Introduction to Mathematical Optimization R. Clark Robinson

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Introduction to Mathematical Optimization R. Clark Robinson Introduction to Mathematical Optimization R. Clark Robinson Copyright c 2013 by R. Clark Robinson Department of Mathematics Northwestern University Evanston Illinois 60208 USA Contents Preface v Chapter 1. Linear Programming 1 1.1. Basic Problem 1 1.2. Graphical Solution 2 1.3. Simplex Method 5 1.3.1. Slack Variables 5 1.3.2. Simplex Method for Resource Requirements 7 1.3.3. General Constraints 10 1.4. Duality 17 1.4.1. Duality for Non-standard Linear Programs 19 1.4.2. Duality Theorems 21 1.5. Sensitivity Analysis 27 1.5.1. Changes in Objective Function Coefficients 29 1.6. Theory for Simplex Method 31 Chapter 2. Unconstrained Extrema 39 2.1. Mathematical Background 39 n 2.1.1. Types of Subsets of R 39 2.1.2. Continuous Functions 41 2.1.3. Existence of Extrema 43 2.1.4. Differentiation in Multi-Dimensions 44 2.1.5. Second Derivative and Taylor’s Theorem 47 2.1.6. Quadratic Forms 50 2.2. Derivative Conditions 55 2.2.1. First Derivative Conditions 56 2.2.2. Second Derivative Conditions 56 Chapter 3. Constrained Extrema 61 3.1. Implicit Function Theorem 61 3.2. Extrema with Equality Constraints 69 3.2.1. Interpretation of Lagrange Multipliers 73 iii iv Contents 3.3. Extrema with Inequality Constraints: Necessary Conditions 75 3.4. Extrema with Inequality Constraints: Sufficient Conditions 81 3.4.1. Convex Structures 81 3.4.2. Karush-Kuhn-Tucker Theorem under Convexity 84 3.4.3. Rescaled Convex Functions 88 3.4.4. Global Extrema for Concave Functions 92 3.4.5. Proof of Karush-Kuhn-Tucker Theorem 93 3.5. Second-Order Conditions for Extrema of Constrained Functions 98 Chapter 4. Dynamic Programming 107 4.1. Parametric Maximization and Correspondences 107 4.1.1. Budget Correspondence for Commodity Bundles 113 4.1.2. Existence of a Nash Equilibrium 114 4.2. Finite-Horizon Dynamic Programming 117 4.2.1. Supremum and Infimum 121 4.2.2. General Theorems 121 4.3. Infinite-Horizon Dynamic Program 124 4.3.1. Examples 127 4.3.2. Theorems for Bounded Reward Function 134 4.3.3. Theorems for One-Sector Economy 136 4.3.4. Continuity of Value Function 141 Appendix A. Mathematical Language 147 Bibliography 149 Index 151 Preface This book has been used in an upper division undergraduate course about optimization given in the Mathematics Department at Northwestern University. Only deterministic problems with a continuous choice of options are considered, hence optimization of functions whose variables are (possibly) restricted to a subset of the real numbers or some Euclidean space. We treat the case of both linear and nonlinear functions. Optimization of linear functions with linear constraints is the topic of Chapter 1, linear programming. The optimization of nonlinear func- tions begins in Chapter 2 with a more complete treatment of maximization of unconstrained functions that is covered in calculus. Chapter 3 considers optimization with constraints. First, we treat equality constraints that includes the Implicit Function Theorem and the method of Lagrange multipliers. Then we treat inequality constraints, which is the covers Karush-Kuhn- Tucker Theory. Included is a consideration of convex and concave functions. Finally, Chapter 4 considers maximization over multiple time periods, or dynamic programming. Although only considering discrete time, we treat both finite and infinite number of time periods. In previous years, I have used the textbooks by Sundaram [14] and Walker [16]. Our presentation of linear programming is heavily influenced by [16] and the material on nonlinear functions by [14]. The prerequisites include courses on linear algebra and differentiation of functions of sev- eral variables. Knowledge of linear algebra is especially important. The simplex method to solve linear programs involves a special type of row reduction of matrices. We also use the concepts of the rank of a matrix and linear independence of a collection of vectors. In terms of differentiation, we assume that the reader knows about partial derivatives and the gradient of a real-valued function. With this background, we introduce the derivative of a function between Euclidean spaces as a matrix. This approach is used to treat implicit differentiation with several constraints and independence of constraints. In addition, we assume an exposure into formal presentation of mathematical definitions and theorems that our student get through a course on foundation to higher mathematics or a calculus course that introduces formal mathematical notation as our freshman MENU and MMSS courses do at Northwestern. Appendix A contains a brief summary of some of the mathematical language that is assumed from such a course. We do not assume the reader has had a course in real analysis. We do introduce a few concepts and terminology that is covered in depth in such a course, but merely require the reader to gain a working knowledge of this material so we can state results succinctly and accurately. I would appreciate being informed by email of any errors or confusing statements, whether typographical, numerical, grammatical, or miscellaneous. R. Clark Robinson Northwestern University Evanston Illinois [email protected] May 2013 v Chapter 1 Linear Programming In this chapter, we begin our consideration of optimization by considering linear programming, maximization or minimization of linear functions over a region determined by linear inequali- ties. The word ‘programming’ does not refer to ‘computer programming’ but originally referred to the ‘preparation of a schedule of activities’. Also, these problems can be solved by an algo- rithm that can be implemented on a computer, so linear programming is a widely used practical tool. We will only present the ideas and work low dimensional examples to gain an understand- ing of what the computer is doing when it solves the problem. However, the method scales well to examples with many variables and many constraints. 1.1. Basic Problem n For a real valued function f defined on a set F , written f : F ⊂ R ! R, f(F ) = ff(x): x 2 F g is the set of attainable values of f on F , or the image of F by f. We say that the real valued function f has a maximum on F at a point xM 2 F provided that f(xM ) ≥ f(x) for all x 2 F . When xM exists, the maximum value f(xM ) is written as maxff(x): x 2 F g and is called the maximum or maximal value of f on F . We also say that xM is a maximizer of f on F , or that f(xM ) maximizes f(x) subject to x 2 F . In the same way, we say that f has a minimum on F at a point xm 2 F provided that f(xm) ≤ f(x) for all x 2 F . The value f(xm) is written as minff(x): x 2 F g and is called the minimum or minimal value of f on F . We also say that xm is a minimizer of f on F , or that f(xM ) minimizes f(x) subject to x 2 F . The function f has an extremum at x0 2 F provided that x0 is either a maximizer or a minimizer. The point x0 is also called an optimal solution. Optimization Questions. • Does f(x) attain a maximum (or minimum) on F for some x 2 F ? • If so, what are the points at which f(x) attains a maximum (or minimum) subject to x 2 F , and what is the maximal value (or minimal value)? There are problems that have no maximum nor minimum. For example, there is no maxi- mizer or minimizer of f(x) = 1=x on (0; 1). 1 2 1. Linear Programming Notations We denote the transpose of a matrix (or a vector) A by A>. n For two vectors v and w in R , v ≥ w means that vi ≥ wi for all 1 ≤ i ≤ n. In the same way, v w means that vi > wi for all 1 ≤ i ≤ n. We also consider two positive n “quadrants” of R , n n n R+ = f x 2 R : x ≥ 0 g = f x 2 R : xi ≥ 0 for 1 ≤ i ≤ n g and n n n R++ = f x 2 R : x 0 g = f x 2 R : xi > 0 for 1 ≤ i ≤ n g: Definition. The rank of an m × n matrix A is used at various times in this course. The rank of A, rank(A), is the dimension of the column space of A, i.e., the largest number of linearly independent columns of A. This integer is the same as number of pivots in the row reduced echelon form of A. (See Lay [9].) It is possible to determine the rank by determinants of submatrices: rank(A) = k iff k ≥ 0 is the largest integer with det(Ak) 6= 0, where Ak is any k × k submatrix of A formed by selecting k columns and k rows. To see this is equivalent, let A0 be submatrix of A with k columns that are linearly independent and span column space, so rank(A0) = k. The dimension of the row space of A0 is k, so there are k rows of A0 forming the k × k submatrix Ak with rank(Ak) = k, so det(Ak) 6= 0. The submatrix Ak is also a submatrix of pivot columns and rows. Note in linear algebra, the pivot columns are usually chosen with the matrix in echelon form with zeroes in the row to the left of a pivot positions. We often choose other columns as will be since in the examples given in the rest of the chapter.
Recommended publications
  • A Lifted Linear Programming Branch-And-Bound Algorithm for Mixed Integer Conic Quadratic Programs Juan Pablo Vielma, Shabbir Ahmed, George L
    A Lifted Linear Programming Branch-and-Bound Algorithm for Mixed Integer Conic Quadratic Programs Juan Pablo Vielma, Shabbir Ahmed, George L. Nemhauser, H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 765 Ferst Drive NW, Atlanta, GA 30332-0205, USA, {[email protected], [email protected], [email protected]} This paper develops a linear programming based branch-and-bound algorithm for mixed in- teger conic quadratic programs. The algorithm is based on a higher dimensional or lifted polyhedral relaxation of conic quadratic constraints introduced by Ben-Tal and Nemirovski. The algorithm is different from other linear programming based branch-and-bound algo- rithms for mixed integer nonlinear programs in that, it is not based on cuts from gradient inequalities and it sometimes branches on integer feasible solutions. The algorithm is tested on a series of portfolio optimization problems. It is shown that it significantly outperforms commercial and open source solvers based on both linear and nonlinear relaxations. Key words: nonlinear integer programming; branch and bound; portfolio optimization History: February 2007. 1. Introduction This paper deals with the development of an algorithm for the class of mixed integer non- linear programming (MINLP) problems known as mixed integer conic quadratic program- ming problems. This class of problems arises from adding integrality requirements to conic quadratic programming problems (Lobo et al., 1998), and is used to model several applica- tions from engineering and finance. Conic quadratic programming problems are also known as second order cone programming problems, and together with semidefinite and linear pro- gramming (LP) problems are special cases of the more general conic programming problems (Ben-Tal and Nemirovski, 2001a).
    [Show full text]
  • Linear Programming
    Lecture 18 Linear Programming 18.1 Overview In this lecture we describe a very general problem called linear programming that can be used to express a wide variety of different kinds of problems. We can use algorithms for linear program- ming to solve the max-flow problem, solve the min-cost max-flow problem, find minimax-optimal strategies in games, and many other things. We will primarily discuss the setting and how to code up various problems as linear programs At the end, we will briefly describe some of the algorithms for solving linear programming problems. Specific topics include: • The definition of linear programming and simple examples. • Using linear programming to solve max flow and min-cost max flow. • Using linear programming to solve for minimax-optimal strategies in games. • Algorithms for linear programming. 18.2 Introduction In the last two lectures we looked at: — Bipartite matching: given a bipartite graph, find the largest set of edges with no endpoints in common. — Network flow (more general than bipartite matching). — Min-Cost Max-flow (even more general than plain max flow). Today, we’ll look at something even more general that we can solve algorithmically: linear pro- gramming. (Except we won’t necessarily be able to get integer solutions, even when the specifi- cation of the problem is integral). Linear Programming is important because it is so expressive: many, many problems can be coded up as linear programs (LPs). This especially includes problems of allocating resources and business 95 18.3. DEFINITION OF LINEAR PROGRAMMING 96 supply-chain applications. In business schools and Operations Research departments there are entire courses devoted to linear programming.
    [Show full text]
  • Integer Linear Programs
    20 ________________________________________________________________________________________________ Integer Linear Programs Many linear programming problems require certain variables to have whole number, or integer, values. Such a requirement arises naturally when the variables represent enti- ties like packages or people that can not be fractionally divided — at least, not in a mean- ingful way for the situation being modeled. Integer variables also play a role in formulat- ing equation systems that model logical conditions, as we will show later in this chapter. In some situations, the optimization techniques described in previous chapters are suf- ficient to find an integer solution. An integer optimal solution is guaranteed for certain network linear programs, as explained in Section 15.5. Even where there is no guarantee, a linear programming solver may happen to find an integer optimal solution for the par- ticular instances of a model in which you are interested. This happened in the solution of the multicommodity transportation model (Figure 4-1) for the particular data that we specified (Figure 4-2). Even if you do not obtain an integer solution from the solver, chances are good that you’ll get a solution in which most of the variables lie at integer values. Specifically, many solvers are able to return an ‘‘extreme’’ solution in which the number of variables not lying at their bounds is at most the number of constraints. If the bounds are integral, all of the variables at their bounds will have integer values; and if the rest of the data is integral, many of the remaining variables may turn out to be integers, too.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture Notes General Equilibrium Theory: Ss205
    LECTURE NOTES GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM THEORY: SS205 FEDERICO ECHENIQUE CALTECH 1 2 Contents 0. Disclaimer 4 1. Preliminary definitions 5 1.1. Binary relations 5 1.2. Preferences in Euclidean space 5 2. Consumer Theory 6 2.1. Digression: upper hemi continuity 7 2.2. Properties of demand 7 3. Economies 8 3.1. Exchange economies 8 3.2. Economies with production 11 4. Welfare Theorems 13 4.1. First Welfare Theorem 13 4.2. Second Welfare Theorem 14 5. Scitovsky Contours and cost-benefit analysis 20 6. Excess demand functions 22 6.1. Notation 22 6.2. Aggregate excess demand in an exchange economy 22 6.3. Aggregate excess demand 25 7. Existence of competitive equilibria 26 7.1. The Negishi approach 28 8. Uniqueness 32 9. Representative Consumer 34 9.1. Samuelsonian Aggregation 37 9.2. Eisenberg's Theorem 39 10. Determinacy 39 GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM THEORY 3 10.1. Digression: Implicit Function Theorem 40 10.2. Regular and Critical Economies 41 10.3. Digression: Measure Zero Sets and Transversality 44 10.4. Genericity of regular economies 45 11. Observable Consequences of Competitive Equilibrium 46 11.1. Digression on Afriat's Theorem 46 11.2. Sonnenschein-Mantel-Debreu Theorem: Anything goes 47 11.3. Brown and Matzkin: Testable Restrictions On Competitve Equilibrium 48 12. The Core 49 12.1. Pareto Optimality, The Core and Walrasian Equiilbria 51 12.2. Debreu-Scarf Core Convergence Theorem 51 13. Partial equilibrium 58 13.1. Aggregate demand and welfare 60 13.2. Production 61 13.3. Public goods 62 13.4. Lindahl equilibrium 63 14.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 11: Basic Linear Programming Concepts
    CHAPTER 11: BASIC LINEAR PROGRAMMING CONCEPTS Linear programming is a mathematical technique for finding optimal solutions to problems that can be expressed using linear equations and inequalities. If a real-world problem can be represented accurately by the mathematical equations of a linear program, the method will find the best solution to the problem. Of course, few complex real-world problems can be expressed perfectly in terms of a set of linear functions. Nevertheless, linear programs can provide reasonably realistic representations of many real-world problems — especially if a little creativity is applied in the mathematical formulation of the problem. The subject of modeling was briefly discussed in the context of regulation. The regulation problems you learned to solve were very simple mathematical representations of reality. This chapter continues this trek down the modeling path. As we progress, the models will become more mathematical — and more complex. The real world is always more complex than a model. Thus, as we try to represent the real world more accurately, the models we build will inevitably become more complex. You should remember the maxim discussed earlier that a model should only be as complex as is necessary in order to represent the real world problem reasonably well. Therefore, the added complexity introduced by using linear programming should be accompanied by some significant gains in our ability to represent the problem and, hence, in the quality of the solutions that can be obtained. You should ask yourself, as you learn more about linear programming, what the benefits of the technique are and whether they outweigh the additional costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7. Linear Programming and Reductions
    Chapter 7 Linear programming and reductions Many of the problems for which we want algorithms are optimization tasks: the shortest path, the cheapest spanning tree, the longest increasing subsequence, and so on. In such cases, we seek a solution that (1) satisfies certain constraints (for instance, the path must use edges of the graph and lead from s to t, the tree must touch all nodes, the subsequence must be increasing); and (2) is the best possible, with respect to some well-defined criterion, among all solutions that satisfy these constraints. Linear programming describes a broad class of optimization tasks in which both the con- straints and the optimization criterion are linear functions. It turns out an enormous number of problems can be expressed in this way. Given the vastness of its topic, this chapter is divided into several parts, which can be read separately subject to the following dependencies. Flows and matchings Introduction to linear programming Duality Games and reductions Simplex 7.1 An introduction to linear programming In a linear programming problem we are given a set of variables, and we want to assign real values to them so as to (1) satisfy a set of linear equations and/or linear inequalities involving these variables and (2) maximize or minimize a given linear objective function. 201 202 Algorithms Figure 7.1 (a) The feasible region for a linear program. (b) Contour lines of the objective function: x1 + 6x2 = c for different values of the profit c. x x (a) 2 (b) 2 400 400 Optimum point Profit = $1900 ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ 300 ¢¡¢¡¢¡¢¡¢ 300 ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¢¡¢¡¢¡¢¡¢ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¢¡¢¡¢¡¢¡¢ 200 200 c = 1500 ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¢¡¢¡¢¡¢¡¢ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¢¡¢¡¢¡¢¡¢ c = 1200 ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ 100 ¢¡¢¡¢¡¢¡¢ 100 ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¢¡¢¡¢¡¢¡¢ c = 600 ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¢¡¢¡¢¡¢¡¢ x1 x1 0 100 200 300 400 0 100 200 300 400 7.1.1 Example: profit maximization A boutique chocolatier has two products: its flagship assortment of triangular chocolates, called Pyramide, and the more decadent and deluxe Pyramide Nuit.
    [Show full text]
  • Linear Programming
    Stanford University | CS261: Optimization Handout 5 Luca Trevisan January 18, 2011 Lecture 5 In which we introduce linear programming. 1 Linear Programming A linear program is an optimization problem in which we have a collection of variables, which can take real values, and we want to find an assignment of values to the variables that satisfies a given collection of linear inequalities and that maximizes or minimizes a given linear function. (The term programming in linear programming, is not used as in computer program- ming, but as in, e.g., tv programming, to mean planning.) For example, the following is a linear program. maximize x1 + x2 subject to x + 2x ≤ 1 1 2 (1) 2x1 + x2 ≤ 1 x1 ≥ 0 x2 ≥ 0 The linear function that we want to optimize (x1 + x2 in the above example) is called the objective function.A feasible solution is an assignment of values to the variables that satisfies the inequalities. The value that the objective function gives 1 to an assignment is called the cost of the assignment. For example, x1 := 3 and 1 2 x2 := 3 is a feasible solution, of cost 3 . Note that if x1; x2 are values that satisfy the inequalities, then, by summing the first two inequalities, we see that 3x1 + 3x2 ≤ 2 that is, 1 2 x + x ≤ 1 2 3 2 1 1 and so no feasible solution has cost higher than 3 , so the solution x1 := 3 , x2 := 3 is optimal. As we will see in the next lecture, this trick of summing inequalities to verify the optimality of a solution is part of the very general theory of duality of linear programming.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementing Customized Pivot Rules in COIN-OR's CLP with Python
    Cahier du GERAD G-2012-07 Customizing the Solution Process of COIN-OR's Linear Solvers with Python Mehdi Towhidi1;2 and Dominique Orban1;2 ? 1 Department of Mathematics and Industrial Engineering, Ecole´ Polytechnique, Montr´eal,QC, Canada. 2 GERAD, Montr´eal,QC, Canada. [email protected], [email protected] Abstract. Implementations of the Simplex method differ only in very specific aspects such as the pivot rule. Similarly, most relaxation methods for mixed-integer programming differ only in the type of cuts and the exploration of the search tree. Implementing instances of those frame- works would therefore be more efficient if linear and mixed-integer pro- gramming solvers let users customize such aspects easily. We provide a scripting mechanism to easily implement and experiment with pivot rules for the Simplex method by building upon COIN-OR's open-source linear programming package CLP. Our mechanism enables users to implement pivot rules in the Python scripting language without explicitly interact- ing with the underlying C++ layers of CLP. In the same manner, it allows users to customize the solution process while solving mixed-integer linear programs using the CBC and CGL COIN-OR packages. The Cython pro- gramming language ensures communication between Python and COIN- OR libraries and activates user-defined customizations as callbacks. For illustration, we provide an implementation of a well-known pivot rule as well as the positive edge rule|a new rule that is particularly efficient on degenerate problems, and demonstrate how to customize branch-and-cut node selection in the solution of a mixed-integer program.
    [Show full text]
  • A Branch-And-Bound Algorithm for Zero-One Mixed Integer
    A BRANCH-AND-BOUND ALGORITHM FOR ZERO- ONE MIXED INTEGER PROGRAMMING PROBLEMS Ronald E. Davis Stanford University, Stanford, California David A. Kendrick University of Texas, Austin, Texas and Martin Weitzman Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut (Received August 7, 1969) This paper presents the results of experimentation on the development of an efficient branch-and-bound algorithm for the solution of zero-one linear mixed integer programming problems. An implicit enumeration is em- ployed using bounds that are obtained from the fractional variables in the associated linear programming problem. The principal mathematical result used in obtaining these bounds is the piecewise linear convexity of the criterion function with respect to changes of a single variable in the interval [0, 11. A comparison with the computational experience obtained with several other algorithms on a number of problems is included. MANY IMPORTANT practical problems of optimization in manage- ment, economics, and engineering can be posed as so-called 'zero- one mixed integer problems,' i.e., as linear programming problems in which a subset of the variables is constrained to take on only the values zero or one. When indivisibilities, economies of scale, or combinatoric constraints are present, formulation in the mixed-integer mode seems natural. Such problems arise frequently in the contexts of industrial scheduling, investment planning, and regional location, but they are by no means limited to these areas. Unfortunately, at the present time the performance of most compre- hensive algorithms on this class of problems has been disappointing. This study was undertaken in hopes of devising a more satisfactory approach. In this effort we have drawn on the computational experience of, and the concepts employed in, the LAND AND DoIGE161 Healy,[13] and DRIEBEEKt' I algorithms.
    [Show full text]
  • Production Models: Maximizing Profits
    1 ________________________________________________________________________________________________ Production Models: Maximizing Profits As we saw in the Introduction, mathematical programming is a technique for solving certain kinds of optimization problems Ð maximizing profit, minimizing cost, etc. Ð subject to constraints on resources, capacities, supplies, demands, and the like. AMPL is a language for specifying such mathematical optimization problems. It provides a notation that is very close to the way that you might describe a problem mathematically, so that it is easy to convert from an algebraic description to AMPL. We will concentrate initially on linear programming, which is the best known and eas- iest case; other kinds of mathematical programming are taken up toward the end of the book. This chapter addresses one of the most common applications of linear program- ming: maximizing the profit of some operation, subject to constraints that limit what can be produced. Chapters 2 and 3 are devoted to two other equally common kinds of linear programs, and Chapter 4 shows how linear programming models can be replicated and combined to produce truly large-scale problems. These chapters are written with the beginner in mind, but experienced practitioners of mathematical programming should find them useful as a quick introduction to AMPL. We begin with a linear program (or LP for short) with only two variables, motivated by a mythical steelmaking operation. This will provide a quick review of linear program- ming to refresh your memory if you already have some experience, or to help you get started if you're just learning. We'll show how the same LP can be represented as a gen- eral algebraic model of production, together with specific data.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Linear Programming
    ORF 523 Lecture 9 Princeton University Instructor: A.A. Ahmadi Scribe: G. Hall Any typos should be emailed to a a [email protected]. In this lecture, we see some of the most well-known classes of convex optimization problems and some of their applications. These include: • Linear Programming (LP) • (Convex) Quadratic Programming (QP) • (Convex) Quadratically Constrained Quadratic Programming (QCQP) • Second Order Cone Programming (SOCP) • Semidefinite Programming (SDP) 1 Linear Programming Definition 1. A linear program (LP) is the problem of optimizing a linear function over a polyhedron: min cT x T s.t. ai x ≤ bi; i = 1; : : : ; m; or written more compactly as min cT x s.t. Ax ≤ b; for some A 2 Rm×n; b 2 Rm: We'll be very brief on our discussion of LPs since this is the central topic of ORF 522. It suffices to say that LPs probably still take the top spot in terms of ubiquity of applications. Here are a few examples: • A variety of problems in production planning and scheduling 1 • Exact formulation of several important combinatorial optimization problems (e.g., min-cut, shortest path, bipartite matching) • Relaxations for all 0/1 combinatorial programs • Subroutines of branch-and-bound algorithms for integer programming • Relaxations for cardinality constrained (compressed sensing type) optimization prob- lems • Computing Nash equilibria in zero-sum games • ::: 2 Quadratic Programming Definition 2. A quadratic program (QP) is an optimization problem with a quadratic ob- jective and linear constraints min xT Qx + qT x + c x s.t. Ax ≤ b: Here, we have Q 2 Sn×n, q 2 Rn; c 2 R;A 2 Rm×n; b 2 Rm: The difficulty of this problem changes drastically depending on whether Q is positive semidef- inite (psd) or not.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes 1: Introduction to Optimization Models
    Notes 1: Introduction to Optimization Models IND E 599 September 29, 2010 IND E 599 Notes 1 Slide 1 Course Objectives I Survey of optimization models and formulations, with focus on modeling, not on algorithms I Include a variety of applications, such as, industrial, mechanical, civil and electrical engineering, financial optimization models, health care systems, environmental ecology, and forestry I Include many types of optimization models, such as, linear programming, integer programming, quadratic assignment problem, nonlinear convex problems and black-box models I Include many common formulations, such as, facility location, vehicle routing, job shop scheduling, flow shop scheduling, production scheduling (min make span, min max lateness), knapsack/multi-knapsack, traveling salesman, capacitated assignment problem, set covering/packing, network flow, shortest path, and max flow. IND E 599 Notes 1 Slide 2 Tentative Topics Each topic is an introduction to what could be a complete course: 1. basic linear models (LP) with sensitivity analysis 2. integer models (IP), such as the assignment problem, knapsack problem and the traveling salesman problem 3. mixed integer formulations 4. quadratic assignment problems 5. include uncertainty with chance-constraints, stochastic programming scenario-based formulations, and robust optimization 6. multi-objective formulations 7. nonlinear formulations, as often found in engineering design 8. brief introduction to constraint logic programming 9. brief introduction to dynamic programming IND E 599 Notes 1 Slide 3 Computer Software I Catalyst Tools (https://catalyst.uw.edu/) I AIMMS - optimization software (http://www.aimms.com/) Ming Fang - AIMMS software consultant IND E 599 Notes 1 Slide 4 What is Mathematical Programming? Mathematical programming refers to \programming" as a \planning" activity: as in I linear programming (LP) I integer programming (IP) I mixed integer linear programming (MILP) I non-linear programming (NLP) \Optimization" is becoming more common, e.g.
    [Show full text]