Listing in Korea a Guide to Listing on the Korean Exchange

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Listing in Korea a Guide to Listing on the Korean Exchange www.samil.com Listing in Korea A Guide to Listing on the Korean Exchange Table of Contents Introduction 01 01. Status of foreign issuers in Korea 05 02. Listing requirements 07 03. IPO Process tailored for Foreign Entities 14 04. Listing procedures 15 05. Continuing obligation 16 06. What help you should seek 18 07. What we can do 19 08. PricewaterhouseCoopers 20 09. Our Experts 21 Introduction Korea Exchange (KRX) ∙ In 1956, the Korean stock market opened with the start of Korea Stock Exchange. In January 2005, through integration of Korea Stock Exchange and two other domestic markets, the Korea Exchange (KRX) was created. ∙ There are four markets in the KRX; Main Board (KOSPI Market), KOSDAQ (Korea Securities Dealers Automated Quotation), KONEX (Korea new exchange) and the derivatives market. ∙ The KRX is one of the most liquid stock exchanges. Numerous companies from various industries completed their IPOs successfully on KRX. ∙ Since 2007, the KRX has been actively promoting foreign companies’ inbound IPOs to grow as an international stock exchange, be popular among foreign companies and attract international investors (Since IPO of 3Nod - a Chinese company - in 2007, a total of 29 foreign companies have listed on the KRX as of June 30, 2017) ∙ In order to further enhance its credibility on the international platform and be leading global capital market, KRX has also signed MOUs with other global stock exchanges for mutual cooperation in areas such as information sharing, IT consulting, market links, development of new products, and any other mutually beneficial projects. Main Board (KOSPI Market) ∙ The KOSPI market is the main board of KRX and many of the larger domestic and international companies such as Samsung Electronics, LG Electronics, Hyundai Motor, POSCO and KIA Motors are listed on KOSPI. ∙ As of June 30, 2017, 766 companies are listed with total market capitalization amounting to KRW 1,308 trillion and the transaction volume in 2016 amounting to KRW 1,113 trillion. KOSDAQ Market ∙ The KOSDAQ market opened in 1996 to support venture and small and medium-sized companies’ smooth financing. ∙ IPO requirement for the KOSDAQ market is less rigorous than the requirements for the KOSPI market, enabling 1,230 of middle-sized companies with high potential to be listed. As of June 30, 2017, total market capitalization amounts to KRW 222 trillion and the transaction volume in 2016 amounts to KRW 835 trillion. KONEX Market ∙ The KRX opened KONEX market in 2013 to support small and middle-sized start-ups to raise capital. ∙ IPO requirement for the KONEX market is less rigorous than the requirements for the KOSDAQ market, enabling 149 of small and middle-sized or start-up companies with high potential to be listed. As of June 30, 2017, total market capitalization amounts to KRW 4.2 trillion and the transaction volume in 2016 amounts to KRW 607 billion. 1 Comparison with major Asian stock exchanges “The Korea exchange is one of the most liquid markets in the Asia region” Due to stagnant market during the recent past 4~5 years, turnover ratio has decreased compared to being the most liquid market in 2011 in the Asia region. However, KRX is still one of the most liquid markets and introduction of stock market stimulus plan, such as the recent expanded price limits from 15% to 30%, it is expected to further improve its liquidity. (in millions of USD, %) 8,000,000 1.83 2 7,000,000 1.8 1.6 6,000,000 1.33 1.4 1.14 5,000,000 1.2 4,000,000 1 3,000,000 0.61 0.42 0.8 0.6 2,000,000 0.31 0.4 1,000,000 0.2 0 0 Singapore Taiwan Korea Hong Kong Shanghai Tokyo A=annual transaction volume B=market capitalization Performances as at year end 2016 (in millions of USD, %) Hong Singapore Taiwan Korea Shanghai Tokyo Kong A=annual transaction 196,933 511,973 1,664,872 1,349,804 7,510,105 5,625,901 volume B=market 640,428 844,030 1,254,541 3,193,236 4,098,789 4,955,300 capitalization Turnover 0.31 0.61 1.33 0.42 1.83 1.14 ratio(A/B) (Source: The World Federation of Exchanges – www.world-exchanges.org) 2 Number of IPOs on KRX (2011~June 2017) In 2012, there were sharp decrease in the number of IPOs due to the European sovereign debt crisis and global economic slowdown but gradually recovering since 2013 as a result of KRX’s active marketing, high price earnings ratios (PER) for IT company stocks and low listing costs. In 2016, the number of IPOs decreased by 31% compared to the number in 2015, however, the total amount of offering increased by 43% compared to 2015. 120 120 100 100 80 80 60 54 52 60 35 38 38 40 33 40 26 28 22 21 21 20 12 13 13 20 8 4 7 5 1 2 2 1 0 3 3 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 3 - 0 0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 June 2017 Manufacturing Services Financial Services Wholesale & Retail Others Total Number of IPOs by industry (2011~June 2017) Financial Wholesale & Year Manufacturing Services Others Total Services Retail 2011 54 12 1 4 2 73 2012 22 2 1 0 3 28 2013 33 3 2 1 1 40 2014 35 7 26 2 2 72 2015 52 21 38 5 2 118 2016 38 28 13 1 1 81 January to 21 8 13 3 - 45 June 2017 (Source: KRX) 3 Overview by market & industry (December 2016) (in millions of KRW) Market Industry Group Market Cap PER Agricultural, fisheries and forestry industry 15,314,059 16.8 Communication 34,404,847 12.3 Construction 23,356,077 19.5 Distribution 63,095,667 16.4 KOSPI Electricity & Gas 40,072,857 14.2 Market Finance 145,203,569 10.8 Manufacturing industry 631,228,303 11.1 Mining industry 28,419,211 4.9 Service 87,042,316 20.4 Transport & Storage 18,997,854 -13.4 Agricultural, fisheries and forestry industry 1,053,823 21.3 Communication 9,127,815 -46.8 Construction 5,357,471 -194.1 Distribution 5,137,137 19.4 KOSDAQ Market Electricity & Gas 735,781 38.7 Finance 2,364,596 2.4 Manufacturing industry 100,912,042 54.7 Mining industry 3,906,387 28.8 Service 40,815,372 62.9 Transport & Storage 720,831 41.8 (Source: Bloomberg) 4 01. Status of foreign issuers in Korea As of June 30, 2017, total of foreign companies listed on KRX (in %, 100 millions of KRW) Offer Price*² of Debt/ Net N Listing Revenue Market Name Country Price*² June ’17 Equity Income o Date *³ (KRW) (KRW) Ratio (%)*³ *³ 1 KOSDAQ China Great China 2009. 05 1,700 1,485 23.13 5,783 549 S&C Engine 2 KOSDAQ China 2009. 12 6,000 1,130 4.93 1,676.3 279.4 Group Ltd 3 KOSDAQ Global SM Tech China 2009. 12 3,200 1,470 57.01 1,095.1 43.7 China Hao Ran 4 KOSDAQ China 2010. 02 4,700 982 56.80 4,124.6 259.1 Recycling CKH Food & 5 KOSDAQ China 2010. 03 3,700 1,340 4.38 2,976.0 524.0 Health Ltd 6 KOSDAQ New Pride Corp USA 2010. 04 7,500 2,280 178.03 616.8 181.4 East Asia 7 KOSDAQ Holdings China 2010. 04 5,000 718 10.40 1,084.2 45.2 Investment Wayport HK Co 8 KOSDAQ China 2010. 07 1,400 3,020 1,392.81 2,068.4 (45.4) Ltd 9 KOSPI Kolao Holdings Laos 2010. 11 4,800 6,360 57.53 3,923.3 416.2 Wanli 10 KOSDAQ International China 2011. 06 4,100 1,210 156.20 1,609.9 188.7 Holdings Ltd SBI AXES Co 11 KOSDAQ Japan 2012. 12 3,600 5,680 264.29 689.8 42.9 Ltd 12 KOSDAQ Access Bio Inc USA 2013. 05 4,500 4,700 58.26 324.9 (11.5) China Crystal 13 KOSDAQ New Material China 2016. 01 3,000 2,795 12.56 644.4 263.5 Holdings Rothwell 14 KOSDAQ International Co China 2016. 06 3,200 2,405 47.47 1,658.7 305.3 Ltd Heng Sheng 15 KOSDAQ Holding Group China 2016. 08 3,600 2,840 65.36 2,013.0 285.7 Ltd Englewood LAB 16 KOSDAQ USA 2016. 10 6,000 7,600 12.90 791.8 (2.8) Inc Cayman Golden Cayman 17 KOSDAQ 2016. 10 3,500 3,940 14.36 262.8 21.0 Century Wheel Islands Great Rich 18 KOSDAQ China 2016. 10 5,000 3,615 56.83 1,644.7 350.5 Technologies Ltd Organic Tea 19 KOSDAQ Cosmetics China 2016. 11 4,000 3,915 372.42 15.2 (5.9) Holdings China Ocean 20 KOSPI Resources Co China 2009. 05 - - - - - Ltd*¹ *¹ China Ocean Resources Co Ltd was delisted in September 2017 *² Price per share *³ Financial information of 2016 (Source: Bloomberg) 5 IPOs of foreign companies on KRX by year 35 29 30 25 22 22 22 21 21 20 15 10 7 5 1 0 0 0 ~ FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 Newly listed Accumulation June ~ FY2012 FY2013 FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 Total 2017 Newly listed 21 1 0 0 7 0 29 Delisted 4 3 1 1 0 0 9 Note: Four companies delisted voluntarily (3NOD Digital, China Food Packaging Inc, Cowell e holdings, and SBI Mortgage); three companies delisted due to disclaimer audit opinion (United Technology Holdings, Shenglong, China Gaoxian Fibre Fabric); One delisted due to embezzlement (Nepro IT); One delisted due to failing to meet the market capitalization requirement (Huafung).
Recommended publications
  • Global Exchange Indices
    Global Exchange Indices Country Exchange Index Argentina Buenos MERVAL, BURCAP Aires Stock Exchange Australia Australian S&P/ASX All Ordinaries, S&P/ASX Small Ordinaries, Stock S&P/ASX Small Resources, S&P/ASX Small Exchange Industriials, S&P/ASX 20, S&P/ASX 50, S&P/ASX MIDCAP 50, S&P/ASX MIDCAP 50 Resources, S&P/ASX MIDCAP 50 Industrials, S&P/ASX All Australian 50, S&P/ASX 100, S&P/ASX 100 Resources, S&P/ASX 100 Industrials, S&P/ASX 200, S&P/ASX All Australian 200, S&P/ASX 200 Industrials, S&P/ASX 200 Resources, S&P/ASX 300, S&P/ASX 300 Industrials, S&P/ASX 300 Resources Austria Vienna Stock ATX, ATX Five, ATX Prime, Austrian Traded Index, CECE Exchange Overall Index, CECExt Index, Chinese Traded Index, Czech Traded Index, Hungarian Traded Index, Immobilien ATX, New Europe Blue Chip Index, Polish Traded Index, Romanian Traded Index, Russian Depository Extended Index, Russian Depository Index, Russian Traded Index, SE Europe Traded Index, Serbian Traded Index, Vienna Dynamic Index, Weiner Boerse Index Belgium Euronext Belgium All Share, Belgium BEL20, Belgium Brussels Continuous, Belgium Mid Cap, Belgium Small Cap Brazil Sao Paulo IBOVESPA Stock Exchange Canada Toronto S&P/TSX Capped Equity Index, S&P/TSX Completion Stock Index, S&P/TSX Composite Index, S&P/TSX Equity 60 Exchange Index S&P/TSX 60 Index, S&P/TSX Equity Completion Index, S&P/TSX Equity SmallCap Index, S&P/TSX Global Gold Index, S&P/TSX Global Mining Index, S&P/TSX Income Trust Index, S&P/TSX Preferred Share Index, S&P/TSX SmallCap Index, S&P/TSX Composite GICS Sector Indexes
    [Show full text]
  • FTSE Korea 30/18 Capped
    2 FTSE Russell Publications 19 August 2021 FTSE Korea 30/18 Capped Indicative Index Weight Data as at Closing on 30 June 2021 Index weight Index weight Index weight Constituent Country Constituent Country Constituent Country (%) (%) (%) Alteogen 0.19 KOREA Hyundai Engineering & Construction 0.35 KOREA NH Investment & Securities 0.14 KOREA AmoreG 0.15 KOREA Hyundai Glovis 0.32 KOREA NHN 0.07 KOREA Amorepacific Corp 0.65 KOREA Hyundai Heavy Industries 0.29 KOREA Nong Shim 0.08 KOREA Amorepacific Pfd. 0.08 KOREA Hyundai Marine & Fire Insurance 0.13 KOREA OCI 0.17 KOREA BGF Retail 0.09 KOREA Hyundai Merchant Marine 1.02 KOREA Orion 0.21 KOREA BNK Financial Group 0.18 KOREA Hyundai Mipo Dockyard 0.15 KOREA Ottogi 0.06 KOREA Celltrion Healthcare 0.68 KOREA Hyundai Mobis 1.53 KOREA Paradise 0.07 KOREA Celltrion Inc 2.29 KOREA Hyundai Motor 2.74 KOREA Posco 1.85 KOREA Celltrion Pharm 0.24 KOREA Hyundai Motor 2nd Pfd. 0.33 KOREA Posco Chemical 0.32 KOREA Cheil Worldwide 0.14 KOREA Hyundai Motor Pfd. 0.21 KOREA Posco International 0.09 KOREA CJ Cheiljedang 0.3 KOREA Hyundai Steel 0.33 KOREA S1 Corporation 0.13 KOREA CJ CheilJedang Pfd. 0.02 KOREA Hyundai Wia 0.13 KOREA Samsung Biologics 0.92 KOREA CJ Corp 0.11 KOREA Industrial Bank of Korea 0.22 KOREA Samsung C&T 0.94 KOREA CJ ENM 0.15 KOREA Kakao 3.65 KOREA Samsung Card 0.08 KOREA CJ Logistics 0.12 KOREA Kangwon Land 0.23 KOREA Samsung Electro-Mechanics 0.81 KOREA Coway 0.36 KOREA KB Financial Group 1.78 KOREA Samsung Electronics 25.36 KOREA Daewoo Engineering & Construction 0.12 KOREA KCC Corp 0.12 KOREA Samsung Electronics Pfd.
    [Show full text]
  • Scanned Image
    3130 W 57th St, Suite 105 Sioux Falls, SD 57108 Voice: 605-373-0201 Fax: 605-271-5721 [email protected] www.greatplainsfa.com Securities offered through First Heartland Capital, Inc. Member FINRA & SIPC. Advisory Services offered through First Heartland Consultants, Inc. Great Plains Financial Advisors, LLC is not affiliated with First Heartland Capital, Inc. In this month’s recap: the Federal Reserve eases, stocks reach historic peaks, and face-to-face U.S.-China trade talks formally resume. Monthly Economic Update Presented by Craig Heien with Great Plains Financial Advisors, August 2019 THE MONTH IN BRIEF July was a positive month for stocks and a notable month for news impacting the financial markets. The S&P 500 topped the 3,000 level for the first time. The Federal Reserve cut the country’s benchmark interest rate. Consumer confidence remained strong. Trade representatives from China and the U.S. once again sat down at the negotiating table, as new data showed China’s economy lagging. In Europe, Brexit advocate Boris Johnson was elected as the new Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, and the European Central Bank indicated that it was open to using various options to stimulate economic activity.1 DOMESTIC ECONOMIC HEALTH On July 31, the Federal Reserve cut interest rates for the first time in more than a decade. The Federal Open Market Committee approved a quarter-point reduction to the federal funds rate by a vote of 8-2. Typically, the central bank eases borrowing costs when it senses the business cycle is slowing. As the country has gone ten years without a recession, some analysts viewed this rate cut as a preventative measure.
    [Show full text]
  • New Years Trading Schedule 2021
    New Years Trading Schedule 2021 Product Thurs Dec 31st Fri Jan 1st Mon Jan 4th Tues Jan 5th Australian Securities Exchange | ASX 9:30pm Wednesday Night All Products Early Close Closed Normal Hours Normal Hours Chicago Mercantile Exchange | CME Currency & Eurodollar Normal Hours Closed Normal Hours Normal Hours Equity Index Normal Hours Closed Normal Hours Normal Hours Livestock 8:30am Livestock & Lumber Normal Hours Closed Open/Lumber 9am Open Normal Hours Dairy 1:55pm Early Close Closed Normal Hours Normal Hours Globex Bitcoin Normal Hours Closed Normal Hours Normal Hours Globex Currency & Eurodollar Normal Hours Closed Normal Hours Normal Hours Globex Equity Index Normal Hours Closed Normal Hours Normal Hours Pre-Open 8am - Livestock 8:30am Open/Pre-Open Globex Livestock & Lumber Normal Hours Closed 6am - Lumber 9am Open Normal Hours Globex Dairy 1:55pm Early Close Closed Normal Hours Normal Hours Chicago Board of Options Exchange | CBOE CBOE/CFE 12:15pm Early Close Closed Normal Hours Normal Hours Chicago Board of Trade | CBOT Treasuries Normal Hours Closed Normal Hours Normal Hours Grains Normal Hours Closed 8:30am Open Normal Hours Globex Treasuries Normal Hours Closed Normal Hours Normal Hours MGEX Wheat Pre-Open 7:45am/Pre-Open 8:00am - Globex Grains Normal Hours Closed 8:30am Open Normal Hours Montreal Exchange | MX Interest Rates 12:30pm Early Close Closed Normal Hours Normal Hours Stock Indices Normal Hours Closed Normal Hours Normal Hours ICE Futures Canada | ICE All Products Normal Hours Closed Normal Hours Normal Hours European
    [Show full text]
  • Posco International Corporation
    POSCO INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION Sustainability Report 2019 About This Report The 2019 POSCO INTERNATIONAL Sustainability Report, the forth annual publication, illustrate the Company’s performance fulfill- ing its economic, social, and environmental responsibility. POSCO INTERNATIONAL aims to transparently disclose its sustainability management activities for the year 2019 and communicate with wide-ranging stakeholders. Reporting Guidelines Global Reporting Initiative(GRI) Standards: Core Option Reporting Period January 1, 2019 ~ December 31, 2019 * 2017 ~ H1 of 2020 for a portion of the performance data Reporting Scope Economy: On a consolidated basis in accordance with the K-IFRS 〮 Society & Environment: POSCO INTERNATIONAL Headquarters, 〮 POSCO SPS1), and overseas worksites (Myanmar, Indonesia, and Uzbekistan) Areas where major operations are based: Republic of Korea 〮 1) This refers to the STS Division, the TMC Division and the Plate Fabrication Division that were split off as subsidiaries in April 2020. Reporting Cycle Annually(publication of the most recent report: 2019) Assurance Financial data: Earnst & Young Han Young 〮 Non-financial data: DNV GL 〮 Contact Details Address: 165 Convensia-daero(POSCO Tower-Songdo), Yeonsu-gu, Incheon, Republic of Korea Tel: +82-2-759-2861 Department in charge: Sustainability Management Section E-mail: [email protected] POSCO INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION Sustainability Report 2019 03 Global CSR Activities 01 We Make Sustainability 02 Sustainability Management Strategy 102 Global CSR Overview
    [Show full text]
  • Holdings-Report.Pdf
    The Fund is a closed-end exchange traded management Investment company. This material is presented only to provide information and is not intended for trading purposes. Closed-end funds, unlike open-end funds are not continuously offered. After the initial public offering, shares are sold on the open market through a stock exchange. Changes to investment policies, current management fees, and other matters of interest to investors may be found in each closed-end fund's most recent report to shareholders. Holdings are subject to change daily. PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS FOR THE KOREA FUND as of July 31, 2021 *Note: Cash (including for these purposes cash equivalents) is not included. Security Description Shares/Par Value Base Market Value (USD) Percent of Base Market Value SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO 793,950 54,183,938.27 20.99 SK HYNIX INC COMMON 197,500 19,316,452.95 7.48 NAVER CORP COMMON STOCK 37,800 14,245,859.60 5.52 LG CHEM LTD COMMON STOCK 15,450 11,309,628.34 4.38 HANA FINANCIAL GROUP INC 225,900 8,533,236.25 3.31 SK INNOVATION CO LTD 38,200 8,402,173.44 3.26 KIA CORP COMMON STOCK 107,000 7,776,744.19 3.01 HYUNDAI MOBIS CO LTD 26,450 6,128,167.79 2.37 HYUNDAI MOTOR CO 66,700 6,030,688.98 2.34 NCSOFT CORP COMMON STOCK 8,100 5,802,564.66 2.25 SAMSUNG BIOLOGICS CO LTD 7,230 5,594,175.18 2.17 KB FINANCIAL GROUP INC 123,000 5,485,677.03 2.13 KAKAO CORP COMMON STOCK 42,700 5,456,987.61 2.11 HUGEL INC COMMON STOCK 24,900 5,169,415.34 2.00 SAMSUNG 29,900 4,990,915.02 1.93 SK TELECOM CO LTD COMMON 17,500 4,579,439.25 1.77 KOREA INVESTMENT 53,100 4,427,115.84
    [Show full text]
  • Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018-2019
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 07/29/2021 and available online at federalregister.gov/d/2021-16172, and onBILLINGgovinfo.gov CODE: 3510-DS-P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-580-881] Certain Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018-2019 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that certain cold-rolled steel flat products (cold-rolled steel) from the Republic of Korea were not sold in the United States at prices below normal value during the period of review (POR), September 1, 2018, through August 31, 2019. DATES: Applicable [INSERT DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael J. Heaney, George McMahon, or Marc Castillo, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4475, (202) 482-1167, or (202) 482-5019, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On January 25, 2021, Commerce published the Preliminary Results of this administrative review.1 We invited interested parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. Between February 24, and March 5, 2021, Commerce received timely filed case briefs and rebuttal briefs from United States Steel Corporation (U.S. Steel), additional domestic parties,2 Hyundai Steel 1 See Certain Cold Rolled Steel Flat Products from the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018-2019, 86 FR 6871 (January 25, 2021) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM).
    [Show full text]
  • Korean Multinationals Show Solid Recovery After Global Crisis
    Korean multinationals show solid recovery after global crisis Report dated November 16, 2010 EMBARGO: The contents of this report must not be quoted or summarized in the print, broadcast or electronic media before November 16, 2010, 10:00 a.m. Seoul; 1 a.m. GMT, and 9:00 p.m. November 15, 2010, New York. Seoul and New York, November 16, 2010 The Institute of International Affairs of the Graduate School of International Studies (GSIS) at Seoul National University in Seoul, and the Vale Columbia Center on Sustainable International Investment (VCC) at Columbia University in New York, are releasing the first annual report on leading Korean multinationals. The research for this report was conducted in 2010 and covers the period 2007 to 2009. 1 Highlights The Republic of Korea (henceforth ‘Korea’), the 11 th largest economy in the world, has now become one of the leading investors abroad. The number and the size of the corporate giants that dominate the economy have increased over the years, boosting and diversifying their investments around the world. Korea’s multinational enterprises ranked by their foreign assets (see table 1 below) show about USD 93 billion in assets held abroad. 2 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (SEC), a member of a leading Korean conglomerate, ranked 1 st with slightly over USD 18 billion, followed by another top conglomerate member, LG Electronics, with over USD 10 billion dollars. Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd, and DSME Co., Ltd, had foreign assets of over USD 8 billion each and LG Display had over USD 6 billion. The top five firms together accounted for just over half of the total foreign assets of the top 20 companies.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    The Journal of Applied Business Research – September/October 2017 Volume 33, Number 5 The Effect Of Corporate Governance On Unfaithful Disclosure Designation And Unfaithful Disclosure Penalty Points Bo Young Moon, Dankook University, South Korea Soo Yeon Park, Korea University, South Korea ABSTRACT This paper investigates the relation between Unfaithful Disclosure Corporations (“UDC”) and corporate governance using listed firm (KOSPI and KOSDAQ) data in Korea. Prior literature reports that corporate governance has an impact on the level of disclosure and the quality of disclosure provided by companies. However, it is hard to find the studies about corporate governance and UDC at the term of disclosure quality. Compare to some financially advanced countries, Korea established corporate governance in a relatively short period of time; hence concerns have been raised the corporate governance have not played effective role to monitor management. We question how corporate governance affects companies’ unfaithful disclosure by using several corporate governance proxy variables and UDC data which is unique system in Korea. From the empirical tests, we find a negative association between the proportion of outside directors, an indicator of the board’s independence, and UDC designation, among companies listed on both KOSPI and KOSDAQ. On the other hand, there is a significant positive association between the proportion of outside directors and UDCs’ imposed and accumulated penalty points among KOSDAQ-listed companies. This implies that outside director system effectively play a monitoring role however due to different natures of members included in outside directors, the system often fails to control regarding based reasons for penalty points imposition. In addition, we find the percentage of foreign equity ownership showed statistically significant positive association with UDC designation and a significant positive association with the imposed and accumulated penalty points among KOSPI-listed companies.
    [Show full text]
  • Does the Market React Differently to Chaebol Firms?
    The Journal of Applied Business Research – September/October 2014 Volume 30, Number 5 Does The Market React Differently To Chaebol Firms? Heejin Park, Hanyang University, South Korea Jinsoo Kim, Hanyang University, South Korea Mihye Ha, Hanyang University, South Korea Sambock Park, Hanyang University, South Korea ABSTRACT Based on a sample of Korean firms listed on the KOSPI and KOSDAQ from 2001 to 2011, we examined whether the affiliation of a firm with a Chaebol group affects the sensitivity of stock prices to earnings surprises. We found that the market response to positive (negative) earnings surprises is more positive (negative) for Chaebol firms than for non-Chaebol firms. In addition, we investigated how intra-group transactions affect the ERCs of Chaebol firms by comparing with those of non-Chaebol firms. Our results show that the intra-group transactions of Chaebol firms are positively related to ERCs under both positive and negative earnings surprises. However, we did not find the same results from the analyses of non-Chaebol firms. Keywords: Chaebol Firms; Earnings Response Coefficient (ERC); Earnings Surprises; KOSPI; KOSDAQ 1. INTRODUCTION he aim of this study is to examine how differently the market reacts to earnings surprises of Chaebol firms compared to those of non-Chaebol firms. Although there is no official definition of Chaebol, T firms are perceived as Chaebol if they consist of a large group and operate in many different industries, maintain substantial business ties with other firms in their group, and are controlled by the largest shareholder as a whole. The definition used to identify Chaebol firms is that of a large business group established by the Korea Fair Trade Commission (KFTC) and a group of companies of which more than 30% of the shares are owned by the group’s controlling shareholders and its affiliated companies.
    [Show full text]
  • Additional Provisions Applicable When Trading Asian Markets Using Electronic Connectivity
    ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS APPLICABLE WHEN TRADING ASIAN MARKETS USING ELECTRONIC CONNECTIVITY A. Rules for Trading on Asian markets 1. Applicable Law You acknowledge and agree that you must comply in all respects with Applicable Law, including in relation to short sales of securities when using the Trading System. 2. Asian Exchange “Asian Exchange” means exchanges, markets or associations of dealers to which the Relevant JPMorgan Entity (either directly or through its agents) from time to time provides DMA to Client for the purchase and sale of securities, including, without limitation, exchanges in Australia, Hong Kong, Japan, Korea, Singapore, Taiwan, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand and/or such other countries as may be determined from time to time. 3. Relevant JPMorgan Entity “Relevant JPMorgan Entity” means any one or more of the JPMorgan brokers with whom you have a contractual relationship to trade securities electronically, and for the avoidance of doubt may include, without limitation, any one or more of the following: J.P. Morgan Securities Australia Limited, J.P. Morgan Securities Singapore Private Limited, JPMorgan Securities Japan Co. Ltd., J.P. Morgan Securities (Asia Pacific) Limited, J.P. Morgan Broking (Hong Kong) Limited, J.P. Morgan Securities (Far East) Ltd., Seoul Branch, J.P. Morgan Securities (Taiwan) Limited, J.P. Morgan India Private Limited, PT J.P. Morgan Securities Indonesia, JPMorgan Securities (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd., JPMorgan Securities (Thailand) Limited and any of their successors or assigns. B. Rules for Trading on Australian Markets 1. Prohibited conduct 1.1 You must not, and must procure that your Representatives do not, take any action or omit to take any action so that you breach any Applicable Law and in particular you must advise Relevant JPMorgan Entity immediately if you believe that you or any of your Representatives have breached, or may breach, any provision of this Clause 1.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report Amending ITS on Main Indices and Recognised Exchanges
    Final Report Amendment to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1646 11 December 2019 | ESMA70-156-1535 Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................... 4 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 5 3 Main indices ................................................................................................................... 6 3.1 General approach ................................................................................................... 6 3.2 Analysis ................................................................................................................... 7 3.3 Conclusions............................................................................................................. 8 4 Recognised exchanges .................................................................................................. 9 4.1 General approach ................................................................................................... 9 4.2 Conclusions............................................................................................................. 9 4.2.1 Treatment of third-country exchanges .............................................................. 9 4.2.2 Impact of Brexit ...............................................................................................10 5 Annexes ........................................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]