Savannah ter Horst Policy change in African states Case study of Botswana’s changing attitude towards the Zimbabwean crisis Savannah ter Horst Savannah ter Horst S1542605
[email protected] Final version, Bachelor thesis: International Relations and Organizations Leiden University Supervisor: Dr. Kleistra Wordcount: 8257 June 12, 2017 Savannah ter Horst Dr. Yvonne Kleistra S1542605 Bachelor thesis: International Relations Word count: 8257 Deadline final version: 12th June 2017 Policy change in African States: a case study of Botswana’s changing attitude towards the Zimbabwean crisis Abstract In 2008 Botswana changed its attitude towards the Zimbabwean crisis in the media. They took a firm stand against the violations of obligations by Zimbabwe. This was a unique position as no other African nation had publicly condemned the actions of Zimbabwe. The international community has pressured South African Development Community (SADC) members, South Africa and Botswana in particular, to raise sanctions against Zimbabwe but for the past few years the SADC and the African Union have declined to intervene in this crisis. This thesis presents a model based on the four sources that influence policy change identified by Hermann (1990): presidentialism, the bureaucratic elite, one-party dominance and dependence on foreign aid. Four corresponding hypotheses are examined for the case of Botswana which yield an insight into policy change on the African continent. Results identify centralization of power and dependence on aid as sources that influence the decision-making process and can lead to foreign policy change. For the other two sources required information was not available to reach a firm conclusion. Introduction As ruled by president Robert Mugabe and his right-wing party ZANU-PF, Zimbabwe has had significant problems with respect to their economy, the violation of human rights, corruption and the quality of their elections (Palloti, 2013, p.