American Attitude Towards Philippine Independence During President Wilson's Administration

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

American Attitude Towards Philippine Independence During President Wilson's Administration Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Master's Theses Theses and Dissertations 1951 American Attitude Towards Philippine Independence During President Wilson's Administration Mary Annette Lapinski Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Lapinski, Mary Annette, "American Attitude Towards Philippine Independence During President Wilson's Administration" (1951). Master's Theses. 1095. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses/1095 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1951 Mary Annette Lapinski .. ' AlIIRICAM AmTUDE TOIARl. PRILIPPIR Im>E~CE OORIIO PImSllJtrrt WILSON'S AmIlIIS'f!tA1'IOJl by Siat.el" IIar7 Annette tapluk1, t'.1., o. s. ,. A Th.a1a Subadtt,ed to t.he facult.y ot the Graduate School of Loyola Uniwra1't,f 111 Partial Pult11lmant of tJ1e ltequ1nmenu tor \be De..... of Kuter of Ana IftROD'OO'1'101' The histoJ'7 of the relation of the GOYeraent of the UD1ted States to the Philippine Islands is perhaps the most interesting experiment in modern lmper1aliSll. It was an exper1unt in preparation for independence. When the United States annexed the Philippine Islands it did so in the pise of a lib­ erator of all oppressed people trom the domination of Spain. The United States proclaimed its intentiOJl to establish coaplete Mlf-government in the Islands atter s short period of tutelage. President Mollnle1 instructed the Taft Cou1esion to treat the Philippine people -with the sa.. cQQJ"teq aDd respect for their personal dip1t7 which the people of the tJlli ted State. are aecus­ tOMd to require frOll eaoh other .,,1 The Aaer1call-Philippine relationship hes been IIOre IUCc.aef'ul than ell1 other which hee ex18ted,in aodern t1raes between 8 dominant and a dependent people aDd this had a tar reaching ettect on the colonies in Asia. Asla watched whether JJnerica will put into operation her principle of the content of the governed and of aelt-dete1'll1nation. While the "'rioans fullJ accepted aDd ineisted upon American reeponsibillt, tor the IelaDds the, ne.. rtheles8 gave the largest possible participation of Filipino in letislation and administration and an increa8ed measure or autOllOll7 a8 enlighteDMllt and experience advanced. After the American. have famillarized the rilipinos with the institutions of modern 1 Cameron W. forbes, lllI PAilippi. IllIab.. Cambridge, Mass., 1945, 389. ii iii ... democraoy and have given them an opportunity to adopt them to their own uses, the Filipinos believed themselves sufficiently numerous, compact and dieci- plined to begin independent life 88 a nation.. It was insistently urged by Filipino spokesmen that a stable government existed and that the United States should redeem its pledge. It i. t.he purpose of t.h18 lJOrk to present. President W. Wilson's interest in the Filipino people and their struggle for independence, Congres- aional discussions in favor and agaill8t Philippine independence and American economic polia.y in the Philippines. TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page INTRODUCTION • • • • • • • • • • • • • • .. " . • • • • • • • • ii I. Pru~SIDENT WILSON'S PHILIPPINE POLICY •• • • • • • • • • • • • 1 Acquisition ot the Philippine Islands~Public opinion re­ garding the Philippine.--Wilson'. opinion--Reaolution passed by United state. not to annex the islands permanentlY-­ President Mclinley-s and Secretar.y Root's policy--William H. Tatt'. tirst GoYernor-General ot the Ialanda--Democratic Convention 1900--Baltimore Con.... ntion 19l2--W'ilsont s accept­ ance speech-Meaaage ot congratulations t 0 the President­ elect by the Philippine A.semblY--Re.olution ot the Philip­ pine Asseably--Manuel Quezon--Franci. B. Harri.on appointed Governor-General ot the Philippine.--Wilson' •••••age to Congre.s December 2, 19l)--Wilson'a measageto Congre.s December a, 1914--Wilson t a ..aaage 10 Congress December 7 I 191;~ilaonta speech at Hew York. II. CONGRESSIONAL ATTITUDE ON THE JONES BILL • • • • • .. • • • • 13 Independenc. campaign in Aaeriea-Independence campaign in the Philippine Ialanda-The Republican plank ot 1916- Introduction ot the Philippin. bill by Mr. William A. Jones-­ Pro.tsions ot the Philippine bill--opinion ot Mr. Miller, Mr. Feas, Mr. Humphrey on the Philippine bill--The Hous. passe. the Philippine bill--Deteat ot the Philippine bill in the Senate--Presldent Wilson' ••••aageto the Filipinos rega~ding the Jon.s bll1--opinion ot leading newspapers on the Jone. bill--R.introduction ot the bill in the Houae and the Senate--Debate. on the bill in the Senat.--Arguaents against and in tavor ot Philippine independence. III. CONGRESSIONAL ATTITUDE ON 'I'ID~ CLARKE AMENDMENT • • • • • • • 28 Introduction ot the Clarke Amendment--opinioft ot Senators, Colt, Borah, and Thc:;•• on t.he Clarke Amendment--Senator McCumber's Am.nda.nt to the Clarke Aaendment--Debate. on the iY Clarke Amendment in the Senate--Critici.. ot the Clarke amendment bl eX-Secretary Garrison and Cardinal Gibbons-­ Quezon on Philippine independence--opposition or Hr. Towner and Mr. Fitzgerald to the Clarke asendment--Deteat ot the Clarke amendment in the House-Approval of the Jones bill b~r Congress and President Wilson-Powers of the Governor­ General under the Jones Act. IV. AME:RICAN ECONOMIC POLICY IN TH~: .PHILIPPINES • • • • • • • • • 44 American effort to improve economic conditions ot the Fili­ pino people-Attitude of the Democratic partl on taxation ot Philippine exports~Introduction or & provision to the tarift bill H~ R. 3321--objections to this provision bl Mr. Luther, Mr. Frederick, Mr. Britten, Mr" Bartholat, and Mr. Willis­ Petition ot the Cigar Makers' International Union ot Amer­ ica--Answera to the objectiona bl Mr. Underwood and Mr. Mur­ ral--Mr. 'ordnel's amendment to the Underwood-Simmons bill-­ Defeat ot Mr. 'ordnel' a amendment-The provisions to the bill H. R. 3321 passed bl the Houae and referred to the Sen­ ate Finance Committee--objections to the proposed bill by Senators, Newlanda, Ransdell, and Lodge--Discussiona on the labor questions by Senators, Boies and Penrose--Petition of the Manila Merchant's AS80ciation--Introduction of the bill H. R. 11471 in the House--objections to this bill hI Mr. 'eating-Debate. in tavor ot the bill b)" the Republican partl--Bill passed by both hou ... and approved bl Presi­ dent Wilson--F11ipino attitude towards tree trade. V.. CONSCUSION. .. .. • .. • • • • .. • • .. .. • .. • • • • .. .. .. .. • .. 61 Governor-General Harrison'. Philippin.e policy·.... Filipiniza­ t1on--X.provements in the Islands--Creation ot the Council of State--Ph11ippine Independence Mission 1n the United States--President W1lson t s letter to the Mission--Plea tor independence 1n Congress--Governor-Oeneral Harrison'. report-President WUson' s message to Congress December 7, 1920-Senator Henry Cabot Lodge-Jones Act of 1916-­ Advantages or selt-government in the Philippine Islands. ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAi'HY • .. .. .. .. .. .. .. • • • • • . .. 69 AP?E}'!DICES .. .. • .. .. .... .. • • • • • . .. .. • • • • . .. .. .. 75 CHAPT1<:R I PRESIDKNT W. WILSON'S PHILIPPINE POLICY The acquisition of the Philippines was the greatest blunder of American dip1omacy.1 The purpose of the war of 1898 was to free Cuba. The decision to send the fleet to Manila Bay was made by the Navy rather than by the President and Cabinet, and American victory there posed a problem for which neither the American government nor people was prepared. Opposition to the treaty with Spain was wid.espread and intense. There was a long and heated debate in t."1e Senate. The expansionists listed the glorious tropical wealth of the Islands and made 6tagl~ering prophecies about the inevitable increaRe in our China trade. Opponents of the peace treaty argued that to force our rule on the }I~i1ipino people 1Ifas a violation not only of our war aims, but our Constitution and even of our Declaration of Independence. It would make us an imperialistic nation. Only by the most energet1.c efforts was the administration able to obtain the necessary two-thirds vote for rati- fication of the treaty. In its efforts it received help from William J. Bryan, anti-imperialist, who urged the senators of his party to vote for the treaty in order to end the war.2 1 Samuel F'. Bemis, ! Diplol'1atic History 2f ~ United States, New York, 1950, 482. 2 ~., 473. 2 During• this time public opinion regarding the Philippines was form- A year attar the treaty ot peace was signed at Paris on December 10, 1898, Wilson said, "It was _y personal wish at the time that we should not take the Philippines. It we sent our institutions in manuscript they would sutfer the same tate which betell 8 dress suit once captured by 88vages.n3 The commerciel and industrial interes;ts ot An.rica leaming thet the islands lie in the gateway ot the vaet and undeveloped markets were in favor of keeping the Philippines. The navaliets were emphasizing the military impor­ tance ot the Islands and suggesting the danger to American interests should Germany or Japan annex them.4 Popular teeling was being aroused by the combination of the economic and strategic value of the Islands, so the United states on February 14, 1899, passed a resolution, part of which read, it ie not intended permanently to annex such islands as an inte­ gral part ot the United States, but it is the intention ot the United States to eetablish on said islande a government suitable to the wante and conditione or the inbabitante of said islands, to prepare them tor selt-govemunt end in due time to make such disposition of eaid ielands as will best promote the intereets of the citi,ens or the United States and the inhabitants of said islands.5 Preeldent McKinley in his instructions to Secretary Root for the guidance or the Philippine Commission said, that the policy ie "extension of selt-government to the Philippine Islands by gradual steps trom time to 3 Harle,.
Recommended publications
  • Quintin Paredes 1884–1973
    H former members 1900–1946 H Quintin Paredes 1884–1973 RESIDENT COMMISSIONER 1935–1938 NACIONALISTA FROM THE PHILIPPINES s the first Resident Commissioner to represent eventually moved to Manila and studied law under the the Philippines after it became a commonwealth direction of another of his brothers, Isidro. He worked during of the United States, Quintin Paredes worked the day, studied at night, and after passing the bar exam, toA revise the economic relationship between his native Paredes briefly took a job with the Filipino government in archipelago and the mainland. Paredes championed Manila before moving to the private sector.4 Paredes married Philippine independence, constantly reminding policymakers Victoria Peralta, and the couple had 10 children.5 of his home’s history as a valuable and vital trading partner. In 1908 Paredes joined the solicitor general’s office In testimony before congressional committees and in in Manila as a prosecuting attorney and rapidly rose to speeches on the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives, the solicitor general post in 1917. The very next year, Paredes countered common misconceptions about Filipinos Paredes accepted the job as attorney general, becoming and worked to place the islands on stable economic footing as the Philippines’ top lawyer. Within two years, he became they moved toward independence. secretary of justice in the cabinet of Governor General One of 10 children, Quintin Paredes was born in the Francis Burton Harrison, a former Member of the U.S. northwestern town of Bangued, in the Philippines’ Abra House of Representatives from New York. President Province, on September 9, 1884, to Juan Felix and Regina Woodrow Wilson nominated Paredes to serve as an Babila Paredes.
    [Show full text]
  • Philippine Independence in U.S. History: a Car, Not a Train
    Philippine Independence in U.S. History: A Car, Not a Train Daniel Immerwahr Northwestern University Pacific Historical Review, forthcoming August 2020 The Fourth of July, 1946, was an unusual Independence Day for the United States. On the one hand, it commemorated the thirteen colonies’ dec- laration of independence from the British Empire. But on the other, it was the day when the Philippines, the largest colony the United States had ever held, gained freedom from the U.S. Empire. In Manila, a specially stitched U.S. flag with one star from every Philippine province descended the flagpole. Up the same pole rose the Philippine flag, previously banned by colonial officials. “There were not many dry eyes in the crowd,” an observer noted.1 Independence was a significant turning point, and scholars of Philippine history have been particularly attentive to its character. Did it secure freedom or merely grant “independence without decolonisation,” as Alfred W. McCoy has put it?2 They have asked, too, about the consequences of independence for domestic politics. There are disagreements, but what no one debates is that independence was a major event, sending large waves crashing in all directions.3 In U.S. historiography, however, the events of 1946 have made hardly a ripple. Discussions of the loss of the country’s largest colony, containing ap- proximately 18 million people at the time, rarely feature in the broad narratives about the United States that synthesize the field’s findings. The relevant vol- ume in the comprehensive Penguin History
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Government Printing Office Style Manual, 2008
    U.S. Government Printing Offi ce Style Manual An official guide to the form and style of Federal Government printing 2008 PPreliminary-CD.inddreliminary-CD.indd i 33/4/09/4/09 110:18:040:18:04 AAMM Production and Distribution Notes Th is publication was typeset electronically using Helvetica and Minion Pro typefaces. It was printed using vegetable oil-based ink on recycled paper containing 30% post consumer waste. Th e GPO Style Manual will be distributed to libraries in the Federal Depository Library Program. To fi nd a depository library near you, please go to the Federal depository library directory at http://catalog.gpo.gov/fdlpdir/public.jsp. Th e electronic text of this publication is available for public use free of charge at http://www.gpoaccess.gov/stylemanual/index.html. Use of ISBN Prefi x Th is is the offi cial U.S. Government edition of this publication and is herein identifi ed to certify its authenticity. ISBN 978–0–16–081813–4 is for U.S. Government Printing Offi ce offi cial editions only. Th e Superintendent of Documents of the U.S. Government Printing Offi ce requests that any re- printed edition be labeled clearly as a copy of the authentic work, and that a new ISBN be assigned. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800; DC area (202) 512-1800 Fax: (202) 512-2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402-0001 ISBN 978-0-16-081813-4 (CD) II PPreliminary-CD.inddreliminary-CD.indd iiii 33/4/09/4/09 110:18:050:18:05 AAMM THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE STYLE MANUAL IS PUBLISHED UNDER THE DIRECTION AND AUTHORITY OF THE PUBLIC PRINTER OF THE UNITED STATES Robert C.
    [Show full text]
  • English Literacy: Legal Sanction for Discrimination Arnold H
    Notre Dame Law Review Volume 45 | Issue 1 Article 2 6-1-1971 English Literacy: Legal Sanction for Discrimination Arnold H. Leibowitz Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Arnold H. Leibowitz, English Literacy: Legal Sanction for Discrimination, 45 Notre Dame L. Rev. 7 (1969). Available at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr/vol45/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by NDLScholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Notre Dame Law Review by an authorized administrator of NDLScholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ENGLISH LITERACY: LEGAL SANCTION FOR DISCRIMINATION Arnold H. Leibowitz* I. Introduction Recently the United States Supreme Court decided two cases which brought to the fore the complex question of the degree of political participation per- mitted non-English-speaking persons in the United States. The first, Katzenbach v. Morgan,' sustained the constitutionality of section 4(e) of the Voting Rights Act of 19652 - legislation which had invalidated state English literacy tests applied to individuals who had acquired a sixth grade education in American schools where English was not the language of instruction. The second, Cardona v. Power,' questioned, without deciding, the constitutionality of English literacy tests applied to a person literate in another language. These two cases discussed only one area of American public life - voting where participation is legally dependent upon knowledge of the English language. Similar statutory prescriptions are found elsewhere covering access to, or opera- tions of, schools, businesses, public offices, and various governmental operations.
    [Show full text]
  • COLORADO STATE COLLEGE of EDUCATION Greeley, Colorado
    COLORADO STATE COLLEGE OF EDUCATION Greeley, Colorado t h e INDEPENDENCE o f t h e Ph i l i p p i n e s A Thesis in Partial Fulfillment of the of the Degree of Masters of Arts by Julian R. Betita Department of History and Political Science Division of Social Studies August 17, 1935 * * c . APPROVED JBTt HAJOR PROFESSOR ^ J h JS i cJttLAJUO-t*— ______ DIVISIOH (A/-* t (/ * £ ABSTRACT THE INDEPENDENCE OF THE PHILIPPINES Julian R* Betits 1. Problem The purpose of the study in this field is to deter­ mine the political status of the Philippine Islands under the sovereignty of the United States; to analyse the policy of the United States in regard to the independence of the Philippine Islands* and to find out what really is the desire of the Filipino people in regard to gaining their independence* The aims of this study are to give an account of the struggle for the independence of the Philippines by the Filipinos; to gather facts relating to the independence of the Philippines* and to organize these Tacts into a history of the independence of the Philippines* 2* Procedure The data for this study were obtained from the united States documentst Cl) The Congressional Records (2) The Senate Executive Documents C3) The House Executive Documents ^ (4) Books and Magazines Items were interpreted in accordance with the meaning of each unit of the data and the content of the problem 11 discussed in these documents* Personal letters were sent to Dr* Camilo Oslas* the Resident Philippine Commissioner at Washington, D* CT** in regard to some definite questions,.
    [Show full text]
  • 1902: Congressional Record-Senate. 4999
    • 1902: CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-SENATE. 4999 By Mr. BENTON: A bill (H. R. 14169) granting an increase of and the proper marking of the same-to the Committee on Ways pension to Thomas R. May-to the Committee on Invalid Pen­ and Means. sions. Also, memorial of the same association, for an amendment of Al o, a bill (H. R.14170) grantingapensipn toAbnerT. Smith­ the census law, providing for an annual classified census of live to the Committee on Pensions. stock-to the Select Committee on the Census. Also, a bill (H. R. 14171) granting an increase of pension to By Mr. HEPBURN: Resolutions of Mine Workers' Union of Francis Allred-to the Committee on Pensions. Seymour, Iowa, against foreign immigration-to the Committee Also. a bill (H. R. 14172) granting an increase of pension to on Immigration and Naturalization. Peter W. Duffield-to the Committee on Invalid Pensions. Also, resolutions of the same union, favoring Chinese exclusion­ By Mr. BOREING: A bill (H. R. 14173) to correct the military to the Committee on Foreign Affairs. record of Jonathan King-to the Committee on Military Affairs. Also, resolutions of the General Conference of the Reorgan­ By Mr. COWHERD: A bill (H. R. 14174) granting an increase ized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day&lints, held atLamoni, of pension to Griffith T. Murphy-to the Committee on Invalid Iowa, favoring an amendment to the Constitution making po­ Pensions. lygamy a crime-to the Committee on the Judiciary. Also, a bill (IT. R. 14175) for the relief of Miss L. V. Belt, Also, resolution of the Iowa Bankers' Association, Council Bluffs, administratrix of estate of Alfred C.
    [Show full text]
  • Race and Ethnicity in the Era of the Philippine-American War, 1898-1914
    Allegiance and Identity: Race and Ethnicity in the Era of the Philippine-American War, 1898-1914 by M. Carmella Cadusale Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the History Program YOUNGSTOWN STATE UNIVERSITY August, 2016 Allegiance and Identity: Race and Ethnicity in the Era of the Philippine-American War, 1898-1914 M. Carmella Cadusale I hereby release this thesis to the public. I understand that this thesis will be made available from the OhioLINK ETD Center and the Maag Library Circulation Desk for public access. I also authorize the University or other individuals to make copies of this thesis as needed for scholarly research. Signature: M. Carmella Cadusale, Student Date Approvals: Dr. L. Diane Barnes, Thesis Advisor Date Dr. David Simonelli, Committee Member Date Dr. Helene Sinnreich, Committee Member Date Dr. Salvatore A. Sanders, Dean of Graduate Studies Date ABSTRACT Filipino culture was founded through the amalgamation of many ethnic and cultural influences, such as centuries of Spanish colonization and the immigration of surrounding Asiatic groups as well as the long nineteenth century’s Race of Nations. However, the events of 1898 to 1914 brought a sense of national unity throughout the seven thousand islands that made the Philippine archipelago. The Philippine-American War followed by United States occupation, with the massive domestic support on the ideals of Manifest Destiny, introduced the notion of distinct racial ethnicities and cemented the birth of one national Philippine identity. The exploration on the Philippine American War and United States occupation resulted in distinguishing the three different analyses of identity each influenced by events from 1898 to 1914: 1) The identity of Filipinos through the eyes of U.S., an orientalist study of the “us” versus “them” heavily influenced by U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historical Context and Legal Basis of the Philippine Treaty Limits
    The Historical Context and Legal Basis of the Philippine Treaty Limits Lowell B. Bautista * I. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... 2 A. Territorial Integrity as an International Legal Norm................... 3 B. The Philippine Nation-State ......................................................... 6 1. The Philippine Archipelago as a Single Territorial Entity..... 6 2. The Philippine Declaration of Independence........................ 8 II. THE CESSION OF THE PHILIPPINES FROM SPAIN TO THE U.S.................. 9 A. State Succession in International Law.......................................... 9 B. The Spanish Title over the Philippine Archipelago .................... 12 C. The American Title over the Philippine Archipelago ................. 14 D. Treaties Defining the Philippine Treaty Limits........................... 15 1. The Treaty of Paris of 1898................................................. 16 2. The Cession Treaty of 1900 ................................................ 19 3. The Boundaries Treaty of 1930........................................... 20 III. THE TERRITORIAL BOUNDARIES OF THE PHILIPPINES ......................... 21 A. Historic Rights in International Law.......................................... 21 B. The Philippine Historic Right of Title over the Treaty Limits..... 23 C. The Juridical Function of the Boundaries.................................. 26 IV. CONCLUSION .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Chinese Mestizo in Philippine History
    Reprinted from THE JOURNAL SOUTHEAST ASIAN HISTORY (Vol. 5, No. 1) March 1964 (pp. 62-100) The Chinese Mestizo in Philippine History By E. Wickberg East Asian Series, Reprint No. 10 INTERNATIONAL STUDIES CENTER FOR EAST ASIAN STUDIES THE UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS Lawrence, Kansas CENTER FOR EAST ASIAN STUDIES 1. The Patrimonial Thesis and Pre-Modern Japa­ nese Herrschaft, by Norman Jacobs. 2. The Phantom Slasher of Taipei: Mass Hysteria in a Non-Western Society, by Norman Jacobs. 3. Early Chinese Economic Influences in the Philip­ pines, by Edgar Wickberg. 4. Some Aspects of Korean Acculturation and Value Orientation Since 1950, by Felix Moos. 5. The Philippine Political Party System, by Carl H. Lande. 6. Religion and Politics in Japan: The Case of the Soka Gakkai, by Felix Moos. 7. Some Aspects of Park Chang No Kyo—A Korean Revitalization Movement, by Felix Moos. 8. The Philippines, by Carl H, Lande. 9. General Artemio Ricarte & Japan, by Grant K. Goodman. 10. The Chinese Mestizo in Philippine History, by E. Wickberg. THE CHINESE MESTIZO IN PHILIPPINE HISTORY E. VVlCKBERG. THE CHINESE MESTIZO IN PHILIPPINE HISTORY* E. WlCKBERG. Students of Southeast Asian history have had little to say about the historical role played by the Chinese mestizo in that region. Although studies of the Chinese in Southeast Asia have devoted some attention to the position of native-born Chinese as opposed to immigrant Chinese, the native-born Chinese of mixed Chinese- native ancestry is rarely singled out for specific treatment. Perhaps this is because in most parts of Southeast Asia the Chinese mestizos (to use the Philippine term for persons of mixed Chinese-native ancestry) have not been formally and legally recognized as a separate group — one whose membership is strictly defined by genealogical considerations rather then by place of birth, and one which, by its possession of a unique combination of cultural characteristics, could be easily distinguished from both the Chinese and the native com­ munities.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional "Record-Rouse
    16010 CONGRESSIONAL "RECORD--ROUSE. OcToBER 1, EhfERGRNeY REVI:NUE LEGISLATION. Arthur Freeman to be an assistant surgeon in the Medical 1\Ir. THO:UP 0~ submitted three RmPndruents intended to Re, ene Corps. be prormsed by biro to the bi!l (H. R .. IS: !n) to inc:rense the ~...,t·edric- L. Conklin to be an assistant surgeon Ln the l\Jedical inter-na I re,·enue. and for other ptu-po. e . which were referred Reserve Corps. to the· Committee on Finance and ordered to be printed. A. CoDtee Thompson to be an assistant surgeon in the Medical l\Jr. WII .. L1A~1S snbmitted six Rmendments intended to ·be Resel'Ve Corp . proposed by him to the bill (H. n:. 1 91) to increase the POSTMASTERS, internHl revenue. and for other purposes. which were referred ALABAMA. to the Collillilttee on Finance aud ordered to be prilited. C. N. Parnell, Maplesville. RECESS. GEORGIA. Mr. KF..llX. I move that the Senate take a recess until George G. Brinson. Millen. to-morrow nt 11 o'clock a:. m. Emma Pettis, Ca..ve Spring. The uwtiou was agreed· to; and (at 4 o'clock and 45 minutE:'.s MISSISSIPPI, p. m .. Thursday. O<:tuber 1, 1914) the Senate took a recess until Edga-r G. Harris, Laurel. to-~orrow, .Ii'riday~ October 2, 1914, at 11 o'c.lvc.k a . .m. MTSSOURI. J. Vance Bumbarger, Memphi . NO'MINATIOXS~ NEBRASKA. Execncti~e nomination recei<t:ed by the Senate- October 1 ( le'g­ H. C. Letson, Red Cloud. islu.ti re day of SeptemlJ~r 28).
    [Show full text]
  • Philippines 2019 Human Rights Report
    PHILIPPINES 2019 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Philippines is a multiparty, constitutional republic with a bicameral legislature. President Rodrigo Roa Duterte, elected in May 2016, began his constitutionally limited six-year term in June 2016. Midterm elections in May for 12 (of 24 total) senators, all congressional representatives, and local government leaders were seen as generally free and fair, despite reports of violence and vote buying. The ruling party and allies won all 12 Senate seats and maintained a roughly two-thirds majority in the 306-seat House of Representatives. Barangay (village) and youth council elections originally scheduled for 2021 were rescheduled for December 5, 2022 so that local and national elections will occur in the same year. The Philippine National Police (PNP) is charged with maintaining internal security in most of the country and reports to the Department of the Interior. The Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP), which reports to the Department of National Defense, is responsible for external security but also carries out domestic security functions in regions with a high incidence of conflict, particularly the Mindanao region. The two agencies share responsibility for counterterrorism and counterinsurgency operations. The PNP Special Action Force is responsible for urban counterterrorism operations. President Duterte’s May 2017 declaration of martial law for the entire region of Mindanao and the Sulu Archipelago was extended until the end of the year, giving the military expanded powers in the area. Governors, mayors, and other local officials have considerable influence over local police units, including appointment of top departmental and municipal police officers and the provision of resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Partners in Crime
    PARTNERS IN CRIME: FEDERAL CRIME CONTROL POLICY AND THE STATES, 1894 – 1938 G. Jack Benge, Jr. A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2006 Committee: Judith Sealander, Advisor Scott Highhouse Graduate Faculty Representative Gary R. Hess Donald G. Neiman ii ABSTRACT Judith Sealander, Advisor The dramatic expansion of federal criminal law jurisdiction and policing responsibilities in recent times has raised questions regarding the historical origins of these developments and their impact upon the continuing efficacy of the nation’s federal system of government. This dissertation examines, within the context of federal criminal law enforcement and the evolving nature of crime, those social, economic, and legal forces and events that played a critical role in the growth of the states’ police powers and made federal collaboration an increasingly important factor in the suppression of crime. Since the founding of this nation, federal anti-crime legislation, which tended to be reactionary in its formulation, inconsistent in its development, and supplemental by design, implicitly embodied a policy that forbade the impairment of the powers of the states. This orientation remained a fundamental aspect of federal criminal jurisdiction until well after the New Deal, the central point of this thesis, and did not begin to change until the latter half of the century when the nation’s doctrinal ties to federalism and its faith in the importance of local police powers in the constitutional balance that defined the nation’s political structure were substantially weakened.
    [Show full text]