DOCSLIB.ORG

School Catering: the Place for Change? SUSAN C

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
School Catering: the Place for Change? SUSAN C Postgrad Med J: first published as 10.1136/pgmj.56.658.610 on 1 August 1980. Downloaded from Postgraduate Medical Journal (August 1980) 56, 610-612 School catering: the place for change? SUSAN C. COLLINS* S.R.D., M.H.C.I.M.A. ILEA Education Catering Branch Summary in 1906, but it was the 1944 Education Act which The 1944 Education Act marked the foundation of marked the foundation of the present School Meals the modern School Catering Service. A statutory Service. This Act imposes on LEAs a statutory duty is imposed on Local Education Authorities duty to provide school dinners for all maintained (LEAs) to provide a 'mid-day dinner... suitable in primary and secondary school pupils who want them. all respects as the main meal of the day'. LEAs are Since the Act was implemented there have been free to provide meals consistent with broad nutritional nutritional principles underlying school meals guidelines ofthe Department ofEducation and Science feeding. but financial pressures have a large bearing on this. The current Provision of Milk and Meals Regu- The traditional 2-course meal is still the norm, lations state: 'On every school day there shall be although there is a multi-choice menu for the majority provided... for every pupil as a mid-day dinner a of secondary schoolchildren. But a wide choice of food meal suitable in all respects as the main meal of is incompatible with closely prescribed nutritional the day' (Statutory Instrument, 1969). standards and pupils need to be aware of the implica- The Regulations do not specify what constitutes tions for their health in the choice of food. The a 'suitable mid-day meal' but in 1975 a Workingby copyright. adoption ofdietary recommendations for prevention of Party Report, 'Nutrition in Schools', was published coronary heart disease would not generate serious by the Department of Education and Science (DES, practical difficulties for the professional caterer. 1975). This provides the current documentation upon The technical problems arising from minor adapta- which the nutritional standards for school meals are tions in catering practice would be minimal in com- based and states: 'The average school meal... parison to those of cost, education and hence modi- should aim to provide at minimum one-third of the fication of consumer demand. The move away from recommended intake of energy, and between half nutritional standards is likely to accelerate if, owing and one-third (say 42%) of the recommended intake to financial constraints, the Government withdraws for protein' (DES, 1975, p. 12). 'A mixed diet of nutritional or removes the on animal and foods should all the guidelines obligation vegetable provide http://pmj.bmj.com/ LEAs to provide a catering service. The danger is that necessary nutrients...' (DES, 1975, p. 13). financial considerations will override those ofnutrition The Report recommends that the minimum and a unique opportunity for health education by amount offat to be provided by a school meal should guidance and example in the schools may be lost. no longer be specified, the implication being that fat should be restricted. The Working Party reported Origins and development of the School Meals Service that the possible relationship between consumption The Lancet precipitated an outcry in Parliament of saturated fat and the incidence of heart disease: in 1870 when it carried an article which argued: '. .. is widely discussed but has not been established. on October 1, 2021 by guest. Protected 'The Education system is not overworking children In view of the present uncertainty we do not feel but demonstrating that they are underfed.' (Evans, able to suggest that the use of animal fats should be 1974). This did not produce any legislation but it reduced on health grounds' (DES, 1975, p. 14). did excite various voluntary bodies into providing Sugar consumption is mentioned only in relation schoolchildren with something to eat. A typical to the effect on dental health: '... for many years week's menu was: Monday, jam pudding; Tuesday, sugar has been used sparingly in the preparation of thick meat soup; Wednesday, rhubarb pudding; the school dinner and the present recommended Thursday, roly-poly meat pudding; Friday, raisin quantity of half an ounce per meal is probably no pudding; each portion to be 0-5-0-75 lb (0-225-0-34 more than is necessary to make the meal appetizing. kg). We consider that this quantity should not on average The last 100 years have certainly witnessed change. be exceeded' (DES, 1975, p. 18). The first legislation relating to School Meals came There are no recommendations pertaining to the *The views expressed are the personal ones of the author, fibre or salt content of school meals. and not those of her organization. LEAs are free to plan meals within the limits of 0032-5473/80/0800-0610 $02.00 © 1980 The Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine Postgrad Med J: first published as 10.1136/pgmj.56.658.610 on 1 August 1980. Downloaded from School catering 611 the DES regulations. Reconciliation of nutritional before in the life of the School Meals Service. In standards with financial constraints requires skill those LEAs which decide to continue to provide and ingenuity on the part of the caterer. Although schoolchildren with a catering service, fundamental the charge for a school meal is 30p, the food allow- decisions will have to be taken. ance is, on average, 18p a head.* The result has been one of variety in the types of meal provided in Possibilities for the future different parts of the country. It is common for If the DES is to relinquish its responsibilities menus to be planned by individual Heads of towards school catering, LEAs will become depend- Kitchen in accordance with LEA policy. In a few ent entirely on local expertise and experience. There Authorities, menu planning and provisioning are is a well established, managerial staff of professional centralized and computerized, despite the associated caterers, the School Meals Organizers, who advise problems of inflexibility. Authorities and control the Heads of Kitchen. The It is generally accepted that choice meals are availability and quality of such expertise and experi- inappropriate for the very young. Most infant and ence varies, and consequently the emphasis attached nursery schools, therefore, are given 2-course set to the nutritional content of the fare provided. There menus. Junior schoolchildren are normally offered will be more opportunity than ever for health a limited choice of 2 main dishes and a salad meal, professionals, particularly District and Community 2 vegetables, potato or alternative, and 2 desserts. Dietitians, to offer sound, practical advice to their Multi-choice menus are offered in the majority of catering colleagues. This may not be easy, as indic- secondary schools and it is becoming increasingly ated by an opinion column in a recent edition of a common to find salad bars, snack items, and cash cateringjournal: 'Arguments over the need to ensure cafeteria systems. The aim is to provide the widest the correct content of the diet are falling on ears range consistent with financial limitations and good more attuned to the ringing of cash registers, as nutritional practice in the hope that children will Councils face bigger deficits brought about by school make sensible choices. meals subsidies. Besides, the validity of dietary by copyright. A free choice, albeit from a selection of controlled arguments is difficult to gauge when nutritionists items, is incompatible with the imposition of closely seem unable to agree among themselves on what is prescribed nutritional standards. This begs the good or bad for us' (Editorial, 1979). question-has the concept of nutritional standards This reinforces the author's concern about finan- for school means become out-dated? It is argued cial considerations dominating school catering-the that it has not, since to remove nutritional standards 'commercial approach'. Any successful catering would lead to financial considerations becoming operation must be financially viable but cost- overriding. This could be at the expense of any effectiveness and sound nutritional practice do not nutritional conscience in the feeding of 5 million have to be mutually exclusive. If, to some LEAs schoolchildren. Nutritional should not to then in the current climate parameters they appear conflict, http://pmj.bmj.com/ be ignored-at the very least there ought to be a financial considerations may outweigh those of moral constraint. nutrition. Some Authorities may merely hand over to contract caterers. Proposals for new legislation and potential influence Regrettably some nutritionally favoured com- on school catering modities are incompatible with prices the consumer The Government's recent financially based pro- is prepared to pay. Wholemeal breads and pastas posals for new legislation on school catering may are more expensive than white. Polyunsaturated abolish the statutory requirement for LEAs to margarines and cooking oils are more expensive on October 1, 2021 by guest. Protected provide a mid-day meal. Some Authorities may than saturated equivalents. Lean meats are more recognize the need for a School Catering Service- expensive than constituted products such as sausages and be prepared to pay for it. Others may not. and luncheon meat. Fresh fruit is, for much of the In order to give more freedom to those Authorities year, more expensive than the ingredients for which choose to maintain a catering service, the traditional puddings. This situation is a reflection new legislation may withdraw recommendations of lack of nutritional awareness leading to low which, since 1944, have laid down the nutritional demand, and hence relatively high prices. Consumer content of the meal. Ironically, it has always been demand has a controlling effect on the menus the nutritional standard, based on sound physio- compiled by the caterer.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Middle School Cafeteria Food Choice and Waste Prior to Implementation of Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act Changes in the National School Lunch Program
    Middle School Cafeteria Food Choice and Waste Prior to Implementation of Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act Changes in the National School Lunch Program Priscilla Connors, PhD, RD; Carolyn Bednar, PhD, RD ABSTRACT Purpose/Objectives The study objective was to document choices of entrées, vegetables, fruits, grains/breads, and beverages on lunch trays and to determine the amount of each that was discarded after mealtime. Methods A convenience sample of two urban middle school cafeterias in Texas participated in the study which took place in the 2010-2011 academic year. Digital photography was used to document student food choices on lunch trays as they exited the serving line and to record portions remaining prior to disposal. Ultimately 1,418 matched before and after tray images were uploaded to a digital library where three investigators used a standardized protocol to determine the amount of each meal component discarded. Results Meat and cheese-based entrées were popular and produced very little waste. Few students chose dark green or red-orange vegetables or legumes as a lunch item. Over half of the students who selected mashed potatoes, corn, raw carrots, beans (pinto, ranch-style, or green), fresh apples, or rice discarded half or more of the food item. A third of trays photographed contained no fruit, and canned fruit was chosen more frequently than fresh. Bread/grains typically appeared as part of an entrée and were a moderate source of waste with the exception of white rice. Skim chocolate milk was heavily favored over 1% white. Application to Child Nutrition Professionals Transitioning school meals to a greater reliance on vegetable subgroups other than starchy vegetables, increasing servings of fruits and vegetables, and adding more whole-grain rich foods is challenging.
    [Show full text]
  • Meals on Field Trips
    Meals on Field Trips School food service operations offer meals to students on field trips to maintain a steady revenue stream. Fewer student meals affects the funding schools receive in student payments, federal reimbursement, state match payment, and commodity allocations. This loss of revenue can add up over the course of the school year. In addition, it is difficult for school food service operations to appropriately adjust labor hours when there are occasional dips in participation, which may negatively affect productivity. Field trip meals are also a great convenience to busy parents. Here are some options for providing field trip meals: Option #1: Bagged Meals Provide a bag breakfast and/or lunch to accompany students on field trips. The meals may be claimed for reimbursement if planned and served in accordance with the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) meal pattern requirements (i.e. all minimums are met per age/grade group). Advantages • No need to make arrangements for meals when planning field trips • Cost savings when school meal is a lower-cost alternative to a meal purchased before, during or after the field trip • Students have an opportunity to receive a well-balanced meal • School nutrition service does not experience a loss in revenue or productivity • Teachers and other school staff have fewer concerns (such as students forgetting to bring meals or money, or wholesomeness of the food items brought from home) To implement the bag meal option, the following must be done: 1. Develop an ordering procedure to allow food service staff time to purchase, prepare and pack bag meals 2.
    [Show full text]
  • School Meals Are Essential for Student Health and Learning
    School Meals are Essential for Student Health and Learning ach day, millions of students fuel their minds and bodies with the good nutrition provided by the ENational School Lunch Program and School Breakfast Program. There is considerable evidence of the effective role that participation in these programs plays in alleviating food insecurity and poverty, and in providing the nutrients students need for growth, development, learning, and overall health, especially for the nation’s most vulnerable children and adolescents. This brief reviews the many benefits of the school meals programs, and summarizes the latest research on recent policy changes and innovative strategies that are increasing program access and improving student outcomes. or reduced-price school lunch.8 Conversely, research shows School Meals Play a Critical Role that rates of food insecurity and food insufficiency among in Student Health, Well-Being, and children are higher in the summer — a time when students Academic Success do not have access to the school meal programs available during the academic year.9,10,11 More than 14.6 million students eat a school breakfast and Nationally, school lunch also lifted 1.2 million people — 29.7 million students eat a school lunch on a typical school including 722,000 children — above the poverty line in 1 day, based on data from the 2018–2019 school year. The 2017, based on Census Bureau data on poverty and income vast majority of these students are low-income and receive in the U.S.12 a free or reduced-price meal. A considerable body of evidence shows that the School Meals Support Good Nutrition school meals programs are profoundly important for students, especially low-income students, with well- School meals support good nutrition throughout the school documented benefits.
    [Show full text]
  • School Meals Legislation and Funding by State Updated February 2021
    School Meals Legislation and Funding by State Updated February 2021 State State Mandate Requiring Some or States Providing Additional Funding for Other legislation addressing issues All Schools to Offer School Meal Programs such as unpaid school meal fees, School Breakfast and/or Lunch outreach programs and incentives for locally grown food Alabama None None None Alaska None None None Arizona All K–8 schools are required to None participate in the National School Lunch Program. A waiver may be granted for school districts with fewer than 100 students if the school board determines at a public meeting to not participate. The requirement does not apply to charter schools [ARIZ. REV. STAT. § 15-242]. Arkansas All schools located in a school district None School districts may use state education with 20 percent or more free and funding to the extent necessary to provide reduced-price certified students are school meals without charge to all students required to participate in the School in schools implementing Provision 2 and to Breakfast Program. [ARK. CODE ANN. provide school meals without charge to § 6-18-705]. students otherwise eligible for reduced-price meals under the National School Lunch Program and the School Breakfast Program [ARK. CODE ANN. § 6-20-2305]. School districts are prohibited from providing an alternate meal, preventing access to meals or snacks, or taking any action that would stigmatize a student that has unpaid meal fees. The Department of Education’s Child Nutrition Unit also is required to implement a system for State State Mandate Requiring Some or States Providing Additional Funding for Other legislation addressing issues All Schools to Offer School Meal Programs such as unpaid school meal fees, School Breakfast and/or Lunch outreach programs and incentives for locally grown food reviewing local unpaid meal practices, provide model policies that local districts can adopt, and share best practices for implementation [ARK.
    [Show full text]
  • The Promotions of Sustainable Lunch Meals in School Feeding Programs: the Case of Italy
    nutrients Article The Promotions of Sustainable Lunch Meals in School Feeding Programs: The Case of Italy Laura Rossi 1 , Marika Ferrari 1, Deborah Martone 1, Luca Benvenuti 2,* and Alberto De Santis 2 1 CREA Council for Agricultural Research and Economics—Research Centre for Food and Nutrition, Via Ardeatina 546, 00178 Rome, Italy; [email protected] (L.R.); [email protected] (M.F.); [email protected] (D.M.) 2 Department of Computer, Control and Management Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome-via Ariosto 25, 00185 Rome, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: School is considered a privileged environment for health education and school feeding represents an opportunity for promoting sustainable foods to young generations. The objective of this paper is to demonstrate that is possible to select, from existing school menus, recipes that combine healthy foods with low environmental impact. A national sample of Italian school menus was collected and a total number of 194 recipes were included on a database containing 70 first courses, 83 s courses, 39 side dishes, 1 portion of fruit, and 1 portion of bread. A mathematical model was conceived to combine nutritional adequacy and acceptability criteria while minimizing GHGs emissions. The result is a four-week menu characterized by large vegetable components that were used not only as side dishes but also as ingredients in the first and second courses. Legumes and pasta are often included, and white meat is selected instead of red meat. The findings presented in this Citation: Rossi, L.; Ferrari, M.; paper demonstrated that it is possible to design environmental-friendly meals from existing school Martone, D.; Benvenuti, L.; menus.
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Operating Procedures for Wellesley's School-Based Food
    Town of Wellesley, Massachusetts School-based Food Rescue Program Standard Operating Procedures and Agreement Agreement Authors: Whitsons Food Services – Matt Delaney Wellesley Director of Public Health – Leonard Izzo Wellesley Sustainable Energy Committee – Alison Cross, Marybeth Martello Partners Bates Elementary School principal – Toni Jolley Sprague Elementary School principal – Susan Snyder Fiske Elementary School principal – Rachel McGregor Wellesley Facilities Maintenance Department November 1, 2017 Date: May 12, 2017 1 Background School-based food rescue programs – which include the collection of food for donation, diversion of liquid waste, and composting of food waste – have experienced a ground swell of activity in the past decade. There are over 500 school communities nationwide participating in food rescue efforts registered on foodrescue.net; many of these are striving to become zero-waste communities. Although in many schools, students place their own lunch orders ahead of time, they do not always take all of the items offered to them as they pass through the cafeteria line. The food remaining at the end of the lunch period ranges in volume each day, but it is enough to make a difference to food pantries, soup kitchens and shelters who service food insecure populations (defined by the USDA and the World Health Organization as households unable to provide a sufficient quantity of affordable, nutritious food to their families). Public health officials are increasingly addressing the rising level of food insecurity in the U.S., as are those focused on environmental sustainability issues. The ultimate goal for Wellesley schools is to reduce food waste at the front end of the supply chain; to that end, Whitsons, our food services provider, has a highly tuned system for guiding food preparation.
    [Show full text]
  • Legume Love in School Meals
    Legume Love in School Meals Meeting Legume Vegetable requirements with a pulse (dry peas, lentils, chickpeas, & beans) © COPYRIGHT 2017 SCHOOL NUTRITION ASSOCIATION | #ANC17 | ATLANTA, GA Presenters • Jessie Hunter, MPH, RDN, Director of Domestic Marketing USA Dry Pea and Lentil Council and the American Pulse Association • Sharon Palmer, MS, RDN, The Plant-Powered Dietitian Plant- based Expert, Author, Blogger, Editor • Chef Brenda L. Thompson-Wattles, RDN Culinary Chef and Registered Dietitian, Area Manager at the Boise School District © COPYRIGHT 2017 SCHOOL NUTRITION ASSOCIATION | #ANC17 | ATLANTA, GA © COPYRIGHT 2017 SCHOOL NUTRITION ASSOCIATION | #ANC17 | ATLANTA, GA © COPYRIGHT 2017 SCHOOL NUTRITION ASSOCIATION | #ANC17 | ATLANTA, GA © COPYRIGHT 2017 SCHOOL NUTRITION ASSOCIATION | #ANC17 | ATLANTA, GA © COPYRIGHT 2017 SCHOOL NUTRITION ASSOCIATION | #ANC17 | ATLANTA, GA © COPYRIGHT 2017 SCHOOL NUTRITION ASSOCIATION | #ANC17 | ATLANTA, GA © COPYRIGHT 2017 SCHOOL NUTRITION ASSOCIATION | #ANC17 | ATLANTA, GA Dietary Guidelines Pulses are Unique! Fit into Vegetable OR Protein Legume Vegetable Subcategory: 1 ½ cups per week for 2000 Calorie diet Protein ¼ cup = 1 oz. meat equivalent © COPYRIGHT 2017 SCHOOL NUTRITION ASSOCIATION | #ANC17 | ATLANTA, GA Pulses in School Meals • Legume Subcategory: “ dry beans & peas” ( legumes) – ½ cup per week • Minimum serving size – 1/8 cup • Meat Alternate – “Beans and peas (legumes) cooked dry beans and peas may be used to meet all or part of the meat/meat alternates component.” • 1 oz.-meat-equivalent
    [Show full text]
  • USDA's School Kitchen Grants Benefit Meal Programs and Students
    A brief from The Pew Charitable Trusts and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation June 2016 USDA’s School Kitchen Grants Benefit Meal Programs and Students Federal funds help schools use more fresh ingredients and improve service The Pew Charitable Trusts Staff at Murrieta Mesa High School in California use a tilting skillet, purchased with a U.S. Department of Agriculture kitchen equipment grant, to prepare healthy, made-from-scratch entrees and side dishes. Overview The National School Lunch Program is turning 70 in 2016, and kitchens in many of the more than 95,000 schools that participate in the program are nearly as old. Aging infrastructure and equipment, much of it designed to heat or handle pre-packaged rather than fresh foods, pose significant barriers to school districts’ efforts to adapt to the preferences and dietary needs of today’s students. To address these challenges, Congress appropriated nearly $200 million over the past six years for U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) kitchen equipment grants, which have helped thousands of schools purchase needed upgrades. The Kids’ Safe and Healthful Foods Project—a joint initiative of The Pew Charitable Trusts and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation—commissioned a series of case studies to explore the effects of this federal funding on students and meal programs. Researchers interviewed food service directors, school administrators, and students from 19 schools in seven states during 2015, and visited the campuses to collect more information. This brief serves as a companion to the individual school case studies, providing background on the grant program and summarizing the findings of an analysis of trends across the schools studied.
    [Show full text]
  • Activities and Resources for Increasing School Meal Participation
    Activities and Resources for Increasing School Meal Participation The Maryland State Department of Education (MSDE) suggests the following ideas to help increase participation in school meals. “One school district in a nearby state served meals to nearly 80 percent of the students this past year. Student participation was achieved by asking students' opinions, monitoring food quality, redesigning menus, increasing staff morale, providing a pleasant cafeteria atmosphere, and sponsoring nutrition programs.” Ideas for Food Service Directors: Conduct a financial analysis of your operation. Share results of the financial analysis and providing training to staff. Meet with your managers to discuss: - concerns and current participation levels; and - future plans to generate higher participation numbers. Design goals and initial action steps to increase participation. Monitor outcomes of established goals. Ideas for individual schools: Engage parents, teachers, and administrators: Inform parents that Meal Benefit Applications can be filled out at any time during the school year! Make the forms easily accessible and confidential. Distribute “Rising Lunch Prices Fact Sheet for Parents” (can be turned into a letter for parents) and/ or “The Value of School Lunch Customizable Fact Sheet in Word.” These can be found at: http://www.schoolnutrition.org/Content.aspx?id=2398. Provide the value of school meals message to: parents, teachers, and school administrators by using: - emails and listservs, your school’s website, your school’s newsletter; mailings to parents; and attending school assemblies, PTA meetings, Back to School nights, parent events, school concerts. Invite teachers and administrators to eat school meals with the students. Incorporate schools meals in the classroom (art, writing, math, science, nutrition).
    [Show full text]
  • USDA School Meal Programs Face New Challenges (Pdf)
    3rd Quarter 2009 | 24(3) USDA SCHOOL MEAL PROGRAMS FACE NEW CHALLENGES Joanne Guthrie, Constance Newman, and Katherine Ralston In 2008, the USDA’s National School Lunch Program (NSLP) and School Breakfast Program (SBP) fed almost 31 million children each school day. On a typical school day, lunch participants obtain more than one- third (35%) of their daily caloric intake at school; for children participating in both breakfast and lunch, the contribution of school food to caloric intake rises to almost one-half (47%) (Story, 2009). The programs promote the food security of low-income households with children by providing meals to those children at free or reduced price. In addition, the programs strive to improve the diets and health of all participating children. When school meal programs began (see timeline, Table 1), their focus was on ensuring that all children had something to eat for lunch. Today, overweight and obesity have become the most common nutrition problems among American children. Children are described as “overweight but undernourished” as they consume diets high in saturated fat, added sugars, and sodium, but low in fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and lowfat milk. Public concern has risen concerning the quality of foods available to schoolchildren and whether USDA school meal programs contribute to the growing problem of childhood obesity. In response, there is a desire to update and strengthen nutritional requirements for USDA-funded school meals and regulate the nutritional content of other foods and beverages sold at school—often referred to as “competitive foods.” At the same time, the economic downturn has brought renewed emphasis on the role of the programs as a nutrition safety net for children, with advocates proposing changes to make more children eligible for free meals.
    [Show full text]
  • Mcgovern Dole Food for Education Program
    The Global Effort to Reduce Child Hunger and Increase School Attendance McGovern-Dole International Food for Education and Child Nutrition Program Report to the United States Congress Fiscal Year 2015 Cover: School girls in Laos enjoy their midday meal prepared with U.S.-donated milled rice and vitamin A fortified vegetable oil, supplemented by local vegetables. Photo courtesy of USDA McGovern-Dole staff. ii Contents PREFACE ............................................................................................................................................................. 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................. 2 I. Program Overview: Basic Operations .......................................................................................................... 5 Breakdown of Costs .............................................................................................................................................. 7 Legislative Mandates on Food Security, Sustainability, and Increased School Attendance ................................. 9 A. Promoting Graduation to Sustainable, Nationally-Owned School Meals Program ............................. 9 B. McGovern-Dole and All Other Donors FY 2015 .............................................................................. 10 C. Increased School Attendance ............................................................................................................. 13 D. Improving
    [Show full text]
  • New School Meal Standards — Digesting the Details by Linda Antinoro, JD, RD, LDN, CDE
    New School Meal Standards — Digesting the Details By Linda Antinoro, JD, RD, LDN, CDE In 1946, Congress tasked the USDA with regulating nutrition standards for school meals, according to the agency‟s Food and Nutrition Service. As a result, the National School Lunch Program was created. Public and nonprofit private schools and residential child care institutions may participate in the National School Lunch Program. More than 15 years since the last major revision, improved nutrition standards for school meals were unveiled in January 2012.1 The new standards detailed in “Nutrition Standards in the National School Lunch and School Breakfast Programs” will impact nearly 32 million children whom the USDA says participate in school meal programs daily. The standards will be largely phased in over a three-year period starting July 1, 2012, according to the final rule. The rule includes specific timetables for varying provisions of the meal standards, such as stricter sodium reductions that will take between five and 10 years to implement, while it allows schools to implement certain aspects of the new requirements sooner than mandated. This continuing education activity will provide a comprehensive review of the 79-page USDA final rule and examine the process that led to its formulation. Road to a Rule Federal law requires the USDA to update school meal standards to mesh with the agency‟s broader Dietary Guidelines for Americans, according to background information in the final rule. It also requires school meals to be based on recommendations from the Institute of Medicine‟s Nation Research Council of the National Academies of Science.
    [Show full text]