Mumbai Heritage Conservation Committee

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI

MUMBAI HERITAGE CONSERVATION COMMITTEE

MINUTES OF THE THIRTY FIFTH MEETING

Date: Wednesday, 15 / 11 / 2017.

Time: 02.00 am to 05.30 pm.

Venue: Conference Hall at 5th floor, M.C.G.M. Head Office, Annex Bldg., Mahapalika Marg, Fort, Mumbai.

The following members were present: 1. Dr. Ramanath Jha, Chairman; 2. Dr. P.P. Bhave, Member; 3. Prof. Rajiv Mishra, Member, 4. Sanjay Gedam, Ch. Arch., GOM; 5. Shri Chetan Raikar, Member.

The following officers were in attendance: 1. Shri S. S. Chavan Dy. Ch. Eng. (D.P.) - II 2. Shri Umesh Nagarkar Dy. Municipal Architect (D.P.) 3. Shri Deepak Bidve Sr. Architect (D.P.) 4. Shri Rituraj Karanjkar Sub-engineer (Architect) D.P.

Leave of absence was granted to the following members - Dr. Manjiri Kamat, Prof. V. B. Deshmukh, Shri Sabyasachi Mukherjee, Shri A. A. Bage and Shri S.P. Darade, Ch. Eng. (D.P.), Member Secretary, MHCC.

A. Confirmation of minutes of previous meeting: Minutes of the previous MHCC meetings dated 13.10.2017 (34th) were confirmed and the office was instructed to get the final copy of minutes signed by the Chairman.

B. The following proposals which were discussed previously were then considered:

Page 1 of 26

1. Case No. :634 / 2017 Sr. No.: Nil Grade - Precinct ‘Divider at Marine Drive’

Proposal: - Proposed provision of barricades to the existing central road divider from Tambe Chowk to Yoga Centre at N.S. Road (Marine Drive), Mumbai. Applicant: - Dy. Ch. Eng. (Roads) City Ref: - i) Letter u/no. CHE/19768/DP-DyMA dated 13.10.2017; ii) Earlier remarks of the MHCC dtd.02.02.2016 and 28.09.2017.

This is with reference to the earlier proposal considered by the MHCC for proposed S. S. Railing from Tambe Chowk to Yoga Center at N.S.Road (Marine Drive) on newly constructed divider and along the footpath, falling in the Marine Drive Precinct. The Committee was of the opinion that Marine Drive is the most prominent heritage promenade in the City and openness is one of the main characters. By installing railings at divider and footpath the openness would be lost. Also, the railing was never a part of footpaths in this area and the Committee did not approve the same. It was however suggested to landscape the central divider if so required.

The Committee had suggested that the application for the central divider with revised design of landscaping (like providing mehendi shrubs) as suggested by the Committee may be submitted separately in due course, if so desired, by the concerned dept. for the consideration of the Committee. The said remarks were forwarded to the applicant vide letter dated 28.09.2017.

Accordingly, the applicant has now submitted revised application proposing landscaping at the existing central road divider.

Decision of the Committee in today’s meeting: - The proposal was submitted by Roads Dept. for the landscaping of the central divider and officials from Roads dept. were present. The Asst. Commissioner, ‘A’ Ward, along with concerned Police Officials also presented 3 alternative designs in the meeting, prepared by architect Ratan Batlibhoy who had earlier worked on the beautification project at Marine Drive, for proposed installation of S.S. railing / barricade at the central divider. It was explained by the Asst. Commissioner, ‘A’ Ward and Police officials that considering the spur in the number of accidents caused due to crossing at Marine Drive, it is essential to install such railings to discourage people from crossing the road divider. The Committee considered the proposed options from the point of view of the intervention to be aesthetically in sympathy with the precinct and also caters to the purpose of its installation. The Committee, after consideration, accepted design option-1 for S.S. railing, however, it was suggested to use brushed finish S.S. instead of glossy finish. The

Page 2 of 26 railing would be fixed at both the edges of the divider with the landscaped portion in- between. It was decided that a prototype design of approved railing would be installed, along with landscaping, at the most vulnerable stretch of road and the rest of the work shall be carried out after inspection & approval of the prototype design. . Subject to this the Committee decided to grant its NOC for installation of S.S. Railing and landscaping of the central divider from Tambe Chowk to Yoga Centre at N.S. Road (Marine Drive) as presented today. The applicants were requested to submit final sets of drawings incorporating today’s discussion, for vetting and issuing NOC of the MHCC.

2. Case No. :596 / 2017 Sr. No.:633(9) Ballard Estate Sub Precinct

‘Jahaz Bhavan’

Proposal: -Proposed redevelopment of commercial Building of “Director General of Shipping” known as ‘Jahaz Bhavan’ on plot bearing C.S. No. 1190. of Fort division, W.H.Marg, ‘A’ ward, Mumbai – 400 001. Architect: -Deodhar Associates. Reference: - i) Application letters received on 06.07.2017, 14.08.2017 and 13.11.2017; ii) MHCC Meetings dated 08.08.2017, 07.09.2017 and 26.09.2017; iii) Site Visit dated 19.09.2017, iv) Remarks of the MHCC dated 31.10.2017.

The structure u/r is not individually graded but falls within ‘Ballard Estate Sub Precinct’ of Fort Precinct listed at Sr. No. 633(9) in the published heritage list 2012.

Original scope of work: - It was informed by the applicant that the building u/r was dilapidated and has been demolished in the past. The plot is now vacant and under Shipping Corporation of CPWD. The proposal is for redevelopment under DCR 33(3) which allows higher F.S.I up to 5. The existing building u/r comprised Ground + 6 + part 7th floors having offices of Shipping Corporation. It was informed that the existing office space was falling short for fulfilling the improved additional requirement over the period for better functionality of shipping corporation; hence more area is required to cater the present need. The said redevelopment proposal is purely Government building, developed by CPWD to consume the highest FSI of 5.00 and as per the present requirement, a 3 basement + stilt + 15 storied building having 58.70 m. height including staircase room &water tank above has been proposed.

Discussion of the Committee in its meeting dated 26.09.2017: - The site as well as other parts of Fort Precinct were visited by the Committee members on 19.09.2017. It was observed that although the site u/r is not part of the core of Ballard Estate Sub-precinct, it is

Page 3 of 26 part of streetscape of the road leading to the core and surrounding buildings are also approximately of 24 m in height. In fact the overall general existing height in Fort Precinct, of original buildings, is around 24 m barring few high rise buildings (eg. RBI HQ, Stock Exchange etc.) which are scattered in different parts of Fort Precinct. It was the collective opinion of the Committee that to strike a balance between maintaining skyline and allow development at the same time a height of 32 m could be considered in this Precinct especially in the main core between CST / GPO on the north side and up to Museum on the south. The Committee was, therefore, apprehensive about allowing a height more than 32 m up to terrace level in the instant case of ‘Jahaj Bhavan’. The architect was requested to submit revised proposal conforming to the same. It was also suggested to consider expanding the footprint to the extent possible for maximum consumption of permissible area on the plot.

Aforesaid remarks of the MHCC were forwarded to applicant vide letter dated 31.10.2017 and it was suggested to submit a revised proposal accordingly for further consideration of the Committee.

Revised proposal: - The applicant has now submitted revised design for the said redevelopment proposal comprising double basement + ground + 9 upper floors with total height of 32 m up to terrace level. The front elevation comprising a mix of glass façade and logo / emblem of Shipping Corporation is proposed. The rest of the façade is in sympathy with general elevational character observed in the Ballard Pier Precinct.

Decision of the Committee in today’s meeting: - The Committee noted that as suggested earlier, the height of the proposed building has been restricted to 32 m. The alternate elevations for front facade were also submitted by the architect. The Committee felt the elevations could be toned down and reworked to be more in harmony with the Ballard Pier precinct. The architect was requested accordingly. Subject to the elevations being got approved form the MHCC before issue of C.C. above plinth level, it was decided to grant NOC from heritage point of view to the revised plans for reconstruction of 'Jahaz Bhavan' building.

C. The following new proposals / cases were considered:

1. Case No. :641 / 2017 Sr. No.: 121 Grade - I

‘Ornamental poles at CSTM & MCGM Head-office’

Page 4 of 26

Proposal: - Proposed installation of heritage themed poles for illumination and beautification of area in front of CSMT and MCGM Head Office in Fort, Mumbai. Applicant: - Assistant Commissioner ‘A’ Ward. Ref: - CHE/21526/DP-DyMA dated 03.11.2017;

This is with reference to the letter received from Assistant Commissioner ‘A’ Ward seeking NOC from the MHCC for ‘proposed installation of heritage themed poles for illumination and beautification of area in front of CSMT and MCGM Head Office in Fort, Mumbai.’

The area u/r is situated within the ‘BMC Sub Precinct’ of the ‘Fort Precinct’ which is listed at Sr. No. 633 (12) in the heritage list. The site u/r also falls within 100 mts heritage buffer of ‘Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Terminus’, a world heritage site, which is also a Grade I structure listed at Sr. No. 121 and MCGM Headquarters which is a proposed Grade I structure included in the heritage list.

It has been stated in the application that at present there are 22 nos of street light and 10 nos of traffic signal poles installed at the area u/r which are visually obtrusive to the visitors. It is now proposed to replace the existing 22 nos of street light poles along with 10 traffic signal poles with 5 nos of heritage themed street light poles and 4 nos of traffic signal poles. The existing sodium vapor fixtures will be replaced with 136 W LED fixtures.

It is further informed that as per sanction of Hon’ble M.C. u/no. MGC/F/4635 dated 03.10.2017, tenders were invited to carry out the aforesaid works on 14.10.2017.

Decision of the Committee in today’s meeting: - The proposal was explained by the Asst. Commissioner, ‘A’ Ward. It was noted by the Committee that the existing number of poles will be reduced thereby minimizing visual clutter. It was observed that one of the proposed poles at traffic signal in front of CSMT and MCGM may obstruct the view of heritage structures from viewing gallery and it was suggested to shift the said pole accordingly for a clear view. It was also suggested to use appropriate bracket design for the pole respecting the period and architectural language of the surrounding heritage structures. Subject to the above and obtaining all other applicable permissions from concerned authorities, the Committee decided to grant its NOC purely from heritage point of view for the said proposal. The Assistant Commissioner ‘A’ Ward and the consultants were requested to submit final sets of drawings for vetting of the Committee. The Committee also discussed with the Assistant Commissioner ‘A’ Ward as to whether such type of beautification is planned in other parts of the Fort Precinct. The Committee

Page 5 of 26 was of the opinion that the historical Fort Precinct has a potential to be revived to its original glory through such subtle changes and sensitive additions. It was given to understand that funds could be a major factor for carrying out such changes. It was therefore suggested by the Committee that a long term comprehensive plan could be worked out for entire Fort Precinct to add more character to the Precinct.

2. Case No. :640 / 2017 Sr. No.: 211-d Grade – I

‘Ornamental poles at Gateway of India’

Proposal: - Proposed repairs / refurbishment of the existing heritage themed ornamental poles installed in the premises of Gateway of India in ‘A’ Ward, Mumbai. Applicant: - Assistant Commissioner ‘A’ Ward. Ref: - CHE/21527/DP-DyMA dated 03.11.2017;

This is with reference to the letter received from Assistant Commissioner ‘A’ Ward seeking NOC from the MHCC for ‘proposed repairs / refurbishment of the existing heritage themed ornamental poles installed in the premises of Gateway of India in ‘A’ Ward, Mumbai.’

It has been informed that to enhance the beauty and for better illumination, 46 nos of heritage themed poles were installed more than 20 years ago at the Gateway of India premises and P. J. Ramchandani Marg. At present these ornamental poles are in dilapidated condition and needs to be repaired and refurbished. It is further informed that the Taj Mahal Palace Hotel situated near Gateway of India has submitted a proposal for repairs / refurbishment of the said ornamental poles in consultation with the Assistant Commissioner ‘A’ Ward and heritage consultants. The cost incurred for said repairs / refurbishment by retaining original brackets and providing new high quality Schreder Albany lamps for all 46 no. of ornamental poles shall be borne by Taj Mahal Palace Hotel. The maintenance of the poles for period of 5 years shall also be looked after by the Taj Mahal Palace Hotel.

It is further informed that the in-principle approval of Hon’ble M.C. has been obtained u/no. MGC/F/4845 dated 31.10.2017 to allow Hotel Taj Mahal Palace to repair / refurbish one pole by retaining its original bracket as a sample / presentation to Mumbai Heritage Conservation Committee.

Decision of the Committee in today’s meeting: - The proposal was explained by the Asst. Commissioner, ‘A’ Ward. Along with the refurbishment / revival of poles, new brackets were proposed to be installed at top supporting the light fixtures. It was also explained that

Page 6 of 26 additionally, bollards at edge of the footpath are also proposed to be installed in the said area. Alternatives bracket designs were presented. The Committee suggested combining certain design elements to come out with the final design of bracket. In case of bollards; it was suggested to use single chain instead of double chains for elegant look. These suggestions were accepted by the applicant and it was requested by the Committee to submit the revised designs / drawings for vetting. Subject to this and obtaining all other applicable permissions from concerned authorities, the Committee decided to grant its NOC purely from heritage point of view for the said proposal.

3. Case No. :638 / 2017 Sr. No.: 537 Buffer / vista of Grade - I

‘Buffer / vista of Shivaji Park Maidan’ Proposal: - Proposed redevelopment of property known as ‘Makhanwala Bungalow’, bearing C.S. No. 1787 of Mahim Div, Plot No. 77, Shivaji Park, Keluskar Road, G/N Ward, Dadar (W), Mumbai. Applicant: - Tathastu Builders LLP. Ref: - CHE / 20619 / DPC dtd. 25.10.2017.

The site u/r is situated on south side of the ‘Shivaji Park’ abutting Keluskar Road. The plot u/r is situated within buffer / vista of ‘Shivaji Park’ maidan which is a Grade-I site listed at Sr. No. 537 of notified heritage list of G/N Ward.

Scope of Work: - The proposal contemplates redevelopment of existing G+2 storied non cessed building known as ‘Makhanwala Bungalow’ with construction of a new residential building comprising Ground + 5 + attic (part) upper floors with total height of 23.95 m up to ridge level of attic floor.

Decision of the Committee in today’s meeting: - It was noted by the Committee that being a non cessed building, the redevelopment proposal is for consumption of regular FSI and the total height therefore works out to be only up to 24 m till the ridge level of attic floor as envisaged by applicant. The Committee was of opinion that the proposed height fits within the general policy of the Committee for new buildings in the Shivaji Park maidan buffer. Considering this, the Committee decided to grant its NOC purely from heritage point of view for the said redevelopment proposal subject to approvability / authenticity of the proposal being subsequently examined and got confirmed by the concerned B.P. dept.

4. Case No. :633 / 2017 Sr. No.: 633 Grade - Precinct

‘Jhansi Castle –Majestic Sub-Precinct'

Page 7 of 26

Proposal: - Proposed redevelopment under DCR 33(7) of existing building known as ‘Jhansi Castle’ on plot bearing C.S. No. 16, plot no. 3, Cooperage Road, Fort Division, ‘A’ Ward, Mumbai. . Architect: - B. N. Shah & Associates. Ref: - i) CHE/19234/DPC dtd.09.10.2017; ii) Site visit dated 13.10.2017.

The site u/r is located at Cooperage Road in ‘A’ Ward is situated within Majestic Sub Precinct of Fort Precinct.

Scope of Work: - The proposal contemplates reconstruction under 33(7) of the existing G+5 storied building by constructing a new Basement (2 levels) + Ground + 4 podiums + 5th to 19th storied building. The proposed building comprises of 2 levels of basements for parking / services, parking at ground and 4 podium levels and residential units from 5th to 19th floors. The total height of the building would be 69.90 m up to terrace floor level.

Related information: - The redevelopment proposal u/r is conceived under DCR 33(7) involving rehabilitation, incentive FSI as sale component, additional FSI and other relevant provisions. This being only a precinct building, as per the provisions of 67 (2) (iii-b), the provisions of heritage regulations won’t apply but special permission of M.C. needs to be obtained. However, as the site is in ‘A’ Ward the provisions of Govt. directive of 1995 may be applicable which states that the height of building after reconstruction has to be limited to the existing height of the buildings of similar age in the surrounding area and any new building has to conform to the general skyline in the area. The architect has submitted a height study plan which shows that there are few multistoried buildings in the immediate surrounding and majority of the area on west side of Cooperage maidan is also comprising of a number of high rise buildings. The Committee in its recent consideration of redevelopment proposal for ‘Jahaz Bhavan’ had recommended that a height of 32 m may be appropriate for that area (Ballard Pier Sub Precinct). The Committee had however also opined that this recommendation would be appropriate mainly for the core area of Fort Precinct spanning from CSMT to Flora Fountain / Museum area. Decision of the Committee in today’s meeting: - The site was visited by Committee members on 13.10.2017 and it was observed that the existing building as such does not have any prominent heritage features apart from the fact that the immediate adjoining buildings are of similar scale. The facts mentioned in earlier paragraph in relation to this proposal were also noted. Due to shortage of time the Committee decided to discuss the proposal in detail in the next meeting.

Page 8 of 26

5. Case No. :643 / 2017 Sr. No.: 511 Grade - IIB

‘Raj Bhavan Complex’ Proposal: - Proposed dismantling of existing structure known as ‘Jal Bhushan Bungalow’ at Raj Bhavan Complex, Malabar Hill in ‘D’ Ward, Mumbai. Applicant: - Executive Engineer, PWD, Pune. Ref: - i) Application from PWD received on 01.11.2017; ii) Letter to Secretary to Governor of Maharashtra from the Chairman, MHCC dated 09.11.2017.

The ‘Raj Bhavan complex’ is located at Walkeshwar Road, Malabar Hill, Mumbai and is listed at Sr. No. 511 as a Grade II-B site in the 1995 Heritage List with a specific mention of ‘Banquet Hall and Marina’ structures.

A letter was received from Executive Engineer, PWD, Pune seeking NOC of the MHCC for dismantling of existing structure known as ‘Jal Bhushan Bungalow’ at Raj Bhavan Complex. It was informed that the ‘Jal Bhushan’ bungalow u/r, the existing residence of Hon’ble Governor, was extensively damaged and got repaired many times in the past. Various Committees / agencies were appointed so far to study condition of these buildings. In view of the reports from various Committees / agencies regarding safety of Jal Bhushan Bungalow, a meeting was held between Hon’ble Governor, Secretary to the Governor, Comptroller of the household to the Governor and other PWD officials on 27.10.2017 and 31.10.2017 at Raj Bhavan, Mumbai. In the said meeting it was directed by Hon’ble Governor to dismantle the existing Jal Bhushan Bungalow and process reconstruction of a new bungalow with all modern amenities, with consent of the MHCC and other mandatory approvals.

Decision of the Committee in today’s meeting: - It was noted by the Committee that Chairman MHCC has communicated to the Secretary, Governor of Maharashtra about need to prepare a comprehensive development / restoration plan for Raj Bhavan Complex so that instead of considering proposals from Raj Bhavan Complex in piece meal manner, the MHCC could take a holistic view. The Committee was in agreement with this view and suggested applicant to prepare a comprehensive restoration / development plan for the Raj Bhavan Complex. The structural status of the structure u/r was discussed by the Committee. In view of the structural reports from various Committees / agencies as submitted, the Committee was of opinion that the said structure could be dismantled as proposed. However, the Committee

Page 9 of 26 suggested preparing comprehensive documentation and salvaging plan for the said building before proceeding for demolition. It was also advised to submit plans for reconstruction, if any, of the ‘Jal Bhushan Bungalow’. Subject to this and obtaining all other applicable permissions from concerned authorities, the Committee decided to grant its NOC purely from heritage point of view for dismantling of ‘Jal Bhushan Bungalow’ at Raj Bhavan Complex.

6. Case No. :642 / 2017 Sr. No.: 375/82 Proposed Grade II-B

‘Matharpakhadi Club’ Proposal: - Proposed redevelopment of property bearing C.S. No. 448 of MAzgaon Division, situated at Champsi Bhimji Marg, Mazgaon in ‘E’ Ward, Mumbai. Applicant: - M/s Arvind Propoerties Pvt. Ltd.. Ref: - i) Application u/no. CHE/21642/DP-DyMA dated 06.11.2017; ii) A copy of application addressed to Hon’ble M.C. received on 03.10.2017.

The representation by Arvind Properties Pvt. Ltd. requesting to allow redevelopment on the property u/r without insisting NOC from the MHCC for the redevelopment purpose has been received by this office on 06.11.2017.

The following points from the submission may be noted: • The proposal for redevelopment under earlier regn. 33(7) of 1991 was submitted to B.P. dept. in 2002. As per D.P. remark dated 03.09.2001, existing building on plot u/r was situated in the proposed ‘Mathar Pakhadi Precinct’.

• The IOD for the said proposal was issued u/no. EB/8715/E/A on 17.12.2003 and the same was revalidated till the period ending on 05.06.2009.

• Thereafter the application for Commencement Certificate was submitted. However, the C.C. was not granted for want of Collector’s NOC since the plot u/r was a Collector Land. Subsequently, after due procedure, the requisite NOC from the Collector was obtained.

• Meanwhile, MBR&R Board and MCGM issued a notice dated 19.05.2007 to vacate the premises since the building was in dangerous / dilapidated condition. After the premises was vacated by existing tenants, the demolition of the existing building u/r was started as per IOD and by 2009, 90% portion of the building was demolished (excluding the portion of tenant / occupant of Mathar Pakhadi Club).

Page 10 of 26

• Remark from heritage point of view from Dy. Municipal Architect was also obtained on 12.11.2007 wherein it was stated that ‘As per the sanctioned heritage list under DCR-67 the present heritage status of the property is as ‘Precinct’. In light of the same and as per the circular of M.C. dated 30.10.2007, for development under DCR-33(7) of the said property, the NOC from heritage point of view would not be required but only special permission of M.C. is required to be obtained’.

• Subsequently, at the time of obtaining C.C. for the redevelopment, the B.P. dept. informed the applicant that the earlier IOD cannot be revalidated and fresh approval was insisted.

• Thereafter, fresh proposal was submitted along with revised NOC from MBR&R Board for permissible FSI of 3, requisite NOC from Collector of Mumbai and permission from D.P. dept. for development of Public Hall & welfare Centre reservation.

• Meanwhile in 2012, a draft new heritage list was published. The plot u/r was included at Sr. No. 375/82 under name ‘Mhatarpakhadi Club’ as a proposed Grade II-B site.

• Remarks from heritage point of view were already obtained in 2007 for the said proposal and before publication of the draft heritage list of 2012, 90% portion of existing structure was already demolished.

• Since the IOD was issued, majority of tenants were shifted, building has been partially demolished and rent is paid to tenants since then.

The following observations of the office may also be noted:

• The site u/r was part of the extended draft ‘Mhatarpakhadi Precinct’ as published in 1999. As per Govt. notification of 25.01.1999 and the circular of M.C. dated 30.10.2007 for development under DCR-33(7), the NOC from heritage point of view was not insisted in this case by MCGM and the said structure was partly demolished in 2009 subsequent to the notice from MBR&R Board and MCGM.

• Subsequent to this, the draft new heritage list was published in 2012 in which the said site / structure was individually included at Sr. No. 375/82 under name ‘Mhatarpakhadi Club’ as a proposed Grade II-B site. It may be noted that the draft list of 2012 was published based on the survey and documentation done by the MMRHCS in 2005-06. Hence the dilapidated condition / demolished state of building was not reflected in the said published list of 2012.

Page 11 of 26

• It may also be noted that the Heritage Review Committee (HRC), appointed by Hon’ble M.C. for reviewing the said draft list of 2012 including ‘Review of existing Heritage Listing’ and the ‘Proposed New Listing’ has forwarded its report for ‘E’ Ward to Hon’ble M.C. wherein the individual entry of ‘Mhatarpakhadi Club’ has been recommended to be deleted as the structure being in ruins. The Hon’ble M.C. while forwarding the report to the Govt. had upheld the said recommendation of HRC for deletion of individual entry of ‘Mhatarpakhadi Club’. The said report is under consideration of the Govt. The published boundary of ‘Mhatarpakhadi Precinct’ was also reviewed by HRC and the bounbdary of precinct was revised. The site u/r was excluded from the Precinct Boundary. An indicative buffer was recommended around the precinct which included the site u/r of Matharpakhadi Club. However, the Hon’ble M.C. while forwarding the report to the Govt. opined that only the core of ‘Matharpakhadi as prescribed by the HRC should be listed without the indicative buffer.

As per the submitted plans the revised redevelopment proposal contemplates construction of a new basement + ground + 3 level podium parking + stilt + service floor + 15 upper floors with total height of 69.90 m up to terrace level.

Decision of the Committee in today’s meeting: - The facts as stated by the applicant in its representation were noted by the Committee. It was also noticed that the structure u/r has been partly demolished on site in view of IOD and remarks from heritage point of view based on its erstwhile status, as received earlier. The fact that the said site has been recommended for deletion by the HRC / M.C, endorses that the site / structure no longer merits as a heritage structure. Taking into account earlier process carried out in this regard and present status of the structure, the Committee decided to grant its consent for processing of the said redevelopment proposal by the Hon’ble MC / concerned dept. of MCGM as per the provisions of general DCR’s / policies in force.

7. Case No. :608 / 2017 Sr. No.: 214 Grade II-B

‘Parsi Lying in Hospital' Proposal: - Proposed structural repairs to the existing building known as ‘Parsi Lying in Hospital’ situated at A. K. Nayak Marg, Fort, Mumbai. Applicant: - The Chairman, Parsi Punchayet Funds and Properties, Fort, Mumbai. Ref: - i) Application u/no. CHE/013168/DPC 28.07.2017; ii) Compliance letter issued on 09.08.2017.

The site u/r located at A.K. Nayak Marg in ‘A’ Ward is listed at Sr. No. 214 as a proposed Grade II-B structure in the heritage list.

Page 12 of 26

Scope of Work: - It was informed that the hospital building in not under operation since past few years due to lack of structural repairs. Now the trust has decided to carry out structural repairs with respect to the structural audit carried out by Mr. V. J. Joshi and following scope of work has been mentioned:

• Repairs to roof T.W. members, replacement of deteriorated and defected T.W. rafters, purlins, planks. Replacement of damaged mangalore tiles; • Waterproofing of part terrace; • Plastering to terrace parapet. Plastering to external three side wall (part in south, north and east side); • Repairs to balconies; • Replacement of damaged T.W. posts; • Repairs to damaged RCC members by polymer mortar / micro concrete; • Repairs / waterproofing of toilet; • Replacement of damaged flooring; • Repairs to doors and windows; • Replacement of damaged water / drainage pipe lines; • Repairs to Jack Arch flooring by grouting and re-plastering; • Repairs to stone wall by cleaning and re-pointing with lime mortar; • Repairs to arch stitching and grouting.

Decision of the Committee in today’s meeting: - The scope of work and methodology for repairs was explained by the applicant / structural consultant. It was noted by the Committee that the structure u/r, specifically third floor has been in state of disrepair and is in need of repairs. The scope of work and the methodology proposed was found to be approvable by the Committee and it was decided to grant its NOC for the said repairs purely from heritage point of view subject to ensuring stability of the said structure and obtaining all other applicable permissions from concerned authorities / depts.

8. Case No. :644 / 2017 Sr. No: 181/229 (Prop.) Grade: - II-A

‘R.C.C. bell tower - Holy Magi Church’ Proposal: - Independent Bell-tower structure constructed for bell in the premises of ‘Holi Magi Church’, CTS No.1341 & 1342 of Village Gorai, Borivali, Mumbai, 400091. Applicant: - Rev. Fr. Edward Jacinto. Architect: - Shirish Sukhatme & Associates. Ref: - i) CHE/ 020491 /DP/DyMA(Heritage) dtd.24.10.2017. ii) CHE/ 021949 /DP/DyMA(Heritage) dtd.08.11.2017.

Page 13 of 26

The premises of Holy Magi Church are situated at Gorai village. The Church u/r is included in the proposed heritage list published in 2012 at Sr.No.181/229 under grade II-A category.

Scope of Work: - A proposal was received from Rev. Fr. Edward Jacinto seeking permission from the Heritage Committee for the R.C.C. bell tower structure in the form of an ornamental cross which has been erected next to the main church building for the purpose of housing the new donated church bell inside. The height of the bell tower is 13.30 m. and the church building height is 15.05 m. up to ridge level. The photographs of said constructed R.C.C. bell tower and the premises of church u/r have been submitted.

Decision of the Committee in today’s meeting: – It was informed by the appointed architect that the Holi Magi Church’ and the Holy Magi Church Authority were unaware of the heritage status of the site u/r in the draft list published in 2012 and the R.C.C. bell tower was constructed in the said premises. The Church has formally requested post-facto NOC / approval of MHCC for the said Bell Tower. The application was considered and it was noticed that due to the construction of said bell tower, the view / vista of main church structure has not been hampered. Considering all, the Committee decided to grant its post- facto NOC for the said construction of bell tower subject to obtaining all other applicable permissions from concerned authorities / depts.

9. Case No. :648 / 2017 Sr. No.: 538, 539 Grade - IIB

‘Haffkin Institute / Tata Memorial Cancer Hospital’ Proposal: - Proposed development of Hostel Facility for residents and trainee doctors & Dharamshala for patients and their attendants on plot bearing C.S. No. 3/330 of Parel-Shivdi Div., G.D. Ambedkar Marg, Parel, Mumbai. Architect: - Pravin Kanekar. Applicant: - M/s Tata Memorial Centre. Ref: - Application received on 30.10.2017.

The sites u/r of Haffkin Institute and Haffkin Institute, Directors residence have been listed at Sr. No. 538, 539 respectively as Grade II-B sites in the sanctioned heritage list. The said buildings are situated in the Haffkin Institute campus, the boundary of which is shown as the listed heritage site boundary.

It has been informed that the part of land from Haffkin Institute (approx. 5 acres) has been allotted to Tata Memorial Centre on lease by Govt. The development of this 5 acre land is now proposed in three phases. The proposed development in phase 1 & 2 contemplates construction of a new Basement + stilt + 2 podiums + 15 upper storied hostel building with

Page 14 of 26 total height of approx 53.40 m up to terrace level. The proposed development in Phase 3 (future) contemplates construction of a new double basement + ground + 11 upper storied hospital building.

Decision of the Committee in today’s meeting: - It was noted by the Committee that as per the heritage D.P. sheets in office records, the entire complex of Haffkin Institute has been shown included in the heritage category. However, as per the notified list, the Haffkin Institute and Directors residence have been separately included under Grade II-B category. Therefore the Committee concluded that apart from these two structures, the rest of the area in the Haffkin Institute complex can be considered as outside heritage influence zone for allowing certain development. Also as the govt. has allotted this portion of land to a charitable organization in public interest, the Committee decided to consider the proposal. It was also noted that a part of site u/r also falls within buffer of ‘Baradevi Temple’ which is an ASI protected monument. However, it was informed by the applicant that only the development under phase 3 would be affected by the ASI buffer and development in phase 1 & 2 is outside the ASI buffer. However, it was decided to request the concerned B.P. dept. to check the applicability of the ASI remarks / NOC for proposed works in phase 1 & 2 and then processing the proposal further. Considering all, the Committee decided to grant its NOC from heritage point of view for the said development proposal subject to obtaining all other applicable permissions from concerned authorities / depts. as above.

10. Case No. :645 / 2017 Sr. No.: nil Notified Marine Drive Precinct

‘Restoration of Parsi Gate at Marine’

Proposal: - Proposed restoration of Parsi Gate at N.S.Road (Marine Drive promonede) Opp. Aquarium, ’C’ ward, Mumbai. Applicant: - Executive Engineer (H.Q.)/Sr.H.C.Engineer. Ref: - i) CHE / 022092 / DP/ DyMA(Heritage) dtd.09.11.2017; ii) CHE / 022241/ DP/DyMA(Heritage) dtd.10.11.2017.

The Parsi Gate u/r situated at Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose road, Marine Drive promenade is situated within the notified Marine Drive Precinct.

Scope of Work: - The Sr. Heritage Conservation Engineer has sought permission from the Heritage Committee for restoration of Parsi Gate u/r. The following works have been proposed: • Gently cleaning the surface with specialized water misting technique;

Page 15 of 26

• Repair & restoration of lime stone work; • Dutchman repair to stone masonry by providing stainless steel key & protective coating to masonry; • Removing & resetting dislodged stone masonry; • Removing old damaged flooring & providing new granite flooring.

Decision of the Committee in today’s meeting: - It was noted by the Committee that the proposal is essentially for restoration of the said Parsi Gate. The Committee found the scope of work and methodology as proposed approvable from heritage point of view. However, it was suggested by the Committee not to opt for protective coating to the masonry. Subject to this and obtaining all other applicable permissions from concerned authorities / depts., the Committee decided to grant its NOC for the said restoration proposal.

11. Case No. :632 / 2017 Sr. No.:- 633 Grade: - Precinct ‘R.C.C. underground tank & pump house, near Horniman Circle’ Proposal: - Proposed R.C.C. underground tank & pump house on property bearing C.S. No. 194 of Fort Division at Junction of Mumbai Samachar Marg and Bruce Street, Fort, Mumbai - 400 001. Architect: - R.G. Kapadia, Kapadia Consultant. Reference: - Application letters received on 09.10.2017 and 14.11. 2017.

The site of proposed R.C.C. underground tank & pump house, located at rear side of ‘Sir Vithaldas Chamber’ building at Junction of Mumbai Samachar Marg and Bruce Street is situated within Fountain Sub Precinct of Fort precinct and also falls within 100 m from Horniman Circle which is a Grade I site.

Scope of Work: - The scope of work contemplates construction of R.C.C. underground tank & pump house on account of requirements for providing Fire Fighting Tank. It was informed that, presently there are M.S. Tanks in the back open space of ‘Sir Vithaldas Chamber’ building and it is necessary to replace the M.S. Tanks by an underground R.C.C. Tank and Pump House with an additional capacity as presently there is no space to provide additional water tank. The proposed work includes erection of R.C.C. Fire-fighting underground tank of 50000 lits capacity and Domestic water tank of 15000 lits Capacity. The proposed height of structure would be 2.60 m from ground level including pump room.

Decision of the Committee in today’s meeting: - It was noted by the Committee that the work is mainly to build an underground tank of 50000 lits capacity for fire-fighting. As the

Page 16 of 26 location of tank is at the rear side of the building, it would not be visible from any of the surrounding roads. Considering this, the Committee decided to grant its NOC from heritage point of view for the said proposal subject to obtaining all other applicable permissions and ensuring structural stability of surrounding buildings.

D. Following applications seeking Completion Certificate of the MHCC were then considered: -

1. Case No. :629 / 2017 Sr. No.: 550 Grade - III

‘Julekha House’

Proposal: - Repairs to building No. 184, known as ‘Zulekha House’, Cadell Road, Mahim, G/N Ward, Mumbai. Applicant: - G. M. Redekar & Associates. Ref: - i) Application for completion certificate received on 06.10.2017; ii) MHCC NOC dated 17.05.2017.

The site u/r is situated abutting Veer Savarkar Marg and the building u/r is listed at Sr. No. 550 as a Grade III structure in the sanctioned heritage list for G/N Ward.

Scope of Work: - In this case NOC of the MHCC for repairs to the building u/r was granted vide letter dated 17.05.2017 for the following scope of work: • External plaster work. • Door and windows repair work by using polymer treatment wherever necessary. • Terrace water proofing work. While granting the NOC it was insisted by the MHCC that, original elevational features such as plaster grooves, bands, texture etc. should be maintained. Now, the applicant has informed that the said works have been completed and Completion Certificate of the MHCC has been sought.

Decision of the Committee: - The Committee instructed the office to visit the site for examining the completed work status. Decision of the Committee was deferred until such time.

2. Case No. :636 / 2017 Sr. No.:141/7 Grade - IIA

‘Hamilton House’ Proposal: - Application seeking Completion Certificate for maintenance & repairs of the Hamilton House, Ballard Estate, ‘A’ ward.

Page 17 of 26

Architect: - Vikas Dilawari. References: - i) Application dtd. 18.11.2016 & 29.11.2016; ii) NOC of the MHCC u/no. CHE / 26981 / DPC dated 06.12.2016.

The site u/r is situated in the ‘A’ Ward, and is listed at Sr. No. 141/7 of the draft heritage list, as a Grade II- A site.

Scope of work as per NOC given by MHCC: - The MHCC has granted its NOC to the said proposal on 06.12.2016 for the following scope of work: • Complete flat terrace water proofing by removing Brick Bat and china mosaic and redoing the waterproofing to arrest leakages. • Complete refurbishment of mansard roof by removing china mosaic water proofing and redoing same using china mosaic tiles of dark colour or re-plastering and painting in a dark colour to high light character of mansard roof. • Replacing existing corrugated sheets roof over the staircase with galvume or corrugated G.I sheets painted in red terracotta or with wooden boarding and mangalore tiles above the existing sheets. Replacing side partitions in AC sheet near roof with clear FRP sheets to admit light into stairwell. • Removal of vegetation growth on building façade using weedicide or biocide. • Refurbishment of existing cement plaster of rear façade either by exposing the original stone façade provided the stone façade doesn’t get damaged. Alternatively, to avoid damage, the wall cane be crete plastered or texture painted to match the stone façade of the building. • Re-pointing the façade in lime mortar specially in localized areas where the joints are opened up. • Cleaning of stone façade scientifically, where soiled and removal of additives added in patches, if any. • Removal of unwanted A.C stands and painting of existing ones with attempt to camouflage them. • Repairs of teakwood frames and shutters of the windows and redoing the same where windows are missing and extensively damaged. • Providing 8” wide drip TW mold for protection of the teakwood glazed windows, prolonging the life of windows, without altering the architectural character. • Sealing of masonry & frame joints and TW architrave to prevent water entering. • Replacing of damaged PVC pipes with new CI pipes.

Page 18 of 26

Now the applicant has informed that said work has been completed as per the NOC and the Completion of the MHCC has been sought.

Decision of the Committee: - The completed works were found to be in line with the NOC granted and conforming to the heritage conservation norms. It was decided by the Committee to grant its Completion Certificate purely from heritage point of view for the said work.

3. Case No. :637 / 2017 Sr. No.:2/271 Grade - IIA

‘Byramjee Jeejeebhoy Parsee Charitable Institute’ Proposal: - Completion Certificate for periodic maintenance & repairs to Byramjee Jeejeebhoy Parsee Charitable Institute (BJPCI), on property bearing C.S.No.8 of Girgaon Division, Charni Road, Mumbai. Architect: - Vikas Dilawari. Ref: - i) Application dtd. 05.02.2015; ii) NOC of the MHCC u/no. CHE / 31461 / DPC dtd.26.02.2015.

The site u/r is situated in the ‘D’ Ward, and is listed at Sr. No. 2/271 of the Heritage List, as a Grade II- A Site.

Scope of work as per NOC given by MHCC: - The MHCC has granted its NOC to the said proposal on 26.02.2015 for the following scope of work: • Complete Roof repairs. • Complete flat terrace water proofing. • Re-pointing in Lime mortor. • Cleaning of the soiled areas only by mist cleaning. • Repairs to the teak wood glazed and louvered window. • Repairing & strengthening of the south side timber balcony. • Removal of vegetation growth. • Plumbing as essential and painting of the interiors. Now the architect has informed that the work has been completed at site and the Completion Certificate of the MHCC has been sought.

Page 19 of 26

E. Following additional items were also considered: -

1. Case No. :647 / 2017 Sr. No.: nil Grade- nil

‘R.G. cum Textile Museum’ Subject: - “R.G. cum Textile Museum” project at India United Mill No.2 & 3, Kala Chowky, E Ward. Applicant: - Municipal Architect Consultant: - Sir J.J.College Consultancy Cell Ref: - 1) Remarks forwarded by the previous MHCC by letter / report dtd. 2) CHE/M.A./1860/I Dtd.14.11.2017. An application has been received from the Municipal Architect on 14.11.2017 forwarding therewith the proposal received from Sir J.J.College Consultancy Cell for the proposed development of Textile Museum at India United Mill No. 2 & 3. The India United Mill No. 2 & 3 premises, with a plot area of about 65,000 sq.mtrs., was notified as a heritage precinct along with individually listed structures, chimney and water body within the said mill in 2008 by the Govt. Subsequently the Govt. has now (2017) reserved 44,000 sq.mtrs. of land from this mill for the purpose of “R.G. cum Textile Museum”. Earlier Consideration: - The proposal was initiated in 2008 – 09 when M/s.Abha Narain Lambah was the project consultant. The previous Committee after lot of discussion had prepared a report of its recommendations which was then forwarded in 2014 to the concerned dept. of MCGM. The following broad suggestions were then given. • The C.E. should form an advisory body of museologists / experts in the field who could assist the City Engineer for a design brief. • All the buildings within the Mill Precinct which were part of the original textile mill fabric are important and should be preserved. • The entire process should be recreated by using available machinery in their original set-up with audio and video exhibits in the same space to enhance / convey the process, if required. The NTC could be approached for acquiring machinery if required. • All the trees in the precinct should be preserved and a landscape plan to be submitted for the entire plot (preferably including the disputed 17000 sq.mts. as this was once an integral part of the Mill) • The water body which was part of the mill should be reactivated / restored.

Page 20 of 26

• Visitor’s facilities / amenities such as washrooms, restaurant, and souvenir shop should be provided and commercial users which are not related to the Textile Museum should not be provided. Instant Proposal: - The MCGM has now appointed Sir J.J.College Consultancy Cell as project consultant for the project who has prepared the plans for the proposed R.G. cum Textile Museum on the land component of 44,000 sq.mts. in India United Mill No.2 & 3. All the four nos. of structures, the chimney and water body which are included as individually listed structures / site in the notified heritage list for the said mill are situated in the said portion of land being planned as R.G. cum Textile Museum. As informed earlier the said proposal has been forwarded now by the Municipal Architect seeking NOC of the MHCC for the same. The salient features of the proposal are as follows :- • Out of the 6 nos. of individually listed structures / sites one of the structures at the North – West boundary of the mill premises (Spinning structure No.19, Listed as II B) has been proposed to be demolished. • In addition to the aforesaid structure another 6 structures, which are not individually listed but are part of the Precinct, are also proposed to be demolished. • The remaining structures, the chimney and water body are proposed to be restored and adaptively reused for the purpose of Textile Museum as per the planned usage. • The consultant has planned areas for museum gallery / display, area displaying old machinery to recreate the processes of mill, shops, auditorium, library, administrative office and facilities such as cafeteria etc. • In addition to above new structures and basement parking facility are also planned. • Open to sky plaza’s, recreation / landscaped areas are also planned.

The project is being planned in phases. The first phase would comprise demolition of structures as envisaged in the master plan and beautification around the water body. The repairs, restoration of the old existing structures and new construction would be undertaken in the second phase. Consideration by the Committee: - The previous Committee had given its remarks in this case which suggested retention of all the existing structures which are part of original mill fabric and important. In the instant plan not all the original structures are proposed for retention. Barring one structure all the individually listed heritage structures are proposed to be restored. It has been informed that the structures proposed for demolition are in extremely dilapidated condition and beyond repairs. It has however, been assured that the salvaged material from the demolished structures would be reused to the extent possible for the restoration of structures to be retained.

Page 21 of 26

The suggestion of the Committee to form an advisory body would be taken into consideration after completion of work and at the time of starting the actual functioning of museum. Apart from this all the other broad suggestions appear to have been incorporated in the latest proposal.

From the presentation and looking at the current photographs of the buildings at site, the Committee observed that the entire complex, being in the state of non maintenance for last several years, in a crumbling state and apart from the structures being proposed for demolition, even the structures proposed to be retained are in extremely ruinous condition and perhaps may have to be partly rebuilt. It is therefore essential to start the development activity for the intended textile museum at the earliest. It was also noted that the reservation of the land is also partly as a R.G. and therefore it may be essential to let go of some of the existing structures in this mill premises to make way for some open space for R.G. activity also.

The Committee since beginning had taken a view that this is not the primary responsibility of the Corporation. Now that it has been decided by concerned authorities that Corporation will develop this textile museum along with the R.G. component, it was decided to consider the proposal purely from heritage preservation point of view.

Decision of the Committee in today’s meeting: - The applicant (Municipal Architect) along with the Sir J. J. College Consultancy Cell members who are the project consultants were present during today’s meeting to explain the proposal. Prof. Rajiv Mishra, Principal, Sir J. J. College of Architecture who is also member of the MHCC, recused himself from deliberations and decision of the said matter. The overall layout was explained. It was informed that the project is divided in three phases. Phase-I contemplates cleaning / beautification of the lake and an open air landscaped area along with a kiosk for user amenities in the area adjoining the lake at north-west corner of site. The Phase-I would also comprise demolition of structures which are not significant for their preservation from heritage point of view and as per the proposed layout. These structures are not individually listed structures but are precinct structures, some of them beyond recognition due to collapse and loss of design elements. However, one of the structures shown as individually listed, is proposed for demolition citing lack of heritage character and with a view to clear the visual block in front of the most decorated façade in the complex. The Phase-II includes restoration of the old mill structures proposed to be retained and Phase-III would include construction of new structures / basement for parking and podium plaza etc.

Page 22 of 26

The Committee, after due consideration, in-principle decided to give its consent for the proposed layout. However, it was decided to visit the site first to evaluate the merit for demolition of structures as proposed by applicant and also to understand the overall site condition. It was decided that after the site visit and based on the observations, NOC for the Phase-I works including demolition of structures as proposed could be given. For Phase-II and Phase-III, applicant was requested to prepare details such as restoration methodology, material specifications, elevations etc. so that Committee can take an informed decision for these works.

2. Case No. :646 / 2017 Sr. No.: 322/30 Grade: II-A ‘P. T. Mane Garden’

Proposal: -Proposed development of ‘P.T.Mane Garden’ on C.S. No. 245 of Byculla Division at ‘E’Ward, Mumbai. Applicant: - Dy. Municipal Architect (Garden Cell) MCGM. Reference: - CHE / 022203/ DP/DyMA(Heritage) / dtd. 10.11.2017.

The ‘P.T. Mane Garden’, which is a designated R.G. plot, abuts Mirza Galib Marg in Byculla Division. The site u/r has been included at Sr. No. 322/30 as Grade II-A site in the proposed new heritage list of 2012.

Scope of Work: - A proposal was received on 13.11.2017 from Dy. Municipal Architect (Garden Cell) MCGM seeking permission from the Heritage Committee for development at ‘P.T. Mane Garden’. The scope of work includes up-gradation of the said garden envisaging the following - • Proposed repairs to compound wall of 1.2 mtr. ht. with 0.6 mtr M.S.Railing on top. • Existing tank above ground to be removed and underground tank is proposed. • Existing structure (details not given) near tank to be removed. • To repair existing changing room. • Proposed pathway /jogging using vyara/mud. • Creeper around the compound wall. • Existing wall and railing at Nursery area to be demolished. • Existing Nursery area to be rearranged & upgraded. • New lawn/green areas are proposed to be carried over.

Decision of the Committee in today’s meeting: - The scope of up-gradation of the said garden was examined by the Committee. It was noted that no new construction or structure or ecoflex is proposed. The scope of proposed works was found to be approvable from heritage point of view. The Committee therefore decided to grant its NOC purely from

Page 23 of 26 heritage point of view for the said development works in P. T. Mane garden subject to obtaining all other applicable permissions from concerned depts. It was however noted by the Committee that there are a few existing structures / sheds at south-west part within the said garden area, authenticity of which was not known to the applicant. As the said garden is a Recreational Ground (R.G.) as per D.P., the Committee was of opinion that maximum area should be utilized as garden / R.G. The Committee advised that concerned dept. should examine and confirm the authenticity of the said existing structures within the garden.

3. Case No. :597 / 2017 Sr. No.: 16/155 Grade II-A

‘S.K.Patil Udyan’ Subject: - Proposed development of S.K.Patil Udyan on plot bearing C.S.No.475 Bhuleshwar Division, Maharshi Karve Road, ‘C’ Ward, Mumbai. Applicant: - Dy.M.A.(Garden Cell) Ref: - 1) Application from Dy.M.A.(Garden Cell) Dtd.22.06.2017 ,14.07.2017 & 10.11.2017. 2) MHCC Meeting Dtd.08.08.2017 & remarks u/no.CHE/11006/DPC Dtd.12.09.2017. This is an old proposal of beautification / additions / alterations at part portion of S.K.Patil Udyan which is included as a Grade – IIA site in the published heritage list of 2012 under Sr.No.16/155. Earlier Consideration :- The proposal was considered by the MHCC in its meeting held on 08.08.2017. The Dy.Ch.Eng. (DP) II had then advised the applicant to take cognizance of the circular of the M.C. with regards to the permissible development in an R.G. and revised the plans accordingly. Revised Plans & Scope of Work :- The Dy. M.A.(Garden Cell), by a letter received on 10.11.2017 has submitted the remarks of Dy.Ch.Eng.(DP) – I dtd.16.10.2017 informing that the land bearing C.S.No.475 of Bhuleshwar Divison i.e. S.K.Patil Udyan, designated as R.G. can only be developed for ancillary use up to 15 % on 10 % of land for amenity. The Dy.M.A.(Garden Cell) has therefore submitted plans for the following scope of work. 1) Construction of ancillary structure like a toilet block adjacent to existing hall structure to be repaired and renovated. 2) Providing gazebo in two places by demolishing existing fountains. 3) Stamped concrete for the pathways. 4) Proposed new pathway (two meter wide) connecting the existing pathways on the south side.

Page 24 of 26

5) Provision of garden benches. 6) Proposed vermin compost PIT. 7) Bamboo plantation around the compound wall from inside on the North – East side. 8) Repairs to existing amphitheatre. 9) Providing additional entrance gate on the North side. 10) Repairs to existing statue and pedestal. 11) Painting to the compound wall. 12) Provision of Ecoflex has been cancelled and apparatus will be installed on lawn surface. 13) Hardwood surface will be used for skating rink instead of concrete floor.

Decision of the Committee in today’s meeting: - The revised / modified plans were examined by the Committee vis-à-vis previous recommendations of the Committee. It was informed by the applicant that ancillary structures in the garden under reference are within 10 % of the plinth area as per the remarks of the DP Dept. the only additional work is the connecting 2 m wide pathway and a new toilet block. The Committee found the proposed scope of work approvable from heritage point of view. It was therefore decided to grant the NOC purely from heritage point of view subject to obtaining all other applicable permissions from concerned authorities / depts.

4. Case No. :649 / 2017 Sr. No.: Nil Precinct

‘Toilets at Marine Drive Promenade’ Subject: - Proposed refurbishment of existing toilets at Marine Drive Promenade, Mumbai. Applicant: - Assistant Commissioner, ‘A’ Ward. Ref: - Meeting of Three Member Committee dated 15.11.2017.

The MHCC has not received any proposal in this matter and therefore this was considered only on request from the Assistant Commissioner, ‘A’ Ward. This proposal for refurbishment of existing toilet block at Marine Drive Promenade was considered by the Three Member Committee in its meeting earlier today and in-principle approval was granted subject to the MHCC NOC for the design of new toilet block being obtained. The Assistant Commissioner, ‘A’ Ward was directed to request and present the proposal to the MHCC accordingly. The proposal was considered with the permission of the chair.

Discussion of the MHCC in today’s meeting: - It was informed that the reconstruction of said toilets will be carried out more or less on same footprint of existing toilets. However,

Page 25 of 26 proper separation for male and female users considering privacy and proper facility for sewage disposal will be provided. It was also informed that the design of toilet would be in sympathy with the art deco character of the precinct. The said refurbishment proposal / new toilet designs including alternatives for external colour scheme was explained by the applicant and design consultant. Although the Committee found the proposed designs interesting, the members were of the opinion that the art-deco character of the precinct needs to be reflected more prominently so far as the façade treatment and elements was concerned. It was therefore suggested that the design consultant / architect may interact with Prof. Rajiv Mishra and revised design can then be presented to the Committee for its consideration and approval. It was however decided to grant in-principle consent for reconstruction of the said existing toilet block.

The meeting then concluded with a vote of thanks to the chair.

Sd/- Chairman Mumbai Heritage Conservation Committee

(Development Plan)

Page 26 of 26