Democrats Set to Win Massachusetts, Connecticut Senate Races

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE November 2, 2012 INTERVIEWS: Tom Jensen 919-744-6312 IF YOU HAVE BASIC METHODOLOGICAL QUESTIONS, PLEASE E-MAIL [email protected], OR CONSULT THE FINAL PARAGRAPH OF THE PRESS RELEASE Democrats set to win Massachusetts, Connecticut Senate races Raleigh, N.C. – PPP's final polls in Massachusetts and Connecticut find that Democrats are likely to pick up the Senate seat in the former and hold onto the open seat in the latter. Elizabeth Warren leads Scott Brown 52-46 in the Massachusetts contest, while Chris Murphy has a 52-43 advantage over Linda McMahon in Connecticut. Scott Brown has a 52/36 approval rating. Usually Senators with those kinds of approval numbers are safe for reelection. But Warren needed to do 2 things in this campaign: solidify the Democratic vote behind her and reduce Brown's advantage with independents. She's succeeded on both of those fronts. 84% of Democrats are planning to vote for her, only slightly less than the 88% of Republicans Brown's winning. And Warren's deficit with independents is only 21 points at 59-38. Our final poll of the 2010 Massachusetts Senate special election found Brown defeating Martha Coakley 64-32 with them so Warren's really made up a fair amount of ground on that front. In Connecticut our final poll finds Chris Murphy with his largest lead all year at 9 points. He's increased his advantage by 5 points since two weeks ago when he was ahead just 48- 44. Linda McMahon, already unpopular, has just become more disliked by voters in the state over the last couple weeks. Only 37% have a favorable opinion of her to 52% with an unfavorable one. “In August polling found the Democratic candidates trailing in both of these New England Senate races,” said Dean Debnam, President of Public Policy Polling. “But Elizabeth Warren and Chris Murphy have closed strongly and appear to be in a safe position for victory, which will go a long way toward helping their party keep its majority.” Barack Obama leads the Presidential race comfortably in both of these states, 57/42 in Massachusetts and 55/42 in Connecticut. But both of those leads are down considerably from his margin of victory in 2008- he's dropped 11 points from his 26 point win in Massachusetts and 10 points from his 23 point win in Connecticut. PPP surveyed 1,089 likely voters in Massachusetts and 1,220 in Connecticut on November 1st and 2nd. The margin of error for MA is +/-3.0% and for CT it’s +/-2.8%. This poll was not paid for or authorized by any campaign or political organization. PPP surveys are conducted through automated telephone interviews. Public Policy Polling Phone: 888 621-6988 Web: 3020 Highwoods Blvd. www.publicpolicypolling.comRaleigh, NC 27604 Massachusetts Survey Results Q1 The candidates for President are Democrat Q7 Do you approve or disapprove of Senator John Barack Obama and Republican Mitt Romney. If Kerry’s job performance? the election was today, who would you vote 50% for? Approve .......................................................... Disapprove...................................................... 33% Barack Obama................................................ 57% Not sure .......................................................... 17% Mitt Romney.................................................... 42% Q8 Generally speaking, if there was an election for Undecided....................................................... 2% Senate today, would you vote for Democrat Q2 The candidates for Senate are Democrat John Kerry or his Republican opponent? Elizabeth Warren and Republican Scott Brown. 54% If the election was today, who would you vote John Kerry ...................................................... for? Republican opponent ...................................... 30% Elizabeth Warren ............................................ 52% Not sure .......................................................... 15% Scott Brown .................................................... 46% Q9 Would you describe yourself as very liberal, somewhat liberal, moderate, somewhat Undecided....................................................... 2% conservative, or very conservative? Q3 Do you approve or disapprove of President 13% Barack Obama’s job performance? Very liberal...................................................... Somewhat liberal ............................................ 23% Approve .......................................................... 51% Moderate......................................................... 35% Disapprove...................................................... 43% Somewhat conservative.................................. 23% Not sure .......................................................... 7% Q4 Do you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion Very conservative ........................................... 6% of Mitt Romney? Q10 If you are a woman, press 1. If a man, press 2. Favorable........................................................ 40% Woman ........................................................... 57% Unfavorable .................................................... 54% Man................................................................. 43% Not sure .......................................................... 7% Q11 If you are a Democrat, press 1. If a Republican, press 2. If you are an independent or identify Q5 Do you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion with another party, press 3. of Ellizabeth Warren? Democrat ........................................................ 39% Favorable........................................................ 50% Republican...................................................... 16% Unfavorable .................................................... 43% Independent/Other.......................................... 45% Not sure .......................................................... 7% Q12 If you are white, press 1. If other, press 2. Q6 Do you approve or disapprove of Senator Scott Brown’s job performance? White .............................................................. 82% Approve .......................................................... 52% Other............................................................... 18% Disapprove...................................................... 36% Not sure .......................................................... 12% November 1-2, 2012 3020 Highwoods Blvd. Survey of 1,089 likely voters Raleigh, NC 27604 [email protected] / 888 621-6988 Q13 If you are 18 to 29 years old, press 1. If 30 to 45, press 2. If 46 to 65, press 3. If you are older than 65, press 4. 18 to 29........................................................... 15% 30 to 45........................................................... 24% 46 to 65........................................................... 41% Older than 65 .................................................. 20% November 1-2, 2012 3020 Highwoods Blvd. Survey of 1,089 likely voters Raleigh, NC 27604 [email protected] / 888 621-6988 Crosstabs Ideology Ideology Very Som ew hat Som ew hat Very Very Som ew hat Som ew hat Very Bas e liberal liberal Moderate conservative conservative Bas e liberal liberal Moderate conservative conservative Obam a/Rom ney Warren/Brow n Barack Obama 57% 89% 88% 54% 25% 10% El iz ab e t h War r e n 52% 84% 84% 47% 22% 9% Mitt Romney 42% 11% 11% 43% 73% 88% Scott Brown 46% 16% 15% 49% 78% 90% Unde cide d 2% - 1% 3% 1% 2% Unde cide d 2% - 1% 4% 1% 1% Ideology Ideology Very Som ew hat Som ew hat Very Very Som ew hat Som ew hat Very Bas e liberal liberal Moderate conservative conservative Bas e liberal liberal Moderate conservative conservative Obama Approval Romney Favorability Approve 51% 79% 78% 48% 24% 10% Favorable 40% 11% 11% 40% 72% 83% Disapprove 43% 18% 16% 43% 71% 87% Unfavorable 54% 86% 84% 50% 23% 11% Not s ur e 7% 3% 6% 10% 6% 3% Not s ur e 7% 3% 5% 10% 5% 6% November 1-2, 2012 3020 Highwoods Blvd. survey of 1,089 likely voters Raleigh, NC 27604 [email protected] / 888 621-6988 Crosstabs Ideology Ideology Very Som ew hat Som ew hat Very Very Som ew hat Som ew hat Very Bas e liberal liberal Moderate conservative conservative Bas e liberal liberal Moderate conservative conservative Warren Favorability Brown Approval Favorable 50% 84% 80% 44% 21% 9% Approve 52% 22% 32% 55% 77% 82% Unfavorable 43% 15% 15% 47% 71% 82% Disapprove 36% 69% 57% 29% 13% 9% Not s ur e 7% 0% 5% 9% 8% 8% Not s ur e 12% 8% 11% 16% 9% 8% Ideology Ideology Very Som ew hat Som ew hat Very Very Som ew hat Som ew hat Very Bas e liberal liberal Moderate conservative conservative Bas e liberal liberal Moderate conservative conservative Kerry Approval Kerry or GOP Opponent? Approve 50% 74% 76% 46% 28% 4% John Kerry 54% 84% 85% 51% 24% 9% Disapprove 33% 15% 11% 34% 51% 80% Republican 30% 12% 4% 30% 55% 78% Not s ur e 17% 11% 13% 20% 22% 16% opponent Not s ur e 15% 4% 11% 19% 21% 13% November 1-2, 2012 3020 Highwoods Blvd. survey of 1,089 likely voters Raleigh, NC 27604 [email protected] / 888 621-6988 Crosstabs Ge nder Ge nder Bas e Wom an Man Bas e Wom an Man Obama/Romney Warren/Brown Barack Obama 57% 59% 53% Eliz ab e t h War r e n 52% 55% 48% Mitt Romney 42% 39% 45% Scott Brown 46% 44% 49% Unde cide d 2% 1% 2% Unde cide d 2% 1% 3% Ge nder Ge nder Bas e Wom an Man Bas e Wom an Man Obama Approval Romney Favorability Approve 51% 53% 47% Favorable 40% 38% 43% Dis appr ove 43% 39% 47% Unfavorable 54% 55% 51% Not s ur e 7% 7% 6% Not s ur e 7% 7% 6% November 1-2, 2012 3020 Highwoods Blvd. survey of
Recommended publications
  • MARTHA HART, in Her Personal Capacity and ) As Personal Representative of ) the ESTATE of OWEN JAMES HART, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) C.A

    MARTHA HART, in Her Personal Capacity and ) As Personal Representative of ) the ESTATE of OWEN JAMES HART, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) C.A

    Case 3:10-cv-00975-SRU Document 27 Filed 08/05/10 Page 1 of 53 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT __________________________________________ ) MARTHA HART, in her personal capacity and ) as personal representative of ) THE ESTATE OF OWEN JAMES HART, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) C.A. No. 3:10-cv-00975-SRU v. ) ) WORLD WRESTLING ENTERTAINMENT, ) INC., VINCE MCMAHON and ) LINDA MCMAHON, ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND Plaintiff Martha Hart, in her personal capacity and as personal representative of the Estate of Owen James Hart (“Estate”), by and through her attorneys, Nixon Peabody LLP, alleges for her First Amended Complaint for Breach of Contract, Unjust Enrichment, Accounting, Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices and negligent supervision against Defendants World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc. (“WWE”), Vince McMahon and Linda McMahon as follows: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. Martha Hart, the widow of Owen James Hart, sues defendants WWE and Vince McMahon and Linda McMahon, the WWE’s current and/or past owners, officers and principal decision makers, for their wrongful usurpation of Martha’s right, as personal representative of her husband’s estate, to control Owen’s likeness, name and celebrity. Owen Hart died on May 23, 1999 when he fell from an apparatus approximately 80 feet high into a wrestling ring before a crowd of 16,500 in a reckless and dangerous stunt that was negligently planned, orchestrated and directed by the WWE. At the time of the stunt Vince and Linda McMahon were the WWE’s 13073191.1 Case 3:10-cv-00975-SRU Document 27 Filed 08/05/10 Page 2 of 53 - 2 - two principal executives.
  • Donald Trump Shoots the Match1 Sharon Mazer

    Donald Trump Shoots the Match1 Sharon Mazer

    Donald Trump Shoots the Match1 Sharon Mazer The day I realized it can be smart to be shallow was, for me, a deep experience. —Donald J. Trump (2004; in Remnick 2017:19) I don’t care if it’s real or not. Kill him! Kill him! 2 He’s currently President of the USA, but a scant 10 years ago, Donald Trump stepped into the squared circle, facing off against WWE owner and quintessential heel Mr. McMahon3 in the “Battle of the Billionaires” (WrestleMania XXIII). The stakes were high. The loser would have his head shaved by the winner. (Spoiler alert: Trump won.) Both Trump and McMahon kept their suits on—oversized, with exceptionally long ties—in a way that made their heads appear to hover, disproportionately small, over their bulky (Trump) and bulked up (McMahon) bodies. As avatars of capitalist, patriarchal power, they left the heavy lifting to the gleamingly exposed, hypermasculinist bodies of their pro-wrestler surrogates. McMahon performed an expert heel turn: a craven villain, egging the audience to taunt him as a clueless, elitist frontman as he did the job of casting Trump as an (unlikely) babyface, the crowd’s champion. For his part, Trump seemed more mark than smart. Where McMahon and the other wrestlers were working around him, like ham actors in an outsized play, Trump was shooting the match: that is, not so much acting naturally as neglecting to act at all. He soaked up the cheers, stalked the ring, took a fall, threw a sucker punch, and claimed victory as if he (and he alone) had fought the good fight (WWE 2013b).
  • Who Trump Is Putting in Power by Jessica Huseman, Ian Macdougall and Rob Weychert Updated January 19, 2018

    Who Trump Is Putting in Power by Jessica Huseman, Ian Macdougall and Rob Weychert Updated January 19, 2018

    THE CHOSEN H H H Who Trump Is Putting in Power by Jessica Huseman, Ian MacDougall and Rob Weychert Updated January 19, 2018 We’ve created an easy-to-print version of our cards showing President Trump’s key picks. Use them however you like: as con- versation-starting stocking stuffers, with students, or just to test your knowledge of the unfolding administration. Enjoy — and let us know what you do with them! PROPUB.LI/CABINET-CARDS REX TILLERSON SECRETARY OF STATE H Confirmed by the Senate (56–43) REX TILLERSON SECRETARY OF STATE YOUR READING GUIDE H Tillerson is the former CEO of Exxon Mobil. At the State Department, he has overseen a massive downsizing, which resulted in what the New Yorker called “the near-dismantling of America’s diplomatic corps.” He originally supported Jeb Bush for president, and he has had a tumultuous relationship with Trump. He reportedly called the president a “moron” after a July 2017 meeting with other senior officials. For his part, Trump has repeatedly undermined Tillerson, and rumors of Tillerson’s impending departure from Foggy Bottom have dogged him for much of his tenure. PROPUB.LI/CABINET-CARDS STEVE MNUCHIN SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY H Confirmed by the Senate (53–47) STEVE MNUCHIN SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY YOUR READING GUIDE H The former Goldman Sachs banker served as Trump’s campaign finance chairman. Mnuchin was a key booster for the recent tax cut. Reports that he and his wife, Louise Linton (who also generated controversy for comments viewed as tone-deaf), used a government plane to fly to Kentucky to see an eclipse triggered an investigation by Treasury’s Inspector General.
  • Unreported Cases

    Unreported Cases

    2001] UNREPORTED CASES defended in bad faith, such that the fees paid by Statek to finance the defense should never have been expended in the first place. This Court has already held, and the Delaware Supreme Court has affirmed, that Johnston and Spillane defended the §225 action in bad faith and were personally liable to pay Vendel's attorneys' fees and expenses.2 This Court found (in the words of the Supreme Court) that "the conduct of the Defendants rose to the level of bad faith because they had no valid defense and knew it."2" This Court also found that " that conduct also to supports the conclusion that the defendants in2°9 bad faith forced Vendel commence and prosecute [the §225] action." From these findings it follows (in my opinion, inescapably) that the defendants also acted in bad faith by causing Statek to finance their defense, which was found to be a "sham" and "intended to delay the inevitable day of reckoning, and to enable the defendants to continue mulcting the corporation without detection. 2' 1 To say it differently, had defendants not acted in bad faith, the §225 action would never have been prosecuted and there would have been no defense costs for Statek to bear. The same fiduciary duty considerations that justified shifting to the defendants the liability to pay Vendel's fees, also warrant shifting to those defendants the fees and other defense costs they improperly caused Statek to incur. Because there was no "good faith" dispute about the merits of the claim in the §225 action, the defendants are liable to Statek for the fees and expenses it paid to defend that action.
  • Public Version Dated: June 15, 2021 in the Court Of

    Public Version Dated: June 15, 2021 in the Court Of

    EFiled: Jun 15 2021 04:22PM EDT PUBLIC VERSION DATED: Transaction ID 66689114 JUNE 15, 2021 Case No. 2021-0513-LWW IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE AMER DASTGIR, Derivatively on ) Behalf of WORLD WRESTLING ) ENTERTAINMENT, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) Civil Action No. 2021-0513-LWW ) v. ) ) VINCENT K. MCMAHON, ) STEPHANIE MCMAHON, PAUL ) LEVESQUE, GEORGE A. BARRIOS, ) MICHELLE D. WILSON, FRANK A. ) RIDDICK, III, JEFFREY R. SPEED, ) STUART U. GOLDFARB, LAUREEN ) ONG, ROBYN W. PETERSON, MAN ) JIT SINGH, ALAN M. WEXLER, and ) PATRICIA A. GOTTESMAN, ) ) Defendants, ) ) - and - ) ) WORLD WRESTLING ) ENTERTAINMENT, INC. ) ) Nominal Defendant. ) VERIFIED STOCKHOLDER DERIVATIVE COMPLAINT Plaintiff Amer Dastgir (“Plaintiff”), by and through his undersigned attorneys, alleges the following upon personal knowledge as to all allegations concerning himself, and upon information and belief as to all other allegations based, among other things, upon the investigation conducted by his attorneys, which includes a review and analysis of: (a) documents produced to Plaintiff by PUBLIC VERSION DATED: JUNE 15, 2021 World Wrestling Entertainment, Inc. (“WWE” or the “Company”) in response to a books and records inspection demand made pursuant to Section 220 of the Delaware Corporation Law (the “Books and Records Production”); filings in various proceedings, including a class action lawsuit alleging violations of federal securities laws captioned, City of Warren Police & Fire Ret. Sys. v. World Wrestling Entm’t Inc., No. 20-cv-2031 (S.D.N.Y.) (the “Securities Action”) and the decision of the District Court in that case denying defendants’ motion to dismiss in its entirety, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 140925, (the “Securities Action Opinion”); (c) WWE’s filings with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”); (d) WWE’s press releases, website, corporate governance documents, presentations, conference calls, and other publicly disseminated information; and (e) analyst reports, public records, and other publicly available information concerning the Company.
  • Administration of Donald J. Trump, 2018 Remarks on Presenting The

    Administration of Donald J. Trump, 2018 Remarks on Presenting The

    Administration of Donald J. Trump, 2018 Remarks on Presenting the Presidential Medal of Freedom November 16, 2018 The President. Thank you very much. Please. It's a great honor. Melania and I are thrilled to welcome you to the White House as we honor the recipients of our Nation's highest civilian honor: the Presidential Medal of Freedom, something very, very special. We are joined today by many members of my administration, including Secretary of State Mike Pompeo. Hello, Mike. Steve Mnuchin. Steve, thank you very much. Wilbur Ross, Alex Acosta, Matt Whittaker—Matt. Ben Carson, Betsy DeVos, Administrator Linda McMahon, Ambassador Lighthizer, and Acting Administrator—who, I will tell you, is going to be made permanent—he's done a fantastic job, and I want to congratulate him—EPA—Andrew Wheeler. Where's Andrew? Congratulations, Andrew. Great job. Great job. Thank you very much. Thank you as well to Senator Amy Klobuchar for being here. Where is Amy, by the way? Where is Amy? I did better before, Amy. And for five decades—I have to say—the Presidential Medal of Freedom has been given to individuals who have made outstanding contributions to American life and culture. This year, it is my true privilege to award this honor to seven extraordinary Americans: Senator Orrin Hatch; the late, great Justice Antonin Scalia; Miriam Adelson; Roger Staubach; Alan Page; and two more recipients who are no longer with us, but whose legacies will live on forever—legendary Babe Ruth, legendary Elvis Presley. True legends. The first recipient is one of the longest serving and most respected Senators in American history, Senator Orrin Hatch, a friend of mine, great friend of mine.
  • Trump Administration Key Policy Personnel Updated: February 5, 2017 Positions NOT Subject to Senate Confirmation in Italics ______

    Trump Administration Key Policy Personnel Updated: February 5, 2017 Positions NOT Subject to Senate Confirmation in Italics ______

    Trump Administration Key Policy Personnel Updated: February 5, 2017 Positions NOT subject to Senate confirmation in italics ______________________________________________________________________________________________ White House Chief of Staff: Reince Priebus Priebus is the former Chairman of the Republican National Committee (RNC). He previously worked as chairman of the Republican Party of Wisconsin. He has a long history in Republican politics as a grassroots volunteer. He worked his way up through the ranks of the Republican Party of Wisconsin as 1st Congressional District Chairman, State Party Treasurer, First Vice Chair, and eventually State Party Chairman. In 2009, he served as General Counsel to the RNC, a role in which he volunteered his time. White House Chief Strategist and Senior Counselor: Stephen Bannon Bannon worked as the campaign CEO for Trump’s presidential campaign. He is the Executive Chairman of Breitbart News Network, LLC and the Chief Executive Officer of American Vantage Media Corporation and Affinity Media. Mr. Bannon is also a Partner of Societe Gererale, a talent management company in the entertainment business. He has served as the Chief Executive Officer and President of Genius Products, Inc. since February 2005. Attorney General: Senator Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) Sen. Sessions began his legal career as a practicing attorney in Russellville, Alabama, and then in Mobile. Following a two- year stint as Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of Alabama, Sessions was nominated by President Reagan in 1981 and confirmed by the Senate to serve as the United States Attorney for Alabama’s Southern District, a position he held for 12 years. Sessions was elected Alabama Attorney General in 1995, serving as the state’s chief legal officer until 1997, when he entered the United States Senate.
  • Infographic: a Look at Donald Trump's Administration

    Infographic: a Look at Donald Trump's Administration

    Infographic: A look at Donald Trump’s administration - The Boston Globe BOS 0 2 nd Prd NSH 1 Infographic: A look at Donald Trump’s administration E-MAIL FACEBOOK TWITTER GOOGLE+ LINKEDIN 22 By Matt Rocheleau GLOBE STAFF DECEMBER 02, 2016 President-elect Donald Trump's administration Click each name for more details. Some positions require Senate confirmation. Positions left blank have not yet https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2016/12/02/infographic-look-donald-trump-administration/XJKzKNwAY2U3xg6HXufP2J/story.html[1/12/2017 9:12:16 PM] Infographic: A look at Donald Trump’s administration - The Boston Globe been filled. Last updated: Jan. 12. Title Name Known for Official Cabinet positions (in order of succession to the presidency) President Donald Trump Businessman Vice President Mike Pence Governor, Indiana Secretary of State Rex Tillerson Exxon Mobil CEO Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin Former Goldman Sachs executive Defense Secretary James Mattis Retired Marine general Attorney General Jeff Sessions U.S. Senator, Alabama Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke U.S. Representative, Montana Agriculture Secretary - - Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross Investor Labor Secretary Andrew Puzder Fast-food executive Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price U.S. Representative, Georgia Housing and Urban Development Secretary Ben Carson Retired neurosurgeon, presidential candidate Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao Former Labor secretary Energy Secretary Rick Perry Former Texas governor, presidential candidate Education Secretary Betsy DeVos Former chair Michigan Republican Party, education activist Veterans Affairs Secretary David Shulkin Physician, under secretary of Veterans Affairs Homeland Security Secretary John F. Kelly Retired Marine general "Cabinet-rank" positions Chief of Staff Reince Priebus RNC chairman EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt Oklahoma attorney general Office of Management and Budget Director Mick Mulvaney U.S.
  • Donald Trump, Professional Wrestling, and the Electoral Geography of Vengeance and Redemption

    Donald Trump, Professional Wrestling, and the Electoral Geography of Vengeance and Redemption

    Donald Trump, Professional Wrestling, and the Electoral Geography of Vengeance and Redemption WrestlePosium I 2020 John Heppen, University of Wisconsin, River Falls, David Beard, University of Minnesota Duluth Cartography by Matt Millett University of Wisconsin River Falls Overview • We will outline the connection between Trump and Professional Wrestling. • We will hypothesize that Trump's connection to wrestling culture shapes his political messaging. • We will outline three features of "wrestling rhetoric" and we will illustrate aspects of Trump's political messaging that share these features. • We will hypothesize that regions of the country in which wrestling is popular will be regions of the country in which Trump won the popular vote. • We will map attendance at WWE events; regions in which a higher proportion of the population attend wrestling events, we predict, will be regions where a higher proportion of the electorate voted for Trump. Donald Trump Wrestlemania IV Trump’s History with the WWE: Pre-Politics • Trump as commercial partner: • Trump Plaza hosted Wrestlemania IV (1988) & V (89) in Atlantic City. • Trump was interviewed during Wrestlemania VII in Los Angeles (1991) and XX New York (2004) • Trump as character in WWE narratives: • Trump was part of the Battle of the Billionaires for Wrestlemania 23 (2007) in Detroit. Proxies for Trump and Vince McMahon wrestled each other. • Trump buys Raw from owner Vince McMahon in 2009 in order to give fans their moneys’ worth. Plot line ended quickly. Donald Trump Wrestlemania 23 Donald Trump Buying Raw 2009 Trump’s History with the WWE: In Politics •Trump contributed to Linda McMahon’s US Senate campaigns.
  • Petition for Mandamus

    Petition for Mandamus

    USCA4 Appeal: 18-2486 Doc: 2-2 Filed: 12/17/2018 Pg: 1 of 189 ADDENDUM USCA4 Appeal: 18-2486 Doc: 2-2 Filed: 12/17/2018 Pg: 2 of 189 TABLE OF CONTENTS Record Materials: District Court Opinion, Dkt. No. 101 (March 28, 2018) .......................................... Add. 1 District Court Order, Dkt. No. 102 (March 28, 2018) ............................................ Add. 48 District Court Opinion, Dkt No. 123 (July 25, 2018) .............................................. Add. 50 District Court Order, Dkt. No. 124 (July 25, 2018) ............................................... Add. 102 District Court Memorandum Opinion, Dkt. No. 135 (November 2, 2018) ...... Add. 104 District Court Order, Dkt. No. 136 (November 2, 2018) .................................... Add. 135 Amended Complaint, Dkt. No 95 (February 23, 2018) ........................................ Add. 136 Constitutional and Statutory Provisions: U.S. Const. art. I, § 9, cl. 8 ......................................................................................... Add. 185 U.S. Const. art. II, § 1, cl. 7 ........................................................................................ Add. 185 28 U.S.C. § 1292 .......................................................................................................... Add. 186 28 U.S.C. § 1651 .......................................................................................................... Add. 187 USCA4 Appeal: 18-2486 Doc: 2-2 Filed: 12/17/2018 Pg: 3 of 189 Case 8:17-cv-01596-PJM Document 101 Filed 03/28/18 Page
  • Women Appointed to Presidential Cabinets

    Women Appointed to Presidential Cabinets

    WOMEN APPOINTED TO PRESIDENTIAL CABINETS Eleven women have been confirmed to serve in cabinet (6) and cabinet level (5) positions in the Biden administration.1 A total of 64 women have held a total of 72 such positions in presidential administrations, with eight women serving in two different posts. (These figures do not include acting officials.) Among the 64 women, 41 were appointed by Democratic presidents and 23 by Republican presidents. Only 12 U.S presidents (5D, 7R) have appointed women to cabinet or cabinet-level positions since the first woman was appointed by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1933.2 Party breakdown of women appointed to Presidential Cabinets: 41D 23R Cabinet or Cabinet-level Firsts: First Woman First Black Woman First Latina First Asian Pacific First Native Appointed Appointed Appointed Islander Woman American Woman Appointed Appointed Frances Perkins Patricia Roberts Aída Álvarez Elaine Chao Debra Haaland Secretary of Labor Harris Administrator, Secretary of Labor Secretary of the 1933 (Roosevelt) Secretary of Small Business 2001 (G.W. Bush) Interior Housing and Urban Administration 2021 (Biden) Development 1997 (Clinton) 1977 (Carter) To date, 27 cabinet or cabinet-level posts have been filled by women. Cabinet and cabinet-level positions vary by presidential administration. Our final authority for designating cabinet or cabinet-level in an 1 This does not include Shalanda Young, who currently serves as Acting Director of the Office of Management and Budget. 2 In addition, although President Truman did not appoint any women, Secretary of Labor Frances Perkins, a holdover from the Roosevelt administration, served in his cabinet. © COPYRIGHT 2021 Center for American Women and Politic, Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers University 4/6/2021 administration is that president's official library.
  • Roxanna Moritz Scott County Auditor

    Roxanna Moritz Scott County Auditor

    GOVERNMENT GUIDEBOOK Local History Boards & Commissions County Departments & Agencies Local, State & Federal Elected Officials Roxanna Moritz Scott County Auditor Revised January, 2018- for most recent online version go to www.scottcountyiowa.com/auditor THE EARLYC HISTORYONTENTS OF SCOTT COUNTY ....................... 3 SCOTT COUNTY MAP…………………………………………….7 POPULATION INFORMATION .......................................... 9 NATIONAL OFFICIALS .....................................................10 IOWA CONGRESSIONAL & STATE OFFICIALS ....................14 JUDICIAL INFORMATION .................................................35 COUNTY OFFICIALS & DEPARTMENT HEADS ...................38 BOARDS & COMMISSIONS ...............................................48 CITY & TOWN OFFICERS .................................................73 TOWNSHIP OFFICERS…………………………………………..102 SCHOOL BOARDS……………………………………………… .116 FIRE DISTRICT TRUSTEES……………………………………...120 TAX INFORMATION ……………………………………………..122 LICENSES & PERMITS……………………………………………124 FUNDED SERVICE AGENCIES…………………………………..126 THE EARLY HISTORY OF SCOTT COUNTY (Taken from the 1902 Scott County Atlas) Scott County was organized by an act of the territorial legislature of Wisconsin, which convened at Burlington, Iowa in December 1837. It was named in honor of General Winfield Scott who, in September 1832, held a treaty with the Indians upon its soil. By that treaty the territory embraced in the county of Scott, together with all the rest of the Black Hawk Purchase, was ceded to the United States and on June 1st, 1833, was opened for settlement. The treaty was held in what is now the city of Davenport. The signing of the treaty was originally scheduled to take place in Ft. Armstrong, on the Illinois side of the Mississippi River, but due to an outbreak of cholera, the ceremony was moved to the western side of the Mississippi. The treaty provided that a strip of land 50 miles wide, from Ft. Madison to a point just north of the Yellow River (now Allamakee County), be sold to the United States government.