DOCSLIB.ORG

Dipteran Larvae Infestation of Leatherback Turtle

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dipteran Larvae Infestation of Leatherback Turtle DIPTERAN LARVAE INFESTATION OF LEATHERBACK TURTLE (DERMOCHELYS CORIACEA) NESTS ON GANDOCA BEACH, COSTA RICA A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of Graduate Studies of The University of Guelph by SONIA GAUTREAU In partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science February, 2007 © Sonia Gautreau, 2007 ABSTRACT DIPTERAN LARVAE INFESTATION OF LEATHERBACK TURTLE (DERMOCHELYS CORIACEA) NESTS ON GANDOCA BEACH, COSTA RICA Sonia Gautreau Co-Advisor: Dr. Ronald J. Brooks University of Guelph, 2007 Co-Advisor: Dr. Steve A. Marshall We examined the ecological characteristics of dipteran larvae infesting Leatherback nests on Gandoca Beach, Costa Rica in 2005-2006. Fly infestation exceeded 75% of nests, but levels were much lower when evaluated as the percent of the clutch infested. Fly larvae seemed to act mostly as scavengers, but a few live hatchlings were attacked indicating that flies also act opportunistically as predators. Several dipteran species were recorded with the sarcophagid Eumacronychia sternalis being dominant. Back-calculations from the development timeframe for E. sternalis showed that infestation happened shortly after hatchling emergence, suggesting that flies are attracted to the nest because of emanating odours of decomposing material brought to the surface by emerging hatchlings. Sampling year, bacteria or fungus invasion, and the interaction between nest depth and the number of dead hatchlings best predicted the incidence of larvae within nests. Infestation levels in egg hatcheries were not higher, possibly because of protective baskets. Our results suggest that flies do not seriously threaten Leatherback turtle populations in Gandoca, but they can cause incidental mortality and measures should be taken to protect nests against larval infestation. i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my charismatic advisor, Dr. Ronald Brooks for believing in me and allowing me to pursue my dreams of working with Leatherbacks in Costa Rica. I will be forever grateful to you. I extend a warm thanks to the members of my advisory committee: Dr. Steve Marshall and Dr. Jinzhong Fu for providing insight and guidance throughout this work. Steve, thanks for initiating me to the world of flies. An enormous thanks goes to Didiher Chacón-Chaverri for his turtle expertise and for letting me join the ANAI team. This work would not have been possible without the help and encouragement of Jormmy Machado Hernández, your determination and devotion will forever amaze me. To my field assistant Yoela Matute López, thanks for your hard work, free spirit, and for putting humour in the gory job of nest excavations. I would not have survived in the Costa Rican jungle without the knowledge of my good friend Luis Corea Baltodano. Luis, gracias por tu amistad y tu ayuda durante todo mi tiempo en Gandoca. Me enseñaste muchas cosas sobre las tortugas que no habría podido aprender en libros. Thanks to Adelina López, la familia Velásquez, Claudio Quesada and to the rest of ANAI’s staff for their hospitality, support and friendship throughout my stay in Costa Rica. I am very grateful for the relentless work of the research assistants and the volunteers, all of you made my field work more enjoyable and successful. A la gente de Gandoca, nunca les voy a olvidar y espero verlos todos algún día. ¡Muchas gracias por todo! I give many thanks to all of my labmates and my other friends in Guelph for their friendship and assistance. Although my time in Guelph was relatively short, I am glad I had the opportunity to meet, work and just hang out with such an amazing group of people. I would like to acknowledge everyone who has helped me with fly identification, statistics and thesis editing: Dr. Mehrdad Parchami-Araghi, Dr. Matthias Buck, Manuel ii Zumbado, Dr. Thomas Pape, Michelle Edwards, Matt Partridge, Dr. Thomas Nudds, Joe Crawley and Njal Rollinson. I want to recognize all of my biology professors at Université de Moncton, especially Dr. François Fournier, Dr. Céline Bérubé, Patrick Maltais and Dr. Stéphane Reebs for initiating me to research and for always being available to me when I needed advice. Vous avez énormément contribué à mon cheminement en sciences et j’en suis très reconnaissante. To my family, a special thanks for encouraging me to reach my goals in life and for providing endless support. Je vous aime beacoup! Thanks to my mom who is always there for me whenever I need her, I could not have accomplished so much without you. Deep gratitude is extended to my late father for his love and wisdom. I will forever remember all of our camping trips and it is because of his love of nature that I am a biologist today. An enormous thanks goes to all of my friends at home and around the world, and to all the wonderful people I met travelling in Central America. Although you may not always have understood why I wanted to spend months “in the middle of nowhere” chasing turtles on the beach at night, you were always supportive and listened to hours of stories I had to tell. You have truly made my life more enjoyable. This research was possible thanks to the generous funding of WWF-Canada, NSERC, OGS and several scholarships provided through U of Guelph. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ....................................................................................................................... I ACKNOWLEDGMENTS................................................................................................II TABLE OF CONTENTS............................................................................................... IV LIST OF TABLES.........................................................................................................VII LIST OF FIGURES........................................................................................................ IX GENERAL INTRODUCTION 1.1. SPECIES INFORMATION.................................................................................................. 1 1.2. DISTRIBUTION ............................................................................................................... 1 1.3. STATUS ......................................................................................................................... 2 1.4. REPRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 3 1.5. INCUBATION AND THE NEST ENVIRONMENT ................................................................. 4 1.6. HATCHING AND EMERGENCE OF SEA TURTLE HATCHLINGS........................................... 5 1.7. DECOMPOSITION AND SAPROPHAGOUS FLIES ............................................................... 6 1.8. EFFECTS OF DIPTERAN INFESTATION ON SEA TURTLE NESTS ....................................... 9 1.9. FLY SPECIES RECORDED FROM SEA TURTLE NESTS.................................................... 12 1.10. MECHANISMS OF DIPTERAN INFESTATION OF SEA TURTLE NESTS ............................ 12 1.11. OBJECTIVES OF STUDY.............................................................................................. 16 GENERAL METHODOLOGY 2.1. STUDY SITE................................................................................................................. 17 2.2. BEACH PREPARATION AND NEST TRANSLOCATION..................................................... 19 2.3. COMMUNAL EGG HATCHERIES ................................................................................... 20 2.4. NEST IDENTIFICATION................................................................................................. 21 2.5. POST-EMERGENCE NEST EXCAVATIONS...................................................................... 22 iv CHAPTER I VARIATION IN LEATHERBACK TURTLE NEST SUCCESS ON GANDOCA BEACH DUE TO INFESTATION BY DIPTERAN LARVAE 3.1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 24 3.2. MATERIALS AND METHODS ...................................................................................... 26 Effects of infestation on nest success........................................................................ 26 Larval feeding preferences........................................................................................ 28 3.3. RESULTS..................................................................................................................... 29 Effects of infestation on nest success........................................................................ 29 Larval feeding preferences........................................................................................ 32 3.4. DISCUSSION................................................................................................................ 37 Effects of infestation on nest success........................................................................ 37 Larval feeding preferences........................................................................................ 40 CHAPTER II MECHANISMS OF DIPTERAN LARVAE INFESTATION OF LEATHERBACK TURTLE NESTS: WHO, WHEN AND HOW? 4.1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 44 4.2. MATERIALS AND METHODS ...................................................................................... 47 Dipteran species recorded......................................................................................... 47 Timing of infestation................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Winged Undertakers Digest the Deceased STORY and PHOTOS by LOWELL WASHBURN
    nderrated and nappreciated Winged Undertakers Digest the Deceased STORY AND PHOTOS BY LOWELL WASHBURN 28 Iowa outdoors • JULY / AUGUST 2008 Although no one can for sure say why, turkey vultures have become increasingly common during the past two decades. Often referred to as “TVs” by birding enthusiasts, turkey vultures derive their name from the featherless, red heads of adults. And there’s no denying that, at least from a distance, a roosted vulture does somewhat resemble a male wild turkey. There’s good reason for the vulture’s distinctive, though ugly, bare head. As an avid consumer of carrion, TVs routinely forage in some pretty nasty places. The complete lack of head and neck feathers aids in maintaining cleanliness. Contrary to popular belief, vultures are among the cleanest of birds, spending up to four hours per day bathing and preening—more time than is documented for any other Iowa bird. WWW.IOWADNR.GOV 29 “It’s a dirty job, but someone has to do it.” t’s a dirty job, but someone has to do it.” than a bit disgusting. But for hungry vultures, the opportunity We’ve all heard that line a thousand times. represented nothing less than a four-star banquet—an asphalt But for me, the well-worn phrase gained new version of a carrion eater’s 21 Club of New York fame. “ meaning as I paused to watch members of a local After slowing and pulling aside to observe, it quickly Ihighway cleanup crew doing their dirty job. became apparent this bird show was not designed The crew was a gathering of turkey vultures, and for anyone with a queasy stomach.
    [Show full text]
  • Are Biologicals Smart Mole Cricket Control?
    Are biologicals smart mole cricket control? by HOWARD FRANK / University of Florida ost turf managers try to control mole faster than the biopesticides, but the biopesticides cricket pests with a bait, or granules or affect a narrower range of non-target organisms and liquid containing something that kills are more environmentally acceptable. The "biora- them. That "something" may be chemi- tional" chemicals are somewhere in between, be- M cause they tend to work more slowly than the tradi- cal materials (a chemical pesticide) or living biologi- cal materials (a biopesticide). tional chemicals, and to have less effect on animals Some of the newer chemical materials, called other than insects. "biorationals," are synthetic chemicals that, for ex- Natives not pests ample, mimic the action of insects' growth hor- The 10 mole cricket species in the U.S. and its mones to interfere with development. territories (including Puerto Rico and the Virgin Is- The biological materials may be insect-killing ne- lands) differ in appearance, distribution, behavior matodes (now available commercially) or fungal or and pest status. bacterial pathogens (being tested experimentally). In fact, the native mole crickets are not pests. These products can be placed exactly where they Our pest mole crickets are immigrant species. are needed. In general, the chemical pesticides work The three species that arouse the ire of turf man- agers in the southeastern states all belong Natural enemies to the genus Scapteriscus. They came from Introducing the specialist natural ene- South America, arriving at the turn of the mies from South America to the southeast- century in ships' ballast.
    [Show full text]
  • Tree Swallows (Tachycineta Bicolor) Nesting on Wetlands Impacted by Oil Sands Mining Are Highly Parasitized by the Bird Blow Fly Protocalliphora Spp
    Journal of Wildlife Diseases, 43(2), 2007, pp. 167–178 # Wildlife Disease Association 2007 TREE SWALLOWS (TACHYCINETA BICOLOR) NESTING ON WETLANDS IMPACTED BY OIL SANDS MINING ARE HIGHLY PARASITIZED BY THE BIRD BLOW FLY PROTOCALLIPHORA SPP. Marie-Line Gentes,1 Terry L. Whitworth,2 Cheryl Waldner,3 Heather Fenton,1 and Judit E. Smits1,4 1 Department of Veterinary Pathology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5B4, Canada 2 Whitworth Pest Solutions, Inc., 2533 Inter Avenue, Puyallup, Washington, USA 3 Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5B4, Canada 4 Corresponding author (email: [email protected]) ABSTRACT: Oil sands mining is steadily expanding in Alberta, Canada. Major companies are planning reclamation strategies for mine tailings, in which wetlands will be used for the bioremediation of water and sediments contaminated with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and naphthenic acids during the extraction process. A series of experimental wetlands were built on companies’ leases to assess the feasibility of this approach, and tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor) were designated as upper trophic biological sentinels. From May to July 2004, prevalence and intensity of infestation with bird blow flies Protocalliphora spp. (Diptera: Calliphoridae) were measured in nests on oil sands reclaimed wetlands and compared with those on a reference site. Nestling growth and survival also were monitored. Prevalence of infestation was surprisingly high for a small cavity nester; 100% of the 38 nests examined were infested. Nests on wetlands containing oil sands waste materials harbored on average from 60% to 72% more blow fly larvae than those on the reference site.
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera: Tachinidae) Larvae
    Welch: Competition by Ormia depleta 497 INTRASPECIFIC COMPETITION FOR RESOURCES BY ORMIA DEPLETA (DIPTERA: TACHINIDAE) LARVAE C. H. WELCH USDA/ARS/cmave, 1600 SW 23rd Drive, Gainesville, FL 32608 ABSTRACT Ormia depleta is a parasitoid of pest mole crickets in the southeastern United States. From 2 to 8 larvae of O. depleta were placed on each of 368 mole cricket hosts and allowed to de- velop. The weights of the host crickets, number of larvae placed, number of resulting pupae, and the weights of those pupae were all factored to determine optimal parasitoid density per host under laboratory rearing conditions. Based on larval survival and pupal weight, this study indicates that 4-5 larvae per host is optimal for laboratory rearing. Key Words: biocontrol, Scapteriscus, parasitoid, superparasitism RESUMEN Ormia depleta es un parasitoide de grillotopos en el sureste de los Estados Unidos. Entre 2 y 8 larvas de O. depleta se colocaron en 368 grillotopos huéspedes y se dejaron madurar. El peso de los huéspedes, el número de larvas de O. depleta colocadas, el número de pupas re- sultantes y el peso de las pupas fueron usados para determinar la densidad optima de para- sitoides en cada huésped para ser usadas en la reproducción de este parasitoide en el laboratorio. Nuestros resultados muestran que entre 4 y 5 larvas por cada grillotopo es la densidad optima para la reproducción en el laboratorio de este parasitoide. Translation provided by the author. Ormia depleta (Wiedemann) is a parasitoid of protocol requires hand inoculation of 3 planidia Scapteriscus spp. mole crickets, imported pests of under the posterior margin of the pronotum of turf and pasture grasses in the southeastern each host (R.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey Vulture AKA: Turkey Buzzard, Buzzard, Vulture, Carrion Crow, Carrion Buzzard, Etc
    Turkey Vulture AKA: Turkey Buzzard, Buzzard, Vulture, Carrion Crow, Carrion Buzzard, etc. Scientific Classification: Animalia, Chordata, Aves, Incertae sedis (disputed), Cathartidae; Cathartes; C. aura. Bird Size & Markings: Adult Turkey Vultures can be 32” long, stand 30” high and have 6 foot wingspans. Males and females have brownish-black body plum- age, silvery-gray flight feathers, bare red heads and a short yellow hooked bill. Turkey Vultures have very limited vocalization; it can only hiss or grunt. Habitat: The Turkey Vulture is the most abundant vulture in the Americas. It is commonly found in open and semi-open areas throughout the Americas from southern Canada to Cape Horn. It is a permanent resident in southern US States, though northern birds may migrate as far as South America. It prefers to roost on tall dead trees or high bare cliffs. It will roost on man-made structures such as water towers, skyscrapers, billboards and other structures of sufficient height. Nesting/Dens: There is little or no construction of a nest; eggs are laid on bare surfaces in protected locations such as a cliff, cave, burrow or inside a hollow A Turkey Vulture’s primary method of defence tree. They lay 1 or 2 eggs for each brood. Chicks fledge 9 to 10 weeks after hatch- is the projection vomiting of semi-digested car- ing. Family groups stay together until fall. rion. This deters most attackers (No doubt!). Food: Turkey Vultures prefer to feed on fresh carrion ranging in size from small mammals and dead fish to dead cattle and other grazers. They prefer fresh car- rion and avoid rotting carcasses.
    [Show full text]
  • Background on Sea Turtles
    Background on Sea Turtles Five of the seven species of sea turtles call Virginia waters home between the months of April and November. All five species are listed on the U.S. List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants and classified as either “Threatened” or “Endangered”. It is estimated that anywhere between five and ten thousand sea turtles enter the Chesapeake Bay during the spring and summer months. Of these the most common visitor is the loggerhead followed by the Kemp’s ridley, leatherback and green. The least common of the five species is the hawksbill. The Loggerhead is the largest hard-shelled sea turtle often reaching weights of 1000 lbs. However, the ones typically sighted in Virginia’s waters range in size from 50 to 300 lbs. The diet of the loggerhead is extensive including jellies, sponges, bivalves, gastropods, squid and shrimp. While visiting the Bay waters the loggerhead dines almost exclusively on horseshoe crabs. Virginia is the northern most nesting grounds for the loggerhead. Because the temperature of the nest dictates the sex of the turtle it is often thought that the few nests found in Virginia are producing predominately male offspring. Once the male turtles enter the water they will never return to land in their lifetime. Loggerheads are listed as a “Threatened” species. The Kemp’s ridley sea turtle is the second most frequent visitor in Virginia waters. It is the smallest of the species off Virginia’s coast reaching a maximum weight of just over 100 lbs. The specimens sited in Virginia are often less than 30 lbs.
    [Show full text]
  • COYOTES Animal Damage Control Lakewood, Colorado 80228
    Jeffrey S. Green Assistant Regional Director USDA-APHIS- COYOTES Animal Damage Control Lakewood, Colorado 80228 F. Robert Henderson Extension Specialist Animal Damage Control Kansas State University Manhattan, Kansas 66506-1600 Mark D. Collinge State Director USDA-APHIS- Animal Damage Control Boise, Idaho 83705 Fig. 1. Coyote, Canis latrans Damage Prevention and Shed lambing, kidding, and calving Toxicants usually reduce coyote predation. Control Methods M-44 ejector devices for use with Remove carrion to help limit coyote sodium cyanide-loaded plastic Exclusion populations. capsules. They are most effective Produce livestock in confinement. Frightening Agents and during cold weather (fall to spring). Repellents Herd livestock into pens at night. Livestock protection collars (LPC) Guarding dogs: Some dogs have containing Compound 1080 Exclusion fences (net-wire and/or (sodium monofluoroacetate) are electric), properly constructed and significantly reduced coyote predation. registered for use only in certain maintained, can aid significantly in states. reducing predation. Donkeys and llamas: Some are Fumigants Cultural Methods and aggressive toward canines and have Habitat Modification reduced coyote predation. Gas cartridges are registered as a burrow (den) fumigant. Select pastures that have a lower Sonic and visual repellents: Strobe incidence of predation to reduce lights, sirens, propane cannons, and Trapping exposure of livestock to predation. others have reduced predation on both sheep and calves. Leghold traps (Nos. 3 and 4) are Herding of livestock generally reduces effective and are the most versatile Chemical odor and taste repellents: predation due to human presence control tool. during the herding period. None have shown sufficient effectiveness to be registered for Snares are effective where coyotes pass Change lambing, kidding, and calving use.
    [Show full text]
  • Protophormia Terraenovae (Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830) (Diptera, Calliphoridae) a New Forensic Indicator to South-Western Europe
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Alicante Ciencia Forense, 12/2015: 137–152 ISSN: 1575-6793 PROTOPHORMIA TERRAENOVAE (ROBINEAU-DESVOIDY, 1830) (DIPTERA, CALLIPHORIDAE) A NEW FORENSIC INDICATOR TO SOUTH-WESTERN EUROPE Anabel Martínez-Sánchez1 Concepción Magaña2 Martin Toniolo Paola Gobbi Santos Rojo Abstract: Protophormia terraenovae larvae are found frequently on corpses in central and northern Europe but are scarce in the Mediterranean area. We present the first case in the Iberian Peninsula where P. terraenovae was captured during autopsies in Madrid (Spain). In the corpse other nec- rophagous flies were found, Lucilia sericata, Chrysomya albiceps and Sarcopha- ga argyrostoma. To calculate the posmortem interval, the life cycle of P. ter- raenovae was studied at constant temperature, room laboratory and natural fluctuating conditions. The total developmental time was 16.61±0.09 days, 16.75±4.99 days in the two first cases. In natural conditions, developmental time varied between 31.22±0.07 days (average temperature: 15.6oC), 15.58±0.08 days (average temperature: 21.5oC) and 14.9±0.10 days (average temperature: 23.5oC). Forensic importance and the implications of other necrophagous Diptera presence is also discussed. Key words: Calliphoridae, forensic entomology, accumulated degrees days, fluctuating temperatures, competition, postmortem interval, Spain. Resumen: Las larvas de Protophormia terraenovae se encuentran con frecuen- cia asociadas a cadáveres en el centro y norte de Europa pero son raras en el área Mediterránea. Presentamos el primer caso en la Península Ibérica don- 1 Departamento de Ciencias Ambientales/Instituto Universitario CIBIO-Centro Iberoame- ricano de la Biodiversidad.
    [Show full text]
  • Turtles, All Marine Turtles, Have Been Documented Within the State’S Borders
    Turtle Only four species of turtles, all marine turtles, have been documented within the state’s borders. Terrestrial and freshwater aquatic species of turtles do not occur in Alaska. Marine turtles are occasional visitors to Alaska’s Gulf Coast waters and are considered a natural part of the state’s marine ecosystem. Between 1960 and 2007 there were 19 reports of leatherback sea turtles (Dermochelys coriacea), the world’s largest turtle. There have been 15 reports of Green sea turtles (Chelonia mydas). The other two are extremely rare, there have been three reports of Olive ridley sea turtles (Lepidochelys olivacea) and two reports of loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta). Currently, all four species are listed as threatened or endangered under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. Prior to 1993, Alaska marine turtle sightings were mostly of live leatherback sea turtles; since then most observations have been of green sea turtle carcasses. At present, it is not possible to determine if this change is related to changes in oceanographic conditions, perhaps as the result of global warming, or to changes in the overall population size and distribution of these species. General description: Marine turtles are large, tropical/subtropical, thoroughly aquatic reptiles whose forelimbs or flippers are specially modified for swimming and are considerably larger than their hind limbs. Movements on land are awkward. Except for occasional basking by both sexes and egg-laying by females, turtles rarely come ashore. Turtles are among the longest-lived vertebrates. Although their age is often exaggerated, they probably live 50 to 100 years. Of the five recognized species of marine turtles, four (including the green sea turtle) belong to the family Cheloniidae.
    [Show full text]
  • Mole Crickets Scapteriscus Spp
    Mole Crickets Scapteriscus spp. Southern mole cricket, Scapteriscus borellii Tawny mole cricket, Scapteriscus vicinus DESCRIPTION OF INSECT All stages live in the soil and are rarely see on the surface. Immature stage Nymphs of both species are similar in appearance to adults, but lack wings. Nymphs proceed through 8-10 instars ranging in size from 0.2 to 1.25 inches in length. Each instar is progressively larger with wing buds apparent on later instars. Color varies from gray to brown. Pronotum (large shield behind head) with distinctive mottling or spots, depending on species and location. Mature stage Adults are somewhat cylindrically shaped, light colored crickets 1.26 to 1.38 inches in length. Adults have two pairs of wings, but only fly at night during two brief flight periods in fall and early spring. Spring flights are generally more extensive than fall flights. Damaging stage(s) Both nymphs and adults cause damage Predictive models (degree day, plant phenology, threat temperatures, other) Eggs being to hatch at threat temperatures of 65° F and higher (spring/early summer in most locations). Egg-laying and hatch timing are affected by soil moisture. Threat temperatures can be used to trigger preventive treatments. See the article, “Threat temperatures” for more information. Preventive treatments should be applied prior to egg-hatch (early June) or at the time of peak hatch (last week of June, first week of July in most years and locations). Weekly soap flushes in June and early July is the best method to determine when hatch is occurring, and the best time to treat.
    [Show full text]
  • Blow Fly (Diptera: Calliphoridae) in Thailand: Distribution, Morphological Identification and Medical Importance Appraisals
    International Journal of Parasitology Research ISSN: 0975-3702 & E-ISSN: 0975-9182, Volume 4, Issue 1, 2012, pp.-57-64. Available online at http://www.bioinfo.in/contents.php?id=28. BLOW FLY (DIPTERA: CALLIPHORIDAE) IN THAILAND: DISTRIBUTION, MORPHOLOGICAL IDENTIFICATION AND MEDICAL IMPORTANCE APPRAISALS NOPHAWAN BUNCHU Department of Microbiology and Parasitology and Centre of Excellence in Medical Biotechnology, Faculty of Medical Science, Naresuan University, Muang, Phitsanulok, 65000, Thailand. *Corresponding Author: Email- [email protected] Received: April 03, 2012; Accepted: April 12, 2012 Abstract- The blow fly is considered to be a medically-important insect worldwide. This review is a compilation of the currently known occur- rence of blow fly species in Thailand, the fly’s medical importance and its morphological identification in all stages. So far, the 93 blow fly species identified belong to 9 subfamilies, including Subfamily Ameniinae, Calliphoridae, Luciliinae, Phumosiinae, Polleniinae, Bengaliinae, Auchmeromyiinae, Chrysomyinae and Rhiniinae. There are nine species including Chrysomya megacephala, Chrysomya chani, Chrysomya pinguis, Chrysomya bezziana, Achoetandrus rufifacies, Achoetandrus villeneuvi, Ceylonomyia nigripes, Hemipyrellia ligurriens and Lucilia cuprina, which have been documented already as medically important species in Thailand. According to all cited reports, C. megacephala is the most abundant species. Documents related to morphological identification of all stages of important blow fly species and their medical importance also are summarized, based upon reports from only Thailand. Keywords- Blow fly, Distribution, Identification, Medical Importance, Thailand Citation: Nophawan Bunchu (2012) Blow fly (Diptera: Calliphoridae) in Thailand: Distribution, Morphological Identification and Medical Im- portance Appraisals. International Journal of Parasitology Research, ISSN: 0975-3702 & E-ISSN: 0975-9182, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp.-57-64.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Camouflage' Their Nests but Avoid Them and Create a Decoy Trail
    Buried treasure—marine turtles do not ‘disguise’ or royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rsos ‘camouflage’ their nests but avoid them and create a Research Cite this article: Burns TJ, Thomson RR, McLaren decoy trail RA, Rawlinson J, McMillan E, Davidson H, Kennedy — MW. 2020 Buried treasure marine turtles do not † ‘disguise’ or ‘camouflage’ their nests but avoid Thomas J. Burns , Rory R. Thomson, Rosemary them and create a decoy trail. R. Soc. Open Sci. 7: 200327. A. McLaren, Jack Rawlinson, Euan McMillan, http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.200327 Hannah Davidson and Malcolm W. Kennedy Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, and School of Life Sciences, Graham Kerr Building, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, Received: 27 February 2020 University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK Accepted: 6 April 2020 TJB, 0000-0003-0408-8014; MWK, 0000-0002-0970-5264 After laying their eggs and refilling the egg chamber, sea Subject Category: turtles scatter sand extensively around the nest site. This is presumed to camouflage the nest, or optimize local conditions Organismal and Evolutionary Biology for egg development, but a consensus on its function is Subject Areas: lacking. We quantified activity and mapped the movements of hawksbill (Eretmochelys imbricata) and leatherback (Dermochelys behaviour coriacea) turtles during sand-scattering. For leatherbacks, we also recorded activity at each sand-scattering position. Keywords: For hawksbills, we recorded breathing rates during nesting as hawksbill turtle, Eretmochelys imbricata, leatherback an indicator of metabolic investment and compared with turtle, Dermochelys coriacea, nesting behaviour published values for leatherbacks. Temporal and inferred metabolic investment in sand-scattering was substantial for both species.
    [Show full text]