Treatment Strategies for Women with WHO Group II Anovulation: BMJ: First Published As 10.1136/Bmj.J138 on 31 January 2017

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Treatment Strategies for Women with WHO Group II Anovulation: BMJ: First Published As 10.1136/Bmj.J138 on 31 January 2017 RESEARCH OPEN ACCESS Treatment strategies for women with WHO group II anovulation: BMJ: first published as 10.1136/bmj.j138 on 31 January 2017. Downloaded from systematic review and network meta-analysis Rui Wang,1,2 Bobae V Kim,1 Madelon van Wely,3 Neil P Johnson,1,4 Michael F Costello,5 Hanwang Zhang,2 Ernest Hung Yu Ng,6 Richard S Legro,7 Siladitya Bhattacharya,8 Robert J Norman,1,9,10 Ben Willem J Mol1,11 For numbered affiliations see ABSTRACT 1.55, 1.02 to 2.36; respectively). Letrozole led to higher end of article. OBJECTIVE live birth rates when compared with clomiphene alone Correspondence to: R Wang, To compare the effectiveness of alternative first line (1.67, 1.11 to 2.49). Both letrozole and metformin led to University of Adelaide, North Adelaide, Australia, treatment options for women with WHO group II lower multiple pregnancy rates compared with [email protected] anovulation wishing to conceive. clomiphene alone (0.46, 0.23 to 0.92; 0.22, 0.05 to Cite this as: BMJ 2017;356:j138 DESIGN 0.92; respectively). http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j138 Systematic review and network meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS Accepted: 29 December 2016 DATA SOURCES In women with WHO group II anovulation, letrozole and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, the combination of clomiphene and metformin are and Embase, up to 11 April 2016. superior to clomiphene alone in terms of ovulation and pregnancy. Compared with clomiphene alone, STUDY SELECTION letrozole is the only treatment showing a significantly Randomised controlled trials comparing eight higher rate of live birth. ovulation induction treatments in women with WHO group II anovulation: clomiphene, letrozole, SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION metformin, clomiphene and metformin combined, PROSPERO CRD42015027579. tamoxifen, gonadotropins, laparoscopic ovarian drilling, and placebo or no treatment. Study quality Introduction was measured on the basis of the methodology and Infertility affects one in seven couples, and ovulation categories described in the Cochrane Collaboration disorders account for a quarter of all cases.1 Normogo- Handbook. Pregnancy, defined preferably as clinical nadotrophic anovulation, also classified as World http://www.bmj.com/ pregnancy, was the primary outcome; live birth, Health Organization group II anovulation, is the most ovulation, miscarriage, and multiple pregnancy were secondary outcomes. common category of anovulatory infertility. Within this group, polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is by far the RESULTS most prevalent cause.2 Of 2631 titles and abstracts initially identified, 57 trials PCOS was first described in 1935 by Stein and reporting on 8082 women were included. All Leventhal.3 Previously described in several different pharmacological treatments were superior to placebo ways, the diagnostic criteria for PCOS, agreed jointly on 23 September 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. or no intervention in terms of pregnancy and ovulation. by the European Society of Human Reproduction Compared with clomiphene alone, both letrozole and and Embryology and the American Society for Repro- the combination of clomiphene and metformin showed ductive Medicine, are known as the Rotterdam crite- higher pregnancy rates (odds ratio 1.58, 95% ria.4 5 These criteria are also endorsed by the confidence interval 1.25 to 2.00; 1.81, 1.35 to 2.42; 6 respectively) and ovulation rates (1.99, 1.38 to 2.87; Endocrine Society and are used by a wide range of medical professionals, and not just obstetricians and gynaecologists. The clinical manifestations of PCOS include oligomenorrhoea or amenorrhoea, hir- WHat IS ALREADY KNOWN ON THIS TOPIC sutism, and frequently infertility.7 From conception, Clomiphene is the longstanding first line treatment for WHO group II anovulation women with PCOS and their infants are at increased Existing pairwise meta-analyses are limited to comparisons of two treatments risk of perinatal complications, including gesta- tional diabetes, pre-eclampsia, preterm labour, and WHat THIS stUDY ADDS neonatal morbidity.8-10 This study compares all of the most common regimens of ovulation induction with Safe and effective ovulation induction is important each other, using direct and indirect means for women with WHO group II anovulation who wish to All pharmacological ovulation inductions were superior to placebo or no treatment conceive, to avoid premature exposure to in vitro fertil- in terms of ovulation and pregnancy in women with WHO group II anovulation isation, which is invasive, expensive, and associated Letrozole was the most effective treatment in terms of live birth, and one of the top with potentially higher chances of perinatal complica- 11-14 three treatments in terms of pregnancy and ovulation tions and congenital abnormalities. Several medical options are used to treat ovulation disorders and infer- Clomiphene and metformin combined was the most effective treatment in terms of tility, including oestrogen receptor modulators (such as pregnancy but not live birth; the potential higher chances of side effects should clomiphene and tamoxifen), aromatase inhibitors also be taken into account in decision making (such as letrozole), insulin sensitising drugs (such as Metformin and letrozole were associated with the lowest rates of multiple pregnancy metformin), and direct hormonal stimulation of the the bmj | BMJ 2017;356:j138 | doi: 10.1136/bmj.j138 1 RESEARCH ovaries (gonadotropins), with laparoscopic ovarian only compared different doses of the same treatment BMJ: first published as 10.1136/bmj.j138 on 31 January 2017. Downloaded from drilling being a surgical alternative. option or compared the effects of adding medical Traditional pairwise meta-analysis only allows adjuncts such as dexamethasone. Authors were con- the comparison of two interventions for ovulation tacted for further information if necessary. induction.15-20 However, many of these treatment strat- egies have not been compared directly in previous ran- Patient involvement domised controlled trials. Therefore, it is difficult to There was no patient involvement in framing the identify the most effective treatment based on direct research question, choosing the outcome measures, or evidence. Network meta-analysis, also known as multi- conducting the research. We plan to involve Fertility ple treatment comparison meta-analysis, compares Network UK, PCOS Challenge, RESOLVE, and Access multiple treatments in one statistical model,21-23 and Australia's National Infertility Network in the dissemi- provides a hierarchy of effectiveness of these treatments nation of the research results by means of short, easy to that can guide decision making.24 25 The application of read summaries of key results, infographics, and audio network meta-analysis is crucial in areas where multi- or video interviews that can be used by patients and ple interventions are available, such as in WHO group II caregivers. anovulation. We therefore performed a systematic review and net- Data extraction and assessment of risk of bias work meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness of dif- Two reviewers (RW and BVK) independently assessed ferent treatment options, including clomiphene, the eligibility of all identified citations, and extracted letrozole, metformin, clomiphene and metformin com- data from original trial reports using a specifically bined, tamoxifen, gonadotropins, laparoscopic ovarian designed form that captured information on study drilling, and placebo or no treatment, in women with design, trial setting, patient characteristics (inclusion WHO group II anovulation, and to identify the best criteria, age, body mass index, duration of infertility, strategy for first line treatment. history of ovulation induction), sample sizes, details of ovulation induction options, and outcomes. Disagree- Methods ments were referred to a third reviewer (BWJM) to reach Search strategy and selection criteria consensus. We conducted and reported the study according to the We chose pregnancy, defined preferably as clinical preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and pregnancy, as the primary outcome. Clinical pregnancy meta-analyses (PRISMA) extension statement for net- was defined as pregnancy diagnosed by ultrasono- http://www.bmj.com/ work meta-analyses.26 We performed an extensive elec- graphic visualisation of one or more gestational tronic search of the Cochrane Central Register of sacs.27 28 Comparing the effectiveness of a treatment Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Medline, and Embase for based on either clinical pregnancy or live birth rate as randomised controlled trials. The search strategies endpoints often results in comparable conclusions.29 were based on combinations of ovulation induction and Therefore, we used data on live birth or pregnancy (pos- anovulation (or PCOS), using both free words and index itive blood or urine test for human chorionic gonadotro- terms (appendix 1). We sought further trial details or pin) as an outcome when data on clinical pregnancy on 23 September 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. protocols to establish eligibility of potential trials. We were not available. Secondary outcomes were live birth, also searched previous published Cochrane systematic ovulation, miscarriage, and multiple pregnancy. reviews on ovulation induction for additional studies. Study quality was assigned by two reviewers (RW and No language restrictions were applied. Our latest search BVK) using the methodology and categories described was completed on 11 April 2016. in the
Recommended publications
  • Prospective Study on Gynaecological Effects of Two Antioestrogens Tamoxifen and Toremifene in Postmenopausal Women
    British Journal of Cancer (2001) 84(7), 897–902 © 2001 Cancer Research Campaign doi: 10.1054/ bjoc.2001.1703, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on http://www.bjcancer.com Prospective study on gynaecological effects of two antioestrogens tamoxifen and toremifene in postmenopausal women MB Marttunen1, B Cacciatore1, P Hietanen2, S Pyrhönen2, A Tiitinen1, T Wahlström3 and O Ylikorkala1 1Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, P.O. Box 140, FIN-00029 HYKS, Finland; 2Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, P.O. Box 180, FIN-00029 HYKS, Finland; 3Department of Pathology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, P.O. Box 140, FIN-00029 HYKS, Finland Summary To assess and compare the gynaecological consequences of the use of 2 antioestrogens we examined 167 postmenopausal breast cancer patients before and during the use of either tamoxifen (20 mg/day, n = 84) or toremifene (40 mg/day, n = 83) as an adjuvant treatment of stage II–III breast cancer. Detailed interview concerning menopausal symptoms, pelvic examination including transvaginal sonography (TVS) and collection of endometrial sample were performed at baseline and at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months of treatment. In a subgroup of 30 women (15 using tamoxifen and 15 toremifene) pulsatility index (PI) in an uterine artery was measured before and at 6 and 12 months of treatment. The mean (±SD) follow-up time was 2.3 ± 0.8 years. 35% of the patients complained of vasomotor symptoms before the start of the trial. This rate increased to 60.0% during the first year of the trial, being similar among patients using tamoxifen (57.1%) and toremifene (62.7%).
    [Show full text]
  • Clomifene Citrate(BANM, Rinnm) ⊗
    2086 Sex Hormones and their Modulators Profasi; UK: Choragon; Ovitrelle; Pregnyl; USA: Chorex†; Choron; Gonic; who received the drug for a shorter period.6 No association be- 8. Werler MM, et al. Ovulation induction and risk of neural tube Novarel; Ovidrel; Pregnyl; Profasi; Venez.: Ovidrel; Pregnyl; Profasi†. tween gonadotrophin therapy and ovarian cancer was noted in defects. Lancet 1994; 344: 445–6. Multi-ingredient: Ger.: NeyNormin N (Revitorgan-Dilutionen N Nr this study. The conclusions of this study were only tentative, 9. Greenland S, Ackerman DL. Clomiphene citrate and neural tube 65)†; Mex.: Gonakor. defects: a pooled analysis of controlled epidemiologic studies since the numbers who developed ovarian cancer were small; it and recommendations for future studies. Fertil Steril 1995; 64: has been pointed out that a successfully achieved pregnancy may 936–41. reduce the risk of some other cancers, and that the risks and ben- 10. Whiteman D, et al. Reproductive factors, subfertility, and risk efits of the procedure are not easy to balance.7 A review8 of epi- of neural tube defects: a case-control study based on the Oxford Clomifene Citrate (BANM, rINNM) ⊗ Record Linkage Study Register. Am J Epidemiol 2000; 152: demiological and cohort studies concluded that clomifene was 823–8. Chloramiphene Citrate; Citrato de clomifeno; Clomifène, citrate not associated with any increase in the risk of ovarian cancer 11. Sørensen HT, et al. Use of clomifene during early pregnancy de; Clomifeni citras; Clomiphene Citrate (USAN); Klomifeenisi- when used for less than 12 cycles, but noted conflicting results, and risk of hypospadias: population based case-control study.
    [Show full text]
  • Tamoxifen, Raloxifene Upheld for Prevention
    38 WOMEN’S HEALTH MAY 1, 2010 • FAMILY PRACTICE NEWS Tamoxifen, Raloxifene Upheld for Prevention BY KERRI WACHTER 9,736 on tamoxifen and 9,754 on ralox- 1.24, which was significant (P = .01). Both events) did not appear to be as effective ifene. The differences in numbers are due drugs reduced the risk of invasive breast as tamoxifen (57 events) in preventing WASHINGTON — Tamoxifen and to a combination of loss during follow- cancer by roughly 50% in the original re- noninvasive breast cancer (P = .052). raloxifene offer women at high risk of up or follow-up data becoming available port (median follow-up 47 months). “Now with additional follow-up, those developing breast cancer two effective for women who were lost to follow-up “We have estimated, however, that differences have narrowed,” he said. At options to prevent the disease, based on in the original report. Women on ta- this difference in the raloxifene-treated 8 years, there was no statistical signifi- 8 years of follow-up data for more than moxifen received 20 mg/day and those group represents 76% of tamoxifen’s cance between the two groups with a 19,000 women in the STAR trial. on raloxifene received 60 mg/day. chemopreventative benefit, which trans- risk ratio of 1.22 (P = .12). The relative While tamoxifen proved significantly At an average follow-up of 8 years, the lates into at 38% reduction in invasive risk of 1.22 favors tamoxifen, but ralox- more effective in preventing invasive breast relative risk of invasive breast cancer on breast cancers,” Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Clomid (Clomiphene Citrate USP)
    PRODUCT MONOGRAPH PrCLOMID® (clomiphene citrate USP) 50 mg Tablets Ovulatory Agent sanofi-aventis Canada Inc. Date of Revision: 2905 Place Louis-R.-Renaud August 9, 2013 Laval, Quebec H7V 0A3 Submission Control No.: 165671 s-a Version 5.0 dated August 9, 2013 Page 1 of 23 PRODUCT MONOGRAPH PrCLOMID® (clomiphene citrate USP) 50 mg Tablets Ovulatory agent. ACTION AND CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY CLOMID (clomiphene citrate) is an orally-administered, non-steroidal agent which may induce ovulation in anovulatory women in appropriately selected cases.1-16 The ovulatory response to cyclic CLOMID therapy appears to be mediated through increased output of pituitary gonadotropins, which in turn stimulate the maturation and endocrine activity of the ovarian follicle and the subsequent development and function of the corpus luteum. The role of the pituitary is indicated by increased plasma levels of gonadotropins and by the response of the ovary, as manifested by increased plasma level of estradiol. Antagonism of competitive inhibition of endogenous estrogen may play a role in the action of CLOMID on the hypothalamus. CLOMID is a drug of considerable pharmacologic potency. Its administration should be preceded by careful evaluation and selection of the patient, and must be accompanied by close attention to the timing of the dose. With conservative selection and management of the patient, CLOMID has been demonstrated to be a useful therapy for the anovulatory patient. Based on studies with 14C-labeled clomiphene, the drug is readily absorbed orally in humans, and is excreted principally in the feces. Cumulative excretion of the 14C-label averaged 51% of the oral dose after 5 days in 6 subjects, with mean urinary excretion of 8% and mean fecal excretion of 42%; less than 1% per day was excreted in fecal and urine samples collected from 31 to 53 days after 14C-labelled clomiphene administration.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Biologically Active Metabolites of Tamoxifen on the Proliferation Kinetics of MCF-7 Human Breast Cancer Cells in Vitro
    [CANCER RESEARCH 43, 4618-4624, October 1983] Effects of Biologically Active Metabolites of Tamoxifen on the Proliferation Kinetics of MCF-7 Human Breast Cancer Cells in Vitro Roger R. Reddel, Leigh C. Murphy, and Robert L. Sutherland1 Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research (Sydney Branch), University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia ABSTRACT tumor tissues of patients treated with tamoxifen is DMT, with 4OHT being present at much lower concentrations (1, 7,13, 25). The effects of two major metabolites of tamoxifen, /V-de- Prompted no doubt in part by the early misidentification of the methyltamoxifen (DMT) and 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4OHT), on major metabolite as 4OHT, there has been considerable interest MCF-7 Å“il proliferation and cell cycle kinetic parameters were in the antiestrogenic and antitumor activity of 4OHT (2, 3, 6,15, compared with those of the parent compound. All three com 16, 33). In contrast, there have been very few studies on the pounds produced dose-dependent decreases in the rate of cell biological activity of DMT (6, 33). proliferation which were accompanied by decreases in the per In the present study, we have attempted to answer the follow centage of S- and G2-M-phase cells. 4OHT was 100- to 167-fold ing questions. Do the metabolites DMT and 40HT differ from more potent than both tamoxifen and DMT in producing these tamoxifen in their actions on the proliferation and cell cycle effects, and this was correlated with their relative binding affini kinetics of human breast cancer cells? What are the relative ties (RBAs) for the cytoplasmic estrogen receptor (ER) (17/3- potencies of these 3 compounds in their actions on such cells in estradiol = 100, 4OHT = 41, tamoxifen = DMT = 2).
    [Show full text]
  • Management of Women with Clomifene Citrate Resistant Polycystic Ovary Syndrome – an Evidence Based Approach
    1 Management of Women with Clomifene Citrate Resistant Polycystic Ovary Syndrome – An Evidence Based Approach Hatem Abu Hashim Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt 1. Introduction World Health Organisation (WHO) type II anovulation is defined as normogonadotrophic normoestrogenic anovulation and occurs in approximately 85% of anovulatory patients. Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common form of WHO type II anovulatory infertility and is associated with hyperandrogenemia (1,2). Moreover, PCOS is the most common endocrine abnormality in reproductive age women. The prevalence of PCOS is traditionally estimated at 4% to 8% from studies performed in Greece, Spain and the USA (3-6). The prevalence of PCOS has increased with the use of different diagnostic criteria and has recently been shown to be 11.9 ± 2.4% -17.8 ± 2.8 in the first community-based prevalence study based on the current Rotterdam diagnostic criteria compared with 10.2 ± 2.2% -12.0 ± 2.4% and 8.7 ± 2.0% using National Institutes of Health criteria and Androgen Excess Society recommendations respectively (7). Importantly, 70% of women in this recent study were undiagnosed (7). Clomiphene citrate (CC) is still holding its place as the first-line therapy for ovulation induction in these patients (2,8,9). CC contains an unequal mixture of two isomers as their citrate salts, enclomiphene and zuclomiphene. Zuclomiphene is much the more potent of the two for induction of ovulation, accounts for 38% of the total drug content of one tablet and has a much longer half-life than enclomiphene, being detectable in plasma 1 month following its administration (10).
    [Show full text]
  • Clomifene Or Letrozole Ovulation Induction Treatment
    What happens next? For most women (once the correct dose has been established) we would encourage you to continue for six months without having to be scanned. After this, if you are still not pregnant, please ring your Fertility Nurse for advice. If, during the time you are receiving treatment, your periods become irregular ie. longer than 33-34 days, or you lose over a stone in weight (gaining is not an option!), please contact your Fertility Nurse. Clomifene or Letrozole Good Luck (Please call if you are pregnant!) Ovulation Induction Cornwall Centre for Reproductive Medicine treatment Wheal Unity Clinic Administrator – 01872 253044 Fertility Nurses – 01872 252061 If you would like this leaflet in large print, braille, audio version or in another language, please contact the General Office on 01872 252690 RCHT 557 © RCHT Design & Publications 2002 Revised 12/2018 V3 Review due 12/2021 What is clomifene? There is also a theoretical, but not proven, concern that prolonged use may Clomifene citrate or Letrozole are the most commonly used drug in the make the development of ovarian cancer more likely. Therefore it is treatment of women who fail to ovulate (produce an egg) regularly. Clomifene recommended to be taken for a year only, taking it for any longer is unlikely to or Letrozole drugs have the effect of boosting the production of those give any significant benefit. hormones that stimulate eggs to grow. When and how is it taken? Does it work for everyone? Take clomifene/letrozole for four days starting the day after your period starts Over half of women will respond to clomifene/letrozole treatment (more so if (ie.
    [Show full text]
  • 6. Endocrine System 6.1 - Drugs Used in Diabetes Also See SIGN 116: Management of Diabetes, 2010
    1 6. Endocrine System 6.1 - Drugs used in Diabetes Also see SIGN 116: Management of Diabetes, 2010 http://www.sign.ac.uk/guidelines/fulltext/116 Insulin Prescribing Guidance in Type 2 Diabetes http://www.fifeadtc.scot.nhs.uk/media/6978/insulin-prescribing-in-type-2-diabetes.pdf 6.1.1 Insulins (Type 2 Diabetes) 6.1.1.1 Short Acting Insulins 1st Choice S – Insuman ® Rapid (Human Insulin) S – Humulin S ® S – Actrapid ® 2nd Choice S – Insulin Aspart (NovoRapid ®) (Insulin Analogues) S – Insulin Lispro (Humalog ®) 6.1.1.2 Intermediate and Long Acting Insulins 1st Choice S – Isophane Insulin (Insuman Basal ®) (Human Insulin) S – Isophane Insulin (Humulin I ®) S – Isophane Insulin (Insulatard ®) 2nd Choice S – Insulin Detemir (Levemir ®) (Insulin Analogues) S – Insulin Glargine (Lantus ®) Biphasic Insulins 1st Choice S – Biphasic Isophane (Human Insulin) (Insuman Comb ® ‘15’, ‘25’,’50’) S – Biphasic Isophane (Humulin M3 ®) 2nd Choice S – Biphasic Aspart (Novomix ® 30) (Insulin Analogues) S – Biphasic Lispro (Humalog ® Mix ‘25’ or ‘50’) Prescribing Points For patients with Type 1 diabetes, insulin will be initiated by a diabetes specialist with continuation of prescribing in primary care. Insulin analogues are the preferred insulins for use in Type 1 diabetes. Cartridge formulations of insulin are preferred to alternative formulations Type 2 patients who are newly prescribed insulin should usually be started on NPH isophane insulin, (e.g. Insuman Basal ®, Humulin I ®, Insulatard ®). Long-acting recombinant human insulin analogues (e.g. Levemir ®, Lantus ®) offer no significant clinical advantage for most type 2 patients and are much more expensive. In terms of human insulin. The Insuman ® range is currently the most cost-effective and preferred in new patients.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemotherapy Regimen: Tamoxifen
    Tamoxifen Chemotherapy Teaching The Center for Breast Cancer Mass General Cancer Center Center for Breast Cancer Topics to Discuss: • How Tamoxifen works • How Tamoxifen is taken • Storage, Handling, and Disposal • Drug Interactions • Side Effects & How to Manage • Supportive Care Resources • Your Breast Cancer Team • When to Call • Important Phone Numbers 2 What is TAMOXIFEN? • TAMOXIFEN (Nolvadex®) is an oral hormonal therapy used for hormone-sensitive breast cancers. • It works by blocking estrogen from binding to hormone receptors. This: • decreases the chance of breast cancer returning (recurrence) • decreases tumor size • delays tumors from spreading (progression) • Your care team will talk with you about how long you will need to take this therapy. – It is common to be on therapy for 5-10 years. 3 How is it taken? • TAMOXIFEN is a tablet you take by mouth. • Take one tablet (20 mg) once daily with or without food at the same time each day. – Do not take with grapefruit juice. • Swallow tablet whole with water. Do not break, chew, or crush your tablet. • If you miss a dose, skip the dose. Do not take 2 doses at the same time to make up for the missed dose. 4 Storing and Handling • Keep TAMOXIFEN in its original bottle or in a separate pill box – do not mix other medicines into the same pill box. • Store at room temperature in a dry location away from direct light. • Keep out of reach from children and pets. • Wash your hands before and after handling. – If someone else will be handling your TAMOXIFEN, have them wear gloves so they do not come into direct contact with the medicine.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Tamoxifen Or Anastrozole on Steroid Sulfatase Activity and Serum Androgen Concentrations in Postmenopausal Women with Breast Cancer
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH 31: 1367-1372 (2011) Effect of Tamoxifen or Anastrozole on Steroid Sulfatase Activity and Serum Androgen Concentrations in Postmenopausal Women with Breast Cancer S.J. STANWAY1, C. PALMIERI2, F.Z. STANCZYK3, E.J. FOLKERD4, M. DOWSETT4, R. WARD2, R.C. COOMBES2, M.J. REED1† and A. PUROHIT1 1Oncology Drug Discovery Group, Section of Investigative Medicine, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London W12 0NN, U.K.; 2Cancer Research UK Laboratories, Department of Oncology, Hammersmith Hospital, London W12 0NN, U.K.; 3Reproductive Endocrine Research Laboratory, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Los Angeles, CA, U.S.A.; 4Department of Biochemistry, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, SW3 6JJ, U.K. Abstract. Background: In postmenopausal women sulfate and dehydroepiandrosterone levels. Results: Neither estrogens can be formed by the aromatase pathway, which anastrozole nor tamoxifen had any significant effect on STS gives rise to estrone, and the steroid sulfatase (STS) route activity as measured in PBLs. Anastrozole did not affect which can result in the formation of estrogens and serum androstenediol concentrations. Conclusion: androstenediol, a steroid with potent estrogenic properties. Anastrozole and tamoxifen did not inhibit STS activity and Aromatase inhibitors, such as anastrozole, are now in serum androstenediol concentrations were not reduced by clinical use whereas STS inhibitors, such as STX64, are still aromatase inhibition. As androstenediol has estrogenic undergoing clinical evaluation. STX64 was recently shown properties, it is possible that the combination of an to block STS activity and reduce serum androstenediol aromatase inhibitor and STS inhibitor may give a therapeutic concentrations in postmenopausal women with breast cancer.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison Between Two Methods of Ovulation Induction: Clomiphene Alone and Clomiphene +Tamoxifen in PCOS Patients
    Iranian Journal of Reproductive Medicine Vol. 2. No.2 pp:74-77, 2004 Comparison between Two Methods of Ovulation Induction: Clomiphene alone and Clomiphene +Tamoxifen in PCOS Patients Mohammad Ghafourzadeh, M.D.1, Mojgan Karimi M.D.2, Mohammad Ali Karimazadeh, M.D. 3, and Mahshid Bokai,B.S. 4 1,2,3,4 Shahid Sadoughi Univerisity of Medical Sciences and Health Services of Yazd, Iran. Background: Infertility affects about 10-15% of reproductive-age couples. About half the causes of infertility are female related and approximately 40% of the cases are caused by anovulation, mostly in PCO women. Objective: This study was conducted to determine and compare the effects of two drug treatment regimens: higher dose of clomiphene and a combination of lower dose of clomiphene and tamoxifen in treating infertile women with PCO. Materials and Methods: The study was a randomized clinical trial conducted on 100 infertile patients who referred to Yazd-Iran Infertility Clinic between the years 2001-2003. The patients were selected who had received at least 3 periods of clomiphene, but no pregnancy had occurred. They were randomly divided into two groups. In the first group, clomiphene was increased to 100 mg and the second group 20 mg of tamoxifen was added to 50 mg of clomiphene from day 5-9 of menstruation cycle. Infertility duration, duration of medicine used, PCT score, endometrial thickness, ovulation, and pregnancy rate were studied in both groups. Results: Ovulation rate in clomiphene group was 54.9%; Tamoxifen + clomiphene group was 73.5% without significant differences in both groups. (PV = 0.053).
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Methods
    1 Supplementary Methods Definitions of the reproductive traits used in the analysis Reproductive trait Definition Age at first birth (years) Age at first live birth (females only). Age at last birth (years) Age at last live birth (females only). Age at menarche (years) Age at menarche between 9 and 17 years. Age at natural menopause (years) Age at last menstrual period excluding those with surgical menopause or taking hormone replacement therapy. Bilateral oophorectomy Ever had bilateral oophorectomy (case) vs. never (control). Breast cancer Breast cancer on registry (ICD10 C50, ICD9 174&175), vs no cancer reported (control). Dysmenorrhea Dysmenorrhea listed as an illness (reported at interview). Early menarche Youngest 5% of BMI adjusted age at menarche(case) vs oldest 5% (control). Age at menarche defined as above. Early menopause Age at natural menopause (as defined above) at 20-45 years (case) vs. 50-60 years (control). Endometrial cancer Endometrial cancer on registry (ICD10 C54, ICD9 182) vs no cancer reported. Endometriosis Endometriosis listed as an illness (reported at interview). Fibroids Fibroids listed as an illness (reported at interview). Hysterectomy Ever had hysterectomy (case) vs. never (control). Irregular menstrual cycles Women still menstruating reporting irregular cycles (case) vs. regular cycles (control). Length of menstrual cycle (days) Women still menstruating reporting regular cycles. Excludes women taking oral contraceptives, HRT or hormone medications (see list below) and pregnant women. Long menstrual cycle (vs average) Length of menstrual cycle >31 days (case) vs 28 days (control). As defined above. Menopausal symptoms Menopausal symptoms listed as an illness (reported at interview). Menorrhagia Menorrhagia listed as an illness (reported at interview).
    [Show full text]