1981 &Hyphen; an Extraordinary Year for Golden Eagle &Ldquo;Triplets&Rdquo; in the Central Rocky Mountains

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1981 &Hyphen; an Extraordinary Year for Golden Eagle &Ldquo;Triplets&Rdquo; in the Central Rocky Mountains FALL 1984 SHORT COMMUNICATIONS 111 SHORT COMMUNICATIONS 1981- An ExtraordinaryYear for GoldenEagle "Triplets" in the CentralRocky Mountains M. ALANJENKINS AND RONALD A. JOSEPH The clutchsize of the GoldenEagle (Aquila chrysaetos) and Collopy 1983). We are unableto assessthe influence rangesfrom 1 to 4 eggswith a meannear 2 (Brown 1977). of thesefactors on the high number of triplets in 1981 Clutchesof 3 are unusual,occurring less than 10% of the with the possibleexception of the influenceof high prey time (Table 1). Normally,1 to 3 youngfledge/successful densities.Clutch size, and therefore, ultimate productivity nestwith a mean of 1.2 to 1.4 (Brown 1977). (numberof fledgedyoung/successful nest), are partly in- Table 1. Frequencyof 3-eggclutches in the GoldenEagle. No. oF No. oF 3-EGG % OF 3-EGG STUDYAREA YEAR(S) CLUTCHES CLUTCHES CLUTCHES REFERENCE California 21 3 14.3 Slevin, in Arnell 1971 Scotland 82 8 9.8 Gordon 1955 Colorado 5 0 0.0 Jollie,in Arnell 1971 Montana 1963-1964 60 4 6.7 McGahan 1966 Montana 1963-1968 30 1 3.3 Reynolds 1969 Utah 1957-1958 5 0 0.0 Hinman [no date] Utah 1967-1968 23 1 0.4 Murphy et al. 1969 Utah 1969-1970 26 8 30.8 Arnell 1971 Idaho, Oregon 1966 15 1 6.7 Hickman [no date] TOTALS 267 26 MEAN 9.7 Variousfactors, from failureto lay eggsto mortalityof fluencedby the quantityof food adult femaleseat before nestlings,reduce the probabilityof a pair of eaglesfledg- egg-layingaffecting her nutritionalstate of health (New- ing 3 ("triplets")from a nest.Table 2 comparesdata on the ton 1979).Newton (1979) pointedout that rodent-eating frequencyof 3 fledgling nestsfrom various studiesof raptors lay clutchesthat can vary directly in size with GoldenEagles in the westernUnited States. rodent densitiesin the nest area. This allowsraptors to In 1981, we independentlysurveyed eagle nestsfor exploitrodent and othercyclic prey species in high density productivityand recordednests with 3 nestlings.We sub- yearsby increasingproductivity. Evidence suggest that sequentlydiscovered that other investigators,in Utah this is true of Golden Eagle-preyrelationships, because especially,found 5 nestlingnests. The mean percentage the eagle's diet in North America is mainly (74%) (3.8%) of nestsfledging triplets in 1981 in Utah, Col- lagomorphsand rodents(Olendorff 1976) that exhibit orado, and Wyoming is significantlyhigher P < 0.10) cyclicpopulations (Murphy 1975).This relationshipmay thanthe mean percentage of tripletsfor otheryears in the be moderatedby other factors. western United States(Table 2). We assumedthat mortal- In the western United StatesIagomorph populations ity of the nearly-grownnestling eagles observed in 1981 appear to haveincreased in the yearsleading up to 1981. was low and that most nearly-grownnestlings fledged. In southwesternIdaho populationsof Black-tailedJack- Moststudies with whichwe compared our dataalso made rabbits(Leus californicus) reached plague proportions in that assumptionby countingnearly-grown nestlings as the winter of 1981-82, as reported in the popular press fledglings. (e.g., Trueblood 1982). Jackrabbit densitieswere the Many factors can influence productivityin Golden highestin 9 y in 1981 in the SnakeRiver Canyonof Idaho Eaglesas reviewedby Newton(1979); alsosee Edwards (Steenhofet al. 1983). In Utah,jackrabbit censuses con- 112 SHORT CO•MX•tCATtO•S VOL. 18, NO. 3 Table 2. Frequencyof three-fledgling(triplet) GoldenEagle nests in the westernU.S. TOTAL No. SUCCESSFULNo. WITH % SUCCESSFUL STUDY AREA YEAR THROUGHOUT STUDY TRIPLETS w/TRIPLETS REFERENCE Years Other Than 1981 Idaho, Oregon 1966 17 0 Hinman• no date Utah 1957-1958 5 0 Hinman, no date Utah 1967-1968 18 0 Camenzind 1968 Utah 1969-1970 19 3 15.8 Arnell 1971 Wyoming,Colo. 1964-1980 882 l 0.1 Den. Wildl. Res. Ctr. data Wyoming 1979 11 0* Lockhart et al. 1980 •qyoming,Mont. 1975-1978 34 0* Lockhart et al. 1978 Montana 1963- 1964 55 3 McGahan 1966 Montana 1962-1968 22 0 Reynolds1969 Oklahoma 1974-1975 6 0 Lish 1965 Texas 1974-1975 5 0 Lockhart 1976 TOTALS !,074 7 MEAN 0.7 1981 Data Utah 1981 95 6 6.3 Present study Colorado 1981 94 3 3.2 Pearson, Grode pers. cornYD. Wyoming 1981 46 0 0 Phillipsand Beske! 98 ! TOTALS 235 9 MEAN 3.8 *Data gatheredby personalcommunication with the author. ductedby the Departmentof the Army (R. LeClercpers. An earlierdraft of themanuscript was reviewed and im- comm.)showed that densitieswere high(though decreas- provedby M.A. Bogan,W.R. Dryer, and R.L. Phillips. ing thereafter) in autumn 1980 at 3 northwestern Utah studysites, moderate populations at 3 others,and lowat 1 Nevada site.Data from both Steenhofet al. (1983) and the LITERATURE CITED Army showsimilar high densitiesin 1971supporting the hypothesisof a 10 yrjackrabbitpopulation cycle in these ARNELL,W.B. 1971. Prey utilizationby nestingGolden areas. Eagles(Acquila chrysaetos) in central Utah. MS Thesis. Increasedprey availability for nestingeagles is probably BrighamYoung University, Provo, Utah. an importantcause for higher than normal frequencyof BROWN,L. 1977. Eaglesof the world. UniverseBooks, tripletsin the westernUnited Statesin 1981. The only New York. 244 pp. otherinstance of a highfrequency of tripletsis the study CAMENZIND,F.J. 1968. Nestingecology and behaviorof of Arnell (1971) in Utah. He noted hieh lagomor_ph the GoldenEagle in westcentral Utah. Unpbl.Master's populationsin 197!, 10 yr before the high numberof Thesis.Brigham Young University,Provo, Utah. 40 triplets in 1981. PP. Acknowledgmentis due to DugwayProving Grounds EDWARDS,T.C.,JR., ANDg..w. COLLOPY.1983. Obligate (Dept. of the Army), J.M. Lockhart, E.W. Pearson,B. and facultativebrood reductionin eagles:an exami- Waddell,P.W. Wagnerand the GrandJunction office of nation of factors that influence fratricide. Auk the ColoradoDivision of Wildlife for contributingdata. 100:630-635. FALL 1984 SHORT COMMUNICATIONS 113 GORDON,S. 1955. The Golden Eagle. Collins, London. MURPHY,J.R., FJ. CAMENZIND,D.G. SMITH, AND J.B. 246 pp. WESTON.1969. Nestingecology of raptorialbirds in HICKMAN,G.L. [no date.] Life historyand ecologyof the central Utah. BrighamYoung Univ. Sci.Bull., Biol. Set. GoldenEagle in southwesternIdaho andsoutheastern 10:1-36. Oregon. U.S. Fishand Wildlife ServiceRep. 104 pp. NEWTON,I. 1979. Populationecology of raptors.Buteo HINMAN, R.A. [no date.] Antelope populations in Books,Vermillion, SouthDakota. 399 pp. southwesternUtah with specialreference to Golden OLENDORVV, R.R. i976. The food habits of North Eagle predation. CompletionRep., Fed. Aid. Proj. AmericanGolden Eagles. Amer. Midl, Nat. 95:231-236. W-65-R-6.61 pp. PHILLIPS,R.L., AND A.E. BESKE.1981. Golden Eagles LISH,J.W. 1975. Statusand ecologyof Bald Eaglesand and coal developmentin the eastern Powder River nestingof GoldenEagles in Oklahoma.MS Thesis. Basin of Wyoming. Unpubl. Rep. U.S. Fish and OklahomaState University,Norman, OK. 98 pp. Wildlife Service, Denver Wildlife Research Center, LOCKHART,J.M. 1976. The food habits,status and ecol- Denver, Colorado. 55 pp. ogy of nestingGolden Eagles in the Trans-Pecosre- REYNOLDS,H.V., III. 1969. Population status of the gion of Texas. MS Thesis.Sul RossState University, Golden Eagle in south-centralMontana. MS Thesis. Alpine, Texas. 65 pp. Universityof Montana,Missoula. MT. 61 pp. T.P. MCENEANEY, AND R.L. PHiL- STEENHOF, K., M.N. KOGHERT, AND J.H. LIPS. 1978. The effectsof coal developmenton the DOREMUS.1983. Nestingof subadukGolden Eagles ecologyof birdsof preyin southeasternMontana and in southwstern Idaho. Auk 100:743-747. northernWyoming. Annual Progress Rep. 1978.,Sec- TRUEBLOOD,T. 1982. The great rabbit roundup. F/e/d tion of Wildlife Ecologyon Public Lands, Denver and Stream 86(12):11,14,16. Wildlife ResearchCenter, Denver, Coloradopp. 9-14. WHITE,C.M., ANDT.L. THUROW.1984. Reproductionof D.W. HEATH, AND C.L. BE- Ferruginous Hawks exposed to controlled distur- LITSKY.1980. The statusof nesting Peregrine Fal- bance.Condor (in press). consand other selectedraptor specieson the Black Butte Mine Leaseand adjacentlands. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service- Final Rept. to the U.S. Bureauof Land Managementand Peter Kiewit Sons'Co. 59 pp. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Denver Wildlife Research MCGAHAN,J. 1966. Ecologyof the Golden Eagle. MS Center, Building 16, Federal Center, Denver, CO 80225. Ad. Thesis.University of Montana,Missoula, MT. 78 pp. dress of •econd author: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Federal MURP•Y,J.R. 1975. Statusof a GoldenEagle population Building, Room 1311, 125 South State Street, Salt Lake City, in central Utah, 1907-1973.In: J.R. Murphy, C.M. UT 84138. White and B.E. Harrell (eds.) Populationstatus of raptors.Raptor Res. Rep. No. 2. pp. 91-96 Received27 December,1983; Accepted11 June 1984. Food PiracyBetween European Kestreland Short-earedOwl ERKKI KORPIM/iki I studieda raptorcommunity of the largefield plainof 1984a). Although the 4 mostcommon species comprise Alajoki in Southern Ostrobothnia,western Finland (63ø the guild of open-terrainhunting birds of prey in the 05'N, 22ø55'E),from 1977through 1982(see KorpimSki, study area (KorpimSki 1978, 1981), inter- and intra- et al. 1977,1979). The mostnumerous raptor on thestudy specificfood piracyor kleptoparasitism(see Brockmann area was the Short-earedOwl (Asioflammeus)(315 total and Barnard [21979] for additional details on the terms) pairs, 39.4%), followedby European Kestrel (Falcotin- wasobserved only once.Consequently this case may be of nunculus)(36.2%), Long-eared Owl (A. otus) (20.0%), some interest. Northern Harrier (Circuscyaneus) (2.5%), Boreal Owl On 16 May 1982 at 2130 H, I sawa Short-caredOwl in (Aegoliusfunereus)(1.6%) and Sparrow Hawk (Accipiter the northern part of Alajoki flying over the field at the nisus) (0.3%); for addition details see Korpim/iki heightof about120 m and carryinga volein itstalons. The .
Recommended publications
  • Spatial Relationships of Nesting Golden Eagles in Central Utah
    White, C. M. 1974. The 1974 raptor surveyof the AlaskaPipeline between Franklin Bluffsand Big Delta. Unpubl.interim rep. to U.S.Fish and Wildl. Serv.,Anchorage, AK. 10 pp. White, C. M., T. D. Ray,and L. W. Sowl.1977. The 1970-1972-1974raptor surveys alongthe Trans-AlaskaOil Pipeline.pp. 199-221.In.' Chancellor,R.D. (ed.).World Conferenceon Birdsof Prey, Reportof the Proceedings.International Council for BirdPreservation. 440 pp. + appendices. SPATIAL RELATIONSHIPS OF NESTING GOLDEN EAGLES IN CENTRAL UTAH by DwightG. Smith• BiologyDepartment SouthernConnecticut State University New Haven, Connecticut 06515 and JosephR. Murphy Departmentof Zoology BrighamYoung University Provo, Utah 84602 Abstract We examinedthe distributionof GoldenEagle (Aquila chrysaetos)nest sites in the easternGreat Basinusing the Clark-Evansnearest-neighbor method of analysis.Distri- butionvalues indicated. uniform spacing of nestsites within the hills and ridges,which providedall of the potentialnesting sites in the studyarea. Analysis of GoldenEagle nestsite distributionwith three other large raptorssuggested a tendencytoward uni- form spacingbetween diurnal raptor speciesand aggregationwith the Great Horned Owl (Bubovirginianus). Introduction Odum(1971) suggested that populationsexhibit one of threedistribution patterns: (1) random,where habitat is homogenousand individualsdo not normallyinteract; (2) uni- form,where habitat is homogenousand individualscompete for one or moreresources; (3) aggregated,that mayresult from either heterogenous habitat or a tendencyto aggre- gatesocially. Newton (1979) noted that manyspecies exhibit uniform distribution of ter- ritoriesand nest sites except where available sites are limitedand concentrated,such as in the SnakeRiver Birds of PreyNatural Area. Our observationsof GoldenEagles in the easternGreat BasinDesert revealed a concentrationof nestsites in high, north-south orientedridges and hills but nonein interveningbroad, flat valleys.Herein we examine thisdistribution using the Clark-Evansnearest-neighbor model (1954).
    [Show full text]
  • The Occurrence and Reestablishment of White-Tailed Eagle and Golden Eagle As Breeding Birds in Denmark
    The occurrence and reestablishment of White-tailed Eagle and Golden Eagle as breeding birds in Denmark Erik EhmsEn, LEnnart PEdErsEn, hans meltoftE, tschErning cLausEn & timmE nyEgaard (Med et dansk resumé: Forekomst og genetablering af Havørn og Kongeørn som danske ynglefugle) Abstract Except for a number of largely unsuccessful breeding attempts during the second half of the 20th century, the White-tailed Eagle Haliaeetus albicilla had been absent as a breeding bird in Denmark for more than 80 years, when a popu- lation established itself during the second half of the 1990s. Released from persecution and contaminants the population has grown to 37 pairs in just 16 years. Reproductive success has grown with age and experience of the birds, so that the average number of fledged young per breeding pair peaked with almost two per pair 8-10 years after the establishment of each breeding pair. Similarly, the Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos reestablished a small population in Denmark from 1999 onwards after probably having bred here until about 150 years ago. For both species, this success was facilitated by conservation efforts including protection zones around eagle nests, monitoring and public outreach mainly carried out by volunteers from the Danish Ornithological Society / BirdLife Denmark. Introduction in former times, while the White-tailed Eagle bred in The reestablishment of White-tailed Eagle Haliaee- Denmark until it was driven extinct by persecution tus albicilla and Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos as in 1912 (Løppenthin 1967). The latter species made breeding birds in Denmark in the 1990s is one of a number of – usually unsuccessful – breeding at- the greatest achievements in modern Danish bird tempts during the second half of the 20th century, and nature conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Possible DRAFT Rule Language to Cover Taking Young
    Attachment 3 DIVISION 55 FALCONRY LICENSES, PERMITS AND REQUIREMENTS 635-055-0000 Definition of Terms For the purpose of these rules, the following definitions apply: (1) "Captive bred" means any raptor, including eggs, hatched in captivity resulting from parents that mated in captivity, or are the progeny of artificial insemination. (2) "Falconry" is caring for and training raptors for pursuit of game, and the sport of hunting wild game with raptors. (3) “Indigenous raptor”, for purposes of falconry, means golden eagle (Aquila chrysaetos), sharp-shinned hawk (Accipter striatus), Cooper’s hawk (Accipter cooperii), northern goshawk (Accipter gentilis), red-tailed hawk (Buteo jamaicensis), American kestrel (Falco sparverius), merlin (Falco columbarius), prairie falcon (Falco mexicanus), peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus), gyrfalcon (Falco rusticolus, and great horned owl (Bubo virginianus), (4) “Management or operational activities” means activities on nest-site structures (bridges or buildings) that are operational or maintenance actions to the structure deemed necessary by the structure owners or managers. These activities do not include nest entries for the purposes of banding birds for scientific purposes. (4) (5) “Passage” means first year migrant raptors capable of flight. (5) (6) “Post-fledgling” means a young first-year bird capable of flight which has recently flown from its nest. (6)(7) "Raptor" means any species or hybrid of the families Strigidae, Falconidae and Accipitridae. (7)(8) “Raptors at hack” means the intentional release of a raptor as a training technique, with the expectation of recapture after a period of time. (8)(9) "Take", for the purposes of these rules, means to trap, capture, or attempt to trap or capture a raptor from the wild for the purpose of falconry.
    [Show full text]
  • Predation by a Golden Eagle on a Brown Bear Cub
    SHORT COMMUNICATION N Sørensen et al. Predation by a golden eagle on a brown bear cub Ole J. Sørensen1,4, Mogens Totsa˚ s2, Tore eagles attending bears. Murie hypothesized that Solstad2, and Robin Rigg3 eagles attending bears were waiting for opportunities to capture prey trying to escape from the bears. He 1North-Trondelag University College, Department of also observed eagles swooping at and diving low over Natural Resource Sciences and Information Technology, grizzlies and other carnivores, but interpreted this Box 2501, N-7729 Steinkjer, Norway behavior as play or curiosity, rather than predation. 2 Norwegian Nature Inspectorate, N-7485 Trondheim, C. McIntyre (US National Park Service, Fair- Norway 3 banks, Alaska, USA, personal communication, 2008), Slovak Wildlife Society, PO Box 72, 033 01 Liptovsky a golden eagle researcher in Denali National Park for Hradok, Slovakia many years, has never seen an eagle attack a bear, although she has often observed eagles following Abstract: During spring 2004 an adult female brown bears in open terrain, perhaps positioning themselves bear (Ursus arctos) and her 3 cubs-of-the-year were to take prey escaping from the bear as suggested by observed outside their den on a south-facing low- Murie. Commensalistic hunting, as well as curious or alpine slope in central Norway. They remained near play behavior by eagles in the vicinity of bears, could the den for 8–10 days and were, except for one day, be misinterpreted as eagles hunting, attacking, or observed daily by Totsa˚s and other wardens of the inspecting bears as possible prey. Predation by eagles Norwegian Nature Inspectorate.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eagle Huntress Ancient Traditions and New Generations
    1 The Eagle Huntress Ancient Traditions and New Generations By Adrienne Mayor [email protected] May 1, 2016 "The sight of a Eurasian nomad hunting with swift horse, loyal dog, and powerful golden eagle is a majestic scene with ancient roots. For thousands of years this was how the nomadic peoples of the northern steppes from the Caucasus to Manchuria hunted for survival. " This is a revised and expanded version of the two-part article that appeared April 5-6, 2016 online at ancient-origins.net and reprinted April 18, 2016 http://bust.com/feminism/16147-the-untold-history-of-the-eagle-huntress.html "A fast horse and a soaring eagle are the wings of a nomad." --Kazakh proverb 2 FIG 1. Kazakh eagle hunter (Shutterstock) Falconry, training raptors to hunt for game, is particularly suited to vast grasslands especially in combination with horses and dogs. The earliest images of falconry appear in Assyrian and Hittite reliefs of the 9th and 8th centuries BC. Classical Greek and Roman authors Ctesias, Aristotle, Pliny, and Aelian described falconry. A Persian textile (10th century AD) depicts the Banu (Lady Governor) of Rayy (ancient Rhages, near Tehran, northern Iran) riding with her falcon. In AD 1270 Marco Polo described how the nomads of Central Asia hunted on horseback with small falcons, hawks, and eagles. FIG 2. Banu (Lady Governor) of Rayy, Persian textile, 10th century AD 3 For thousands of years, golden eagles have been the favorite raptor to train as a hunting companion across the northern steppes from the Caucasus to China. Eagles are strong predators especially adapted to winter hunting for hare, marmot, wild goat, deer, fox (even lynx, pallas cat, and wolf, although these are unnatural prey and dangerous for the eagles).
    [Show full text]
  • Golden Eagle
    A publication by: NORTHWEST WILDLIFE PRESERVATION SOCIETY Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos Photograph by Jim Crotty (Flickr) By Jennifer Chow The golden eagle is the largest bird-of-prey in North America, and one of only two eagle species in Canada along with the bald eagle. They are graceful, powerful, swift and agile raptors. Some regard the golden eagle as one of the most formidable birds on Earth. Sightings of this beautiful raptor are rare, but always exciting and memorable. Golden eagles are symbols of freedom and majesty throughout their range. NWPS Headquarters NWPS Vancouver Island t Vancouver 604.568.9160 720-1190 Melville Street PO Box 39058 t Victoria 778.967.3379 Vancouver, BC V6E 3W1 RPO James Bay e [email protected] Victoria, BC V8V 4X8 w www.northwestwildlife.com Characteristics Golden Eagles are dark brown with golden-brown feathers on their head and necks, giving them their namesake; with yellow feet, black claws and beak, and feathers going all the way down to the toes, they are truly an impressive sight. They are large birds measuring 70 to 84cm (28 to 33 inches) in height with a 210 cm (84 in) wingspan. Females are typically larger than males, with females weighing 5 kg (11 lbs) and males slightly less. Other than the size difference, males and females look alike. Their feathers actually weigh more than their bones and golden eagles can have around 7,000 feathers! Very young chicks are covered in a white down, with dark feathers as they grow in. Young golden eagles have defined white patches at the tail base and in the wings for the first few years.
    [Show full text]
  • Pocket Guide to Raptors of the Pembina Valley Region, Manitoba
    A POCKET FIELD GUIDE TO RAPTORS OF THE PEMBINA VALLEY REGION www.arocha.ca TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements . 3 Introduction . 4 Osprey About raptors . 5 Vulture Osprey How to use this guide . 6 Turkey Vulture Glossary . 7 Vultures (Turkey Vulture) . 9 Osprey . 11 Eagles . 13 Harrier Bald Eagle . 13 Northern Harrier Golden Eagle . 15 Harriers (Northern Harrier) . 17 Eagle Accipiters . 19 Bald Eagle Sharp-shinned Hawk . 19 Golden Eagle Cooper’s Hawk . 21 Northern Goshawk . 23 Accipiter Buteos . 25 Sharp-shinned Hawk Broad-winged Hawk . 25 Cooper’s Hawk Swainson’s Hawk . 26 Northern Goshawk Red-tailed Hawk . 27 Rough-legged Hawk . 31 Falcons . 33 Falcon Buteo American Kestrel . 33 American Kestrel Broad-winged Hawk Merlin Swainson’s Hawk Merlin . 35 Gyrfalcon Red-tailed Hawk Peregrine Falcon . 37 Peregrine Falcon Ferruginous Hawk Rare raptors in the Pembina Valley Region . 39 Rough-legged Hawk Check-list of raptors . 40 Bibliography . 41 1 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS INTRODUCTION Funding for this pocket guide was provided by Birds of prey have fascinated people through the the Canadian Wildlife Federation, Manitoba ages. They have appeared in the courts of kings, Tourism Secretariat and A Rocha donors. Special on the arms of falconers and have been studied thanks goes to the following people who by many biologists and scientists. For anyone provided photographs: Alfred Aug, Vic Berardi, who has grown up on the prairies, the lazy Gordon Court, Jerry Liguori, Bob Shettler, Phil circling of a hawk on a warm summer day is an Swanson, Dennis Swayze, Robert Visconti and iconic memory. Historically persecuted for their Brian Wheeler.
    [Show full text]
  • Golden Eagle (Aquila Chrysaetos)
    Golden Eagle (Aquila chrysaetos) NMPIF level: Biodiversity Conservation Concern, Level 2 (BC2) NMPIF assessment score: 12 NM stewardship responsibility: Low National PIF status: No special status New Mexico BCRs: 16, 18, 34, 35 Primary breeding habitat(s): Cave/Rock/Cliff (often mountain canyons near open grassland or shrubland) Other Habitats used: Widespread foraging across multiple habitat types Summary of Concern Golden Eagle is a widespread raptor of Europe, Asia, and North America. Although trends appear stable, this species is vulnerable due to its relatively small population size and various sources of mortality, including habitat loss or degradation. Associated Species Ferruginous Hawk (SC1), Red-tailed Hawk, Peregrine Falcon (BC1), Prairie Falcon (SC2), White-throated Swift (SC2), Common Raven Distribution Golden Eagles breed across a great range of latitudes in North America, from the Brooks Range in Alaska south to central Mexico. The species also breeds in Europe and Asia. In the United States, Golden Eagle is resident in all western states, with a breeding range extending east into the Great Plains. United States populations increase in winter with the arrival of migrants from northern breeding areas. In New Mexico, Golden Eagles breed locally in suitable habitat throughout the state (Kochert et al. 2002, Parmeter et al. 2002). Ecology and Habitat Requirements During the breeding season, Golden Eagle occurs primarily in areas of mountain cliffs or canyons. In the west, it is often associated with rimrock terrain adjacent to open desert or grassland areas. Suitable nesting sites may exist within a variety of surrounding habitats, from desert to mountain areas, although dense forests tend to be avoided.
    [Show full text]
  • BEAR CART the Following Items Should Be on the Cart, If They Are Not
    BEAR CART The following items should be on the cart, if they are not let someone in education know. If you discover a new problem with any biofact (broken pieces, loose teeth, etc.), it is your responsibility to let the staff know and make a notation with the date, time and your name on the sign out clipboard. Note: Please return all items to their appropriate place on the cart, and make sure lids and bungee cords are secured. Things should be left exactly as you found them. Note: Do not try to open the Lucite containers with the food. We are trying to prevent animals from getting into the bone room. BEAR CART INVENTORY • Black Bear skull • Kodiak Bear skull • Kodiak Bear front leg including the scapula, humerus, radius, and ulna (see note below) • Kodiak Bear paw with claws • Black Bear, Polar Bear & Lion claw • Kodiak Bear pelt • Box of Bear’s Bile Powder - Traditional Chinese medicine (DO NOT OPEN BOX!!) • 2 lucite boxes containing grizzly bear and polar bear food • Golden Eagle egg • Golden Eagle leg/foot • Bears Resource Notebook Note: You will need large piece of AstroTurf if you intend to use the leg bones. Please do not place bones directly on the ground. Lay the bones on the AstroTurf starting with the humerus at the top; visitors can then lie down next to them to see how tall they are in relation to an adult male Kodiak bear. Remember this “shoulder” height is with the bear standing on all four legs. Do not let the public pick up the bones, they are heavy.
    [Show full text]
  • Eagle Conservation Plan Guidance Module 1 — Land-Based Wind Energy
    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Eagle Conservation Plan Guidance Module 1 – Land-based Wind Energy Version 2 Credit: Brian Millsap/USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Division of Migratory Bird Management April 2013 i Disclaimer This Eagle Conservation Plan Guidance is not intended to, nor shall it be construed to, limit or preclude the Service from exercising its authority under any law, statute, or regulation, or from taking enforcement action against any individual, company, or agency. This Guidance is not meant to relieve any individual, company, or agency of its obligations to comply with any applicable Federal, state, tribal, or local laws, statutes, or regulation. This Guidance by itself does not prevent the Service from referring cases for prosecution, whether a company has followed it or not. ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. Overview Of all America’s wildlife, eagles hold perhaps the most revered place in our national history and culture. The United States has long imposed special protections for its bald and golden eagle populations. Now, as the nation seeks to increase its production of domestic energy, wind energy developers and wildlife agencies have recognized a need for specific guidance to help make wind energy facilities compatible with eagle conservation and the laws and regulations that protect eagles. To meet this need, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has developed the Eagle Conservation Plan Guidance (ECPG). This document provides specific in‐depth guidance for conserving bald and golden eagles in the course of siting, constructing, and operating wind energy facilities. The ECPG guidance supplements the Service’s Land‐Based Wind Energy Guidelines (WEG).
    [Show full text]
  • Golden Eagle Migration
    FALL 2019 IN THIS ISSUE: Golden Eagle Migration Profile In Conservation: Tim Schaeffer, PA Fish & Boat Commission Bear Mange in PA Prescribed Fire—Land Management Tool and more! FOUNDATION fall 2019 FOUNDATION CONTENTS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR MESSAGE Wildlife for Everyone Foundation 341 Science Park Road, Suite 103 State College, PA 16803-2287 (814) 238-8138 Photo© Mark Nale Mark Photo© [email protected] 4 8 10 BOARD OF DIRECTORS CHAIRMAN Russ Schleiden FEATURES: utumn is to Wildlife for PRESIDENT Aone of my Everyone so that Janet Nyce 4 PENNSYLVANIA PLAYS PROMINENT ROLE IN favorite seasons in we may expand TREASURER GOLDEN EAGLE MIGRATION Bill Bennett Pennsylvania. I love our activities SECRETARY By Greg Grove. PA’s location central to migration corridor. how the verdant and increase our Michael Schaul GETTING A READ ON BEAR MANGE trees morph into Great Egret in Tom Ridge Wetlands impact across the John Blaschak 8 Margaret Brittingham By Asher Jones. Researchers look for answers to rise in disease. yellow, red, and state. If you are Ashley Diehl orange hues. I love the cozy warmth of fleece already a contributor to Wildlife for Everyone, James Eckles PROFILE IN CONSERVATION John Frailey 10 sweaters as the air turns chilly. please consider giving more. Mike Harpster By Barbara Schroeder. Featuring Tim Schaeffer, PFBC. When you love nature, it transcends all When I first started raising money for non- Gregory Isabella Ralph Martone CONSERVATION SUCCESS STORY four seasons. Wildlife for Everyone works profits, I felt a little uncomfortable asking people Reed McCormick 14 hard all year long for all nature lovers and to give more.
    [Show full text]
  • Golden Eagle Pointers
    Golden Eagle Pointers Golden eagles winter in the blufflands of southeast Minnesota, western Wisconsin and northeast Iowa. Although these elusive raptors can be tougher to find than bald eagles that also winter in the Mississippi River valley, taking the time in the right habitat and knowing what to look for can improve your chances. Here are some tips from National Eagle Center Education Director and Golden Eagle Project Co-­‐coordinator Scott Mehus for finding and identifying golden eagles. Distinguishing golden eagles in flight • Raptors seen in the winter months with a DIHEDRAL (V) should stop traffic! That raptor could be an unseasonably late or early Turkey Vulture, eagle, wintering golden rough-­‐legged hawk or Northern Harrier, all birds worth getting out to see! About 80 % of the time when I observe a Golden in a full soar I see it al. using a slight dihedr Definitely not as pronounced as a Turkey Vultures classic dihedral, but much more ld than the Ba Eagles’ flat as a board profile. • Notice the almost headless appearance a of golden eagle. Obviously it is not headless, but the projecting head is e about on third the length of it’s tail and when compared with seeing ald a b eagle overhead, which has as much head projecting out ail in front as there is t sticking out behind, this gives the golden eagle an almost headless appearance. • Notice that wings pinch in at the body along the trailing edge of the wing. This makes the secondary flight feathers bulge out and gives the wing more curvature, different d than the unpinche straight plank like trailing edge of ve a Bald.
    [Show full text]