DOCSLIB.ORG

Gegn/22/Inf/1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Gegn/22/Inf/1 GEGN/22/INF/1 2 July 2004 Original: English Report of the United Nations Group of Experts on Geographical Names on the work of its twenty-second session* (United Nations Headquarters, 20-29 April 2004) List of Documents (Annex II) and List of Participants (Annex III). * For the text of the report, see GEGN/22. 04-41552 (E) *0441552* GEGN/22/INF/1 Annex II List of documents No. Title/country/division/working group Agenda item GEGN/22/1 Provisional Agenda 2 GEGN/22/2 Statute and Rules of Procedure of the Group of Experts on Geographical Names GEGN/22/3 Provisional List of Participants GEGN/22/4 Provisional List of Documents GEGN/22/5 Provisional List of Documents according to Agenda Item GEGN/22/6 (a) Resolutions adopted at the Eight United Nations (English) Conferences on the Standardization of Geographical Names: 1967, 1972, 1977, 1982, 1987, 1992, 1998, 2002 GEGN/22/6 (b) Résolutions adoptées pár les huit conférences des (French) Nations Unies sur la normalisation des noms géographiques: 1967, 1972, 1982, 1987, 1992, 1998, 2002 GEGN/22/7 Report of the Chairperson 3 GEGN/22/8 Resolutions from the Eighth United Nations 20 Conference on the Standardization of Geographical Names, 2002, Berlin GEGN/22/9 Report of the Secretary 4 GEGN/22/10 Provisional Agenda for the Ninth United Nations 21 Conference on the Standardization of Geographical Names GEGN/22/11 Addresses of Experts on Geographical Names GEGN/22/12 Provisional Agenda for the Twenty-third 22 Session of the Group of Experts W.P. 1 The need for pronunciation guides for 16 geographical names – steps towards a solution (Submitted by Israel) W.P. 2 Pronunciation guide for Hebrew 16 geographical names (Submitted by Israel) W.P. 3 Sobre los progresos realizados en material 5 de normalización de nombres geográficos (Submitted by Argentina) W.P. 4 Preparation of new UNGEGN manuals on the 20 standardization of geographical names (Resolution VIII/15) (Submitted by UNGEGN Chair) W.P. 5 Report of the Convenor of the Working Group on 8 Training Courses in Toponymy 2002-2004 (Submitted by the Convenor) W.P. 6 Report of the Netherlands 5 (Submitted by Netherlands) 2 GEGN/22/INF/1 W.P. 7 Report of the International Cartographic 6 Organization 2002-2004 (Submitted by the ICA Liaison Officer) W.P. 8 Report of the Dutch and German-Speaking 5 Division 2002-2004 (Submitted by the Division Chair) W.P. 9 Hydrological Atlas of Austria 9 (Submitted by Austria) W.P. 10 Diachronic index of settlement names in the 9 Banat 1890-1992 (Submitted by Austria) W.P. 11 File settlement names in the Vistula catchment area 9 from 12th century to the present (Submitted by Austria) W.P. 12 Report of Austria 5 (Submitted by Austria) W.P. 13(a) The Canadian Geographical Names Service (CGNS) 9 (Submitted by Canada) W.P. 13(b) Le Service canadien de toponymie (SCT) 9 (Submitted by Canada) W.P. 14(a) Commemorative naming practices for geographical 20 features in Canada (Submitted by Canada) W.P. 14(b) Pratiques de désignation commémorative des 20 entités géographiques au Canada (Submitted by Canada) W.P. 15(a) Some Canadian activities with respect to 18 indigenous names (Submitted by Canada) W.P. 15(b) Activités canadiennes en matière de toponymie 18 autochtone (Submitted by Canada) W.P. 16 Names of countries, their capitals and inhabitants 12 (Submitted by Poland) W.P. 17 Toponymic guide collecting and elaborating 9 geographical names (Submitted by Poland) W.P. 18 Administrative division of Poland 17 (Submitted by Poland) W.P. 19 Compte rendu d’activité de la division francophone (2002-2004) 5 (Submitted by the Division Chair) W.P. 20 The first gazetteer of Latvia 1:1000 000 9 (Submitted by Latvia) W.P. 21 Report of the China Division 5 (Submitted by China Division) W.P. 22 Problems of characters and pronunciation on Chinese 16 geographical names (Submitted by China) W.P. 23 The stability and appropriateness of the United Nations 11 systems for the romanization of Arabic geographical Names (Submitted by United Kingdom) W.P. 24 Minority languages in Austria 18 (Submitted by Austria) W.P. 25 Geographical names in various versions (languages) 5 (Submitted by Norway) W.P. 26 Addresses, place-names and legislation in Sweden 5 (Submitted by Sweden) W.P. 27 The future of the Swedish civil parishes and their names 5 (Submitted by Sweden) W.P. 28 The official Swedish place-names database 9 (Submitted by Sweden) 3 GEGN/22/INF/1 W.P. 29 National report on the activities in the field of 5 Standardization of Geographical Names (Submitted by Turkey) W.P. 30 Report of the Baltic Division 5 (Submitted by the Division) W.P. 31 Report of the Lithuania 5 (Submitted by Lithuania) W.P. 32 Report of the UNGEGN “East Central and South-East 5 Europe” Division (Submitted by the Division Chair) W.P. 33 Report of Working Group on Exonyms 7 (Submitted by the Convenor) W.P. 34 Report of the Working Group on Exonyms 15 (Submitted by the Convenor) W.P. 35 Workshop on Toponymy – Frankfurt am Main 6 15 September 2003 (Submitted by Germany) W.P. 36 Training Course in Toponymy 8 Enschede, Frankfurt am Main, Berlin 11 August – 6 September 2002 (Submitted by Germany) W.P. 37 Gazetteer Federal Republic of Germany GN 250/GN 1000 9 (Submitted by Germany) W.P. 38 Dictionary of Geographical Regions of Germany 9 (Third Edition) (Submitted by Germany) W.P. 39 Geographical names in the German coastal area 9 (Submitted by Germany) W.P. 40 EuroGeoNames (EGN)- A Project on a European 9 Geographical Names GIS Network (Submitted by Germany) W.P. 41 List of Country Names in the German Language 12 (Eighth Edition) (Submitted by Germany) W.P. 42 Status report on the promotion of Minority and indigenous 20 geographical names in the Federal Republic of Germany (Submitted by Germany) W.P. 43 National Names Authorities – An Initial List 14 (Submitted by UNGEGN Chair and UNGEGN Secretariat) W.P. 44 Kven Place-Names 18 (Submitted by Norway) W.P. 45 Twenty-second International Congress of Onomastic 6 Sciences- Pisa (Italy) 28 August-4 September 2005 (Submitted by Austria) W.P. 46 Report by the Convenor of the Working Group on 7 Romanization Systems (Submitted by the Convenor) W.P. 47 New Legislation in Estonia concerning geographical names 17 (Submitted by Estonia) W.P. 48 Updates to the report on the current status of United Nations 11 Romanization Systems for geographical names (Submitted by UNGEGN Working Group on Romanization) W.P. 49 Toponymic guidelines for map editors and other 17 Editors –Finland (Fourth, revised edition 2004) (Submitted by Finland) W.P. 50 Report of the Norden Division 5 (Submitted by the Division Chair) W.P. 51 Council of Geographic Names Authorities 6 (Submitted by United States) 4 GEGN/22/INF/1 W.P. 52 Report of the Pan American Institute of Geography & History 6 (Submitted by PAIGH Liaison Officer) W.P. 53 Report the Islamic Republic of Iran 5 (Submitted by Iran) W.P. 54 Transcription Procedure for Iranian Geographical Names 11 (Submitted by Iran) W.P. 55 Consultation on the Norwegian Place-Names Act 5 (Submitted by Norway) W.P. 56 Report of the United States/Canada Division 5 (Submitted by the Division) W.P. 57 (a) Un cours d’introduction à la toponymie diffusé sur le web 8 (Submitted by Canada) W.P. 57 (b) An introductory toponymy course on the web 8 (Submitted by Canada) W.P. 58 Contact information - national names authorities 14 or other agencies, March 2004 (Submitted by UNGEGN Chair and Secretariat) W.P. 59 A Japanese Edition of the Textbook 8 “Toponymy – The Lore, Laws and Language of Geographical Names” (Submitted by Israel) W.P. 60 Report of the United Kingdom Division 5 (Submitted by the United Kingdom Division) W.P. 61 Report of the Working Group on Publicity and Funding 13 (Submitted by United Kingdom) W.P. 62 Listes de noms de pays et de capitales IGN CNT 12 AFNOR/ISO ONY Particularités de chaque publication en 2004 (Submitted by France) W.P. 63 Romano-Hellenic Division Report 5 (Submitted by Romano-Hellenic Division) W.P. 64 Multilingual Glossary of Geographical Features 9 (Submitted by Italy) W.P. 65 Summary Report of the Working Group on 7 Country Names (Submitted by the Convenor) W.P. 66 United States Department of State Lists of Independent 12 States of the World and of Dependencies and Areas of Special Sovereignty (Submitted by United States of America) W.P. 67 Report of the UNGEGN Liaison with the Scientific 6 Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR) (Submitted by SCAR) W.P. 68 Report of the Asia South East-Pacific South West Division 5 (Submitted by Division Chair) W.P. 69 Central Place Name Register of Norway 9 (Submitted by Norway) W.P. 70 Report of Asia South-West Division (other than Arabic) 5 (Submitted by the Islamic Republic of Iran) W.P. 71 Trabajos realizados en la Repúblic de Cuba para la 9 preparación de documentos de datos toponumicos y nomenclatures (Submitted by Cuba) W.P. 72 Tratamiento dado a lost exónimos en la República 15 de Cuba (Submitted by Cuba) 5 GEGN/22/INF/1 W.P. 73 Standard Lebanese Geographic Names Romanization 11 Rules (Submitted by Lebanon) W.P. 74 Geographic Names in the United Arab Emirates 5 (Submitted by United Arab Emirates) W.P. 75 U.N. Work on Geographical Names 20 (Submitted by Sweden) W.P. 76 Report of the Republic of Mozambique 5 (Submitted by Mozambique) W.P.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • GIS for National Mapping and Charting
    copyright swisstopo GIS for National Mapping and Charting Esri® GIS Solutions in Europe GIS for National Mapping and Charting Solutions for Land, Sea, and Air National mapping organisations (NMOs) are under pressure to generate more products and services in less time and with fewer resources. On-demand products, online services, and the continuous production of maps and charts require modern technology and new workflows. GIS for National Mapping and Charting Esri has a history of working with NMOs to find solutions that meet the needs of each country. Software, training, and services are available from a network of distributors and partners across Europe. Esri’s ArcGIS® geographic information system (GIS) technology offers powerful, database-driven cartography that is standards based, open, and interoperable. Map and chart products can be produced from large, multipurpose geographic data- bases instead of through the management of disparate datasets for individual products. This improves quality and consistency while driving down production costs. ArcGIS models the world in a seamless database, facilitating the production of diverse digital and hard-copy products. Esri® ArcGIS provides NMOs with reliable solutions that support scientific decision making for • E-government applications • Emergency response • Safety at sea and in the air • National and regional planning • Infrastructure management • Telecommunications • Climate change initiatives The Digital Atlas of Styria provides many types of map data online including this geology map. 2 Case Study—Romanian Civil Aeronautical Authority Romanian Civil Aeronautical Authority (RCAA) regulates all civil avia- tion activities in the country, including licencing pilots, registering aircraft, and certifying that aircraft and engine designs are safe for use.
    [Show full text]
  • Long Term Management Nr Final.Pdf 725.91 KB
    Section III – Thematic Issues ***** 5.0 Long-Term Management of Natural Resources EXPERTS Hannah Jaenicke 1, André Bassolé 2. Based on first version by André Nonguierma 3 and Philippe Mayaux 4 INSTITUTIONS 1 Consultant, Burghof 26, 53501 Grafschaft, Germany. [email protected] 2 Centre d’Etudes, de Recherche et de Production en Information pour l’Environnement et le Développement Durable (CERPINEDD) 979, Avenue de l’Armée, Cité An3, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. [email protected] 3 United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (UNECA), Information, Sciences & Technology Division, P.O Box 3005 Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. [email protected] 4 Institute for Environment and Sustainability, DG Joint Research Centre - European Commission, TP 440, 2749 via E. Fermi, I-21027 Ispra (VA), Italy. [email protected] CONTRIBUTIONS The following individuals have provided valuable written comments during the revision process: Mamdouh M. Abdeen (NARSS, Egypt); Ganiyu I. Agbaje (NARSDA, Nigeria); Luc André (MRAC, Belgium); Islam Abou El- Magd (NARSS, Egypt); Johannes van der Kwast (AfroMaison, The Netherlands); Richard Mavisi Liahona (MHEST, Kenya); Ana Morgado (BRAGMA); Paolo Roggeri (JRC, EC); Abel Romoelo (CSIR, South Africa), Hervé Trebossen (OSS); Peter Zeil (PLUS, Austria). In addition, the active contribution of the delegates to the workshop in Sharm-El-Sheikh 25-26 June 2013, and the comments provided during the GMES and Africa online discussion forum in 2010 and 2011 are acknowledged. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary
    [Show full text]
  • Land Administration and Spatial Data Infrastructures
    Land Administration and Spatial Data Infrastructures Ian WILLIAMSON, Donald GRANT and Abbas RAJABIFARD Australia Key words: Land administration, SDI SUMMARY Internationally the spatial data infrastructure (SDI) concept has focussed on national SDIs. However SDIs are increasingly focussing on large scale people relevant data (land parcel based data or build environmental data) with the result that today it is suggested most SDI activity worldwide is at this level. A central aspect in understanding these developments is the evolution of mapping, and the growth of land administration systems and national mapping initiatives in different countries. The objective of this paper is to discuss the evolving nature of SDIs away from a simple national concept to a complex hierarchy where large scale SDIs are the major influence. The paper concludes with a discussion of policy development and the impact of institutional arrangements in managing spatial information. TS 1 – SDI and Cadastre 1/13 Ian Williamson, Donald Grant and Abbas Rajabifard TS1.1 Land Administration and Spatial Data Infrastructures From Pharaohs to Geoinformatics FIG Working Week 2005 and GSDI-8 Cairo, Egypt April 16-21, 2005 Land Administration and Spatial Data Infrastructures Ian WILLIAMSON, Donald GRANT and Abbas RAJABIFARD, Australia 1. INTRODUCTION The development of the spatial data infrastructure (SDI) has evolved as a central driving force in the management of spatial information over the last decade. The concept gained a major impetus from the statement by President Clinton in 1994 (Executive Order, 1994) regarding its application in the USA. Since this time discussion about SDI principles and experiences has been a focus on many conferences and seminars world wide, particularly at the level of United Nations meetings such as the regular United Nations Cartographic Conferences for both Asia and the Pacific, and the Americas.
    [Show full text]
  • The SALB Project: Current Status and New Challenge for the Americas
    The SALB project: Current Status and new challenge for the Americas S. Ebener 1, B. Brookes 2, Y. Guigoz 1, Z. El Morjani 1, S. Chang 2 1 WHO, 20 av. Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland, Tel.: +41 22 791.47.44 Fax.: +41 22 791.43.28 Email: [email protected] 2 Dag Hammarskjold Library United Nations New York, N.Y. 10017 Tel: +1 212 963 7425 Fax +1 212 963 1779 Email: [email protected] Abstract The progress made in information technology has increased the flow and level of detail of information now available. This sometimes makes it hard to select the right information for the right context. One of the difficulties is the lack of proper documentation regarding the spatial and temporal representation of this information. In order to respond to this issue regarding information attached to administrative units, the Second Administrative Level Boundaries data set project (SALB) has been launched in 2001 in the context of the United Nations Geographic Information Working Group (UNGIWG). This project is the first attempt, proposed by UNGIWG, to take advantage of existing information and data about administrative boundaries and to meet the general need for a consistent global coverage down to the second administrative level including the changes that occur through time. Firstly, this paper describes what SALB is and how the process in place is used for collecting, compiling, cleaning and publishing validated information and maps for the Americas. It then describes the state of the continent’s progress before presenting the new objective that the project has undertaken: make SALB reach the present.
    [Show full text]
  • Giscience Studies and Policies in Korea: Focus on Web GIS and National GIS Cha Yong Ku* ‧ Chulsue Hwang** ‧ Jinmu Choi***
    Journal of the Korean Geographical Society, Vol.47, No.4, 2012(592~605) Cha Yong Ku·Chulsue Hwang·Jinmu Choi GIScience Studies and Policies in Korea: Focus on Web GIS and National GIS Cha Yong Ku* ‧ Chulsue Hwang** ‧ Jinmu Choi*** 한국의 지리정보학과 지리정보 정책: Web GIS와 국가 GIS를 중심으로 구자용*·황철수**·최진무*** Abstract : This article reviewed issues in Korean geographical journals: web GIS and National GIS. Web GIS in Korea is now evolving to mobile GIS, which requires portable hardware, wireless Internet, and GPS receiver. The new trend of mobile GIS is using a smart phone. Recently, a variety of studies for the mobile App and mobile Web in Korea has been developed. With explosive information on the Web 2.0, the Korean government has built the Human-Oriented Geographic Information System (HOGIS) in which Ontology was implemented for semantic query on the Web. On the government side, Korean government has produced various nationwide data through 4-phase NGIS project. Current NGIS (4th phase: 2011- 2015) moves toward a Korean Green Geospatial Society using geospatial information as a new growth engine for the future. Key Words :Web GIS, Mobile GIS, Web 2.0, GeoOntology, NGIS, NSDI 요약 : 본고에서는 한국의 지리학 관련 논문들에 대해 가장 급속하게 발전하고 있는 웹 GIS와 국가 GIS 서비스 라는 두 분야에 대한 연구동향 및 방향을 논의하였다. 한국의 웹 GIS는 현재 모바일 GIS로 진화하고 있는데, 휴대용 하드웨어, 무선 인터넷, GIS 수신기를 통합적으로 필요로 한다. 따라서 모바일 GIS의 새로운 방향은 스 마트 폰을 이용하는 것으로 최근 다양한 모바일 엡과 웹이 개발되고 있다. 웹 2.0 기술과 함께 폭발적으로 증가 한 정보를 관리할 수 있도록 한국 정보는 인문지리정보시스템(HOGIS)을 개발하고 있으며, 여기서 온톨로지를 이용해 국토공간에 대한 시멘틱 검색이 가능하도록 개발하고 있다.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Report of United Kingdom *
    Country Report: United Kingdom HIGH LEVEL FORUM ON GLOBAL CONFERENCE ROOM PAPER GEOSPATIAL MANAGEMENT INFORMATION NO. 12 First Forum Seoul, Republic of Korea, 24-26 October 2011 Country Report of United Kingdom * ___________________ * Submitted by: Dr Vanessa Lawrence CB, Director General & Chief Executive, Ordnance Survey Page 1 of 10 Country Report: United Kingdom Global Geospatial Information Management Country Report – United Kingdom (UK) Administrative geography of the United Kingdom The United Kingdom comprises the countries of England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. Since 1998, selected powers of the UK Parliament have been transferred to legislative bodies located in Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales, conferring varying degrees of autonomy on those parts of the union. This document covers the management of geospatial information in the UK as a whole. Where arrangements differ in the devolved administrations these are described in the relevant sections. The United Kingdom is a member of the European Union, and as such is subject to EU directives and regulations. A number of these legislative instruments have affected the management of spatial information in the UK, most notably the INSPIRE Directive. The UK geospatial information environment The United Kingdom benefits from a combination of: long established public sector data providers such as Ordnance Survey and the UK Hydrographic Office; a range of private sector suppliers for data as diverse as terrain models and aerial imagery; and a mature systems supply industry providing a wide range of hardware, software and systems. Geospatial information users are found in all areas of British economic, social and administrative life. Geospatial information is relied upon by a wide range of public and private sector organisations in the delivery of their business functions and decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Data Infrastructures in the United Kingdom: State of Play 2011
    Spatial Data Infrastructures in The United Kingdom: State of play 2011 SPATIAL APPLICATIONS DIVISION K.U.LEUVEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT Celestijnenlaan 200 E, BE-3001 LEUVEN TEL.: 32 16 32 97 32 FAX: 32 16 32 97 24 URL: http://www.sadl.kuleuven.be Report meta-information Title Spatial Data Infrastructures in The United Kingdom: State of play 2011 Creator Danny Vandenbroucke & Dimitrios Biliouris (SADL) Date Issued 2010-09-01 Subject INSPIRE State of Play Publisher K.U.Leuven (SADL + ICRI) Description This report is summarizing the review of SDI in the UK Contributor Danny Vandenbroucke & Dimitrios Biliouris (SADL), Katleen Janssen (ICRI), Joep Crompvoets (OE) Previous Contributor Catharina Bamps, Jos Van Orshove, Danny Vandenbroucke (SADL); Peter Beusen, Katleen Janssen (ICRI); Mr. Connelly Russell, Mr Mark Linehan, Neil Sutherland (UK) Format MS Word 97/2000 Audience INSPIRE stakeholders Identifier rcr11UKv122 Language EN Coverage Summer 2010 – Spring 2011 Version number Date Modified by Comments 1.0 2002-12-12 Catharina Bamps First version (SADL) & Peter Beusen (ICRI) 2.0 2002-12-20 Jos Van Orshoven Completion & harmonization (SADL) with 31 other country reports 3.0 2003-08-05 Catharina Bamps Consolidation and integration of (SADL) comments received from Mr. K. Murray and Mr. Earnshaw (Ordnance Survey GB) Addition of : - Report meta-information - Executive summary - Abbreviations/acronyms 4.0 2003-08-14 Jos Van Orshoven Harmonisation with 31 other (SADL) country reports 5.0 2004-07-09 Katleen Janssen (ICRI) General review, correction and update of legal framework 6.0 2004-07-09 Catharina Bamps Integration of comments from (SADL) Mr. Connelly, Russell, Policy Co-ordinator OSNI (Response OSNI)’, Mr Mark Linehan, director AGI and from limited review of web sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Technologies - Critical Thinking for Critical Times
    FINAL CONFERENCE PROGRAM Sixth Caribbean GIS Conference November 12-16, 2012 Montego Bay, Jamaica Spatial Technologies - Critical Thinking for Critical Times Welcome! The Urban and Regional Information Systems Association (URISA) has previously presented five conferences focused on the effective application of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and other information technologies within the Caribbean. Previous conferences took place in Jamaica (2001), Barbados (2004), the Bahamas (2006), the Cayman Islands (2008) and Trinidad and Tobago (2010). In total, more than 1,000 individuals have attended previous programs. The inaugural URISA Caribbean Conference in 2001 took place at this exact location in Montego Bay and we are excited to be going back to where the first conference occurred! We hope the conference will be a valuable contribution to your professional development. Objectives of URISA's Caribbean GIS Conference: • To inform a broad cross-section of Caribbean users about GIS technology and applications • To share experiences regarding GIS implementation and management issues • To establish new relationships with the vendor/consultant community • To provide workshops and sessions that are application driven, and are relevant to the Caribbean community of GIS users • To foster a Caribbean GIS network • To assess the state of readiness of national and regional Spatial Data Infrastructures GISCI points earned for attending one workshop and this conference = .6 Education Points Conference Sponsors URISA could not have hosted this event without the generous contributions of our sponsors: Platinum Sponsor Gold Sponsors Bronze Sponsors 2012 URISA Caribbean GIS Conference Committee The Conference relies on the expertise and efforts of the volunteer conference committee members to present an important educational event.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 10 – Glossary of Terms
    Mapping Guidelines - Appendix 10 Glossary of Terms Table of Contents OSi .................................................................................................................................. 2 County Series/Cassini Maps ................................................................................................. 2 NPS Maps ......................................................................................................................... 2 Irish Grid Maps/National Grid Maps ...................................................................................... 2 ITM Maps .......................................................................................................................... 2 Orthophotos ...................................................................................................................... 2 Map Scales ........................................................................................................................ 2 Digital Maps ...................................................................................................................... 2 Raster Map........................................................................................................................ 3 Vector Map........................................................................................................................ 3 CAD files ........................................................................................................................... 3 Layers .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • National Geospatial Strategy – Call for Evidence
    National Geospatial Strategy – call for evidence August 2 018 Geospatial Commission Consultation 2 Introduction Contents 1 2 3 4 5 3 Foreword 5 Introduction 10 Emerging 13 Supporting 17 Enhancing the 23 Driving investment 28 Annexes geospatial innovation in the UK’s geospatial and productivity strategy geospatial sector assets in geospatial applications By the Chancellor 5 The power of 10 Scope 13 Developing skills 17 Protecting and 25 Key sectors 28 Annex A: of the Duchy of place enhancing our where we believe Geospatial Lancaster and 12 Call for evidence 14 Promoting data assets there is the Commission Minister for Cabinet 7 Work to date – three key geospatial highest latent Charter Office, the Rt Hon themes careers 19 Standards value David Lidington 9 What will happen 30 Annex B: CBE MP next 14 Access to data 20 Encouraging 25 Regulation Geospatial collaboration Commission 15 Addressing 26 Collaborating Framework 21 The role of the with our Document 15 Future wider public international technology sector partners 38 Annex C: needs and Summary of opportunities 21 Geographic questions coverage Geospatial Commission Consultation 3 Introduction Foreword The data revolution is changing the Decisions about public and private sector way we see the world and the way we investment in the networks and infrastructure live our lives. necessary to support these technologies require geospatial data to create a holistic Technologies such as artificial intelligence view of the local, national and international (AI), blockchain, cloud and edge computing environments from land, water and air. are shaping how we access, use, move and store data about ourselves and our The increasing relevance of geospatial data environment, while the connectivity of the and technologies and ubiquity of applications Internet of Things and future 5G networks present a clear and valuable global economic are making intelligent applications available opportunity.
    [Show full text]
  • On GI/GIS Matters for the PHARE Countries
    2001 EDITION Workshop on GI/GIS matters for the PHARE countries THEME 1 EUROPEAN General PAPERS & STUDIES PAPERS COMMISSION 1statistics A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server (http://europa.eu.int). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2001 © European Communities, 2001 Printed in Belgium PRINTED ON WHITE CHLORINE-FREE PAPER Population and social conditions 3/2001/E/15 Workshop on GI/GIS matters for the PHARE countries Held in Luxembourg 24 Oct. 2001 The views expressed in this document are the author’s and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European Commission Copyright: European Commission 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS Meeting of the Workshop on GI/GIS matters for Phare Countries – Final report 4 WS/PHARE-Doc. 2 Management of territorial units over time 25 WS/PHARE-Doc. 3a. Questionnaire on the use of GI and GIS in the NSIs and NMAs of the Candidate Countries; Analytical report 43 WS/PHARE-Doc. 3b. Mission report of the visit to the NMA and NGI of Poland and Romania 89 WS/PHARE-Doc. 4. Report on the use of GI in CSO and the NMA in Poland 123 WS/PHARE-Doc. 5a. Report on the use of GI in the NSI in Romania 131 WS/PHARE-Doc. 5b. Report on the use of GI in the NMA in Romania 143 WS/PHARE-Doc. 6. Report on the use of GI in the NSI in Estonia 159 WS/PHARE-Doc. 6b. Report on the use of Census Maps in Estonia 169 WS/PHARE-Doc.
    [Show full text]
  • GIS Grows in European Cadastres and National Mapping Agencies On
    Toward Alternative Futures Esri • Spring 2011 esri.com/arcnews Vol. 33 No. 1 On Scale and ComplexityEtc. and the A Web-Based Solution for Planning and Policy Analysis “Facts” Need for Spatial Analysis Community Analyst Now Available By Carl Steinitz, Wiley Professor of Landscape Architecture and Planning Following a successful beta program, Esri is in the process of releasing Esri Community Analyst. This on- line GIS solution is specifically designed for policy makers, government agencies, and civic organizations Emeritus, Graduate School of Design, Harvard University that have little or no technical GIS experience. Through the online data and mapping tools, users can The best definition of design is that of Herbert Simon: “Everyone designs who quickly explore the geographic characteristics of any area and develop the right strategies for policies and “History” devises courses of action aimed at changing existing situations into preferred resource allocation in their communities. continued on page 17 ones.” (Herbert Simon—The Sciences of the Artificial, 1968). “Constants” I come from a professional culture in which I began as an architecture student in a school of architecture; I then studied city and regional planning and urban design, and I have taught in a landscape architecture department and organized continued on page 3 Underpinning Land Management and Sustainable Development “Contingencies” Too GIS Grows in EuropeanMany! Cadastres Try to “Capture” T=0 Major and National MappingT=N Agencies “Generating” Time Present Assumptions/Ranges Time Future A traditional cadastre is an official record of the dimensions and value of land parcels, used to record ownership and assist in calculating taxes.
    [Show full text]