Sudden Fmin Enhancements and Sudden Cosmic Noise Absorptions

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sudden Fmin Enhancements and Sudden Cosmic Noise Absorptions J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 27, 95-112, 1975 Sudden fminEnhancements and Sudden Cosmic Noise Absorptions Associated with Solar X-Ray Flares Teruo SATo Physics Department, Hyogo College of Medicine, Mukogawa-cho, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan (Received November 28, 1974; Revised May 23, 1975) Sudden fmin enhancements (SFmE's) and sudden cosmic noise absorptions (SCNA's) associated with increments of X-ray fluxes during solar flares are studied on the basis of X-ray flux data measured by SOLRAD 9 and 10 satel- lites. Some statistical analyses on SFmE's observed at five observatories in Japan, corresponding to increased X-ray fluxes in the 1-8 A band are made for 50 solar flare events during the period January 1972 to December 1973, and value of fmin is expressed as functions of cos x(x; solar zenith angle) and 1-8 A band X-ray flux. Similar study is also made for SCNA's observed by 30 MHz riometer at Hiraiso for 15 great solar flare events during the same period, together with 27.6 MHz riometer data reported by SCHWENTEK(1973) and 18 MHz data published by DESHPANDEand MITRA (1972b). It is found that fm, value (MHz) and SCNA value (L, dB) of a radio wave with frequency f(MHz) are related to X-ray flux (F0, ergcm-2 sec-1) in the 1-8A band and to cos x, by following approximate expressions, fmin(MHz)=l0Fo4cos1/2x, L(dB)=4.37X103f-2Fo2cosx, respectively. Blackout seems to occur for Fo values causing fmin's greater than about 5 MHz. It is shown that these expressions can be derived from a brief theoretical calculation of radio wave absorption in the lower ionosphere. Also it is suggested that threshold X-ray fluxes in the 1-8 A band which may pro- duce a minimum SFME(2MHz), blackout and minimum SCNA (0.27-0.36dB for 30 MHz noise) are 1.6x10-3, 6.2x10-2 and (3-8)x10-3erg cm-2 sec-1, re- spectively, for cos x=1. 1. Introduction It has been well established that enhanced X-ray emissions associated with solar flares produce excess ionizations at various heights of the ionosphere and cause sudden ionospheric disturbances (SID's). Especially, X-ray emissions with wavelengths less than 10 A produce intense ionizations at levels below A about 100km (KREPLINet al., 1962; ALLEN, 1965) and they are responsible for 95 96 T. SATO sudden fmin enhancement (abbreviated as SFmE), or blackout (BO) in the vertical incidence sounding, as well as sudden fieldstrength anomaly (SFA), sudden en- hancement of atmospherics (SEA), sudden phase anomaly (SPA) and sudden cosmic noise absorption (SCNA). In recent years X-ray emissions mainly with wavelengths less than 20 A have been monitored continuously by satellites, and using these data a number of authors have studied various X-ray flare effects in the lower ionosphere and propagation of radio waves. For example, KREPLIN et al. (1970) reported a relationship between flare X-ray and radio wave emission. SENGUPTA (1971) treated X-ray effects on VLF and HF wave propagations and electron concentration profiles. In a series of papers DESHPANDE et al. (1972a, b), DESHPANDE and MITRA (1972a, b, c) and MITRA and ROWE (1972) made an extensive analysis on various kinds of the SID effects including variations of wave field intensity, phase height, ionization profile and cosmic noise ab- sorption. Recently, OHLE et al. (1974) pointed out that flare X-ray effects in the lower ionosphere depend strongly on season and solar zenith angle, and TAUBENHEIM et al. (1974) analysed phase-height variations in SFA effects. In spite of the comprehensive studies mentioned above, SFmE's during solar flares have been studied very little up to date. Also quantitative relation- ship between X-ray fluxes and SCNA values seems to be not yet established. The aim of this paper is to examine statistically fmin,and SCNA values corre- sponding to X-ray fluxes during solar flares and to try to derive expressions showing dependence of fmin and SCNA on X-ray flux and solar zenith angle. A brief theory is presented to endorse the two derived expressions. Also thresh- old X-ray fluxes which will produce, respectively, minimum fmin blackout and minimum SCNA are estimated. 2. Data Data on solar X-ray flux analysed in this work are those in the 1-8 A band for 50 solar X-ray flare events during the period January 1972 to December 1973 measured by SOLRAD 9 and 10 satellites which were reported in SOLAR- GEOPHYSICAL DATA (1972-1974). The corresponding fmin data are taken from f-plots at Wakkanai (45.4N, 141.7E), Akita (39.7N, 140.1E), Kokubunji (35.7N, 139.5E), Yamagawa (31.2N, 130.6E) and Okinawa (26.3N, 127.8E), published in IONOSPHERICDATA IN JAPAN (1972, 1973). Values of f minmeasured at observatories in other countries are not used because capa- bilities of instruments might be different from those in Japan. Performances of instruments used for ionospheric vertical sounding at Japanese observatories are approximately the same, therefore, in this study they are assumed to be all the same. Some details of them are shown in Table 1. Analysed data for SCNA fmin Enhancements and SCNA's during Solar X-ray Flares 97 Table 1. Typical performance specifications of instru- ments for ionospheric vertical sounding in Japanese observatories. events are 30 MHz riometer data for 15 large flares observed at Hiraiso (36.4N, 140.6E), Japan, which are available from the data in 1972 and 1973, and in addition to this, 27.6 MHz riometer data observed at Lindau (51.7N, 10.1 E) during the period July 28 to August 12 1972, reported by SCHWENTEK (1973), and 18 MHz data published by DESHPANDEand MITRA (1972b), which were recorded at Delhi (28.6N, 77.2E) and other stations during 1967-1969, are used for comparison with Japanese data. 3. Results 3.1 Sudden fmin enhancement (SFmE) 3.1.1 Statistical results Figure 1 shows some examples of fmin enhancements associated with in- creased solar X-ray fluxes (i.e. SFmE's) observed at Yamagawa in Japan and Rostov in USSR. The figure indicates a clear one-to-one correspondence be- tween X-ray flux and fmin enhancement. Figure 2 demonstrates seasonal and local time distributions of occurrence number of distinct SFmE's (including blackout) such as are shown in Fig. 1, who have peak fmin values larger than 3 MHz for the 1-8 A band fluxes exceeding 1 X 10-2ergcm-2 sec-1, observed at five observatories in Japan during the period January 1972 to October 1974. (The X-ray data measured from SOLRAD satellites were presented until April 1974. After May fmin enhancements which are regarded obviously as flare- associated enhancements are counted as SFmEevents.) Each SFmEis numbered when fmin enhancements are observed simultaneously at least at three observato- ries. The peak fmin, 3 MHz, is tentatively determined to be the threshold value, 98 T. SATO Fig. 1. An example of correspondence between solar X-ray flux enhancements in the 0-3 and 1-8 A bands and sudden fmin enhancements (SFmE's) which were observed during the period April 30 to May 3 Values of fmin are taken from f -plots at Yamagawa (31.2N, 130.6E) and Rostov (47.2N, 39.7E). 1972 1973 1974 Fig. 2. Occurrence number of sudden fmin enhancements (SFmE's, above 3 MHz) for 1-8 A fluxes greater than 1 x 10-2erg cm-2 sec-1, observed at five observatories in Japan during the period January 1972 to October 1974. The enhancement is numbered when the event occurred simulta- neously at least at three observatories. fmin Enhancements and SCNA's during Solar X-ray Flares 99 because normal f minexceeds usually 2 MHz in the daytime in summer. Thin lines in Fig. 2 represent that fmin is between 3 and 5 MHz, whereas thick lines re- present that fmin.is greater than 5 MHz or blackout occurs. It is recognized from this figure that there is a tendency that SFmE's occur mainly in equinoxes and summer in a wide range of local time, whereas in winter they take place in a narrow time range centered on local noon. These results, which seem to in- dicate an seasonal and local time dependence of SFmE, is presumed from a viewpoint that SFmE's are caused due to excess absorption of radio waves pass- ing through flare-associated ionization layers, whose magnitudes and locations depend on both X-ray flux and cos x (x; solar zenith angle) (CHAPMAN,1931). Since solar flares occur irregularly in time, we cannot exclude a possibility that SFmE's in any other year occur more often in winter than in summer or equi- noxes. But this possibility seems to be low because X-ray flares responsible for SFmE's in winter are comparatively great flares. In fact, SFmE's in winter i Fig. 2 occur for the 1-8 A fluxes exceeding about 1 X 10-1erg cm-2 sec-1, whereas other SFmE's occur for the fluxes larger than about 1 x 10-2erg cm-2 sec-1. The relation of SFmEoccurrence to cos x is also expected from results demonstrated by OBAYASHI (1970), showing a dependence of fmin ion cos x. In order to examine the relationship among fmin, X-ray flux (F0)and cos x, fmin values (fmin'S)for 30 great X-ray events during the period January 1972 to December 1973 are plotted in Fig. 3 against X-ray flux in the 1-8 A band and cos X value.
Recommended publications
  • Spectrum Management Technical Handbook
    NTIA TN 89-2 SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT TECHNICAL HANDBOOK TECHNICAL NOTE SERIES NTIA TECHNICAL NOTE 89-2 SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT TECHNICAL HANDBOOK l U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Robert A. Mosbacher, Secretary Alfred C. Sikes, Assistant Secretary for Communications and Information JULY 1989 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT NT IA acknowledges the efforts of Mark Schellhammer in the completion of Phase I of this handbook (Sections 1-3). Other portions will be added as resources are available. ABSTRACT This handbook is a compilation of the procedures, definitions, relationships and conversions essential to electromagnetic compatibility analysis. It is intended as a reference for NTIA engineers. KEY WORDS CONVERSION FACTORS COUPLING EQUATIONS DEFINITIONS ·TECHNICAL RELATIONSHIPS iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Subsection Page SECTION 1 TECHNICAL TERMS:DEFINITIONS AND NOTATION TERMS AND DEFINITIONS . .. .. 1-1 GLOSSARY OF STANDARD NOTATION . .. 1-13 SECTION 2 TECHNICAL RELATIONSHIPS AND CONVERSION FACTORS INTRODUCTION . .. .. .. 2-1 TRANSMISSION LOSS FOR RADIO LINKS . �. .. .. 2-1 Propagation Loss . .. .. .. 2-1 Transmission Loss ........................................ 2-2 Free-Space Basic Transmission Loss .......................... 2-2 Basic Transmission Loss .................................... 2-2 Loss Relative to Free-Space .................................. 2-2 System Loss . .. 2-3 ; Total Loss . .. .. 2-3 ANTENNA CHARACTERISTICS . .. 2-3 Antenna Directivity ........................................ 2-3 Antenna Gain and Efficiency .................................. 2-3 I
    [Show full text]
  • A Novel Ship Target Detection Algorithm Based on Error Self-Adjustment Extreme Learning Machine and Cascade Classifier
    Cognitive Computation (2019) 11:110–124 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-018-9606-5 A Novel Ship Target Detection Algorithm Based on Error Self-adjustment Extreme Learning Machine and Cascade Classifier Wandong Zhang1,2 · Qingzhong Li1 · Q. M. Jonathan Wu2 · Yimin Yang3 · Ming Li1 Received: 30 June 2018 / Accepted: 10 October 2018 / Published online: 24 October 2018 © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract High-frequency surface wave radar (HFSWR) has a vital civilian and military significance for ship target detection and tracking because of its wide visual field and large sea area coverage. However, most of the existing ship target detection methods of HFSWR face two main difficulties: (1) the received radar signals are strongly polluted by clutter and noises, and (2) it is difficult to detect ship targets in real-time due to high computational complexity. This paper presents a ship target detection algorithm to overcome the problems above by using a two-stage cascade classification structure. Firstly, to quickly obtain the target candidate regions, a simple gray-scale feature and a linear classifier were applied. Then, a new error self-adjustment extreme learning machine (ES-ELM) with Haar-like input features was adopted to further identify the target precisely in each candidate region. The proposed ES-ELM includes two parts: initialization part and updating part. In the former stage, the L1 regularizer process is adopted to find the sparse solution of output weights, to prune the useless neural nodes and to obtain the optimal number of hidden neurons. Also, to ensure an excellent generalization performance by the network, in the latter stage, the parameters of hidden layer are updated through several iterations using L2 regularizer process with pulled back error matrix.
    [Show full text]
  • Transmitter T (X) Channel E (X) Receiver R
    Analog Communication ( 10EC53 ) Introduction The function of the communication system is to make available at the destination a signal originating at a distant point. This signal is called the desired signal. Unfortunately, during the passage of the signal through the channel and front-end of the receiver, this desired signal gets corrupted by a number of undesired signals. This is referred to as Noise. Noise is any unknown or unwanted signal. Noise is the static you hear in the speaker when you tune any AM or FM receiver to any position between stations. It is also the snow or confetti that is visible on a TV screen. The received signal is modeled as r (t) = s (t) + n (t) Where s (t) is the transmitted/desired signal n (t) is the additive noise/unwanted signal The signal n (t) gets added at the channel. It disturbs the transmission and processing of signal in Communication System. Over which one cannot have a control. In general term it is an unwanted signal that affects a wanted signal. It is a random signal that cannot be represented with a simple equation. But some time can be deterministic components (power supply hum, certain oscillations).Deterministic Components can be eliminated by proper shielding and introduction of notch filters. If their were no noise perfect communication would be possible with minimum transmitted power. At the receiver only amplification of the signal power to the desired level is required. If R (x)=T (x) then e (x)=0 Transmitter Receiver T (x) R (x) If R (x) ≠ T (x) then e (x) ≠ 0.The received signal is corrupted.
    [Show full text]
  • Demodulation, Bit-Error Probability and Diversity Arrangements
    RADIO SYSTEMS – ETIN15 Lecture no: 6 Demodulation, bit-error probability and diversity arrangements Anders J Johansson, Department of Electrical and Information Technology [email protected] 5 April 2017 1 Contents • Receiver noise calculations [Covered briefly in Chapter 3 of textbook!] • Optimal receiver and bit error probability – Principle of maximum-likelihood receiver – Error probabilities in non-fading channels – Error probabilities in fading channels • Diversity arrangements – The diversity principle – Types of diversity – Spatial (antenna) diversity performance 5 April 2017 2 RECEIVER NOISE 5 April 2017 3 Receiver noise Noise sources The noise situation in a receiver depends on several noise sources Noise picked up Wanted by the antenna signal Output signal Analog Detector with requirement circuits on quality Thermal noise 5 April 2017 4 Receiver noise Equivalent noise source To simplify the situation, we replace all noise sources with a single equivalent noise source. Wanted How do we determine Noise free signal N from the other sources? N Output signal C Analog Detector with requirement circuits on quality Noise free Same “input quality”, signal-to-noise ratio, C/N in the whole chain. 5 April 2017 5 Receiver noise Examples • Thermal noise is caused by random movements of electrons in circuits. It is assumed to be Gaussian and the power is proportional to the temperature of the material, in Kelvin. • Atmospheric noise is caused by electrical activity in the atmosphere, e.g. lightning. This noise is impulsive in its nature and below 20 MHz it is a dominating. • Cosmic noise is caused by radiation from space and the sun is a major contributor.
    [Show full text]
  • All You Need to Know About SINAD Measurements Using the 2023
    applicationapplication notenote All you need to know about SINAD and its measurement using 2023 signal generators The 2023A, 2023B and 2025 can be supplied with an optional SINAD measuring capability. This article explains what SINAD measurements are, when they are used and how the SINAD option on 2023A, 2023B and 2025 performs this important task. www.ifrsys.com SINAD and its measurements using the 2023 What is SINAD? C-MESSAGE filter used in North America SINAD is a parameter which provides a quantitative Psophometric filter specified in ITU-T Recommendation measurement of the quality of an audio signal from a O.41, more commonly known from its original description as a communication device. For the purpose of this article the CCITT filter (also often referred to as a P53 filter) device is a radio receiver. The definition of SINAD is very simple A third type of filter is also sometimes used which is - its the ratio of the total signal power level (wanted Signal + unweighted (i.e. flat) over a broader bandwidth. Noise + Distortion or SND) to unwanted signal power (Noise + The telephony filter responses are tabulated in Figure 2. The Distortion or ND). It follows that the higher the figure the better differences in frequency response result in different SINAD the quality of the audio signal. The ratio is expressed as a values for the same signal. The C-MES signal uses a reference logarithmic value (in dB) from the formulae 10Log (SND/ND). frequency of 1 kHz while the CCITT filter uses a reference of Remember that this a power ratio, not a voltage ratio, so a 800 Hz, which results in the filter having "gain" at 1 kHz.
    [Show full text]
  • Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR Or S/N) SNR Is the Ratio of the Signal Power to Noise Power
    JAWAHARLAL NEHRU TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY KAKINADA KAKINADA – 533 001 , ANDHRA PRADESH GATE Coaching Classes as per the Direction of Ministry of Education GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH Analog Communication 26-05-2020 to 06-07-2020 Prof. Ch. Srinivasa Rao Dept. of ECE, JNTUK-UCE Vizianagaram Analog Communication-Day 7, 01-06-2020 Presentation Outline Noise: • Noise and its types • Thermal Noise • Parameters of Noise • Noise in Baseband Communication systems • Gaussian process and NB Noise • Problems 02-06-2020 Prof.Ch.Srinivasa Rao, JNTUK UCEV 2 Learning Outcomes • At the end of this Session, Student will be able to: • LO 1 : Fundamental aspects of Noise • LO 2 : Different Noise types and its Paraneters • LO 3 : Gaussian Process and ND Noise 02-06-2020 Prof.Ch.Srinivasa Rao, JNTUK UCEV 3 Noise Definitions of Noise: • Noise is unwanted signal that affects wanted signal. • Noise can broadly be defined as any unknown signal that affects the recovery of the desired signal. • Noise is an unwanted signal, which interferes with the original message signal and corrupts the parameters of the message signal. This alteration in the communication process, leads to the message getting altered. It most likely enters at the channel or the receiver. Effect of noise • Degrades system performance (Analog and digital) • Receiver cannot distinguish signal from noise • Efficiency of communication system reduces Most common examples of noise are: • Hiss sound in radio receivers • Buzz sound amidst of telephone conversations • Flicker in television receivers, Noise Sources External Internal Noise Noise Atmospheric Industrial Extraterrestrial Solar Noise Cosmic Noise External Noise : • It is due to Man- made and natural resources • Sources over which we have no control such as thunders, snow fall, lightning etc.
    [Show full text]
  • AN10062 Phase Noise Measurement Guide for Oscillators
    Phase Noise Measurement Guide for Oscillators Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 1 2 What is phase noise ................................................................................................................................. 2 3 Methods of phase noise measurement ................................................................................................... 3 4 Connecting the signal to a phase noise analyzer ..................................................................................... 4 4.1 Signal level and thermal noise ......................................................................................................... 4 4.2 Active amplifiers and probes ........................................................................................................... 4 4.3 Oscillator output signal types .......................................................................................................... 5 4.3.1 Single ended LVCMOS ........................................................................................................... 5 4.3.2 Single ended Clipped Sine ..................................................................................................... 5 4.3.3 Differential outputs ............................................................................................................... 6 5 Setting up a phase noise analyzer ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE SPACE COMMUNICATION THEORY and PRACTICE a Graduate Project Submitted in Partial Satisfac
    CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, NORTHRIDGE SPACE COMMUNICATION THEORY AND PRACTICE A graduate project submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of the Masterr of Science 1n Engineering by Kristine Patricia Maine January, 1983 The project of Kristine Patricia Maine is approved: CDr. Ste~en A. Gad~ski) (Dr. ~y H. Pettit, Chair) California State University, Northridge ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS A deep sense of gratitude is expressed to my academic advisor, Dr. Ray Pettit, for his invaluable counsel and advisement during the course of this study. In addition, I express thanks to The Aerospace Corporation for the use of their facilities and personnel for the completion of this document. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Page Acknowledgement iii Table of Figures v List of Tables vii List of Symbols viii Abstract xi I. Introduction 1 II. Space Communication System Components 2 III. Theory of Link Analysis 8 IV. Applications of Link Analysis 21 v. Summary 41 Appendix A--Signal Losses 45 Appendix B--Space Shuttle Design Model 54 Appendix C--Communication Satellite Systems 62 Footnotes 67 Bi biliography 70 iv TABLE OF FIGURES Figure Number Title 1 Simplified Transponder Block Diagram 3 Showing a Single Channel Transponder 2 TWT Characteristics 4 3 Typical Antenna Beamwidth Pattern 7 4 Satellite Communication System 9 5 Uplink Model 10 6 Downlink Model 13 7 Satellite Communication Transmitter­ 16 to-Receiver with Typical Loss and Noise Sources 8 Zenith Attenuation Values Expected to 18 be Exceeded 2% of the Year at Mid­ latitudes 9 Probability
    [Show full text]
  • 19710023003.Pdf
    General Disclaimer One or more of the Following Statements may affect this Document This document has been reproduced from the best copy furnished by the organizational source. It is being released in the interest of making available as much information as possible. This document may contain data, which exceeds the sheet parameters. It was furnished in this condition by the organizational source and is the best copy available. This document may contain tone-on-tone or color graphs, charts and/or pictures, which have been reproduced in black and white. This document is paginated as submitted by the original source. Portions of this document are not fully legible due to the historical nature of some of the material. However, it is the best reproduction available from the original submission. Produced by the NASA Center for Aerospace Information (CASI) X-625-71-308 PkEFRlil NASA T1:1 X- ELECTRON AND POSITIVE ION DENSITY ALTITUDE DISTRIBUTIONS IN THE EQUATORIAL Q REGION A. C. AIKIN R. A. GOLDBERG Y. V. SOMAYAJULU Aq ^F q "9,>/ #44#i4 a^F/j/F C-r; AI!riICT 1471 Jp ,32479 Ole °o (ACCESSi JN N MBCR) (THR 0 'i (NASA CR R TMX OR AD NUMBER) (CATEGORY) --- GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER GREENBELT, MARYLAND - it %0 ELECTRON AND POSITIVE ION DENSITY ALTITUDE DISTRIBUTIONS IN THE EQUATORIAL D REGION by A. C. Aikin R. A. Goldberg • Laboratory for .Planetary Atmospheres NASA/Goddard !7nace Flight Center Greenb?.. , Maryland and Y. V. Somayajulu National Physical Laboratory New Delhi, India ABSTRACT Three simultaneous rocket measurements of P region ionization sources and electron and ion densities have been made in one day.
    [Show full text]
  • Topic 5: Noise in Images
    NOISE IN IMAGES Session: 2007-2008 -1 Topic 5: Noise in Images 5.1 Introduction One of the most important consideration in digital processing of images is noise, in fact it is usually the factor that determines the success or failure of any of the enhancement or recon- struction scheme, most of which fail in the present of significant noise. In all processing systems we must consider how much of the detected signal can be regarded as true and how much is associated with random background events resulting from either the detection or transmission process. These random events are classified under the general topic of noise. This noise can result from a vast variety of sources, including the discrete nature of radiation, variation in detector sensitivity, photo-graphic grain effects, data transmission errors, properties of imaging systems such as air turbulence or water droplets and image quantsiation errors. In each case the properties of the noise are different, as are the image processing opera- tions that can be applied to reduce their effects. 5.2 Fixed Pattern Noise As image sensor consists of many detectors, the most obvious example being a CCD array which is a two-dimensional array of detectors, one per pixel of the detected image. If indi- vidual detector do not have identical response, then this fixed pattern detector response will be combined with the detected image. If this fixed pattern is purely additive, then the detected image is just, f (i; j) = s(i; j) + b(i; j) where s(i; j) is the true image and b(i; j) the fixed pattern noise.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Dharmendra Kumar Assistant Professor Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering MMM University of Technology, Gorakhpur–273010
    Dr. Dharmendra Kumar Assistant Professor Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering MMM University of Technology, Gorakhpur–273010. Content of Unit-3 Noise: Source of Noise, Frequency domain, Representation of noise, Linear Filtering of noise, Noise in Amplitude modulation system, Noise in SSB-SC,DSB and DSB-C, Noise Ratio, Noise Comparison of FM and AM, Pre- emphasis and De-emphasis, Figure of Merit. Claude E. Shannon conceptualized the communication theory model in the late 1940s. It remains central to communication study today. Noise is random signal that exists in communication systems Channel is the main source of noise in communication systems Transmitter or Receiver may also induce noise in the system There are mainly 2-types of noise sources Internal noise source (are mainly internal to the communication system) External noise source Noise is an inconvenient feature which affects the system performance. Following are the effects of noise Degrade system performance for both analog and digital systems Noise limits the operating range of the systems Noise indirectly places a limit on the weakest signal that can be amplified by an amplifier. The oscillator in the mixer circuit may limit its frequency because of noise. A system’s operation depends on the operation of its circuits. Noise limits the smallest signal that a receiver is capable of processing The receiver can not understand the sender the receiver can not function as it should be. Noise affects the sensitivity of receivers: Sensitivity is the minimum amount of input signal necessary to obtain the specified quality output. Noise affects the sensitivity of a receiver system, which eventually affects the output.
    [Show full text]
  • Soundproofing 101: a Presentation to the MCAC Environment and Health Subcommittee March 18, 2019 Content
    Soundproofing 101: A presentation to the MCAC Environment and Health Subcommittee March 18, 2019 Content • Overview of How Logan Works • Noise Abatement Program • Soundproofing Regulatory Context • Soundproofing Process • History of the Program and Current Status • Questions/Discussion 2 The FAA uses Logan runways in combinations to safely and efficiently meet demand. Depending on which sets of runways the FAA chooses different communities are overflown Northeast Flow Southwest Flow R 4R\L and 9 R22R\L and 27 Northwest Flow Southeast Flow R33L\32 and 27 R33L\32 and 27 3 Because of Logan’s urban location, Massport has developed a comprehensive noise abatement program for Logan Airport • Noise abatement departure • 24/7 noise complaint line 617-561- procedures 3333 • Late night runway preference • State of the art Noise Monitoring opposite direction operations System • Decibel restriction on R4L • Near live flight tracking on website departures and 22R arrivals • http://www.massport.com/environment/environmental_rep orting/Noise%20Abatement/overview.aspx • Unidirectional/wind restriction use R14/32 • Soundproofing Program for Homes and School • Engine run-up restrictions • Limited time • Specific locations • Towing requirements for certain aircraft repositioning • Encourage use of single engine taxiing and reverse thrust 4 Noise Contours for environmental analysis and soundproofing must be created by using the FAA’s Airport Environmental Data Tool (AEDT) Model • The AEDT is an FAA Model • Critical inputs include number of flights, aircraft
    [Show full text]