Variation in Seed Maturation in Myrica Esculenta of West Himalaya
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Caterpillars Moths Butterflies Woodies
NATIVE Caterpillars Moths and utter flies Band host NATIVE Hackberry Emperor oodies PHOTO : Megan McCarty W Double-toothed Prominent Honey locust Moth caterpillar Hackberry Emperor larva PHOTO : Douglas Tallamy Big Poplar Sphinx Number of species of Caterpillars n a study published in 2009, Dr. Oaks (Quercus) 557 Beeches (Fagus) 127 Honey-locusts (Gleditsia) 46 Magnolias (Magnolia) 21 Double-toothed Prominent ( Nerice IDouglas W. Tallamy, Ph.D, chair of the Cherries (Prunus) 456 Serviceberry (Amelanchier) 124 New Jersey Tea (Ceanothus) 45 Buttonbush (Cephalanthus) 19 bidentata ) larvae feed exclusively on elms Department of Entomology and Wildlife Willows (Salix) 455 Larches or Tamaracks (Larix) 121 Sycamores (Platanus) 45 Redbuds (Cercis) 19 (Ulmus), and can be found June through Ecology at the University of Delaware Birches (Betula) 411 Dogwoods (Cornus) 118 Huckleberry (Gaylussacia) 44 Green-briar (Smilax) 19 October. Their body shape mimics the specifically addressed the usefulness of Poplars (Populus) 367 Firs (Abies) 117 Hackberry (Celtis) 43 Wisterias (Wisteria) 19 toothed shape of American elm, making native woodies as host plants for our Crabapples (Malus) 308 Bayberries (Myrica) 108 Junipers (Juniperus) 42 Redbay (native) (Persea) 18 them hard to spot. The adult moth is native caterpillars (and obviously Maples (Acer) 297 Viburnums (Viburnum) 104 Elders (Sambucus) 42 Bearberry (Arctostaphylos) 17 small with a wingspan of 3-4 cm. therefore moths and butterflies). Blueberries (Vaccinium) 294 Currants (Ribes) 99 Ninebark (Physocarpus) 41 Bald cypresses (Taxodium) 16 We present here a partial list, and the Alders (Alnus) 255 Hop Hornbeam (Ostrya) 94 Lilacs (Syringa) 40 Leatherleaf (Chamaedaphne) 15 Honey locust caterpillar feeds on honey number of Lepidopteran species that rely Hickories (Carya) 235 Hemlocks (Tsuga) 92 Hollies (Ilex) 39 Poison Ivy (Toxicodendron) 15 locust, and Kentucky coffee trees. -
Invasive Trees of Georgia Pub10-14
Pub. No. 39 October 2016 Invasive Trees of Georgia by Dr. Kim D. Coder, Professor of Tree Biology & Health Care Warnell School of Forestry & Natural Resources, University of Georgia Georgia has many species of trees. Some are native trees and some have been introduced from outside the state, nation, or continent. Most of Georgia’s trees are well- behaved and easily develop into sustainable shade and street trees. A few tree species have an extrodinary ability to upsurp resources and take over sites from other plants. These trees are called invasive because they effectively invade sites, many times eliminat- ing other species of plants. There are a few tree species native to Georgia which are considered invasive in other parts of the country. These native invasives, may be well-behaved in Georgia, but reproduce and take over sites elsewhere, and so have gained an invasive status from at least one other invasive species list. Table 1. There are hundreds of trees which have been introduced to Georgia landscapes. Some of these exotic / naturalized trees are considered invasive. The selected list of Georgia invasive trees listed here are notorious for growing rampantly and being difficult to eradicate. Table 2. Table 1: Native trees considered invasive in other parts of the country. scientific name common name scientific name common name Acacia farnesiana sweet acacia Myrica cerifera Southern bayberry Acer negundo boxelder Pinus taeda loblolly pine Acer rubrum red maple Populus deltoides Eastern cottonwood Fraxinus americana white ash Prunus serotina black cherry Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash Robinia pseudoacacia black locust Gleditsia triacanthos honeylocust Toxicodendron vernix poison sumac Juniperus virginiana eastern redcedar The University of Georgia is committed to principles of equal opportunity and affirmative action. -
Ethnoveterinary Plants of Uttaranchal — a Review
Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge Vol. 6(3), July 2007, pp. 444-458 Ethnoveterinary plants of Uttaranchal — A review PC Pande1*, Lalit Tiwari1 & HC Pande2 1Department of Botany, Kumaon University, SSJ Campus, Almora 263 601, Uttaranchal 2Botanical Survey of India (NC), Dehradun, Uttaranchal E-mail: [email protected] Received 21 December 2004; revised 7 February 2007 The study reveals that the people of the Uttaranchal state use 364 plants species in ethnoveterinary practices. Bhotiyas, Boxas, Tharus, Jaunsaris and Rhajis are the tribal groups inhabiting in Uttaranchal. Analysis of data indicates that information on 163 plants is significant as it provides some new information of the ethnoveterinary uses. The study is expected to provide basic data for further studies aimed at conservation of traditional medicine and economic welfare of rural people at the study area. Keywords: Ethnoveterinary practices, Medicinal plants, Uttaranchal, Review IPC Int. Cl.8: A61K36/00, A61P1/00, A61P1/02, A61P1/04, A61P1/10, A61P1/16, A61P17/00, A61P19/00, A61P25/00, A61P27/00, A61P39/02 Uttaranchal state lies between 28°42′ to 31°28′N; medicinal knowledge of the state. Keeping this in 77°35′ to 81°05′E and comprise of 13 districts of the view, an attempt has been made to explore and Central Himalayas. The major part of this region is compile the exhaustive knowledge of plants used in mountainous. The region covers about 38,000 sq km veterinary practices. In all, 364 plant species were and comprises of 3 border districts, namely recorded from the Uttaranchal, which are used by the Pithoragarh, Chamoli and Uttarkashi; 7 inner districts: people for various veterinary diseases and disorders. -
Georgia Native Trees Considered Invasive in Other Parts of the Country. Scientific Name Common Name Scientific Name Common Name
Invasive Trees of Georgia Dr. Kim D. Coder, Professor of Tree Biology & Health Care, Warnell School, UGA Georgia has many species of trees. Some are native trees and some have been introduced from outside the state, nation, or continent. Most of Georgia’s trees are well-behaved and easily develop into sustainable shade and street trees. A few tree species have an extrodinary ability to upsurp resources and take over sites from other plants. These trees are called invasive because they effectively invade sites, many times eliminating other species of plants. There are a few tree species native to Georgia which are considered invasive in other parts of the country. These native invasives, may be well-behaved in Georgia, but reproduce and take over sites elsewhere, and so have gained an invasive status from at least one other invasive species list. Table 1. There are hundreds of trees which have been introduced to Georgia landscapes. Some of these exotic / naturalized trees are considered invasive. The selected list of Georgia invasive trees listed here are notorious for growing rampantly and being diffi- cult to eradicate. Table 2. They should not be planted. Table 1: Georgia native trees considered invasive in other parts of the country. scientific name common name scientific name common name Acacia farnesiana sweet acacia Myrica cerifera Southern bayberry Acer negundo boxelder Pinus taeda loblolly pine Acer rubrum red maple Populus deltoides Eastern Fraxinus americana white ash cottonwood Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash Prunus serotina black cherry Gleditsia triacanthos honeylocust Robinia pseudoacacia black locust Juniperus virginiana eastern Toxicodendron vernix poison sumac redcedar Table 2: Introduced (exotic) tree / shrub species found in Georgia listed at a regional / national level as being ecologically invasive. -
Antimicrobial Properties of Traditional Brewing Herbs
ANTIMICROBIAL PROPERTIES OF TRADITIONAL BREWING HERBS - Ledum palustre, Myrica gale & Humulus lupulus Gordon Virgo Project work in Ethnobiology 15 hp, 2010 Evolutionary Biology Centre (EBC) Supervisor: Hugo J. de Boer ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my supervisor Hugo de Boer for encouragement and his excellent input to this project. Thanks to Stallhagen Brewery and Marcus Lindborg for providing material and literature. Also, I would like to thank Stefan Roos at SLU and Marianne Svarvare for guidance and technique. ABSTRACT In this study, three different brewing herbs that have been used through the history are evaluated as inhibitors of common beer spoilage organisms. The three species are Ledum palustre (Marsh Tea), Myrica gale (Bog Myrtle) and Humulus lupulus (Hops). Experimental batches of 10 L were made with all the three herbs and one without any additives. For each herb, two batches were made with different concentration, one batch with 3g/L and the other with 6g/L. All batches were treated the same and fermentation pattern for all of them were similar. Inoculations of four common beer spoilage organisms were practiced in order to examine microbial resistance of the different beers. Antibacterial activity was analyzed by membrane filtration and by measure the optical density during the incubation time. Both Humulus lupulus and Myrica gale showed clear resistance to the three gram-positive bacteria. 1 INTRODUCTION Throughout history, several different plant species have been used as beer additives for flavour and above all as preservatives. Particularly two species, Myrica gale and Humulus lupulus were widely used as beer additives in Europe (Behre 1999). -
Seed Dispersal and Propagation of Three Myrica Species
Of Birds and Bayberries : Alfred j. Fordham Seed Dispersal and Propagation of Three Myrica Species The genus Myrica comprises about 50 tral United States and from Europe to north- species (often ill-defined) distributed east Asia. throughout the temperate and subtropical All three of these species have nitrogen- areas of both hemispheres. The Arnold Ar- fixing root nodules, which enable them to boretum collection includes three species: thrive m areas where many other plants M. pensylvanica, M. cerifera, andM. gale. could not survive. They are dioecious - Myrica pensylvanica Lois., the common having staminate (male) and pistillate (fe- bayberry or candleberry, occurs naturally male) flowers on different plants - like hol- from Newfoundland to western New York lies and ashes. and Maryland, chiefly in poor soil. It is suck- The fruits of Myrica pensylvanica and M. ering in habit and tends to form shrubby cerifera are small (2.5-3 mm and 3.5~.5 mm clumps, which at maturity can range from 2 in diameter respectively) globose nuts with to 8 feet in height. Frequently it is found on waxlike coatings. It is this waxlike material roadside cuts, railroad banks, gravel pits, and that provides the fragrance in bayberry- other locations where topsoil has been re- scented candles and soap. It becomes bluish moved completely. In Boston its shiny green gray as it dries, making the thickly clustered leaves remain on the branches until No- fruits conspicuous in the landscape. The vember. They are fragrant when crushed, a fruits ripen in late September and are eaten characteristic of all Myrica species. -
Myrica Cerifera Southern Waxmyrtle1 Edward F
Fact Sheet ST-410 October 1994 Myrica cerifera Southern Waxmyrtle1 Edward F. Gilman and Dennis G. Watson2 INTRODUCTION Multiple, twisted trunks with smooth, light grey bark, aromatic, olive green leaves, and clusters of grey-blue, waxy berries on female plants which are attractive to wildlife are just some of the reasons Southern Waxmyrtle is such a popular landscape plant (Fig. 1). Most specimens form a multi-stemmed, open, rounded canopy of weak trunks and branches. This rapidly-growing, small, evergreen native tree is capable of reaching a height of 25 feet with an equal spread but is usually seen in the 10 to 20-foot range. Sometimes used as a large shrubbery screen, Southern Waxmyrtle is ideal for use as a small tree, the lower limbs removed to reveal its picturesque form. One, or several clustered together, provide pleasing dappled shade for terraces or patios. Figure 1. Middle-aged Southern Waxmyrtle. GENERAL INFORMATION standard; small parking lot islands (< 100 square feet Scientific name: Myrica cerifera in size); narrow tree lawns (3-4 feet wide); specimen; Pronunciation: MEER-ih-kuh ser-IF-er-uh sidewalk cutout (tree pit); residential street tree; no Common name(s): Southern Waxmyrtle, Southern proven urban tolerance Bayberry Availability: generally available in many areas within Family: Myricaceae its hardiness range USDA hardiness zones: 7B through 11 (Fig. 2) Origin: native to North America DESCRIPTION Uses: Bonsai; container or above-ground planter; hedge; large parking lot islands (> 200 square feet in Height: 15 to 25 feet size); wide tree lawns (>6 feet wide); medium-sized Spread: 20 to 25 feet parking lot islands (100-200 square feet in size); Crown uniformity: irregular outline or silhouette medium-sized tree lawns (4-6 feet wide); Crown shape: round; vase shape recommended for buffer strips around parking lots or Crown density: moderate for median strip plantings in the highway; near a deck Growth rate: fast or patio; reclamation plant; screen; trainable as a 1. -
India L M S Palni, Director, GBPIHED
Lead Coordinator - India L M S Palni, Director, GBPIHED Nodal Person(s) – India R S Rawal, Scientist, GBPIHED Wildlife Institute of India (WII) G S Rawat, Scientist Uttarakhand Forest Department (UKFD) Nishant Verma, IFS Manoj Chandran, IFS Investigators GBPIHED Resource Persons K Kumar D S Rawat GBPIHED Ravindra Joshi S Sharma Balwant Rawat S C R Vishvakarma Lalit Giri G C S Negi Arun Jugran I D Bhatt Sandeep Rawat A K Sahani Lavkush Patel K Chandra Sekar Rajesh Joshi WII S Airi Amit Kotia Gajendra Singh Ishwari Rai WII Merwyn Fernandes B S Adhikari Pankaj Kumar G S Bhardwaj Rhea Ganguli S Sathyakumar Rupesh Bharathi Shazia Quasin V K Melkani V P Uniyal Umesh Tiwari CONTRIBUTORS Y P S Pangtey, Kumaun University, Nainital; D K Upreti, NBRI, Lucknow; S D Tiwari, Girls Degree College, Haldwani; Girija Pande, Kumaun University, Nainital; C S Negi & Kumkum Shah, Govt. P G College, Pithoragarh; Ruchi Pant and Ajay Rastogi, ECOSERVE, Majkhali; E Theophillous and Mallika Virdhi, Himprkrthi, Munsyari; G S Satyal, Govt. P G College Haldwani; Anil Bisht, Govt. P G College Narayan Nagar CONTENTS Preface i-ii Acknowledgements iii-iv 1. Task and the Approach 1-10 1.1 Background 1.2 Feasibility Study 1.3 The Approach 2. Description of Target Landscape 11-32 2.1 Background 2.2 Administrative 2.3 Physiography and Climate 2.4 River and Glaciers 2.5 Major Life zones 2.6 Human settlements 2.7 Connectivity and remoteness 2.8 Major Land Cover / Land use 2.9 Vulnerability 3. Land Use and Land Cover 33-40 3.1 Background 3.2 Land use 4. -
Master Gardener Corner: Northern Bayberry Originally Run Week of December 6, 2016
This article is part of a weekly series published in the Batavia Daily News by Jan Beglinger, Agriculture Outreach Coordinator for CCE of Genesee County. Master Gardener Corner: Northern Bayberry Originally run week of December 6, 2016 Northern Bayberry (Myrica pensylvanica), is a dense- branching deciduous shrub with an open, rounded shape. Typically growing 6 to 12 feet high, it is frequentl y wider than it is tall. The multi-stemmed shrubs tend to sucker and may form good-sized colonies under ideal growing conditions. Bayberry is native to eastern North America. Hardy in zones 3 to 6, it is primarily found growing along the eastern coast from Newfoundland to western New York and south to North Carolina. Northern Bayberry Source: Dow Gardens , Dow Gardens, Bugwood.org Bayberry plants are dioecious which means that individual plants either have male or female flowers. Groupings of plants need at least one male plant to facilitate pollination of the female plants and to set fruit. Flowers occur in early spring and are not showy. Pollinated female plants produce very fragrant, BB-sized, blue-grey, waxy-coated berries in the fall. The glossy, semi-evergreen, dark green foliage is aromatic when crushed. The leaves slowly turn bronze or tan in the autumn and may hang on the shrub into the winter. Relatively easy to grow, plants grow best in full sun but will tolerate partial shade. They do well on dry, sandy, infertile soils but prefer acidic soils. They will also tolerate clay soils. Avoid soils with a high pH as plants may develop chlorosis. -
A Review on Ethnomedicinal, Phytochemical and Pharmacological Aspects of Myrica Esculenta
Review Article A Review on Ethnomedicinal, Phytochemical and Pharmacological Aspects of Myrica esculenta P. SOOD AND R. SHRI* Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Drug Research, Punjabi University, Patiala-147 002, India Sood and Shri: A Review on Phyto-pharmacological Aspects of Myrica esculenta Myrica esculenta (Myricaceae) commonly known as box berry or kaphal is an important Indian medicinal plant. It is found in foothill tracks of Eastern Himalayas, Meghalaya, Nepal, China and Pakistan. Local tribes mainly use its fruits to prepare pickle and refreshing drinks. Traditionally, the bark has been used for the treatment of cough, asthma, fever, chronic bronchitis, diarrhoea, rheumatism and inflammation; roots have been used in bronchitis, asthma, cholera and flowers claimed to treat earache, diarrhoea, paralysis. Phytochemical studies of the different parts of plant revealed the presence of various bioactive phytoconstituents such as phenolic compounds, alkaloids, glycosides, triterpenoids and volatile oils. The plant is also reported to have innumerable significant pharmacological activities like analgesic, anxiolytic, antiallergic, antidiabetic, antimicrobial, antihypertensive, antiulcer, antioxidant and antiinflammatory evaluated by using various animal models. The objective of the present review article is to compile all the relevant published information regarding traditional uses, phytochemistry and therapeutic potential of M. esculenta. For this purpose various databases and books were examined. The review clearly demonstrates the importance of this plant in ethnomedicine and its immense potential in modern medicine. Key words: Myrica esculenta, kaphal, box berry, phytoconstituents, pharmacology The genus Myrica consists about 97 species of small tree M. esculenta commonly known as Boxberry, Kaiphal and aromatic shrubs belonging to family Myricaceae. and Kathphala has been reported to be the only species These are reported to be globally distributed in both found in India[11]. -
Myrica Faya: Review of the Biology, Ecology, Distribution, and Control, Including an Annotated Bibliography Candace J
COOPERATIVE NATIONAL PARK RESOURCES STUDIES UNIT UNIWRSITY OF HAWAI'I AT MANOA Department of Botany 3190 Maile Way Honolulu, Hawai'i 96822 (808) 956-821 8 Technical Report 94 Myrica faya: Review of the Biology, Ecology, Distribution, and Control, Including an Annotated Bibliography Candace J. Lutzow-Felling, Donald E. Gardner, George P. Markin, Clifford W. Smith UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI'I AT MANOA NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Cooperative Agreement CA 8037-2-0001 April 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS ... LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................... 111 ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................... v INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 DESCRIPTIVE BIOLOGY ............................................................................................. 2 Systematics .................................... ............................................................................ 2 Anatomy ..................................................................................................................... 4 Growth Form ................................................................................................................ 4 Reproductive Structures ...............................................................................................5 Inflorescence ...................... ... ..........................................................................5 -
Uttarakhand) Himalaya, India: a Case Study in Context to Multifarious Tourism Growth and Peri-Urban Encroachments Aravind Kumar
World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Vol:11, No:5, 2017 Ethno-Botanical Diversity and Conservation Status of Medicinal Flora at High Terrains of Garhwal (Uttarakhand) Himalaya, India: A Case Study in Context to Multifarious Tourism Growth and Peri-Urban Encroachments Aravind Kumar year. Shri Badrinath, Kedarnath, Rudranath, Tungnath, Abstractt—The high terrains of Garhwal (Uttarakhand) Himalaya Kalpeshwar, Madhyamaheshwar, Adi Badri, Bhavishya Badri, are the niches of a number of rare and endemic plant species of great Kali Math, Joshimath, Hemkund Sahib, etc. are the most therapeutic importance. However, the wild flora of the area is still prominent pilgrimage sites of Hindus and Sikhs, whereas the under a constant threat due to rapid upsurge in human interferences, great peaks of Panpati Glacier (5553 m), Chaukhambha (a especially through multifarious tourism growth and peri-urban encroachments. After getting the status of a ‘Special State’ of the cluster of 4 peaks; measuring 6974 m to 7138 m), Kanaldani country since its inception in the year 2000, this newly borne State Khal (5968 m), Mukut Parvat (7242 m), cluster of Unta led to very rapid infrastructural growth and development. Dhura- GonkhaGad- Finga- Bampa Dhura (6355 m, 5749 m, Consequently, its townships started expanding in an unmanaged way 5096 m, 6241 m, 4600 m), Mapang- Nandakot (6861 m), grabbing nearby agricultural lands and forest areas into peri-urban Bajeiling Dhar (5816-5645 m) Baratola (5553 m), etc. landscapes. Simultaneously, a boom in tourism and pilgrimage in the infatuate thousands and thousands of trekkers and state and the infrastructural facilities raised by the government for tourists/pilgrims are destroying its biodiversity.