DOCSLIB.ORG

Common Name: ZINC PHOSPHIDE HAZARD SUMMARY

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Common Name: ZINC PHOSPHIDE HAZARD SUMMARY Common Name: ZINC PHOSPHIDE CAS Number: 1314-84-7 DOT Number: UN 1714 RTK Substance number: 2041 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: May 2000 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- HAZARD SUMMARY * Zinc Phosphide can affect you when breathed in. * Contact can irritate the skin and eyes. * If you think you are experiencing any work-related health * Breathing Zinc Phosphide can irritate the nose and throat. problems, see a doctor trained to recognize occupational * Breathing Zinc Phosphide can irritate the lungs causing diseases. Take this Fact Sheet with you. coughing and/or shortness of breath. Higher exposures can cause a build-up of fluid in the lungs (pulmonary WORKPLACE EXPOSURE LIMITS edema), a medical emergency, with severe shortness of No occupational exposure limits have been established for breath. Zinc Phosphide. This does not mean that this substance is * Exposure to Zinc Phosphide can cause nausea, vomiting, not harmful. Safe work practices should always be followed. diarrhea and abdominal pain. * Zinc Phosphide can cause headache, fatigue, dizziness, WAYS OF REDUCING EXPOSURE tremor, seizures and coma. * Where possible, enclose operations and use local exhaust * Zinc Phosphide can cause irregular heartbeat. ventilation at the site of chemical release. If local exhaust * Zinc Phosphide may damage the liver and kidneys. ventilation or enclosure is not used, respirators should be * Zinc Phosphide is a FLAMMABLE chemical and a worn. DANGEROUS FIRE HAZARD. * Wear protective work clothing. * Wash thoroughly immediately after exposure to Zinc IDENTIFICATION Phosphide and at the end of the workshift. Zinc Phosphide is a dark grey solid with a “decaying fish” * Post hazard and warning information in the work area. In odor. It is used as rat and mice poison and in baits for the addition, as part of an ongoing education and training control of ground squirrels and prairie dogs. effort, communicate all information on the health and safety hazards of Zinc Phosphide to potentially exposed REASON FOR CITATION workers. * Zinc Phosphide is on the Hazardous Substance List because it is cited by DOT, DEP, HHAG, NFPA and EPA. * This chemical is on the Special Health Hazard Substance List because it is FLAMMABLE. * Definitions are provided on page 5. HOW TO DETERMINE IF YOU ARE BEING EXPOSED The New Jersey Right to Know Act requires most employers to label chemicals in the workplace and requires public employers to provide their employees with information and training concerning chemical hazards and controls. The federal OSHA Hazard Communication Standard, 1910.1200, requires private employers to provide similar training and information to their employees. * Exposure to hazardous substances should be routinely evaluated. This may include collecting personal and area air samples. You can obtain copies of sampling results from your employer. You have a legal right to this information under OSHA 1910.1020. ZINC PHOSPHIDE page 2 of 6 This Fact Sheet is a summary source of information of all Any evaluation should include a careful history of past and potential and most severe health hazards that may result from present symptoms with an exam. Medical tests that look for exposure. Duration of exposure, concentration of the damage already done are not a substitute for controlling substance and other factors will affect your susceptibility to exposure. any of the potential effects described below. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Request copies of your medical testing. You have a legal right to this information under OSHA 1910.1020. HEALTH HAZARD INFORMATION Mixed Exposures Acute Health Effects * Because smoking can cause heart disease, as well as lung The following acute (short-term) health effects may occur cancer, emphysema, and other respiratory problems, it may immediately or shortly after exposure to Zinc Phosphide: worsen respiratory conditions caused by chemical exposure. Even if you have smoked for a long time, * Contact can irritate the skin and eyes. stopping now will reduce your risk of developing health * Breathing Zinc Phosphide can irritate the nose and throat. problems. * Breathing Zinc Phosphide can irritate the lungs causing * Because more than light alcohol consumption can cause coughing and/or shortness of breath. Higher exposures liver damage, drinking alcohol can increase the liver can cause a build-up of fluid in the lungs (pulmonary damage caused by Zinc Phosphide. edema), a medical emergency, with severe shortness of breath. WORKPLACE CONTROLS AND PRACTICES * Exposure to Zinc Phosphide can cause nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and abdominal pain. Unless a less toxic chemical can be substituted for a hazardous * Zinc Phosphide can cause headache, fatigue, dizziness, substance, ENGINEERING CONTROLS are the most tremor, seizures and coma. effective way of reducing exposure. The best protection is to enclose operations and/or provide local exhaust ventilation at Chronic Health Effects the site of chemical release. Isolating operations can also The following chronic (long-term) health effects can occur at reduce exposure. Using respirators or protective equipment is some time after exposure to Zinc Phosphide and can last for less effective than the controls mentioned above, but is months or years: sometimes necessary. Cancer Hazard In evaluating the controls present in your workplace, consider: * According to the information presently available to the (1) how hazardous the substance is, (2) how much of the New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services, substance is released into the workplace and (3) whether Zinc Phosphide has not been tested for its ability to cause harmful skin or eye contact could occur. Special controls cancer in animals. should be in place for highly toxic chemicals or when significant skin, eye, or breathing exposures are possible. Reproductive Hazard * According to the information presently available to the In addition, the following controls are recommended: New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services, Zinc Phosphide has not been tested for its ability to affect * Where possible, automatically transfer Zinc Phosphide reproduction. from drums or other storage containers to process containers. Other Long-Term Effects * Before entering a confined space where Zinc Phosphide * Zinc Phosphide can cause irregular heartbeat. may be present, check to make sure that an explosive * Zinc Phosphide may damage the liver and kidneys. concentration does not exist. MEDICAL Good WORK PRACTICES can help to reduce hazardous exposures. The following work practices are recommended: Medical Testing * Workers whose clothing has been contaminated by Zinc If symptoms develop or overexposure is suspected, the Phosphide should change into clean clothing promptly. following are recommended: * Do not take contaminated work clothes home. Family members could be exposed. * Consider chest x-ray after acute overexposure. * Contaminated work clothes should be laundered by * Liver and kidney function tests. individuals who have been informed of the hazards of * EKG. exposure to Zinc Phosphide. * Eye wash fountains should be provided in the immediate work area for emergency use. ZINC PHOSPHIDE page 3 of 6 * If there is the possibility of skin exposure, emergency * NIOSH has established new testing and certification shower facilities should be provided. requirements for negative pressure, air purifying, * On skin contact with Zinc Phosphide, immediately wash particulate filter and filtering facepiece respirators. The or shower to remove the chemical. At the end of the filter classifications of dust/mist/fume, paint spray or workshift, wash any areas of the body that may have pesticide prefilters, and filters for radon daughters, have contacted Zinc Phosphide, whether or not known skin been replaced with the N, R, and P series. Each series has contact has occurred. three levels of filtering efficiency: 95%, 99%, and 99.9%. * Do not eat, smoke, or drink where Zinc Phosphide is Check with your safety equipment supplier or your handled, processed, or stored, since the chemical can be respirator manufacturer to determine which respirator is swallowed. Wash hands carefully before eating, drinking, appropriate for your facility. smoking, or using the toilet. * If while wearing a filter or cartridge respirator you can * Use a vacuum to reduce dust during clean-up. smell, taste, or otherwise detect Zinc Phosphide, or if while wearing particulate filters abnormal resistance to PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT breathing is experienced, or eye irritation occurs while wearing a full facepiece respirator, leave the area WORKPLACE CONTROLS ARE BETTER THAN immediately. Check to make sure the respirator-to-face PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT. However, for seal is still good. If it is, replace the filter or cartridge. If some jobs (such as outside work, confined space entry, jobs the seal is no longer good, you may need a new respirator. done only once in a while, or jobs done while workplace * Be sure to consider all potential exposures in your controls are being installed), personal protective equipment workplace. You may need a combination of filters, may be appropriate. prefilters or cartridges to protect against different forms of a chemical (such as vapor and mist) or against a mixture of OSHA 1910.132 requires employers to determine the chemicals. appropriate personal protective equipment for each hazard and * Where
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Environmental Properties of Chemicals Volume 2
    1 t ENVIRONMENTAL 1 PROTECTION Esa Nikunen . Riitta Leinonen Birgit Kemiläinen • Arto Kultamaa Environmental properties of chemicals Volume 2 1 O O O O O O O O OO O OOOOOO Ol OIOOO FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE • EDITA Esa Nikunen e Riitta Leinonen Birgit Kemiläinen • Arto Kultamaa Environmental properties of chemicals Volume 2 HELSINKI 1000 OlO 00000001 00000000000000000 Th/s is a second revfsed version of Environmental Properties of Chemica/s, published by VAPK-Pub/ishing and Ministry of Environment, Environmental Protection Department as Research Report 91, 1990. The pubiication is also available as a CD ROM version: EnviChem 2.0, a PC database runniny under Windows operating systems. ISBN 951-7-2967-2 (publisher) ISBN 952-7 1-0670-0 (co-publisher) ISSN 1238-8602 Layout: Pikseri Julkaisupalvelut Cover illustration: Jussi Hirvi Edita Ltd. Helsinki 2000 Environmental properties of chemicals Volume 2 _____ _____________________________________________________ Contents . VOLUME ONE 1 Contents of the report 2 Environmental properties of chemicals 3 Abbreviations and explanations 7 3.1 Ways of exposure 7 3.2 Exposed species 7 3.3 Fffects________________________________ 7 3.4 Length of exposure 7 3.5 Odour thresholds 8 3.6 Toxicity endpoints 9 3.7 Other abbreviations 9 4 Listofexposedspecies 10 4.1 Mammais 10 4.2 Plants 13 4.3 Birds 14 4.4 Insects 17 4.5 Fishes 1$ 4.6 Mollusca 22 4.7 Crustaceans 23 4.8 Algae 24 4.9 Others 25 5 References 27 Index 1 List of chemicals in alphabetical order - 169 Index II List of chemicals in CAS-number order
    [Show full text]
  • Efficacy of 3 In-Burrow Treatments to Control Black-Tailed Prairie Dogs
    EFFICACY OF 3 JN-BURROW TREATMENTS TO CONTROL BLACK-TAJLED PRAIRIE DOGS CHARLES D. LEE, Department of Animal Science, Kansas State University Research and Extension, Manhattan, KS, USA JEFF LEFLORE , East Cheyenne County Pest Control, Cheyenne Wells , CO, USA Abstract: Management of prairie dog ( Cynomys ludovicianus) movement by colony expansion or dispersal may involve the use of toxicants to reduce local populations. Hazards associated with the use of toxicants cause concern for non-target species. Applying the bait in-burrow should reduce the primary exposure of the toxicants to non-target wildlife. Some literature suggests prairie dogs will not consume bait when applied in the burrow. In this trial we compared efficacy of Rozol ® (chlorophacinone), Kaput-D Prairie Dog Bait ® (diphacinone), 2% zinc phosphide oats applied in-burrow and 2% zinc phosphide oats applied on the surface. Results are reported as change in prairie dog activity. Key words: chlorophacinone , control, Cynomys ludovicianus, diphacinone, in-burrow, management , prairie dog, toxicant , zinc phosphide Proceedings of the I 2'h Wildlife Damage Management Conference (D.L. Nolte , W.M. Arjo, D.H. Stalman, Eds). 2007 INTRODUCTION This type of controversy has lead to scrutiny Control of black-tailed prame dogs of all types of control , especially the use of (Cynomys ludovicianus) is controversial on toxicants . Although there are numerous the Great Plains. Prairie dogs have been control techniques for prairie dogs, many controlled on rangeland for many years landowner s are dissatisfied with their largely with the use of toxicants applied consistency of efficacy and ease of use . above ground (Witmer and Fagerstone Most of the literature on black-tailed 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • Sound Management of Pesticides and Diagnosis and Treatment Of
    * Revision of the“IPCS - Multilevel Course on the Safe Use of Pesticides and on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Presticide Poisoning, 1994” © World Health Organization 2006 All rights reserved. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters. All reasonable precautions have been taken by the World Health Organization to verify the information contained in this publication. However, the published material is being distributed without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. The responsibility for the interpretation and use of the material lies with the reader. In no event shall the World Health Organization be liable for damages arising from its use. CONTENTS Preface Acknowledgement Part I. Overview 1. Introduction 1.1 Background 1.2 Objectives 2. Overview of the resource tool 2.1 Moduledescription 2.2 Training levels 2.3 Visual aids 2.4 Informationsources 3. Using the resource tool 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Training trainers 3.2.1 Organizational aspects 3.2.2 Coordinator’s preparation 3.2.3 Selection of participants 3.2.4 Before training trainers 3.2.5 Specimen module 3.3 Trainers 3.3.1 Trainer preparation 3.3.2 Selection of participants 3.3.3 Organizational aspects 3.3.4 Before a course 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Implications of Using Zinc Phosphide to Replace Endrin in Apple Orchards
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center Eastern Pine and Meadow Vole Symposia for March 1977 Economic Implications of Using Zinc Phosphide To Replace Endrin in Apple Orchards Walter L. Ferguson Economic Research Service Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/voles Part of the Environmental Health and Protection Commons Ferguson, Walter L., "Economic Implications of Using Zinc Phosphide To Replace Endrin in Apple Orchards" (1977). Eastern Pine and Meadow Vole Symposia. 116. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/voles/116 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Eastern Pine and Meadow Vole Symposia by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. 33 Economic Implications of Using Zinc Phosphide To Replace Endrin in Apple Orchards 11 Walter L. Ferguson II Consideration is being given to suspend or restrict the use of endrin for controlling mice in orchards. If endrin were not available for this use, State extension and experiment station personnel in 6 Eastern States and 2 Western States estimated that apple production losses would increase from mice injury on 33,400 endrin-treated bearing acres, (12,500 acres in the Eastern States and 20,900 acres in the Western States). The 6 Eastern States include Georgia, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia and West Virginia: the 2 Western States are Idaho and Washington. Estimates of production changes without endrin were made assuming zinc phosphide is the only feasible Federally registered chemical alternative to endrin.
    [Show full text]
  • RRAC Guidelines on Anticoagulant Rodenticide Resistance Management Editor: Rodenticide Resistance Action Committee (RRAC) of Croplife International Aim
    RRAC guidelines on Anticoagulant Rodenticide Resistance Management Editor: Rodenticide Resistance Action Committee (RRAC) of CropLife International Aim This document provides guidance to advisors, national authorities, professionals, practitioners and others on the nature of anticoagulant resistance in rodents, the identification of anticoagulant resistance, strategies for rodenticide application that will avoid the development of resistance and the management of resistance where it occurs. The Rodenticide Resistance Action Committee (RRAC) is a working group within the framework of CropLife International. Participating companies include: Bayer CropScience, BASF, LiphaTech S. A., PelGar, Rentokil Initial, Syngenta and Zapi. Senior technical specialists, with specific expertise in rodenticides, represent their companies on this committee. The RRAC is grateful to the following co-authors: Stefan Endepols, Alan Buckle, Charlie Eason, Hans-Joachim Pelz, Adrian Meyer, Philippe Berny, Kristof Baert and Colin Prescott. Photos provided by Stefan Endepols. Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 2 2. Classification and history of rodenticide compounds ..............................................................................................3 3. Mode of action of anticoagulant rodenticides, resistance mechanisms, and resistance mutations ......................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Rodenticidal Effects of Zinc Phosphide and Strychnine of Nontarget Species
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Great Plains Wildlife Damage Control Workshop Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center Proceedings for April 1987 Rodenticidal Effects of Zinc Phosphide and Strychnine of Nontarget Species Daniel W. Uresk Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Rapid City, South Dakota Rudy M. King Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Rapid City, South Dakota Anthony D. Apa South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Michele S. Deisch South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Raymond L. Linder South Dakota Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, South Dakota State University - Brookings Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/gpwdcwp Part of the Environmental Health and Protection Commons Uresk, Daniel W.; King, Rudy M.; Apa, Anthony D.; Deisch, Michele S.; and Linder, Raymond L., "Rodenticidal Effects of Zinc Phosphide and Strychnine of Nontarget Species" (1987). Great Plains Wildlife Damage Control Workshop Proceedings. 102. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/gpwdcwp/102 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Plains Wildlife Damage Control Workshop Proceedings by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Rodenticidal Effects of Zinc Phosphide and Strychnine on Nontarget Species1 Daniel W. Uresk, Rudy M. King, Anthony D. Apa, Michele S. Deisch, and Raymond L. Linder Abstract.—When three rodenticide treatments—zinc phosphide (prebaited) and strychnine (both with and without prebait)—were evaluated, zinc phosphide was the most effec- tive in reducing active burrows of prairie dogs; but, it also resulted in a reduction in deer mouse densities.
    [Show full text]
  • (Mrls) for Phosphane and Phosphide Salts According to Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005
    REASONED OPINION APPROVED: 25 November 2015 PUBLISHED: 04 December 2015 doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4325 Review of the existing maximum residue levels (MRLs) for phosphane and phosphide salts according to Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) Abstract According to Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has reviewed the maximum residue levels (MRLs) currently established at European level for phosphane; this residue may result from the use of phosphane itself or from the use of certain phosphide salts. In order to assess the occurrence of phosphane residues in plants, processed commodities, rotational crops and livestock, EFSA considered the conclusions derived in the framework of Directive 91/414/EEC, the MRLs established by the Codex Alimentarius Commission as well as the European authorisations reported by Member States (incl. the supporting residues data). Based on the assessment of the available data, MRL proposals were derived and a consumer risk assessment was carried out. Although no apparent risk to consumers was identified, some information required by the regulatory framework was missing. Hence, the consumer risk assessment is considered indicative only and some MRL proposals derived by EFSA still require further consideration by risk managers. © European Food Safety Authority, 2015 Keywords: phosphane, phosphide, MRL review, Regulation (EC) No 396/2005, consumer risk assessment, fumigant Requestor: European Commission Question number: EFSA-Q-2009-00095; EFSA-Q-2009-00151; EFSA-Q-2009-00157; EFSA-Q-2009-00173; EFSA-Q-2012-00944 Correspondence: [email protected] www.efsa.europa.eu/efsajournal EFSA Journal 2015;13(12):4325 Review of the existing MRLs for phosphane and phosphide salts Acknowledgement: EFSA wishes to thank the rapporteur Member State Germany for the preparatory work on this scientific output.
    [Show full text]
  • Acute Oral Toxicity and Repellency of 933 Chemicals to House and Deer Mice
    U.S. Department of Agriculture U.S. Government Publication Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Wildlife Services Archiv-of Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 14, 111-129 (1985) Environmental ontamination C ... ■ nd I oxicolagy © 1985 Springer-Verlag New York Inc. Acute Oral Toxicity and Repellency of 933 Chemicals to House and Deer Mice E. W. Schafer, Jr. and W. A. Bowles, Jr. U.S. Department of Interior - Fish and Wildlife Service, Denver Wildlife Research Center, Building 16 - Denver Federal Center, Denver, Colorado 80225 Abstract. Five individual bioassay repellency or deer mice and white (house) mice. Our purpose is toxicity variables were estimated or determined for to make available these generally unpublished test deer .mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) and house results so that they can be referenced or used by mice (Mus musculus) under laboratory conditions. the various public, private, and governmental ALD's (Approximate Lethal Doses) or LD50's of groups that may require this information. 230 chemicals to deer mice are presented, as are food reduction (FR) values (3-day feeding test as a 2.0% treatment rate) for white wheat seeds (Tri­ Methods ticum aestivum) for 696 chemicals and Douglas fir seeds (Pseudotsuga menziesii) for 81 chemicals. A The chemicals included in the tests were technical or analytical similar repellency evaluation (REP) using a 5-day grade pesticides and other commercially available or experi­ mental chemicals. They were purchased from various commer­ test with white wheat seeds at a 2.0% treatment rate cial sources or contributed by cooperating chemical companies. was conducted with house mice and the results for For presentation purposes, they have been arranged by Chemical 347 chemicals are presented.
    [Show full text]
  • Rational Design of Zinc Phosphide Heterojunction Photovoltaics
    Rational Design of Zinc Phosphide Heterojunction Photovoltaics Thesis by Jeffrey Paul Bosco In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California 2014 (Defended May 30, 2014) ii © 2014 Jeffrey Paul Bosco All Rights Reserved i ii \Look here, I have succeeded at last in fetching some gold from the sun." { Gustav Kirchhoff (After his banker questioned the value of investigating gold in the Fraunhofer lines of the sun and Kirchhoff handing him over a medal he was awarded for his investigations.) iii iv Acknowledgements First and foremost I would like to thank my research advisor, Prof. Harry Atwater, for the tremendous amount of support he has provided during my tenure at Caltech. I first met Harry during a chemical engineering recruiting trip. He handed me a copy of Scientific American, blasted me with energy and excitement over the future of plasmonics (of course I had never even heard of a surface plasmon at that point), and rushed off! Little did I know that I would be working in the Atwater labs only six months later and Harry would meet me with the same energy and enthusiasm regarding the topic of zinc phosphide photovoltaics. Five years later and he is still an incredible source of support, advice, and interesting scientific ideas. Thank you Harry. I am also indebted to the members of my thesis committee, Prof. Nathan Lewis, Prof. Kostantinos Giapis, and Prof. Richard Flagan. In particular, Nate has been an excellent scientific resource over the past couple of years. I clearly remember handing Nate a draft of my first (and in my eyes perfectly rigorous) scientific manuscript, only to have it returned a week later, so thor- oughly plastered with corrections written in red ink that it looked like someone had literally ripped an artery right out of the paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Manual on Rat Control
    NAVMED 518 Manual on RAT CONTROL American Mainland and Pacific Region Bureau of Medicine and Surgery. Navy Department Washington, D. C. 19 4 4 INTRODUCTION The common house rats and the semi-wild forms are important reservoirs of diseases that affect man. Damage to all types of materiel is a secondary but important reason for controlling rats in proximity to military bases, camps, and installations and aboard ships. Effective control requires some knowledge of species and habits of the rat population. DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION OF IMPORTANT RODENTS Three species of common house rats occur generally on the American main- land. In addition to these forms, several other species occur in the Pacific area. The semi-wild forms which live in the jungle or forest and waste-land have little contact with man and are relatively unimportant in rodent control; military oc- cupation and operations may change this picture to some extent. The semi-do- mestic forms which will require consideration and control are briefly described. The KEY is supplied for the purpose of separating and classifying rats on the mainland and those in the Pacific area. The most important rats from the medi- cal and economic viewpoint are: - Rattus norvegicus - Norway (Brown) Rat. The Norway rat is fairly large, usually russet or grayish-brown on the back and sides, the underparts having a slight gray to yellowish-white color. This'rat is present wherever human habita- tion creates suitable harboring places and an adequate food supply. It is persis- tent and aggressive and lives in association with other rats. Due to its greater adaptability and on account of its habit of living on and in the ground; it is gener- ally the most noticeable and numerous species.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2014/0271932 A1 Rubel Et Al
    US 2014027 1932A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2014/0271932 A1 Rubel et al. (43) Pub. Date: Sep. 18, 2014 (54) RODENTICIDAL COMPOSITION AND Publication Classification METHOD (51) Int. Cl. (71) Applicant: PIC Corporation/Pest Free Living, AOIN 59/00 (2006.01) Linden, NJ (US) (52) U.S. Cl. CPC ...................................... A0IN 59/00 (2013.01) (72) Inventors: Phyllis Rubel, Scotch Plains, NJ (US); USPC .......................................................... 424/717 Sidney Goldman, Verona, NJ (US); Bogdan Enache, Jersey City, NJ (US) (57) ABSTRACT A rodenticidal composition comprising a carbon dioxide (21) Appl. No.: 13/829,332 release agent and a carrier may be disclosed. A method of controlling rodents at a locus by applying the composition of (22) Filed: Mar 14, 2013 the disclosure may be disclosed. Patent Application Publication Sep. 18, 2014 US 2014/0271932 A1 9ISI I? 80I (S.97) US 2014/027 1932 A1 Sep. 18, 2014 RODENTCIDAL COMPOSITION AND 0007. In another embodiment of the present disclosure the METHOD carbonate salt and/or the bicarbonate salt may further com 0001. The present disclosure relates to a rodenticide or prise an ammonium cation. The nitrogen of the ammonium composition and method for controlling rodents, e.g. com cation may be substituted with from 1 to 4 substituents each of mensal rodents. which may be alkyl, phenyl, aryl, heteroaryl, or alkoxy-Sub 0002 The present disclosure may include a composition stituted alkyl. By the term alkyl may be generally meant lower comprising a rodenticidally effective amount of a carbon alkyl, that may be from C to C alkyl, or from C to Calkyl.
    [Show full text]
  • Eighth Great Plains Wildlife Damage Control Workshop Proceedings
    This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. Rodenticidal Effects of Zinc Phosphide and Strychnine on Nontarget Species1 Daniel W. Uresk, Rudy M. King, Anthony D. 2 Apa, Mlchele S. Deisch, and Raymond L. Linder Abstract.--When three rodenticide treatments--zinc phosphide (prebaited) and strychnine (both with and without prebait)--were evaluated, zinc phosphide was the most effec­ tive in reducing active burrows of prairie dogs; but, it also resulted in a reduction in deer mouse densities. One month after treatment, counts of fecal pellets of eastern cotton­ tails were greater on areas treated with strychnine without prebait than on sites treated with zinc phosphide. Eight months after treatment, no differences could be detected among rodenticides for either leporid. Horned lark densities were reduced 61% on sites treated with strychnine only. INTRODUCTION nontarget animals when zinc phosphide-treated grain bait was broadcast to control Richardson's ground Rodenticides have been used for prairie dog squirrels {Spermophilus richardsonii). control on the Great Plains since the late 1800's (Merriam 1902). Most recent prairie dog control Strychnine, used for prairie dog control since programs on federal, state, and private lands the late 1800's (Merriam 1902), has been reported consist of poisoning prairie dogs with zinc to present secondary hazards to nontarget animals phosphide on rolled oats after prebaiting with (Schitoskey 1975, Hegdal et al. 1981). Wood (1965) rolled oats (Schenbeck 1962). However, for more reported that densities of five rodent species than 70 years, little effort has been made to fluctuated independently over a 2-year period after evaluate rodenticide impacts on nontarget animals.
    [Show full text]