Senate Education Committee Meeting
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Colorectal Cancer
Preventing Colorectal Cancer Tool Kit CSG’s Healthy States Initiative ß Legislator Policy Brief Trends analysis, innovative responses and expert advice ß Talking Points on critical public health issues for states. ß Reducing Colorectal Cancer: Screening, Access and Services in Minority and Underserved Communities www.healthystates.csg.org ß Sample State Legislation ß Resources Guide for State Policymakers 859.244.8000 8dadgZXiVa8Vc8Zg Published June 2007 June Published necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S. government. U.S. the of policies or position official the represent necessarily U38/CCU424348. Points of view in this document are those of the author and do not not do and author the of those are document this in view of Points U38/CCU424348. EgZkZci^c\ Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, under Cooperative Agreement Agreement Cooperative under Prevention, and Control Disease for Centers Services, Funding for this publication is provided by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Human and Health of Department U.S. the by provided is publication this for Funding National Hispanic Caucus of State Legislators. State of Caucus Hispanic National the initiative are the National Black Caucus of State Legislators and the the and Legislators State of Caucus Black National the are initiative the responses, and provide expert advice on public health issues. CSG's partners in in partners CSG's issues. health public on advice expert provide and responses, health experts to share information, analyze trends, identify innovative innovative identify trends, analyze information, share to experts health Disease Control and Prevention, state health department officials, and public public and officials, department health state Prevention, and Control Disease enterprise brings together state legislators, officials from the Centers for for Centers the from officials legislators, state together brings enterprise to help state leaders make informed decisions on public health issues. -
POVERTY and OPPORTUNITY: STATE GOVERNMENT TASK FORCES MEMBER COMPOSITION and OPERATIONS
March 2011 POVERTY and OPPORTUNITY: STATE GOVERNMENT TASK FORCES MEMBER COMPOSITION AND OPERATIONS round the nation, state governments have established task forces economic diversity among the membership, such as including a or commissions to develop new strategies and recommendations member with personal experience of or currently living in poverty; A for tackling poverty and providing opportunity. Managed others also specified other diversities. Representatives of the business effectively, the high-level attention of a task force created by a communities and economic development were included in more than a governor or legislature is an important step toward building the third of the task forces. Some commissions augmented the core group political and public will that is essential for policy change. with working groups, advisory groups or subcommittees made up of issue experts and public members. As legislators or governors move forward in establishing a task force, some early questions include who should be on the task force and how After the table of authorizing language is a summary of some of the will the work of the task force itself get funded. The following chart funding and staffing support for the state task forces. This isn’t a lists the composition of the 21 tasks forces established since 2003. comprehensive review of operational supports. The majority of the Some of these are on-going; others have completed their work. The task forces didn’t have explicit funding in their authorizing language, chart is followed by the full authorizing language. The composition of but many of them were able to receive staff support in kind and the task forces ranged from being at the discretion of the Governor to outside funding through public-private partnerships. -
151St General Assembly Legislative Guide 151St General Assembly Legislative Guide
151st General Assembly Legislative Guide 151st General Assembly Legislative Guide Senate – Table of Contents …………………………….…………………………...…….. i House of Representatives – Table of Contents ..….……………………..…….…...… ii General Assembly Email and Phone Directory ……………………………………..... iv Senate – Legislative Profiles ………………………………………………...………….... 1 House of Representatives – Legislative Profiles …..……………..……………….... 23 Delaware Cannabis Advocacy Network P.O. Box 1625 Dover, DE 19903 (302) 404-4208 [email protected] 151st General Assembly – Delaware State Senate DISTRICT AREA SENATOR PAGE District 1 Wilmington North Sarah McBride (D) 2 District 2 Wilmington East Darius Brown (D) 3 District 3 Wilmington West Elizabeth Lockman (D) 4 District 4 Greenville, Hockessin Laura Sturgeon (D) 5 Heatherbrooke, District 5 Kyle Evans Gay (D) 6 Talleyville District 6 Lewes Ernesto B. Lopez (R) 7 District 7 Elsmere Spiros Mantzavinos (D) 8 District 8 Newark David P. Sokola (D) 9 District 9 Stanton John Walsh (D) 10 District 10 Middletown Stephanie Hansen (D) 11 District 11 Newark Bryan Townsend (D) 12 District 12 New Castle Nicole Poore (D) 13 District 13 Wilmington Manor Marie Pinkney (D) 14 District 14 Smyrna Bruce C. Ennis (D) 15 District 15 Marydel David G. Lawson (D) 16 District 16 Dover South Colin R.J. Bonini (R) 17 District 17 Dover, Central Kent Trey Paradee (D) 18 District 18 Milford David L. Wilson (R) 19 District 19 Georgetown Brian Pettyjohn (R) 20 District 20 Ocean View Gerald W. Hocker (R) 21 District 21 Laurel Bryant L. Richardson (R) 22 151st General Assembly – Delaware House of Representatives DISTRICT AREA REPRESENTATIVE PAGE District 1 Wilmington North Nnamdi Chukquocha (D) 24 District 2 Wilmington East Stephanie T. Bolden (D) 25 District 3 Wilmington South Sherry Dorsey Walker (D) 26 District 4 Wilmington West Gerald L. -
DELAWARE GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE of DELAWARE May 6, 2021 Senator Thomas R. Carper 513 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC 2
DELAWARE GENERAL ASSEMBLY STATE OF DELAWARE LEGISLATIVE HALL DOVER, DELAWARE 19901 May 6, 2021 Senator Thomas R. Carper 513 Hart Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510 Senator Christopher A. Coons 218 Russell Senate Office Building Washington DC 20510 Representative Lisa Blunt Rochester 1724 Longworth House Office Building Washington, D.C. 20515 Dear Delaware Congressional Delegation: Representation is at the very heart of what we as elected officials do: We represent constituents. We represent their issues, concerns, beliefs and interests, and we take action on their behalf. It is a basic function of government that ensures that all residents have a voice in the decisions that impact their lives. But for 712,000 American citizens living just 90 miles away, representation has been denied, despite their repeated requests to be made whole. The residents of Washington, D.C., live just footsteps from the seat of the United States government, but they have no say in the public policy that is enacted there. Despite District of Columbia residents endorsing statehood via a district-wide referendum in 2016 by 86 percent, Congress has refused to take action. We write to fully endorse and support S.51, legislation from Senator Carper that would establish Washington, D.C., as the 51st state in our union. We thank Senator Coons and Representative Blunt Rochester for their support of this important and historic legislation, and we urge you to act decisively to ensure that these Americans’ voices are heard and represented. By making the District of Columbia a state, Congress will finally give District citizens full voting representation in our government, which will also give them control of their local affairs. -
Prayer Practices
Floor Action 5-145 Prayer Practices Legislatures operate with a certain element of pomp, ceremony and procedure that flavor the institution with a unique air of tradition and theatre. The mystique of the opening ceremonies and rituals help to bring order and dignity to the proceedings. One of these opening ceremonies is the offering of a prayer. Use of legislative prayer. The practice of opening legislative sessions with prayer is long- standing. The custom draws its roots from both houses of the British Parliament, which, according to noted parliamentarian Luther Cushing, from time ”immemorial” began each day with a “reading of the prayers.” In the United States, this custom has continued without interruption at the federal level since the first Congress under the Constitution (1789) and for more than a century in many states. Almost all state legislatures still use an opening prayer as part of their tradition and procedure (see table 02-5.50). In the Massachusetts Senate, a prayer is offered at the beginning of floor sessions for special occasions. Although the use of an opening prayer is standard practice, the timing of when the prayer occurs varies (see table 02-5.51). In the majority of legislative bodies, the prayer is offered after the floor session is called to order, but before the opening roll call is taken. Prayers sometimes are given before floor sessions are officially called to order; this is true in the Colorado House, Nebraska Senate and Ohio House. Many chambers vary on who delivers the prayer. Forty-seven chambers allow people other than the designated legislative chaplain or a visiting chaplain to offer the opening prayer (see table 02-5.52). -
1.21.20 Orientation Minutes Final
Sen. S. Elizabeth Lockman, Co-Chair Rep. David Bentz, Chair Sen. Anthony Delcollo Rep. Andria L. Bennett Sen. Stephanie L. Hansen Rep. Sherry Dorsey Walker Sen. Ernesto Lopez Rep. Jeffrey N. Spiegelman Sen. John Walsh Rep. Lyndon D. Yearick STATE OF DELAWARE JOINT LEGISLATIVE OVERSIGHT AND SUNSET COMMITTEE Orientation Minutes – January 21, 2020 1 Chair Bentz called the meeting to order at 12:02 p.m. Committee members present included 2 Co-Chair Lockman; Representatives Bennett, Dorsey Walker, Spiegelman, and Yearick; Senators 3 Delcollo, Hansen, Lopez, and Walsh. Staff present included Mark Brainard, Jr. and Amanda 4 McAtee, JLOSC Analysts; Holly Vaughn Wagner, Legislative Attorney for the JLOSC and 5 Deputy Director of the Division of Research; Natalie White, Administrative Specialist; Jeff 6 Chubbs, Legislative Fellow. A quorum was met. 7 Chair Bentz welcomed the members of the committee to the orientation meeting for the Joint 8 Legislative Oversight and Sunset Committee (“JLOSC”) of the 150th General Assembly, Second 9 Session, and called for Committee and staff introductions. Amanda McAtee introduced two new 10 employees present to observe the committee, Joel Rudnick, Legislative Librarian, and Cara 11 Wilson, legislative drafting attorney for the Division of Research. 12 Chair Bentz moved to item 3 on the Agenda, the approval of the June 13, 2019 meeting minutes. 13 Representative Spiegelman motioned to approve the June 13, 2019 minutes as written, and 14 Representative Yearick seconded the motion. The motion carried 8-0, with Senators Lockman, 15 Hansen, Lopez, and Walsh, and Representatives Bentz, Bennett, Spiegelman, and Yearick, voting 16 in favor, no opposed, 2 not present at the time of the vote, Representative Dorsey Walker and 17 Senator Delcollo. -
Chief Justices of the Delaware Supreme Court in Support of Petitioner ______
No. 19-309 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ___________ JOHN C. CARNEY, GOVERNOR OF DELAWARE, Petitioner, v. JAMES R. ADAMS, Respondent. ___________ On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit ___________ BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE FORMER CHIEF JUSTICES OF THE DELAWARE SUPREME COURT IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER ___________ VIRGINIA A. SEITZ* KATHLEEN MORIARTY MUELLER SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 1501 K Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005 (202) 736-8000 [email protected] Counsel for Amici Curiae January 24, 2020 * Counsel of Record TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ................................. ii INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE .......................... 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT .............................. 3 ARGUMENT ......................................................... 6 I. OUR CONSTITUTIONAL TRADITION EMBRACES THE SELECTION OF JUDGES BASED ON PARTY AFFILIA- TION .............................................................. 6 II. DELAWARE’S CHOSEN JUDICIAL- SELECTION PROCESS IS CONSTITU- TIONAL ......................................................... 12 A. Delaware’s Judicial-Selection Process Is Within Its Authority As A Sovereign And Has Produced An Excellent Judiciary ..... 12 B. This Court’s Decisions In Elrod And Branti Confirm The Constitutionality Of Delaware’s Judicial-Selection Process ..... 16 CONCLUSION ..................................................... 20 (i) ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES Page Branti v. Finkel, 445 U.S. 507 (1980) ................................................ -
Senate Environmental, Natural Resources & Energy Committee
Senate Environmental, Natural Resources & Energy Committee Meeting Official Minutes 149th General Assembly Second Session Committee Meeting Wednesday June 6th, 2018 1:30 p.m. Senate Chamber Meeting Room Meeting Attendance Committee Members: Present: Senator Harris McDowell [email protected] 302-744-4147 Senator Stephanie Hansen [email protected] 302-744-4138 Senator Jack Walsh [email protected] 302-744-4163 Senator Ernesto Lopez [email protected] 302-744-4136 Senator Gerald Hocker [email protected] 302-744-4144 Staff: Anthony Bernadzikowski [email protected] 302-744-4269 Attendees: Organization: Phone: Paul Norrill Committee of 100 Mike Riemann ACEC/HBA Bobby Horsey David Horsey and Sons 1 Mike Scuse Department of Agriculture Rick Armitage DRA Bob Palmer DNREC David Sodeikis DNREC Rob Hosster DNREC Robert Tunnel III Tunnel Co. Jeff Hague DSSA Scott Kidner Bruce Ennis Delaware State Senate Agenda: Senator McDowell brought the meeting to order at 1:05 pm. Senator Walsh then called for a motion to accept the minutes of the previous meeting on May 9th, 2018. The motion was seconded and received unanimous approval from members of the committee. SB 204 (Hocker) – AN ACT TO AMEND TITLE 26 OF THE DELAWARE CODE RELATING TO STORMWATER MANAGEMENT. Synopsis: Section 1 through 4 of this Act establish interim standards and criteria in order to permit redevelopment projects to move forward while revised regulations are being drafted. The interim standards set forth in this Act would effectively "sunset" upon the adoption of regulations governing redevelopment. The redevelopment regulations, upon formal adoption, would supersede the provisions of the Bill. -
Norfolk Southern Corporation Contributions
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION CONTRIBUTIONS TO CANDIDATES AND POLITICAL COMMITTEES JANUARY 1 ‐ DECEMBER 31, 2018* STATE RECIPIENT OF CORPORATE POLITICAL FUNDS AMOUNT DATE ELECTION OFFICE OR COMMITTEE TYPE IN Eric Holcomb $1,000 01/18/2018 Primary 2018 Governor US National Governors Association $30,000 01/31/2018 N/A 2018 Association Conf. Acct. SC South Carolina House Republican Caucus $3,500 02/14/2018 N/A 2018 State Party Cmte SC South Carolina Republican Party (State Acct) $1,000 02/14/2018 N/A 2018 State Party Cmte SC Senate Republican Caucus Admin Fund $3,500 02/14/2018 N/A 2018 State Party Non‐Fed Admin Acct SC Alan Wilson $500 02/14/2018 Primary 2018 State Att. General SC Lawrence K. Grooms $1,000 03/19/2018 Primary 2020 State Senate US Democratic Governors Association (DGA) $10,000 03/19/2018 N/A 2018 Association US Republican Governors Association (RGA) $10,000 03/19/2018 N/A 2018 Association GA Kevin Tanner $1,000 04/16/2018 Primary 2018 State House GA David Ralston $1,000 04/16/2018 Primary 2018 State House IN Ryan Hatfield $750 04/16/2018 Primary 2018 State House IN Gregory Steuerwald $500 04/16/2018 Primary 2018 State House IN Karen Tallian $750 04/16/2018 Primary 2018 State Senate IN Blake Doriot $750 04/16/2018 Primary 2020 State Senate IN Dan Patrick Forestal $750 04/16/2018 Primary 2018 State House GA Bill Werkheiser $400 04/26/2018 Primary 2018 State House GA Deborah Silcox $400 04/26/2018 Primary 2018 State House GA Frank Ginn $500 04/26/2018 Primary 2018 State Senate GA John LaHood $500 04/26/2018 Primary 2018 State -
2019 Monoblogue Accountability Project Delaware Edition
2019 monoblogue Accountability Project Delaware Edition A voting summary for the Delaware General Assembly ©2019 Michael Swartz. Reprint permission is granted with credit to “Michael Swartz at monoblogue” (with link) Introduction I began the monoblogue Accountability Project in 2008 to grade all 188 members of the Maryland General Assembly on whether they voted in what the author considered a conservative manner or not. But in 2017 I decided to add a Delaware edition which would grade the First State's 62 legislators in a similar manner to how I rated the Maryland General Assembly because I was working in the state at the time. After the 2018 session I retired the original Maryland edition, but since my wife and I have subsequently invested in Delaware through the purchase of our house I’m now making this Delaware edition an annual guide. Like my previous Delaware editions, I will do floor votes on 25 separate bills of interest that had both House and Senate votes. Legislators are listed in alphabetical order, which makes it easy to compile votes because the tally sheets are somewhat (as I'll explain later) alphabetical in Delaware. Thus far since the 2018 election there has not been turnover in the Delaware General Assembly so all are graded on 25 votes. The method to my madness The next portion of the monoblogue Accountability Project explains why votes are tabulated as they are. The first few pages will cover the bills I used for this year’s monoblogue Accountability Project and the rationale for my determining whether a vote is “right” or “wrong.” 25 floor votes are tallied, and there is a perfect possible score of 100 for getting all 25 votes correct: a correct vote is worth four points and an incorrect vote is worth none. -
Electronic Voting
Short Report: Electronic Voting 15 SR 001 Date: April 13, 2015 by: Matthew Sackett, Research Manager TABLE OF CONTENTS Part I: Introduction Part II: General Overview of Electronic Voting Systems Part III: Summary of National Conference of State Legislatures Research on Electronic Voting (Survey) Part IV: Wyoming Legislature’s process and procedures relating to vote taking and recording Part V: Conclusion Attachments: Attachment A: NCSL Survey Results WYOMING LEGISLATIVE SERVICE OFFICE • 213 State Capitol • Cheyenne, Wyoming 82002 TELEPHONE (307) 777-7881 • FAX (307) 777-5466 • EMAIL • [email protected] • WEBSITE http://legisweb.state.wy.us Page 2 PART I: INTRODUCTION As part of the Capitol renovation process, the Select Committee on Legislative Technology asked LSO staff to prepare an update to a report that was done for them previously (2008) about electronic voting systems. The previous report included as its main focus a survey conducted by the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) to other states that asked a variety of questions on electronic voting both in terms of equipment and legislative procedures. For purposes of this update, LSO again reached out to Ms. Brenda Erickson, a staff specialist knowledgeable in the areas of electronic voting and voting process and procedure from NCSL, to again conduct a survey related to process and procedure of other states related to electronic voting. Before engaging in a discussion of electronic voting systems, it is important to recognize that electronic voting systems are tools for facilitating legislative business. These systems are subject to legislative rules, processes and procedures. It is the implementation, and subsequent enforcement, of legislative rules and procedures related to voting process, not just the systems technology, which create accountability in the process. -
Norfolk Southern Corporation Contributions to Candidates and Political Committees January 1 ‐ December 30, 2020*
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION CONTRIBUTIONS TO CANDIDATES AND POLITICAL COMMITTEES JANUARY 1 ‐ DECEMBER 30, 2020* STATE RECIPIENT OF CORPORATE POLITICAL FUNDS AMOUNT DATE ELECTION OFFICE OR COMMITTEE IL Eva Dina Delgado $1,000 01/27/2020 Primary 2020 State House US Democratic Governors Association (DGA) $10,000 01/27/2020 Election Cycle 2020 Association IL Pat McGuire $250 01/30/2020 Other 2019 State Senate SC SC Rep Senate Caucus (Admin Fund) $3,500 02/18/2020 N/A 2020 State Party Non‐Fed Admin Acct US Republican Governors Association (RGA) $10,000 02/18/2020 N/A 2020 Association LA Stuart Bishop $500 03/03/2020 Primary 2023 Statewide ‐TBD LA Ryan Bourriaque $250 03/03/2020 Primary 2023 State House LA Rhonda Butler $250 03/03/2020 Primary 2023 State House LA Robby Carter $250 03/03/2020 Primary 2023 State House LA Heather Cloud $500 03/03/2020 Primary 2023 State Senate LA Patrick Page Cortez $500 03/03/2020 Primary 2023 Statewide ‐TBD LA Mary DuBuisson $250 03/03/2020 Primary 2023 State House LA Michael Echols $250 03/03/2020 Primary 2023 State House LA Julie Emerson $250 03/03/2020 Primary 2023 State House LA Raymond Garofalo $250 03/03/2020 Primary 2023 Statewide ‐TBD LA Charles Henry $250 03/03/2020 Primary 2023 State House LA Sharon Hewitt $500 03/03/2020 Primary 2023 State Senate LA Stephanie Hilferty $250 03/03/2020 Primary 2023 State House LA Valarie Hodges $250 03/03/2020 Primary 2023 Statewide ‐TBD LA Paul Hollis $250 03/03/2020 Primary 2023 Statewide ‐TBD LA Ronnie Johns $500 03/03/2020 Primary 2023 Statewide ‐TBD LA Tim Kerner