View Daily Order Paper PDF File 0.03 MB
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Brexit Update Research Briefing
National Assembly for Wales Senedd Research Brexit Update Research Briefing September 2018 www.assembly.wales/research The National Assembly for Wales is the democratically elected body that represents the interests of Wales and its people, makes laws for Wales, agrees Welsh taxes and holds the Welsh Government to account. An electronic copy of this document can be found on the National Assembly website: www.assembly.wales/research Copies of this document can also be obtained in accessible formats including Braille, large print, audio or hard copy from: Research Service National Assembly for Wales Tŷ Hywel Cardiff Bay CF99 1NA Tel: 0300 200 6219 Email: [email protected] Twitter: @SeneddResearch Blog: SeneddResearch.blog © National Assembly for Wales Commission Copyright 2018 The text of this document may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing that it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading or derogatory context. The material must be acknowledged as copyright of the National Assembly for Wales Commission and the title of the document specified. National Assembly for Wales Senedd Research Brexit Update Research Briefing September 2018 Author: Nigel Barwise Date: 17 September 2018 Paper number: 18-049 www.assembly.wales/research Research Briefing: Brexit Update Contents Introduction..........................................................................................1 Developments in Wales.................................................................... 2 National Assembly for Wales -
Making a Hasty Brexit? Ministerial Turnover and Its Implications
Making a Hasty Brexit? Ministerial Turnover and Its Implications Jessica R. Adolino, Ph. D. Professor of Political Science James Madison University Draft prepared for presentation at the European Studies Association Annual Meeting May 9-12, 2019, Denver, Colorado Please do not cite or distribute without author’s permission. By almost any measure, since the immediate aftermath of the June 16, 2016 Brexit referendum, the British government has been in a state of chaos. The turmoil began with then- Prime Minister David Cameron’s resignation on June 17 and succession by Theresa May within days of the vote. Subsequently, May’s decision to call a snap election in 2017 and the resulting loss of the Conservatives’ parliamentary majority cast doubt on her leadership and further stirred up dissension in her party’s ranks. Perhaps more telling, and the subject of this paper, is the unprecedented number of ministers1—from both senior and junior ranks—that quit the May government over Brexit-related policy disagreements2. Between June 12, 2017 and April 3, 2019, the government witnessed 45 resignations, with high-profile secretaries of state and departmental ministers stepping down to return to the backbenches. Of these, 34 members of her government, including 9 serving in the Cabinet, departed over issues with some aspect of Brexit, ranging from dissatisfaction with the Prime Minister’s Withdrawal Agreement, to disagreements about the proper role of Parliament, to questions about the legitimacy of the entire Brexit process. All told, Theresa May lost more ministers, and at a more rapid pace, than any other prime minister in modern times. -
Uk Government and Special Advisers
UK GOVERNMENT AND SPECIAL ADVISERS April 2019 Housing Special Advisers Parliamentary Under Parliamentary Under Parliamentary Under Parliamentary Under INTERNATIONAL 10 DOWNING Toby Lloyd Samuel Coates Secretary of State Secretary of State Secretary of State Secretary of State Deputy Chief Whip STREET DEVELOPMENT Foreign Affairs/Global Salma Shah Rt Hon Tobias Ellwood MP Kwasi Kwarteng MP Jackie Doyle-Price MP Jake Berry MP Christopher Pincher MP Prime Minister Britain James Hedgeland Parliamentary Under Parliamentary Under Secretary of State Chief Whip (Lords) Rt Hon Theresa May MP Ed de Minckwitz Olivia Robey Secretary of State INTERNATIONAL Parliamentary Under Secretary of State and Minister for Women Stuart Andrew MP TRADE Secretary of State Heather Wheeler MP and Equalities Rt Hon Lord Taylor Chief of Staff Government Relations Minister of State Baroness Blackwood Rt Hon Penny of Holbeach CBE for Immigration Secretary of State and Parliamentary Under Mordaunt MP Gavin Barwell Special Adviser JUSTICE Deputy Chief Whip (Lords) (Attends Cabinet) President of the Board Secretary of State Deputy Chief of Staff Olivia Oates WORK AND Earl of Courtown Rt Hon Caroline Nokes MP of Trade Rishi Sunak MP Special Advisers Legislative Affairs Secretary of State PENSIONS JoJo Penn Rt Hon Dr Liam Fox MP Parliamentary Under Laura Round Joe Moor and Lord Chancellor SCOTLAND OFFICE Communications Special Adviser Rt Hon David Gauke MP Secretary of State Secretary of State Lynn Davidson Business Liason Special Advisers Rt Hon Amber Rudd MP Lord Bourne of -
THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim
THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84. -
Political Affairs Digest a Daily Summary of Political Events Affecting the Jewish Community Scottish Council of Jewish Communities
13 June 2017 Issue 1,454 Political Affairs Digest A daily summary of political events affecting the Jewish Community Scottish Council of Jewish Communities SCoJeC Contents Home Affairs Consultations Israel Home Affairs Downing Street: Ministerial Appointments Ministers of State Home Office Nick Hurd Ministry of Justice Dominic Raab Department for Education Anne Milton Robert Goodwill Department for Exiting the European Union Baroness Anelay Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Claire Perry HM Treasury: Financial Secretary Mel Stride Foreign and Commonwealth Office Lord Ahmad of Wimbledon Mark Field Department for Communities and Local Government Alok Sharma Ministry of Defence Mark Lancaster (Joint) Department for International Development & Foreign and Commonwealth Office Alistair Burt (Joint) Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy & Department for Education Jo Johnson Department for Education Nick Gibb 1 Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs George Eustice Department of Health Philip Dunne Foreign and Commonwealth Office Alan Duncan Home Office Ben Wallace Baroness Williams of Trafford Department for Culture Media and Sport Matt Hancock Department for International Trade Greg Hands (and also Minister for London) Lord Price Department for Transport John Hayes (Joint) Department for International Development & Foreign and Commonwealth Office Rory Stewart Department for International Development Lord Bates Department for Work and Pensions Damian Hinds Penny Mordaunt Ministry of Defence Earl -
Appointment of HM Chief Inspector of Prisons
House of Commons Justice Committee Appointment of HM Chief Inspector of Prisons Eighth Report of Session 2019–21 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 15 September 2020 HC 750 Published on 17 September 2020 by authority of the House of Commons Justice Committee The Justice Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration and policy of the Ministry of Justice and its associated public bodies (including the work of staff provided for the administrative work of courts and tribunals, but excluding consideration of individual cases and appointments, and excluding the work of the Scotland and Wales Offices and of the Advocate General for Scotland); and administration and expenditure of the Attorney General’s Office, the Treasury Solicitor’s Department, the Crown Prosecution Service and the Serious Fraud Office (but excluding individual cases and appointments and advice given within government by Law Officers). Current membership Sir Robert Neill MP (Conservative, Bromley and Chislehurst) (Chair) Paula Barker MP (Labour, Liverpool, Wavertree) Richard Burgon MP (Labour, Leeds East) Rob Butler MP (Conservative, Aylesbury) James Daly MP (Conservative. Bury North) Sarah Dines MP (Conservative, Derbyshire Dales) Maria Eagle MP (Labour, Garston and Halewood) John Howell MP (Conservative, Henley) Kenny MacAskill MP (Scottish National Party, East Lothian) Kieran Mullan MP (Conservative, Crewe and Nantwich) Andy Slaughter MP (Labour, Hammersmith) The following were also Members of the Committee during this session. Ellie Reeves MP (Labour, Lewisham West and Penge) and Ms Marie Rimmer MP (Labour, St Helens South and Whiston) Powers © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2019. -
Magistrates Survey
Independent Advisory Panel on Deaths in Custody and Chair: Juliet Lyon CBE Head of Secretariat: Andrew Fraser 27 June 2019 www.independent.gov.uk/iapdeathsincustody The Rt Hon David Gauke MP Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice Dear Secretary of State, Effective community sentences and the role treatment requirements can play in preventing deaths in custody On behalf of the Independent Advisory Panel on Deaths in Custody (IAP) and the Magistrates Association (MA), we are writing to ask you and your Ministerial colleagues to consider the findings and recommendations of a survey we have recently conducted of magistrates’ views on sentencing powers and practice in relation to offenders with mental health conditions, learning disabilities and other needs. This joint investigation by the IAP and MA is prompted by concerns about unmet mental health needs, the worrying rise of self-inflicted deaths in custody and exceptionally high levels of self-harm. According to your Ministry figures, 23% of men and 46% of women in custody have attempted suicide at some point in their lives compared to 6% of the general population. Yet despite this indicator of risk and vulnerability we note that, of the 75,750 community orders made last year, fewer than 1% (just 458) included a mental health treatment requirement. The focus of our survey was on community sentences as an alternative to custody. We appreciate this is an area of particular interest to you and your colleagues – given the recent announcement of the extension of the Community Sentence Treatment pilots, which we welcome. We hope that this pre-publication copy will be of assistance in your work to strengthen such sentences and ensure their effectiveness. -
The Case for Real Capitalism by Jesse Norman, Member of Parliament for Hereford and South Herefordshire Contents
making the case for free enterprise The Case for Real Capitalism by Jesse Norman, Member of Parliament for Hereford and South Herefordshire Contents Executive Summary 1. The Case for Capitalism 2. Crony Capitalism 3. The Case of Goldman Sachs 4. Lloyds HBOS and the UK banks 5. Pay 6. The UK’s Real Economic Decline 7. Institutions: AWOL or MIA? 8. The Politics of Crony Capitalism 9. Free Market Conservatism 10. Lessons About the author Jesse Norman is the MP for Hereford and South Herefordshire, and a member of the Treasury Select Committee. He is a former Director of BZW, which he left in 1997; and of Institutional Shareholder Services, now the leading provider of corporate governance advice worldwide. Executive summary • Capitalism is the greatest tool of wealth creation, social advance and economic development ever known.* • We are living through a period of crony capitalism, of which the Goldman Sachs flotation and Lloyds-HBOS merger are just two examples. • Conservatives must make the moral case for real capitalism, and take action against crony capitalism — and the culture that created it. * Please note a longer version of this paper is in preparation. 1. The Case for Capitalism The US economy is stagnating. The Eurozone is in crisis. The UK may be dragged back into recession. This crisis is not a mere economic downturn, but a fundamental shift of value, caused by excessive financial speculation and abetted by foolish political decision-making over two decades. Capitalism itself is widely held to be at fault. In fact capitalism is the greatest tool of economic development, wealth creation and so- cial advance ever known. -
Chair to Lord Callanan
House of Lords Tel: 020 7219 1228 London [email protected] Select Committee on the Constitution SW1A 0PW www.parliament.uk/lords Rt. Hon Robert Buckland QC MP 11 September 2020 Lord Chancellor Ministry of Justice 102 Petty France London SW1H 9AJ Dear Lord Chancellor, Rule of law and the UK Internal Market Bill I write on behalf of the Constitution Committee regarding our concerns about the rule of law implications of the UK Internal Market Bill. The Bill proposes ministerial powers to allow the Government to depart from the terms of the Withdrawal Agreement with the European Union. As the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland confirmed in the House of Commons, it permits the Government to break international law. Whether that breach is “specific and limited” or not is irrelevant. Any breach of international law threatens to undermine confidence in future treaty commitments made by the UK Government and increases the likelihood that the governments of other countries will breach their international law obligations. Those practical consequences are of great significance. The proposed course of action also appears to be in tension with the constitutional principle of the rule of law and we write to you in that connection. Established international law on treaty modification, termination and withdrawal is clear. The UK is a party to the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, which although applicable for treaties between states, nevertheless outlines several core rules that are broadly considered to reflect customary international law. Articles 61 and 62 of the Vienna Convention set out the narrow grounds on which states may be entitled to exercise a right of withdrawal from a treaty, in each case subject to the procedural requirements set out in Articles 65–68. -
The Rt Hon Robert Buckland QC MP Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice Ministry of Justice 102 Petty France London SW1H 9AJ
Prison Reform Trust 15 Northburgh Street 1 Ardleigh Road London EC1V 0JR London N1 4HS Tel: 020 7251 5070 Tel: +44 (0)20 7249 7373 Email: [email protected] www.prisonreformtrust.org.uk Web: www.howardleague.org The Rt Hon Robert Buckland QC MP Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice Ministry of Justice 102 Petty France London SW1H 9AJ 9 November 2020 Dear Lord Chancellor, COVID-19 and prisons: the next phase We wrote to you on 13 October on this subject and, whilst we understand the pressures on your department, we are disappointed not to have received a reply. The statement on the MoJ website published on 6 November, and the message to stakeholders from Dr Jo Farrar briefly summarising the HMPPS response to the national lockdown in England are both helpful and show the attention that some of the issues we raised have clearly been receiving. We welcome the continuation of phone credit for prisoners, and the availability in most though not all prisons of video calling technology. We hope that the introduction of more testing and the wider use of PPE for both staff and prisoners will allow the day to day regime to be a little less oppressive than it was in the spring and much of the summer for most prisoners. However, the other issues on which we sought a response are still of crucial importance to prisoners and their families. It would demonstrate a commitment to transparency, and we hope reassure those people, if you were now able to respond to our letter. -
View Daily Order Paper PDF File 0.03 MB
Wednesday 14 April 2021 Order Paper No.199: Part 1 SUMMARY AGENDA: CHAMBER 11.30am Prayers Afterwards Oral Questions: President of COP26 12 noon Oral Questions: Prime Minister 12.30pm Ministerial Statements (if any) Up to 20 minutes Ten Minute Rule Motion: NHS Pay Award (Report) (Carolyn Harris) Until 7.00pm Opposition Day (19th allotted day): Committee to investigate the lobbying of Government The strength of the UK’s armed forces No debate Statutory Instrument (Motion for approval) No debate Church of England (General Synod) Measures (Motions for approval) No debate Presentation of Public Petitions Until 7.30pm or for Adjournment Debate: Funding for the restoration of half an hour Hammersmith Bridge (Fleur Anderson) WESTMINSTER HALL No Westminster Hall debates have been scheduled for 14 April (Order of 25 February) as the Public Bill Committee for the Advanced Research and Invention Agency Bill is expected to be sitting. 2 Wednesday 14 April 2021 OP No.199: Part 1 CONTENTS CONTENTS PART 1: BUSINESS TODAY 3 Chamber 8 Westminster Hall 9 Written Statements 10 Committees Meeting Today 15 Committee Reports Published Today 16 Announcements 20 Further Information PART 2: FUTURE BUSINESS 22 A. Calendar of Business 29 B. Remaining Orders and Notices Notes: Item marked [R] indicates that a member has declared a relevant interest. Wednesday 14 April 2021 OP No.199: Part 1 BUSINESS Today: CHAMBER 3 BUSINESS TODAY: CHAMBER Virtual participation in proceedings will commence after Prayers. 11.30am Prayers Followed by QUESTIONS 1. President of COP26 2. Prime Minister The call list for Members participating is available on the House of Commons business papers pages. -
The Rt. Honourable Boris Johnson, MP Prime Minister 10 Downing
The Rt. Honourable Boris Johnson, MP 16-17 Walkden House Prime Minister Devonshire Square 10 Downing Street London London EC2M 4SQ SW1A 2AA The Rt. Hon Robert Buckland QC, MP 11 September 2020 Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice Ministry of Justice 102 Petty France SW1H 9AJ Dear Prime Minister and Secretary of State Re: Accommodation for prison leavers and the Comprehensive Spending Review We are writing as senior leaders of voluntary organisations across the justice, health, housing and homelessness sectors to call on the UK Government to commit to ensuring that everyone leaving prison has somewhere to live. This should be safe and secure accommodation which provides a foundation for them to make positive changes and move away from a life of crime. For people leaving prison, being released homeless is simply setting them up to fail. We believe it is time to ensure that all prison leavers have a place to live upon release. We all know how important having a safe and secure home is. But for too many people leaving prison this has seemed an impossible dream for too long. Almost 1,000 people are released from prison homeless every month, and it is estimated that over 30% of rough sleepers have been in prison. Having nowhere to live holds people back from accessing support, getting a job, or moving on in their lives. And for people released homeless, the risk of committing another crime is significantly higher. Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Probation recently confirmed that the proportion of service users recalled or resentenced to custody within 12 months of release was almost double for those without settled accommodation in a sample of cases they looked at.