Angler Survey on the Sheep and Highwood Rivers, 2017 Angler Survey on the Sheep and Highwood Rivers, 2017

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Angler Survey on the Sheep and Highwood Rivers, 2017 Angler Survey on the Sheep and Highwood Rivers, 2017 Angler Survey on the Sheep and Highwood Rivers, 2017 Angler Survey on the Sheep and Highwood Rivers, 2017 Kevin Fitzsimmons Alberta Conservation Association PO Box 144 Cochrane, Alberta T4C 1A4 Report Editors PETER AKU NYREE SHARP Alberta Conservation Association c/o Alberta Conservation Association 101 – 9 Chippewa Rd. 101 – 9 Chippewa Rd. Sherwood Park, AB T8A 6J7 Sherwood Park, AB T8A 6J7 Conservation Report Series Type Data ISBN: 978-0-9959984-3-8 Reproduction and Availability: This report and its contents may be reproduced in whole, or in part, provided that this title page is included with such reproduction and/or appropriate acknowledgements are provided to the authors and sponsors of this project. Suggested Citation: Fitzsimmons, K. 2018. Angler Survey on the Sheep and Highwood Rivers, 2017. Data Report, produced by Alberta Conservation Association, Sherwood Park, Alberta, Canada. 21 pp. + App. Cover photo credit: David Fairless Digital copies of conservation reports can be obtained from: Alberta Conservation Association 101 – 9 Chippewa Rd. Sherwood Park, AB T8A 6J7 Toll Free: 1-877-969-9091 Tel: (780) 410-1998 Fax: (780) 464-0990 Email: [email protected] Website: www.ab-conservation.com i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Anecdotal evidence suggests that the Sheep and Highwood rivers are popular trout angling destinations in the Bow River drainage of Alberta, yet very little quantitative data exists on these fisheries. From June 16 through October 31, 2017, we conducted angler surveys on these rivers to generate current information that will aid Alberta Environment and Parks in managing these popular recreational fisheries. We estimated fishing effort from aerial angler counts, while fish catch, trip length and other pertinent demographic information were collected from angler interviews during roving surveys. We used bootstrapping techniques to derive estimates and confidence intervals for creel metrics. On the Sheep River, we counted and interviewed 282 and 93 anglers, respectively. We estimated that anglers fished for 19,829 hours (15,952–23,920), made 6,284 trips (4,467–8,760), and the average trip length was 2.9 hours. Fly fishing was more commonly practiced than spin casting, and angler use of access sites varied among the identified sites with urban areas and developed recreational facilities having greater use. Total release of all fish was 14,236 (95% CI = 11,117–17,645) on the Sheep River, with rainbow trout the most abundantly released fish at 10,473 (95% CI = 8,066–13,164). The only harvest of fish reported by anglers was one mountain whitefish from the Sandy McNabb site on June 26, 2017. On the Highwood River, we counted and interviewed 494 and 228 anglers, respectively. We estimated that anglers fished for 39,581 hours (31,328–49,227), made 9,474 trips (7,221–12,240), and the average trip length was 4.4 hours. Fly fishing was more commonly practiced than spin casting, and angler use of identified access sites did not show any clear patterns of preference. Total release of all fish was 20,886 (95% CI = 16,901–25,234) on the Highwood River, with rainbow trout the most abundantly released fish at 10,269 (95% CI = 8,357–12,382). No harvest of fish was reported by anglers. Key words: angler survey, angler effort, angler interviews, Highwood River, Sheep River, instantaneous angler counts, sport fishery. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We thank Alberta Conservation Association staff Lindsay Dowbush and Russell Kondro for assistance with data collection. Alberta Agriculture and Forestry (Calgary Wildfire Management Area) provided landing space at the Highwood fire base and flight tracking for aerial angler counts. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................... ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................................................................................iii 1.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 5 2.0 STUDY AREA ................................................................................................................................. 5 3.0 MATERIALS AND METHODS ................................................................................................... 7 3.1 Survey design ............................................................................................................................. 7 3.2 Angler interviews ....................................................................................................................... 7 3.3 Instantaneous angler counts ..................................................................................................... 8 3.4 Estimation of creel parameters ................................................................................................. 9 4.0 RESULTS ....................................................................................................................................... 10 4.1 Sheep River ............................................................................................................................... 10 4.2 Highwood River ...................................................................................................................... 15 5.0 SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................... 20 6.0 LITERATURE CITED .................................................................................................................. 21 7.0 APPENDICES ............................................................................................................................... 22 1 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. The Sheep and Highwood river study reaches, angler access points and instantaneous angler count locations, for the 2017 angler survey. ................................. 6 Figure 2. Access-point use by anglers on the Sheep River during the 2017 angler survey. ....... 11 Figure 3. Access-point use by anglers on the Highwood River during the 2017 angler survey. .. ................................................................................................................................................ 15 2 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Number of survey shifts completed during the angler survey on the Sheep River and on Reach 1 and 2 of the Highwood River, 2017. ............................................................... 8 Table 2. Number of instantaneous angler aerial angler surveys completed on the Sheep and Highwood rivers, 2017. ......................................................................................................... 9 Table 3. Summary of angler interviews completed on the Sheep and Highwood rivers, 2017. ....................................................................................................................................... 11 Table 4. Estimated angler effort (hours) and number of trips by season and reach on the Sheep River, 2017. ................................................................................................................ 13 Table 5. Total catch rates (number of fish/hour) for Reaches 1 and 2 of the Sheep River study area, 2017. ............................................................................................................................. 13 Table 6. Estimated angler released fish in Reaches 1 and 2 of the Sheep River study area, 2017. ....................................................................................................................................... 14 Table 7. Estimated angler effort (hours) and number of trips by season and reach on the Highwood River, 2017. ....................................................................................................... 17 Table 8. Total catch rates (number of fish/hour) for Reaches 1 and 2 of the Highwood River study area, 2017. .................................................................................................................. 18 Table 9. Estimated angler released fish in Reaches 1 and 2 of the Highwood River study area, 2017. ....................................................................................................................................... 19 3 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix 1. Data from angler interviews on the Sheep River, 2017.Error! Bookmark not defined. Appendix 2. Instantaneous angler counts from the Sheep River, 2017.Error! Bookmark not defined. Appendix 3. Data from angler interviews on the Highwood River, 2017.Error! Bookmark not defined. Appendix 4. Instantaneous angler counts from the Highwood River, 2017.Error! Bookmark not defined. 4 1.0 INTRODUCTION Attracting both resident and non-resident anglers, the Sheep and Highwood rivers are considered destination trout fishing streams in the Bow River drainage of Alberta. One of the tools used to effectively manage these sport fisheries is an angler survey, from which metrics such as angling effort and trip length (hours), angler trip numbers, and fish harvest and release can be derived. While angler surveys have been completed on nearby rivers (Thompson 1977, Sosiak 1987, R.L. & L. Environmental Services 1995, Ripley and Council 2006, Fitzsimmons 2017), formal angler surveys have never been completed on the Sheep and Highwood rivers, two major tributaries in the Bow River drainage that are suspected to receive high angling pressure. The main objective of
Recommended publications
  • Field Trip Guide Soils and Landscapes of the Front Ranges
    1 Field Trip Guide Soils and Landscapes of the Front Ranges, Foothills, and Great Plains Canadian Society of Soil Science Annual Meeting, Banff, Alberta May 2014 Field trip leaders: Dan Pennock (U. of Saskatchewan) and Paul Sanborn (U. Northern British Columbia) Field Guide Compiled by: Dan and Lea Pennock This Guidebook could be referenced as: Pennock D. and L. Pennock. 2014. Soils and Landscapes of the Front Ranges, Foothills, and Great Plains. Field Trip Guide. Canadian Society of Soil Science Annual Meeting, Banff, Alberta May 2014. 18 p. 2 3 Banff Park In the fall of 1883, three Canadian Pacific Railway construction workers stumbled across a cave containing hot springs on the eastern slopes of Alberta's Rocky Mountains. From that humble beginning was born Banff National Park, Canada's first national park and the world's third. Spanning 6,641 square kilometres (2,564 square miles) of valleys, mountains, glaciers, forests, meadows and rivers, Banff National Park is one of the world's premier destination spots. In Banff’s early years, The Canadian Pacific Railway built the Banff Springs Hotel and Chateau Lake Louise, and attracted tourists through extensive advertising. In the early 20th century, roads were built in Banff, at times by war internees, and through Great Depression-era public works projects. Since the 1960s, park accommodations have been open all year, with annual tourism visits to Banff increasing to over 5 million in the 1990s. Millions more pass through the park on the Trans-Canada Highway. As Banff is one of the world's most visited national parks, the health of its ecosystem has been threatened.
    [Show full text]
  • New York State Petroleum Business Tax Druwbcamcw^]B M]Q >WPR]Brb
    Publication 532 New York State Petroleum Business Tax DRUWbcaMcW^]bM]Q>WPR]bRb NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION AND FINANCE PETROLEUM BUSINESS TAX - PUBLICATION 532 PAGE NO. 1 ISSUE DATE 08/09/2021 REGISTRATIONS CANCELLED AND SURRENDERED 02/2021 THRU 08/2021 ALL ASSERTIONS OF RE-INSTATEMENTS OF ANY REGISTRATIONS WHICH HAVE BEEN LISTED AS CANCELLED OR SURRENDERED MUST BE VERIFIED WITH THE TAX DEPARTMENT. ACCORDINGLY, IF ANY DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED TO YOU INDICATING THAT A REGISTRATION HAS BEEN RE-INSTATED, YOU SHOULD CONTACT THE DEPARTMENT'S REGISTRATION AND BOND UNIT AT (518) 591-3089 TO VERIFY THE AUTHENTICITY OF SUCH DOCUMENT. CANCEL COMMERCIAL AVIATION FUEL BUSINESS = A KERO-JET DISTRIBUTOR ONLY = K RETAILER NON-HIGHWAY DIESEL ONLY = R GRID: DIESEL FUEL DISTRIBUTOR = D RESIDUAL PRODUCTS BUSINESS = L TERMINAL OPERATOR = T DIRECT PAY PERMIT - DYED DIESEL = F MOTOR FUEL DISTRIBUTOR = M UTILITIES = U AVIATION GAS RETAIL = G NATURAL GAS = N MCTD MOTOR FUEL WHOLESALERS = W IMPORTING TRANSPORTER = I LIQUID PROPANE = P CANCELLED CANCELLED SURRENDER SURRENDER LEGAL NAME D/B/A NAME CITY ST EIN/TAX ID DATE GRID 37TH AVENUE TRUCKING INC. CORONA NY 113625758 07/15/2021 R ALCUS FUEL OIL, INC. MORICHES NY 113083439 07/15/2021 R ALPINE FUEL INC. EAST ISLIP NY 113180819 07/15/2021 R AMIGOS OIL COMPANY, INC. GREENLAWN NY 274467335 07/15/2021 R ATTIS ETHANOL FULTON, LLC ALPHARETTA GA 832710677 07/26/2021 M T BLY ENERGY SERVICE LLC PETERSBURG NY 811464155 02/21/2021 R BUTTON OIL COMPANY INC MOUNTAIN TOP PA 231654350 02/26/2021 D CRANER OIL COMPANY, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • The Little Bow Gets Bigger – Alberta's Newest River
    ALBERTA WILDERNESS Article ASSOCIATION Wild Lands Advocate 13(1): 14 - 17, February 2005 The Little Bow Gets Bigger – Alberta’s Newest River Dam By Dr. Stewart B. Rood, Glenda M. Samuelson and Sarah G. Bigelow The Little Bow/Highwood Rivers Project includes Alberta’s newest dam and provides the second major water project to follow the Oldman River Dam. The controversy surrounding the Oldman Dam attracted national attention that peaked in about 1990, and legal consideration up to the level of the Supreme Court over federal versus provincial jurisdiction and the nature and need for environmental impact analysis. A key outcome was that while environmental matters are substantially under provincial jurisdiction, rivers involve fisheries, navigation, and First Nations issues that invoke federal responsibility. As a consequence, any major water management project in Canada requires both provincial and federal review. At the time of the Oldman Dam Project, three other proposed river projects in Alberta had received considerable support and even partial approval. Of these, the Pine Coulee Project was the first to advance, probably partly because it was expected to be the least controversial and complex. That project involved the construction of a small dam on Willow Creek, about an hour south of Calgary. A canal from that dam diverts water to be stored in a larger, offstream reservoir in Pine Coulee. That water would then be available for release back into Willow Creek during the late summer when flows are naturally low but irrigation demands are high. Pine Coulee was generally a dry prairie coulee and reservoir flooding did not inundate riparian woodlands or an extensive stream channel.
    [Show full text]
  • Map of Elbow River Valley
    Map of Elbow River Valley ( Bragg Creek T r P a West v o e T l Bragg w Provincial Park n o o d m Creek t to Trans-Canada r e 22 e SIBBALD AREA c S r o n (#1) Highway f o m a w m c e e T n d rail e Trail BRAGG d Canyon Elbow Valley i n Creek w ELBOW Visitor Centre CREEK e t (road) w e a RIVER 758 t Fullerton Loop h e r Sulphur Springs ) VALLEY Trail Ing's Trail 22 Gooseberry 66 Mine Diamond T 40 Loop Ford Creek Trail Allen Bill Station Don Getty Flats River Cove Prairie Creek Trail McLean Pond Powderface Elbow Groups Wildland Provincial Falls Year Winter Round Gate M Gate Winter c Park Trail Gate Groups L McLean Creek Prairie Link e a Prairie Creek Paddy's Flat n Trail C Creek r Elbow-Sheep Winter Gate e Riverview Trail e Beaver k Elbow R Flat o Wildland River a Powderface BeaverLaunch d Provincial Park Ridge Trail 66 Lodge Ford Creek Trail d a o Cobble McLEAN CREEK R Flats s l Nihahi Creek Trail l a F OFF-HIGHWAY VEHICLE ZONE Nihahi Ridge ow lb N TTrail E Wildhorse Trail Winter Forgetmenot Gate Pond Fisher Creek Little Hog's Back Curley Elbow Trail Sands Threepoint Trail Creek Trail Wildhorse to Mount Groups Millarville, Turner Valley, Romulus North ForkMesa Butte Black Diamond, Calgary Winter Trail Gate Threepoint Mtn. Trail 549 Don Getty North Fork Gorge Creek Trail Big 9999 Trail Wildland Provincial Elbow Volcano Ridge Trail Volcano Ware Park Ridge Creek Bluerock Ware Little Elbow Trail Creek Trail Big Elbow Trail Wildland Death Valley Peter Link Creek Trail Trail Lougheed Provincial Provincial Park Park Tombstone Sheep River Provincial Park Copyright © 2008 Government of Alberta.
    [Show full text]
  • Sheep River Hazard Study Update Notice
    Sheep River Hazard Study Study update notice We would like to provide an update on the status of the Sheep River Hazard Study. The multi-year study started in fall 2015 and we recognize there is tremendous interest in new flood mapping products. Municipal review and public engagement for draft flood inundation maps and related technical reports is complete. In response to feedback we received, revisions to hydraulic modelling and flood mapping are underway to better represent Highway 22 bridge hydraulics in the Black Diamond area. Internal review of draft flood hazard maps continues, and a new approach to mapping floodways and updating flood hazard maps is being implemented. The new approach will better balance flood adaptation and resilience priorities and provide expanded flood hazard information to enhance public safety and inform local decision-making. We are exploring future municipal review and public engagement opportunities for draft flood hazard mapping, and will provide an update when more information becomes available. The Sheep River Hazard Study is being completed under the provincial Flood Hazard Identification Program, the goals of which include enhancement of public safety and reduction of future flood damages through the identification of river and flood hazards. More information about the Alberta Flood Hazard Identification Program can be found at: www.floodhazard.alberta.ca If you have any questions regarding this work, the project engagement and education specialist, Alyssa Robb, can be contacted at: Email: [email protected] Telephone: 403 512-4450 Flood Hazard Identification Program: https://www.alberta.ca/flood-hazard-identification-program.aspx ©2021 Government of Alberta | September 17, 2021 | Environment and Parks Classification: Public Project background and study progress The Sheep River Hazard Study assesses and identifies river-related hazards along 60 km of the Sheep River upstream of the Highwood River confluence, and 35 km of Threepoint Creek upstream of the Sheep River confluence.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrometric Data Review for 3 Sites Upstream of Okotoks, Alberta
    Prepared for AMEC Foster Wheeler Hydrometric Data Review for 3 Sites Upstream of Okotoks, Alberta 05BL012 – Sheep River at Okotoks 05BL013 – Three Point Creek at Millarville 05BL014 – Sheep River at Black Diamond Greg MacCulloch P.Eng. 6/29/2015 Acknowledgements All data source for this review was provided by Environment Canada either through their publicly available HYDAT website (https://ec.gc.ca/rhc-wsc/default.asp?lang=En&n=894E91BE-1), the EC Data Explorer desktop application, or from personal correspondence with staff at the Water Survey of Canada, Alberta District Office in Calgary, Alberta. The author would, in particular, like to express his gratitude to Mr. Dennis Lazowski, Hydrological Services Supervisor, WSC-Alberta for his invaluable help and generous efforts in providing the data and associated information with speed and accuracy. i Hydrometric Data Review for 3 Sites Upstream of Okotoks, Alberta 1 Introduction Subsequent to significant flooding that occurred in Southern Alberta during the month of June, 2013, a detailed look at the basic data used to compute peak flow risk is warranted. This report reviews the data provided by the National Hydrometric Program, a cost-shared program by the governments of Canada and the Provinces. It should be noted that throughout this review the terms “flowrate” and “discharge” are considered synonyms and are used interchangeably. Factors impacting the quality of the hydrometric record used in the risk assessment include: Proximity to the point of interest Length of record Range of observation Measurement frequency Rating stability Hydrograph Consistency: compare annual peak flows: Maximum Instantaneous, Maximum Daily, Event Volumes and other sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring Science and Technology Symposium: Unifying Knowledge
    Tri Community Watershed Initiative: Towns of Black Diamond, Turner Valley and Okotoks, Alberta, Canada Promoting Sustainable Behaviour in Watersheds and Communities Maureen Lynch is the Coordinator of the Tri Community Watershed Initiative, Black Diamond, AB, T0L 0H0 Abstract—For the past two years, three rural municipalities in the foothills of the Canadian Rockies have been working together to promote sustainability in their communities. The towns share the belief that water is an integral part of the community; they have formed a Tri Community Watershed Initiative to help manage their shared resource. Activities of the Initiative include changing municipal policies, writing municipal water, and river valley management plans, working with partners, hosting community events and engaging local media in community success stories. The towns are also assisting residents in outdoor water conservation efforts. To date, 100 percent of the households – more than 15,000 residents in approximately 6,000 households – have participated in community-wide water conservation campaigns that protect the local watershed. The Initiative has improved local policy and decision-making through a collaborative, multi-stakeholder approach that delivers ecological monitoring science in a manner that improves knowledge in the decision-making process. Involvement of town councilors in this ecological monitoring initiative has allowed local decision makers to gain awareness and knowledge that has led to action on community environmental watershed issues and increased community capacity. Decisions made at local and landscape scales have a direct impact on sustainability. This Initiative has succeeded in ensuring that choices are informed and reflect the col- lective values of the community. By identifying values and defining sustainability, the communities have been empowered to monitor progress and feed into adaptive deci- sion-making processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Alberta Tools Update with Notes.Pdf
    1 2 3 A serious game “is a game designed for a primary purpose other than pure entertainment. The "serious" adjective is generally prepended to refer to video games used by industries like defense, education, scientific exploration, health care, emergency management, city planning, engineering, and politics.” 4 5 The three inflow channels provide natural water supply into the model. The three inflow channels are the Bow River just downstream of the Bearspaw Dam and the inflows from the Elbow and Highwood River tributaries. The downstream end of the model is the junction with the Oldman River which then forms the South Saskatchewan River. The model includes the Glenmore Reservoir located on the Elbow River, upstream of the junction with the Bow River. 6 The Tutorial Mode consists of two interactive tutorials. The first tutorial introduces stakeholders to water management concepts and the second tutorial introduces the users to the Bow River Sim. The tutorials are guided by “Wheaton” an animated stalk of wheat who guides the users through the tutorials. 7 - Exploration Mode lets people play freely with sliders, etc, and see what the results are. - The Challenge Mode explores the concept of goal-oriented play which helps users further explore and learn about the WRMM model and water management. In Challenge Mode, the parameters that could be changed were limited, and the stakeholders are provided with specific learning objectives. Three challenges are introduced in this order: Reservoir Challenge, Calgary Challenge and Priority Challenge. 8 9 Flood Hazard Identification Program Objectives 10 Overview of our flood mapping web application – Multiple uses Supports internal and external groups Co-funded by Government of Alberta and Government of Canada through the National Disaster Mitigation program.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Storage Opportunities in the South Saskatchewan River Basin in Alberta
    Water Storage Opportunities in the South Saskatchewan River Basin in Alberta Submitted to: Submitted by: SSRB Water Storage Opportunities AMEC Environment & Infrastructure, Steering Committee a Division of AMEC Americas Limited Lethbridge, Alberta Lethbridge, Alberta 2014 amec.com WATER STORAGE OPPORTUNITIES IN THE SOUTH SASKATCHEWAN RIVER BASIN IN ALBERTA Submitted to: SSRB Water Storage Opportunities Steering Committee Lethbridge, Alberta Submitted by: AMEC Environment & Infrastructure Lethbridge, Alberta July 2014 CW2154 SSRB Water Storage Opportunities Steering Committee Water Storage Opportunities in the South Saskatchewan River Basin Lethbridge, Alberta July 2014 Executive Summary Water supply in the South Saskatchewan River Basin (SSRB) in Alberta is naturally subject to highly variable flows. Capture and controlled release of surface water runoff is critical in the management of the available water supply. In addition to supply constraints, expanding population, accelerating economic growth and climate change impacts add additional challenges to managing our limited water supply. The South Saskatchewan River Basin in Alberta Water Supply Study (AMEC, 2009) identified re-management of existing reservoirs and the development of additional water storage sites as potential solutions to reduce the risk of water shortages for junior license holders and the aquatic environment. Modelling done as part of that study indicated that surplus water may be available and storage development may reduce deficits. This study is a follow up on the major conclusions of the South Saskatchewan River Basin in Alberta Water Supply Study (AMEC, 2009). It addresses the provincial Water for Life goal of “reliable, quality water supplies for a sustainable economy” while respecting interprovincial and international apportionment agreements and other legislative requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Bow River Basin State of the Watershed Summary 2010 Bow River Basin Council Calgary Water Centre Mail Code #333 P.O
    30% SW-COC-002397 Bow River Basin State of the Watershed Summary 2010 Bow River Basin Council Calgary Water Centre Mail Code #333 P.O. Box 2100 Station M Calgary, AB Canada T2P 2M5 Street Address: 625 - 25th Ave S.E. Bow River Basin Council Mark Bennett, B.Sc., MPA Executive Director tel: 403.268.4596 fax: 403.254.6931 email: [email protected] Mike Murray, B.Sc. Program Manager tel: 403.268.4597 fax: 403.268.6931 email: [email protected] www.brbc.ab.ca Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 2 Overview 4 Basin History 6 What is a Watershed? 7 Flora and Fauna 10 State of the Watershed OUR SUB-BASINS 12 Upper Bow River 14 Kananaskis River 16 Ghost River 18 Seebe to Bearspaw 20 Jumpingpound Creek 22 Bearspaw to WID 24 Elbow River 26 Nose Creek 28 WID to Highwood 30 Fish Creek 32 Highwood to Carseland 34 Highwood River 36 Sheep River 38 Carseland to Bassano 40 Bassano to Oldman River CONCLUSION 42 Summary 44 Acknowledgements 1 Overview WELCOME! This State of the Watershed: Summary Booklet OVERVIEW OF THE BOW RIVER BASIN LET’S TAKE A CLOSER LOOK... THE WATER TOWERS was created by the Bow River Basin Council as a companion to The mountainous headwaters of the Bow our new Web-based State of the Watershed (WSOW) tool. This Comprising about 25,000 square kilometres, the Bow River basin The Bow River is approximately 645 kilometres in length. It begins at Bow Lake, at an River basin are often described as the booklet and the WSOW tool is intended to help water managers covers more than 4% of Alberta, and about 23% of the South elevation of 1,920 metres above sea level, then drops 1,180 metres before joining with the water towers of the watershed.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring the Elbow River
    Freshwater Monitoring: A Case Study An educational field study for Grade 8 and 9 students Fall 2010 Acknowledgements The development of this field study program was made possible through a partnership between Alberta Tourism, Parks and Recreation, the Friends of Kananaskis Country, and the Elbow River Watershed Partnership. The program was written and compiled by the Environmental Education Program in Kananaskis Country and the field study equipment and programming staff were made possible through the Friends of Kananaskis Country with financial support from the Elbow River Watershed Partnership, Alberta Ecotrust, the City of Calgary, and Lafarge Canada. The Elbow River Watershed Partnership also provided technical support and expertise. These materials are copyrighted and are the property of Alberta Tourism, Parks and Recreation. They have been developed for educational purposes. Reproduction of student worksheets by school and other non-profit organizations is encouraged with acknowledgement of source when they are used in conjunction with this field study program. Otherwise, written permission is required for the reproduction or use of anything contained in this document. For further information contact the Environmental Education Program in Kananaskis Country. Committee responsible for implementing the program includes: Monique Dietrich Elbow River Watershed Partnership, Calgary, Alberta Jennifer Janzen Springbank High School, Springbank, Alberta Mike Tyler Woodman Junior High School, Calgary, Alberta Janice Poleschuk St. Jean Brebeuf
    [Show full text]
  • South Saskatchewan River Basin Adaptation to Climate Variability Project
    South Saskatchewan River Basin Adaptation to Climate Variability Project Climate Variability and Change in the Bow River Basin Final Report June 2013 This study was commissioned for discussion purposes only and does not necessarily reflect the official position of the Climate Change Emissions Management Corporation, which is funding the South Saskatchewan River Basin Adaptation to Climate Variability Project. The report is published jointly by Alberta Innovates – Energy and Environment Solutions and WaterSMART Solutions Ltd. This report is available and may be freely downloaded from the Alberta WaterPortal website at www.albertawater.com. Disclaimer Information in this report is provided solely for the user’s information and, while thought to be accurate, is provided strictly “as is” and without warranty of any kind. The Crown, its agents, employees or contractors will not be liable to you for any damages, direct or indirect, or lost profits arising out of your use of information provided in this report. Alberta Innovates – Energy and Environment Solutions (AI-EES) and Her Majesty the Queen in right of Alberta make no warranty, express or implied, nor assume any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information contained in this publication, nor that use thereof infringe on privately owned rights. The views and opinions of the author expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of AI-EES or Her Majesty the Queen in right of Alberta. The directors, officers, employees, agents and consultants of AI-EES and the Government of Alberta are exempted, excluded and absolved from all liability for damage or injury, howsoever caused, to any person in connection with or arising out of the use by that person for any purpose of this publication or its contents.
    [Show full text]