Drastic Decrease in High Arctic Gulls—Ivory Pagophila Eburnea And
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Polar Biol DOI 10.1007/s00300-016-2027-6 ORIGINAL PAPER Drastic decrease in high Arctic gulls—ivory Pagophila eburnea and Ross’s Rhodostethia rosea—density in the northern Greenland Sea and Fram Strait between 1988 and 2014 Claude R. Joiris1,2 Received: 27 March 2016 / Revised: 26 July 2016 / Accepted: 15 August 2016 Ó Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016 Abstract Our long-term study on top predator (seabirds Keywords Ivory gull Á Ross’s gull Á Sabine’s gull Á and marine mammals) distribution in polar marine Greenland Sea Á Fram Strait ecosystems aims at detecting possible temporal and spatial population changes, especially in the context of global changes in temperature and ice cover. Quantitative data on Introduction the seabird distribution were collected in the northern Greenland Sea and Fram Strait onboard the icebreaker RV The distribution and status of the three Arctic gulls can be Polarstern between 1988 and 2014, applying 30-min summarised as follows (Dement’ev and Gladkov 1969; transect counts from the bridge, without width limitation Meltofte 1972; Blomqvist and Elander 1981; Cramp and (n = 7320). A drastic decrease in numbers by a factor of Simmons 1983; Hjort et al. 1983; Brown 1984; Mehlum seven was detected for the ivory gull Pagophila eburnea 1989; Decker et al. 1998; Kondratyev et al. 2000; Mallen from 2007 on. These data confirm the decrease of ivory Olsen and Larsson 2003). The ivory gull Pagophila ebur- gull previously detected in North Canada and North nea is associated with pack ice in the high Arctic, feeds on Greenland, leading to the conclusion that the species is fish and invertebrates, and scavenges on marine mammal ‘‘endangered’’ or ‘‘near threatened’’. These changes are carcasses killed by polar bears Ursus maritimus, on seals discussed in relation to the decreasing Arctic pack ice Pinnipedia and on bear faeces (Gilchrist et al. 2008; Kar- coverage leading to the opening of the Northwest and novsky et al. 2009; Gilg et al. 2010; Spencer et al. 2014). Northeast Passages in 2007, at the time the year with the Its breeding range includes the Canadian Arctic, North lowest ice coverage ever recorded. On the other hand, the (N) Greenland (Gilchrist et al. 2008) and mainly the Rus- decrease was even stronger for Ross’s gull Rhodostethia sian Arctic from Franz Josef Land to Siberia (Gavrilo rosea after 1993, apparently reflecting changes in migra- 2009), with what seems a breeding hotspot in northeast tory habits. The third high Arctic gull, Sabine’s gull Xema (NE) Greenland (Gilg et al. 2009), apparently bound to the sabini, was only tallied in very low numbers, without any vicinity of the Northeast Water (NEW) polynya. It usually clear temporal evolution in numbers. breeds in colonies, either inland on cliffs and nunataks or on coastal barren islands and lowlands (MacDonald and Macpherson 1962; Gilchrist and Mallory 2005; Gilchrist Electronic supplementary material The online version of this et al. 2008). Rarer breeding sites are on gravel-covered ice article (doi:10.1007/s00300-016-2027-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. floes (Boertmann et al. 2010) and we recently encountered a breeding colony on a gravel-covered iceberg off NE & Claude R. Joiris Greenland, close to the NEW polynya (Nachstheim et al. [email protected] 2015). Important population declines have been detected 1 Laboratory for Polar Ecology (PolE), 1367 Ramillies, during the last decades, mainly in N Canada around the Belgium North Water polynya (Mallory et al. 2003; Chardine et al. 2 Conservation Biology Unit, Royal Belgian Institute for 2004; Gilchrist and Mallory 2005; Gilg et al. 2009; Gaston Natural Sciences, 1000 Brussels, Belgium et al. 2012). This lead to a status of ‘‘endangered’’ species 123 Polar Biol in Canada (COSEWIC 2006) and ‘‘near threatened’’ by the September 2005: 52 individuals, of which 12 were juve- International Union for Conservation of Nature, its global niles, at 78.50°N, 7.30°W. Moreover the gull’s relative population being estimated at between 19,000 and 27,000 density was high as well, the ivory gull being often among individuals (BirdLife International 2015) of which 80 % the three to five most abundant species together with ful- are in Arctic Russia, i.e. 6300–11,500 pairs (Gilchrist et al. mar Fulmarus glacialis, kittiwake Rissa tridactyla and 2008; Gavrilo 2011; Eamer et al. 2013). little auk Alle alle in the eastern part of the area (e.g. Joiris Ross’s gull Rhodostethia rosea breed mainly in the 1992, 1996; Joiris and Tahon 1992; Joiris et al. 1997). deltas of the Kolyma and Khroma rivers, N Siberia, Their numbers obviously decreased during the next period between 142° and 160°E. Many fewer breed in Greenland with a mean of 0.2 per count and a maximum mean value (Egevang and Boertmann 2008). Its world population was of 0.5 per count (n = 4600) (Table 1; Fig. 1), i.e. without estimated to be around 50,000 individuals (between 27,000 overlap of mean values between both periods. Its relative and 100,000). density also strongly decreased, being now no longer rep- Sabine’s gull Xema sabini breed in the same area, resented among the ten most abundant species (Joiris 2011; including Wrangel Island, as well as further East in the N Joiris et al. 2014; Joiris et al. submitted). Bering Sea. Its world population is estimated as a maxi- The Ross’s gull used to be recorded every year until 1993, mum of 100,000 individuals, of which 1000 pairs are in the especially in the NEW polynya area. Its presence reflected a Russian Far East and 100–200 pairs in Greenland. clear seasonal pattern: they were recorded from 15 July on The aim of this article is to report on the status of the (Table 2). A total of 249 individuals were tallied in the first three High Arctic gulls in the N Greenland Sea and Fram period, i.e. a mean value of 0.1 per count—more than 0.6 after Strait with special attention to changes in abundance and/or 15 July. The contrast is striking in comparison to the second distribution during the last decades. period, with only one individual being recorded, while the counting effort was much more significant (Table 1; Fig. 1). The Sabine’s gull was only encountered in very low Materials and methods numbers. Moreover, no clear evolution could be detected, with a mean of 0.01 per count in both periods (Table 1; Data were collected during (strip) transect counts from the Fig. 1). Polarstern bridge in the N Greenland Sea and Fram Strait during summer (June–September). Each count lasted 30 min, without width limitation. Description and com- Discussion ments about the counting method have already been pub- lished (Joiris 2007, 2012; Joiris and Falck 2011; Joiris et al. The decline in ivory gull numbers in the NEW polynya was 2014). In order to allow comparison, the results presented striking, a confirmation of the previously recorded decline in this article were collected by the same team using the in the North Water polynya, Canada (see Introduction). same counting method and same platform. Basic data are The decline might partially have been an old one, since the shown as numbers per count without any correction. The Spitsbergen breeding population showed a strong decrease main Polarstern route consisted of longitudinal transects by more than one order of magnitude between 1930 and between NE Greenland and W Spitsbergen, at 79°N and 1966 (Birkenmajer 1969). This is usually interpreted as a 75°N (see tracks in Online Resource 1). Photos of ivory decline of the whole species, leading to the status of ‘‘en- and Sabine’s gulls are included in Online Resource 2 as an dangered’’ or ‘‘near to threatened’’ species (see Introduc- illustration. tion). The recent major decline was not progressive but a drastic one taking place in 2007, at the time the year with the lowest ice coverage ever recorded and thus corre- Results sponding to the first opening of the Northeast and North- west Passages (Online Resource 3), potentially allowing A synopsis of the data collected in the N Greenland Sea and contacts between populations previously separated by Fram Strait, partim in and close to the pack ice, is presented heavy pack ice. In contrast, densities were very high in the in Table 1. They can be grouped in two periods, from 1988 to Russian Arctic, as confirmed by our own observations. 2005 and from 2007 to 2014, on the basis of obvious changes During a circumpolar navigation in 2008 I tallied mean in density for the most numerous species: ivory gull. ivory gull concentrations off the East Siberian Islands of The ivory gull was present in high numbers during the 4.4 per count, (n = 27) around 77°30 N, 175°E, and of first period with a mean of almost 1.5 individuals per eight per count (n = 13) around 78°N, 100°E (Joiris, 30-min count (n = 2700 counts), all mean values being unpublished), and in 2011 a local mean of one individual above 0.6 per count. Peak value per count was tallied on 7 per count was recorded in the same area (n = 160) (Joiris 123 Polar Biol Table 1 Temporal evolution of high Arctic gull numbers recorded on board RV Polarstern in the northern Greenland Sea and Fram Strait: ivory gull Pagophila eburnea, Ross’s gull Rhodostethia rosea and Sabine’s gull Xema sabini; n = number of 30 min counts; N = total number recorded; mean per count Years Period Expedition Remark Gulls: Ross’s Sabine’s Mean References Ivory nNMean N Mean N 1988 June ARK-V/2 Partim pack ice 274 360 1.31 1 0.0036 2 0.007 Joiris (1992) 1988 July ARK-V/3 Partim pack ice 218 128 0.59 0 3 0.014 Joiris and Tahon (1992) 1991 June–July EPOS II Around Svalbard 377 253 0.67 29 0.077 0 Joiris et al.