Highfields Area Plan 2012 - 2015

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Highfields Area Plan 2012 - 2015 Highfields Area Plan 2012 - 2015 www.sraltd.co.uk Supported by Spinney Hills, Castle & Stoneygate Wards Highfields Community Association. & Mayfield Children’s Centre © HAF ‐ November 2012 Highfields Area Plan 2012 – 2015 Content Page Executive Summary i 1.0 Introduction 1 2.0 Demographic and Social Profile 2 3.0 Consultation 3 4.0 The Plan 4 4.1 Education 4 4.2 Local Decision Making 5 4.3 Children and Families 6 4.4 Health 7 4.5 Community Cohesion 7 4.6 Employment and Business 9 4.7 Crime and Antisocial Behaviour 10 4.8 Environment and Housing 11 4.9 Transport 11 5.0 Appendix A 12 Highfields Area Plan 2012 - 2015 Executive Summary In 2003 the Highfields Area Plan was prepared but not published. This presented both an overview of the Highfields area and a series of priorities for business and public services. However, in time this plan has been overtaken by changes in the population and the structure of local governance, in particular the independence of the Highfields Centre and the ongoing work undertaken by the Highfields Area Forum who commissioned this work. Equally, the economic climate in 2012 is considerably less prosperous than in 2003 and this is likely to have an effect on many local residents. Social Research Associates (SRA) was commissioned by Highfields Area Forum and funded by the three local wards (Spinney Hills, Castle and Stoneygate), the Mayfield Children’s Centre and the Highfields Community Association, to update the Area Plan, initially through desktop research and subsequently through stakeholder consultation. Over 60 local organisations, including the City Mayor’s team, local Councillors and Officers from the local statutory agencies and members of the Highfields Area Forum, took part in the discussions. In addition around 700 individuals were engaged via community workshops, replying to a questionnaire and participation at public events. This report presents the results of this research in terms of local priorities in key areas, as well as 46 actions to tackle these issues. Desktop Research Initially, desktop research was undertaken to update the demographic, social and economic overview of the area given in the 2003 Area Plan. Comparisons between Highfields in 2003 and 2012 are not directly possible because of the changing electoral boundaries and the lack of up-to-date statistics focusing on the area. However, many of the issues highlighted in the 2003 report remain. Highfields is still an area of high unemployment, poor health and low property ownership. On the plus side, education in the area has improved and crime levels are now lower than in 2003. Key indicators are: Highfields has a younger than average population with a relatively high turnover of residents. The majority of residents are from BME groups, particularly from an Indian sub-continent background. Children from schools in Highfields do better than the Leicester average at Key Stage 1 and 2, and have overtaken Leicester averages for Key Stage 4 in the last year. The average income is considerably below the regional average. Over 25% of the population are in receipt of benefits compared to 15% nationally. Unemployment is significantly higher than in other parts of the city. Crime has been considerably reduced in the area and it is now rated as ‘Average’ for Leicestershire. There are lower levels of drinking and smoking in Highfields than in Leicester generally, but diet is worse and obesity is at the City average. The life expectancy for both men and women is lower in Highfields than the rest of Leicester. i Stakeholder Consultation A number of different mechanisms were used to engage organisations and local people in discussing the implications of the desk top research. A voting exercise at the 2011 Highfields Festival Meetings with the Highfields Area Forum One to one interviews with Councillors and Officers from the City Mayor’s team, the police, the NHS, local Councillors and community and voluntary sector representatives A questionnaire distributed via local organisations and community meeting points Letters and emails from stakeholders such as head teachers, GPs and transport operators Workshops with local people, including targeted recruitment of young people The focus of the consultation was to identify priorities and associated programmes to address these priorities. Although these inevitably focused on problems, it was universally emphasised that there are considerable strengths in Highfields; specifically the diversity of the population and the strength of the community cohesion within this, in spite of the area continuing to receive new arrival communities. The Results The results which form the basis of the Area Plan show that there are priorities within the nine policy areas, with overall education the highest and transport the lowest. Nevertheless, it was also agreed that all issues are important in providing a joined up approach to improving Highfields as a whole. Education More local decision making Children and families Health Community Cohesion Employment and Business Crime & Antisocial Behaviour Environment and Housing Transport The results have been used to write this Area Plan which includes 46 actions - a copy is available by email from the Highfields Centre (email: [email protected]). Highfields Area Plan Workshop – March 2012 ii The Actions with target timescales Policy Implementation Date(s) Education 1) Support opportunities for travel and outdoor education 2) Enhance careers advisory services within the area and include life skills advice 3) Set up a mentor programme to support and increase the aspirations of young people especially via an accredited arts programme 4) Provide parents with support to help children with homework 5) Provide more out of school activities and study support 6) Provide more opportunities to learn English Local Decision Making 7) Encourage more people to volunteer for local projects 8) Offer incentives for volunteering including training and qualifications 9) Liaise with other voluntary groups especially nearby areas such as St Matthews 10) Use statutory duties such as Equality Impact Assessment at access resources and challenge some funding cuts 11) Work towards more partnership between the Council and Highfields including devolving more decision making and budgets to the community and local Councillors All of these actions are Children And Families intended to be achieved by 12) Use the informal networks and voluntary groups within the community to encourage self-help 2015, with a 2013 start date 13) Make it easier to get help anonymously for some actions, subject 14) Face up to and tackle the dysfunctional aspects of cultural differences to appropriate funding 15) Increase the role of the voluntary sector in providing services for families being identified/received. 16) Provide more out of school family activities Actions For The Plan: Health A regular quarterly update 17) New partnerships with local GPs and the voluntary sector about progress on the 18) Options of accessing health advice and support outside the Highfields area actions will be provided to 19) Healthy cooking at community events the Highfields Area Forum 20) Provide child care so women can attend exercise and yoga classes meetings, with the Actions for Community Cohesion Secretariat charged with 21) Ensure there is good access to Highfields from London Road and the redevelopment of Leicester coordinating the Station necessary actions. 22) Set up exchange visits between people in Highfields and other areas 23) Hold an annual arts festival promoting the vision of “Diversity and Unity” 24) Protect important buildings 25) Make better use of public and funded premises including sharing premises 26) Market Highfields as a place to visit Employment And Business 27) Liaise with banks and credit unions to fund business start-ups 28) Provide targeted support to small businesses including mentoring 29) Set up a business support service to support businesses, especially small enterprises 30) Carry out a skills audit to inform training programmes and career choices 31) Set up entry to work projects targeting unemployed young people 32) Set up incubation units with cheap rents Crime And Antisocial Behaviour 33) Community mentors and programmes to support and inspire young people at risk 34) Family focused programmes on addiction prevention 35) More co-operation between the community and police and encouragement to report crime including anonymously through Crimestoppers 36) Appoint Community Ambassadors to support neighbourhoods in challenging unsocial behaviour Environment And Housing 37) Introduce community recycling points 38) Local community schemes to ‘adopt’ and support neighbourhood parks 39) Neighbourhood clear up and rubbish reporting schemes 40) Set up a scheme for joint apprentice/private sector to buy and renovate housing 41) Stop the creation of more hostels. Transport 42) Encourage car clubs 43) Encourage shared taxi trips 44) Better co-ordination of existing social transport via a social enterprise management project 45) Continue to find an acceptable solution to parking in the wider area 46) Encourage more walking and cycling especially at ‘hot spots’ such as mosques on Fridays iii Highfields Area Plan 2012 1.0 Introduction In 2003 the Highfields Area Plan was prepared but not published and this presented both an overview of the Highfields area and a series of priorities for business and public services. However, in time this plan has been overtaken by changes in the population and the structure of local governance, in particular the independence of the Highfields Centre and the ongoing work undertaken by the Highfields Area Forum who commissioned this work. Equally, the economic climate in 2012 is considerably less prosperous than in 2003 and this is likely to have a considerable effect on many local residents. Social Research Associates (SRA) was commissioned to update the Area Plan through desktop research and stakeholder consultation. This report presents the results of this research in terms of local priorities and key actions for the Plan. 2.0 Highfields Today: Demographic and Social Profile Defining the area Highfields is not a distinct area in terms of electoral boundaries.
Recommended publications
  • The Evaluation of the Leicester Teenage Pregnancy Prevention Strategy
    The Evaluation of the Leicester Teenage Pregnancy Prevention Strategy Phase 2 Report Informed by the T.P.U. Deep Dive Findings Centre for Social Action January 2007 The Research Team Peer Evaluators Alexan Junior Castor Jordan Christian Jessica Hill Tina Lee Lianne Murray Mikyla Robins Sian Walker Khushbu Sheth Centre for Social Action Hannah Goodman Alison Skinner Jennie Fleming Elizabeth Barner Acknowledgements Thanks to: Practitioners who helped to arrange sessions with our peer researchers or parents Rebecca Knaggs Riverside Community College Michelle Corr New College Roz Folwell Crown Hills Community College Anna Parr Kingfisher Youth Club Louise McGuire Clubs for Young People Sam Merry New Parks Youth Centre Harsha Acharya Contact Project Vanice Pricketts Ajani Women and Girls Centre Naim Razak Leicester City PCT Kelly Imir New Parks STAR Tenant Support Team Laura Thompson Eyres Monsell STAR Tenant Support Team Young people who took part in the interviews Parents who took part in the interviews Practitioners who took part in the interviews, including some of the above and others Connexions PAs who helped us with recruitment Also: Teenage Pregnancy and Parenthood Partnership Board Mandy Jarvis Connexions Liz Northwood Connexions HR Kalpit Doshi The Jain Centre, Leicester Lynn Fox St Peters Health Centre Contents Page No. Acknowledgements Executive Summary 1 Methodology 7 Information from young people consulted at school and in the community 15 What Parents told us 30 What Practitioners told us 39 Perspectives from School Staff Consultation
    [Show full text]
  • Main Bus Services Around Leicester
    126 to Coalville via Loughborough 27 to Skylink to Loughborough, 2 to Loughborough 5.5A.X5 to X5 to 5 (occasional) 127 to Shepshed Loughborough East Midlands Airport Cossington Melton Mowbray Melton Mowbray and Derby 5A 5 SYSTON ROAD 27 X5 STON ROAD 5 Rothley 27 SY East 2 2 27 Goscote X5 (occasional) E 5 Main bus routes in TE N S GA LA AS OD 126 -P WO DS BY 5A HALLFIEL 2 127 N STO X5 SY WESTFIELD LANE 2 Y Rothley A W 126.127 5 154 to Loughborough E S AD Skylink S 27 O O R F N Greater Leicester some TIO journeys STA 5 154 Queniborough Beaumont Centre D Glenfield Hospital ATE RO OA BRA BRADG AD R DGATE ROAD N Stop Services SYSTON TO Routes 14A, 40 and UHL EL 5 Leicester Leys D M A AY H O 2.126.127 W IG 27 5A D H stop outside the Hospital A 14A R 154 E L A B 100 Leisure Centre E LE S X5 I O N C Skylink G TR E R E O S E A 40 to Glenfield I T T Cropston T E A R S ST Y-PAS H B G UHL Y Reservoir G N B Cropston R ER A Syston O Thurcaston U T S W R A E D O W D A F R Y U R O O E E 100 R Glenfield A T C B 25 S S B E T IC WA S H N W LE LI P O H R Y G OA F D B U 100 K Hospital AD D E Beaumont 154 O R C 74, 154 to Leicester O A H R R D L 100 B F E T OR I N RD.
    [Show full text]
  • Leicester Network Map Aug21
    Sibson Rd Red Hill Lane Greengate Lane Lambourne Rd Greengate Lane Beacon Ave Beacon ip Ave B Link Rd Cropston Rd anl ra W Way Earls dg Link Rd a Elmfield Avenue t T e h Dalby Rd Church Hill Rd R u Oakfield Avenue Wanlip Ln d r c Fielding Rd Birstall Castle Hill Newark Rd a Johnson Rd l L 25 26 s Country Park il o t Edward St t dg s e o Andrew Rd Colby Dr Long Close A R n Melton Rd Albio d Rd Pinfold d n R on R Stadon Rd S i Link Rd t n d School Lane Road Ridgeway n en Beaumont Leys Lane Rd Birstall Hollow Rd o Thurmaston 21 Drive t B s Knights Road Went Rd op d r Beaumont R C Lodge Road Hoods Close h Hum g be L Madeline Rd Manor Rd rst Blount B r d Co-op u on adgate R e o e A46 Road i r L c Alderton r e ion Rd o a s n n D 74 en Leycroft Rd b Holt Rd Southdown Rd t Ave Curzon d Walkers e Anstey B h e Close Melton Rd Jacklin Drive r R y Mowmacre g b R k Beda l l u o e Ashfield d D o o r o ive T r C Drive Hill L h b u r Ave June Avenue e r h c d h et R Groby Rd t p Bord a ll Trevino Dr Roman Rd a r e Rushey Mead 4 e H o r s Great Central a M t st Verdale Beaumont D o ir r n Railway Hill Rise iv B Sainsbury’s Road Park Holderness Rd e R 14A d Oakland Gynsill Close Trevino Dr R Nicklaus Rd Cashm ed H Avenue Braemar Dr r or ill Way BarkbythorpeMountain Rd Gorse Hill Gorse D e 25 26 ck V Watermead Way wi iew Road Krefeld Wayer Thurcaston Rd Humberstone Lane Beaumont t Uxbridge Rd t Lockerbie W ug ypass u o Troon Way o h ern B odstock Rd Avenue r W t B C es 54 74 Leys Babington Marwood Rd Retro a o a y r W n d b te Tilling no s Computer R n
    [Show full text]
  • List of Polling Stations for Leicester City
    List of Polling Stations for Leicester City Turnout Turnout City & Proposed 2 Polling Parliamentary Mayoral Election Ward & Electorate development Stations Election 2017 2019 Acting Returning Officer's Polling Polling Place Address as at 1st with potential at this Number comments District July 2019 Number of % % additional location of Voters turnout turnout electorate Voters Abbey - 3 member Ward Propose existing Polling District & ABA The Tudor Centre, Holderness Road, LE4 2JU 1,842 750 49.67 328 19.43 Polling Place remains unchanged Propose existing Polling District & ABB The Corner Club, Border Drive, LE4 2JD 1,052 422 49.88 168 17.43 Polling Place remains unchanged Propose existing Polling District & ABC Stocking Farm Community Centre, Entrances From Packwood Road And Marwood Road, LE4 2ED 2,342 880 50.55 419 20.37 Polling Place remains unchanged Propose existing Polling District & ABD Community of Christ, 330 Abbey Lane, LE4 2AB 1,817 762 52.01 350 21.41 Polling Place remains unchanged Propose existing Polling District & ABE St. Patrick`s Parish Centre, Beaumont Leys Lane, LE4 2BD 2 stations 3,647 1,751 65.68 869 28.98 Polling Place remains unchanged Whilst the Polling Station is adequate, ABF All Saints Church, Highcross Street, LE1 4PH 846 302 55.41 122 15.76 we would welcome suggestions for alternative suitable premises. Propose existing Polling District & ABG Little Grasshoppers Nursery, Avebury Avenue, LE4 0FQ 2,411 1,139 66.61 555 27.01 Polling Place remains unchanged Totals 13,957 6,006 57.29 2,811 23.09 Aylestone - 2 member Ward AYA The Cricketers Public House, 1 Grace Road, LE2 8AD 2,221 987 54.86 438 22.07 The use of the Cricketers Public House is not ideal.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for Leicester City
    Final recommendations on the future electoral arrangements for Leicester City Report to the Electoral Commission June 2002 BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND © Crown Copyright 2002 Applications for reproduction should be made to: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Copyright Unit. The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by the Electoral Commission with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G. This report is printed on recycled paper. Report No: 295 2 BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND CONTENTS page WHAT IS THE BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND? 5 SUMMARY 7 1 INTRODUCTION 11 2 CURRENT ELECTORAL ARRANGEMENTS 13 3 DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS 17 4 RESPONSES TO CONSULTATION 19 5 ANALYSIS AND FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS 25 6 WHAT HAPPENS NEXT? 61 A large map illustrating the proposed ward boundaries for Leicester City is inserted inside the back cover of this report. BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND 3 4 BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND WHAT IS THE BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND? The Boundary Committee for England is a committee of the Electoral Commission, an independent body set up by Parliament under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000. The functions of the Local Government Commission for England were transferred to the Electoral Commission and its Boundary Committee on 1 April 2002 by the Local Government Commission for England (Transfer of Functions) Order 2001 (SI 2001 No. 3692). The Order also transferred to the Electoral Commission the functions of the Secretary of State in relation to taking decisions on recommendations for changes to local authority electoral arrangements and implementing them.
    [Show full text]
  • Interpreting Differential Health Outcomes Among Minority Ethnic Groups in Wave 1 and 2
    Interpreting differential health outcomes among minority ethnic groups in wave 1 and 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. It is clear from ONS quantitative studies that all minority ethnic groups in the UK have been at higher risk of mortality throughout the Covid-19 pandemic (high confidence). Data on wave 2 (1st September 2020 to 31st January 2021) shows a particular intensity in this pattern of differential mortality among Bangladeshi and Pakistani groups (high confidence). 2. This paper draws on qualitative and sociological evidence to understand trends highlighted by the ONS data and suggests that the mortality rates in Bangladeshi and Pakistani groups are due to the amplifying interaction of I) health inequities, II) disadvantages associated with occupation and household circumstances, III) barriers to accessing health care, and IV) potential influence of policy and practice on Covid-19 health- seeking behaviour (high confidence). I) Health inequities 3. Pakistani and Bangladeshi groups suffer severe, debilitating underlying conditions at a younger age and more often than other minority ethnic groups due to health inequalities. They are more likely to have two or more health conditions that interact to produce greater risk of death from Covid-19 (high confidence). 4. Long-standing health inequities across the life course explain, in part, the persistently high levels of mortality among these groups in wave 2 (high confidence). II) Disadvantages associated with occupation and household circumstances 5. Occupation: Pakistani and Bangladeshi communities are more likely to be involved in: work that carries risks of exposure (e.g. retail, hospitality, taxi driving); precarious work where it is more difficult to negotiate safe working conditions or absence for sickness; and small-scale self-employment with a restricted safety net and high risk of business collapse (high confidence).
    [Show full text]
  • Programme of Meetings – November 2012 to September 2013
    GREA GREATER WIGSTON HISTORICAL SOCIETY Wh White Gate Farm House, Newton Lane, Wigston Magna, Leics. White Gate BULLETIN 94 PROPERTY OF GWHS Kirby Muxloe Castle by Linda Forryan PROGRAMME OF MEETINGS – NOVEMBER 2012 TO SEPTEMBER 2013 Wednesday 21st November 2012 Lost Houses of Stoneygate – Neil Crutchley 7.30p.m. The Dining Room, Age Concern, Paddock Street. Wednesday 19th December 2012 Christmas Social with quiz & street views (Long Street) – Mike Forryan 7.30p.m. The Dining Room, Age Concern, Paddock Street. Wednesday 16th January 2013 PROPERTYA Victorian Gentleman – Gareth King 7.30p.m. The Dining Room, Age Concern, Paddock Street. Wednesday 20th February 2013 AGM followed by members’ Bring and Tell 7.30p.m. The Dining Room, Age Concern, Paddock Street. Wednesday 20th March 2013 The Morrison Story (Electric Vehicles made in South Wigston) – Ernest Miller 7.30p.m. The Dining Room, Age Concern, Paddock Street. Wednesday 17th April 2013 An Apothecary in 1600s – Trevor Parr 7.30p.m. The Dining Room, Age Concern, Paddock Street. Wednesday 15th May 2013 (Full Day Outing by Coach - Booking Required) Visit to Southwell Minster & Workhouse (National Trust Members bring your ticket for free admission to workhouse) Coach leaves Paddock Street 9.15a.m. OF Wednesday 19th June 2013 (Normal Evening Outing using own transport - Booking Required) Visit to Ashby-de-la Zouch, walk & buffet supper with tea/coffee Meet 6.00p.m. Paddock Street Car Park to share transport. (Note 7p.m. start at Ashby) GWHS Wednesday 21st August 2013 History & Work of the Shuttlewood Clarke Foundation – Alan Norman 7.30p.m. The Dining Room, Age Concern, Paddock Street.
    [Show full text]
  • Unemployment Bulletin April 2008
    Unemployment Bulletin April 2008 Introduction The Unemployment Bulletin provides a monthly update of the latest unemployment and benefit data for Leicester and Leicestershire. The data is sourced from Nomis (www.nomisweb.co.uk) which contains data from the Office for National Statistics, the Department of Work and Pensions and other official sources. Some figures have been calculated by Leicestershire County Council and where this is the case it is stated in the source. There are a number of ways of measuring unemployment and this bulletin mainly focuses on the Claimant Count which is a measure of the number or proportion of people receiving Job Seekers Allowance (JSA) and National Insurance Credits at Jobcentre Plus local offices. This is not an official measure of unemployment but it is the only indicative statistic available for areas smaller than Local Authorities. Official estimates of unemployment in the UK are obtained from the Labour Force Survey (LFS) using the internationally agreed International Labour Organisation (ILO) definition. The ILO definition is based on the number of people without jobs who are looking for work and are available to start work (and includes people whether or not they are eligible to received unemployment related benefits). The LFS unemployment figures which are subject to sampling differences are not reliable at small areas. The Claimant Count is released on a monthly basis and is available down to ward level, so is used as a more current indicator of unemployment levels. Using the two sources together provides a more comprehensive picture of the labour market. There is a large degree of overlap between the Claimant Count and Unemployment (LFS ILO definition) although the latter figures are generally higher.
    [Show full text]
  • Useful Addresses
    The Revd Rupert Allen DAC Secretary & Database Manager Church Buildings Team Direct Line: 0116 261 5332 (with voicemail) OFS & Diocesan Database: https://cofeportal.org/ Email: [email protected] Email (QIs, etc): [email protected] Website: www.leicester.anglican.org/dac USEFUL ADDRESSES Contents The Church Buildings Team ......................................................................................................... 2 The Archdeacons .......................................................................................................................... 2 Diocesan Registrar, Registry Clerk and Chancellor ................................................................... 2 DAC Archaeological Adviser ........................................................................................................ 2 Architect Accreditation Schemes ................................................................................................ 2 Engineer Accreditation Scheme .................................................................................................. 3 Church Buildings Council (CBC) – Consultation by DAC Secretary ......................................... 3 Historic England – Consultation by DAC Secretary except Scheduled Monument Consent .. 3 Natural England ............................................................................................................................ 3 Bat Conservation Trust ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Leicester City Labour Group City of Leicester New Ward Boundary Narrative
    Patrick Kitterick For the attention of the Local Government Boundary Commission for England Please find attached the following files in relation to Leicester City Labour Party’s submission regarding the LGBCE’s review of boundaries for Leicester City Council. -PDF Map of the New City of Leicester Ward Boundaries as proposed by Leicester City Labour Party. -PDF Table of the numbers for each ward and variances for the New City of Leicester Ward Boundaries as proposed by Leicester City Labour Party. -Narrative on Proposed New Wards -Data files supplied by Leicester City Council which I believe are compatible with LGBCE systems which give the detailed data surrounding our proposals. If this is, in any way, incompatible with the supplied maps and narrative please contact me to resolve any confusion.. The overall approach of Leicester City Labour Party has been to produce a detailed, validated, city wide proposal for Leicester. We have used the River Soar as a primary definer of boundaries in the city, we have also made greater use of the railway lines in the city as a definer of boundaries and finally we have used major roads as a point to either divide wards or build wards depending on whether they divide communities or have communities grow around them. For the necessity of providing balanced numbers we have had to use minor roads as the final definer of boundaries. Overall we have reduced the number of wards from 22 to 20 and we have kept wards co-terminus with current parliamentary boundaries, as they too provide strong community and natural boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Main Bus Routes in Central Leicestershire
    126 to Coalville via Loughborough 27.X27 to Skylink to Loughborough, 2 to Loughborough 128 to Melton Mowbray 5 5.5A to 127 to Shepshed Loughborough East Midlands Airport Cossington Melton Mowbray and Derby ROAD OAD SYSTON East SYSTON R 128 Rothley 27 Goscote 2 27 27 E 5 Main bus routes in TE N S 5A GA LA S OD -PA WO S BY HALLFIELD 5 N STO SY WESTFIELD LANE 126 127 Y A Rothley W 27 5 E S 128 AD S Queniborough O O R F N Central Leicestershire TIO STA 5 54.123 to Loughborough ATE ROA BRADG D 2 D Glenfield Hospital Beaumont OA BRAD R GATE ROAD 126.127 N SYSTON TO Centre EL 5 Leicester Leys D Skylink M A O 54 WAY 6 5A R D Y BE L X27 A LE 27 Leisure Centre E G A Stop Services N IC 123 O O E R H 128 1 TI ST IG W H A E T R S Y-PASS S H T 7 Cropston Reservoir B R 1 not in use E G E 2 Cropston R ERN 6 T O Thurcaston U T H S R A E D O W D T A 6 R Y I U R A O 2 14A, 40, 302 O E R Glenfield T W R 3 S B E 6 T C W I AN F H E LI Leicester Road L P E S R Y H G O AD S N UHL D B O U 2 A 100 K Hospital F 4 E Beaumont 54 O R E 123 O R A B R 55 L L D FOR RD.
    [Show full text]
  • Leicester City Pharmaceutical Needs Assessment 2018 SUMMARY
    Leicester City Pharmaceutical Needs Assessment 2018 SUMMARY DOCUMENT March 2018 1. Introduction The purpose of the Pharmaceutical Needs Assessment (PNA) is to: • identify pharmaceutical services currently available in the community and assess the need for them in future • provide information which helps with planning and commissioning pharmacy services • provide information which helps make a decision if someone applies to provide a new pharmacy The PNA is a legally required document which NHS England will use to make decisions about market entry of new pharmacies in the city. The local authority and local clinical commissioning group will also use the PNA to help identify any changes to the local pharmaceutical services they commission from pharmacies. This PNA has looked at pharmacies in Leicester in terms of what the needs of the people are in Leicester. It only includes community pharmacies, not hospital or prison pharmacies. For information about the detail of pharmacy provision, please see the detailed graphs and tables in the full PNA. 2. Health needs of the population of Leicester Leicester’s health needs are detailed in city’s Joint Strategic Needs Assessment, which has informed the development of the city’s Joint Health and Wellbeing Strategy, developed by the Health and Wellbeing Board. The strategy’s priorities are: • Improve outcomes for children and young people • Reduce premature mortality • Support independence for people with long term conditions • Improve mental health and emotional resilience • Focus on the wider determinants
    [Show full text]