DOCSLIB.ORG

County Court of Victoria 85.36 Kb

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
County Court of Victoria 85.36 Kb PARLIAMENT OF VICTORIA LAW REFORM COMMITTEE Members Present Mr M. Thompson Mr D. Davis Mr A. McIntosh Mr T. Languiller Mr P. Katsambanis Also Present Ms P. Raman, Executive Officer/Director of Research, Parliament of Victoria Law Reform Committee Ms S. Vohra, Research Officer, Parliament of Victoria Law Reform Committee Review of Legal Services in Regional and Rural Victoria Minutes of Evidence Melbourne - 16 May 2000 Witnesses His Honour Chief Judge Glenn Waldron, AO, County Court of Victoria Mr Findlay McRae Registrar, County Court of Victoria Mr James Hartnett Chief Executive Officer, County Court of Victoria CHAIR - Firstly, welcome to the hearings this morning. Hansard will be taking a transcript of proceedings. We can provide names to Hansard of those that are speaking here this morning, so the provision of names will not be necessary per se. We thank you for taking the time to contribute to our hearing today. Chief Judge Waldron - I start with an apology. One final statistical detail was left off attachment B, if I could just provide that to the committee. It relates to the Melbourne statistics, so in one sense it is not immediately of concern to the committee's inquiries. CHAIR - I make one other comment, too. Half an hour has been allowed for our time this morning. If you could draw our attention to relevant aspects of your report over the 10 minutes or so and perhaps allow a little bit of time for committee members to then ask questions of you and your colleagues. Chief Judge Waldron - I was proposing to really, I hope, quite briefly make a general observation as to the County Court's involvement concerning circuit work. We would hope that when the committee has the opportunity to read the submission, that these comments which I make today may be, to a degree, superfluous. We would hope that the submission generally speaks for itself. The first thing I would wish to say is that we believe that we cannot overemphasise the importance and the success of the civil initiative, as we call it; that is, the operation of order 34A under the County Court Rules and the Crimes (Criminal Trials) Act and along with that the CLMS, the case and list management system, which the court is evolving in regard to, first, the criminal area and, ultimately, the civil area. What we would simply say is that the whole emphasis of both those initiatives - the Crimes (Criminal Trials) Act, of course, is a legislative initiative - nevertheless the court's emphasis is to be as complete and as evenhanded as we can in regard to country litigants as well as city litigants. The operation has to be moulded, of course, to the particular differences that exist in circuit cases, so far as listing of circuit cases is concerned and the like. Nevertheless, the objective - and we believe it is an objective which is being achieved - is to provide equal access to justice for country litigants to that enjoyed by their city counterparts. We have endeavoured to briefly tell the committee just what is involved in those initiatives. But I would say to you that if you wish to have those initiatives further explained, I would certainly encourage the committee to invite Judges Jones and Harbison to speak further to those initiatives, particularly Judge Jones, because the Crimes (Criminal Trials) Act having been proclaimed only from 1 September last year, it is only now that we are moving into a more positive application of that act so far as circuit matters are concerned. Frankly, we believe that the prospect of very significant improvement in control of lists and disposition of lists will result from the Crimes (Criminal Trials) Act and the CLMS initiative. As a side wind, I just think that I ought to say this: Professor Sallman and Mr Wright's report 'Going to Court' does make a reference - I have not read it extensively as yet but I have become aware of their reference - to the civil initiative. I am obliged to say that it is really quite misleading as to the success of the civil initiative. The reality is that at this point the time lines that the court has set itself - I might say that they say we have not set time lines, but indeed we have - are now being achieved. So that the future there, I think, is an encouraging one. I think it is necessary to say that when looking at the County Court's performance on circuit, the committee really will be looking substantially at the court's performance on circuit because I think it is fair to say - and if Mr McLean is still with us he will correct me later - save for murder trials, the Supreme Court substantially does not deal with criminal matters on circuit. It is in fact in the city as well that the so-called concurrent indictable jurisdiction shared between the two courts is very substantially dealt with by the County Court and has been for many years. But I think that circumstance is even more so on circuit. So that we do not complain about it but substantially the circuit load of the courts is borne by the County Court. If we are complaining at all, it is in regard to what we see as the very urgent need for more appropriate resourcing of the County Court's activities. There is a positive devolution, in both the civil initiative and the Crimes (Criminal Trials) Act procedures, of administrative responsibility on the circuit registries. That is a very positive thing and a good thing insofar as it enhances the effective contact between the registries, thus the court, and the local practitioners and local litigants; and, of course, with the local motivation from the registry staff, the administrative support is that much more effective. As the submission indicates, in a circuit or country registry the staff are beholden to three courts. The local registrar will be the deputy prothonotary in the Supreme Court, he will be a deputy registrar in the County Court and he will be the registrar and in the more populous areas the principal registrar in the Magistrates' Court. Likewise, the staff are beholden to those three jurisdictions. Nevertheless, the funding is through the Magistrates' Court. In these days of close control of court budgets, that does produce difficulties insofar as staff being able to fulfil the duties which we ask of them in regard to these initiatives that I refer to. We are proposing to endeavour to address this with government. But we do believe it is obligatory to say to this committee that the only concern we have as to the ultimate efficacy of both those initiatives is satisfactory funding at the administrative level and also, as the submission indicates, we believe it is really very much needed for a temporary increase in the numbers of the judges. Natural attrition will always, of course, account for a circumstance, which has never occurred in my time, but one can theoretically postulate a circumstance where it will be found that there are more judges than are required. Natural attrition in a large court - there are always judges retiring over a given period - will allow that to be redressed. We have made, unsuccessfully, submissions to government to temporarily have the number of judges increased. In this interregnum period in the criminal area, where we are dealing with the pre- Crimes (Criminal Trials) Act cases along with the Crimes (Criminal Trials) Act cases as well, the withdrawal of three listing judges from the trial work has had an adverse impact on the ability of the court to meet its time lines in the criminal area. That is an inhibiting factor. Of course, if government changes its view and provides those additional judges, that will all be the better. Without going to the particularity of the submission, and I hope you would not want me to do that, I think that is the overview that we would wish to give you, prior to any questions that you and your colleagues would ask of us, Mr Chairman. CHAIR - Thank you very much. Chief Judge Waldron - I am sorry, I should have said - and I should have been prompted by Mr McLean's comments when we were seated in the audience while he was making his submission to the committee - we of course do have our internet site. In fact, it was the first site outside of America to be included in the top 10 court internet sites as perceived by whoever it was who makes that judgment. We have not made much song and dance about it but the reality is that all of the things that Mr McLean was talking about, court lists and so on, that are on the Supreme Court site are on the County Court site. Having said all that, of course, the vital thing is to make effective contact between regional Victoria and the court. The judges, of course, are all housed in Melbourne but go on circuit to the circuit courts. There is the physical contact of the judges going on circuit as regularly as we can afford with the number of judges we have. Additional to that, of course, we have got the videoconferencing and the other IT links that enhance the performance. CHAIR - Thank you. I would like to invite my colleagues to pose a few questions. MR McINTOSH - Judge, in relation to country circuits, is there a problem in relation to the backlog of cases and is there a difference you can identify between city listed cases and country listed cases? Chief Judge Waldron - It varies quite markedly.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Strategic Asset Plan
    STRATEGIC ASSET PLAN DELIVERING SAFE, SECURE AND SUSTAINABLE COURT AND TRIBUNAL ASSETS VIA EXCELLENT AND EXPERT ASSET MANAGEMENT 2016–2031 Court Services Victoria acknowledges the This report may also be downloaded Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people from the Court Services Victoria website as the Traditional Custodians of the land. www.courts.vic.gov.au Court Services Victoria also acknowledges and pays respect to their Elders, past and present. Enquires Court Services Victoria This report is protected by copyright. Apart 223 William Street from any use permitted under the Copyright Act Melbourne Victoria 3000 1968 (Cth), all rights are reserved. Email: [email protected] © Court Services Victoria Published by Court Services Victoria Design: Andrew Hogg Design November 2016 Cover image: Supreme Court of Victoria Image above: Coroners Court of Victoria 1 CONTENTS 1 THE PURPOSE 2 2 THE VISION 2 3 THE SERVICE PLAN 2 4 THE KEY PRIORITIES 3 5 THE DELIVERY 3 6 THE ENVIRONMENT 3 7 THE STRATEGY 4 8 ACCESSIBLE JUSTICE THROUGHOUT VICTORIA 6 8.1 CBD 6 8.1.1 Issues 6 8.1.2 Opportunities 6 8.2 Metropolitan Melbourne 7 8.2.1 Issues 7 8.2.2 Opportunities 7 8.3 Regional Victoria 9 8.3.1 Issues 9 8.3.2 Opportunities 9 9 FUNDING 10 10 SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS 10 11 APPENDICES 12 Appendix 1 Court Services Delineation Model 12 COURT SERVICES VICTORIA STRATEGIC ASSET PLAN 2 1.0 2.0 3.0 THE THE THE PURPOSE VISION SERVICE PLAN Delivering safe, secure Court Services Victoria (CSV) aims to The Victorian courts and tribunals operate and sustainable court enable provision of accessible justice for as an interconnected network in their all Victorians through a portfolio service delivery across Victoria, from and tribunal assets via of buildings that are safe, secure and the Melbourne CBD to metropolitan and excellent and expert sustainable to meet the service needs of regional areas.
    [Show full text]
  • County Court of Victoria Annual Report
    County CouRt of VICtoRIA AnnuAl RepoRt 2008-09 This report provides a summary of the County Court’s strategic priorities, major projects and achievements for FY2008-09. mission, vALues AnD Key Achievements he County Court of Victoria (the Court) • Promote organisational excellence through represents the intermediate tier of the state’s procedural reform court hierarchy. It is the largest trial court in t • Recognise that our people are important the state of Victoria. ouR vision Key Achievements FoR 2008-09 The Court’s strategic priorities are outlined in the Our vision is to be a leader in providing a high quality, Annual Business Plan. The Court’s key achievements accessible and effi cient court system which ensures justice for 2008-09 are summarised below. for all at least cost to court users and the community. maintain judicial independence vALues • Annual seminars held to discuss the current legal The values of the judiciary are fundamental to the daily and judicial environment and to consider future work of the Court. Upon appointment, judges take an oath scenarios and their impact on Court operations of offi ce to do equal justice to all persons, to discharge the duties of offi ce according to the law and to act at all times • Ongoing professional development through to the best of their abilities without fear, favour or affection. participation in Judicial College of Victoria workshops and seminars ouR oBjectives • Universal access to Offi cers resources of Judicial The Court’s four main objectives as stated in the Court’s Offi
    [Show full text]
  • The Supreme Court of Victoria
    ANNUAL REPORT ANNUAL Annual Report Supreme Court a SUPREME COURTSUPREME OF VICTORIA 2016-17 of Victoria SUPREME COURTSUPREME OF VICTORIA ANNUAL REPORT 2016-17ANNUAL Supreme Court Annual Report of Victoria 2016-17 Letter to the Governor September 2017 To Her Excellency Linda Dessau AC, Governor of the state of Victoria and its Dependencies in the Commonwealth of Australia. Dear Governor, We, the judges of the Supreme Court of Victoria, have the honour of presenting our Annual Report pursuant to the provisions of the Supreme Court Act 1986 with respect to the financial year 1 July 2016 to 30 June 2017. Yours sincerely, Marilyn L Warren AC The Honourable Chief Justice Supreme Court of Victoria Published by the Supreme Court of Victoria Melbourne, Victoria, Australia September 2017 © Supreme Court of Victoria ISSN 1839-6062 Authorised by the Supreme Court of Victoria. This report is also published on the Court’s website: www.supremecourt.vic.gov.au Enquiries Supreme Court of Victoria 210 William Street Melbourne VIC 3000 Tel: 03 9603 6111 Email: [email protected] Annual Report Supreme Court 1 2016-17 of Victoria Contents Chief Justice foreword 2 Court Administration 49 Discrete administrative functions 55 Chief Executive Officer foreword 4 Appendices 61 Financial report 62 At a glance 5 Judicial officers of the Supreme Court of Victoria 63 About the Supreme Court of Victoria 6 2016-17 The work of the Court 7 Judicial activity 65 Contacts and locations 83 The year in review 13 Significant events 14 Work of the Supreme Court 18 The Court of Appeal 19 Trial Division – Commercial Court 23 Trial Division – Common Law 30 Trial Division – Criminal 40 Trial Division – Judicial Mediation 45 Trial Division – Costs Court 45 2 Supreme Court Annual Report of Victoria 2016-17 Chief Justice foreword It is a pleasure to present the Annual Report of the Supreme Court of Victoria for 2016-17.
    [Show full text]
  • Victoria's Legal System
    General Victoria’s legal system An introduction to the legal system in Victoria This guide has been developed to help you understand how Victoria’s legal sector works. It explains which laws apply in Victoria and who’s who in the legal sector. It will also point you in the direction of other resources if you want to know more. Find out more at... www. victorialaw foundation. org.au Contents Laws in Victoria 6 Government 26 Where do laws come from? 8 Attorney-General of Victoria 26 The Australian Constitution 8 Department of Justice and Regulation 26 Victorian and federal legislation 10 Director of Public Prosecutions and 26 the Office of Public Prosecutions Common law 10 Commonwealth Director of 28 Public Prosecutions The legal sector in Victoria 12 Victoria Police 28 Courts and tribunals 14 Australian Federal Police 28 Court Services Victoria 14 The legal profession 30 Victorian courts and tribunals 16 The profession 30 Supreme Court of Victoria 16 Solicitors 30 County Court of Victoria 16 Barristers 30 Magistrates’ Court of Victoria 18 Professional associations 30 Children’s Court of Victoria 20 Law Institute of Victoria 30 Coroners Court of Victoria 21 Victorian Bar 32 Neighbourhood Justice Centre 22 Regulating the profession 32 Victorian Civil and Administrative 23 Victorian Legal Services Board 32 Tribunal (VCAT) + Commissioner Victims of Crime Assistance Tribunal 23 Independent legal services 34 Federal courts and tribunals 24 Victoria Legal Aid 34 High Court of Australia 24 Community legal centres 34 Federal Court of Australia
    [Show full text]
  • Key Organisations
    VICTORIA OF COURT COUNTY KEY ORGANISATIONS This fact sheet gives an overview of the key organisations that work with the County Court of Victoria. There are many organisations that work with the County Court in the hearing and deciding of criminal and civil cases in its original jurisdiction and appellate jurisdiction (see Fact Sheet 1), and to ensure that members of the community who are involved in cases before the County Court receive support and assistance. Some of the organisations discussed here contribute to the work of the County Court by providing information and training to County Court judges in the performance of their duty as judicial officers. GOVERNMENT Attorney-General: the government minister who is Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions: responsible for the legal system and advising the the Office of the Commonwealth Director of Public government about reforms to the law that the County Prosecutions (headed by the Commonwealth Director) Court must apply. prosecutes criminal offences against federal laws. It is independent of government and established by the Court Services Victoria: a department in the public Parliament of Australia. Federal offences are different service that supports Victorian courts and tribunals. It is to state offences and can include offences such as drug separate to the Department of Justice and Regulation. importation, tax and social security fraud, terrorism, Court Services Victoria was established under the Court people smuggling, some sexual offences against children, Services Victoria Act 2014 (Vic). Judicial services (for and human trafficking. Commonwealth prosecutors have example, judges and magistrates) are independent of similar duties to state prosecutors.
    [Show full text]
  • Children's Court of Victoria
    CHILDREN’S COURT OF VICTORIA 477 Little Lonsdale Street, Melbourne 3000 Phone: (03) 8601 6700 Facsimile: (03) 8601 6720 CHILDREN’S COURT OF VICTORIA ANNUAL REPORT 2000 - 2001 CHILDREN’S COURT OF VICTORIA CONTENTS Year ending 30 June 2001 June 30 ending Year Financial Statement for the for Statement Financial 5 FINANCIAL STATEMENT FINANCIAL Children’s Court Information Package 17 Information Court Children’s Visits to Country Regions Country to 16 Visits 27 Research Computerisation of the Children’s Court 15 Children’s the of Computerisation 27 Education Judicial On-going The New Building New The 12 26 Sessions Information and Tours 26 Program Experience Work 2 ACHIEVEMENTS & HIGHLIGHTS & ACHIEVEMENTS Education 26 Audio/Video Linking Audio/Video 25 11 Days Sitting Court 4 GENERAL 10 Melbourne at Court Children’s Organisational Structure of the of Structure Organisational 10 Melbourne at Court Children’s the President, Magistrates and Staff of Staff and Magistrates President, Children’s Court Clinic Court Children’s 24 Victoria of Court 10 Children’s Table 13 Table the of Organisation and Structure Pre-Hearing Conferences 23 Pre-Hearing Jurisdiction 9 Tables 1-12 Tables Report President’s 4 Court Statistics Court 18 History Brief A 2 3 1 STATISTICAL REPORT STATISTICAL OVERVIEW OPERATIONAL & OPERATIONAL OPERATIONAL & 1 OVERVIEW 3 STATISTICAL REPORT Objectives, Vision, Purpose, Values 2 Court Statistics 19 President’s Report 3 Tables 1-17 Jurisdiction 10 Pre-Hearing Conferences 30 Structure and Organisation of the Table 18 Children’s Court
    [Show full text]
  • New Judicial Appointments to Magistrates’ Court
    Tuesday, 22 September 2020 NEW JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS TO MAGISTRATES’ COURT The Victorian Government today announced the appointment of Alexandra Burt, Guillaume Bailin, Kimberley Swadesir and Melissa Stead to the Magistrates’ Court of Victoria. The four new appointees bring strong and diverse experience from a wide range of practice areas and regions across Victoria. They each have a strong commitment to justice, including strengthening access to and navigating the justice system. Alexandra Burt has extensive experience across criminal and administrative law and has held positions at the Office of the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions and Victoria Legal Aid, where she worked in a variety of jurisdictions. Ms Burt was admitted as a lawyer in 2005 and holds a Bachelor of Arts and a Bachelor of Laws with Honours from the Australian National University. In 2018, she was appointed a legal member and Chairperson of the Victorian Firearms Appeals Committee. Guillaume Bailin held positions at the County Court of Victoria and the Office of Public Prosecutions has worked for Victoria Legal Aid since 2015, most recently as Acting Program Manager, Indictable Crime. Mr Bailin is the Founder and President of the Prison Legal Education and Assistance Project and has held leadership positions with the Law Institute of Victoria. Mr Bailin was admitted as a lawyer in 2010 and has held a variety of senior positions. Mr Bailin holds a Bachelor of Laws with Honours, a Bachelor of Arts and a Master of Laws (Human Rights) from Monash University. Kimberley Swadesir brings over 20 years’ experience working across the justice system and since 2002 has been a solicitor at the Office of Public Prosecutions, most recently as Managing Principal Solicitor of the Geelong branch.
    [Show full text]
  • Victorian Law Resource List Page 1
    FCAV Information Sheet – Victorian Law Resource List Page 1 VICTORIAN LAW RESOURCE LIST Family Dispute Resolution Services FAMILYFAMILY RELATIONSHIPS DISPUTE RESOLUTION ONLINE: S ERVICESwww.australia.gov.au/familyrelationships Family Relationships Online: www.familyrelationships.gov.au FAMILYFamily RELATIONSHPSRelationships Advice ADVICE Line LINE – Toll – Tollfree freenumber number 1800 0501800 321 050 321 (Mon to Fri 8.00am to 8.00pm and sat 10.00am to 4.00pm except public holidays) (Mon to Fri 8.00am to 8.00pm and sat 10.00am to 4.00pm except public holidays) Family Relationship Centres in Victoria are located at Melbourne City, Chadstone, Frankston, Broadmeadows, Ringwood, Sunshine, Shepparton, Warrnambool and Mildura. Family Relationship Frankston, Referrals to these and other family dispute services are made through the Family Relationships Advice Line above. Referrals to these and other family dispute services are made through the Family Relationships Advice Line above. FAMILY LAW COURTS OTHER COURTS & AGENCIES The Family Court of Australia and the Federal Magistrates Court of Victoria Magistrates Court of Australia are linked Courts 233 William St, Melbourne, Vic 3000 that exercise jurisdiction under the Family Law (Intervention & Family Violence Orders) Act 1975 and are jointly serviced by the Family www.magistratescourt.vic.gov.au (03) 9628 7777 Law Court Registries. County Court of Victoria Joint National Enquiries Centre 1300 352 000 250 William St, Melbourne, Vic 3000 (Adoption Matters) Joint Melbourne Fax (03) 8600 3750
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    PARLIAMENT OF VICTORIA PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY FIFTY-NINTH PARLIAMENT FIRST SESSION THURSDAY, 19 MARCH 2020 Internet: www.parliament.vic.gov.au/downloadhansard By authority of the Victorian Government Printer The Governor The Honourable LINDA DESSAU, AC The Lieutenant-Governor The Honourable KEN LAY, AO, APM The ministry Premier ........................................................ The Hon. DM Andrews, MP Deputy Premier, Minister for Education and Minister for the Coordination of Education and Training: COVID-19 ................ The Hon. JA Merlino, MP Minister for Regional Development, Minister for Agriculture and Minister for Resources The Hon. J Symes, MLC Treasurer, Minister for Economic Development, Minister for Industrial Relations and Minister for the Coordination of Treasury and Finance: COVID-19 .................................................... The Hon. TH Pallas, MP Minister for Transport Infrastructure, Minister for the Suburban Rail Loop and Minister for the Coordination of Transport: COVID-19 .... The Hon. JM Allan, MP Minister for Health, Minister for Ambulance Services and Minister for the Coordination of Health and Human Services: COVID-19 ........ The Hon. J Mikakos, MLC Minister for Public Transport and Minister for Roads and Road Safety .. The Hon. BA Carroll, MP Minister for Energy, Environment and Climate Change, and Minister for Solar Homes ................................................. The Hon. L D’Ambrosio, MP Minister for Child Protection and Minister for Disability, Ageing
    [Show full text]
  • A Quick Guide to Sentencing (6Th Edition)
    A QUICK GUIDE TO SENTENCING SENTENCING ADVISORY COUNCIL 2021 Just Punishment Rehabilitation FIVE PURPOSES Deterrence OF SENTENCING Denunciation Community Protection Published by the Sentencing Advisory Council Melbourne, Victoria, Australia © State of Victoria, Sentencing Advisory Council, 2021 This work (excluding all logos) is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. To view a copy of the licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. First published January 2015 Second edition January 2016 Third edition January 2017 Fourth edition January 2018 Fifth edition January 2019 Sixth edition January 2021 ISBN 978-1-925071-57-3 (Online) Authorised by the Sentencing Advisory Council, Level 3, 333 Queen Street, Melbourne VIC 3000 CONTENTS ABOUT THE QUICK GUIDE 1 WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SENTENCING? 1 Where is sentencing law made? 1 Parliament of Victoria 2 Parliament of Australia 3 Courts 3 WHERE DOES SENTENCING HAPPEN? 4 Magistrates’ Court, County Court, Supreme Court 4 Children’s Court 5 Specialist courts 5 Koori Courts 5 Drug Court 6 Family Violence Court Division 7 Neighbourhood Justice Centre 7 Specialist court lists and services 8 Government departments and agencies 9 Parole boards 9 WHEN IS A SENTENCE IMPOSED? 10 The process leading to a sentence 10 Investigation 10 Arrest and the charge 10 Prosecution 11 Bail and remand 11 Mention hearing 11 Sentence indication 11 Guilty plea 12 Summary hearing 12 Committal hearing 12 Trial 12 Pre-sentence reports 13 Sentencing hearing 14 Imposing sentence and
    [Show full text]
  • Court Services Victoria Annual Report 2015-16
    ANNUAL REPORT 2015-16 Children’s Court of Victoria SUPPORTING VICTORIAN COURTS Coroners Court of Victoria Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT) Court Services Victoria acknowledges the This report may also be downloaded Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people as from the Court Services Victoria website the Traditional Custodians of the land. Court www.courts.vic.gov.au Services Victoria also acknowledges and pays respect to their Elders, past and present. Accessibility If you would like to receive a printed This report is protected by copyright. Apart copy of this publication, please email from any use permitted under the Copyright [email protected] Act 1968 (Cth), all rights are reserved. Enquires: © Court Services Victoria Court Services Victoria 223 William Street ISSN 2205-1090 (Print) Melbourne Vic 3000 Email: [email protected] Published by Court Services Victoria Design: Celsius Design Photography: Bonnie Savage and William Hung November 2016 1 Supreme Court of Victoria County Court of Victoria Magistrates’ Court of Victoria CONTENTS 03 Responsible Body’s Declaration 04 Message from the Chair 07 Message from the Chief Executive Officer Report of Operations 09 Section 1: Governance and Organisational Structure 18 Section 2: Year in Review 35 Section 3: Workforce Data 42 Section 4: Other Disclosures Financial Statements 54 Financial Statements 62 Notes to the Financial Statements 2 Court Services Victoria Annual Report 2015—2016 Report of Operations 3 COURT SERVICES VICTORIA Court Services Victoria (CSV) was established on 1 July 2014 as an independent statutory body to provide administrative services and facilities to support Victorian courts, the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal, and the Judicial College of Victoria.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012-13 Annual Report
    Supreme Court of Victoria 2012–13 ANNUAL REPORT Letter to the Governor October 2013 To His Excellency Alex Chernov AO QC, Governor of the State of Victoria and its Dependencies in the Commonwealth of Australia. Dear Governor, We, the judges of the Supreme Court of Victoria, have the honour of presenting our Annual Report pursuant to the Supreme Court Act 1986 with respect to the financial year of 1 July 2012 to 30 June 2013. Yours sincerely, Marilyn L Warren AC The Honourable Chief Justice Supreme Court of Victoria C Maxwell, P J H L Forrest, J P Buchanan, JA L Lasry, J G A A Nettle, JA J G Judd, J M A Neave, AO JA P N Vickery, J R F Redlich, JA E J Kyrou, J M Weinberg, JA D F R Beach, J P M Tate, JA J Davies, J R S Osborn, JA T M Forrest, J S P Whelan, JA K L Emerton, J P G Priest, JA C E Croft, J P A Coghlan, JA A Ferguson, J K M Williams, J M L Sifris, J S W Kaye, J P W Almond, J E J Hollingworth, J J R Dixon, J K H Bell, J C C Macaulay, J K W S Hargrave, J K McMillan, J B J King, J G H Garde, AO RFD J A L Cavanough, J G J Digby, J E H Curtain, J J D Elliott, J R M Robson, J T J Ginnane, J On the cover Elements of entries to the 2012 Chief Justice Prize for excellence in design feature on the cover.
    [Show full text]