DOCSLIB.ORG

The High Commissioner for Human Rights and North Korea

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The High Commissioner for Human Rights and North Korea Source: The United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Conscience for the World, Edited by Felice D. Gaer and Christen L. Broecker (Brill |Nijhoff, 2014), pp. 293- 310. http://www.brill.com/united-nations-high-commissioner-human-rights-0 Chapter 15 The High Commissioner for Human Rights and North Korea Roberta Cohen1 The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK or North Korea), is best known internationally for its development of nuclear weapons and for the chronic hunger and malnutrition endured by much of its population. Less publicized have been its widespread and grave human rights violations, which North Korea has taken great pains to conceal. The country is by far the world’s most inaccessible and ‘most secretive,’ with its population often described as ‘the hidden people.’2 Since 1948, the Kim dynasty has ruled North Korea with an ideology of nationalistic self-reliance (juche) effectively minimizing ties with much of the rest of the world. While there have been recent inroads into this closed society, North Koreans cannot exit their country freely, are not allowed to telephone outside the country or listen to radio broadcasts from abroad, and only a small number are allowed access to the internet.3 Between North and South Korea today, “there is no telephone service…no postal service, no email.”4 Foreigners allowed entry are limited in their ability to communicate with North Koreans. Even during the great famine of the mid 1990s when North Korea invited in international food agencies to counter starvation (at least one million reportedly died), it restricted the access and involvement of aid workers with the North Korean people.5 Kim Jong Il, who in 1994 inherited the leadership of North Korea from his father Kim Il Sung, is quoted as saying, “We must envelop our environment in a dense fog to prevent our enemies from learning anything about us.”6 Origin of concern about human rights in North Korea Largely because of the restrictions, inaccessibility and resulting lack of hard information, the first in-depth human rights report about North Korea was not published until 1988, 40 years after Kim Il Sung first assumed power. Two non-governmental organizations 1 The author wishes to thank JBI Associate Director Christen Broecker for her valuable research assistance and editorial suggestions. 2 See Ralph Hassig and Kongdan Oh, The Hidden People of North Korea: Everyday Life in the Hermit Kingdom (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2009), 3-5. 3 See UN General Assembly, Report of the UN Secretary-General, Situation of human rights in the DPRK, UN Doc. A/65/391, September 24, 2010, para.19; Hassig & Oh, The Hidden People; and Melanie Kirkpatrick, Escape from North Korea: The Untold Story of Asia’s Underground Railroad (New York: Encounter Books, 2012), 275-279. 4 Barbara Demick, Nothing to Envy: Ordinary Lives in North Korea (New York: Spiegel & Grau, 2010), 10. 5 See Andrew S. Natsios, The Great North Korean Famine (Washington, DC: US Institute of Peace Press, 2001), 5, 48-9, 140, 174-5, 215, 224. 6 Demick, Northing to Envy, opening page. (NGOs) in the United States – the Minnesota Lawyers International Human Rights Committee and Asia Watch decided to bring to light whatever information they could find even though they could not visit and had to rely on unverified interviews and second hand reports. Their findings described draconian controls imposed on the population reinforced by regularized torture and summary executions.7 Earlier in 1979, Amnesty International published the accounts of a Venezuelan and Frenchman detained in the North on political grounds from 1967 to 1974 and introduced North Korea’s political prison camp system to an international audience.8 By 1991, Amnesty reported that, “Tens of thousands of people, including prisoners of conscience, appear to have been detained since the 1960s under various forms of arbitrary detention…. Thousands more appear to have been victims of ‘disappearances,’ torture or summary execution.”9 Neither the United Nations Division of Human Rights nor the UN Centre for Human Rights – the predecessors to the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) – played a significant role in bringing to light the situation in the DPRK. To be sure, an expert body of the Commission – the Sub-Commission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities adopted a resolution on human rights in North Korea in 1997,10 and the following year called on the Commission to take up the situation.11 But it was not the High Commissioner or her staff that flagged the situation even though that Office took initiatives on other countries.12 Rather, the Sub-Commission’s resolutions originated with the author of the1988 Minnesota Lawyers Committee report, David Weissbrodt, who became an expert member of the Sub-Commission from 1996 to 2003. In 2003, the Commission on Human Rights for the first time adopted a resolution on North Korea and in 2004 appointed a Special Rapporteur to investigate and report on the human rights situation.13 The 2003 resolution was the result of the efforts of NGOs and Western states, especially France, which was influenced by the publication in French in 2000 7 Minnesota Lawyers International Human Rights Committee and Asia Watch, Human Rights in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, 1988. 8 David Hawk, The Hidden Gulag: The Lives and Voices of “Those Who are Sent to the Mountains,” 2nd ed. (Washington, DC: Committee for Human Rights in North Korea, 2012), 42-3. 9 Amnesty International, “North Korea: Summary of Amnesty International's concerns,” October 13, 1993. Amnesty International was allowed to pay a visit in 1991, the only time an international human rights NGO was allowed entry to North Korea. 10 UN Sub-Commission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities, Resolution 1997/3, “Situation of human rights in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea,” UN Doc. E/CN.4/1998/2, August 21, 1997, 18. 11 UN Sub-Commission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities, Resolution 1998/2, August 19, 1998. The 1997 and 1998 resolutions cited reports of “mass internments” in detention centers, the deaths of “many” political prisoners, “frequent reports of extrajudicial execution and disappearances,” and “serious restrictions” on free movement. They expressed concern about the “virtual impossibility of obtaining information or visiting that country” and urged greater international attention to the problem so as to help North Korea’s population emerge “from the isolation in which it is maintained.” 12 See Bertrand Ramcharan, A UN High Commissioner in Defense of Human Rights (Leiden: Brill, 2004), 12. The author reports initiatives that he undertook as Acting High Commissioner (August 2003- July 2004) on countries such as Liberia, Sudan (Darfur), Iraq and Ivory Coast. 13 See UN Commission on Human Rights, Resolution 2003/10, “Situation of human rights in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea,” UN Doc. E/CN.4/RES/2003/10, April 16, 2003; and UN Commission on Human Rights, Resolution 2004/13, “Situation of human rights in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea,” E/CN.4/RES/2004/13, April 15, 2004. of a first-hand account by a North Korean survivor of a prison labor camp.14 The resolution in 2004 appointing a Special Rapporteur was in part the initiative of the United States and its head of delegation Richard Williamson15 as well as of the EU. Reinforcing the effort was a report submitted to the Commission by the OHCHR Secretariat summarizing UN activities on human rights in North Korea.16 But the overall effort came from the outside, and even then these Commission resolutions were adopted more than 50 years after the Kim dynasty assumed power and 15 years after the first NGO report on the human rights situation. UN treaty bodies, composed of independent experts and serviced by the Office of the High Commissioner, provided some help. As a result of its accession to four international human rights treaties,17 the DPRK was obliged to submit reports every few years on its compliance to the expert bodies set up to monitor their implementation. Its reports, however, were mostly sparse and sometimes not forthcoming at all.18 In fact, the Human Rights Committee observed in 2001 that 17 years had lapsed since the last dialogue with the DPRK and that the lack of information provided by North Korea made it difficult to address effectively “credible and substantiated allegations” brought to its attention by other sources.19 The Committee nonetheless made extensive recommendations as did other treaty bodies and provided an information base that helped states draft the Sub-Commission and Commission resolutions.20 Notwithstanding this supporting role, the impetus for unearthing and publishing information about the human rights situation in North Korea and pressing states to take action came from non-governmental organizations, not the United Nations. Role of the High Commissioner In looking at the role played by the High Commissioner prior to the adoption of the 2003 resolution, two questions arise. When grave human rights violations are suspected in a country and verifiable information is difficult to come by, what role should the High Commissioner or her Office play in unearthing that information and trying to publicize it? 14 See Kang Chol-hwan and Pierre Rigoulot, The Aquariums of Pyongyang: Ten Years in the North Korean Gulag (Paris: Editions Robert Laffont, 2000) [in French], English trans. Yair Reiner (New York: Basic Books, 2001). 15 Conversation of February 8, 2012 with Ambassador Richard Williamson, head of the US Delegation to the Commission on Human Rights in 2004. He pointed out that President George W. Bush read The Aquariums of Pyongyang, met with former North Korean prisoner Kang Chol-hwan and supported strong UN action on human rights in North Korea.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Vice-Chancellor, I Have the Honour to Present, for the Award of the Degree of Doctor of Laws, Honoris Causa, Navanethem Pillay
    Vice-Chancellor, I have the honour to present, for the award of the degree of Doctor of Laws, honoris causa, Navanethem Pillay. Rwanda is a small state in east-central Africa. It is known for its natural beauty, with dramatic steep mountains and deep valleys covering most of the country. In 1994 this scene was devastated by genocide, and, in just three months, nearly a million people were slaughtered. Four years later, the mayor of the Rwandan town of Taba was tried and, on 2 September 1998, became the first person to be convicted of genocide in an international court 1. Two days later, former Rwandan Prime Minister Jean Kambanda was sentenced to life imprisonment 2 and became the first head of state to be held accountable for atrocities committed during his regime 3. Navi Pillay, whom we honour today, was one of the judges responsible for these convictions AND for setting these groundbreaking precedents. “Groundbreaking” and “first” are words that crop up many times in Navi Pillay’s distinguished career. She was born in Durban and studied at University of Natal Law School. She was the first woman to open her own law practice in Natal. Her precedent setting achievements began even then, when she won the right for Robben Island prisoners to have access to legal representation. After that, she served on the bench as an Acting Judge in the South African High Court. She then spent eight years with the International Criminal Tribunal of Rwanda, where she led a number of groundbreaking decisions, including defining rape as a war crime.
    [Show full text]
  • Side-Event at the 23Rd Session of the UN Human Rights Council Dalit
    Side-event at the 23rd session of the UN Human Rights Council Dalit Women: Working together towards the elimination of multiple and intersecting forms of discrimination and violence based on gender and caste Opening remarks by Ms. Navi Pillay United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Geneva, 4 June 2013 Distinguished participants, Let me start by congratulating the organisers of this event, IDSN, IMADR, Human Rights Watch, and Minority Rights Group and the group of co-sponsoring states, for organising this important discussion today on “Dalit women: Working together towards the elimination of multiple and intersecting forms of discrimination and violence based on gender and caste”. Caste based discrimination and untouchability still remain a wide spread practice affecting an estimated 260 million individuals around the world considered to belong to “lower castes”. The caste system is the very negation of the principles of equality and non- discrimination, eroding the enjoyment of a wide range of political, civil, economic, social and cultural rights for Dalits and other caste affected groups. Among them, Dalit women and girls are exposed to multiple forms of discrimination based on gender and caste and, therefore, vulnerable to several layers of marginalisation and violence. The specific human rights violations that originate from the intersection of discrimination based on caste and gender include sexual violence, sexual exploitation, trafficking, other forms of gender-based violence, bonded labour, lack of or limited access to food, water and sanitation, healthcare, education, adequate housing, and unequal participation in political, economic and social life. Earlier this year, this nexus came into tragic focus following terrible cases of sexual violence in India, some targeting Dalit women.
    [Show full text]
  • 20 April 2009 GENEVA
    UN INFORMATION SERVICE 20 April 2009 GENEVA TRANSCRIPT OF STATEMENTS BY SECRETARY-GENERAL AND HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS AT PRESS CONFERENCE ON OPENING OF DURBAN REVIEW CONFERENCE Following is a transcript of the remarks by United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay made at a press conference in the Palais des Nations at the end of the opening day of the Durban Review Conference. The Review Conference, which runs from 20 to 24 April in Geneva, will assess progress made since the 2001 World Conference against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance held in Durban, South Africa. The UN Secretary-General: Ladies and gentlemen, it is a great pleasure to see you again. One of the primary roles of the United Nations is to mobilize action against the pervasive violations of human rights that take place in every part of our world. The fight against racism has been a core part of that mandate since the Organization’s founding. And it is the evil of racism that I want you, as members of the media, to stress to your audiences. Some people point to great strides that the world has made recently as evidence that racism is going away. But I am here to tell you that we still have to do much more. In fact, despite decades of advocacy, and despite the elaboration of a far- reaching legal framework, racism is something that we’re still living with. Despite the efforts of many United Nations human rights bodies, and despite ample evidence of racism’s terrible toll, millions upon millions of people continue to fall victim.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights Council 20 Session Opening Statement By
    Check against delivery Human Rights Council 20th Session Opening Statement by Ms. Navi Pillay United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Geneva, 18 June 2012 Madame President, Distinguished Members of the Human Rights Council, Excellencies, Colleagues and Friends, Once again we are meeting against a backdrop of crises around the globe. Economic strife continues to devastate lives and livelihoods across the world; political upheaval persists in countries large and small, prompting action by civil society; and humanitarian disasters present obstacles to peoples’ exercise of their human rights in far too many places. This Council has deliberated and acted on some of these crises and I am confident will do so during this session. This backdrop also continues to define my Office’s work, and reminds us of the duty we owe towards those suffering across the world. Let me begin by expressing my sincere gratitude to the General Assembly for appointing me for a second term and, of course, for the Secretary-General for his proposal. I am honoured by this decision and the support which you have shown me over the past four years. I will continue to work under a sense of obligation to the cause of human rights; to all the world's peoples, whom you represent; and human rights victims everywhere. The situation in Syria continues to deteriorate, and the suffering of civilians has increased significantly. The escalating violence has limited the ability of the UN Supervision Mission in Syria to carry out its mandate and as a result UNSMIS had to suspend its operation on 15 June.
    [Show full text]
  • UN Human Rights Experts
    ISSUE BRIEF No. 3942 | MAY 16, 2013 U.N. Human Rights Experts: More Transparency and Accountability Required Brett D. Schaefer and Steven Groves ecent statements by United Nations Human issues or situations in specific countries. In the RRights Council Special Rapporteur Richard course of their duties, the mandate holders (entitled Falk rekindled a debate over how such experts “special rapporteurs” or independent experts) may should be held accountable when their behavior vio- visit countries, bring attention to alleged human lates the conduct expected of them. Moreover, the rights violations or abuses through statements and scrutiny elicited by Falk’s statements has exposed communications, conduct studies, and otherwise the fact that funding for special procedures deserves comment, advocate, and raise awareness of their more transparency, especially regarding the ability mandates. As of April 1, 2013, there were 36 the- of mandate holders to not disclose financial support matic mandates and 13 country-specific mandates received from sources other than the U.N. regular of which a number were inherited by the HRC from budget. its predecessor, the discredited U.N. Commission on The U.S. should address these issues by demand- Human Rights.1 ing that the Human Rights Council (HRC) adopt Many mandate holders conduct themselves pro- an explicit procedure for dismissing mandate hold- fessionally and strive to fulfill their responsibilities ers who grossly or repeatedly violate the Code of with independence, impartiality, personal integri- Conduct for Mandate Holders, directing the HRC to ty, and objectivity, which, along with expertise and publicly post the financial implications of the spe- experience, are identified by the HRC as being of cial procedures, and requiring full disclosure of all “paramount importance” in the selection of mandate financial and other support received by mandate holders.2 Although Falk, the “Special Rapporteur on holders.
    [Show full text]
  • The Victims' Court?
    2015 THE VICTIMS’ COURT? A Study of 622 Victim Participants at the International Criminal Court UGANDA DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO KENYA CÔTE D’IVOIRE THE VICTIMS’ COURT? A Study of 622 Victim Participants at the International Criminal Court UGANDA DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO KENYA CÔTE D’IVOIRE 2015 e Human Rights Center at the University of California, Berkeley, School of Law conducts research on war crimes and other serious violations of international humanitarian law and human rights. Using evidence- based methods and innovative technologies, we support eorts to hold perpetrators accountable and to protect vulnerable populations. We also train students and advocates to document human rights violations and turn this information into eective action. HUMAN RIGHTS CENTER University of California, Berkeley, School of Law Telegraph Avenue, Ste. , Berkeley, CA – Telephone: .. | Email: [email protected] Web: hrc.berkeley.edu | @HRCBerkeley Cover art: Stephen Smith Cody Design and graphics: Nicole Hayward CONTENTS ACRONYMS / v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / 1 INTRODUCTION / 7 THE STUDY / 9 VICTIM PARTICIPATION AND PROCEDURAL JUSTICE / 12 VICTIM PARTICIPATION IN CRIMINAL TRIALS / 16 VICTIM PARTICIPATION AT THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT / 18 THE VICTIM PARTICIPATION PROCESS / 20 MODELS OF VICTIM PARTICIPATION / 26 UGANDA / 29 DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO / 38 KENYA / 47 CÔTE D’IVOIRE / 60 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS / 71 APPENDIX 1: AUTHORS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS / 75 APPENDIX 2: VICTIM PARTICIPANT QUESTIONNAIRE / 76 ACRONYMS ASP Assembly of States
    [Show full text]
  • 25 YEARS of FIGHTING the SALE and SEXUAL EXPLOITATION of CHILDREN: ADDRESSING NEW CHALLENGES Acknowledgements
    United Nations Special Rapporteur on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography 25 YEARS OF FIGHTING THE SALE AND SEXUAL EXPLOITATION OF CHILDREN: ADDRESSING NEW CHALLENGES Acknowledgements The Special Rapporteur, Ms Maud de Boer-Buquicchio, wishes to thank Plan International, DCI-ECPAT Netherlands, and Terre des Hommes International who made this project possible. In addition, the Special Rapporteur is appreciative of the financial contributions from the Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Furthermore, she is grateful to the consultant who developed this publication, Mr Dorian Hall, under the guidance of Ms Nekane Lavín of the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. Lastly, Ms de Boer-Buquicchio wishes to pay tribute to the second Special Rapporteur Ms Ofelia Calcetas-Santos who passed away in 2011. Her contribution to the mandate is immeasurable and she helped shape the agenda on the fight against the sale and sexual exploitation of children at crucial moments, namely during the first World Congress against Commercial Sexual Exploitation of Children in Stockholm in 1996 and the negotiations leading to the adoption of the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography in 2000. Handbook by the Special Rapporteur on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography Special Rapporteur on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography c/o Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights United Nations at Geneva 814 Avenue de la Paix 1211 Geneva 10 Switzerland www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Children/Pages/ChildrenIndex.aspx Design and layout by Anya Gass, Plan International United Nations Office in Geneva With the support of: Plan International Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands Dukes Court, Block A, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • An Activist's Guide to the Yogyakarta Principles
    An Activist’s Guide to The Yogyakarta Principles Guide to The Yogyakarta An Activist’s The Application of International Human Rights Law in Relation to Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity An Activist’s Guide to The Yogyakarta Principles Section 1 Overview and Context In 2006, in response to well- documented patterns of abuse, a distinguished group of international human rights experts met in Yogyakarta, Indonesia to outline a set of international principles relating to sexual orientation YogYakarta, and gender identity. IndoneSIa The result is the Yogyakarta Principles: a universal guide to human rights which affirm binding international legal standards with which all States must comply. They promise a different future where all people born free and equal in dignity and rights can fulfil that precious birthright. 2 An Activist’s Guide to The Yogyakarta Principles on the Application of International Human Rights Law in Relation to Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity In November 2006, we were honored to This Activist’s Guide is a tool for those Foreword serve as co-chairs of a four-day meeting who are working to create change and at Gadjah Mada University in Yogyakarta, build on the momentum that has already Indonesia. That meeting culminated a begun around the Yogyakarta Principles. We all have the same human rights. drafting process among twenty-nine In local neighborhoods and international Whatever our sexual orientation, gender international human rights experts organisations, activists of all sexual who identified the existing state of orientations and gender identities are a identity, nationality, place of residence, sex, international human rights law in relation vital part of the international human rights to issues of sexual orientation and gender system, serving as monitors, educators, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, identity.
    [Show full text]
  • Yogyakarta Principles on the Application of International Human Rights Law in Relation to Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity
    THE YOGYAKARTA PRINCIPLES PrinciPles on the aPPlication of international human rights law in relation to sexual orientation and gender identity the english version is the authoritative text. official translations are available in arabic, chinese, french, russian and spanish. march 2007 THE YOGYAKARTA PRINCIPLES Principles on the application of international human rights law in relation to sexual orientation and gender identity TABLE OF CONTENTS introduction ................................................................................................................ 6 Preamble ...................................................................................................................... 8 PrinciPle 1. the right to the universal enjoyment of human rights ................................ 10 PrinciPle 2. the rights to equality and non-discrimination ................................................ 10 PrinciPle 3. the right to recognition before the law ............................................................ 11 PrinciPle . the right to life ......................................................................................................... 12 PrinciPle . the right to security of the Person ...................................................................... 13 PrinciPle 6. the right to Privacy .................................................................................................. 1 PrinciPle 7. the right to freedom from arbitrary deprivation of liberty .......................... 1 PrinciPle 8. the right to
    [Show full text]
  • Ending Violence Against Women and Girls: Youth As Agents of Change Friday, March 8, 13:00-15:00 Room XXIV, Palais Des Nations, Geneva
    International Women’s Day Ending Violence Against Women and Girls: Youth As Agents of Change Friday, March 8, 13:00-15:00 Room XXIV, Palais des Nations, Geneva According to the report of the UN Secretary General submitted to the Commission on the Status of Women for its 57th session, an estimated 7 in 10 women worldwide have been subjected to physical and/or sexual violence. This alarming figure underscores that violence against women and girls remains one of the most pervasive violations of human rights. Even as these tragedies still occur as has been observed in recent events around the world, there has been remarkable activism to combat these crimes and to raise awareness on these issues. Transformative change, which challenges the practices, customs, traditions and stereotypes which perpetuate violence against women and girls, is essential to end this scourge. Youth have an important role to play in this regard, and in many places around the world have already demonstrated remarkable commitment and taken action to prevent violence. Join us for an interactive discussion with inspiring youth representatives on their efforts to address violence against women and girls, and on how their potential to effect positive change can best be harnessed. Moderator: Dr. Shalini Randeria, The Graduate Institute Geneva Introductory Remarks: Ms. Navi Pillay, UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Panelists: Oliver Rizzi Carlson, Switzerland Michelle Freeman, United States Priscilla Gonzalez, Mexico Sophie Debrunner Hall, Switzerland Saba Joshi, India Kgothatso Elisa Mokoen, South Africa This event is sponsored by OHCHR, UNFPA, WHO, YWCA, The Graduate Institute, Geneva, and Permanent Mis- sions of Mexico and the United States to the UN in Geneva.
    [Show full text]
  • ZIMBABWE Ongoing Risks for Human Rights Defenders in the Context of Political Deadlock and Pre-Electoral Period International Fact-Finding Mission Report a © WOZ ©
    ZIMBABWE ONGOING RISKS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDERS IN THE CONTEXT OF POLITICAL DEADLOCK AND PRE-ELECTORAL PERIOD International Fact-finding Mission Report A © WOZ © November 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION I. Introduction ...............................................................................................................................3 1. Past activities of the Observatory on Zimbabwe ............................................................ 3 A vibrant civil society is a crucial part of any democratic society’s development, in all 2. Political context .................................................................................................................. 3 spheres including human rights, and it should be strongly supported even if some of 3. Scope and composition of the mission ............................................................................ 5 its messages make uncomfortable reading for those in authority 1. 4. Methodology ...................................................................................................................... 5 5. Obstacles ............................................................................................................................. 6 Ms. Navi Pillay, United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, at the end of II. Pre-electoral periods in Zimbabwe: increased risks for public freedoms ......................... 7 her first ever mission to Zimbabwe (May 20 to 25, 2012) 1. The political deadlock hinders the implementation of reforms and the establishment
    [Show full text]
  • Harris Institute International Council
    HARRIS INSTITUTE INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL Elizabeth (Betsy) Andersen Betsy Andersen is Executive Director of the World Justice Project, leading its global efforts to advance the rule of law through research, strategic convenings, and support for innovative programs. Ms. Andersen has more than 20 years of experience in the international legal arena, having served previously as Director of the American Bar Association Rule of Law Initiative (ABA ROLI) and its Europe and Eurasia Division (previously known as the Central European and Eurasian Law Initiative or ABA CEELI), as Executive Director of the American Society of International Law, and as Executive Director of Human Rights Watch’s Europe and Central Asia Division. Ms. Andersen is an expert in international human rights law, international criminal law, and transitional justice, and she has taught these subjects as an adjunct professor at the American University Washington College of Law. She is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and serves as a member of the Board of Trustees of Williams College as well as on the governing and advisory boards of several international non-profit organizations. Ms. Andersen began her legal career in clerkships with Judge Kimba M. Wood of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York and with Judge Georges Abi-Saab of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. The Honorable Louise Arbour The Honorable Louise Arbour recently completed her mandate as the Special Representative of the United Nations Secretary-General for International Migration. She has also held other senior positions at the United Nations, including High Commissioner for Human Rights (2004- 2008) and Chief Prosecutor for The International Criminal Tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and for Rwanda (1996 to 1999).
    [Show full text]