DOCSLIB.ORG

2014-2015 Annual Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2014-2015 Annual Report Institute for Computational and Experimental Research in Mathematics Annual Report August 1, 2014 – July 31, 2015 Jill Pipher, Director Jeffrey Hoffstein, Consulting Associate Director Bjorn Sandstede, Associate Director Sergei Tabachnikov, Deputy Director Homer Walker, Deputy Director Ulrica Wilson, Associate Director for Diversity and Outreach 1 Table of Contents Mission ................................................................................................................................................ 5 Core Programs and Events ................................................................................................................... 5 Virtual Institute of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences (VI-MSS) ...................................................... 7 Participant Summaries by Program Type .............................................................................................. 9 ICERM Funded Participants ................................................................................................................................................... 9 All Participants (ICERM funded and Non-ICERM funded) .................................................................................... 10 All Speakers (ICERM funded and Non-ICERM funded) .......................................................................................... 12 All Postdocs (ICERM funded and Non-ICERM funded) ........................................................................................... 14 All Graduate Students (ICERM funded and Non-ICERM funded) ....................................................................... 16 Additional Participant Data ................................................................................................................................................ 18 Semester Program Length of Visits .................................................................................................................................. 18 Primary Field of Interest ....................................................................................................................................................... 18 Academic Breakdown ............................................................................................................................................................ 19 Applied Attendees VS Invited Attendees ........................................................................................................................ 19 All Semester Attendees US Based VS Foreign Based ................................................................................................. 20 All Semester Program Workshop Attendees US Based VS Foreign Based ...................................................... 20 All Topical Workshop Attendees US Based VS Foreign Based .............................................................................. 21 Semester Programs ............................................................................................................................ 21 Semester Program Process ................................................................................................................................................. 21 1. Solicitation of Proposals .................................................................................................................................................. 21 2. Proposal Selection .............................................................................................................................................................. 22 3. Selection of Long-term Visitors/Research Fellows ............................................................................................... 22 4. Offers to Research Fellows .............................................................................................................................................. 23 5. Semester Workshops .......................................................................................................................................................... 23 6. Application Process ............................................................................................................................................................ 23 7. Applicant Selection ............................................................................................................................................................. 23 Financial Decisions for Semester Programs ................................................................................................................ 23 Opening, “Middle” and Closing Events ........................................................................................................................... 23 2014-2015 Semester Programs ........................................................................................................... 25 Fall Semester 2014: High-dimensional Approximation ......................................................................................... 25 Workshop 1: Information-Based Complexity and Stochastic Computation ................................................... 25 Workshop 2: Approximation, Integration, and Optimization .............................................................................. 27 Workshop 3: Discrepancy Theory ..................................................................................................................................... 29 Fall 2014 Semester: Research Cluster ........................................................................................................................... 30 All Visitors to Fall 2014 Semester Program ................................................................................................................. 31 Spring Semester 2015: Phase Transitions and Emergent Properties .............................................................. 35 Workshop 2: Small Clusters, Polymer Vesicles and Unusual Minima ............................................................... 38 Workshop 3: Limit Shapes ................................................................................................................................................... 40 All Visitors to Spring 2015 Semester Program ........................................................................................................... 41 Topical Workshops ............................................................................................................................. 46 1. Solicitation of Topical Workshop Proposals ........................................................................................................... 46 2. Proposal Selection .............................................................................................................................................................. 46 3. Recommendation of Speakers ....................................................................................................................................... 46 4. Invitations to Speakers ..................................................................................................................................................... 46 5. Application Process ............................................................................................................................................................ 47 2 6. Applicant Selection ............................................................................................................................................................. 47 Financial Decisions for Topical Workshops ................................................................................................................ 47 Topical Workshops in 2014-2015 ........................................................................................................ 47 Topical Workshop 1: Computational Nonlinear Algebra ....................................................................................... 47 Topical Workshop 2: Challenges in 21st CenturY Experimental Mathematical Computation .............. 50 Topical Workshop 3: Combinatorial Link HomologY Theories, Braids, and Contact GeometrY .......... 52 Topical Workshop 4: IntegrabilitY and Cluster Algebras: GeometrY and Combinatorics ....................... 56 Topical Workshop 5: Mathematics of Data AnalYsis in CYbersecuritY ............................................................ 59 Topical Workshop 6: Mathematics of Lattices and CYbersecuritY .................................................................... 62 Topical Workshop 7: IntegrabilitY in Mechanics and GeometrY: TheorY and Computations ............... 66 VI-MSS International Workshops ....................................................................................................... 68 Computational TopologY and Data AnalYsis Workshop ........................................................................................ 68 VI-MSS International Research Visits 2014-2015 .................................................................................................... 69 Program Promotions .......................................................................................................................... 70 Organization/Infrastructure ............................................................................................................... 70 Board of Trustees (BOT) .....................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • After Ramanujan Left Us– a Stock-Taking Exercise S
    Ref: after-ramanujanls.tex Ver. Ref.: : 20200426a After Ramanujan left us– a stock-taking exercise S. Parthasarathy [email protected] 1 Remembering a giant This article is a sequel to my article on Ramanujan [14]. April 2020 will mark the death centenary of the legendary Indian mathe- matician – Srinivasa Ramanujan (22 December 1887 – 26 April 1920). There will be celebrations of course, but one way to honour Ramanujan would be to do some introspection and stock-taking. This is a short survey of notable achievements and contributions to mathematics by Indian institutions and by Indian mathematicians (born in India) and in the last hundred years since Ramanujan left us. It would be highly unfair to compare the achievements of an individual, Ramanujan, during his short life span (32 years), with the achievements of an entire nation over a century. We should also consider the context in which Ramanujan lived, and the most unfavourable and discouraging situation in which he grew up. We will still attempt a stock-taking, to record how far we have moved after Ramanujan left us. Note : The table below should not be used to compare the relative impor- tance or significance of the contributions listed there. It is impossible to list out the entire galaxy of mathematicians for a whole century. The table below may seem incomplete and may contain some inad- vertant errors. If you notice any major lacunae or omissions, or if you have any suggestions, please let me know at [email protected]. 1 April 1920 – April 2020 Year Name/instit. Topic Recognition 1 1949 Dattatreya Kaprekar constant, Ramchandra Kaprekar number Kaprekar [1] [2] 2 1968 P.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Roth's Theorem in the Primes
    Annals of Mathematics, 161 (2005), 1609–1636 Roth’s theorem in the primes By Ben Green* Abstract We show that any set containing a positive proportion of the primes con- tains a 3-term arithmetic progression. An important ingredient is a proof that the primes enjoy the so-called Hardy-Littlewood majorant property. We de- rive this by giving a new proof of a rather more general result of Bourgain which, because of a close analogy with a classical argument of Tomas and Stein from Euclidean harmonic analysis, might be called a restriction theorem for the primes. 1. Introduction Arguably the second most famous result of Klaus Roth is his 1953 upper bound [21] on r3(N), defined 17 years previously by Erd˝os and Tur´an to be the cardinality of the largest set A [N] containing no nontrivial 3-term arithmetic ⊆ progression (3AP). Roth was the first person to show that r3(N) = o(N). In fact, he proved the following quantitative version of this statement. Proposition 1.1 (Roth). r (N) N/ log log N. 3 " There was no improvement on this bound for nearly 40 years, until Heath- Brown [15] and Szemer´edi [22] proved that r N(log N) c for some small 3 " − positive constant c. Recently Bourgain [6] provided the best bound currently known. Proposition 1.2 (Bourgain). r (N) N (log log N/ log N)1/2. 3 " *The author is supported by a Fellowship of Trinity College, and for some of the pe- riod during which this work was carried out enjoyed the hospitality of Microsoft Research, Redmond WA and the Alfr´ed R´enyi Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Bu- dapest.
    [Show full text]
  • All That Math Portraits of Mathematicians As Young Researchers
    Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Oct 06, 2021 All that Math Portraits of mathematicians as young researchers Hansen, Vagn Lundsgaard Published in: EMS Newsletter Publication date: 2012 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link back to DTU Orbit Citation (APA): Hansen, V. L. (2012). All that Math: Portraits of mathematicians as young researchers. EMS Newsletter, (85), 61-62. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. NEWSLETTER OF THE EUROPEAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Editorial Obituary Feature Interview 6ecm Marco Brunella Alan Turing’s Centenary Endre Szemerédi p. 4 p. 29 p. 32 p. 39 September 2012 Issue 85 ISSN 1027-488X S E European M M Mathematical E S Society Applied Mathematics Journals from Cambridge journals.cambridge.org/pem journals.cambridge.org/ejm journals.cambridge.org/psp journals.cambridge.org/flm journals.cambridge.org/anz journals.cambridge.org/pes journals.cambridge.org/prm journals.cambridge.org/anu journals.cambridge.org/mtk Receive a free trial to the latest issue of each of our mathematics journals at journals.cambridge.org/maths Cambridge Press Applied Maths Advert_AW.indd 1 30/07/2012 12:11 Contents Editorial Team Editors-in-Chief Jorge Buescu (2009–2012) European (Book Reviews) Vicente Muñoz (2005–2012) Dep.
    [Show full text]
  • Klaus Friedrich Roth, 1925–2015 the Godfrey Argent Studio C
    e Bull. London Math. Soc. 50 (2018) 529–560 C 2017 Authors doi:10.1112/blms.12143 OBITUARY Klaus Friedrich Roth, 1925–2015 The Godfrey Argent Studio C Klaus Friedrich Roth, who died in Inverness on 10 November 2015 aged 90, made fundamental contributions to different areas of number theory, including diophantine approximation, the large sieve, irregularities of distribution and what is nowadays known as arithmetic combinatorics. He was the first British winner of the Fields Medal, awarded in 1958 for his solution in 1955 of the famous Siegel conjecture concerning approximation of algebraic numbers by rationals. He was elected a member of the London Mathematical Society on 17 May 1951, and received its De Morgan Medal in 1983. 1. Life and career Klaus Roth, son of Franz and Matilde (n´ee Liebrecht), was born on 29 October 1925, in the German city of Breslau, in Lower Silesia, Prussia, now Wroclaw in Poland. To escape from Nazism, he and his parents moved to England in 1933 and settled in London. He would recall that the flight from Berlin to London took eight hours and landed in Croydon. Franz, a solicitor by training, had suffered from gas poisoning during the First World War, and died a few years after their arrival in England. Roth studied at St Paul’s School between 1937 and 1943, during which time the school was relocated to Easthampstead Park, near Crowthorne in Berkshire, as part of the wartime evac- uation of London. There he excelled in mathematics and chess, and one master, Mr Dowswell, observed interestingly that he possessed complete intellectual honesty.
    [Show full text]
  • Program of the Sessions San Diego, California, January 9–12, 2013
    Program of the Sessions San Diego, California, January 9–12, 2013 AMS Short Course on Random Matrices, Part Monday, January 7 I MAA Short Course on Conceptual Climate Models, Part I 9:00 AM –3:45PM Room 4, Upper Level, San Diego Convention Center 8:30 AM –5:30PM Room 5B, Upper Level, San Diego Convention Center Organizer: Van Vu,YaleUniversity Organizers: Esther Widiasih,University of Arizona 8:00AM Registration outside Room 5A, SDCC Mary Lou Zeeman,Bowdoin upper level. College 9:00AM Random Matrices: The Universality James Walsh, Oberlin (5) phenomenon for Wigner ensemble. College Preliminary report. 7:30AM Registration outside Room 5A, SDCC Terence Tao, University of California Los upper level. Angles 8:30AM Zero-dimensional energy balance models. 10:45AM Universality of random matrices and (1) Hans Kaper, Georgetown University (6) Dyson Brownian Motion. Preliminary 10:30AM Hands-on Session: Dynamics of energy report. (2) balance models, I. Laszlo Erdos, LMU, Munich Anna Barry*, Institute for Math and Its Applications, and Samantha 2:30PM Free probability and Random matrices. Oestreicher*, University of Minnesota (7) Preliminary report. Alice Guionnet, Massachusetts Institute 2:00PM One-dimensional energy balance models. of Technology (3) Hans Kaper, Georgetown University 4:00PM Hands-on Session: Dynamics of energy NSF-EHR Grant Proposal Writing Workshop (4) balance models, II. Anna Barry*, Institute for Math and Its Applications, and Samantha 3:00 PM –6:00PM Marina Ballroom Oestreicher*, University of Minnesota F, 3rd Floor, Marriott The time limit for each AMS contributed paper in the sessions meeting will be found in Volume 34, Issue 1 of Abstracts is ten minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematical Sciences 2016
    Infosys Prize Mathematical Sciences 2016 Number theory is the branch Ancient civilizations developed intricate of mathematics that deals with methods of counting. Sumerians, Mayans properties of whole numbers or and Greeks all show evidence of elaborate positive integers. mathematical calculations. Akshay Venkatesh Professor, Department of Mathematics, Stanford University, USA • B.Sc. in Mathematics from The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia • Ph.D. in Mathematics from Princeton University, USA Numbers are Prof. Akshay Venkatesh is a very broad mathematician everything who has worked at the highest level in number theory, arithmetic geometry, topology, automorphic forms and Number theorists are particularly interested in ergodic theory. He is almost unique in his ability to fuse hyperbolic ‘tilings’. These ‘tiles’ carry a great deal of information that are significant in algebraic and analytic ideas to solve concrete and hard number theory. For example they are very problems in number theory. In addition, Venkatesh’s work on the interested in the characteristic frequencies of cohomology of arithmetic groups the tiles. These are the frequencies the tiles studies the shape of these tiles and would vibrate at, if they were used as drums. “I think there’s a lot of math in the world that’s not connects it with other areas of math. at university. Pure math is only one part of math but math is used in a lot of other subjects and I think that’s just as interesting. So learn as much as you can, about all the subjects around math and then see what strikes you as the most interesting.” Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • 2004 Research Fellows
    I Institute News 2004 Research Fellows On February 23, 2004, the Clay Mathematics Institute announced the appointment of four Research Fellows: Ciprian Manolescu and Maryam Mirzakhani of Harvard University, and András Vasy and Akshay Venkatesh of MIT. These outstanding mathematicians were selected for their research achievements and their potential to make signifi cant future contributions. Ci ian Man lescu 1 a nati e R mania is c m letin his h at Ha a ni Ciprian Manolescu pr o (b. 978), v of o , o p g P .D. rv rd U - versity under the direction of Peter B. Kronheimer. In his undergraduate thesis he gave an elegant new construction of Seiberg-Witten Floer homology, and in his Ph.D. thesis he gave a remarkable gluing formula for the Bauer-Furuta invariants of four-manifolds. His research interests span the areas of gauge theory, low-dimensional topology, symplectic geometry and algebraic topology. Manolescu will begin his four-year appointment as a Research Fellow at Princeton University beginning July 1, 2004. Maryam Mirzakhani Maryam Mirzakhani (b. 1977), a native of Iran, is completing her Ph.D. at Harvard under the direction of Curtis T. McMullen. In her thesis she showed how to compute the Weil- Petersson volume of the moduli space of bordered Riemann surfaces. Her research interests include Teichmuller theory, hyperbolic geometry, ergodic theory and symplectic geometry. As a high school student, Mirzakhani entered and won the International Mathematical Olympiad on two occasions (in 1994 and 1995). Mirzakhani will conduct her research at Princeton University at the start of her four-year appointment as a Research Fellow beginning July 1, 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematics People
    Mathematics People Akshay Venkatesh was born in New Delhi in 1981 but Venkatesh Awarded 2008 was raised in Perth, Australia. He showed his brillance in SASTRA Ramanujan Prize mathematics very early and was awarded the Woods Me- morial Prize in 1997, when he finished his undergraduate Akshay Venkatesh of Stanford University has been studies at the University of Western Australia. He did his awarded the 2008 SASTRA Ramanujan Prize. This annual doctoral studies at Princeton under Peter Sarnak, complet- prize is given for outstanding contributions to areas of ing his Ph.D. in 2002. He was C.L.E. Moore Instructor at the mathematics influenced by the Indian genius Srinivasa Massachusetts Institute of Technology for two years and Ramanujan. The age limit for the prize has been set at was selected as a Clay Research Fellow in 2004. He served thirty-two, because Ramanujan achieved so much in his as associate professor at the Courant Institute of Math- brief life of thirty-two years. The prize carries a cash award ematical Sciences at New York University and received the of US$10,000. Salem Prize and a Packard Fellowship in 2007. He is now professor of mathematics at Stanford University. The 2008 SASTRA Prize Citation reads as follows: “Ak- The 2008 SASTRA Ramanujan Prize Committee con- shay Venkatesh is awarded the 2008 SASTRA Ramanujan sisted of Krishnaswami Alladi (chair), Manjul Bhargava, Prize for his phenomenal contributions to a wide variety Bruce Berndt, Jonathan Borwein, Stephen Milne, Kannan of areas in mathematics, including number theory, auto- Soundararajan, and Michel Waldschmidt. Previous winners morphic forms, representation theory, locally symmetric of the SASTRA Ramanujan Prize are Manjul Bhargava and spaces, and ergodic theory, by himself and in collabora- Kannan Soundararajan (2005), Terence Tao (2006), and tion with several mathematicians.
    [Show full text]
  • EMS Newsletter September 2012 1 EMS Agenda EMS Executive Committee EMS Agenda
    NEWSLETTER OF THE EUROPEAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Editorial Obituary Feature Interview 6ecm Marco Brunella Alan Turing’s Centenary Endre Szemerédi p. 4 p. 29 p. 32 p. 39 September 2012 Issue 85 ISSN 1027-488X S E European M M Mathematical E S Society Applied Mathematics Journals from Cambridge journals.cambridge.org/pem journals.cambridge.org/ejm journals.cambridge.org/psp journals.cambridge.org/flm journals.cambridge.org/anz journals.cambridge.org/pes journals.cambridge.org/prm journals.cambridge.org/anu journals.cambridge.org/mtk Receive a free trial to the latest issue of each of our mathematics journals at journals.cambridge.org/maths Cambridge Press Applied Maths Advert_AW.indd 1 30/07/2012 12:11 Contents Editorial Team Editors-in-Chief Jorge Buescu (2009–2012) European (Book Reviews) Vicente Muñoz (2005–2012) Dep. Matemática, Faculdade Facultad de Matematicas de Ciências, Edifício C6, Universidad Complutense Piso 2 Campo Grande Mathematical de Madrid 1749-006 Lisboa, Portugal e-mail: [email protected] Plaza de Ciencias 3, 28040 Madrid, Spain Eva-Maria Feichtner e-mail: [email protected] (2012–2015) Society Department of Mathematics Lucia Di Vizio (2012–2016) Université de Versailles- University of Bremen St Quentin 28359 Bremen, Germany e-mail: [email protected] Laboratoire de Mathématiques Newsletter No. 85, September 2012 45 avenue des États-Unis Eva Miranda (2010–2013) 78035 Versailles cedex, France Departament de Matemàtica e-mail: [email protected] Aplicada I EMS Agenda .......................................................................................................................................................... 2 EPSEB, Edifici P Editorial – S. Jackowski ........................................................................................................................... 3 Associate Editors Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya Opening Ceremony of the 6ECM – M.
    [Show full text]
  • Roth's Orthogonal Function Method in Discrepancy Theory and Some
    Roth’s Orthogonal Function Method in Discrepancy Theory and Some New Connections Dmitriy Bilyk Abstract In this survey we give a comprehensive, but gentle introduction to the cir- cle of questions surrounding the classical problems of discrepancy theory, unified by the same approach originated in the work of Klaus Roth [85] and based on mul- tiparameter Haar (or other orthogonal) function expansions. Traditionally, the most important estimates of the discrepancy function were obtained using variations of this method. However, despite a large amount of work in this direction, the most im- portant questions in the subject remain wide open, even at the level of conjectures. The area, as well as the method, has enjoyed an outburst of activity due to the recent breakthrough improvement of the higher-dimensional discrepancy bounds and the revealed important connections between this subject and harmonic analysis, proba- bility (small deviation of the Brownian motion), and approximation theory (metric entropy of spaces with mixed smoothness). Without assuming any prior knowledge of the subject, we present the history and different manifestations of the method, its applications to related problems in various fields, and a detailed and intuitive outline of the latest higher-dimensional discrepancy estimate. 1 Introduction The subject and the structure of the present chapter is slightly unconventional. In- stead of building the exposition around the results from one area, united by a com- mon topic, we concentrate on problems from different fields which all share a com- mon method. The starting point of our discussion is one of the earliest results in discrepancy theory, Roth’s 1954 L2 bound of the discrepancy function in dimensions d ≥ 2 [85], as well as the tool employed to obtain this bound, which later evolved into a pow- Dmitriy Bilyk Department of Mathematics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208 USA e-mail: [email protected] 1 2 Dmitriy Bilyk erful orthogonal function method in discrepancy theory.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019-2020 Award #1440415 August 10, 2020
    Institute for Pure and Applied Mathematics, UCLA Annual Progress Report for 2019-2020 Award #1440415 August 10, 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................... 2 A. PARTICIPANT LIST ....................................................................................................................... 4 B. FINANCE SUPPORT LIST ............................................................................................................. 4 C. INCOME AND EXPENDITURE REPORT .................................................................................... 4 D. POSTDOCTORAL PLACEMENT LIST ........................................................................................ 5 E. MATH INSTITUTE DIRECTORS’ MEETING REPORT ............................................................. 6 F. PARTICIPANT SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... 20 G. POSTDOCTORAL PROGRAM SUMMARY............................................................................... 23 H. GRADUATE STUDENT PROGRAM SUMMARY ...................................................................... 24 I. UNDERGRADUATE STUDENT PROGRAM SUMMARY .......................................................... 25 J. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION .......................................................................................................... 25 K. PROGRAM CONSULTANT LIST ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Number-Theory Prodigy Among Winners of Coveted Maths Prize Fields Medals Awarded to Researchers in Number Theory, Geometry and Differential Equations
    NEWS IN FOCUS nature means these states are resistant to topological states. But in 2017, Andrei Bernevig, Bernevig and his colleagues also used their change, and thus stable to temperature fluctua- a physicist at Princeton University in New Jersey, method to create a new topological catalogue. tions and physical distortion — features that and Ashvin Vishwanath, at Harvard University His team used the Inorganic Crystal Structure could make them useful in devices. in Cambridge, Massachusetts, separately pio- Database, filtering its 184,270 materials to find Physicists have been investigating one class, neered approaches6,7 that speed up the process. 5,797 “high-quality” topological materials. The known as topological insulators, since the prop- The techniques use algorithms to sort materi- researchers plan to add the ability to check a erty was first seen experimentally in 2D in a thin als automatically into material’s topology, and certain related fea- sheet of mercury telluride4 in 2007 and in 3D in “It’s up to databases on the basis tures, to the popular Bilbao Crystallographic bismuth antimony a year later5. Topological insu- experimentalists of their chemistry and Server. A third group — including Vishwa- lators consist mostly of insulating material, yet to uncover properties that result nath — also found hundreds of topological their surfaces are great conductors. And because new exciting from symmetries in materials. currents on the surface can be controlled using physical their structure. The Experimentalists have their work cut out. magnetic fields, physicists think the materials phenomena.” symmetries can be Researchers will be able to comb the databases could find uses in energy-efficient ‘spintronic’ used to predict how to find new topological materials to explore.
    [Show full text]