Zero Waste Recycling List 5-19

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Recyclephoenix.gov/recycle PAPER PLASTIC METAL GLASS Put these materials in your Recycle blue recycling container: PAPER HARD PLASTIC (NO FOAM) Cardboard (please break down) Bottles (leave caps on) Cereal boxes (remove plastic liner) Coffee cup lids Office paper, junk mail, sticky notes, magazines Cups, Jars and Jugs Clean pizza boxes Tubs, lids, clamshells, containers Newspaper METAL Egg cartons (paper or plastic, no foam) Aluminum cans Empty paper milk cartons Aluminum foil or trays (clean off all food; Empty soup and juice boxes (aseptic containers) ball foil into softball size) Envelopes (windows OK) Steel and tin cans Packing or craft paper GLASS Paper bags Glass bottles and jars only (lids off) Shredded paper (place in a clear plastic bag) Wrapping paper (non-metallic) Recycle Tips Unacceptable Items Paper towels, napkins or tissues (consider composting) 0” .5” 1” 1.5” 2” 2.5” Polystyrene or foam Break down boxes Anything less than 2.5” in diameter cannot be recycled Plastic bags and other soft plastics (return to local grocery or retail store) Food scraps and yard waste (consider composting) Recyclables must be free Electronics (return to local Paper: If you can rip it, electronics store) of food, grease and liquids you can recycle it Batteries (return to local electronics or hardware store) Light bulbs (return to local Do Not Bag hardware store) Recyclables Large scrap metal or car parts (take to local scrap yard) phoenix.gov/recycle | [email protected] | 602-262-6251.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Hazardous Waste Minimization Guide
Waste Minimization Guide Environmental Health & Safety 4202 E. Fowler Ave. OPM 100 Tampa, FL 33620 (813) 974-4036 h ttp://www.usf.edu/ehs/ June 1, 2020 Table of Contents Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 2 Methods for Waste Minimization ............................................................................................................. 2 Source Reduction .................................................................................................................................. 2 Environmentally Sound Recycling (ESR) .................................................................................................... 4 Treatment ............................................................................................................................................. 4 Managing Waste Efficiently ...................................................................................................................... 4 Flammable Liquids and Solids ............................................................................................................... 5 Halogenated Solvents ........................................................................................................................... 5 Solvent Contaminated Towels and Rags ............................................................................................... 6 Paint related Wastes ............................................................................................................................
[Show full text]
Assessment of the Possible Reuse of Extractive Waste Coming from Abandoned Mine Sites: Case Study in Gorno, Italy
sustainability Article Assessment of the Possible Reuse of Extractive Waste Coming from Abandoned Mine Sites: Case Study in Gorno, Italy Neha Mehta 1,2, Giovanna Antonella Dino 1,*, Iride Passarella 3, Franco Ajmone-Marsan 4, Piergiorgio Rossetti 1 and Domenico Antonio De Luca 1 1 Department of Earth Sciences, University of Turin, 10125 Torino, Italy; [email protected] (N.M.); [email protected] (P.R.); [email protected] (D.A.D.L.) 2 School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, BT9 5AH, UK 3 Horizon s.r.l., 10095 Grugliasco (TO), Italy; [email protected] 4 Department of Agricultural, Forestry and Food Sciences, University of Turin, 10095 Grugliasco (TO), Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-011-6705150 Received: 21 January 2020; Accepted: 17 March 2020; Published: 21 March 2020 Abstract: Supply of resources, a growing population, and environmental pollution are some of the main challenges facing the contemporary world. The rapid development of mining activities has produced huge amounts of waste. This waste, found in abandoned mine sites, provides the potential opportunity of extracting raw material. The current study, therefore, focuses on testing the validation of a shared methodology to recover extractive waste from abandoned mines, and applies this methodology to a case study in Gorno, northwest Italy. The methods focused on: (1) analyzing the impact of tailings and ﬁne fraction of waste rock (<2 mm) on plants (Cress - Lepidium Sativum) to assess usability of both as soil additive, and (2) recovering raw materials from tailings and coarse fraction (>2 mm) of waste rock, by means of dressing methods like wet shaking table and froth ﬂotation.
[Show full text]
Five Principles of Waste Product Redesign Under the Upcycling Concept
International Forum on Energy, Environment Science and Materials (IFEESM 2015) Five Principles of Waste Product Redesign under the Upcycling Concept Jiang XU1 & Ping GU1 1School of Design, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, China KEYWORD: Upcycling; Redesign principle; Green design; Industrial design; Product design ABSTRACT: It explores and constructs the principles of waste product redesign which are based on the concept of upcycling. It clarifies the basic concept of upcycling, briefly describes its current development, deeply discusses its value and significance, combines with the idea of upcycling which behinds regeneration design principle from the concept of “4R” of green design, and takes real-life case as example to analyze the principles of waste product redesign. It puts forward five principles of waste product redesign: value enhancement, make the most use of waste, durable and environmental protection, cost control and populace's aesthetic. INTRODUCTION Recently, environmental problems was becoming worse and worse, while as a developing country, China is facing dual pressures that economical development and environmental protection. However, large numbers of goods become waste every day all over the world, but the traditional recycling ways, such as melting down and restructuring, not only produce much CO2, but also those restruc- tured parts or products cannot mention in the same breath with raw ones. As a result, the western countries started to center their attention to the concept of “upcycling” of green design, which can transfer the old and waste things into more valuable products to vigorously develop the green econ- omy. Nevertheless, this new concept hasn’t been well known and the old notion of traditionally inef- ficient reuse still predominant in China, so it should be beneficial for our social development to con- struct the principles of waste products’ redesign which are based on the concept of upcycling.
[Show full text]
Workplace Recycling
SETTING UP Workplace Recycling 1 Form a Enlist a group of employees interested in recycling and waste prevention to set up and monitor collection systems Recycling Team to ensure ongoing success. This is a great team-building exercise and can positively impact employee morale as well as the environment. 2 Determine Customize your recycling program based on your business. Consider performing a waste audit or take inventory of materials the kinds of materials in your trash & recycling. to recycle Commonly recycled business items: Single-Stream Recycling • Aluminum & tin cans; plastic & glass bottles • Office paper, newspaper, cardboard • Magazines, catalogs, file folders, shredded paper 3 Contact Find out if recycling services are already in place. If not, ask the facility or property manager to set them up. Point your facility out that in today’s environment, employees expect to recycle at work and that recycling can potentially reduce costs. If recycling is currently provided, check with the manager to make sure good recycling education materials or property are available to all employees. This will help employees to recycle right, improve the quality of recyclable materials, manager and increase recycling participation. 4 Coordinate Work station recycling containers – Provide durable work station recycling containers or re-use existing training containers like copy paper boxes. Make recycling available at each work station. with the Click: Get-Started-Recycling-w_glass or Get-Started-Recycling-without-glass to print recycling container labels. Label your trash containers as well: Get-Started-Trash-with-food waste or janitorial crew Get-Started-Trash -no-food waste. and/or staff Central area containers – Evaluate the type and size of containers for common areas like conference rooms, hallways, reception areas, and cafes, based on volume, location, and usage.
[Show full text]
Participating in Food Waste Transitions: Exploring Surplus Food Redistribution in Singapore Through the Ecologies of Participation Framework
Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/cjoe20 Participating in food waste transitions: exploring surplus food redistribution in Singapore through the ecologies of participation framework Monika Rut , Anna R. Davies & Huiying Ng To cite this article: Monika Rut , Anna R. Davies & Huiying Ng (2020): Participating in food waste transitions: exploring surplus food redistribution in Singapore through the ecologies of participation framework, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, DOI: 10.1080/1523908X.2020.1792859 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2020.1792859 © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group Published online: 16 Jul 2020. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 79 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=cjoe20 JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY & PLANNING https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2020.1792859 Participating in food waste transitions: exploring surplus food redistribution in Singapore through the ecologies of participation framework Monika Rut a, Anna R. Davies a and Huiying Ng b aDepartment of Geography, Museum Building, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland; bIndependent Scholar, Singapore ABSTRACT KEYWORDS Food waste is a global societal meta-challenge requiring a sustainability transition Food waste; transitions; involving everyone, including publics. However, to date, much transitions research has participation; ecologies of been silent on the role of public participation and overly narrow in its geographical participation; Singapore reach. In response, this paper examines whether the ecologies of participation (EOP) approach provides a conceptual framing for understanding the role of publics within food waste transitions in Singapore.
[Show full text]
Sector N: Scrap and Waste Recycling
Industrial Stormwater Fact Sheet Series Sector N: Scrap Recycling and Waste Recycling Facilities U.S. EPA Office of Water EPA-833-F-06-029 February 2021 What is the NPDES stormwater program for industrial activity? Activities, such as material handling and storage, equipment maintenance and cleaning, industrial processing or other operations that occur at industrial facilities are often exposed to stormwater. The runoff from these areas may discharge pollutants directly into nearby waterbodies or indirectly via storm sewer systems, thereby degrading water quality. In 1990, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) developed permitting regulations under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to control stormwater discharges associated with eleven categories of industrial activity. As a result, NPDES permitting authorities, which may be either EPA or a state environmental agency, issue stormwater permits to control runoff from these industrial facilities. What types of industrial facilities are required to obtain permit coverage? This fact sheet specifically discusses stormwater discharges various industries including scrap recycling and waste recycling facilities as defined by Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Major Group Code 50 (5093). Facilities and products in this group fall under the following categories, all of which require coverage under an industrial stormwater permit: ◆ Scrap and waste recycling facilities (non-source separated, non-liquid recyclable materials) engaged in processing, reclaiming, and wholesale distribution of scrap and waste materials such as ferrous and nonferrous metals, paper, plastic, cardboard, glass, and animal hides. ◆ Waste recycling facilities (liquid recyclable materials) engaged in reclaiming and recycling liquid wastes such as used oil, antifreeze, mineral spirits, and industrial solvents.
[Show full text]
Profits from the Past
Reprocessing and tailings reduction.qxp_proof 29/04/2020 09:50 Page 1 REPROCESSING AND TAILINGS REDUCTION In Colombia, AuVert's technology is being combined with CDE's experience in dewatering Profits from the past and tailings management to extract the remaining precious metals existing in the ground, while removing up to 93% of residual mercury which has to date prevented this land from being used by the local population reasons why mining companies may be cautious about using tailings as backfill material or relocating current day ‘waste’ to an inaccessible area of the mine, according to Gerritsen. “As technology improves, the opportunity to recover more of the metals/minerals increases,” he said. “There are elements where that may not be the case – coal ash, for example, cannot be reprocessed but can be used to produce cement. While tailings dam liabilities and falling water resources are There are certainly opportunities with gold, affecting the ability of miners to start new mines, or expand copper and even coal, for instance.” The strategies companies ultimately pursue for existing ones, these issues are strengthening the case for these ‘waste streams’ depend on the technology reprocessing and retreating ‘waste’ sites or streams. Dan available and the safety of the facilities, Gerritsen Gleeson explores an increasingly diverse market focused on remarked. revenue generation and risk reduction “For instance, it may not be economically viable to reprocess the material currently in a ith improved transparency around recycling and thickening, or SART, plant from BQE tailings storage facility and, therefore, the owner tailings dams and waste stockpiles now Water will only bolster cash reserves through the may decide to close it or put it into a non-active Wpart and parcel of being a responsible recovery of a high-grade saleable copper sulphide state,” he said.
[Show full text]
Procter & Gamble “Zero Manufacturing Waste to Landfill”
Procter & Gamble “Zero Manufacturing Waste to Landfill” Background One of P&G’s 2020 goals for Operations is that <0.5% of Manufacturing Waste is disposed (to either landfill or incineration without energy recovery) versus a 2010 baseline and our corporate long term vision is to have zero consumer or manufacturing waste go to landfills. This goal and vision will drive an increase in the diversion of P&G waste materials away from disposal to reuse, recycling and recovery solutions and it will drive more sites to achieve zero manufacturing waste to landfill status. All P&G sites will adopt the definition of zero manufacturing waste to landfill below and will follow the subsequent guidelines on measurement, reporting and communications to ensure a consistent approach to zero manufacturing waste to landfill across the company. Definition of Zero Manufacturing Waste to Landfill “Zero manufacturing waste to Landfill means zero manufacturing waste is disposed directly to landfill or to Incineration without energy recovery by the site, except where local legal requirements specify that regulated wastes must be disposed in a landfill” Beneficial Reuse Beneficial Reuse simply includes P&G waste sent for Reuse, Recycling or Incineration with Energy Recovery. Incineration without Energy Recovery and Landfill will count as Disposal. Incineration From an environmental perspective Incineration without Energy Recovery is considered to have few benefits over landfill and much less benefit than Incineration with Energy Recovery. This position is reflected in the globally accepted Waste Hierarchy. Therefore sending waste to incineration without energy recovery will not count as diverting the material from landfill.
[Show full text]
HP Closed-Loop Recycling Advancing a Circular Economy
• Brief HP closed-loop recycling Advancing a circular economy When you choose Original HP Cartridges and recycle through HP Planet Partners1, you’re taking part in a closed loop—where materials are added and reused to make new products, and no cartridges end up in a landfill. Circular economy vs. Linear economy Purchase and use 1 Original HP Ink or Toner New Original HP Cartridges 6 Return used Non-HP are ready to be 1 cartridges shipped 2 cartridges for free hp.com/hprecycle Poor-quality, 2 costly reprints2 HP uses recycled Cartridges 5 plastics3 in new 3 are sorted, cartridges to disassembled, close the loop or shredded Nearly 90% of 3 cartridges end up in landfills4 Other post-consumer 4 plastics are added to ink cartridges Redefining impact and changing lives HP uses recycled plastic bottles collected in Haiti and from other sources in the manufacturing of Original HP Ink Cartridges. This effort helps to create sustainable jobs, brings opportunity to the people in Haiti, and helps prevent plastics from reaching the Caribbean Sea. For more information on HP closed-loop recycling and our efforts in Haiti, see hp.com/go/Rosette. Together, we’re recycling for a better world The results speak for themselves. Here’s the difference HP made in 2018 by using recycled plastic in ink cartridges instead of new plastic: 60% reduction 39% less 30% average in fossil fuel water used5 carbon footprint consumption5 Enough to supply reduction5 Conserved more than 7.9 million Americans Like taking 533 cars off 7 6 for one day 8 705 barrels of oil the road for one year Bringing used products back to life With your help, we’re closing the loop.
[Show full text]
Borough of Oakland Notice of Change to Recyclable
BOROUGH OF OAKLAND NOTICE OF CHANGE TO RECYCLABLE MATERIALS EFFECTIVE IMEDIATELY Dear Resident, Over the past two years the market for plastic recyclables has changed dramatically. For many years most plastic recyclables in the U.S. were sold to Chinese manufacturers. Their ever increasing demand for raw materials resulted in an expansion of the types of plastic materials that were accepted, even if those items were of marginal quality or contaminated. This eventually led to an expansion in the types of products the Borough was able to recycle. Last year the Chinese government began enforcing policies (their ‘Green Fence”) aimed at rejecting any materials that were contaminated or contained non-recyclable items. Due to these stricter regulations, there is now an oversupply of recyclables at the domestic mills in the U.S.A. and Canada and not enough market demand for certain types of materials. As a result, the Borough’s recycling marketer will not accept the following: Plastics numbered 3, 4, 6 or 7 Plastic bags, including, shopping bags, garbage bags and Ziploc bags Plastic film wrapping, including garment bags Styrofoam of any kind Rigid plastics such as toys, crates, lawn furniture Hoses Pesticide containers Frozen microwave trays or food platters, even if stamped 1, 2 or 5 Wax cardboard boxes In addition, the Borough’s marketer will not be able to accept shredded paper. Unfortunately, the above materials must now be placed in the trash or recycled by using the alternatives specified later in this notice. If they continue to be put in curbside recycling, they will be rejected by the marketer, sent to a landfill for disposal and the Borough will be charged a disposal fee greater than what we currently pay to dispose of our own garbage.
[Show full text]
Annual Report 2010
Action Earth ACRES Adeline Lo Thank You Ai Xin Society for your invaluable support Anderson Junior College Andrew Tay Assembly of Youth for the Environment So many individuals, food outlets AWARE Balakrishnan Matchap and organizations gave their Betty Hoe invaluable effort, time and Bishan Community Library resources to light the path Bright Hill Temple British Petroleum (BP) towards vegetarianism. Space Bukit Merah Public Library may not have allowed us to list Cat Welfare Society Catherina Hosoi everyone, but all the same, we Central Library of the National Library Board extend our most heartfelt thanks Chong Hua Tong Tou Teck Hwee movement to you. Douglas Teo Dr Raymond Yuen Environmental Challenge Organisation Vegetarian Society (Singapore) ROS Registration No.: ROS/RCB 0123/1999 Singapore 3 Pemimpin Drive, #07-02, Lip Hing Bldg, Charity Registration No.: 1851 UEN: S99SS0065J Family Service Centre (Yishun) Singapore 576147 Foreign Domestic Worker Association (address for correspondence only) Gelin www.vegetarian-society.org Genesis Vegetarian Health Food Restaurant [email protected] Global Indian International School Green Kampung website Greendale Secondary School Green Roundtable Noah’s Ark Natural Animal Sanctuary Guangyang Primary School NUS SAVE GUI (Ground Up Initiative) NutriHub Herty Chen Post Museum Indonesia Vegetarian Society Queensway Secondary School International Vegetarian Union Prof Harvey Neo Juggi Ramakrishnan Raffles Institution Lim Yi Ting Rameshon Murugiah Kevin Tan Rosina Arquati Heng Guan Hou Serene Peh Hort Park Singapore Buddhist Federation Kampung Senang Charity and Education Singapore Kite Association Foundation Singapore Malayalee Association Loving Hut Restaurants Singapore Polytechnic Singapore Sports Council Mahaya Menon Singapore Tourism Board Maria and Ana Laura Rivarola Singapore Vegetarian Meetup Groups ANNUALREPORTFOR2010 Mayura Mohta SPCA Maitreyawira School St Anthony’s Canossian Secondary School Media Corp Straits Times MEVEG (Middle East Vegetarian Group) T.
[Show full text]
COMPOST FEASIBILITY STUDY April 2017
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COMPOST FEASIBILITY STUDY April 2017 COMMISSIONED BY: District of Columbia Department of Public Works PREPARED BY: 416 LONGSHORE DRIVE ANN ARBOR, MI 48105 734.996.1361 RECYCLE.COM TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 1 Background and Purpose .............................................................................................................................. 7 Current Operations ................................................................................................................................... 8 SSO Collection ......................................................................................................................................... 10 Processing ............................................................................................................................................... 11 Organics Collection ...................................................................................................................................... 12 Processing Technology ................................................................................................................................ 14 Organics Outreach ....................................................................................................................................... 16 SSO Curbside Collection Modeling .............................................................................................................
[Show full text]