Changes in Grouping Patterns of Saiga Antelope in Relation to Intrinsic and Environmental Factors in Mongolia
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln USDA National Wildlife Research Center - Staff U.S. Department of Agriculture: Animal and Publications Plant Health Inspection Service 2013 Changes in grouping patterns of saiga antelope in relation to intrinsic and environmental factors in Mongolia B. B. Buuveibaatar University of Massachusetts, [email protected] T. K. Fuller University of Massachusetts A. E. Fine Wildlife Conservation Society B. Chimeddorj World Wide Fund for Nature J. K. Young Utah State University, [email protected] See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdm_usdanwrc Buuveibaatar, B. B.; Fuller, T. K.; Fine, A. E.; Chimeddorj, B.; Young, J. K.; and Berger, J., "Changes in grouping patterns of saiga antelope in relation to intrinsic and environmental factors in Mongolia" (2013). USDA National Wildlife Research Center - Staff Publications. 1237. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdm_usdanwrc/1237 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Agriculture: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in USDA National Wildlife Research Center - Staff Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Authors B. B. Buuveibaatar, T. K. Fuller, A. E. Fine, B. Chimeddorj, J. K. Young, and J. Berger This article is available at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ icwdm_usdanwrc/1237 bs_bs_bannerJournal of Zoology Journal of Zoology. Print ISSN 0952-8369 Changes in grouping patterns of saiga antelope in relation to intrinsic and environmental factors in Mongolia B. Buuveibaatar1,2, T. K. Fuller1, A. E. Fine2, B. Chimeddorj3, J. K. Young4 & J. Berger5,6 1 Department of Environmental Conservation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA 2 Mongolia Program, Wildlife Conservation Society, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia 3 Mongolia Program Office, World Wide Fund for Nature, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia 4 USDA-WS-National Wildlife Research Center and the Department of Wildland Resources, Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA 5 Organismal Biology and Ecology, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, USA 6 Wildlife Conservation Society, New York, NY, USA Keywords Abstract Saiga tatarica mongolica; social structure; season; group size; Mongolia. Factors that affect group sizes in large ungulates are generally poorly understood for species from remote regions. Understanding grouping patterns is important for Correspondence effective species management, but is lacking for the endangered Mongolian saiga Bayarbaatar Buuveibaatar, Department of (Saiga tatarica mongolica). We studied seasonal changes in the group size and social Environmental Conservation, University of structure of saigas in relation to environmental and anthropogenic factors in Massachusetts, 160 Holdsworth Way, western Mongolia during 2009–2012. To identify group size and composition, we Amherst, MA 01003, USA observed saigas monthly while conducting monitoring surveys, and weekly while Email: [email protected] tracking radio-collared animals. We observed 9268 individuals; median group size was 6.5 (se = 1.7; range = 1–121), and groups of 1–5 animals were most common. Editor: Andrew Kitchener Seasonality exerted strong effects with the smallest groups in June and largest in December. The largest mixed and nursery groups formed during pre-rutting and Received 24 December 2012; revised 26 summer seasons, respectively, but no seasonal differences were detected for bach- March 2013; accepted 5 April 2013 elor groups. The best fitting model, including Normalized Difference Vegetation Index, predation rate and season as covariates, explained ~76% of the variation in doi:10.1111/jzo.12045 monthly ‘typical’ group size. Our results are concordant with studies of other arid-adapted ungulates and suggest vegetation productivity, predation rate and biological cycles are responsible for saiga grouping patterns in Mongolia. Introduction indicators, such as sex ratios, group composition and recruitment rates, are often used to monitor populations Several factors influence grouping patterns of ungulates and (Ginsberg & Milner-Gulland, 1994; Milner-Gulland et al., other social mammals. Grouping is a common response to 2003; Buuveibaatar, 2011). predation, with a primary benefit of reduced risk of an indi- The saiga antelope (Saiga tatarica) is a migratory herding vidual being preyed upon, through increased vigilance (Berger, species of semi-arid ecosystems of Central Asia (Bekenov, 1978; Roberts, 1996; Li et al., 2012). Social structure in ungu- Grachev & Milner-Gulland, 1998). Two subspecies exist, the lates is closely related to ecological factors such as habitat type nominate form (S.t. tatarica) in Russia, Kazakhstan and food availability (Jarman, 1974; Thirgood, 1996). Group and Uzbekistan, and the Mongolian saiga (S.t. mongolica; size tends to increase with population density (Coulson, Kholodova et al., 2006). The Mongolian saiga occurs in four 1993; Borkowski, 2000), but habitat openness may also affect subpopulations (Amgalan, Buuveibaatar & Chimeddorj, grouping patterns (Estes, 1974; Jarman, 1974). Further, 2008) in semi-desert or dry steppe depressions in western grouping behavior is risk sensitive and group size is positively Mongolia (Bannikov, 1954). While the nominate sub- associated with both predation risk and vegetation producti- species undertakes large scale migration tracking greenness of vity (Berger, 1988; Banks, 2001). vegetation (Bekenov, Grachev & Milner-Gulland, 1998; Understanding the interaction between social systems and Singh et al., 2010), the Mongolian subspecies does not show life-history patterns is an essential prerequisite for effective nomadic behavior with pronounced seasonal movements conservation (Festa-Bianchet & Apollonio, 2003); it is the (Bannikov, 1954). Saigas are categorized as critically endan- foundation upon which monitoring schemes, population gered globally (IUCN, 2011); however, Mongolian saigas models and management strategies are built. Because popula- have been assessed as endangered (Clark & Javzansuren, tions of large mammals are strongly structured (Gaillard, 2006). The Mongolian saiga population appears stable in total Festa-Bianchet & Yoccoz, 1998), additional demographic size, probably owing to enhanced protection (Chimeddorj, Journal of Zoology 291 (2013) 51–58 © 2013 The Zoological Society of London 51 Social structure of saigas in Mongolia B. Buuveibaatar et al. Amgalan & Buuveibaatar, 2009), and estimates suggest a saiga group size to vary in accordance with seasonality and life population of 5000–7000 (Lushchekina et al., 1999; Young history traits, such as calving, rutting and migration. et al., 2010). While many aspects of saiga ecology in Mongo- lia, such as habitat requirements and neonate survival, are Material and methods relatively well understood (Berger et al., 2008; Buuveibaatar et al., 2013), little is known about variation in grouping pat- Study area terns and how environmental and human factors may affect them. Monitoring programmes on Mongolian saigas began Our research was conducted in western Mongolia across the in the late 1990s, but efforts were largely confined to winter entire range of Mongolian saigas; we excluded the tiny (Chimeddorj et al., 2009). There is a need for a year-round Mankhan subpopulation as it has only 20–30 animals. Our assessment of grouping patterns to better inform saiga con- dataset covered three main subpopulations of saigas: Shargiin servation actions, especially because anthropogenic threats Gobi, Khuisiin Gobi and Dorgon Plain (Fig. 1). The main are increasing (Lkhagvasuren, Chimeddorj & Sanjmyatav, human populations in the area are concentrated in soums 2012). (villages/towns) and saiga range encompasses eight soum ter- Here, we report seasonal changes in group size and compo- ritories in the Khovd (Darvi and Chandmani soums) and sition of saiga in relation to biotic and abiotic factors. Our Gobi-Altai Aimags (Fig. 1). Semi-nomadic herders are at primary objectives were to determine (1) the extent to which their highest density during autumn within the study area group sizes differed between seasons, and (2) the relative (Buuveibaatar, Young & Fine, 2010). Domestic livestock con- importance of factors contributing to monthly variation in sists primarily of goats and sheep with small numbers of grouping patterns. The logical bases for our expectations are camels and horses. There is a lack of permanent surface water as follows. We expected grouping patterns of saigas to be and local herders rely heavily on hand-drawn wells or snow. positively correlated with vegetation productivity [indexed as The study area is bounded by the Altay Mountains to the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI); Bon et al., west; elevations range from 900 to 4070 m. The region is 1990]. Also, animals in larger groups benefit from the dilution desert-like with a short growing season, long harsh winters effect, as the individual predation risk per attack is reduced as and a strongly variable climate, which governs the availability a function of group size (Hamilton, 1971). Thus, we expected of food plants (Yu et al., 2004). During 1975–2007, average saiga group size would increase during periods when the pre- air temperature during summer and winter was 18 and -20°C, dation rate