DOCSLIB.ORG

1~.AJ!I~ Oj•L•L

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Agenda Item Over 50 Pages Can Be Viewed in Administration Agendaltem#: 3tl-1 PALM BEACH COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY Meeting Date: July 19, 2011 [ X] Consent [ ] Regular [ ] Public Hearing Department: Legislative Affairs Submitted By: Administration Submitted For: Legislative Affairs I. EXECUTIVE BRIEF Motion and Title: Staff recommends motion to approve: two (2) 16-month contracts for Federal Lobbying for the period of July 2011 -October 2012 in the total amount of$120,000 as described below: a) a contract with Becker & Poliakoff in the amount of $60,000 and; b) a contract with Alcalde & Fay in the amount of $60,000 Summary: Palm Beach County posted RFP #11-033/SC for individuals and firms to respond to a request to provide federal lobbying services for Palm Beach County. The RFP allows for the County to enter into a contract with one or more firms for an initial 16-month period with the option for renewal ofup to three 12-month contracts. Nine firms responded to the RFP. The county was unable to negotiate a contract with the top scoring firm due to a conflict of interest. The County negotiated with the next two highest ranking firms and believes that dividing the contract between the two would best serve the needs of the County. The total amount for the two initial 16-month contracts is $120,000 which amounts to $7500 per month. This amount reflects a $500 per month reduction from the previous federal lobbying contract. Countywide (DW) Background and Justification: For the past 11 years, Palm Beach County has had a single federal lobbying contract with US Strategies. The firm provided good Washington D.C. representation for Palm Beach County over that period of time. During that time, the County did not go out for an RFP to explore new opportunities for federal representation. Earlier this year, the County posted an RFP for federal lobbying representation. On Friday, April 15, 2011, the Federal Lobbying Selection Committee met to review nine responses to RFP #11- 033/SC. After scoring the responses, the Selection Committee requested an oral follow up with the top four firms responding to the request. The cutoff was determined by selecting those firms that cumulatively scored over 200 points in the initial evaluation. The Selection Committee met again on Friday, April 22, 2011, for an oral presentation in which the top four respondents were given 20 minutes via a conference call to respond to five predetermined questions. (Continued on Page 3) Attachments: 1. Federal Contract for Becker & Poliakoff 2. Federal Contract for Alcalde & Fay 3. Budget Availability Statements (1,2, and 3) . Recommended by: 1~.AJ!i~ oJ•l•l Approved By: ~Date II. FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS A. Five Year Summary of Fiscal Impact: N/A Fiscal Years 20 10/11 20 11/12 20 12/13 20-- 20 Capital -- Expenditures Operating Costs 22 500 7 500 1 901000 1 -- External Revenues Program Income (County) -- In-Kind Match (County) -- NET FISCAL IMPACT 22 500 7 500 1 901000 1 -- No. ADDITIONAL FTE -- POSITIONS (Cumulative) Is Item Included In Current Budget? Yes X No Budget Account No.: Fund various Department Unit Object Reporting Category B. Recommended Sources of Funds/Summary of Fiscal Impact: FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 Airports 4100-120-1110-3101 $ 7,660 $30,600 $ 2,553 Palm Tran 1340-540-5160-3101 $ 7,660 $30,600 $ 2,553 Legislative Affairs 0001-645-6450-3101 $ 5,328 $21,312 $ 1,776 Water Utilities 4001-720-1110-3101 $ 1,852 $ 7,488 $ 618 C. Departmental Fiscal Review: III. REVIEW COMMENTS A. OFMB Fiscal and/or Contract Dev. and Control Comments: ·1 \ ri l \I ~ B. Legal Sufficiency: c-fh.t~ t{jh~ ~~fr <.vtV{ ttJV..r-- r4vr Lw ~v~ C. Other Department Review: Department Director REVISED 9/03 ADMFORMOl (THIS SUMMARY IS NOT TO BE USED AS A BASIS FOR PAYMENT.) Background and Justification: (Continued from Page I) The Selection Committee ranked the four respondents and Holland & Knight was the respondent that was cumulatively ranked as the top firm responding to the RFP. Becker & Poliakoff was ranked second and closely behind in the third ranking spot was Alcalde & Fay. The Committee felt Holland & Knight had a strong, professional team assigned to work on the Palm Beach County contract. Their expertise at the federal level positioned them to be effective advocates for Palm Beach County priorities in Washington DC. They had an innovative approach to identifying funding opportunities in federal agencies through their web based portal. There was a good balance of public and private sector clients that minimized potential conflicts of interest and a good ratio of consultants at the firm to balance the workload from our County and their other clients. The firm's local presence afforded an understanding of important issues on the County's legislative agenda. They have had a successful track record with their clients and put forth a good communication plan to report and track Palm Beach County's priorities. The Selection Committee unanimously recommended the award of the County's Federal Lobbying contract to Holland & Knight. In the following weeks as discussions began on the contract terms, it became evident that a conflict of interest existed as the City of West Palm Beach, who also retains Holland & Knight as their state and federal lobbying firm, objected to the firm representing both the City and the County. After several attempts to resolve those conflicts with the City, it became clear they would not be able to overcome the differences and the County had to proceed to the next highest ranked firms who responded to the RFP. The next highest ranked firm was Becker & Poliakoff followed by Alcalde & Fay. Only a couple of points separated the two firms in their rankings. As indicated in our selection committee notes, both firms were considered strong applicants and brought strengths that complemented one another. Becker & Poliakoff is a newer and growing firm in terms of Washington DC representation and has a smaller client base where Palm Beach County would receive a lot of individualized attention. Alcalde & Fay is a much larger firm with a lot of public sector clients and a strong track record of achieving results for their clients as well as a strong grant assistance program that would be an asset to the county's current grant writing program. Our rationale to contract with both firms is to take advantage of the complimentary skill sets and strengths that we believe will greatly benefit our lobbying efforts in Washington DC. We have since negotiated an equal contract with both firms at a rate of $45,000/year for a total of $90,000, approximately $6,000 less than our current federal lobbying contract. The agreement on this agenda item is for a contract of $60,000 for each firm per the RFP which allowed for an initial 16-month contract (a term that included the remaining balance of our previous federal contract plus 12 months for the next year) and allows for 12-month renewals of the contract over the next three years. Those contracts also stipulate the issues each firm will work on for the county both in a lead and in a shared responsibility role. This will enable us to more effectively evaluate our success on some of the County priority issues. CONTRACT FOR FEDERAL LOBBYIST SERVICES (Contract No. 11-033/SC) This Contract No. 11-033/SC is made as of this __ day of ________, 2011, by and between Palm Beach County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, by and through its Board of Commissioners, hereinafter referred to as the COUNTY, and Becker & Poliakoff, P.A., 1155 F Street, Suite 150, Washington, D.C. 20004, a corporation authorized to do business in the State of Florida, hereinafter referred to as the CONSUL TANT. In consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, the COUNTY and the CONSUL TANT agree as follows: ARTICLE 1 - SERVICES The CONSULTANT's responsibility under this Contract is to provide federal lobbyist services to the Legislative Affairs Department in accordance with Exhibit A, Scope of Work/Services, and Exhibit B, CONSUL TANT's proposal dated April 6, 2011, both of which are attached hereto and incorporated herein. The COUNTY's representative/liaison during the performance of this Contract shall be Todd Bonlarron, Director, Legislative Affairs Department, telephone number (561) 355- 3451 or designee. The CONSULTANT's representative/liaison during the performance of this Contract shall be Omar Franco, telephone number (202) 731-3401. ARTICLE 2 - ORDER OF PRECEDENCE Conflicting provisions hereof, if any, shall prevail in the following descending order of precedence: (1) the provisions of the Contract, including Exhibit A, Scope of Work/Services; (2) the provisions of RFP No. 11-033/SC and all Amendments thereto, which are incorporated into and made a part of this Contract; (3) Exhibit B, CONSUL TANT's proposal dated March 30, 2011; (4) Exhibit C, Schedule of Payments; and (5) all other documents, if any, cited herein or incorporated herein by reference. ARTICLE 3 - SCHEDULE The CONSULTANT shall commence services on July 1, 2011, and complete all services by October 31, 2012, with three (3) one (1) year options for renewal at the sole discretion of the COUNTY. Reports and other items shall be delivered and/or completed in accordance with Exhibit A. 1 Attachment# -------I ARTICLE 4- PAYMENTS TO CONSULTANT A. The total amount to be paid by the COUNTY under this Contract for all services and materials shall not exceed a total contract amount of Sixty Thousand Dollars ($60,000.00). The CONSULTANT will bill the COUNTY on a monthly basis for equal monthly payments of Three Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Dollars ($3,750.00) for sixteen (16) months, for services rendered toward the completion of the Scope of Work/Services.
Recommended publications

  • Clarendon School Leaders Preparing to Share Services

    White House’s top lawyer is leaving THURSDAY, AUGUST 30, 2018 75 CENTS Trump praises McGahn, who has played key role in many issues SERVING SOUTH CAROLINA SINCE OCTOBER 15, 1894 BY KEN THOMAS and ZEKE MILLER Wednesday. had nothing to do with his inter- McGahn’s exit continues the views with the special counsel in- 3 SECTIONS, 22 PAGES | VOL. 123, NO. 224 The Associated Press churn of top officials as the admin- vestigating possible Trump cam- WASHINGTON — White House istration sets records for turnover paign collusion with Russia in the IN TODAY’S EDITION Counsel Don McGahn, a conse- and the White House struggles to 2016 election. quential insider in President Don- fill key vacancies. Pressed by reporters, Trump ald Trump’s legal storms and suc- Unlike some less-amiable separa- said he had approved the attor- cesses and a key figure in the ad- tions, however, Trump praised Mc- ney’s interviews and was uncon- ministration’s handling of the Rus- Gahn as “a really good guy” who cerned about anything McGahn sia investigation, will be leaving in has done “an excellent job.” the fall, the president announced Trump said McGahn’s departure SEE McGAHN, PAGE A6 LABOR From 8 felonies to successful Sumter DAY 2018 BAIL BONDSMAN ‘I use what I know to help people along the way. All I ask is you show up to court.’ Kudos to those who work hard to better their communities Women in the workplace, reducing stress and more C1 TECHNOLOGY Streaming service offerings keep growing B6 DEATHS, B4 Darwin Wilbern Baird Frances Elizabeth Corbett Baird George Weston Witherspoon Bernard L.

  • 103 Suspected 9-11 Criminal Coconspirators George W

    103 Suspected 9-11 Criminal Coconspirators George W. Bush — eldest son of Bush crime family; guilty of election fraud in 2000, 2004; guilty of war crimes, war profiteering, treason, crimes against humanity; likely signed-off on 9-11 plot Dick Cheney — former PNAC member; former chairman of CFR; guilty of war profiteering, treason; was in bunker on 9- 11 directing several “war games”; lied to 9-11 Omission Commission about timing of 9-11 activities Donald Rumsfeld — former Secretary of War and PNAC member; close friend of Cheney; was at Pentagon on 9-11; once slipped and said “when that missile hit the Pentagon” Paul Wolfowitz — Deputy Secretary of War on 9-11; “dual citizen” of US and Israel; Zionist; investigated for spying for Israel; former PNAC member; chief architect of Iraq war; forced to resign in World Bank scandal Richard Perle — former assistant Secretary of War, chairman War Policy Board, and PNAC member; “dual citizen” of US and Israel; Zionist; allegedly gave $100,000 to head of Pakistan’s ISI, Mahmoud Ahmad; nicknamed “Prince of Darkness” Douglas Feith — effectively in command, with Wolfowitz, of War Department on 9- 11; Undersecretary of War for Policy; “dual citizen” of US and Israel; Zionist; investigated for spying for Israel; former PNAC member Dov Zakheim — Pentagon comptroller when trillion dollars reported missing on 9-10-01; “dual citizen” of US and Israel; Zionist; Shul Rabbi; former CFR member; former CEO of fly-by-remote manufacturer; reputed 9-11 mastermind George Tenet — director of the CIA on 9- 11; was awarded
  • 2020 0227 Tedards Opinion

    2020 0227 Tedards Opinion

    (1 of 125) Case: 19-16308, 02/27/2020, ID: 11610659, DktEntry: 49-1, Page 1 of 68 FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT WILLIAM PRICE TEDARDS, JR.; No. 19-16308 MONICA WNUK; BARRY HESS; LAWRENCE LILIEN; ROSS TRUMBLE, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellants, 2:18-cv-04241- DJH v. DOUG DUCEY, Governor of Arizona, OPINION in his official capacity; MARTHA MCSALLY, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Diane J. Humetewa, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted November 13, 2019 Pasadena, California Filed February 27, 2020 Before: MILAN D. SMITH, JR., ERIC D. MILLER, and DANIEL P. COLLINS, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge Milan D. Smith, Jr.; Concurrence by Judge Collins (2 of 125) Case: 19-16308, 02/27/2020, ID: 11610659, DktEntry: 49-1, Page 2 of 68 2 TEDARDS V. DUCEY SUMMARY* Civil Rights The panel affirmed the district court’s dismissal of an action, brought following the death of Arizona Senator John McCain in 2018, challenging the constitutionality of an Arizona statute that governs appointments and elections in the aftermath of a vacancy in the United States Senate. Senator McCain died on August 25, 2018, three days before the primary election. Over four years remained in his Senate term. Consistent with the requirements of Arizona Revised Statute § 16-222(D), as amended, Governor Doug Ducey (Republican) issued a writ of election to fill Senator McCain’s vacant seat in November 2020, and appointed a temporary Senator until the winner of the November 2020 election assumed office.
  • For Mccain, Self-Confidence on Ethics Poses Its Own Risk

    For Mccain, Self-Confidence on Ethics Poses Its Own Risk

    1 February 21, 2008 THE LONG RUN For McCain, Self-Confidence on Ethics Poses Its Own Risk By JIM RUTENBERG, MARILYN W. THOMPSON, DAVID D. KIRKPATRICK and STEPHEN LABATON WASHINGTON – Early in Senator John McCain‘s first run for the White House eight years ago, waves of anxiety swept through his small circle of advisers. A female lobbyist had been turning up with him at fund-raisers, visiting his offices and accompanying him on a client‘s corporate jet. Convinced the relationship had become romantic, some of his top advisers intervened to protect the candidate from himself – instructing staff members to block the woman‘s access, privately warning her away and repeatedly confronting him, several people involved in the campaign said on the condition of anonymity. When news organizations reported that Mr. McCain had written letters to government regulators on behalf of the lobbyist‘s client, the former campaign associates said, some aides feared for a time that attention would fall on her involvement. Mr. McCain, 71, and the lobbyist, Vicki Iseman, 40, both say they never had a romantic relationship. But to his advisers, even the appearance of a close bond with a lobbyist whose clients often had business before the Senate committee Mr. McCain led threatened the story of redemption and rectitude that defined his political identity. It had been just a decade since an official favor for a friend with regulatory problems had nearly ended Mr. McCain‘s political career by ensnaring him in the Keating Five scandal. In the years that followed, he reinvented himself as the scourge of special interests, a crusader for stricter ethics and campaign finance rules, a man of honor chastened by a brush with shame.
  • Links to Mccain

    Links to Mccain

    Name: Vicki Lee Iseman DOB: October 1967 Home State: Pennsylvania Education: Indiana University in Pennsylvania, class of 1990 Links To McCain McCain’s Close Relationship With Lobbyist Worried Advisers On 2000 Campaign. Advisers from McCain’s 2000 campaign for president were worried about the extent of a relationship between McCain and Vicki Iseman. According to the New York Times, “A female lobbyist had been turning up with him at fund-raisers, visiting his offices and accompanying him on a client’s corporate jet. Convinced the relationship had become romantic, some of his top advisers intervened to protect the candidate from himself — instructing staff members to block the woman’s access, privately warning her away and repeatedly confronting him, several people involved in the campaign said on the condition of anonymity.” [New York Times, 2/21/08] • McCain’s Advisers Noticed A ‘Close Bond’ Between McCain And Iseman. According to the New York Times, McCain and Iseman “both say they never had a romantic relationship. But to his advisers, even the appearance of a close bond with a lobbyist whose clients often had business before the Senate committee Mr. McCain led threatened the story of redemption and rectitude that defined his political identity.” [New York Times, 2/21/08] • McCain Was ‘Blinded By Confidence.’ According to the New York Times, “Even as he has vowed to hold himself to the highest ethical standards, his confidence in his own integrity has sometimes seemed to blind him to potentially embarrassing conflicts of interest.” [New York Times, 2/21/08] • Iseman Was ‘Always Around’ McCain’s 2000 Campaign.
  • Extensions of Remarks E831 EXTENSIONS of REMARKS

    Extensions of Remarks E831 EXTENSIONS of REMARKS

    May 25, 2000 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD Ð Extensions of Remarks E831 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS RIVERDALE COMMUNITY CENTER and women have to offer. Truly, it is one of I was shocked at the impudence of the Ger- the most challenging and rewarding under- man government in its application of the HON. ELIOT L. ENGEL takings of their lives. Hague Convention. But, I was even more out- Kyle is an outstanding student who brings a OF NEW YORK raged at the failure of our own government to special mix of leadership, service, and dedica- act as an aggressive advocate on behalf of IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES tion to the incoming class of West Point ca- American parents. The U.S. State Department Wednesday, May 24, 2000 dets. While attending Port Clinton High left him to fend for himself, which his ex-wife Mr. ENGEL. Mr. Speaker, nearly three dec- School, Kyle has attained a grade point aver- appeared to have all of Germany fighting for ades ago the rise in juvenile delinquency led age of 3.929, which places him seventh in his her. I wrote to Secretary Albright, our Ambas- to the creation of the Riverdale Community class of one hundred ninety-three students. sador to Germany, and others seeking assist- Center. It gave a growing number of teen- Kyle is a member of the National Honor Soci- ance, but my efforts were rebuffed as well. agers, who were unsupervised after school ety and has received the Port Clinton Kiwanis This happens to thousands of American par- because their parents worked, a place to go.
  • Federal Election Commission (FEC)

    Federal Election Commission (FEC)

    Description of document: Federal Election Commission (FEC) records provided to Chairman Darrell Issa, House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, concerning the administration of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 2010-2011 Requested: 10-December-2011 Released date: 19-March-2012 Posted date: 12-October-2015 Source of document: Federal Election Commission Attn: FOIA Requester Service Center Room 408 999 E Street, NW Washington, DC 20463 Fax: (202) 219-1043 Email: [email protected] Note: This is one of several files on the same subject for various agencies available on governmentattic.org. See: http://www.governmentattic.org/5docs/chairmanIssa.htm The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website.