DOCSLIB.ORG

090525 Final Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
090525 Final Report LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL Standing Committee on Law and Justice Legislation on altruistic surrogacy in NSW Ordered to be printed 27 May 2009 according to Standing Order 231 Report 38 - May 2009 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL Legislation on altruistic surrogacy in NSW New South Wales Parliamentary Library cataloguing-in-publication data: New South Wales. Parliament. Legislative Council. Standing Committee on Law and Justice. Legislation on altruistic surrogacy in NSW : [report] / Standing Committee on Law and Justice. [Sydney, N.S.W.] : the Committee, 2009. – xix – 173 p. ; 30 cm. (Report ; no. 38) Chair: Christine Robertson, MLC. “May 2009”. ISBN 9781921286391 1. Surrogate mothers—New South Wales. I. Title II. Robertson, Christine. III. Series: New South Wales. Parliament. Legislative Council. Standing Committee on Law and Justice. Report ; no. 38 306.8743 (DDC22) ii Report 38 - May 2009 STANDING COMMITTEE ON LAW AND JUSTICE How to contact the Committee Members of the Standing Committee on Law and Justice can be contacted through the Committee Secretariat. Written correspondence and enquiries should be directed to: The Director Standing Committee on Law and Justice Legislative Council Parliament House, Macquarie Street Sydney New South Wales 2000 Internet www.parliament.nsw.gov.au Email [email protected] Telephone 02 9230 3534 Facsimile 02 9230 3416 Report 38 - May 2009 iii LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL Legislation on altruistic surrogacy in NSW Terms of reference That the Standing Committee on Law and Justice inquire into and report on whether NSW legislation requires amendment to better deal with altruistic surrogacy and related matters and in particular: a. The role, if any, that the NSW Government should play in regulating altruistic surrogacy arrangements in NSW b. The criteria, if any, that the intended parent/s and/or birth parent/s should have to meet before entering into an altruistic surrogacy arrangement c. The legal rights and responsibilities that should be imposed upon the intended parent/s and/or birth parent/s d. The role that a genetic relationship between the child and the intended parent/s and/or birth parent/s should play in any altruistic surrogacy arrangement e. The legislative amendments that should be made to clarify the legal status of any child born of such an arrangement f. The rights that a child born through an altruistic surrogacy arrangement should have to access information relating to his or her genetic parentage, and who should hold this information g. The efficacy of surrogacy legislation in other jurisdictions and the possibility and desirability of working towards national consistency in legislation dealing with surrogacy h. The interplay between existing State and Federal legislation as it affects all individuals involved in, and affected by, surrogacy i. Any other relevant matter.1 1 LC Minutes No 63, 28 August 2008, Item 26, p 749 iv Report 38 - May 2009 STANDING COMMITTEE ON LAW AND JUSTICE Committee membership The Hon Christine Robertson MLC Australian Labor Party Chair The Hon David Clarke MLC Liberal Party Deputy Chair The Hon John Ajaka MLC Liberal Party The Hon Greg Donnelly MLC Australian Labor Party The Hon Amanda Fazio MLC Australian Labor Party Ms Sylvia Hale MLC The Greens Committee Secretariat Ms Rachel Callinan, Director Ms Merrin Thompson, A/Director Mr Jonathan Clark, Principal Council Officer Ms Christine Nguyen, Assistant Council Officer Report 38 - May 2009 v LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL Legislation on altruistic surrogacy in NSW Table of contents Chair’s foreword x Executive summary xi Summary of recommendations xvii Acronyms xix Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Inquiry terms of reference 1 Conduct of the inquiry 1 Submissions 1 Public hearings 1 Report structure 2 Chapter 2 Background 3 Definition and terminology 3 Key issues in surrogacy 4 The beliefs and attitudes around surrogacy 4 Eligibility criteria 4 Access and approval processes 4 Enforceability of surrogacy agreements 4 Transferral of parentage 5 Access to genetic information 5 Advertising and brokerage 5 Residency 5 Australian jurisdictions 5 Australian Standing Committee of Attorneys-General discussion paper 6 Current situation in Australian states and territories 9 New South Wales 9 Australian Capital Territory 10 Queensland 11 Victoria 12 South Australia 13 Tasmania 14 Western Australia 15 Northern Territory 16 Overseas jurisdictions 16 New Zealand 16 United Kingdom 17 Canada 18 vi Report 38 - May 2009 STANDING COMMITTEE ON LAW AND JUSTICE United States 19 Israel 22 Chapter 3 Beliefs and attitudes about the practice of surrogacy 23 Views on principle 23 Social construct of motherhood, fatherhood and family 25 Commodification of children and the right to have a child 27 The rights and best interests of the child 29 United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child 29 Asserting the rights of the child pre-conception versus post-birth 31 Issues relating to the wellbeing of children born through surrogacy arrangements 35 Breaking the child’s bond with the birth mother 35 Being raised by ‘non-biological’ parents 36 Complex family structures and ‘genealogical bewilderment’ 39 Health risks through the use of ART 41 Surrogacy as social experimentation 42 Issues relating to the birth mother 43 The birth mother’s motivation 43 Ability to give informed consent 44 Failure to relinquish 45 Psychological damage to the birth mother and her family 46 Issues relating to the intending parents 48 Committee comment 48 Chapter 4 The role for the NSW Government in regulating altruistic surrogacy 51 Incidence of altruistic surrogacy arrangements in NSW 51 The role of the state in people’s private lives 52 The possible effect of regulation 53 The extent of regulation required 54 The interplay between state and federal legislation in relation to surrogacy arrangements 57 Existing guidelines and policies relating to altruistic surrogacy 58 The adequacy of existing guidelines and policies 62 Uniform national legislation 65 Report 38 - May 2009 vii LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL Legislation on altruistic surrogacy in NSW Committee comment 66 Chapter 5 Criteria for intending parents and birth mothers 69 Criteria applying to all parties 69 Counselling 69 Legal advice 76 Relationship between birth mother and intending parents 78 Criminal record check 80 Requirement to use ART through a registered clinic 81 Criteria applying to intending parents 82 Infertility 82 Age and duration of relationship 84 The intending parents’ genetic connection to the child 84 Access for same-sex couples, unmarried couples and single people 86 Committee comment 88 Criteria applying to the birth mother 89 Age 89 Previous children 90 The birth mother’s genetic connection to the child (gestational surrogacy Vs traditional surrogacy) 91 Committee comment 92 Chapter 6 Legal rights and responsibilities 95 Surrogacy agreements 95 Unenforceability 95 Approval by a regulatory body 97 Rights of parties during the pregnancy and birth 99 Advertising and brokerage services 99 Committee comment 100 Reimbursement of expenses to the birth mother 101 Commercial surrogacy 102 Defining ‘reasonable expenses’ 103 Committee comment 106 Parentage presumptions and the transferral of parentage 107 Current situation in NSW 107 Parenting orders 108 Adoption 109 A transferral of parentage mechanism specifically for surrogacy arrangements 115 Committee comment 118 Genetic information and the format of birth certificates 121 The importance of knowing genetic origins 122 Storing genetic information 122 Information recorded on birth certificates 123 viii Report 38 - May 2009 STANDING COMMITTEE ON LAW AND JUSTICE Committee comment 124 Conscientious objection 126 Committee comment 127 Appendix 1 Submissions 129 Appendix 2 Witnesses at hearings 131 Appendix 3 Tabled documents 133 Appendix 4 Minutes 135 Appendix 5 Dissenting statements 169 Report 38 - May 2009 ix LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL Legislation on altruistic surrogacy in NSW Chair’s foreword The practice of surrogacy, altruistic or commercial, is a contentious and divisive issue, one that gives rise to diverse and often irreconcilable views. Furthermore, these views are typically grounded in deeply held convictions about reproduction and family formation, and religious and ethical standpoints. I would like, at the outset, to acknowledge this diversity of views and the fact that the Committee itself is divided with regard to the views of its members. In relation to regulation of the practice of altruistic surrogacy in NSW, it is unfortunately the case that whatever position the Government takes will be unpopular with some parties. Currently, there is very limited regulation of the practice of altruistic surrogacy in NSW. The regulations that are either directly or indirectly related to surrogacy are contained in separate pieces of legislation, including the Assisted Reproductive Technology Act 2007 (NSW), the Status of Children Act 1996 (NSW), and the Adoption Act 2000 (NSW). In addition, the National Health and Medical Research Council issues guidelines for artificial reproductive technology clinics, and individual clinics can develop their own internal guidelines applicable to surrogacy arrangements. There was consensus amongst inquiry participants and the Committee that the best interests of the child were the paramount consideration in relation to the practice of surrogacy. In this respect, the Committee came to the view that its primary obligation is to protect the best interests of children who are born through surrogacy arrangements by removing, where possible,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Surrogacy and Human Rights in New Zealand
    Rethinking Surrogacy Laws Te Kohuki Ture Kopu Whangai Surrogacy and Human Rights in New Zealand Rhonda Powell and Natalie Baird May 2020 CONTENTS CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................................ i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................................................................. ii TABLE OF ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................................ iii PART ONE: INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 Rethinking Surrogacy Laws / Te Kohuki Ture Kopu Whangai ............................................................. 1 Surrogacy and Human Rights .............................................................................................................. 2 The Core Human Rights at Stake ........................................................................................................ 2 Dealing with Conflicts between Rights in the Surrogacy Context ...................................................... 3 Future Law Reform ............................................................................................................................. 4 PART TWO: RIGHTS OF THE SURROGATE ............................................................................................... 5 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Illegale Märkte: Stand Der Sozialwissenschaftlichen Forschung
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Wehinger, Frank Working Paper Illegale Märkte: Stand der sozialwissenschaftlichen Forschung MPIfG Working Paper, No. 11/6 Provided in Cooperation with: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies (MPIfG), Cologne Suggested Citation: Wehinger, Frank (2011) : Illegale Märkte: Stand der sozialwissenschaftlichen Forschung, MPIfG Working Paper, No. 11/6, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/50554 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu MPIfG Working Paper 11/6 Forschungsbericht aus dem MPIfG Frank Wehinger Illegale Märkte Stand der sozialwissenschaftlichen Forschung MPIfG Working Paper Frank Wehinger Illegale Märkte: Stand der sozialwissenschaftlichen Forschung MPIfG Working Paper 11 /6.
    [Show full text]
  • Feminist Engagements in Aotearoa: 125 Years of Suffrage and Beyond
    Women’s Studies Association/Pae Akoranga Wahine and the Stout Research Centre for New Zealand Studies, Victoria University of Wellington Feminist Engagements in Aotearoa: 125 years of Suffrage and Beyond 21-23rd September 2018 Victoria University of Wellington, Rutherford House, Pipitea Campus, Wellington 1 3 September 2018 2 3 September 2018 Welcome Women’s Studies Association of New Zealand (WSANZ) Nau mai, haere mai ki Whanganui-a-Tara. Welcome to Wellington and to the 40th anniversary conference of the Women’s Studies Association NZ/ Pae Akoranga Wāhine. We are pleased to be holding this conference at Victoria University of Wellington/ Te Whare Wānanga o te Ūpoko o te Ika a Māui and to have the Stout Research Centre for New Zealand Studies as our co-hosts. The timing, to coincide with the 125th anniversary of women’s suffrage in New Zealand, is particularly auspicious. The Convenors and Conference Committee have worked hard to put together a stimulating programme and associated events and we hope that you find it enriching, thought-provoking and empowering. We encourage you to enjoy the conference and to look beyond to the many suffrage-related commemorative exhibitions and events that the city has to offer. We are particularly grateful the Ministry of Culture and Heritage, the National Library and the Chinese Poll Tax Fund, among others, for sponsoring aspects of the conference. Nga mihi, Hilary Lapsley, Convenor, WSANZ/PAW. Convenors Ann Weatherall and Kate Hunter 3 3 September 2018 4 3 September 2018 Conference Timetable Friday 21 September 2018 4.00pm - 5.00pm He Tohu Exhibition - Hosted by the National Library of New Zealand/Te Puna Matauranga o Aotearoa, Molesworth Street.
    [Show full text]
  • Adoption: Options for Reform
    Preliminary Paper 38 A DOPTION: OPTIONS FOR REFORM A discussion paper The Law Commission welcomes comments on this paper and seeks responses to the questions raised. These should be forwarded to: Helen Colebrook, Researcher, Law Commission PO Box 2590, DX SP 23534, Wellington by 31 January 2000 October 1999 Wellington, New Zealand The Law Commission is an independent, publicly funded, central advisory body established by statute to undertake the systematic review, reform and development of the law of New Zealand. Its purpose is to help achieve law that is just, principled, and accessible, and that reflects the heritage and aspirations of the peoples of New Zealand. The Commissioners are: Hon Justice David Baragwanath – President Paul Heath QC Judge Margaret Lee DF Dugdale Denese Henare ONZM Timothy Brewer ED The office of the Law Commission is at 89 The Terrace, Wellington Postal address: PO Box 2590, Wellington 6001, New Zealand Document Exchange Number: SP23534 Telephone: (04) 473–3453, Facsimile: (04) 471–0959 Email: [email protected] Internet: www.lawcom.govt.nz Use of submissions The Law Commission’s processes are essentially public, and it is subject to the Official Information Act 1982. Thus copies of submissions made to the Commission will normally be made available on request, and the Commission may mention submissions in its reports. Any request for the withholding of information on the grounds of confidentiality or for any other reason will be determined in accordance with the Official Information Act 1982. Preliminary Paper/Law
    [Show full text]
  • Law Commission
    Hōngongoi | July 2021 @njesseApter aM, Te Whanganui-a-Tara, Aotearoa Wellington, New Zealand He Puka Kaupapa | Issues Paper 47 Te Kōpū Whāngai: He Arotake Review of Surrogacy Te Aka Matua o te Ture | Law Commission is an independent, publicly funded, central advisory body established by statute to undertake the systematic review, reform and development of the law of Aotearoa New Zealand. Its purpose is to help achieve law that is just, principled and accessible and that reflects the values and aspirations of the people of Aotearoa New Zealand. Te Aka Matua in the Commission’s Māori name refers to the parent vine that Tāwhaki used to climb up to the heavens. At the foot of the ascent, he and his brother Karihi find their grandmother Whaitiri, who guards the vines that form the pathway into the sky. Karihi tries to climb the vines first but makes the error of climbing up the aka taepa or hanging vine. He is blown violently around by the winds of heaven and falls to his death. Following Whaitiri’s advice, Tāwhaki climbs the aka matua or parent vine, reaches the heavens and receives the three baskets of knowledge. Kia whanake ngā ture o Aotearoa mā te arotake motuhake Better law for Aotearoa New Zealand through independent review The Commissioners are: Amokura Kawharu – Tumu Whakarae | President Helen McQueen – Tumu Whakarae Tuarua | Deputy President Donna Buckingham – Kaikōmihana | Commissioner Te Aka Matua o te Ture | Law Commission is located at: Level 9, Solnet House, 70 The Terrace, Wellington 6011 Postal address: PO Box 2590, Wellington 6140, Aotearoa New Zealand Document Exchange Number: SP 23534 Telephone: 04 473 3453 Email: [email protected] Internet: www.lawcom.govt.nz The Māori language version of this Issues Paper’s title was developed for Te Aka Matua o te Ture | Law Commission by Kiwa Hammond and Maakere Edwards of Aatea Solutions Limited.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical Analysis of the Transferral of Legal
    THREE-WAY PARENTING? A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE TRANSFERAL OF LEGAL PARENTAGE IN SURROGACY ARRANGEMENTS IN NEW ZEALAND Esmee Powell A dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Bachelor of Laws (Honours) at the University of Otago – Te Whare Wānanga o Otāgo 2 October 2020 1 Acknowledgements Firstly, to my supervisor Nicki Taylor, whose guidance, wisdom and friendship has been invaluable. I am so appreciative of all of your support. To my mum and dad, for being the most supportive and inspiring parents I could hope for, and for always reminding me how proud they are. To my sister Eva, for being my best friend. And to my flatmates, friends, and Charlie, for your endless encouragement and for always making me laugh. Thank you all! 2 Table of Contents Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 5 Part I – New Zealand’s Current Approach to Surrogacy Arrangements ................................... 9 Chapter One – Current Law and Practice in New Zealand ................................................ 9 I. Surrogacy Regulation .................................................................................................... 9 A. The Status of Children Act 1969 and the Care of Children Act 2004 ...................... 9 B. ECART and ACART ............................................................................................... 10 C. The HART Act 2004 ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Natalie Baird*
    Commercial Surrogacy and the Sale of Children: A Call to Action for the Committee on the Rights of the Child 6 COMMERCIAL SURROGACY AND THE SALE OF CHILDREN: A CALL TO ACTION FOR THE COMMITTEE ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD Natalie Baird* I. Introduction One of the many unsettled issues in relation to commercial surrogacy is whether a commercial surrogacy arrangement amounts to an unlawful sale of children in breach of article 35 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC)1 and the Optional Protocol on the Sale of Children, Child Prostitution and Child Pornography (CRC-OPSC).2 For the purposes of this chapter, commercial surrogacy is understood as an arrangement where the surrogate is not only compensated for her expenses, but also receives a sum of money in addition to her reimbursable expenses. Some commentators assert that commercial surrogacy per se amounts to unlawful sale of children, while others argue that commercial surrogacy simply involves remuneration to the surrogate for her reproductive services rather than payment for a child. Many commentators agree that there is a need for regulation, whether it be at the national or international level. For some of those commentators who are of the view that commercial surrogacy per se amounts to the unlawful sale of children, then international regulation of the same is seen as largely redundant as it is already fully regulated by the prohibition in the CRC and CRC-OPSC.3 This chapter examines the tentative engagement of the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child on this issue.
    [Show full text]
  • INTERNATIONAL SURROGACY FORUM 2019 27-28 June 2019 University of Cambridge, England, United Kingdom
    INTERNATIONAL SURROGACY FORUM 2019 27-28 June 2019 University of Cambridge, England, United Kingdom INTRODUCTION The International Surrogacy Forum 2019, organized by Cambridge Family Law, University of Cambridge, together with the International Academy of Family Lawyers (IAFL) and the American Bar Association (ABA) Section of Family Law, explored a range of issues and challenges surrounding the law and practice of national and international surrogacy from a practical perspective. Practitioners, lawmakers, academics, and individual participants in the surrogacy process came together to discuss the legal consequences of the rise in international surrogacy arrangements (ISAs) and, in particular, reproductive tourism. The Forum was structured to provide academic analysis, practical expertise, and lived experiences from individuals involved with ISAs in various legal systems around the world. Invited to the Forum were academics, practitioners, government actors, NGO representatives, participants in surrogacy (intended parents and surrogates alike), and children born through surrogacy. Invitations were extended to prospective delegates across a broad spectrum: those with known positions on surrogacy generally, both supportive and in opposition, and those who did not have a clear position on surrogacy. The unifying factor among all the invitees was a significant interest in surrogacy, whether that interest was professional, academic, regulatory, or personal. The final delegate list included approximately 150 participants from over 25 countries
    [Show full text]
  • Responding to the Practice of International Surrogacy
    CONTRACTING THE NEW DELHI BELLY: Responding to the Practice of International Surrogacy Annika Tombleson A dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of a Bachelor of Laws (Honours) degree. Faculty of Law University of Otago October 2012 Acknowledgements To my supervisor, Mark Henaghan, thank you for your invaluable advice, encouragement and guidance. Your enthusiasm and passion for law was inspirational. To the library staff, thank you for always lending a helping hand. To Alice Garner, thank you for your friendship and support, it has made this journey so much easier. And to my flatmates and friends, thank you for providing me with laughter and encouragement throughout this year. Lastly but most importantly, to my Mum and Dad, thank you for your unwavering support, encouragement and proof reading expertise. i Table of Contents Acknowledgements ..................................................................................................................... i Table of Contents ....................................................................................................................... ii Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1 Chapter One: International Surrogacy ....................................................................................... 4 I. Understanding Surrogacy ............................................................................................... 4 II. An Indian Case Study ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Changes to the Human Assisted Reproductive Technology Act (2004)
    34 DIALOGUE: Proposed changes to the Human Assisted Reproductive Technology Act (2004) DIANNE YATES, RHONDA SHAW, GEORGE PARKER, LIEZL VAN ZYL and RUTH WALKER Introductory remarks DIANNE YATES, FORMER LABOUR MP In Marge Piercy’s novel Women on the edge of time, she portrays a world where each child has five parents. The reason for this is that she regards child rearing as such a complex and demanding role that it needs to be shared by a group with multiple talents and skills. Piercy was concerned about the physical, intellectual and emotional development of a child. Some time ago, when I was employed by the Centre for Continuing Education at the University of Waikato, I attended a public lecture by Dr Fisher of Fertility Associates. In this lecture, he described how a child could have five physical and legal parents: An egg donor, a sperm donor, a gestational mother, and social or contracting mothers and fathers. At that time there was considerable discussion about the Baby M case in the United States (where a contracting gestational mother did not wish to hand over the child to contracting parents after the birth) and Geoffrey Palmer (now Sir) introduced a bill into Parliament to ensure, as a result of this case, that the gestational or birth mother of a child born in New Zealand was the legal mother. One of the outcomes of the Fisher lecture was that I saw the need for further legislation in New Zealand to protect the rights of all parties involved in new and emerging ‘birth technologies’ – to try to get the best possible outcomes for all parties, particularly the child, who is unable to speak for him or herself.
    [Show full text]
  • Who's Bringing up Baby
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ResearchArchive at Victoria University of Wellington KATE HENDERSON WHO’S BRINGING UP BABY: DEVELOPING A FRAMEWORK FOR THE TRANSFER OF LEGAL PARENTHOOD IN SURROGACY ARRANGEMENTS LLM RESEARCH PAPER LAWS 513: LAW AND MEDICINE FACULTY OF LAW 2013 2 Abstract Surrogacy arrangements defy traditional definitions of parenthood and pose challenges in determining who should be recognised as legal parents. This is exacerbated by the use of assisted reproductive techniques which allow for the separation of genetic, gestational and intentional parenthood, creating questions about the comparative value of these contributions. This paper identifies that New Zealand legislation dealing with parentage in surrogacy, primarily the Adoption Act 1955 and the Status of Children Act 1969, never contemplated surrogacy arrangements and requires strained interpretation to avoid perverse results. The paper critiques two proposals for reform: the Law Commission’s recommendations in the 2005 New Issues in Legal Parenthood Report, and the framework suggested in the Care of Children (Adoption and Surrogacy Law Reform) Amendment Bill. This paper concludes that the proposed Amendment Bill shows promise, however should incorporate the Law Commission’s 2005 recommendations to provide a truly comprehensive framework. This framework should focus on giving effect to the intentions of parties to a surrogacy arrangement, while ensuring the interests of the surrogate are protected and the arrangement is carried out in accordance with recognised ethical principles. It is additionally important that children have an opportunity to know their genetic and/or biological background. Word Count: The text of this paper (excluding cover page, abstract, table of contents, non-substantive footnotes, appendix and bibliography) comprises approximately 15,149 words.
    [Show full text]
  • New Issues in Legal Parenthood / Law Commission
    E 3188 Report 88 New Issues in L egal Parenthood April 2005 Wellington, New Zealand The Law Commission is an independent, publicly funded, central advisory body established by statute to undertake the systematic review, reform and development of the law of New Zealand. Its purpose is to help achieve law that is just, principled, and accessible, and that reflects the heritage and aspirations of the peoples of New Zealand. The Commissioners are: The Honourable Justice J Bruce Robertson – President Richard Clarke QC Honourable Justice Eddie Durie Frances Joychild Professor Ngatata Love QSO JP Dr Warren Young Helen Aikman (Senior Consultant) Neville Trendle (Senior Consultant) The Executive Manager of the Law Commission is Bala Benjamin The office of the Law Commission is at 89 The Terrace, Wellington Postal address: PO Box 2590, Wellington 6001, New Zealand Document Exchange Number: SP 23534 Telephone: (04) 473–3453, Facsimile: (04) 471–0959 Email: [email protected] Internet: www.lawcom.govt.nz National Library of New Zealand Cataloguing-in-Publication Data New Zealand. Law Commission. New issues in legal parenthood / Law Commission. (New Zealand. Law Commission. Report) Includes index. ISBN 1-877316-07-5 1. Parents—Legal status, laws, etc.—New Zealand. 2. Parent and child (Law)—New Zealand. 3. Parenthood. I. Title. II. Series. 346.93017—dc 22 Report/Law Commission, Wellington, 2005 ISSN 0113–22334 ISBN 1–877316–07–5 This report may be cited as: NZLC R88 Also published as Parliamentary Paper E3188 This report is also available on the Internet
    [Show full text]