DOCSLIB.ORG

Retrieval-Based Learning: Active Retrieval Promotes Meaningful

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Retrieval-Based Learning: Active Retrieval Promotes Meaningful Current Directions in Psychological Science Retrieval-Based Learning: Active 21(3) 157 –163 © The Author(s) 2012 Reprints and permission: Retrieval Promotes Meaningful Learning sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/0963721412443552 http://cdps.sagepub.com Jeffrey D. Karpicke Purdue University Abstract Retrieval is the key process for understanding learning and for promoting learning, yet retrieval is not often granted the central role it deserves. Learning is typically identified with the encoding or construction of knowledge, and retrieval is considered merely the assessment of learning that occurred in a prior experience. The retrieval-based learning perspective outlined here is grounded in the fact that all expressions of knowledge involve retrieval and depend on the retrieval cues available in a given context. Further, every time a person retrieves knowledge, that knowledge is changed, because retrieving knowledge improves one’s ability to retrieve it again in the future. Practicing retrieval does not merely produce rote, transient learning; it produces meaningful, long-term learning. Yet retrieval practice is a tool many students lack metacognitive awareness of and do not use as often as they should. Active retrieval is an effective but undervalued strategy for promoting meaningful learning. Keywords retrieval processes, learning, education, metacognition, meaningful learning If you know something, or if you have stored informa- understanding learning, coupled with the importance of active tion about an event from the distant past, and never use retrieval for producing learning, is referred to as retrieval- that information, never think of it, your brain is func- based learning. tionally equivalent to that of an otherwise identical brain that does not “contain” that information. —Endel Tulving (1991) Learning Based on the Design of the Mind We often think of our minds as places in our heads, mental To understand learning, it is essential to understand the pro- spaces or containers where we store knowledge. Roediger cesses involved in retrieving and reconstructing knowledge. We (1980) noted that for centuries, most metaphors used to may think we know something, that our minds contain or pos- describe mental processes have characterized the mind as a sess some knowledge, but the only way to assess knowledge is physical space and knowledge as physical things in that by engaging in an act of retrieval. Differences in the ability to space—for example, by likening our minds to libraries filled recover knowledge may not stem from what is “stored” in our with books or cabinets loaded with files (see too Moscovitch, minds but rather from differences in the retrieval cues available 2007). In education, the metaphor of a physical building is in particular contexts. Given the fundamental importance of often used to describe the mind and knowledge. Knowledge is retrieval for understanding the process of learning, it is surpris- constructed by learners who actively build knowledge struc- ing that retrieval processes have not received more attention in tures; researchers seek to understand the architecture of the educational research. Consider that over the past decade, many mind; and instructors aid students by providing scaffolding for influential National Research Council books on how people learning. learn have contained no mention of retrieval (National Research When minds are viewed as places for storing knowledge, it Council, 2000, 2005a, 2005b). is natural to focus attention on processes involved in It is essential to consider retrieval processes not only constructing new knowledge in storage. Educational research because they are central to understanding learning but also because the act of retrieval itself is a powerful tool for enhanc- Corresponding Author: ing learning. Moreover, active retrieval does not merely Jeffrey D. Karpicke, Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, produce rote, transient learning; it produces meaningful, long- 703 Third St., West Lafayette, IN 47907-2081 term learning. The idea that retrieval is the centerpiece for E-mail: [email protected] 158 Karpicke and instructional practices have placed a premium on identify- would you want to do next? You have three options: You can ing the best ways to encode knowledge and experiences. (a) go back and restudy either all of the material or parts of it, Retrieval processes, the processes involved in using available (b) try to recall the material without restudying afterward, or cues to actively reconstruct knowledge, have received less (c) do something else. Which would you choose? attention. There seems to be a tacit assumption that successful We (Karpicke, Butler, & Roediger, 2009) gave this ques- encoding or construction of knowledge, in itself, is sufficient tion to a large group of college students. Most students (57%) to ensure learning. said they would reread their notes or textbook, and 21% said Basic research on learning and memory, however, has they would do something else. Only 18% said they would emphasized that retrieval must be considered in any analysis attempt to recall material after reading it.1 The decision to of learning. In part, this is because people do not store static, repeatedly read makes sense if we identify learning with pro- exact copies of experiences that are reproduced verbatim at cesses of encoding and constructing knowledge and consider retrieval. Instead, knowledge is actively reconstructed on the retrieval to be only a way to assess prior learning. It stands to basis of the present context and available retrieval cues reason that more studying (i.e., more encoding and knowledge (Bartlett, 1932; Neisser, 1967; see too Moscovitch, 2007; construction) should produce more learning, whereas retrieval Roediger, 2000). The reconstructive nature of mind is revealed should measure learning but not produce it. in the systematic errors people make in retrieving knowledge, Would students be better off repeatedly reading than engag- errors that verbatim recording devices would not make. The ing in retrieval? We conducted an experiment with a design past never occurs again in its exact form, so a mental store- that mirrored the question asked in the survey (Roediger & house of copies of past experiences would be of little use. Karpicke, 2006b). Students read educational texts and recalled People instead have the ability to use the past to meet the them under one of three conditions. One group of students demands of the present by reconstructing knowledge rather spent time repeatedly studying a text in four study periods. A than reproducing it exactly. second group read a text in three study periods and then What people express when they reconstruct knowledge recalled it in one retrieval period (labeled SSSR), in which the depends on the retrieval cues available in a given context. Ulti- students wrote down as many ideas from the text as they could mately, knowledge reconstruction depends on the diagnostic recall. A third group read the text during one study period and value of cues, the degree to which cues help people recover then practiced recalling it during three consecutive repeated particular target information to the exclusion of competing retrieval periods. Students did not reread the text or receive candidates (Nairne, 2002; Raaijmakers & Shiffrin, 1981). We any feedback after any of the recall periods; they only prac- may wish to examine what a person has constructed or stored ticed actively retrieving material. in mind, but it is impossible to directly assess the contents of At the end of the learning phase, the students made a judg- storage, per se. We can only ever examine what a person ment of learning: a prediction of how well they would remem- reconstructs given the available cues and context (Roediger, ber the material in the future. Then, one week later, students 2000; Roediger & Guynn, 1996; Tulving & Pearlstone, 1966). recalled the material again to see how much they actually Thus, it is essential to consider retrieval processes in any anal- retained in the long term. ysis of learning. Figure 1b shows students’ judgments of learning. The more The second crucial reason retrieval is important for learn- times students repeatedly read the material, the better they ing is that learning is altered by the act of retrieval itself. Every believed they had learned it. However, Figure 1a shows that time a person retrieves knowledge, that knowledge is changed, students’ actual learning exhibited the opposite pattern. The because retrieving knowledge improves one’s ability to more times students practiced actively retrieving the material, retrieve it again in the future (Karpicke & Roediger, 2007, the better they retained it in the long term. Students spent the 2008; Karpicke & Zaromb, 2010). This is a feature of a func- same amount of time experiencing the material in all three tional learning and memory system. Our minds are sensitive to conditions, and students in the repeated-retrieval condition the likelihood that we will need knowledge at a future time, only recalled and did not restudy the text, yet active retrieval and if we retrieve something in the present, there is a good produced the best long-term retention (for further discussion chance we will need to recover it again. The process of retrieval of metacognitive awareness of the effects of retrieval practice, itself alters knowledge in anticipation of demands we may see Karpicke & Grimaldi, 2012). encounter in the future. Retrieval is therefore not only a tool Returning to the survey of student learning strategies for assessing learning but also a tool for enhancing learning (Karpicke et al., 2009), one might think the results would (Roediger & Karpicke, 2006a). change if we reworded the survey question. Namely, students might choose to engage in active retrieval if they could reread after attempting retrieval. In a second version of the survey, Repeated Retrieval Enhances we asked students the exact question described above, but Long-Term Learning changed option (b) to say, “try to recall the material, and then Imagine you are studying for an upcoming exam.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Undergraduate Thesis the Influence of Using Rote
    AN UNDERGRADUATE THESIS THE INFLUENCE OF USING ROTE LEARNING STRATEGY ON THE STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY MASTERY AT THE EIGHTH GRADERS OF SMPN 1 PUNGGUR IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR OF 2017/2018 By : AMALIA ROHMI Student Number: 13106507 Tarbiyah and Teacher Training Faculty English Education Department STATE INSTITUTE OF ISLAMIC STUDIES OF METRO 1439 H / 2017 M AN UNDERGRADUATE THESIS i THE INFLUENCE OF USING ROTE LEARNING STRATEGY ON THE STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY MASTERY AT THE EIGHTH GRADERS OF SMPN 1 PUNGGUR IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR OF 2017/2018 Presented as a Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Sarjana Pendidikan (S.Pd.) in English Education Department By : AMALIA ROHMI Student Number: 13106507 Tarbiyah and Teacher Training Faculty English Education Department Sponsor : Dra. Umi Yawisah, M.Hum. Co-Sponsor : Trisna Dinillah Harya, M.Pd. STATE INSTITUTE OF ISLAMIC STUDIES OF METRO 1439 H / 2017 M ii iii iv v vi THE INFLUENCE OF ROTE LEARNING STRATEGY ON THE STUDENTS’ VOCABULARY MASTERY AT THE EIGHTH GRADERS OF SMPN 1 PUNGGUR IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR OF 2017/2018 ABSTRACT By: AMALIA ROHMI The purpose of this research is to determine whether the use of rote learning strategy can improve students’ vocabulary mastery at the eighth graders of SMPN 1 Punggur in the Academic Year of 2017/2018. In this research, researcher gave test in the form of pre-test to determine students’ vocabulary mastery and a post-test to find out the result of students’ vocabulary mastery after treatment by using rote learning strategy. This research was conducted by using quantitative research. The subject of this research are 33 students at the eighth graders of SMPN 1 Punggur in the academic year of 2017/2018.
    [Show full text]
  • CHEP 2018 Proceedings Final.Pdf
    2018 CONFERENCE ON HIGHER EDUCATION PEDAGOGY PROCEEDINGS H o s t e d by t h e C e n t e r f o r E x c e l l e n c e i n Te a c h i n g a n d L e a r n i n g ( f o r m e rl y C I D E R ) 10th Annual Conference on Higher Education Pedagogy February 14-16, 2018 The Inn at Virginia Tech and Skelton Conference Center Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia Corporate Sponsors The Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning thanks all of the sponsors for their value of and commitment to higher education pedagogy. Conference on Higher Education Pedagogy 2018 ii Table of Contents Conversation Sessions ................................................................................................................. 1 Practice Sessions....................................................................................................................... 77 Research Sessions ................................................................................................................... 197 Poster Sessions........................................................................................................................ 253 CONVERSATION SESSIONS A CONVERSATION ON EXAMINING HIGH IMPACT PRACTICES LIKE REACTING TO THE PAST .................................. 2 AND ITS IMPACTS ON STUDENTS AND FACULTY THOMAS CHASE HAGOOD, UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA; C. EDWARD WATSON, ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES; NAOMI J. NORMAN, UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA; DAWN MCCORMACK A CONVERSATION: FROM BRICK AND MORTAR TO CYBER SPACE: ADDRESSING FEARS AND RESISTANCE
    [Show full text]
  • Active Learning Notetaking with Pizzazz!
    Active Learning Notetaking with pizzazz! Well..okay..maybe not pizzazz, but certainly more success Active vs Passive Learning Active Learning Passive Learning Listening, not just hearing Copy instructor’s Frequent review of words material Rote memory Taking responsibility for how much you Cramming for tests learn Lack of regular Asking questions review Making connections between concepts Why take notes? o Organized notes will help identify the core of important ideas in the lecture o A permanent record will help you to remember later o Lecture usually contains info not available elsewhere. o Lecture is where you learn what prof thinks is important - useful on exams! o Class assignments are usually given & explained in the lecture o The underlying organization & purpose of the lecture will become clear through note taking Notetaking from Lectures 1. Before the lecture begins: Do readings Preview previous notes Listen to the content not the delivery Listening well is a matter of paying close attention. Be prepared to be open-minded to what the lecturer may say even though you may disagree with it. Notetaking from Lectures 2. During the Lecture: Date & # each page Leave margins for later info Pick out main themes & outline in the intro Watch & listen for prof’s cues & organization of info recognize main ideas by signal words Highlight headings, subheadings & new words Jot down details or examples that support the main ideas Notetaking from Lectures Match note style to content: graphs, diagrams, charts, bullets, indents, Write down the point, not the exact words Use lecture summary to check if you’ve got the main ideas Incorporate your own knowledge Ask questions Notetaking from Lectures Cornell note taking system Outline Psychology example and English example Cornell Note- taking Features of Cornell Note-taking The Cornell Note-taking System is characterized by two features: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Study of Rehearsal and Loci Methods in Learning Vocabulary in EFL Context
    ISSN 1799-2591 Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol. 5, No. 7, pp. 1451-1457, July 2015 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0507.18 A Comparative Study of Rehearsal and Loci Methods in Learning Vocabulary in EFL Context Touran Ahour Department of English, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran Sepideh Berenji Department of Public and Basic Science, Osku Branch, Islamic Azad University, Osku, Iran Abstract—Effective learning in foreign language settings depends on acquiring a large number of vocabularies. This study intended to compare two vocabulary learning methods known as loci and rehearsal methods to find out which one leads to better retention and recalling of words. Employing a quasi-experimental research, 80 learners from two intact classes in Islamic Azad University, Osku Branch, Iran, were randomly selected as the experimental and control groups. For the purpose of vocabulary learning, the experimental group trained in loci method while rehearsal strategy training was used in the control group. At the end of each session of the treatment, multiple-choice vocabulary tests were used to measure whether the participants can recall the lexical items from their short-term memory. A delayed multiple-choice posttest of vocabulary was also used in order to compare vocabulary learning among two groups four weeks after the treatment. Implementing Independent Samples t-test, the results indicated that experimental group was better than control group in retention and recalling of lexical items in immediate posttest. It was also found that the loci method was more effective than rehearsal in permanency of lexical items in long term memory.
    [Show full text]
  • Marketing Applications of the Learning Process
    MARKETING APPLICATIONS OF THE LEARNING PROCESS Puiu Carmen University of Craiova, Faculty of Economy and Business Administration, Dr.Tr.Severin, str.Oituz nr.35, bl.2, sc.2, ap.3, email: [email protected], tel.0745087609 Abstract: Understanding consumer behaviour is an important task for marketers in their attempt to offer consumers greater satisfaction. Each individual consumer is influenced by his or her perceptions, motivations, learning, attitudes and personality. Learning refers to changes in a person’s behaviour caused by information and experience. Learning can occur through simple associations between a stimulus and a response, or as a result to a complex series of cognitive activities. There are two basic types of learning – conditioning (classical conditioning and instrumental conditioning) and cognitive learning Key words: classical conditioning, operant conditioning, cognitive learning, incidental learning, marketing wareout The learning process For an even more complete understanding of the mechanism behind the consumer’s behaviour, the variable known as the learning is of great importance. It is considered that learning is the base of the perception mechanism and of the consumer’s motivation to buy or not buy a certain product or service. The learning is essential for the process of consuming if we take into account the fact that the buying behaviour is a learnt behaviour. Learning may occur in situation of high involvement (when the consumer has reason to learn) or of low involvement (when the consumer is very poorly or not at all motivated to learn). Learning can represent a noticeable or unnoticeable change in a consumer’s behaviour due to the consequences of experience and it leads to the increase of the probability that a behavioural act to be repeated.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Teach Mathematics Third Edition Steven G
    How to Teach Mathematics Third Edition Steven G. Krantz How to Teach Mathematics Third Edition http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/mbk/089 How to Teach Mathematics Third Edition Steven G. Krantz Providence, Rhode Island 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 97D40, 97Q60, 97U20, 97U50, 97U70. Cover 4 author photograph courtesy of Steven G. Krantz. For additional information and updates on this book, visit www.ams.org/bookpages/mbk-89 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Krantz, Steven G. (Steven George), 1951- How to teach mathematics / Steven G. Krantz. –Third edition. pages cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-4704-2552-4 (alk. paper) 1. Mathematics–Study and teaching. I. Title. QA11.K776 2015 510.711—dc23 2015021663 Copying and reprinting. Individual readers of this publication, and nonprofit libraries acting for them, are permitted to make fair use of the material, such as to copy select pages for use in teaching or research. Permission is granted to quote brief passages from this publication in reviews, provided the customary acknowledgment of the source is given. Republication, systematic copying, or multiple reproduction of any material in this publication is permitted only under license from the American Mathematical Society. Permissions to reuse portions of AMS publication content are handled by Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. For more information, please visit: http://www.ams.org/rightslink. Send requests for translation rights and licensed reprints to [email protected]. Excluded from these provisions is material for which the author holds copyright. In such cases, requests for permission to reuse or reprint material should be addressed directly to the author(s).
    [Show full text]
  • PROBABILISTIC MODELS of LEARNING and MEMORY Working Memory & Episodic Memory
    PROBABILISTIC MODELS OF LEARNING AND MEMORY Working memory & episodic memory MÁTÉ LENGYEL Computational and Biological Learning Lab Department of Engineering University of Cambridge MULTIPLE INTERACTING MEMORY SYSTEMS Probabilistic models of learning and memory — Working memory and episodic memory CEU, Budapest, 22-26 June 2009 http://www.eng.cam.ac.uk/~m.lengyel 2 MULTIPLE INTERACTING MEMORY SYSTEMS ✓ ✓ ✓ Probabilistic models of learning and memory — Working memory and episodic memory CEU, Budapest, 22-26 June 2009 http://www.eng.cam.ac.uk/~m.lengyel 2 MULTIPLE INTERACTING MEMORY SYSTEMS ✓ ✓ ✓ Probabilistic models of learning and memory — Working memory and episodic memory CEU, Budapest, 22-26 June 2009 http://www.eng.cam.ac.uk/~m.lengyel 2 MULTIPLE INTERACTING MEMORY SYSTEMS ✓ ✓ ✓ Probabilistic models of learning and memory — Working memory and episodic memory CEU, Budapest, 22-26 June 2009 http://www.eng.cam.ac.uk/~m.lengyel 2 LONG TERM MEMORY → SHORT-TERM MEMORY Probabilistic models of learning and memory — Working memory and episodic memory CEU, Budapest, 22-26 June 2009 http://www.eng.cam.ac.uk/~m.lengyel 3 60 CHASE AND SIMON 24 60 CHASE AND SIMON 16 24 LONG TERM MEMORY → SHORT-TERM MEMORY 60 CHASE AND SIMON 16 24 16 I 2 3 4 5 b 7 TRIALS FIG. 1. Learning curves of the master ( M ), class A player (A), and beginner (B) for the middle-game and random middle-game positions. The brackets are standard errors on five positions. of their poorer ilrst-trial performance, had much more room for im- I 2 3 4 5 b 7 provement than did M; this difference disappears when the learning TRIALS curve reaches the level of M’s first-trial performance.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning to Dialogue: Towards a Critical Pedagogy for Public Finance and Accounting Management Practice
    Learning to Dialogue: Towards a Critical Pedagogy for Public Finance and Accounting Management Practice Dr Andrew Armitage Anglia Ruskin Unversity Journal of Finance and Management in Public Services. Volume 9 Number 2 1 Learning to Dialogue: Towards a critical pedagogy for public finance and accounting management practice Dr Andrew Armitage Abstract Critical accounting sees the world as socially constructed and intrinsically linked to organisational, social and political contexts. Whereas mainstream accounting historians study accounting history in terms of the progressive development of modern techniques and practices, a Foucauldian analysis challenges the very notion of its historical progress (Ryan et al, 2002). Hopwood (1987) in his comments concerning the archaeology of accounting systems has questioned the traditional notion of its historical progress showing how research into its practices has become ‘what it is not’. Miller and O’Leary (1987) have also discussed the ‘governable person’, showing how standard costing and budgeting are part of the complex social and organisational management practices that have developed to regulate individual action in the name of economic efficiency (Ryan et al, 2002). Further, the public finance and accountancy management professions have not adopted what might be termed a “critical stance” towards its practices, being trapped within a modernist target setting culture (Armitage and Keeble-Allen, 2009 and 2010). As such, I will discuss the context in which financial management and accountancy operates
    [Show full text]
  • Rice University a Thesis Submitted in Partial
    RICE UNIVERSITY Transfer of the Testing Effect: Just How Powerful Is It? by Gunes Avci A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE Doctor of Philosophy APPROVED, THESIS COMMITTEE: , A s· tant Professor, Chair Psychology ~wr.~1 Psychology Suzanne Kemmer, Associate Professor Linguistics HOUSTON, TX APRIL 2011 ABSTRACT Transfer of the testing effect: Just how powerful is it? by Gunes Avci Researchers have repeatedly showed that when students take a test on the studied materials, their retention of information increases on later exams. The memory gain produced by tests is called the testing effect. The testing effect has been demonstrated with different materials (e.g., word lists, prose), with different designs (e.g., within-subjects, between-subjects), with different age groups and with different settings (e.g., laboratory, classroom). This thesis offers a novel approach to the assessment of the testing effect: the transfer of the testing effect. Although research on the testing effect has been flourishing over the last decade, transfer of the effect has not been studied systematically. In this context, the transfer of the testing effect refers to whether a learner can utilize the memory gain produced by tests in different contexts. The present study examined the transfer of the testing effect in the temporal domain which refers to retention of the testing effect over a period of time (Experiment 1, Experiment 2, Experiment 3 and Experiment 4), the knowledge domain which refers to transfer of the testing effect across different levels of learning (Experiment 1, Experiment 2 and Experiment 3) and the modality domain which concerns how the format of the tests influence the testing effect (Experiment 4).
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of the Society for Accelerative Learning and Teaching, 1994. SPONS AGENCY Society for Accelerative Learning and Teaching, Inc
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 386 019 FL 022 834 TITLE Journal of the Society for Accelerative Learning and Teaching, 1994. SPONS AGENCY Society for Accelerative Learning and Teaching, Inc. REPORT NO ISSN-0273-2459 PUB DATE 94 NOTE 444p. AVAILABLE FROM SALT Journal, Learning Forum, 1725 So. Hill St., Oceanside, CA, 92054. PUB TYPE Collected Works Serials (022) JOURNAL CIT Journal of the Society for Accelerative Learning and Teaching; v19 n1-4 1994 EDRS PRICE MF01/PC18 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Acceleration (Education); Cultural Influences; Learning Processes; *Neurolinguistics; Second Language Learning; *Semiotics; *Suggestopedia; Teacher Education; Technical Institutes; Two Year Colleges ABSTRACT Two issues of this serial include the following articles: "Editorial Note for Semiotics Issue" (Pedro Portes); "Qualitative Postmodernism and the Nature of Teaching and Learning" (Gary Shank); "Instructional Prescriptions Can Be Hazardous to Your Pedagogy!" (Donald J. Cunningham, Bruce Allen Knight, and Kathy K. Watson); "Toward a Mutual Interplay Between Psychology and Semiotics" (Alfred Lang); "Semiotics and the Deconstruction of Conceptual Learning" (J. L. Lemke); "Effectiveness of Accederated Learning as a Tool to Facilitate a Maintenance Paradigm Shift" (Aaron B. Clevenson); "The Effectiveness of Suggestive Accelerative Learning Techniques Applied in Teaching Underprepared College Freshmen at a Two-Year Technical School" (Vera Ann Confer-Owens); "Video-Taped Instrue.ion Creates Listening and Visual Memory Integration for Higher Reading and Math Scores"
    [Show full text]
  • DOCUMENT RESUME ED 284 122 CG 020 055 AUTHOR Wang, Alvin Y. TITLE Searching for the Metamemory-Memory Connection. PUB DATE Mar 8
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 284 122 CG 020 055 AUTHOR Wang, Alvin Y. TITLE Searching for the Metamemory-Memory Connection. PUB DATE Mar 87 NOTE 15p.; Paper presented at the Annua. Southeastern Psychological Association (33rd, At 'nta, GA, March 25-28, 1987). PUB TYPE Reports - Research/Technical (143) -- Speeches/Conference Papers (150) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC01 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Cognitive Style; Encoding (Psychology); Grade 2; *Learning Strategies; *Memory; *Metacognition; *Paired Associate Learning; Primary Education; Reck. 1 (Psychology); *Rote Learning; *Young Children ABSTRACT A relationship has been hypothesized between metamemory (the self-knowledge of memory processes that an individual can verbalize) and actual memory performance. To explore this relationship, a study was conducted, in partial replication of earlier studies, using the strategy choice paradigm for paired-associate learning (PAL) on a metamemory questionnaire. Metamemory subtests were administered to second graders (NP266) at the beginning of each session. Three PAL trials followed with each list comprising 10 known pairs presented over one study-test trial. The first two trials familiarized subjects with an effective sentence elaboration strategy and an ineffective rote repetition strategy. In the third trial, Choice, subjects freely selected a learning strategy. The results revealed that Elaborators (N.:44) on the Choice-trial learned three times more material than did Repeaters (2,122). The metamemorial knowledge of Elaborators concerning the acquisition process was
    [Show full text]
  • Developmental Trends in the Metamemory-Memory Behavior Relationship: an Lntegrative Review*
    CHAPTER 3 Developmental Trends in the Metamemory-Memory Behavior Relationship: An lntegrative Review* Wolfgang Schneider lntroduction Since the beginning of the 1970s, increasing attention has been di­ rected toward the development of children's awareness of their own mem­ ory. This phenomenon has been termed metamemory by John Flavell (1971), who broadly defined it as the individual's potentially verbalizable knowledge concerning any aspect of inforrnation storage and retrieval. Whereas the interest in metamemory development has been growing rap­ idly since then, documenting the construct's general usefulness in a wide area of different memory situations, there are at least two critical points that deserve special consideration: (1) the conceptualization of the con­ struct and (2) its status as a predictor of actual memory behavior. While the latter is the topic of the present chapter and is discussed in more detail, we first concentrate on some problems related to the definition of meta­ memory. The first taxonomy of classes of memory knowledge was provided in the metamemoryinterview study by Kreutzer, Leonard, and Flavell (1975). •This manuscript was prepared during a stay at the Department of Psychology, Stan­ ford University, which was made possible by a grant from the Stiftung Volkswagenwerk, Hannover, Federal Republic of Germany. METACOGN!TIO , COGNIT IO , 57 Copyright © 1985 by Academic PTess AND HUMA PERFORMA CE All rights of reproduction in any form reserved. VOL. l ISBN 0-12-262301-0 58 Wolfgang Schneider Subsequently, Flavell and WeHman (1977) offered a more systematic and elaborated attempt to classify different types or contents of metamemory. Although alternative conceptualizations have been presented (see Chi, 1983), and more extended and general models of metacognition have been developed since (see FlaveH, 1978, 1979, 1981; Kluwe, 1982), the classifi­ cation scheme of FlaveH and WeHman has been used in the majority of empirical studies concerned with the development of metamemory.
    [Show full text]