Download Download

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Volume 16 – Issue 1 – February 2020 FOCUS ON Family wellbeing Engaging Children and Young People in the Policy Process: Realising treaty-based protection in Aotearoa’s lessons learned from the development of the Child child welfare system – Claire Achmad 40 and Youth Wellbeing Strategy – Kelsey Brown, Luke Fitzmaurice, Kiri Milne and Donna Provoost 3 Enhancing long-term governance – Parliament’s vital Supporting Child Wellbeing: a health assessment oversight role tool for the Hamilton Children’s Team – Jonathan Boston, David Bagnall – Polly Atatoa Carr, Sneha Sadani, Jesse Whitehead, and Anna Barry 43 Deanne McManus-Emery, Tanya Parsonson and Jolanda Roe 10 Catastrophic Risk from Rapid Developments in Artificial Should Surrogate Pregnancy Arrangements be Enforceable Intelligence: what is yet to be addressed and how might in Aotearoa New Zealand? – Rhonda M. Shaw 18 New Zealand policymakers respond? – Matt Boyd and Nick Wilson Lessons from Child Welfare: why accountability 53 to ministers cannot meet the needs of public Sea Level Rise and Local Government: policy gaps legitimacy. – Len Cook 26 and opportunities – Vanessa James, Catherine Iorns and Patrick Gerard Four essays on the child welfare system 62 Child protection, capitalism and the settler state: Valuing Impacts – the contribution of CBAx to rethinking the social contract – Ian Hyslop 34 improved policy practices – Kirsten Jensen and The case for an inequalities perspective in Christopher Thompson 67 child protection – Emily Keddell 36 Towards a New Public Ethics Child welfare: a perfect storm? – Michael Macaulay 77 – David Hanna 39 Editorial In October 2017, the Labour party formed a coalition surrogate or egg donors. On the one hand, legislation government with a mandate to address child poverty should protect both the surrogates and future and with aspirations to make New Zealand the best parents in a surrogacy arrangement. On the other, place in the world to be a child. Towards this aim, the the reasons why women volunteer to be surrogates or Volume 16 – Issue 1 – February 2020 ensuing Child Poverty Reduction Act (2018) legislated donate eggs may result in unintended consequences Policy Quarterly (PQ) is targeted at readers that current and future governments set child poverty from well-meaning policy. in the public sector, including politicians and rate targets and report on their progress, and a In terms of family disruption, the conversation their staff, public servants and a wide variety corresponding amendment to the Children’s Act over the role of the State in family reached a of professions, together with others interested (2014) required governments to devise and publish deafening level in 2019. As wha-nau and families in public issues. Its length and style are intended to make the journal accessible to periodic child wellbeing strategies. released shocking videos of their babies being busy readers. In their article in this issue of Policy Quarterly, removed from maternity wards within hours and Submissions: The journal welcomes Kelsey Brown and Donna Provoost of the Office of the days of birth, Oranga Tamariki was undergoing contributions of about 4,000 words, written Children’s Commissioner and Luke Fitzmaurice and another burst of change through amendments on any topic relating to governance, public Kiri Milne of Oranga Tamariki discuss the process passed under the Children’s and Young People’s policy and management. Articles submitted will be peer reviewed. Please submit articles by which children were included in the process of Well-being Act (1989)/Oranga Tamariki Act (1989). to the Editor: [email protected]. developing the nation’s first child and youth wellbeing These changes mandated Oranga Tamariki to Although issues will not usually have single strategy. Importantly, throughout this engagement ‘recognise and provide a practical commitment to themes, special issues may be published from process they discovered that children’s ideas around the principles of The Treaty of Waitangi’ and placed time to time on specific or general themes, their own wellbeing and the role of the government in wha-nau, hapu-ū, and iwi considerations at the centre perhaps to mark significant events. In such - cases, and on other occasions, contributions supporting them, rest on the wellbeing and support of of tamariki Maori wellbeing. These two factors shed may be invited from particular people. their family and wha-nau. light on the historical roots and current patterns of Subscriptions: The journal is available in A conundrum exists, however. Addressing ethnic inequity within the child welfare system and PDF format on the Institute for Governance the legislative mandate aimed at addressing them. and Policy Studies (IGPS) website: https:// child poverty is more publicly (and hence likely www.victoria.ac.nz/igps/policy-quarterly. more politically) acceptable than supporting family To that end, Len Cook discusses the crisis of Readers who wish to receive it by email wellbeing. While a large majority (80%) of citizens Ma-ori perception of the legitimacy of Oranga Tamariki should register as PQ subscribers igps@vuw. agree that child poverty is a problem in New Zealand, as a state actor and adjudicator of child risk. He does ac.nz. This service is free. opinions on the causes are split. An equal portion of so with an historical and current statistical portrait For all subscription and membership enquiries please email [email protected] or New Zealanders (40%) believe that child poverty is of inequities in the child welfare system, offering a post to Institute for Governance and Policy due to bad parenting and choices versus structural pathway forward through greater data transparency, Studies, P.O. Box 600, Wellington. factors, such as poor jobs, unaffordable housing, state accountability, and whūnau partnership. Electronic Access: The IGPS directs and inequality (Child Poverty Action Group, 2014). Continuing the discussion and building off a interested individuals to its website: seminar series hosted by Victoria University of www.igps.victoria.ac.nz where details of the A perceived tension arises, then, when children Institute’s publications and upcoming events stress that their wellbeing rests on the support their Wellington’s School of Government in 2019, seminar can be found. family receives, yet supporting families (vs. children speakers Emily Keddell, Ian Hyslop, David Hanna, Permission: In the interest of promoting directly) may be less palatable to the general public. and Claire Achmad offer their reflections on the debate and wider dissemination, the Given this context, policies and programmes that are state of the child welfare system. While each brings IGPS encourages use of all or part of the articles appearing in PQ, where there is no child-centred, yet empower and benefit families and their unique perspective from academic disciplines, element of commercial gain. Appropriate wha-nau, may be particularly important in the policy practice, and advocacy, a current thread points to the acknowledgement of both author and source toolkit. historical roots of ethnic inequities prevalent today, should be made in all cases. The IGPS Polly Atatoa Carr and colleagues demonstrate one and a call for structural, systems-wide reform that retains copyright. Please direct requests such child-centred initiative that can lead to greater involves a wha-nau-centred approach to caring for for permission to reprint articles from this - publication to [email protected]. family and whanau wellbeing. The Hamilton Children’s and supporting children at risk of harm. Editor: Jonathan Boston Team was established to support early intervention The articles in this special issue, while heavily Guest Editor: Kate Prickett among families at-risk of involvement with Oranga focused on some of the most vulnerable tamariki Editorial Board: Maria Bargh, Cheryl Barnes, Tamariki. This cross-sector approach displayed the in Aotearoa New Zealand, highlight the centrality Roger Blakeley, David Bromell, Simon - Chapple, Jo Cribb, Girol Karacaoglu, Gerald power of constructing a multi-faceted response to of family and whanau wellbeing in stemming the Minnee, Gail Pacheco, Anneliese Parkin, children’s needs in ways that empowered families systemic inequities in child poverty and state care. Kate Prickett, Mike Reid, Tim Ng, Andrea and has potential to enhance their independence and Supporting children involves shifting the public and Schollmann, Conal Smith, Mämari Stephens wellbeing. Importantly, this programme was targeted policy discourse in ways that recognises the primacy and Julia Talbot-Jones ISSN: 2324-1098 (Print) at families with multiple, complex and oft-thought of family wellbeing. ISSN: 2324-1101 (Online) intractable challenges. Volume 16, Issue 1 – February 2020 A closely connected challenge for policy-makers Kate Prickett Guest Editor Copy Editor: Rachel Barrowman and programmes aimed at supporting families and February 2020 Design & Layout: Aleck Yee children centres around who constitutes family, and Cover Photography: Aleck Yee Production: Alltex Design the role the state plays in influencing both family Reference Proof Reader: Vic Lipski formation and disruption. Rhonda Shaw challenges Child Poverty Action Group, (2014). New Zealanders’ policy-makers to think carefully around how and attitudes to child poverty: Research report. when to legislate about family matters. She does Retrieved February, 2020 from https://www.cpag. so through the lens of surrogacy laws and a rich org.nz/assets/MMResearchReport
Recommended publications
  • Surrogacy and Human Rights in New Zealand

    Surrogacy and Human Rights in New Zealand

    Rethinking Surrogacy Laws Te Kohuki Ture Kopu Whangai Surrogacy and Human Rights in New Zealand Rhonda Powell and Natalie Baird May 2020 CONTENTS CONTENTS ................................................................................................................................................ i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................................................................. ii TABLE OF ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................................ iii PART ONE: INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 1 Rethinking Surrogacy Laws / Te Kohuki Ture Kopu Whangai ............................................................. 1 Surrogacy and Human Rights .............................................................................................................. 2 The Core Human Rights at Stake ........................................................................................................ 2 Dealing with Conflicts between Rights in the Surrogacy Context ...................................................... 3 Future Law Reform ............................................................................................................................. 4 PART TWO: RIGHTS OF THE SURROGATE ............................................................................................... 5 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................
  • Kiwisaver and the Wealth of New Zealanders NZIER Perspective on the Joint Agency Evaluation Report

    Kiwisaver and the Wealth of New Zealanders NZIER Perspective on the Joint Agency Evaluation Report

    KiwiSaver and the wealth of New Zealanders NZIER perspective on the joint agency evaluation report NZIER report to the Financial Services Council August 2015 About NZIER NZIER is a specialist consulting firm that uses applied economic research and analysis to provide a wide range of strategic advice to clients in the public and private sectors, throughout New Zealand and Australia, and further afield. NZIER is also known for its long-established Quarterly Survey of Business Opinion and Quarterly Predictions. Our aim is to be the premier centre of applied economic research in New Zealand. We pride ourselves on our reputation for independence and delivering quality analysis in the right form, and at the right time, for our clients. We ensure quality through teamwork on individual projects, critical review at internal seminars, and by peer review at various stages through a project by a senior staff member otherwise not involved in the project. Each year NZIER devotes resources to undertake and make freely available economic research and thinking aimed at promoting a better understanding of New Zealand’s important economic challenges. NZIER was established in 1958. Authorship This paper was prepared at NZIER by Aaron Drew. It was quality approved by Peter Wilson. We acknowledge the financial support of the Financial Services Council in the preparation of this report. The assistance of Sarah Spring is also acknowledged. L13 Grant Thornton House, 215 Lambton Quay | PO Box 3479, Wellington 6140 Tel +64 4 472 1880 | [email protected] © NZ Institute of Economic Research (Inc) 2012. Cover image © Dreamstime.com NZIER’s standard terms of engagement for contract research can be found at www.nzier.org.nz.
  • Youth Health and Disability Services in New Zealand – a Policy Overview

    Youth Health and Disability Services in New Zealand – a Policy Overview

    The Pathways to Resilience Project Pathways to Youth Resilience: Youth Health and Disability Services in New Zealand – a policy overview Katie Stevens, Robyn Munford, Jackie Sanders, Nicola Stanley Clarke, Youthline Auckland, Mark Henaghan, Jackie Cumming, Sue Buckley, Nicola Grace, Kelly Tikao, Brigit Mirfin Veitch, Linda Liebenberg. With grateful thanks to the Ministry of Science and Innovation for funding the wider research programme and to the New Zealand Families Commission and Youthline Auckland Massey University Resilience Research Centre 2011 Table of Contents BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................ 2 LEGAL FRAMEWORKS .................................................................................................... 2 consent and confidentiality ..................................................................................... 3 POLICY ............................................................................................................................. 4 universal policies ....................................................................................................... 4 Youth specific policy .................................................................................................. 5 DELIVERY OF YOUTH HEALTH AMD DISABILITY SERVICES ........................................5 Youth one stop shops ................................................................................................. 6 Youth disability services ...........................................................................................
  • KIWISAVER NEW ZEALAND CASE STUDY: CHOICE and COMPETITION VANCE ARKINSTALL1

    KIWISAVER NEW ZEALAND CASE STUDY: CHOICE and COMPETITION VANCE ARKINSTALL1

    IX reforms HAPTER C COMING - UP AND ECENT R KIWISAVER NEW ZEALAND CASE STUDY: CHOICE AND COMPETITION VANCE ARKINSTALL1 1 Vance Arkinstall is Chief Executive of the Investment Savings and Insurance Association (“ISI”), which represents fund managers and life insurers and includes all major retail banks in its membership. Vance has previously held the positions of Managing Director of Norwich Union Life Insurance (NZ) Ltd and General Manager, Westpac Financial Services. He was also appointed by the New Zealand Government to chair the Periodic Report Group in order to review and report on the system of private provision for retirement in New Zealand. Vance has participated on a number of New Zealand Government Working Groups relating to life insurance, savings and investment. 381 . IX reforms HAPTER C COMING - UP AND ECENT R BacKGROUND COMMENTS The following brief background comments may assist in understanding how “KiwiSaver”, which commenced from July 1, 2007, fits into the New Zealand retirement provision system. New Zealand has operated a two-tier system of retirement income provision since approximately 1990. The first tier is provided by New Zealand Superannuation, a universal public pension funded from general taxation. The second tier consists of voluntary private provision by individuals to enhance their standard of living in retirement. The NZ welfare system also provides limited support in cases of particular hardship in retirement. I. NEW ZEALAND Superannuation (NZS) New Zealand (NZ) has provided a universal flat-rate individual pension since 1977. Eligibility is determined by age (65) and NZ residency. Entitlement to NZS is independent of income and there are no income tests or asset tests.
  • Illegale Märkte: Stand Der Sozialwissenschaftlichen Forschung

    Illegale Märkte: Stand Der Sozialwissenschaftlichen Forschung

    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Wehinger, Frank Working Paper Illegale Märkte: Stand der sozialwissenschaftlichen Forschung MPIfG Working Paper, No. 11/6 Provided in Cooperation with: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies (MPIfG), Cologne Suggested Citation: Wehinger, Frank (2011) : Illegale Märkte: Stand der sozialwissenschaftlichen Forschung, MPIfG Working Paper, No. 11/6, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/50554 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu MPIfG Working Paper 11/6 Forschungsbericht aus dem MPIfG Frank Wehinger Illegale Märkte Stand der sozialwissenschaftlichen Forschung MPIfG Working Paper Frank Wehinger Illegale Märkte: Stand der sozialwissenschaftlichen Forschung MPIfG Working Paper 11 /6.
  • Feminist Engagements in Aotearoa: 125 Years of Suffrage and Beyond

    Feminist Engagements in Aotearoa: 125 Years of Suffrage and Beyond

    Women’s Studies Association/Pae Akoranga Wahine and the Stout Research Centre for New Zealand Studies, Victoria University of Wellington Feminist Engagements in Aotearoa: 125 years of Suffrage and Beyond 21-23rd September 2018 Victoria University of Wellington, Rutherford House, Pipitea Campus, Wellington 1 3 September 2018 2 3 September 2018 Welcome Women’s Studies Association of New Zealand (WSANZ) Nau mai, haere mai ki Whanganui-a-Tara. Welcome to Wellington and to the 40th anniversary conference of the Women’s Studies Association NZ/ Pae Akoranga Wāhine. We are pleased to be holding this conference at Victoria University of Wellington/ Te Whare Wānanga o te Ūpoko o te Ika a Māui and to have the Stout Research Centre for New Zealand Studies as our co-hosts. The timing, to coincide with the 125th anniversary of women’s suffrage in New Zealand, is particularly auspicious. The Convenors and Conference Committee have worked hard to put together a stimulating programme and associated events and we hope that you find it enriching, thought-provoking and empowering. We encourage you to enjoy the conference and to look beyond to the many suffrage-related commemorative exhibitions and events that the city has to offer. We are particularly grateful the Ministry of Culture and Heritage, the National Library and the Chinese Poll Tax Fund, among others, for sponsoring aspects of the conference. Nga mihi, Hilary Lapsley, Convenor, WSANZ/PAW. Convenors Ann Weatherall and Kate Hunter 3 3 September 2018 4 3 September 2018 Conference Timetable Friday 21 September 2018 4.00pm - 5.00pm He Tohu Exhibition - Hosted by the National Library of New Zealand/Te Puna Matauranga o Aotearoa, Molesworth Street.
  • Sixth Periodic Report by the Government of New Zealand 2021

    Sixth Periodic Report by the Government of New Zealand 2021

    United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child Sixth Periodic Report by the Government of New Zealand 2021 Contents List of Acronyms ............................................................................................................................................ vi I. New Developments................................................................................................................................ 1 Reply to paragraph 2(a) ................................................................................................................................. 1 Reply to paragraphs 2(b) and 2(c) ................................................................................................................. 2 Reply to paragraph 3 ...................................................................................................................................... 2 II. Rights under the Convention and the Optional Protocols ................................................................ 3 A. General measures of implementation ................................................................................................. 3 Reply to paragraph 4(a) ................................................................................................................................. 3 Reply to paragraphs 4(b) and 4(c) ................................................................................................................. 3 Reply to paragraph 4(d) ................................................................................................................................
  • 00134-9781455228232.Pdf

    00134-9781455228232.Pdf

    IMF Working Paper This is a Working Paper and the author( s) would welcome any comments on the present text Citations should refer to a Working paper of the International Monetary Fund, The © 1996 International Monetary Fund views expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent those of the Fund. WP/96/122 INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND Southeast Asia and Pacific Department Accountability and Transparency in the Public Sector: The New Zealand Experience Prepared by Marco Cangiano1 Authorized for distribution by Christopher Browne November 1996 Abstract This paper describes the reforms introduced in the New Zealand public sector since the mid-1980s. The reforms included corporatization and privatization of most state-owned enterprises, the shift from a cash-basis to an accrual-basis accounting system and the compilation of a balance sheet for the central government and its entities, performance-based arrangements for the delivery of core government outputs; and institutional changes in expenditure control mechanisms. The paper also summarizes the impact of the reforms on government revenue and spending patterns, and discusses lessons learned from New Zealand's experience. JEL Classification Numbers: E62, G38, H50, H61, L33, M41 1This is a slightly revised version of a paper presented at a conference "Trasparenza dei Conti Pubblici e Controllo della Spesa" organized by the Universita degli Studi di Bergamo (Italy), June 8-9, 1996. I wish to thank Geoff Bascand, Susanna Barsella, Christopher Browne, Margaret Kelly, Mark Stone, and the New Zealand Treasury for comments and suggestions on earlier drafts, and Anton Op de Beke, with whom I discussed extensively many of the features of the New Zealand reforms.
  • New Zealand Report Oliver Hellmann, Jennifer Curtin, Aurel Croissant (Coordinator)

    New Zealand Report Oliver Hellmann, Jennifer Curtin, Aurel Croissant (Coordinator)

    New Zealand Report Oliver Hellmann, Jennifer Curtin, Aurel Croissant (Coordinator) Sustainable Governance Indicators 2020 © vege - stock.adobe.com Sustainable Governance SGI Indicators SGI 2020 | 2 New Zealand Report Executive Summary New Zealand’s year was overshadowed by the right-wing terrorist attack on a mosque in Christchurch in March of 2019, which killed 51 people. However, it would be wrong to interpret this horrific incident as a failure of governance failure. Instead, the decisive and swift political response in the aftermath of the attack demonstrates that New Zealand’s political system is equipped with high levels of institutional capacity. Within weeks of the politically motivated mass shooting, the government passed tighter guns laws, rolled out a gun buy-back scheme, and established a specialist unit tasked with investigating extremist online content. Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern was also widely praised for her sensitivity and compassion in the wake of the Christchurch massacre. Generally speaking, policymaking is facilitated by New Zealand’s Westminster-style democracy, which concentrates political power in the executive and features very few veto players. Even though the mixed-member electoral system – which replaced the old first-past-the-post system in 1996 – produces a moderately polarized party system and typically fails to deliver absolute parliamentary majorities, this does not impede cross-party agreements in policymaking. However, while New Zealand’s political system is commonly regarded as one of the highest-quality democracies in the world, the country struggles with issues of media pluralism. The media market is dominated by (mostly foreign-owned) commercial conglomerates, which place greater emphasis on entertainment than on critical news-gathering.
  • Application of Portfolio Theory to New Zealand's Public Sector

    Application of Portfolio Theory to New Zealand's Public Sector

    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Huther, Jeff Working Paper An Application of Portfolio Theory to New Zealand's Public Sector New Zealand Treasury Working Paper, No. 98/04 Provided in Cooperation with: The Treasury, New Zealand Government Suggested Citation: Huther, Jeff (1998) : An Application of Portfolio Theory to New Zealand's Public Sector, New Zealand Treasury Working Paper, No. 98/04, New Zealand Government, The Treasury, Wellington This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/205398 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ www.econstor.eu TREASURY WORKING PAPER 98/4 An Application of Portfolio Theory to New Zealand’s Public Sector.
  • THE KIWI EFFECT What Britain Can Learn from New Zealand the KIWI EFFECT What Britain Can Learn from New Zealand

    THE KIWI EFFECT What Britain Can Learn from New Zealand the KIWI EFFECT What Britain Can Learn from New Zealand

    THE KIWI EFFECT What Britain can learn from New Zealand THE KIWI EFFECT What Britain can learn from New Zealand Robert O'Quinn and Nigel Ashford Adam Smith Institute 1996 About the Authors. Robert O'Quinn is an economist and currently serves as the Policy Analyst for Economics and Trade in the Asian Studies Centre of the Heritage Foundation in Washington D.C.. Dr. Nigel Ashford is Principal Lecturer in Politics at the University of Staffordshire, England. Bibliographical information This edition first published in the UK in 1996 by ASI (Research) Ltd This edition © Adam Smith Research Trust 1996 All rights reserved. Apart from fair dealing for the purpose of private study, criticism or review, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any way or by any means, without the consent of the publisher. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author alone and do not necessarily reflect any views held by the publisher or copyright owner. They have been selected for their intellectual vigour and are presented as a contribution to public debate. ISBN 1 873712 73 1 Set in Palatino 12pt Printed in the UK by Imediacopy Ltd iv Contents Executive Summary 5 Comprehensive reform 5 No sacred cows 5 Civil service reform 6 Sound finances 6 Industrial relations 7 A laboratory for reform 7 Introduction 8 The burden of controls 8 Liberalization under Labour, and beyond 11 Trade liberalization 11 Financial liberalization 12 Unsubsidized agriculture 12 Industrial deregulation 12 Tax reform
  • The Kiwisaver Scheme

    The Kiwisaver Scheme

    Review of the KiwiSaver Fund Manager Market Dynamics and Allocation of Assets Andreas Heuser, Jack Kwok, Daniel Snethlage and Dillon Watts September 2015 Erratum September 2015: A previous version of this paper included incorrect information on the returns to the Government Superannuation Fund (page 62) and included an inaccurate statement about the investment horizon and mandate of that fund (page 68). These have now been corrected. Erratum June 2016: A previous version of this paper contained text in the Executive Summary (page 1) which did not accurately reflect the data presented on international fee comparisons (page 46). © Crown Copyright This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence. In essence, you are free to copy, distribute and adapt the work, as long as you attribute the work to the Crown and abide by the other licence terms. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Please note that no departmental or governmental emblem, logo or Coat of Arms may be used in any way which infringes any provision of the Flags, Emblems, and Names Protection Act 1981. Attribution to the Crown should be in written form and not by reproduction of any such emblem, logo or Coat of Arms. ISBN: 978-0-908337-06-4 (Online) The Treasury URL at September 2015 for this document is http://www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/research-policy/tp/kiwisaver The PURL for this document is http://purl.oclc.org/nzt/p-1791 Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................. 1 1 Background and Motivation ............................................................................................... 2 1.1 The KiwiSaver Scheme .............................................................................................