DOCSLIB.ORG

Mouse Control in Washington Orchards

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mouse Control in Washington Orchards Mouse Control in Washington Orchards • Protect Valuable Fruit Trees • Cut Economic Loss • Reduce Health Hazards EM 2650 Revised September 1977 In cooperation with the United States Department of Agriculture Issued in furtherance of the Acts of Mav 8 and June 30. 1914 bv the Washington State University Cooperative Exten-sion Service, J . 0. Young. Director Cooperative Extension Service. College of Agriculture, Washington State University. Pullman Mouse Control in Washington Orchards. Raymond E. Hunter, Grant-Adams area Extension agent Ronald B. Tukey, Extension horticulturist. Mice can cause extensive injury and even the Some are found only in other fruit-growing death of fruit trees. They gnaw and peel the regions of the country. Others do not feed on bark from the roots and trunk of the tree at or fruit trees. just below the groundline. These wounds can weaken the tree while also serving as points of It is the short-tailed meadow mouse (Microtus infection from various root rot diseases. When. sp) which causes the problem in Washington severely girdled, the trees die unless State. It is medium-sized, stout ( 1.5-2.0 ounces) bridge-grafted. with small, black, beadlike eyes and small, fur-covered ears. An important designating Preventing injury from mice requires a careful feature is its short tail (one-third of head and and regular monitoring of mouse populations body length), which is well-covered with hair and activity. This is particularly important in the (see Figure 1 ). late summer, fall, and winter when mouse populations are at their peak and alternate food The meadow mouse ranges in color from sources can be depleted. blackish to greyish, or it can be yellowish brown. Its fur is loose, rather long, and heavily Various cultural and management practices may interspersed with black guard hairs, all of which be used to reduce the hazard of injury. These give it a grizzled appearance. The color is darkest include placing mechanical guards around young on the back, which shades into gray, ash or buff trees, keeping the base of trees free of weeds and on the underpart. The tail is dusty-colored on grass, destroying natural covers around the the upper side and slightly paler below. The feet orchard and treating the orchard with do not have black guard hairs. rodenticides. The meadow mouse lives in an environment just There are three rodenticides and four basic above or below the soil surface. Here it forms an methods of applying them. Two of these extensive network of runways. It feeds on the chemicals are applied as baits. They may be succulent stems and roots of grasses, legumes, applied by hand or in a mechanical trail builder. and weeds along these paths. It nests just below They also may be scattered over the orchard the soil surface, in dense cover, often at the base floor. These baits are effective only for short of trees where there is little disturbance and periods of time after application and, therefore, good protection from its natural enemies: are effective primarily against mice already in hawks, owls, shrikes, snakes, badgers, and the orchard. skunks. Ground sprays with the insecticide endrin Its large appetite combined with prolific provide long-term or seasonal control over the breeding causes much of the problem. Each winter. Because of the hazard, these sprays mouse eats its weight in forage each day. In can should not be applied until late fall when harvest ·produce as many .as 8 to 10 litters each year operations are over, and all fruit on the ground with an average of 6 and up to 11 young per has been removed or destroyed. litter. The ne~ females become sexually mature and can begin breeding at just four weeks of age. DESCRIPTION, HABITS AND BREEDING CHARACTERISTICS OF MICE Mouse populations are cyclic both within and between years. Their number is lowest in the There are several different kinds of mice which spring and highest in the fall. Peaks in can be found in orchards and around trees. population occur approximately every four ROD.ENT S: P 1lCTt:lRJAl.. KEY TO SOME COMMON UNITED STATES GENERA Harold George Scott and Margery R. Borom I -------- 1- - I .At- tail almost naked, scaly..._, ,.lit' tail almost nakerl, annulatl"...._ ,.lit' tail hairy..._, large (9-lPlong) small (5-7•1ong) tail long tail short hair short hair long ~firf;(!? ' J II t:nI /lfi~ff ~~ -;- .;z. ~ !A ' ' . -- ·• ·-. - :.,..( - II Rattus Mus DOMESTIC HOUSE MICE , RATS r 1 ..tJIIt" tail bones longer than l/2 borly "'- ..tJI/t" tail bones shorter than 1/ 2 body...._ large (about 16•tong) small (7-9•tong) front feet enlarged front feet not enlarged ~ ........ Neotoma ~y~ Geomy~-East WOOD \\lUTE-FOOTED Thomomy~-West RATS MICE POCKET GOPHEHS ..tJI/t" tail bones longer than borly ..,.,_ .A- tail bones shorter than borly -..::---------------. tail bush) tail not bushy large (about ts•tong) small (about 9•long) very large (about 26•1ong) Sciurus · Qiporlomy~ Citellus Tami as-East THEE 1\ANGAHOO GHOUND Eutamias-WI'st Marmot~ SQUIHHELS HATS SQUIRRELS \.llll''ll :NKS W(XlllCitLCKS U.S . DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE, PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE, Communicable Di_sease Center, Training Branch, Atlanta, Georgia- 1962 EM 2650 - Page 5 years. These peaks and the ability to multiply so protection for mice. As a result they are least rapidly have often been misinterpreted as a likely to be attacked by heavy mouse migration of heavy mouse populations into the populations. orchard. While such migrations do occur, they are usually of only limited distance from around Most susceptible are trees in permanent sod. The or within the orchard. dense cover and large overhang of branches provide good protection against enemies. SUSCEPTIBILITY OF TREES Control of weeds and sod around the base of the AND ORCHARDS tree eliminated much of this natural protection. Cultivating or otherwise disturbing the soil There is a significant difference in the around the base of the tree discourages nesting susceptibility of trees under differing close to the tree trunk. management practices and of varying ages, species, and rootstocks to serious injury and Managing the sod to provide ample food sources economic loss. These differences may be while at the same time balancing the mouse expressed in a generalized manner as follows: population to this food supply is one of the most effective means of reducing the hazard of Tree Age tree injury. Required is a well-fertilized and irrigated sod throughout the year. A cover which The volume of bark and trunk is important. In stops growing and becomes mature in late contrast to large, mature trees, a young tree has summer and fall can force mice to tum to trees only a limited amount of bark, and a few mice as a source of food. can readily girdle it. Mice prefer the relatively soft and succulent young or inner bark. Thus, MOUSE CONTROL MEASURES older trees with heavy, thick bark are less susceptible to serious injury or loss. There are a number of different practices which should be considered in developing an effective Species and Rootstock mouse-control program. Extensive use of various rodenticides can kill many mice, but they do not There are significant differences in the palata­ assure trees free from mouse damage. bility of bark to mice. The apple tree is preferred over all other species. Pear is much less suscep­ Monitoring Mouse Activity tible than apple, but preferred over stone fruits. Peach and, in some instances, cherry trees can be Foremost in control is the systemic survey of all be attacked while apricot, plum and prune are plantings and areas harboring mice followed by rarely bothered by mice. Dwarfing rootstocks routine monitoring of mouse activity. The field for apple are ,the most susceptible because of mouse develops a characteristic network of apparent differences in palatibility as well as runways. These serve as feeding areas and extend recovery following grafting across the girdle or from the nesting sites. Both are closely wounds. The more dwarfing rootstocks provide associated with dense ground cover. a smaller, more fibrous, root system than standard seedlings. Thus, they usually require In orchards, runways tend to be concentrated in-arching with new rootstocks rather than more heavily under the dripline of the trees. In bridging from large roots to the trunk. As a hedgerow plantings, they extend up and down result, tree loss is usually much higher. the row. Nests are often located near or close to the trunk of the tree. Rarely are the various Soil Management Practices colonies well-distributed in or near the orchard. They are more common or frequent where the Orchards which are clean-cultivated throughout soil is deep, fertile, well-covered with grass and the growing season provide little food source or weeds and well-drained. EM 2650 - Page 6 Once this network is located, it should be the principal means of controlling mice, there watched. Activity is evidenced by small piles of are other practices which may be used to reduce brownish droppings and short grass clippings the hazard of extensive mouse damage to trees. scattered along the path under the canopy of These are important because even the loss or cover. The freshness of these droppings and weakening of a few trees in a planting can be clippings is indicative of recent activity. How very costly in lost production. Further, while closely the vegetation along the sides of these the hazard is greatest from late summer until paths is clipped as well as the width of the path spring, feeding actually can occur almost any is a fair indication of use or population numbers.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Environmental Properties of Chemicals Volume 2
    1 t ENVIRONMENTAL 1 PROTECTION Esa Nikunen . Riitta Leinonen Birgit Kemiläinen • Arto Kultamaa Environmental properties of chemicals Volume 2 1 O O O O O O O O OO O OOOOOO Ol OIOOO FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE • EDITA Esa Nikunen e Riitta Leinonen Birgit Kemiläinen • Arto Kultamaa Environmental properties of chemicals Volume 2 HELSINKI 1000 OlO 00000001 00000000000000000 Th/s is a second revfsed version of Environmental Properties of Chemica/s, published by VAPK-Pub/ishing and Ministry of Environment, Environmental Protection Department as Research Report 91, 1990. The pubiication is also available as a CD ROM version: EnviChem 2.0, a PC database runniny under Windows operating systems. ISBN 951-7-2967-2 (publisher) ISBN 952-7 1-0670-0 (co-publisher) ISSN 1238-8602 Layout: Pikseri Julkaisupalvelut Cover illustration: Jussi Hirvi Edita Ltd. Helsinki 2000 Environmental properties of chemicals Volume 2 _____ _____________________________________________________ Contents . VOLUME ONE 1 Contents of the report 2 Environmental properties of chemicals 3 Abbreviations and explanations 7 3.1 Ways of exposure 7 3.2 Exposed species 7 3.3 Fffects________________________________ 7 3.4 Length of exposure 7 3.5 Odour thresholds 8 3.6 Toxicity endpoints 9 3.7 Other abbreviations 9 4 Listofexposedspecies 10 4.1 Mammais 10 4.2 Plants 13 4.3 Birds 14 4.4 Insects 17 4.5 Fishes 1$ 4.6 Mollusca 22 4.7 Crustaceans 23 4.8 Algae 24 4.9 Others 25 5 References 27 Index 1 List of chemicals in alphabetical order - 169 Index II List of chemicals in CAS-number order
    [Show full text]
  • Efficacy of 3 In-Burrow Treatments to Control Black-Tailed Prairie Dogs
    EFFICACY OF 3 JN-BURROW TREATMENTS TO CONTROL BLACK-TAJLED PRAIRIE DOGS CHARLES D. LEE, Department of Animal Science, Kansas State University Research and Extension, Manhattan, KS, USA JEFF LEFLORE , East Cheyenne County Pest Control, Cheyenne Wells , CO, USA Abstract: Management of prairie dog ( Cynomys ludovicianus) movement by colony expansion or dispersal may involve the use of toxicants to reduce local populations. Hazards associated with the use of toxicants cause concern for non-target species. Applying the bait in-burrow should reduce the primary exposure of the toxicants to non-target wildlife. Some literature suggests prairie dogs will not consume bait when applied in the burrow. In this trial we compared efficacy of Rozol ® (chlorophacinone), Kaput-D Prairie Dog Bait ® (diphacinone), 2% zinc phosphide oats applied in-burrow and 2% zinc phosphide oats applied on the surface. Results are reported as change in prairie dog activity. Key words: chlorophacinone , control, Cynomys ludovicianus, diphacinone, in-burrow, management , prairie dog, toxicant , zinc phosphide Proceedings of the I 2'h Wildlife Damage Management Conference (D.L. Nolte , W.M. Arjo, D.H. Stalman, Eds). 2007 INTRODUCTION This type of controversy has lead to scrutiny Control of black-tailed prame dogs of all types of control , especially the use of (Cynomys ludovicianus) is controversial on toxicants . Although there are numerous the Great Plains. Prairie dogs have been control techniques for prairie dogs, many controlled on rangeland for many years landowner s are dissatisfied with their largely with the use of toxicants applied consistency of efficacy and ease of use . above ground (Witmer and Fagerstone Most of the literature on black-tailed 2003).
    [Show full text]
  • Sound Management of Pesticides and Diagnosis and Treatment Of
    * Revision of the“IPCS - Multilevel Course on the Safe Use of Pesticides and on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Presticide Poisoning, 1994” © World Health Organization 2006 All rights reserved. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters. All reasonable precautions have been taken by the World Health Organization to verify the information contained in this publication. However, the published material is being distributed without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied. The responsibility for the interpretation and use of the material lies with the reader. In no event shall the World Health Organization be liable for damages arising from its use. CONTENTS Preface Acknowledgement Part I. Overview 1. Introduction 1.1 Background 1.2 Objectives 2. Overview of the resource tool 2.1 Moduledescription 2.2 Training levels 2.3 Visual aids 2.4 Informationsources 3. Using the resource tool 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Training trainers 3.2.1 Organizational aspects 3.2.2 Coordinator’s preparation 3.2.3 Selection of participants 3.2.4 Before training trainers 3.2.5 Specimen module 3.3 Trainers 3.3.1 Trainer preparation 3.3.2 Selection of participants 3.3.3 Organizational aspects 3.3.4 Before a course 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Implications of Using Zinc Phosphide to Replace Endrin in Apple Orchards
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center Eastern Pine and Meadow Vole Symposia for March 1977 Economic Implications of Using Zinc Phosphide To Replace Endrin in Apple Orchards Walter L. Ferguson Economic Research Service Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/voles Part of the Environmental Health and Protection Commons Ferguson, Walter L., "Economic Implications of Using Zinc Phosphide To Replace Endrin in Apple Orchards" (1977). Eastern Pine and Meadow Vole Symposia. 116. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/voles/116 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Eastern Pine and Meadow Vole Symposia by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. 33 Economic Implications of Using Zinc Phosphide To Replace Endrin in Apple Orchards 11 Walter L. Ferguson II Consideration is being given to suspend or restrict the use of endrin for controlling mice in orchards. If endrin were not available for this use, State extension and experiment station personnel in 6 Eastern States and 2 Western States estimated that apple production losses would increase from mice injury on 33,400 endrin-treated bearing acres, (12,500 acres in the Eastern States and 20,900 acres in the Western States). The 6 Eastern States include Georgia, Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia and West Virginia: the 2 Western States are Idaho and Washington. Estimates of production changes without endrin were made assuming zinc phosphide is the only feasible Federally registered chemical alternative to endrin.
    [Show full text]
  • RRAC Guidelines on Anticoagulant Rodenticide Resistance Management Editor: Rodenticide Resistance Action Committee (RRAC) of Croplife International Aim
    RRAC guidelines on Anticoagulant Rodenticide Resistance Management Editor: Rodenticide Resistance Action Committee (RRAC) of CropLife International Aim This document provides guidance to advisors, national authorities, professionals, practitioners and others on the nature of anticoagulant resistance in rodents, the identification of anticoagulant resistance, strategies for rodenticide application that will avoid the development of resistance and the management of resistance where it occurs. The Rodenticide Resistance Action Committee (RRAC) is a working group within the framework of CropLife International. Participating companies include: Bayer CropScience, BASF, LiphaTech S. A., PelGar, Rentokil Initial, Syngenta and Zapi. Senior technical specialists, with specific expertise in rodenticides, represent their companies on this committee. The RRAC is grateful to the following co-authors: Stefan Endepols, Alan Buckle, Charlie Eason, Hans-Joachim Pelz, Adrian Meyer, Philippe Berny, Kristof Baert and Colin Prescott. Photos provided by Stefan Endepols. Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 2 2. Classification and history of rodenticide compounds ..............................................................................................3 3. Mode of action of anticoagulant rodenticides, resistance mechanisms, and resistance mutations ......................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Rodenticidal Effects of Zinc Phosphide and Strychnine of Nontarget Species
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Great Plains Wildlife Damage Control Workshop Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center Proceedings for April 1987 Rodenticidal Effects of Zinc Phosphide and Strychnine of Nontarget Species Daniel W. Uresk Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Rapid City, South Dakota Rudy M. King Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Rapid City, South Dakota Anthony D. Apa South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Michele S. Deisch South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Raymond L. Linder South Dakota Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, South Dakota State University - Brookings Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/gpwdcwp Part of the Environmental Health and Protection Commons Uresk, Daniel W.; King, Rudy M.; Apa, Anthony D.; Deisch, Michele S.; and Linder, Raymond L., "Rodenticidal Effects of Zinc Phosphide and Strychnine of Nontarget Species" (1987). Great Plains Wildlife Damage Control Workshop Proceedings. 102. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/gpwdcwp/102 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Plains Wildlife Damage Control Workshop Proceedings by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Rodenticidal Effects of Zinc Phosphide and Strychnine on Nontarget Species1 Daniel W. Uresk, Rudy M. King, Anthony D. Apa, Michele S. Deisch, and Raymond L. Linder Abstract.—When three rodenticide treatments—zinc phosphide (prebaited) and strychnine (both with and without prebait)—were evaluated, zinc phosphide was the most effec- tive in reducing active burrows of prairie dogs; but, it also resulted in a reduction in deer mouse densities.
    [Show full text]
  • (Mrls) for Phosphane and Phosphide Salts According to Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005
    REASONED OPINION APPROVED: 25 November 2015 PUBLISHED: 04 December 2015 doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4325 Review of the existing maximum residue levels (MRLs) for phosphane and phosphide salts according to Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) Abstract According to Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has reviewed the maximum residue levels (MRLs) currently established at European level for phosphane; this residue may result from the use of phosphane itself or from the use of certain phosphide salts. In order to assess the occurrence of phosphane residues in plants, processed commodities, rotational crops and livestock, EFSA considered the conclusions derived in the framework of Directive 91/414/EEC, the MRLs established by the Codex Alimentarius Commission as well as the European authorisations reported by Member States (incl. the supporting residues data). Based on the assessment of the available data, MRL proposals were derived and a consumer risk assessment was carried out. Although no apparent risk to consumers was identified, some information required by the regulatory framework was missing. Hence, the consumer risk assessment is considered indicative only and some MRL proposals derived by EFSA still require further consideration by risk managers. © European Food Safety Authority, 2015 Keywords: phosphane, phosphide, MRL review, Regulation (EC) No 396/2005, consumer risk assessment, fumigant Requestor: European Commission Question number: EFSA-Q-2009-00095; EFSA-Q-2009-00151; EFSA-Q-2009-00157; EFSA-Q-2009-00173; EFSA-Q-2012-00944 Correspondence: [email protected] www.efsa.europa.eu/efsajournal EFSA Journal 2015;13(12):4325 Review of the existing MRLs for phosphane and phosphide salts Acknowledgement: EFSA wishes to thank the rapporteur Member State Germany for the preparatory work on this scientific output.
    [Show full text]
  • Acute Oral Toxicity and Repellency of 933 Chemicals to House and Deer Mice
    U.S. Department of Agriculture U.S. Government Publication Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Wildlife Services Archiv-of Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 14, 111-129 (1985) Environmental ontamination C ... ■ nd I oxicolagy © 1985 Springer-Verlag New York Inc. Acute Oral Toxicity and Repellency of 933 Chemicals to House and Deer Mice E. W. Schafer, Jr. and W. A. Bowles, Jr. U.S. Department of Interior - Fish and Wildlife Service, Denver Wildlife Research Center, Building 16 - Denver Federal Center, Denver, Colorado 80225 Abstract. Five individual bioassay repellency or deer mice and white (house) mice. Our purpose is toxicity variables were estimated or determined for to make available these generally unpublished test deer .mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) and house results so that they can be referenced or used by mice (Mus musculus) under laboratory conditions. the various public, private, and governmental ALD's (Approximate Lethal Doses) or LD50's of groups that may require this information. 230 chemicals to deer mice are presented, as are food reduction (FR) values (3-day feeding test as a 2.0% treatment rate) for white wheat seeds (Tri­ Methods ticum aestivum) for 696 chemicals and Douglas fir seeds (Pseudotsuga menziesii) for 81 chemicals. A The chemicals included in the tests were technical or analytical similar repellency evaluation (REP) using a 5-day grade pesticides and other commercially available or experi­ mental chemicals. They were purchased from various commer­ test with white wheat seeds at a 2.0% treatment rate cial sources or contributed by cooperating chemical companies. was conducted with house mice and the results for For presentation purposes, they have been arranged by Chemical 347 chemicals are presented.
    [Show full text]
  • Rational Design of Zinc Phosphide Heterojunction Photovoltaics
    Rational Design of Zinc Phosphide Heterojunction Photovoltaics Thesis by Jeffrey Paul Bosco In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California 2014 (Defended May 30, 2014) ii © 2014 Jeffrey Paul Bosco All Rights Reserved i ii \Look here, I have succeeded at last in fetching some gold from the sun." { Gustav Kirchhoff (After his banker questioned the value of investigating gold in the Fraunhofer lines of the sun and Kirchhoff handing him over a medal he was awarded for his investigations.) iii iv Acknowledgements First and foremost I would like to thank my research advisor, Prof. Harry Atwater, for the tremendous amount of support he has provided during my tenure at Caltech. I first met Harry during a chemical engineering recruiting trip. He handed me a copy of Scientific American, blasted me with energy and excitement over the future of plasmonics (of course I had never even heard of a surface plasmon at that point), and rushed off! Little did I know that I would be working in the Atwater labs only six months later and Harry would meet me with the same energy and enthusiasm regarding the topic of zinc phosphide photovoltaics. Five years later and he is still an incredible source of support, advice, and interesting scientific ideas. Thank you Harry. I am also indebted to the members of my thesis committee, Prof. Nathan Lewis, Prof. Kostantinos Giapis, and Prof. Richard Flagan. In particular, Nate has been an excellent scientific resource over the past couple of years. I clearly remember handing Nate a draft of my first (and in my eyes perfectly rigorous) scientific manuscript, only to have it returned a week later, so thor- oughly plastered with corrections written in red ink that it looked like someone had literally ripped an artery right out of the paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Manual on Rat Control
    NAVMED 518 Manual on RAT CONTROL American Mainland and Pacific Region Bureau of Medicine and Surgery. Navy Department Washington, D. C. 19 4 4 INTRODUCTION The common house rats and the semi-wild forms are important reservoirs of diseases that affect man. Damage to all types of materiel is a secondary but important reason for controlling rats in proximity to military bases, camps, and installations and aboard ships. Effective control requires some knowledge of species and habits of the rat population. DESCRIPTION AND CLASSIFICATION OF IMPORTANT RODENTS Three species of common house rats occur generally on the American main- land. In addition to these forms, several other species occur in the Pacific area. The semi-wild forms which live in the jungle or forest and waste-land have little contact with man and are relatively unimportant in rodent control; military oc- cupation and operations may change this picture to some extent. The semi-do- mestic forms which will require consideration and control are briefly described. The KEY is supplied for the purpose of separating and classifying rats on the mainland and those in the Pacific area. The most important rats from the medi- cal and economic viewpoint are: - Rattus norvegicus - Norway (Brown) Rat. The Norway rat is fairly large, usually russet or grayish-brown on the back and sides, the underparts having a slight gray to yellowish-white color. This'rat is present wherever human habita- tion creates suitable harboring places and an adequate food supply. It is persis- tent and aggressive and lives in association with other rats. Due to its greater adaptability and on account of its habit of living on and in the ground; it is gener- ally the most noticeable and numerous species.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2014/0271932 A1 Rubel Et Al
    US 2014027 1932A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2014/0271932 A1 Rubel et al. (43) Pub. Date: Sep. 18, 2014 (54) RODENTICIDAL COMPOSITION AND Publication Classification METHOD (51) Int. Cl. (71) Applicant: PIC Corporation/Pest Free Living, AOIN 59/00 (2006.01) Linden, NJ (US) (52) U.S. Cl. CPC ...................................... A0IN 59/00 (2013.01) (72) Inventors: Phyllis Rubel, Scotch Plains, NJ (US); USPC .......................................................... 424/717 Sidney Goldman, Verona, NJ (US); Bogdan Enache, Jersey City, NJ (US) (57) ABSTRACT A rodenticidal composition comprising a carbon dioxide (21) Appl. No.: 13/829,332 release agent and a carrier may be disclosed. A method of controlling rodents at a locus by applying the composition of (22) Filed: Mar 14, 2013 the disclosure may be disclosed. Patent Application Publication Sep. 18, 2014 US 2014/0271932 A1 9ISI I? 80I (S.97) US 2014/027 1932 A1 Sep. 18, 2014 RODENTCIDAL COMPOSITION AND 0007. In another embodiment of the present disclosure the METHOD carbonate salt and/or the bicarbonate salt may further com 0001. The present disclosure relates to a rodenticide or prise an ammonium cation. The nitrogen of the ammonium composition and method for controlling rodents, e.g. com cation may be substituted with from 1 to 4 substituents each of mensal rodents. which may be alkyl, phenyl, aryl, heteroaryl, or alkoxy-Sub 0002 The present disclosure may include a composition stituted alkyl. By the term alkyl may be generally meant lower comprising a rodenticidally effective amount of a carbon alkyl, that may be from C to C alkyl, or from C to Calkyl.
    [Show full text]
  • Eighth Great Plains Wildlife Damage Control Workshop Proceedings
    This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. Rodenticidal Effects of Zinc Phosphide and Strychnine on Nontarget Species1 Daniel W. Uresk, Rudy M. King, Anthony D. 2 Apa, Mlchele S. Deisch, and Raymond L. Linder Abstract.--When three rodenticide treatments--zinc phosphide (prebaited) and strychnine (both with and without prebait)--were evaluated, zinc phosphide was the most effec­ tive in reducing active burrows of prairie dogs; but, it also resulted in a reduction in deer mouse densities. One month after treatment, counts of fecal pellets of eastern cotton­ tails were greater on areas treated with strychnine without prebait than on sites treated with zinc phosphide. Eight months after treatment, no differences could be detected among rodenticides for either leporid. Horned lark densities were reduced 61% on sites treated with strychnine only. INTRODUCTION nontarget animals when zinc phosphide-treated grain bait was broadcast to control Richardson's ground Rodenticides have been used for prairie dog squirrels {Spermophilus richardsonii). control on the Great Plains since the late 1800's (Merriam 1902). Most recent prairie dog control Strychnine, used for prairie dog control since programs on federal, state, and private lands the late 1800's (Merriam 1902), has been reported consist of poisoning prairie dogs with zinc to present secondary hazards to nontarget animals phosphide on rolled oats after prebaiting with (Schitoskey 1975, Hegdal et al. 1981). Wood (1965) rolled oats (Schenbeck 1962). However, for more reported that densities of five rodent species than 70 years, little effort has been made to fluctuated independently over a 2-year period after evaluate rodenticide impacts on nontarget animals.
    [Show full text]