties of Teak (Tectona Grandis) from a Mature Unmanaged Stand in East Timor
    J Wood Sci (2011) 57:171–178 © The Japan Wood Research Society 2011 DOI 10.1007/s10086-010-1164-8 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Isabel Miranda · Vicelina Sousa · Helena Pereira Wood properties of teak (Tectona grandis) from a mature unmanaged stand in East Timor Received: May 5, 2010 / Accepted: November 5, 2010 / Published online: March 17, 2011 Abstract The wood quality from 50- to 70-year-old Tectona carpentry. Teak wood is moderately hard and heavy, seasons grandis trees from an unmanaged forest in East Timor was rapidly, kiln dries well, and has overall good machining prop- assessed. The aim was to evaluate teak in mature stands that erties. It is prized mostly for its natural durability and high had undergone uncontrolled disturbances, e.g., fi re and local dimensional stability in association with pleasant aesthetics. community usage. Heartwood represented 91% of the tree Some end-user requirements include high heartwood content radius at a height of 1.7 m, and sapwood contained on average (at least 85%) and wood density (> 675 kg/m3) and suffi cient nine rings. The mean ring width showed within-tree and strength [modulus of rupture (MOR) > 135 N/mm2].1 between-tree variability. The chemical compositions of heart- Teak grows naturally in Southeast Asia and was intro- wood and sapwood were similar. Within-tree chemical varia- duced into other tropical and subtropical regions in Austra- tion occurred only in terms of extractives, which increased lia, Africa, and Latin America. Teak is now one of the most from the pith (8.3%) to the heartwood–sapwood transition important species for tropical plantation forestry, mostly (12.7%) and decreased in the sapwood (9.2%).
    [Show full text]
  • Tall Wood Buildings in the 2021 IBC up to 18 Stories of Mass Timber
    Tall Wood Buildings in the 2021 IBC Up to 18 Stories of Mass Timber Scott Breneman, PhD, SE, WoodWorks – Wood Products Council • Matt Timmers, SE, John A. Martin & Associates • Dennis Richardson, PE, CBO, CASp, American Wood Council In January 2019, the International Code Council (ICC) approved a set of proposals to allow tall wood buildings as part of the 2021 International Building Code (IBC). Based on these proposals, the 2021 IBC will include three new construction types—Type IV-A, IV-B and IV-C—allowing the use of mass timber or noncombustible materials. These new types are based on the previous Heavy Timber construction type (renamed Type IV-HT) but with additional fire-resistance ratings and levels of required noncombustible protection. The code will include provisions for up to 18 stories of Type IV-A construction for Business and Residential Occupancies. Based on information first published in the Structural Engineers Association of California (SEAOC) 2018 Conference Proceedings, this paper summarizes the background to these proposals, technical research that supported their adoption, and resulting changes to the IBC and product-specific standards. Background: ICC Tall Wood Building Ad Hoc Committee Over the past 10 years, there has been a growing interest in tall buildings constructed from mass timber materials (Breneman 2013, Timmers 2015). Around the world there are now dozens of timber buildings constructed above eight stories tall. Some international examples include: Building Completion Location Stories Name Date Stadhaus
    [Show full text]
  • Restoration of the American Chestnut in New Jersey
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Restoration of the American Chestnut in New Jersey The American chestnut (Castanea dentata) is a tree native to New Jersey that once grew from Maine to Mississippi and as far west as Indiana and Tennessee. This tree with wide-spreading branches and a deep broad-rounded crown can live 500-800 years and reach a height of 100 feet and a diameter of more than 10 feet. Once estimated at 4 billion trees, the American chestnut Harvested chestnuts, early 1900's. has almost been extirpated in the last 100 years. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, New Jersey Field Value Office (Service) and its partners, including American Chestnut The American chestnut is valued Cooperators’ Foundation, American for its fruit and lumber. Chestnuts Chestnut Foundation, Monmouth are referred to as the “bread County Parks, Bayside State tree” because their nuts are Prison, Natural Lands Trust, and so high in starch that they can several volunteers, are working to American chestnut leaf (4"-8"). be milled into flour. Chestnuts recover the American chestnut in can be roasted, boiled, dried, or New Jersey. History candied. The nuts that fell to the ground were an important cash Chestnuts have a long history of crop for families in the northeast cultivation and use. The European U.S. and southern Appalachians chestnut (Castanea sativa) formed up until the twentieth century. the basis of a vital economy in Chestnuts were taken into towns the Mediterranean Basin during by wagonload and then shipped Roman times. More recently, by train to major markets in New areas in Southern Europe (such as York, Boston, and Philadelphia.
    [Show full text]
  • Coppicing: Using a Forester's Tool on Range- Lands Linda Howell Hardesty
    Rangelands 9(3), June 1987 129 Coppicing: Using A Forester's Tool on Range- lands Linda Howell Hardesty The phenomenon of coppicing, widelyused by foresters, ments. The coppicing stump uses the root system and can also bean important range managementtool. Coppice is reserves of the original plant, and under the influence of a defined as "all regeneration that is derived from vegetative chemical "contingency plan" reinitiates growth with proper- sprouting of dormant or adventitious buds." Range manag- ties very different from seedling growth. These properties ers talk about sprouting in conjunction with brush control, can affect forage production and quality. generally in a negative sense, as in: "mesquite's sprouting ability makes control almost impossible." While most people know what sprouting is, coppicingis only vaguely familiaras a managementtool. Foresters use coppice methods to insure a rapid, economical return to full stocking after wood is harvested, to maintain a desirable species and genetic composition, and to shorten rotation times. Following this more positive vein, what advantages might coppicinghave for the range manager interested in improving forage production? Coppiceregeneration and uncut caatinga woodlandsin northeast Brazil. The most familiar phenomenon is the speed with which coppice shoots emerge and grow. Most range managers have seen coppice shoots emerge from charred shrubs withindays ofa range fire, or have cut a tree in theyard only to have it begin almost immediately to fight back. The for- estry literature notes that coppice shoots may out-grow seed- lings for as long as 40 years (Daniel et al. 1979). Coppicing Cutting backcoppice growth of Auxemmaoncocalyx. stumps can provide browse in a hurry.
    [Show full text]
  • Creating a Timber Frame House
    Creating a Timber Frame House A Step by Step Guide by Brice Cochran Copyright © 2014 Timber Frame HQ All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the author. ISBN # 978-0-692-20875-5 DISCLAIMER: This book details the author’s personal experiences with and opinions about timber framing and home building. The author is not licensed as an engineer or architect. Although the author and publisher have made every effort to ensure that the information in this book was correct at press time, the author and publisher do not assume and hereby disclaim any liability to any party for any loss, damage, or disruption caused by errors or omissions, whether such errors or omissions result from negligence, accident, or any other cause. Except as specifically stated in this book, neither the author or publisher, nor any authors, contributors, or other representatives will be liable for damages arising out of or in connection with the use of this book. This is a comprehensive limitation of liability that applies to all damages of any kind, including (without limitation) compensatory; direct, indirect or consequential damages; income or profit; loss of or damage to property and claims of third parties. You understand that this book is not intended as a substitute for consultation with a licensed engineering professional. Before you begin any project in any way, you will need to consult a professional to ensure that you are doing what’s best for your situation.
    [Show full text]
  • Wood Preservation Manual Wood Preservation Manual
    Wood preservation manual Wood preservation manual Mechanical Wood Products Branch Forest I ndustries Division FAD Forestry Department The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. M-34 ISBN 92-5-102470-7 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. Applications for such permission, with a statement of the purpose and extent of the reproduction, should be addressed to the Director, Publications Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Via delle Terme di Caracalla, 00100 Rome, Italy. © FAD 1986 - i - CONTENTS Page CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 Background and the purpose of the manual CHAPTER 2 WHAT IS PRESERVATION? 2 Importance, benefits and economics of wood preservation, protective measures, protection by specification, protection by design detailing CHAPTER 3 NATURE OF WOOD 13 Wood structure, classes of wood, moisture content and natural durability CHAPTER 4 DECAY HAZARDS 21 Fungi, insects, borers, weathering, fire CHAPTER 5 WOOD PRESERVATIVES 32 Properties, ideal preservative, types of preservatives, tar oils,
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Significance of American Chestnut to Appalachian Culture and Ecology
    Davis, D.E. 2005. Historical significance of American chestnut to Appalachian culture and ecology. In, proc. of conf. on restoration of American chestnut to forest lands, Steiner, K.C. and J.E. Carlson (eds.). HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF AMERICAN CHESTNUT TO APPALACHIAN CULTURE AND ECOLOGY Donald E. Davis Social Sciences Division, Dalton State College, Dalton, GA 30720 USA ([email protected]) Abstract: This paper explores the significance of the American chestnut on the ecology and culture of Appalachia. Until the third decade of the 20th century, the tree was the crowning glory of the Appalachian hardwood forest, in some isolated areas comprising half of the hardwood tree population. The wildlife of the region, particularly black bears, heavily depended on the tree for both sustenance and shelter. Native Americans in the mountains frequently made use of the nut, mixing chestnut meal with corn to make bread. White mountaineers gathered the nuts to sell or trade, and sometimes used parched chestnuts as a coffee substitute. The American chestnut played a major role in the economy of the Appalachian region, providing timber for dwellings and tannic acid for the leather industry. Finally, it is argued that the decline of Appalachian subsistence culture is directly linked to the loss of the American chestnut. INTRODUCTION Few single events in North American environmental history compare with the loss of the American chestnut. “The devastation of the American chestnut by the chestnut blight," wrote William MacDonald more than two decades ago, "represents one of the greatest recorded changes in natural plant population caused by an introduced organism." MacDonald, a professor of plant pathology at West Virginia University and the current acting treasurer of the American Chestnut Foundation, estimates that chestnut-dominated forests once covered 200 million acres of land from Maine to Mississippi (MacDonald 1978; Brown and Davis 1995).
    [Show full text]