DOCSLIB.ORG

Summary Sheet

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Summary Sheet 2015-16 Sportfishing Regulations 2015-16 Proposals – (Public Hearing) TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Summary Sheet .................................................................................................... 1 of 217 2015-16 Sport Fishing Rule Change Proposals with Summarized Public Testimony ............................................................................................................. 3 of 217 CR-102 ............................................................................................................... 27 of 217 Attachment A (purpose of the proposal and its anticipated effects, including any changes in existing rules and reasons supporting proposal) ....................... 29 of 217 WAC 220-56-510 Game fish possession limits and size limits ........................... 31 of 217 WAC 220-56-105 River mouth definitions ........................................................... 34 of 217 WAC 220-55-220 Two-pole endorsement .......................................................... 37 of 217 WAC 220-56-210 Fly fishing ............................................................................... 41 of 217 WAC 220-56-282 Sturgeon—Areas, seasons, limits and unlawful acts.............. 42 of 217 WAC 220-310-175 Freshwater exceptions to statewide rules—General rules ... 44 of 217 WAC 220-310-185 Freshwater exceptions to statewide rules—Southwest ........ 45 of 217 WAC 220-310-195 Freshwater exceptions to statewide rules—Eastside ........... 67 of 217 WAC 220-310-200 Freshwater exceptions to statewide rules—Columbia ........ 116 of 217 Columbia Basin Stream Strategy Tables Table Codes ..................................................................................................... 125 of 217 Region 1 North (Ferry, Stevens, and Pend Oreille counties) ...................... 127 of 217 Region 1 Middle (Adams, Grant, Lincoln, Pend Oreille, Spokane, Stevens, and Whitman counties) ............................................................................... 135 of 217 Region 1 Proposed Mandatory Retention of Hatchery Steelhead .............. 139 of 217 Region 1 South (Asotin, Columbia, Garfield, Walla Walla, and Whitman counties) ...................................................................................... 141 of 217 Region 2 Okanogan County Methow River ............................................... 151 of 217 Region 2 Okanogan County Okanogan River ............................................ 155 of 217 Region 2 Adams, Chelan, Douglas, and Grant counties ............................ 159 of 217 Region 2 Columbia River Mainstem ............................................................ 171 of 217 Region 3 Winter Whitefish Seasons Before and After Stream Strategy ...... 173 of 217 Region 3 Stream Strategy ........................................................................... 175 of 217 Region 5 Klickitat and Skamania counties .................................................. 183 of 217 Region 5 Columbia River Mainstem ............................................................ 189 of 217 Region 5 Proposed Mandatory Retention of Hatchery Steelhead ............... 193 of 217 Region 5 Clark, Cowlitz, Lewis, Pacific, Pierce, Skamania and Wahkiakum counties .................................................................................. 195 of 217 12-03-14 Summary Meeting dates: Dec 12-13, Commission Meeting Agenda item: Sportfishing Regulations 2015-16—(Briefing/Public Hearing) Presenter(s): Craig Burley, Fish Management Division Manager, Fish Program Chris Donley, Inland Fish Program Manager, Fish Program Jeff Korth, Region 2 Program Manager, Fish Program John Easterbrooks, Region 3 Program Manager, Fish Program John Weinheimer for Cindy Le Fleur, Region 5 Program Manager, Fish Program Background summary: In April 2014 the Commission approved a three year rotating rule cycle where staff and public propose conservation and significant recreation rules that pertain to waters within the Columbia Basin the first year (2014), freshwaters of the Puget Sound and Coastal regions the second year (2015), and marine finfish, forage fish, and shellfish the third year (2016). The public was asked to submit rule proposals for the Columbia Basin during the month of May for the upcoming 2015-2016 sportfishing season(s). Proposals were posted online from August 12 through December 1 to receive written public comment. Policy issue(s) you are bringing to the Commission for consideration: Establish rules and regulations for the upcoming 2015-16 sportfishing season(s) to ensure conservation of the fish and shellfish resource, and provide sustainable recreational fishing opportunities. Public involvement process used and what you learned: A public news release, online notice through the department website, and an email to the regulation change email list in May notified people about the ability to submit rule proposals online. (Members of the public who were unable to submit proposals online were provided paper copies.) A public news release, online notice through our website, and an email to our regulation change email list in mid-August notified people of the opportunity to comment on sportfishing regulation proposals. Further, an email was sent to each member of the public that submitted a proposal to notify them of the status of their proposal and the ability to comment online. Department staff provided explanations for proposals that we recommend for further consideration and for proposals that were not recommend for further consideration. The end date for submitting written comments was December 1, 2014. Members of the public who were unable to view or comment online were provided paper copies of the recommended proposals and a form for comments. The comment forms were entered online by WDFW staff. In addition, public meetings (one per Columbia Basin region) were held to discuss the proposals and proposal process. One presentation was given to an advisor group. This meeting is the public hearing for the 2015-16 proposals. Action requested: NA-Briefing and Public Hearing Draft motion language: NA 1 of 217 Justification for Commission action: This action is justified under RCW 77.12.047. Communications Plan: The public (including people that submitted proposals) and our advisor groups were notified about the proposal submittal and proposal comment periods by e-mail, press release, and our website. The proposal comment period additionally included Columbia Basin regional public meetings. The department website provided instructions, associated documents, a timeline, and the ability to submit and comment on proposals. (Members of the public who were unable to view or comment on proposals online were provided paper copies.) Form revised 12/5/12 2 of 217 2015-2016 SPORT FISHING RULE CHANGE PROPOSALS December 3, 2014 3 of 217 TABLE OF CONTENTS SPORTFISHING RULE CHANGE PROPOSALS ..................................................................................................... 1 NOT REGION SPECIFIC/ BASIN WIDE ................................................................................................................... 1 # 1. TECHNICAL CHANGES........................................................................................................................................... 1 # 2. REMOVE INTERNAL COMBUSTION MOTORS PROHIBITION ON SMALL STREAMS.............................................. 2 # 3. BLACK FRIDAY TROUT OPENER ........................................................................................................................... 5 # 4. TENKARA FLY FISHING GEAR ............................................................................................................................... 5 # 5. STREAM STRATEGY FOR THE COLUMBIA BASIN ................................................................................................ 6 # 6. STATEWIDE GENERAL WALLEYE RULES............................................................................................................ 8 # 7. MODIFY SOME YEAR ROUND LAKES TO A MARCH 1 OPENER ............................................................................ 8 REGION 1...................................................................................................................................................................... 10 # 8. SNAKE RIVER STURGEON................................................................................................................................... 10 # 9. SPRING AND BLUE LAKES YEAR ROUND SEASON............................................................................................... 10 REGION 2...................................................................................................................................................................... 11 # 10. EXTEND FISHING OPPORTUNITY THROUGH THE MONTH OF OCTOBER ........................................................ 11 # 11. EASTERN BROOK TROUT LIMIT REMOVED...................................................................................................... 11 # 12. UPPER AND LOWER GREEN LAKES SEASON ADJUSTMENT............................................................................. 12 # 13. MOLSON LAKE DAILY LIMIT REDUCED FROM 5 TO 2 FISH............................................................................. 12 # 14. IMPLEMENT YEAR-ROUND SEASON AND STATEWIDE GENERAL RULES FOR SELECTED LAKES TO MANAGE FOR MIXED SPECIES POPULATIONS..........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Keystone State's Official Fishing and Boating Magazine PROTECT • CONSERVE • ENHANCE , RESOURCE FIRST CONSERVE 2000
    The Keystone State's Official Fishing and Boating Magazine PROTECT • CONSERVE • ENHANCE , RESOURCE FIRST CONSERVE 2000 The Fish and Boat Commission recently adopted a new strate­ to our resource stewardship activities. The Conserve 2000 pro­ gic plan entitled, "Enhancing Fishing and Boating in Penn­ gram provides this new mechanism. The Commission is op­ sylvania - Strategies for the 21st Century." I hope you took timistic that the program will be well-supported. Clearly, the opportunity to review and comment on the plan in its conservation of the Commonwealth's natural resources is im­ draft form. If you did not, the final printed version will be portant to all Pennsylvanians. As part of the Conserve 2000 available very soon. If you reviewed the plan, you undoubt­ effort, proceeds from sales of voluntary water conservation edly noticed that the cornerstone theme for the Commission stamps and related promotional and commemorative items in the 21st century is resource stewardship. This focus is not will be deposited in a restricted receipt account. These funds new for the Commission. We have long recognized that quality will be used exclusively to support Commission resource stew­ fishing and boating opportunities depend on clean water and ardship activities including watershed protection, manage­ effective conservation of the Commonwealth's aquatic re­ ment, and enhancement efforts. sources. Indeed, conservation has been the hallmark of Com­ The Commission's new strategic plan emphasizes cooperative mission programs since our founding in 1866 to address efforts as a key to achieving the Commission's mission and declining American shad runs in the state's waters.
    [Show full text]
  • 12December1993.Pdf
    Pennsylvania :v ?$* /5P JZ2 ( s. •w ,~ • • / Qaik Progress with Warmwater Fishing Programs Since the introduction of the trout/salmon Let me review the progress made in the stream and angler-opinion surveys. New state­ permit in 1991, the Commission has often past three years with these important areas. wide bass regulations were implemented in been asked, "What are you doing for • Warmwater habitat enhancement, 1992, and special lake regulations have been warmwater fishing since you received ex­ protection. The Commission has expanded placed on many waters to enhance fishing tra funds for trout and salmon programs'?" its Adopt-a-Stream program to include many opportunities with excellent results. Greater The answer is simple. The Commission lake habitat improvement projects during emphasis has been placed on reducing an­ has made significant progress in all state­ the past three years. We have developed gler mortality, balancing predator/prey popu­ wide warmwater fishing programs. new kinds of attraction devices and a spe­ lations and habitat preservation. A major Just as many people mistakenly believe cially equipped work boat to install devices walleye stocking survival project has been good trout fishing is totally dependent on in lakes in many areas of the Commonwealth. implemented across the state to determine the "Great White Fleet," some warmwater Nearly 2,300 structures have been placed the best fish size and habitat conditions for fishermen mistakenly believe the Commis­ in warmwater impoundments. successful stocking. sion can increase their warmwater fishing American shad restoration efforts have Introduction of paddlefish and sauger to success with the wave of a magic wand.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Red Lake 04-0035-01 BELTRAMI COUNTY
    Upper Red Lake 04-0035-01 BELTRAMI COUNTY Lake Water Quality Summary Upper Red Lake is located to the west of Waskish, MN in Beltrami County. The western half of the basin is located within the Red Lake Reservation. Upper and Lower Red Lake together is the largest inland water body in Minnesota. Upper Red Lake covers 119,274 acres and has a maximum depth of 15 feet (Table 1). Upper Red Lake has 41 inlets and one outlet, which classify it as a drainage lake (Figure 1). Water exits Upper Red Lake to Lower Red Lake and enters the Red Lake River, which flows west to the Red River. Water quality data have been collected on Upper Red Lake since 1990 (Tables 2-3). These data show that the lake is eutrophic (59), which is characteristic of dense aquatic plant growth and algae blooms in late summer. The Upper Red Lake walleye fishery is one of the most valuable resources to the local and state economy of all the lakes in Minnesota. Upper Red Lake is monitored extensively by the Red Lake Department of Natural Resources. This long-term data set is beneficial in future planning for this economically and ecologically valuable water resource. The Upper Red Lake Area Association is active in outreach, tourism promotion, and area events. Its mission is “To promote and enhance the Upper Red Lake Area, and the economic, commercial, and social interested of its inhabitants.” Table 1. Location data and physical characteristics for Upper Red Lake. Location Data Physical Characteristics MN Lake ID: 04-0035-01 Surface area (acres): 119,274 County: Beltrami % Littoral area: 100% Ecoregion: Northern Minnesota Wetlands Max depth (ft), (m): 15, 4.6 Major Drainage Basin: Upper/Lower Red Lake Inlets: 41 Latitude/Longitude: 48.131237 / -94.766452 Outlets: 1 Invasive Species: Starry stonewart Public Accesses: 2 Table 2.
    [Show full text]
  • PENNSYLVANIA December 1947
    PENNSYLVANIA December 1947 OFFICIAL STATE PUBLICATION VOL. XVI—NO. 12 DECEMBER, 1947 PUBLISHED MONTHLY BY THE PENNSYLVANIA FISH COMMISSION DIVISION OF JAMES H. DUFF Governor PUBLICITY and PUBLIC RELATIONS CHARLES A. FRENCH . Commissioner of Fisheries J. ALLEN BARRETT DIRECTOR .si. MEMBERS OF BOARD PENNSYLVANIA ANGLER CHARLES A. FRENCH, Chairman RICHARD F. WILLIAMSON ELLWOOD CITY EDITOR MILTON L. PEEK FRED E. STONE CIRCULATOR RADNOR South Office Building, Harrisburg, Pa. PAUL F. BITTENBENDER KINGSTON 10 Cents a Copy—50 Cents a Year COL. A. H. STACKPOLE Subscriptions should be addressed to the Circulator, PENNSYL­ VANIA ANGLER, South Office Building, Harrisburg, Pa. Submit DAUPHIN fee either by check or money order payable to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Stamps not acceptable. Individuals sending cash BERNARD HORNE do so at their own risk. PITTSBURGH * PENNSYLVANIA ANGLER welcomes contributions and photos of catches from its readers. Proper credit will be given to con­ WILLIAM D. BURK tributors. Send manuscripts and photos direct to the PENNSYL­ MELROSE PARK—PHILADELPHIA VANIA ANGLER, South Office Building, Harrisburg. CLIFFORD J. WELSH Entered as Second Class matter at the Post Office of Harris­ ERIE burg, Pa., under act of March 3, 1873. CHARLES A. MENSCH BELLEFONTE IMPORTANT! The ANGLER should be notified immediately of change in sub­ scriber's address. Send both old and new addresses to Board of H. R. STACKHOUSE Fish Commissioners, South Office Building, Harrisburg, Pa. Secretary to the Board Permission to reprint will be granted if proper credit is given. C. R. BULLER Chief Fish Culturist Publication Office: Tele graph P ess, Cameron and Kelker Streets Harrisburg Pa.
    [Show full text]
  • Walleye Fishing Guide
    AAnngglleerr’’ss GGuuiiddee ttoo WWaalllleeyyee FFiisshhiinngg iinn GGeeoorrggiiaa Georgia Department of Natural Resources, Wildlife Resources Division Fisheries Management Section February 2018 Walleye in Georgia Walleye is the most popular sport fish in the northern states and Canada, but it remains a relatively obscure species to most Georgia anglers. With expanding populations and an excellent reputation as table fare, walleyes are gaining the attention of increasing numbers of Georgia anglers. Walleye is a coolwater fish that is native to the Tennessee River and Coosa River Valley systems that flow through the heart of Fannin, Union, and Towns counties in northeast Georgia and in Dade, Walker and Catoosa counties in northwest Georgia. Rivers with Native American names like the Coosawattee, Conasauga, Etowah, Oostanaula, Toccoa, Nottely, and Hiwasee once contained native walleye populations. Native walleye declined in the state many years ago for a variety of reasons including loss of spawning habitat and overfishing. To rebuild and expand their distribution across North Georgia, a walleye stocking program was initiated in the 1960s. These early stockings were largely unsuccessful in all but a few mountain lakes; therefore, the walleye stocking program ceased in 1968. During the 1990s, declining numbers of walleye coupled with the rapid expansion of illegally introduced blueback herring sparked a renewed interest in re- establishing the walleye stocking program. In 2002, a fledgling walleye stocking program was reborn in Georgia. Today, eleven lakes receive annual stockings of walleye. These include lakes Seed, Rabun, Tugalo, Yonah and Hartwell in the Savannah River drainage, lakes Chatuge and Blue Ridge in the Tennessee Valley plus Lake Lanier, Carters Lake, and two lakes in the Rocky Mountain Public Fishing Area.
    [Show full text]
  • WALLEYE Stizostedion V
    FIR/S119 FAO Fisheries Synopsis No. 119 Stizostedion v. vitreum 1,70(14)015,01 SYNOPSIS OF BIOLOGICAL DATA ON THE WALLEYE Stizostedion v. vitreum (Mitchill 1818) A, F - O FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OFTHE UNID NP.TION3 FISHERIES SYNOR.9ES This series of documents, issued by FAO, CSI RO, I NP and NMFS, contains comprehensive reviews of present knowledge on species and stocks of aquatic organisms of present or potential economic interest. The Fishery Resources and Environment Division of FAO is responsible for the overall coordination of the series. The primary purpose of this series is to make existing information readily available to fishery scientists according to a standard pattern, and by so doing also to draw attention to gaps in knowledge. It is hoped 41E11 synopses in this series will be useful to other scientists initiating investigations of the species concerned or or rMaIeci onPs, as a means of exchange of knowledge among those already working on the species, and as the basis íoi study of fisheries resources. They will be brought up to date from time to time as further inform.'t:i available. The documents of this Series are issued under the following titles: Symbol FAO Fisheries Synopsis No. 9R/S CS1RO Fisheries Synopsis No. INP Sinopsis sobre la Pesca No. NMFS Fisheries Synopsis No. filMFR/S Synopses in these series are compiled according to a standard outline described in Fib/S1 Rev. 1 (1965). FAO, CSI RO, INP and NMFS are working to secure the cooperation of other organizations and of individual scientists in drafting synopses on species about which they have knowledge, and welcome offers of help in this task.
    [Show full text]
  • Boyd Lake FISH SURVEY and MANAGEMENT DATA Benjamin Swigle - Aquatic Biologist (Fort Collins/Boulder) [email protected] / 970-472-4364
    Boyd Lake FISH SURVEY AND MANAGEMENT DATA Benjamin Swigle - Aquatic Biologist (Fort Collins/Boulder) [email protected] / 970-472-4364 General Information: Serving as a state park, Boyd Lake (1700 acres) provides quality fishing for walleye, white bass, catfish, and trout. Anglers may additionally catch smallmouth bass, crappie, bluegill, and perch. The lake is open year round to fishing. Park website: http://cpw.state.co.us/placestogo/parks/BoydLake Location: Larimer County. At I-25 and US 34 (exit 257B) go W to Madison Ave. Go N 1 mile on Madison . Recreational Management: Colorado State Parks Purchase a Fishing License: https://www.co.wildlifelicense.com/start.php Fishery Management: Warmwater angling, seasonal trout. Amenities Previous Stocking Sportfishing Notes Boat Ramp 2021 Walleye Swim Beach Black Crappie Fish any rock structure when Modern Restrooms Bluegill water temps are 45-55°F. RV hook-ups Channel Catfish Later, fish are scattered but Tent Camping Largemouth Bass tube jigs, lindy rigs, triple Hiking Trails Rainbow Trout ripples, are good choices. Marina Saugeye Picnic Areas Walleye White Bass Ice Fishing Follow the birds! The white 2020 bass will be chasing shad! Regulations Black Crappie Use silver castmasters or Min. size for walleye and Channel Catfish another shad imitation. saugeye is 15” long, only 1 can Rainbow Trout Often attracted to flows when exceed 21”. Bag and Redear Sunfish the reservoir is filling possession limit is 5. (especially at 40-52°F). Min. size for largemouth and 2019 smallmouth bass is 15”. Black Crappie Largemouth Bass Statewide bag and possession Channel Catfish Bass fishing can be frustrating limits also apply.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Waste: Navigating Fisheries Byproducts in the Northeast
    Beyond Waste: Navigating Fisheries Byproducts in the Northeast 1 Beyond Waste: Navigating Fisheries Byproducts in the Northeast Written by: Susan Goldhor, Center for Regional Applied Studies Produced by: Elizabeth Sheehan, Coastal Enterprises, Inc. Funded by: Saltonstall-Kennedy Grant National Marine Fisheries Service and the Surdna Foundation Special Researcher on Asian Markets: Linda O’Dierno Graphic Designer: Tina Tarr Design Researcher / Editor: Bob Moore Photography: Salt Center for Documentary Studies This publication has been funded, in part, by a grant from the National Atmospheric and Oceanic Administration. The views expressed herein, are those of the authors and do not necessar- ily reflect the views of NOAA or any of its sub agencies. Front cover photo: Tommy Martin aboard the lobster boat, Sue-Anna-Jean, heading out to “The Southwest” near Cape Eliza- beth. Photograph by Heather Newell. 1998. © Salt Institute for Documentary Studies, Portland, Maine, 2000. Photo, left: The net of the groundfish trawler, Julie D., never stops collecting monkfish, haddock, hake, cod and flounder in the Gulf of Maine. Photograph by Tom McCall. 1995. © Salt Institute for Documentary Studies, Portland, Maine, 2000. 2 3 Introduction This book was written for northeastern sea- food processors wanting to utilize more of the raw materials entering their plants, and for those entrepreneurs interested in starting unconventional businesses based on seafood byproducts. There are three good reasons for a renewed interest dumpster constitute delicacies to these groups. While in byproducts at this time. First, fish stocks are down, we may not have enough of those parts to ship container Stormy seas make work aboard the 63 foot groundfish trawler, and it makes good sense to squeeze as much product loads to Asia or other regions, we do have enough to Julie D., all the more trying in the Gulf of Maine.
    [Show full text]
  • American Fisheries Society 142Nd Annual Meeting
    American Fisheries Society 142nd Annual Meeting Minneapolis - St. Paul, MN afs2012.org August 19 - 23, 2012 Thank You to our Generous Sponsors! One of our biggest challenges in preparing for the 2012 AFS meeting has been fundraising. Quite simply, conferences are expensive to host. Successful fundraising helps us lower conference registration costs, which encourages more people to attend. The AFS 2012 Committee is very thankful that the following companies, agencies, and individuals have decided to partner with us to host this wonderful opportunity to reconnect with old friends, make new friends, strengthen professional relation- ships, and share ideas. We couldn’t do it without their generous support! Muskie Level Friends Level Great Lakes Fishery Commission Iowa Chapter AFS US Fish and Wildlife Service McQuoid’s Inn in Isle Michigan Chapter AFS Lake Trout Level NOAA Grand Social Sponsors and Participants BANK Brewing Co. Walleye Level Indeed Brewing Co. Bureau of Land Management Lake Maid Brewing Lake Superior Brewing Lake Sturgeon Level Mille Lacs Reservation Advanced Telemetry Systems Red Lake Band of Chippewa Great Lakes Science Center Summit Brewing USGS South Shore Brewing Surly Brewing Co. Brook Trout Level Third Street Brew House Enbridge Energy Walleye Chop Beer Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Wirtz Beverage Minnesota Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community US National Park Service Smallmouth Bass Level Austen Cargill Minnesota Sea Grant Pure Fishing Red Lake Band of Chippewa Yellow Perch Level Florida Chapter AFS Great
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Spring Hearings Background Information DNR Rule Questions
    2021 Spring Hearings Background Information DNR Fisheries Management rule proposal questions and advisory question Wisconsin Conservation Congress advisory questions • In 2021, the Spring Hearings will be entirely virtual. The online public input questionnaire will open on April 12 at 7 p.m. and will close on April 15 (open 72 hours). The Spring Hearings questionnaire and background information will be posted at dnr.wi.gov, search “Spring Hearing.” Spring Hearings questionnaires will NOT be printed this year. • The majority of the DNR Fisheries Management questions are rule proposals, with one advisory question to gain additional input on a separate in-progress rule (Question 24). Spring Hearings rule questions occur in odd years, since the Legislature does not review administrative rules in even years. • Following the Spring Hearings, these proposals will be reviewed at the Conservation Congress statewide convention, adopted by the Natural Resources Board, signed by the Governor and reviewed by the legislative standing committees. Natural Resources Board meetings and any legislative hearings are additional opportunities for public input on these proposals. All Spring Hearings proposals are slated to go into effect in spring 2022, contingent upon review timelines. • The use of standardized toolbox regulations for the vast majority of these proposals help keep regulations consistent. • Questions and comments on DNR Fisheries questions may be sent to: [email protected]. DNR Rule Questions QUESTION 1: Walleye Ceded Territory
    [Show full text]
  • WALLEYE? Best Times
    Fishing Tips Of Note WHERE CAN I After dusk and before daybreak during late Walleye reach 18” in most lakes in 3 to 4 summer and fall are good times to fish. years. Fish less than 18” must be released CATCH A unharmed. Try crank baits & lures by trolling or casting. Anglers have recently caught walleye from If you prefer still fishing night crawlers, CONNECTICUT CT waters that weigh 11 to 13 pounds. shiners or alewives on a jig head are worth a try. Walleye have thinned forage fish populations Walleye can be caught through the ice using and improved growth rates of some panfish tip-ups with shiners. Dawn and dusk are the species. WALLEYE? best times. A Trophy Walleye in Connecticut is considered to be 5 pounds or 23 inches in length. For additional trophy fish designation Good Eats information visit Ginger Lime Walleye www.ct.gov/deep.fishing 1-2 pounds of filleted fish 3 Tablespoons of low salt soy sauce or scan this QR code 2 Teaspoons of fresh ground ginger 3 limes fresh squeezed For more information about walleye fishing Combine the above and let it rest in the refrigerator for ½ hour Lightly oil a 9”x9” glass baking dish with olive oil and put fillet contact a DEEP Inland Fisheries office near you skin side down. Pour sauce over the fish. Add water to the or your local tackle shop sauce (not over the fish) if you need to until the fluid is at least ¼” deep. Bake at 375 degrees for 18-20 minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • Worse Things Happen at Sea: the Welfare of Wild-Caught Fish
    [ “One of the sayings of the Holy Prophet Muhammad(s) tells us: ‘If you must kill, kill without torture’” (Animals in Islam, 2010) Worse things happen at sea: the welfare of wild-caught fish Alison Mood fishcount.org.uk 2010 Acknowledgments Many thanks to Phil Brooke and Heather Pickett for reviewing this document. Phil also helped to devise the strategy presented in this report and wrote the final chapter. Cover photo credit: OAR/National Undersea Research Program (NURP). National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/Dept of Commerce. 1 Contents Executive summary 4 Section 1: Introduction to fish welfare in commercial fishing 10 10 1 Introduction 2 Scope of this report 12 3 Fish are sentient beings 14 4 Summary of key welfare issues in commercial fishing 24 Section 2: Major fishing methods and their impact on animal welfare 25 25 5 Introduction to animal welfare aspects of fish capture 6 Trawling 26 7 Purse seining 32 8 Gill nets, tangle nets and trammel nets 40 9 Rod & line and hand line fishing 44 10 Trolling 47 11 Pole & line fishing 49 12 Long line fishing 52 13 Trapping 55 14 Harpooning 57 15 Use of live bait fish in fish capture 58 16 Summary of improving welfare during capture & landing 60 Section 3: Welfare of fish after capture 66 66 17 Processing of fish alive on landing 18 Introducing humane slaughter for wild-catch fish 68 Section 4: Reducing welfare impact by reducing numbers 70 70 19 How many fish are caught each year? 20 Reducing suffering by reducing numbers caught 73 Section 5: Towards more humane fishing 81 81 21 Better welfare improves fish quality 22 Key roles for improving welfare of wild-caught fish 84 23 Strategies for improving welfare of wild-caught fish 105 Glossary 108 Worse things happen at sea: the welfare of wild-caught fish 2 References 114 Appendix A 125 fishcount.org.uk 3 Executive summary Executive Summary 1 Introduction Perhaps the most inhumane practice of all is the use of small bait fish that are impaled alive on There is increasing scientific acceptance that fish hooks, as bait for fish such as tuna.
    [Show full text]