DOCSLIB.ORG

Inventory of Fish Species in the Snake River Watershed Within Yellowstone National Park

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Inventory of Fish Species in the Snake River Watershed Within Yellowstone National Park National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Inventory of Fish Species in the Snake River Watershed Within Yellowstone National Park Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/GRYN/NRTR–2008/119 ON THE COVER Upper main stem of the Snake River, Yellowstone National Park. NPS photo. Inventory of Fish Species in the Snake River Watershed Within Yellowstone National Park Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/GRYN/NRTR–2008/119 Authors Daniel L. Mahony Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences Program Yellowstone National Park P.O. Box 168 Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming 82190 Mark A. Novak Bridger-Teton National Forest P.O. Box 1888 Jackson, Wyoming 83001 Todd M. Koel Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences Program Yellowstone National Park P.O. Box 168 Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming 82190 Editing and Design Alice Wondrak Biel Inventory & Monitoring Program National Park Service–Intermountain Region 12795 West Alameda Parkway Denver, Colorado 80225 August 2008 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of inter- est and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientifi c community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to en- sure that the information is scientifi cally credible, technically accurate, appropriately writ- ten for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. The Natural Resource Technical Report series is used to disseminate the peer-reviewed results of scientifi c studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service’s mission. The reports provide contributors with a forum for displaying comprehensive data that are often deleted from journals because of page limitations. Current examples of such reports include the results of research that addresses natural resource management issues; natural resource inventory and monitoring activities; resource assessment reports; scientifi c literature reviews; and peer-reviewed proceedings of technical workshops, conferences, or symposia. Views, statements, fi ndings, conclusions, recommendations, and data in this report are solely those of the author(s) and do not necessarily refl ect views and policies of the U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the National Park Service. Printed copies of reports in this series may be produced in limited quantity, and are only available as long as the supply lasts. You may send a request to: Greater Yellowstone Network 229 AJM Johnson Hall Montana State University Bozeman, Montana 59717 This report is also available electronically from the Greater Yellowstone Network website, http://science.nature.nps.gov/im/units/GRYN/index.cfm, or at http://www.nature.nps.gov/publications/NRPM/index.cfm. When original printed copies are exhausted, copies can be obtained from: Technical Information Center (TIC) Denver Service Center National Park Service P.O. Box 25287 Denver, CO 80225-0287 Please cite this publication as: Mahony, D., M. A. Novak, and T. Koel. 2008. Inventory of fi sh species in the Snake River Watershed within Yellowstone National Park. Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/GRYN/NRTR–2008/119. National Park Service, Fort Collins, Colorado. NPS D-65, August 2008 Contents Figures ...................................................................................................................... iii Tables ..........................................................................................................................v Photos .......................................................................................................................vii Acronyms ...................................................................................................................ix Executive Summary ...................................................................................................xi Acknowledgements ...............................................................................................xiii Chapter 1: Introduction ............................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background and objectives ...................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Study Area ................................................................................................................................. 2 Chapter 2: Methods .................................................................................................. 5 2.1 Fish distribution ........................................................................................................................ 5 2.2 Population characteristics ........................................................................................................ 5 2.3 Classifi cation by spotting pattern ........................................................................................... 5 2.4 Genetic analyses ....................................................................................................................... 6 Chapter 3: Results ..................................................................................................... 7 3.1 Snake River main stem ............................................................................................................. 7 3.2 Forest Creek ............................................................................................................................ 10 3.3 Coulter Creek .......................................................................................................................... 12 3.4 Heart River .............................................................................................................................. 12 3.5 Sickle Creek ............................................................................................................................. 14 3.6 Crooked Creek ........................................................................................................................ 14 3.7 Big Game Creek ...................................................................................................................... 15 3.8 Plateau Creek .......................................................................................................................... 16 3.9 Fox Creek ................................................................................................................................. 16 3.10 Genetic analyses ................................................................................................................... 16 Chapter 4: Discussion .............................................................................................. 19 Chapter 5: Literature Cited ..................................................................................... 21 Appendix A: Photo Sets .......................................................................................... 23 Appendix B: Fish Species Named in This Report ................................................... 33 ii Inventory of Fish Species in the Snake River Watershed within Yellowstone National Park Contents iii Figures Figure 1.2. Snake River basin with main stem river and primary tributaries. .................................... 3 Figure 2.3. Spotting patterns typical of Yellowstone cutthroat trout, Snake River fi ne-spotted cutthroat trout, and indeterminate cutthroat trout............................................................ 6 Figure 3.1-1. Locations where all cutthroat trout were found, and where those classifi ed as the fi ne-spotted form based on spotting patterns were identifi ed in the fi eld. ..................... 7 Figure 3.1-2. Length-frequency distribution of cutthroat trout captured from the main stem of the Snake River in 2004. ....................................................................................................9 Figure 3.1-3. Individual total lengths (mm) of cutthroat trout caught in the Snake River main stem in 2004, grouped by sample reach. .............................................................................. 9 Figure 3.2. Length-frequency distribution of cutthroat trout from Forest Creek. .......................... 10 Figure 3.3-1. Length-frequency distribution of cutthroat trout from Coulter Creek. ..................... 13 Figure 3.3-2. Length-frequency distribution of cutthroat trout from Coulter Creek tributaries. .. 13 Figure 3.4. Length-frequency distribution of cutthroat trout from the Heart River. ...................... 14 Figure 3.5. Length-frequency distribution of cutthroat trout from Sickle Creek. ........................... 15 Figure 3.6. Length-frequency distribution of cutthroat trout from Crooked Creek. ...................... 15 Figure 3.8. Length-frequency distribution of cutthroat trout from Plateau Creek. ........................ 16 Figure 3.9. Length-frequency distribution of cutthroat trout from Fox Creek. ...............................17 Figure 3.10. Location and proportion of cutthroat haplotypes observed in the Snake River watershed, 2004–2005. .......................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lesson 1 the Columbia River, a River of Power
    Lesson 1 The Columbia River, a River of Power Overview RIVER OF POWER BIG IDEA: The Columbia River System was initially changed and engineered for human benefit Disciplinary Core Ideas in the 20th Century, but now balance is being sought between human needs and restoration of habitat. Science 4-ESS3-1 – Obtain and combine Lesson 1 introduces students to the River of Power information to describe that energy curriculum unit and the main ideas that they will investigate and fuels are derived from natural resources and their uses affect the during the eleven lessons that make up the unit. This lesson environment. (Clarification Statement: focuses students on the topics of the Columbia River, dams, Examples of renewable energy and stakeholders. Through an initial brain storming session resources could include wind energy, students record and share their current understanding of the water behind dams, and sunlight; main ideas of the unit. This serves as a pre-unit assessment nonrenewable energy resources are fossil fuels and fissile materials. of their understanding and an opportunity to identify student Examples of environmental effects misconceptions. Students are also introduced to the main could include loss of habitat to dams, ideas of the unit by viewing the DVD selection Rivers to loss of habitat from surface mining, Power. Their understanding of the Columbia River and the and air pollution from burning of fossil fuels.) stakeholders who depend on the river is deepened through the initial reading selection in the student book Voyage to the Social Studies Pacific. Economics 2.4.1 Understands how geography, natural resources, Students set up their science notebook, which they will climate, and available labor use to record ideas and observations throughout the unit.
    [Show full text]
  • Snake River 1157 Wildlife Habitat Information to Inform the Plan- Ton, and Northeast Oregon
    Snake River 1157 wildlife habitat information to inform the plan- ton, and northeast Oregon. +roughout its long ning decisions for renewable energy. history, volcanoes, flooding, and glaciers have Climate change impacts may be felt in the arid shaped the river and its shores. region; nitrogen deposits, atmospheric carbon +e Snake River plain was created by a volca- dioxide, and other changes will impact the grass- nic hotspot beneath Yellowstone National Park, lands. Climate change may impact the size of the which holds the headwaters and origin of the river. sagebrush areas, for example, which in turn con- Flooding as the glaciers retreated after the ice age stricts grouse and other birds and mammals liv- created the current landscape, including eroded ing in these habitats. canyons and valleys. Mountains and plains are typical terrain along the river. +e Snake River has P J. C more than 20 major tributaries, most of them in the mountains; Hells Canyon is the deepest river Further Reading gorge in North America. Cutright, Paul Russell. Lewis and Clark: Pioneering +e Snake River is home to salmon and steel- Naturalists . Lincoln: University of Nebraska head, which were central to the lives of the Nez Press, 2003. Perce and Shoshone, the dominant tribal nations Petersen, Keith C. River of Life, Channel of Death: before the Europeans came. People have lived Fish and Dams on the Lower Snake . Corvallis: along the Snake River for over 15,000 years. +e Oregon State University Press, 2001. Snake River may have been given its name by the Waring, Gwendolyn. L. A Natural History of Shoshones, as a hand signal made by the Shosho- the Intermountain West: Its Ecological and nes representing fish was misinterpreted by Euro- Evolutionary Story.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Snake River Canyon Indicated by Revised Stratigraphy of Snake River Group Near Hagerman and King Hill, Idaho
    History of Snake River Canyon Indicated by Revised Stratigraphy of Snake River Group Near Hagerman and King Hill, Idaho GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 644-F History of Snake River Canyon Indicated by Revised Stratigraphy of Snake River Group Near Hagerman and King Hill, Idaho By HAROLD E. MALDE With a section on PALEOMAGNETISM By ALLAN COX SHORTER CONTRIBUTIONS TO GENERAL GEOLOGY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 644-F Lavaflows and river deposits contemporaneous with entrenchment of the Snake River canyon indicate drainage changes that provide a basis for improved understanding of the late Pleistocene history UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1971 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. A. Radlinski, Acting Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 72-171031 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price 40 cents (paper cover) Stock Number 2401-1128 CONTENTS Page page Abstract ___________________________________________ Fl Late Pleistocene history of Snake River_ _ F9 Introduction.______________________________________ 2 Predecessors of Sand Springs Basalt. 13 Acknowledgments --..______-__-____--__-_---__-_____ 2 Wendell Grade Basalt-________ 14 Age of the McKinney and Wendell Grade Basalts. _____ 2 McKinney Basalt. ____---__---__ 16 Correlation of lava previously called Bancroft Springs Bonneville Flood.________________ 18 Basalt_________________________________________ Conclusion___________________________ 19 Equivalence of pillow lava near Bliss to McKinney Paleomagnetism, by Allan Cox_________ 19 Basalt.._________________________ References cited._____________________ 20 ILLUSTRATIONS Page FIGURE 1. Index map of Idaho showing area discussed.______________________________________________________ F2 2. Chart showing stratigraphy of Snake River Group..____________________________._____--___-_-_-_-.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Plan Amendment No. 30 Clearwater National Forest Latah
    Forest Plan AmendmentNo. 30 Clearwater National Forest Latah County, Idaho The purpose of Amendment No. 30 is to changethe water quality objectives in Appendix K of the Clearwater National Forest Plan for Little Boulder Creek, East Fork Potlatch River, and Ruby Creek, plus, add the Potlatch River. Currently the water quality objective for Little Boulder, East Fork Potlatch and Ruby Creek is "Minimum viable" and the fish speciesis listed as rainbow. Minimum Viable does not support the requirements of the Clean Water Act to provide fishable streams. It only provides a minimal population and does not reflect the listing of the species or importance of the area for spawning. Surveys have documented steelhead in Little Boulder, East Fork Potlatph Riyer, and Ruby Creek. Steelheadwas listed as a Threatened Species within the Snake River in 1997. The Potlatch River, a migratory channel for steelhead,had only been listed in Appendix K as a placeholder to indicate the watershed geography. Stream surveys have shown the river to have a C channel and steelheadas the fish species. Spawning occurs in the East Fork Potlatch, and rearing occurs in most of the tributaries of the Potlatch River. Since the Potlatch River is proposed as critical habitat for steelhead,the water quality objective is being changed from "Minimum Viable" to "High Fish" to follow the direction of the Clean Water Act and Endangered SpeciesAct. Also, as part of the high fish standard, threshold levels of sediment for the Potlatch River should not exceed 10 out of 30 years. Since the proposed changes are not significant, adoption of this amendmentwould not significantly change the forest-wide environmental impacts disclosed in the Clearwater National Forest Plan EIS.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Snake River Dams Stakeholder Engagement Report
    Lower Snake River Dams Stakeholder Engagement Report FINAL DRAFT March 6, 2020 Prepared by: Kramer Consulting Ross Strategic White Bluffs Consulting Contents Executive Summary .......................................................... 1 Opportunities to Increase Understanding .................................... 52 Background and Context ............................................................... 2 Public Comments Related to Agriculture ..................................... 52 Major Findings and Perspectives ................................................... 3 Section 7: Transportation .............................................. 53 Opportunities to Increase Understanding .................................... 12 Context ........................................................................................ 53 Moving Forward ........................................................................... 13 Perspectives ................................................................................ 60 Section 1: Purpose and Scope of Report ..................... 15 Opportunities to Increase Understanding .................................... 62 Background .................................................................................. 15 Public Comments Related to Transportation............................... 62 The Intent of the Report and Engagement Process .................... 15 Section 8: Recreation ..................................................... 64 Methodology................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Wheat Movement on the Columbia River Report Prepared August 17, 2016 All Data Based on Five Year Averages (2011-2015)
    Overview of Wheat Movement on the Columbia River Report Prepared August 17, 2016 All data based on five year averages (2011-2015) The Columbia-Snake River grain handling system includes: o 7 grain export terminals. o 26 up-country grain barge loading terminals along 360 miles of navigable river. o Eight dams that lift a barges a combined 735 feet. o 80 barges controlled by two companies (Shaver and Tidewater). The seven export terminals on the Columbia River annually export 26.5 MMT of grain, including 11.7 MMT of wheat. This makes the Columbia River the third largest grain export corridor in the world behind the Mississippi River and the Parana River in South America. Grain exports from the Columbia River continue to grow each year. Every year approximately 4.0 MMT of wheat, largely Soft White, is shipped down the Columbia River via barge from the states of Oregon, Washington, and Idaho. This is equivalent to: o 34% of all wheat exports from the Columbia River. o 15% of all grain exports from the Columbia River. o 15% of all wheat exported from the United States. o 70% of all wheat exported from the Pacific Northwest. o 50% of all wheat produced in the Pacific Northwest. The wheat moved by barge is largely sourced from the upper river system. o 18% from between Bonneville Dam and McNary Dam. o 36% from between McNary Dam and Lower Monumental Dam. o 46% from between Lower Monumental Dam and Lewiston, Idaho. o 54% of the wheat moved by barge moves through one or more of the four Lower Snake River dams.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geology of Part of the Snake River Canyon and Adjacent Areas in Northeastern Oregon and Western Idaho
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Tracy Lowell Vallier for the Ph.D. in Geology (Name) (Degree) (Major) Date thesis is presented May 1, 1967 Title THE GEOLOGY OF PART OF THE SNAKE RIVER CANYON AND ADJACENT AREAS IN NORTHEAXERN OREGON AND WESTERN IDAHO Abstract approved Redacted for Privacy (Major professor) The mapped area lies between the Wallowa Mountains of northeastern Oregon and the Seven Devils Mountains of western Idaho. Part of the Snake River canyon is in- cluded. A composite stratigraphic section includes at least 30,000 feet of strata. Pre- Tertiary and Tertiary strata are separated by a profound unconformity. Pre -Tertiary layered rocks are mostly Permian and Triassic volcani- clastic and volcanic flow rocks. At least four pre -Ter- tiary intrusive suites occur. Tertiary rocks are Miocene and Pliocene plateau basalts. Quaternary glacial materi- als and stream deposits locally mantle the older rocks. Permian ( ?) rocks of the Windy Ridge Formation are the oldest rocks and consist of 2,000 to 3,000 feet of keratophyre, quartz keratophyre, and keratophric pyro- clastic rocks. Unconformably ( ?) overlying the Windy Ridge Formation are 8,000 to 10,000 feet of volcaniclastic rocks and minor volcanic flow rocks of the Hunsaker Creek Formation of Middle Permian (Leonardian and Wordian) age. Spilitic flow rocks of the Kleinschmidt Volcanics are interlayered with and in part overlie the Hunsaker Creek Formation and comprise a sequence about 2,000 to 3,000 feet thick. The Paleozoic layered rocks were intruded by the Holbrook - Irondyke intrusives, composed of keratophyre porphyry, quartz keratophyre porphyry, diabase, and gab- bro.
    [Show full text]
  • Columbia Snake River System Columbia River Ports
    US Army Corps of Engineers Portland District ColumbiaColumbia SnakeSnake RiverRiver SystemSystem FederalFederal InvestmentInvestment ColumbiaColumbia RiverRiver PortsPorts AA CaseCase StudyStudy ColumbiaColumbia SnakeSnake RiverRiver SystemSystem US Army Corps of Engineers FederalFederal InfrastructureInfrastructure Portland District Columbia & Lower Willamette MCR Jetties & Deep Draft Shipping Channel Entrance Channel Vancouver to The Dalles Barge Channel FederalFederal InfrastructureInfrastructure US Army Corps of Engineers Mouth of the Columbia River Portland District North Jetty – 2.5 mi long (4.02 km) South Jetty – 6.6 mi long (10.62 km) Spur Jetty – 0.3 mi long (0.48 km) Entrance Channel – 2600 ft x 55 ft deep (792 m x 16.8 m) Annual Maintenance Dredging: 4.5 Mcy (3.5 hm3) FederalFederal InfrastructureInfrastructure US Army Corps of Engineers PortlandColumbia District & Lower Willamette River Channel 40 foot (12.2 m) x 600 feet (183 m) wide Mouth to Portland & Vancouver - 106 mi (107 km) Willamette River - 10 mi (16 km) Annual Maintenance Dredging -6 Mcy (4.6 hm3) Presently deepening to 43 feet (13.1 km) FederalFederal InfrastructureInfrastructure US Army Corps of Engineers Portland District Columbia & Snake RiverRiver BargeBarge ChannelChannel 359 miles (578 km) from Vancouver, WA to Lewiston, ID 8 locks -14 foot (4.6 m) sill depth; 86 ft x 650 ft (26.2 m x 198.1 m Annual Dredging 200 kcy (15.3 dam3) FederalFederal InfrastructureInfrastructure US Army Corps of Engineers Portland District 8 Locks through Multipurpose Dams 700 ft Vertical Lift (214 m) ColumbiaColumbia SnakeSnake RiverRiver DamsDams US Army Corps of Engineers 88 MultipurposeMultipurpose ProjectsProjects Portland District Power –Generation Cap. 10.3 MWatt Navigation – 359 mi of barge channel Flood Control - 534,000 AF Irrigation –6.5 MAc land (26,304 km2) Recreation – Over 100 Camps, Parks & Recreational Facilities Environmental – Fish Passage Facilities US Army Corps SelectedSelected CommoditiesCommodities of Engineers Portland District ForecastForecast vs.vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Snake River Through Jackson Hole Snake River Management Plan
    Snake River through Jackson Hole Snake River Management Plan Prepared by Doug Whittaker, Bo Shelby, and Dan Shelby Confluence Research and Consulting Prepared for Teton County, Wyoming 2018 Revision Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................... 1 2. PLANNING PROCESS ........................................................................................................................................................ 3 3. PLAN OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................................................................ 6 4. RECREATION AND RESOURCE VALUES ............................................................................................................................. 7 Moose to Wilson .......................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Wilson to South Park ................................................................................................................................................................... 9 South Park to Hoback................................................................................................................................................................. 11 5. ISSUES ..........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mormon Settlement of Snake River Fork Country, 1883-1893
    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Theses and Dissertations 1950 Mormon Settlement of Snake River Fork Country, 1883-1893 Norman Earl Ricks Brigham Young University - Provo Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd Part of the History Commons, and the Mormon Studies Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Ricks, Norman Earl, "Mormon Settlement of Snake River Fork Country, 1883-1893" (1950). Theses and Dissertations. 5074. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/5074 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. MORMON settlement OF SNAKE RIVER FORK COUNTRY 188318931883 1893 A TIMSISTHESIS SUBMITTED TO THE department OF HISTORY BRIGHAM YOUNG university in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree master of science by norman earl ricks 190igo1950 acknowledgeacknowledgmacknowledgments7eaeits this study has been done under the careful guidance of the history and political science department of brigham young university dr russell B swensen gave valuable aid in the mechanics sources and standards of historiography special help was rendered by dr brigham D madsen and dr richard D poll in research seminars professor william C carroarroarngarr contrib- uted timely advise on sentence structure and encouraged the political development the latter three as committee members
    [Show full text]
  • Brigham Young University
    GENETIC CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT OF YELLOWSTONE CUTTHROAT TROUT (ONCORHYNCHUS CLARKII BOUVIERI) IN YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK by David Joel Janetski A thesis submitted to the faculty of Brigham Young University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Department of Integrative Biology Brigham Young University December 2006 BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY GRADUATE COMMITTEE APPROVAL of a thesis submitted by David Joel Janetski This thesis has been read by each member of the following graduate committee and by majority vote has been found to be satisfactory. ______________________ _____________________________________ Date Dennis K. Shiozawa, Chair ______________________ _____________________________________ Date R. Paul Evans ______________________ _____________________________________ Date Jerald B. Johnson ______________________ _____________________________________ Date Keith A. Crandall ii BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY As chair of the candidate’s graduate committee, I have read the thesis of David Joel Janetski in its final form and have found that (1) its format, citations, and bibliographical style are consistent and acceptable and fulfill university and department style requirements; (2) its illustrative materials including figures, tables, and charts are in place; and (3) the final manuscript is satisfactory to the graduate committee and is ready for submission to the university library. ________________________ _____________________________________ Date Dennis K. Shiozawa Chair,
    [Show full text]
  • Gaging-Station Records in the Missouri River Basin
    Gaging-Station Records in the Missouri River Basin By B. R. COLBY and R. E. OLTMAN * GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1077 An index and summary giving kinds of records, published sources, and explanation of data PROPEBTt * offc-V B^ PHVATI s. i,», v«r. 9.» UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR J. A. Krug, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1948 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. CONTENTS Page Introduction............................................. 1 Sources of gaging-station data........................... 2 Gaging-station names..................................... 2 Map showing gaging stations.............................. 3 Bar charts of records.................................... 4 Summary of records by basins......................... 17 Base data for gaging stations............................ 19 Drainage areas....................................... 19 Approximate areas irrigated.......................... 20 Approximate usable capacity of reservoirs............ 21 Average discharge for water years 1938-43............ 22 Average runoff for water years 1938-43............... 24 Sources of records................................... 25 Period of discharge record........................... 25 Maximum discharge.................................... 25 Minimum discharge.................................... 26 Annual discharge records.............................. 26 Average discharge...................................
    [Show full text]