In Other Words... the Cultural Dimension of Communication For

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

In Other Words... the Cultural Dimension of Communication For DOCUMENT RESUME ED 370 145 CS 508 573 AUTHOR Boeren, Ad TITLE In Other Words...The Cultural Dimension of Communication for Development. CESO Paperback No. 19. INSTITUTION Centre for the Study of Education in Developing Countries, The Hague (Netherlands). REPORT NO ISBN-90-6443-140-X PUB DATE 94 NOTE 219p. PUB TYPE Guides Non-Classroom Use (055) Information Analyses (070) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC09 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Cultural Context; *Culture; *Developing Nations; Developmental Programs; *Development Ccmmunication; Foreign Countries; *Intercultural Communication; Intercultural Programs; *Interpersonal Communication; Mass Media; Mass Media Role; Program Evaluation IDENTIFIERS Educational Media Role ABSTRACT Based on literature research and personal experiences gained in Africa, this book pays attention to the cultural and educational aspects of communication for development in developing countries. The book addresses the many pitfalls of communication and the factors that have an influence on the effectiveness of communication. The first part of the book provides an overview of the changes of development strategies in the last few decades and describes the practice of communication for development in the field. The second part of the book discusses the intricate link between communication and culture and the way it influences the practice of interpersonal and mediated communication. Part three deals with media and their educational potential. The fourth part of the book pays attention to the steps involved in the planning and implementation/production of communication events, programs, and materials. The fourth part of the book pays special attention to the importance of pre-testing, monitoring, and evaluation in this process. A 25-item dictionary of concepts and a bibliography containing about 200 items are attached. (RS) *********************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. *********************************************************************** 04. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Office ol Educational Research and improvement "PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE THIS EOU ATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY This document has teen reproduced as received frorn the person or organization originating it. kt_a_ _s C Minor changes have Peen made to improve reproduction quatity Points of view or opinions slated in this docu- meet do not necessarily represent official OERI position or policy TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC)." \ nem min MIMI &E g The task of the Centre for the Study of Education in Developing Countries (cEso), as its name implies, is to contribute to the study of the problems involved with education and development in the Third World. cEso also offers consulting services with respect to policy issues, field projects and the evaluation of educational training programmes. A specialized library offers extensive information about education in the Third World. CESO Kortenaerkade 11 P.O. Box 29777 2502 LT DEN HAAG The Netherlands Tel. (070)-4260291 Telegrams NUFFIC Telex 35361 nufic n1 Fax (070)-4260299 Language correction: Corry Donner, Athabasca Communications. C) 1994 Centre for the Study of Education in Developing Countries (cEso), The Hague. The author is responsible for the choice and presentation of the facts contained in this document and for the opinions expressed therein, which are not necessarily those of CESO and do not engage the responsibility of the organization. No part of this document may be reproduced in any form without permission from the publisher, except for the quotation of brief passages in criticism. CIP-GEGEVENS KONINKLIJKE BIBLIOTHEEK, DEN HAAG Boeren. Ad In other words... the cultural dimension of communication for development/Ad Boeren The Hague: Centre for the Study of Education in Developing Countries (cEso).(cEso paperback: no. 19) Met lit. opg. ISBN 90-6443-140-X Trefw.: communicatiemedia; Derde Were Id. CS CESO PAPERBACK NO.19 In other words... the cultural dimension of communication for development Ad Bocren 4 Acknowledgements I would like to dedicate this book to my late father, Sjef Boeren and to the late Marina Maspero, communication expert and gifted visual artist, with whom I had the privilege of working together in my first long-term assignment in Africa. Many people can be held responsible for my interest in anthropology and communication. I would like to single out a number of them. Two I would call the 'spiritual fathers' of my studies at Leiden University: Dr. Adrian Ger- brands, Emeritus Professor of Anthropology, who impressed upon his students the importance of audiovisual techniques in the study of material culture, and Dr. Dirk Nijland,lecturerinvisualcommunication, who introducedhis students to the theoretical dimensions of visual anthropology and drilled them in skills of audiovisual recording and reporting. The third is the late Hergé, creator of the famous comic strips on the adventures of Tin Tin. These stories unveiled, before the invasion of television, a world of fascinating places and cultures to young readers like me. Then there are a number of scholars who, in particular, have been a source of inspiration. They include Edmund Leach, Paulo Freire, Andreas Fuglesang, Marshall Singer and Arthur Asa Berger. I would like to thank the director of CESO. Prof. dr. Leo Dubbeldam for encouraging the staff of the centre to do research and publish. Finally, I wouldlike express my thankstoLisette van Hu 1st,Jan van Nieuwenhuijsen and Kees Epskamp for their willingness to comment on the draft of the manuscript and for their many useful remarks and suggestions. Contents Introduction 9 I. Development 15 I. Modernization and self-reliance 17 The key to progress and development 17 The alleviation of poverty 19 Problem solving and human development 21 Empowerment and self-management 21 Closing the circle 23 2. In the field and out of touch 25 Extension 26 Expectations 26 In the field 28 Improving the system 31 Out of touch 34 Different training 37 II.Communication and culture 39 3. About meaning 41 Common understanding 42 Information carriers 44 Non-verbal communication 44 Meaning 46 Context 48 The impossible model 51 4. Wishful thinking 53 Source 54 Receiver 57 Content 60 Coding and decoding 60 Objective 62 Medium 63 Format 64 Context 66 Location 68 Timing 72 Duration 73 5 6 Shared backgrounds 74 Summing it up 74 5. The influence of culture 77 Culture is confined to groups 77 Culture constructs reality 78 Patterns of thought are culturally determined 81 The structures of language and discourse 84 The power of values 86 Roles 92 Communication is culture 96 6. Visual perception 97 Cross-cultural studies on perception 98 Major findings 100 A literal view 101 Focus on details 103 Motion 104 Pictorial conventions 105 Drawing styles and picture quality 109 Colour and contrast I 1 1 Sequencing 112 Symbols and abstractions 113 Knowledge 114 Conventions in film 115 Better results 117 III. Media for development 119 7. The media and their educational potential 121 Classifying the media 122 Levels of conventionality in the media 125 Learning objectives 126 Educational potential of media 128 Advantages of a media mix 133 Lessons to keep in mind 135 8. The media in rural, development 137 Television 138 Radio 140 Audio cassettes 145 Film and video 148 Slides and filmstrips 153 6 7 Printed media 154 Traditional and popular media 159 Multi-media campaigns 163 Summing up 166 9. Choosing the right medium 167 Circumstances 167 Utilization 170 Familiarity 171 Costs 172 Choosing the right medium 174 Media and interpersonal communication 175 IV. Planning and evaluation 177 10.Communication planning 179 Determining the topic of communication 180 Determining the target audience 181 Baseline survey an..1 communication objectives 182 Specification of the communication activity 183 Inventory of infrastructure and communication resources 183 Selecting the appropriate communication support and media 184 Development of communication support and materials 184 Pre-testing of the proto-type 185 Production of the instructor's brochure 185 Training the field agents and instructors 185 Mass production and dissemination 187 Ongoing monitoring and evaluation 187 11.Pre-testing, monitoring and evaluation 189 Pre-testing 190 Process evaluation 195 Final evaluation 196 Impact evaluation 197 Concluding remarks 198 Epilogue 199 Dictionary of concepts 205 Bibliography 211 About the author 229 7 Introduction About a decade ago,I gave George May a ride, who, at that time, was a senior agricultural extension officer at the Nhlangano Farmer Training Centre in the South of Swaziland. When we were passing through the main street of Nhlangano he asked permission to lower the window. He had spotted some farmers from the area and wantedtotakethe opportunityto'extend' information to them. I did not have to reduce speed, as he would shout the message to them. So we travelled through the busy street while George May leaned out of the window loudly reminding the farmers that it was time to plant SR52, or something of that order. Later on, when Irecounted this experience to some of his colleagues,I was in for more surprising stories. They depicted George May as a powerful personality with an extraordinary and unique approach to extension. Gifted with an impressive posture and a powerful voice, he used to climb the highest hillin the area which he had picked for a field visit and shouted his extension message in all directions to the farmers working in the fields below. On days when the farmers came to the district town for shopping, he would position himself at the bus station, interrogating 'his' farmers before they entered the departing buses; he would ask them why they left without buying seeds or fertilizer as they had been advised to do (by him), and would send them off immediately to the nearest shop to rectify their 'negligence'. Despite this rather authoritarian approach, he was very much respected by the farmers. Maybe the fact that he was a leading figure in one of the many religious groups in the district was a contributing factor.
Recommended publications
  • The Machine-Gun Question: an Example of Conv'ersational Style *
    Journal of Pragmatics 5 (1981) 383 ·~-3 97 383 North-Holland Publishing COlnpany THE MACHINE-GUN QUESTION: AN EXAMPLE OF CONV'ERSATIONAL STYLE * DEBORAH TANNEN Scholars in many disciplines have written about style, a tenn Hymes (1974) aptly calls "protean". In a paper originally published in 1927, Sapir includes style as one of five levels of speech contributing "'to judgments of personality, defining it as "an everyday facet of speech that characterizes both the social group and the individual" (1958:542). Robin Lakoff (1979) follows Sapir in identifying speech style with what is popularly perceived as "personality". Ervin-Tripp (1972) places the study of style in the framework of theoretical linguistics. She discusses use of the term by Hymes, Geertz, and Labov, and suggests that linguistic choices are made on two levels. Syntagmatic relations, following rules of co-occurrence, result in idt1ntifiable styles. Paradigmatic relations, following rules of alternation, result in choices among styles and make possible style..switching, on the model of code..switching. Hymes (1974) builds on this work, noting that a speech community is comprised of a set of styles, and asserting that he uses the term in "the root sense of a way or n10de of doing something". Thus speech styles are simply "ways of speaking". He terms styles associated with specific situations registers, thus accounting for what is often thought of as formal vs. informal speech. The sense in which I shall use style is perhaps closest to Hymes' term varieties: "major speech styles associated with social groups". My use of style refers as well to no more nor less than a way of doing something.
    [Show full text]
  • Indirectness in Discourse: What Does It Do in Conversation?
    Intercultural Communication Studies III:1 1993 Sanae Tsuda Indirectness in Discourse: What Does It Do in Conversation? Sanae Tsuda Tokaigakuen Women's College Introduction This paper tries to explore the various aspects of indirectness in conversational discourse. In the beginning, the theoretical frameworks for the analysis of indirectness are explored by examining Grice's theory of conversational implicature and cooperative principles, Ervin Goffman's theory of face, the application of the idea of face to politeness by Brown and Levinson, and Deborah Tannen's theory of conversational style of message and metamessage. Secondly, different functions of indirectness in conversational interaction will be explored in the light of these analyses. In particular, avoidance of confrontation, manipulation of information, joking, and understatement will be examined as manifestations of violations of Grice's cooperative principles. Cultural differences of indirectness will also be explored. I. Theoretical Frameworks for Indirectness in Conversation 1. Conversational Implicature According to Grice (1975), conversational implicature plays an important role in our personal interactions. In conversation, we usually understand what others are saying even when people do not express their intentions straightforwardly. Grice provides a theory which explains how we correctly interpret what others are implying by universal conventions in human interaction which are called cooperative principles. These 63 Intercultural Communication Studies III:1 1993 Sanae
    [Show full text]
  • The Handbook of Discourse Analysis
    The Handbook of Discourse Analysis Edited by Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen, and Heidi E. Hamilton The Handbook of Discourse Analysis Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics This outstanding multi-volume series covers all the major subdisciplines within linguistics today and, when complete, will offer a comprehensive survey of linguistics as a whole. Published Works: The Handbook of Child Language Edited by Paul Fletcher and Brian MacWhinney The Handbook of Phonological Theory Edited by John Goldsmith The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory Edited by Shalom Lappin The Handbook of Sociolinguistics Edited by Florian Coulmas The Handbook of Phonetic Sciences Edited by William Hardcastle and John Laver The Handbook of Morphology Edited by Andrew Spencer and Arnold Zwicky The Handbook of Japanese Linguistics Edited by Natsuko Tsujimura The Handbook of Linguistics Edited by Mark Aronoff and Janie Rees-Miller The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory Edited by Mark Baltin and Chris Collins The Handbook of Discourse Analysis Edited by Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen, and Heidi E. Hamilton The Handbook of Variation and Change Edited by J. K. Chambers, Peter Trudgill, and Natalie Schilling-Estes The Handbook of Discourse Analysis Edited by Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen, and Heidi E. Hamilton Copyright © Blackwell Publishers Ltd 2001 First published 2001 2 4 6 8 10 9 7 5 3 1 Blackwell Publishers Inc. 350 Main Street Malden, Massachusetts 02148 USA Blackwell Publishers Ltd 108 Cowley Road Oxford OX4 1JF UK All rights reserved. Except for the quotation of short passages for the purposes of criticism and review, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnicity As Conversational Style* (-
    ,/ Indirectness in Discourse: Ethnicity as Conversational Style* (- ..... ~... "~ tJ _ i S CO u rs..€ i race$<"" t ~ ~'. ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ u _ t'J 1- '? - I." 9 / • f ./ "' <::---"--. ~o /-. f ~ l DEBORAH TANNEN Georg~town University This paper focuses on indirectness in discourse 85 a feature of convcfl\ational style. Reported researcb emphasizes social differences in elpcctations ofindirectness in the contexl ofconver­ Alion between married partners. To discover patterns of interpretation, findings are drawn from (I) interviews with Greeks and Americans about their interactional experience and (2) a pilot study consisting of a ques­ tionnaire based on • conversation reported in (I) and including (a) paraphra~ choices (b) short answers and (c) open-ended interview/discussions with respondenls. Resuhs suggest that Greeks lie more likely 10 expect indirectness in the context pre~cnled, and IhaC Greck­ Americans who may not speak Greek bave retained the innuence of Greek communicalive strategies. Discussion of differences in interpretive strategies focuses on I) the discourse function of questions and 2) the significance of ellipsis, yielding a br~v;ly efftct. associated for Greeks with an ~nlhusUum constraint. 1"heoraical implicationS include an aUernalive 10 Bems(ein~5 hypothc~i5 about restricted and daborated codes, such that restriction and elabor3liun are nOl monolithic. Rather. groups differ with respect to which contexts, channels, and cues require elaboration. I once began a paper on misunderstandings due to differences in conversational style by referring to the following experience. While I was staying with a fa":lily on the island ofCrete, no maUer how early I awoke, nlY hostcs~ nlanagcd (0 have a plate of scrambled eggs waiting on the table for me by the (hnc I was up and dressed; and at dinner every evening, dessert included a pile of purple seeded grapes.
    [Show full text]
  • Conversational Strategy and Metastrategy in a Pragmatic Theory: the Example of Scenes from a Marriage*
    Conversational strategy and metastrategy in a pragmatic theory: The example of Scenes from a Marriage* ROBIN TOLMACH LAKOFF and DEBORAH TANNEN The question of artistic verisimilitude - the relationship between the representation and the reality - is one of the more intriguing issues in a theory of aesthetics. Until now, linguists have largely been isolated from this area of philosophical speculation because it seemed irrelevant to our interests and impervious to our methodology. But as we get more involved in the formal analysis of naturalistic conversations - through tape recordings or transcripts - we are struck, often, in a perverse way by their apparent unnaturalness, their difficulty in being understood. Com­ pared, say, with the dialog in a play or a novel, naturalistic conversation strikes us as not what we expected, not working by preconceived pattern. We would not claim that constructed dialog represents a reality lacking in transcripts, but rather that artificial dialog may represent an internal­ ized model or schema for the production ofconversation - a competence model that speakers have access to. If, then, we are interested in discovering the ideal model ofconversational strategy, there is much to be gained by looking at artificial conversation first, to see what these general, unconsciously-adhered-to assumptions are; and later returning to natural conversation to see how they may actually be exemplified in literal use. Thus, we are not claiming that the artificially-constructed dialog we are going to discuss literally represents natural conversation, but rather that one can inspect a different level of psychological reality and validity through the use of literary data, and in this paper we will illustrate how such work might responsibly be done.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 DEBORAH TANNEN Department of Linguistics Georgetown University
    DEBORAH TANNEN Department of Linguistics Georgetown University Washington, DC 20057 202/687-5910 Education Ph.D. Linguistics. University of California, Berkeley. 1979 M.A. Linguistics. University of California, Berkeley. 1976 M.A. English Literature. Wayne State University. 1970 B.A. English Literature. Harpur College. 1966 Diploma. Hunter College High School. New York, NY. 1962 Honorary Doctorates University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 2002 St. Mary's College, St. Mary's City, MD, 1998 Weber State University, Ogden, UT, 1997 St. Michael's College, Colchester, VT, 1996 Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY, 1993 Professional Positions University Professor, Department of Linguistics, Georgetown University, 1991-present 1989-1991: Professor, Department of Linguistics, Georgetown University 1985-1989: Associate Professor, Department of Linguistics, Georgetown University 1979-1985: Assistant Professor, Department of Linguistics, Georgetown University Visiting 2012-2013 Fellow, Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA June 1997 Faculty, 1997 Linguistic Institute, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 1992-1993 Fellow, Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences, Stanford, CA Spring 1992 Visiting Scholar, Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, NJ Fall 1991 McGraw Distinguished Lecturer, Council for the Humanities and Department of Anthropology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 1986-1987 Research Associate, Joint Program in Applied Anthropology, Teachers College, Columbia University,
    [Show full text]
  • Making Sense of Metaphors: Visuality, Aurality and the Reconfiguration of American Legal Discourse
    Pittsburgh University School of Law Scholarship@PITT LAW Articles Faculty Publications 1994 Making Sense of Metaphors: Visuality, Aurality and the Reconfiguration of American Legal Discourse Bernard J. Hibbitts University of Pittsburgh School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.pitt.edu/fac_articles Recommended Citation Bernard J. Hibbitts, Making Sense of Metaphors: Visuality, Aurality and the Reconfiguration of American Legal Discourse, 16 Cardozo Law Review 229 (1994). Available at: https://scholarship.law.pitt.edu/fac_articles/122 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Publications at Scholarship@PITT LAW. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@PITT LAW. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. ARTICLES MAKING SENSE OF METAPHORS: VISUALITY, AURALITY, AND THE RECONFIGURATION OF AMERICAN LEGAL DISCOURSE Bernard J.Hibbitts* TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION: "AN EAR FOR AN EYE" .................... 229 I. METAPHORS IN LIFE AND LAW ........................ 233 II. "MIRRORS OF JUSTICE": VISUALITY AND LEGAL D ISCOURSE ............................................. 238 A . Seeing Culture ..................................... 238 B. Visuality and Power ................................ 264 C. Law and the Phenomenology of Sight ............. 291 III. "FAIR HEARINGS": AURALITY AND THE NEW LEGAL LANGUAGE ............................................ 300 A. Hearing Culture ...................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Pragmatics of Cross-Cultural Communication1
    The Pragmatics of Cross-Cultural Communication1 DEBORAH TANNEN Georgetown University, Washington 1. INTRODUCTION The study of cross-cultural communication is a paradigm example of the insepar- Downloaded from ability of linguistic theory and application. Linguists study cross-cultural com- munication for its applied significance, which is enormous, given the heterogeneity of societies affected by global migrations and the increasingly cross-cultural nature of commerce, diplomacy, and personal relationships throughout the world. And we also study cross-cultural communication because it provides a discourse analog to the starred sentence in linguistic argumentation. By examining interactions in which http://applij.oxfordjournals.org/ habits and expectations about how to show what is meant by what is said are not shared, we can see semantic processes—how language means—which are harder to observe in the seamless surface of successful communication. I will illustrate the range of aspects of communication that can vary from culture to culture by discussing and exemplifying eight levels of differences in sig- nalling how speakers mean what they say. These aspects of ways of speaking are not extra-linguistic nor even paralinguistic but are the essence of language. Just as physicists understand the nature of physical elements by observing their behavior in various environments and in interaction with other elements, so we at University of South Carolina - Columbia on September 4, 2012 come to understand the nature of language by observing it in communication and in contact with other systems of communication. In analysing the pragmatics of cross-cultural communication, we are analysing language itself. 2. LEVELS OF COMMUNICATION DIFFERENCES What is it that can be culturally relative in communication? The answer is, just about everything—all the aspects of what to say and how to say it.
    [Show full text]
  • Outline of Communication
    Outline of communication The following outline is provided as an overview of and 2.1.2 Types of communication by mode topical guide to communication: • Conversation Communication – purposeful activity of exchanging in- formation and meaning across space and time using vari- • Mail ous technical or natural means, whichever is available or preferred. Communication requires a sender, a message, • Mass media a medium and a recipient, although the receiver does not • Book have to be present or aware of the sender’s intent to com- municate at the time of communication; thus communi- • Film cation can occur across vast distances in time and space. • Journalism • News media • Newspaper 1 Essence of communication • Technical writing • Video • Communication theory • Telecommunication (outline) • Development communication • Morse Code • Information • Radio • Telephone • Information theory • Television • Semiotics • Internet • Verbal communication 2 Branches of communication • Writing 2.1 Types of communication 2.2 Fields of communication 2.1.1 Types of communication by scope • Communication studies • Cognitive linguistics • Computer-mediated communication • Conversation analysis • Health communication • Crisis communication • Intercultural communication • Discourse analysis • International communication • Environmental communication • • Interpersonal communication Interpersonal communication • Linguistics • Intrapersonal communication • Mass communication • Mass communication • Mediated cross-border communication • Nonverbal communication • Organizational
    [Show full text]
  • You Just Don't Understand
    You Just Don't Understand 1 You Jus Don't UNDERSTAND By: Deborah Tannen, Ph.D. Synopsis: Deborah Tannen uses telling examples to stunningly demonstrate how even in the closest of relationships women and men live in different worlds made of different words. The deft way she elucidates how our complex verbal give and take works or does not work and shows how the sexes can unravel their tangled language has made You Just Don't Understand a cultural phenomenon and has kept it on the New York Times best seller list for over 4 years. Also by Deborah Tannen: That's Not what I Meant Scholarly Books: Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse Conversational Style: Analyzing Talk Among Friends Lilika Nakos Linguistics in Context: Connecting Observation and Understanding (Editor) Languages and Linguistics: The Interdependence of Theory, Data, and Application (Co-Editor with James E. Alatis) Perspectives on Silence (Co-Editor with Muriel Saville-Troike) Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse (Editor) Spoken and Written Language: Exploring Orality and Literacy (Editor) Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk (Editor) 2 You Jus Don't UNDERSTAND Women and Men in Conversation Deborah Tannen, .). Ballantine Books New York Sale of this book without a front cover may be unauthorized. if this book is coverless, it may have been reported to the publisher as "unsold or destroyed" and neither the author nor the publisher may have received payment for it. Copyright 1990 by Deborah Tannen, Ph.D. All rights reserved under International and Pan-American Copyright Conventions. Published in the United States by Ballantine Books, a division of Random House, Inc., New York, and distributed in Canada by Random House of Canada Limited, Toronto.
    [Show full text]
  • Silence and the Construction of Reality
    Ethics and Information Technology (2007) 9:281–295 Ó Springer 2008 DOI 10.1007/s10676-007-9148-0 When Nightingales Break the Law: Silence and the Construction of Reality Sandra Braman Department of Communication, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 210 Johnston Hall, 2522 E. Hartford Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53211, USA E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. Strikingly, theorizing about digital technologies has led us to recognize many habitual subjects of research as figures against fields that are also worthy of study. Communication, for example, becomes visible only against the field of silence. Silence is critically important for the construction of reality – and the social construction of reality has a complement, the also necessary contemplative construction of reality. Silence is so sensitive and fragile that an inability to achieve it, or to get rid of it, or to correct the wrong kind of silence often provides early indicators of individual, group, communal, and society-wide stresses from information tech- nologies. Indeed, we might treat difficulties with silence as miners treated canaries in coal mines, as early warning signals. The story has already been told that nightingales in London now have to sing so loudly in order to be heard above the ambient noise that the birds are in danger of breaking the noise ordinance law. Surely something has gone awry if nightingales break the law when they sing. Finding ways to protect silence as an arena of personal and social choice is a particularly poignant, evocative, and instructive ethical and policy horizon at this frontier moment for the human species. This article introduces the theory of the contemplative construction of reality, explores what the study of silence tells us about reality construction processes, and outlines a research agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • Oral and Literate Strategies in Spoken and Written Narratives." Language 58(1982):1.1-21
    ORAL AND LITERATE STRATEGIES IN SPOKEN AND WRITTEN NARRATIVES DEBORAH TANNEN George/ou'" University Comparative analysis of spoken and written versions of a narrative demonstrates (I) that features which have been identified as characterizing oral discourse are also found in written discourse. and (2) that the written short story combines syntactic complexity expected in writing with features which create involvement expected in speaking. Quint- essentially literary devices (repetition of sounds and words, syntactic structures, and rhythm) are shared by written literary language and ordinary spontaneous conversation because both are typified by subjective knowing and by focus on interpersonal involve- ment. In contrast, expository prose and content-focused oral genres, such as lectures and instructions, may be typified by objective knowing and by focus on content.* Linguistic research too often focuses on one or another kind ofdata, without __ its. relationship to other kinds. In order to determine which texts are past and projected research, a perspective is needed on the kinds of language studied and their interrelationships. Moreover, as Lakoff 1981 observes, dis- course analysis needs a taxonomy of discourse types, and ways·of distinguish- ing among them. Through close comparative analysis of spoken and written versions of a narrative produced by the same person, two dimensions crucial to discourse types will be addressed here: (I) spoken vs. written modes, and (2) the rela- tionship between literary language. and the language of ordinary conversation. Following background discussion of related research, recent studies by Ochs 1979 and Chafe 1979a provide initial inventories of features associated with informal spoken and formal written discourse.
    [Show full text]