DOCSLIB.ORG

9783631654606 Toc 003.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
9783631654606 Toc 003.Pdf Table of Contents General Introduction .................................................................................................15 List of Abbreviations ..................................................................................................21 Part 1 The Position of the Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church on Ecclesiology in her ecumenical Relationship with the Catholic Church ...................................23 Chapter 1: The Ecclesiology of the Church of St Thomas Christians in the pre-Portuguese period ...........................................27 1.1 The Areas of Agreement with the Catholic Church ...................................... 27 1.1.1 The Origin of the Church of St Thomas Christians ..........................28 1.1.2 The Faith and Practice of the Church of St Thomas Christians ......38 1.1.3 The Absence of Division in the Church of St Thomas Christians till the Arrival of the Portuguese Missionaries ...............41 1.1.4 The alleged Antiochian Relation of the Church of St Thomas Christians .......................................................................44 1.1.5 The hierarchical Relation and ecclesial Affinity with the Church of the East: No Obstacle to the Identity and administrative Autonomy in the Church of St Thomas Christians ...........................50 1.1.6 Mar Thoma Margam (the Way of Thomas): the ecclesial Patrimony of the Church of St Thomas Christians ...........................63 1.1.6.1 The Development of the indigenous ecclesial Identity of the St Thomas Christians .....................................65 1.1.6.2 The Development of the advanced Ecclesial Identity through the East Syrian Influence ..........................67 1.1.6.2.1 The three Levels of hierarchical Structure ..........68 1.1.6.2.1.1 The local Level: Palliyogam ..............69 1.1.6.2.1.2 The Community Level: The Archdeacon of All India ...........71 7 1.1.6.2.1.3 The hierarchical Level: The Metropolitan of All India and the Holy See of St Thomas ........76 1.2 The Areas of Disagreement with the Catholic Church ................................. 80 1.2.1 The Alexandrian ecclesial Relationship of the Church of St Thomas Christians ..........................................................80 1.2.2 The alleged Communion of the Church of St Thomas Christians with the Roman Catholic Church in the pre-Portuguese Period ...............................................................84 Conclusion ................................................................................................................. 91 Chapter 2: The Division within the Church of St Thomas Christians after the Arrival of the Portuguese Missionaries ..............................93 2.1 The Synod of Diamper (1599).......................................................................... 93 2.2 The Coonan-Cross Oath (1653) ...................................................................... 98 Conclusion ............................................................................................................... 105 Chapter 3: The Ecclesiology of the Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church ..... 107 3.1 The Nature of the Church ............................................................................... 108 3.1.1 The Origin of the Church .................................................................. 108 3.1.2 The Church in the Pauline Letters .................................................... 110 3.1.3 The Church and the Apostolic College ............................................ 111 3.1.4 The pneumatological Dimension of the Malankara Ecclesiology ..112 3.1.5 The Church: various biblical Images ............................................... 114 3.1.6 The Church is One .............................................................................. 119 3.1.7 The Church is Holy ............................................................................. 121 3.1.8 The Church is Catholic....................................................................... 122 3.1.9 The Church is Apostolic ..................................................................... 126 3.1.10 The Church and the Authority of Christ ......................................... 127 3.1.11 The Authority of the Church ............................................................. 129 3.2 The Structure of the Church........................................................................... 130 3.3 The Catholicos cum Malankara Metropolitan ............................................. 134 3.4 The Episcopate ................................................................................................. 138 3.5 The Patriarch .................................................................................................... 144 3.6 The Primacy on the Universal Level from the Perspective of the Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church ................................................. 147 Conclusion ............................................................................................................... 152 8 Chapter 4: The Position of the Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church on the Question of the Jurisdictional Papal Primacy of the Catholic Church ....................................................................... 153 4.1 The Lack of the biblical Foundation for the Jurisdictional Papal Primacy .......................................................................... 153 4.2 The Primacy of the Church of Rome because of Rome as the Imperial Capital .................................................................... 159 4.3 No Jurisdictional Primacy, but only the Primacy of Honor of the Bishop of Rome at the Time of the Ecumenical Councils ................................................................. 164 4.4 The Universal Jurisdictional Papal Primacy of the Bishop of Rome: A Medieval Western Fabrication ..................................... 173 Conclusion ............................................................................................................... 175 Part 2 The Primacy in the View of the Catholic Church ............................................... 177 Chapter 1: The Arguments of the Catholic Church in answer to the Objections of the MOSC against the Papal Primacy .................... 179 1.1 The Biblical Foundation of the Primacy of the Bishop of Rome ............... 180 1.2 The Primacy of the Church of Rome because of the Petrine Succession and the Apostolicity ................................................ 189 1.2.1 The religious and spiritual Significance of the Roman Church .... 193 1.2.1.1 The Letter of Clement ........................................................... 194 1.2.1.2 The Letter of Bishop Dionysius of Corinth ........................ 195 1.2.1.3 The Letter of Ignatius of Antioch ........................................ 196 1.2.1.4 Irenaeus of Lyon .................................................................... 196 1.2.2 The Sense of Responsibility of the Roman Church for the whole Church.......................................................................... 197 1.2.3 The Claim of the Bishop of Rome to be the Successor to Peter with Reference to Mt 16, 18 ................................................ 198 1.2.4 Rome as the Centre of Communio ................................................... 199 1.3 The Primacy of the Bishop of Rome: Not mere Primacy of Honour at the Time of the early Ecumenical Councils ............................. 202 1.3.1 Leo the Great and his Contribution to the Concept of the Jurisdictional Papal Primacy .................................................. 208 1.3.2 Symmachian Forgeries ...................................................................... 211 9 1.4 The Universal Jurisdictional Papal Primacy of the Bishop of Rome: No medieval western Fabrication, but the Result of a gradual Growth ............................................................... 212 1.4.1 Gregory the Great (590–604) ............................................................ 213 1.4.2 The Pentarchy ...................................................................................... 214 1.4.3 The Pseudo-Isidorian False Decretals (850) .................................... 217 1.4.4 The Donation of Constantine ............................................................ 219 1.4.5 Jurisdictional Papal Primacy: Solution to the Problems and the Conflicts of the Second Millennium .................................. 220 1.4.5.1 Pope Gregory VII (1073–1085) ........................................... 222 1.4.5.2 Innocent III (1198–1216) ..................................................... 225 1.4.5.3 Innocent IV (1243–1254) ..................................................... 227 1.4.5.4 The Decline of the Papacy and the Revival of Conciliarism ........................................................ 228 1.4.5.5 The Reformation and the post-Trent Period ..................... 230 1.4.5.6 Gallicanism ............................................................................ 231 1.4.5.7 The German Imperial Church Episcopalism and the judicial Powers of Nuncios ............................................ 232 1.4.5.8 The French Revolution (1789) and the Papacy ................. 233 1.4.5.9 The Ultramontanism and the Papacy ................................. 234 Conclusion ............................................................................................................... 235 Chapter 2: The Petrine Ministry in Vatican I and Vatican II ........................... 237 2.1 The Petrine Ministry in Vatican
Load more

Recommended publications
  • In Conversation with Christos Yannaras: a Critical View of the Council of Crete
    In conversation with Christos Yannaras: a Critical View of the Council of Crete Andreas Andreopoulos Much has been said and written in the last few months about the Council in Crete, both praise and criticism. We heard much about issues of authority and conciliarity that plagued the council even before it started. We heard much about the history of councils, about precedents, practices and methodologies rooted in the tradition of the Orthodox Church. We also heard much about the struggle for unity, both in terms what every council hopes to achieve, as well as in following the Gospel commandment for unity. Finally, there are several ongoing discussions about the canonical validity of the council. Most of these discussions revolve around matters of authority. I have to say that while such approaches may be useful in a certain way, inasmuch they reveal the way pastoral and theological needs were considered in a conciliar context in the past, if they become the main object of the reflection after the council, they are not helping us evaluate it properly. The main question, I believe, is not whether this council was conducted in a way that satisfies the minimum of the formal requirements that would allow us to consider it valid, but whether we can move beyond, well beyond this administrative approach, and consider the council within the wider context of the spiritual, pastoral and practical problems of the Orthodox Church today.1 Many of my observations were based on Bishop Maxim Vasiljevic’s Diary of the Council, 2 which says something not only about the official side of the council, but also about the feeling behind the scenes, even if there is a sustained effort to express this feeling in a subtle way.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Times (A.D
    The Catholic Faith History of Catholicism A Brief History of Catholicism (Excerpts from Catholicism for Dummies) Ancient Times (A.D. 33-741) Non-Christian Rome (33-312) o The early Christians (mostly Jews who maintained their Jewish traditions) o Jerusalem’s religious establishment tolerated the early Christians as a fringe element of Judaism o Christianity splits into its own religion . Growing number of Gentile converts (outnumbered Jewish converts by the end of the first century) . Greek and Roman cultural influences were adapted into Christianity . Destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem in A.D. 70 (resulted in the final and formal expulsion of the Christians from Judaism) o The Roman persecutions . The first period (A.D. 68-117) – Emperor Nero blamed Christians for the burning of Rome . The second period (A.D. 117-192) – Emperors were less tyrannical and despotic but the persecutions were still promoted . The third period (A.D. 193-313) – Persecutions were the most virulent, violent, and atrocious during this period Christian Rome (313-475) o A.D. 286 Roman Empire split between East and West . Constantinople – formerly the city of Byzantium and now present- day Istanbul . Rome – declined in power and prestige during the barbarian invasions (A.D. 378-570) while the papacy emerged as the stable center of a chaotic world o Roman Emperor Constantine issued the Edict of Milan in A.D. 313 which legalized Christianity – it was no longer a capital crime to be Christian o A.D. 380 Christianity became the official state religion – Paganism was outlawed o The Christian Patriarchs (Jerusalem, Antioch, Alexandria, Rome, and Constantinople) .
    [Show full text]
  • The Church Missionary Society and the Christians of Kerala, 1813-1840
    Half-Brothers in Christ: The Church Missionary Society and the Christians of Kerala, 1813-1840 by Joseph Gerald Howard M. A. (History), University at Buffalo, State University of New York, 2010 Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the Department of History Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences Joseph Gerald Howard 2014 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Fall 2014 Approval Name: Joseph Gerald Howard Degree: Master of Arts (History) Title: Half-Brothers in Christ: The Church Missionary Society and the Christians of Kerala, 1813-1840 Examining Committee: Chair: Aaron Windel Assistant Professor of History Paul Sedra Senior Supervisor Associate Professor of History Derryl MacLean Supervisor Associate Professor of History Mary-Ellen Kelm Supervisor Professor of History Laura Ishiguro External Examiner Assistant Professor Department of History University of British Columbia Date Defended: August 28, 2014 ii Partial Copyright Licence iii Abstract In the 1810s, the Church Missionary Society (CMS) established the College at Cottayam in south India to educate boys intended for the priesthood in the local, indigenous church. While their goal was to help the church, their activities increased British power in the community. The results of CMS involvement included increasing interference of British officials in matters internal to the Malankara Church (e.g., episcopal succession), tacit recognition of the authority of colonial courts to resolve disputes in the church, and the fragmentation of the St. Thomas Christian community. These effects reshaped the church into something more consistent with British Christianity and more subject to British rule. Keywords: British Empire; Christianity; India; mission iv Dedication In memory of M.
    [Show full text]
  • Preamble. His Excellency. Most Reverend Dom. Carlos Duarte
    Preamble. His Excellency. Most Reverend Dom. Carlos Duarte Costa was consecrated as the Roman Catholic Diocesan Bishop of Botucatu in Brazil on December !" #$%&" until certain views he expressed about the treatment of the Brazil’s poor, by both the civil (overnment and the Roman Catholic Church in Brazil caused his removal from the Diocese of Botucatu. His Excellency was subsequently named as punishment as *itular bishop of Maurensi by the late Pope Pius +, of the Roman Catholic Church in #$-.. His Excellency, Most Reverend /ord Carlos Duarte Costa had been a strong advocate in the #$-0s for the reform of the Roman Catholic Church" he challenged many of the 1ey issues such as • Divorce" • challenged mandatory celibacy for the clergy, and publicly stated his contempt re(arding. 2*his is not a theological point" but a disciplinary one 3 Even at this moment in time in an interview with 4ermany's Die 6eit magazine the current Bishop of Rome" Pope Francis is considering allowing married priests as was in the old time including lets not forget married bishops and we could quote many Bishops" Cardinals and Popes over the centurys prior to 8atican ,, who was married. • abuses of papal power, including the concept of Papal ,nfallibility, which the bishop considered a mis(uided and false dogma. His Excellency President 4et9lio Dornelles 8argas as1ed the Holy :ee of Rome for the removal of His Excellency Most Reverend Dom. Carlos Duarte Costa from the Diocese of Botucatu. *he 8atican could not do this directly. 1 | P a g e *herefore the Apostolic Nuncio to Brazil entered into an agreement with the :ecretary of the Diocese of Botucatu to obtain the resi(nation of His Excellency, Most Reverend /ord.
    [Show full text]
  • The Holy See
    The Holy See ADDRESS OF JOHN PAUL II TO THE BISHOPS OF SCANDINAVIA ON THEIR VISIT AD LIMINA APOSTOLORUM Saturday, 5 April 2003 Dear Brother Bishops, 1. "Grace, mercy, and peace from God the Father and Christ Jesus our Lord" (1 Tim 1:2). With fraternal affection I warmly welcome you, the Bishops of Scandinavia. Your first visit ad Limina Apostolorum in this new millennium is an occasion to renew your commitment to proclaim ever more courageously the Gospel of Jesus Christ in truth and love. As pilgrims to the tombs of the Apostles Peter and Paul, you "come to see Peter" (cf. Gal 1:18) and his collaborators in the service of the universal Church. You thus confirm your "unity in the same faith, hope and charity, and more and more recognize and treasure that immense heritage of spiritual and moral wealth that the whole Church, joined with the Bishop of Rome by the bond of communion, has spread throughout the world" (Pastor Bonus, Appendix I, 3). 2. As Bishops, you have been endowed with the authority of Christ (cf. Lumen Gentium, 25) and entrusted with the task of bearing witness to his saving Gospel. The faithful of Scandinavia, with great expectation, look to you to be steadfast teachers of the faith, selfless in your readiness to speak the truth "in season and out of season" (2 Tim 4:2). By your personal witness to the living mystery of God (cf. Catechesi Tradendae, 7), you make known the boundless love of him who has revealed himself and his plan for humanity through Jesus Christ.
    [Show full text]
  • Articles of Incorporation of St. Basil's Indian Orthodox Church
    ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF ST. BASIL'S INDIAN ORTHODOX CHURCH Article of Incorporation of the undersigned, desiring to form a Non-Profit Corporation under the Non-Profit Corporation Law of Texas, do hereby certify: 1. Name 1.1 The name of the parish shall be '"St. Basil's Indian Orthodox Church of Texas," hereafter called "St. Basil's" or simply as '"the Church" or the "the Parish." The parish is incorporated as a nonprofit Religious Corporation, in the State of Texas 2. Affiliation 2.1 St. Basil's Indian Orthodox Church of Texas shall be one of the parishes of the Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church, hereafter called the "parent church" whose Primate is the Catholicos of the East cum Malankara Metropolitan residing at The Catholicate Palace, Devalokam, Kottayam, 686038, Kerala State, India. 2.2 St. Basil's Indian Orthodox Church of Texas shall be under the Jurisdiction of the Diocese of South-West America , one of the dioceses of the Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church, under the Catholicos of the East cum Malankara Metropolitan. The Metropolitan of the Diocese of South-West America in which the St. Basil's Indian Orthodox Church of Texas is included shall be an approved Prelate of the Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church. Diocesan Metropolitan shall directly administer the Parish under the supervision of the Catholicos of the East cum Malankara Metropolitan. 3. The Duties and Responsibilities of the Church 3.1 Subject to the provisions of the Constitution and Bylaws of The Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church, and any amendment thereto St. Basil's
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutio 'Universi Dominici Gregis'
    1996-02-26- SS Ioannes Paulus II - Constitutio ‘Universi Dominici Gregis’ IOANNIS PAULI PP. II SUMMI PONTIFICIS CONSTITUTIO APOSTOLICA «UNIVERSI DOMINICI GREGIS» DE SEDE APOSTOLICA VACANTE DEQUE ROMANI PONTIFICIS ELECTIONE Ioannes Paulus PP. II Servus Servorum Dei ad perpetuam rei memoriam UNIVERSI DOMINICI GREGIS Pastor est Romanae Ecclesiae Episcopus, in qua Beatus Petrus Apostolus, divina disponente Providentia, Christo per martyrium extremum sanguinis testimonium reddidit. Plane igitur intellegitur legitimam apostolicam in hac Sede successionem, quacum « propter potentiorem principalitatem, necesse est omnem convenire Ecclesiam »,(1) usque peculiari diligentia esse observatam. Hanc propter causam Summi Pontifices, saeculorum decursu, suum ipsorum esse officium aeque ac praecipuum ius existimaverunt opportunis normis Successoris electionem moderari. Sic, proximis superioribus temporibus, Decessores Nostri Sanctus Pius X (2), Pius XI (3), Pius XII (4), Ioannes XXIII (5) et novissime Paulus VI (6), pro peculiaribus temporum necessitatibus, providas congruentesque curaverunt regulas de hac quaestione ferendas, ut convenienter procederent apta praeparatio atque accurata evolutio consessus electorum cui, vacante Apostolica Sede, grave omninoque difficile demandatur officium Romani Pontificis eligendi. Si quidem nunc et Ipsi hoc aggredimur negotium, id certe facimus haud parvi aestimantes normas illas quas e contrario penitus colimus quasque magna ex parte confirmandas censemus, saltem quod ad praecipua elementa et principia primaria attinet
    [Show full text]
  • The Practice of Law As Response to God's Call
    The Practice of Law as Response to God's Call Susan J. Stabile* INTRODUCTION My writing in recent years has explored the question o f what Catholic social thought and Catholic legal theory add to our considera- tion of various legal questions. That project proceeds from the premise that faith and religion are not to be relegated to church on Sunday (or temple on Saturday, or other equivalents); rather, faith and religion are relevant to our actions in the world. In the words of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith,' "There cannot be two parallel lives in [a Cath- olic's] existence: on the one hand, the so-called 'spiritual life,' with its values and demands; and on the other, the so-called 'secular' life, that is, life in a family, at work, in social responsibilities, and in the responsibili- ties of public life and in culture." 2th olAicissm is aIn 'in cahmaationval faeith ' that sees God in everything, and the oGosbpel sis ae livirng vmesesagde, in tended to be infused into the reality of the eworlld ins whiech wwe livhe." e r e3 , t" Robert andC Marion Shorta Distinguished Chair in Law, University of St. Thomas School of Law; -Fellow, Holloran Center for Ethical Leadership; Affiliate Senior Fellow. St. John's University Vin- centian Center for Church and Society; Research Fellow. New York University School of Law. Center for Labor and Employment Law; JD. 1982, New York University School of Law; B.A. 1979, Georgetown University. This Article is an expanded version of my presentation at the Seattle Uni- versity School of Law's March 7, 21)08 Symposium, Pluralism.
    [Show full text]
  • Directorio Pastoral De La Iniciación Cristiana Para La Diócesis De Orihuela-Alicante
    DIRECTORIO PASTORAL DE LA INICIACIÓN CRISTIANA PARA LA DIÓCESIS DE ORIHUELA-ALICANTE SIGLAS AG = Ad Gentes. Decreto conciliar sobre la actividad misionera de la Iglesia, de 1965. CA = Catequesis de Adultos. Documento de la Comisión Episcopal sobre Catequesis de Adultos, de 1991. CC = Catequesis de la Comunidad. Documento de la Comisión Episcopal sobre catequesis, de 1983. CCE = Catecismo de la Iglesia Católica, 1992. CIC = Código de Derecho Canónico, de 1983 CF = El catequista y su formación. Comisión Episcopal de Enseñanza y Catequesis, de 1985. CT = Catechesi Tradendae. Exhortación Apostólica de Juan Pablo II, de 1976. DGC = Directorio General para la Catequesis. Congregación para el Clero, de 1997. DPF = Directorio de Pastoral Familiar de la Iglesia en España. Conferencia Episcopal Española, de 2003. EE = Ecclesia in Europa Exhortación Apostólica de Juan Pablo II, de 2003 EN = Evangelii Nuntiandi. Exhortación apostólica de Pablo VI, de 1975. FC = Familiaris Consortio. Exhortación Apostólica de Juan Pablo II sobre la Familia de GS = Gaudium et spes. Constitución pastoral sobre la Iglesia en el mundo actual 1965. ICRO = La Iniciación cristiana. Reflexiones y Orientaciones. Conferencia Episcopal Española, de 1998. LG = Lumen Gentium. Constitución conciliar sobre la Iglesia, de 1964. NMI = Novo Millennio Ineunte Carta Apostólica de Juan Pablo II, de 2001. OPC = Orientaciones Pastorales para el Catecumenado. Conferencia Episcopal Española, de 2002. PG = Pastores Gregis. Exhortación apostólica de Juan Pablo II, de 2003 RB = Ritual del Bautismo. RC = Ritual de la Confirmación RICA = Ritual de la Iniciación Cristiana de Adultos, de 1972 RP = Ritual de la Penitencia. 1 INTRODUCCIÓN Motivación del Documento 1. En estos últimos años, un nuevo y vigoroso interés se está despertando en la Iglesia por el tema de la Iniciación cristiana.
    [Show full text]
  • Diccionario Del Cónclave
    DICCIONARIO DEL CÓNCLAVE - Explicaciones jurídicas tomadas del DGDC(*): • Cónclave. • Elección del Romano Pontífice. • Secreto en la Elección del Romano Pontífice. • Cardenal. • Colegio Cardenalicio. • Sede apostólica vacante e impedida. - Ofrecemos también el texto del motu proprio de Benedicto XVI, de 22 de febrero, que facilita el recorte de tiempo para el inicio del cónclave, endurece algunas mayorías para la elección y también introduce la excomunión latae sententiae para la ruptura del secreto. (*) J. Otaduy - A. Viana - J. Sedano (dir.), Diccionario General de Derecho Canónico, ed. Thomson-Reuters-Aranzadi, vol. I-VII, Pamplona 2012. Oficina de Información del Opus Dei en España www.opusdei.es con la colaboración de la Facultad de Derecho Canónico de la Universidad de Navarra www.unav.es CONCILIOS PARTICULARES DGDC II apostolorum, I, Paderbornae 1905; F.L. FERRARIS, Bi- institución del cónclave y de las distintas pie- bliotheca canonica iuridica moralis theologica, II, zas del sistema electoral del Romano Pontí- Romae 1886; L. CHIAPPETTA, Il Codice di Diritto Ca- fice, atendiendo a las necesidades del mo- nonico. Commento giuridico-pastorale, I, Bologna mento histórico concreto, estas bases no han 32011, 544-553; P.GASPARRI (a cura di), Codicis Iuris Canonici Fontes, III, Romae 1933, 534-545; S. C. sufrido modificaciones esenciales. La regula- BONICELLI, I concili particolari da Graziano a Trento. ción detallada, sistemática e integral del cón- Studio sulla evoluzione del diritto della Chiesa la- clave vino con la constitución apostólica de tina, Brescia 1971; J. I. ARRIETA, Instrumentos supra- san Pío X Vacante Sede Apostolica del diocesanos para el gobierno de la Iglesia particular, 25.XII.1904, que puede considerarse como la Ius canonicum 24 (1984) 607-647; J.
    [Show full text]
  • New-Zealand.Pdf
    The Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church also known as the Indian Orthodox Church Greetings to you in the name of our Lord, was founded by St. Thomas, one of the twelve apostles of our Lord and Saviour It is with immense gratitude to Lord Almighty we would like to inform you the Jesus Christ, who came to India in A.D. 52. It is an autocephalous Oriental Orthodox maiden visit of the supreme prelate of our Church His Holiness Baselios Marthoma Church based in the Indian State of Kerala. The faith of the Church is that which was Paulose to New Zealand. established by the three Ecumenical Councils of Nicea (A.D. 325), Constantinople (A.D. 381) and Ephesus (A.D. 431). His Holiness will be accompanied by our Diocesan Metropolitan His Grace Dr.Yuhanon Mar Diascoros. They will be arriving in Auckland on 10th November 2015 At least from the fourth century the Indian Church entered into a close relationship and will be with our faithful in Auckland, Hamilton & Wellington as per the following with the Persian or East Syrian Church. They inherited the Syrian language and liturgies itinerary. Since this is a brief visit the places of stopover had to be limited. As such we and gradually came to be known as Syrian Christians. At present the Church is using request our faithful from other areas to make it convenient to meet and seek the the West Syrian liturgy. blessings of our Holy Fathers at a convenient venue. The Church entered into a new phase of its history by the establishment of the We seek your support and prayerful presence on this occasion.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Caste System Prevalent Among the Syrian Christians of Kerala? a Critical Analysis
    Vol. 5 No. 3 January 2018 ISSN: 2321-788X UGC Approval No: 43960 Impact Factor: 2.114 IS CASTE SYSTEM PREVALENT AMONG THE SYRIAN CHRISTIANS OF KERALA? A CRITICAL ANALYSIS THOMAS P JOHN Assistant Professor in History St. Xavier’s College, Thumba, Kerala, India Article Particulars: Received: 25.11.2017 Accepted: 06.12.2017 Published: 20.01.2018 Abstract The concept of caste has ever been a reality in all societies and countries, and yet there exists some ambiguities in understanding the concept of caste in some communities. A great confusion exists among the academicians as well as in the general public about the concept of caste in the Syrian Christian community in Kerala. The multiplicity of denominations among them, each having their own Rite, Liturgy, Clergy, Ecclesial hierarchy etc. had created great confusion among the people especially among the non Christians. Vague ideas had taken position and a majority including learned historians and thinkers are totally mistaken in this regard. Some interpret these varieties as separate castes. Hence, an earnest attempt to find out the truth in this matter is urgent. This article is an attempt to deactivate the wrong concepts about the caste factor in the Syrian Christian community and to replace it with the most reasonable and genuine knowledge of the same. It finds out that all the different Syrian Christian groups except the ‘Knanites’ forms one single cast and the difference is only denominational. Keywords: Caste, Religion, Syrian Christians, St. Thomas Tradition, Synod of Diamper, Coonnan Cross Oath, ‘Mission of Help’ Malankara, Jacobite, Knanaya, Marthoma Syrian, Pazhayakooru, Puthenkooru, Idavaka.
    [Show full text]