The Genera Oxystegus and Pseudosymblepharis (Pottiaceae, Bryophyta) in the Caucasus Роды Oxystegus И Pseudosymblepharis (Pottiaceae, Bryophyta) На Кавказе Elena A
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
An Overview of Family Pottiaceae (Bryopsida) in Central India with Special Reference to Pachmarhi Biosphere Reserve (PBR)
Lindbergia 34: 30–39, 2011 ISSN 0105-0761 Accepted 11 January 2011 An overview of family Pottiaceae (Bryopsida) in central India with special reference to Pachmarhi Biosphere Reserve (PBR) Virendra Nath, A. K. Asthana and Reesa Gupta V. Nath, A. K. Asthana ([email protected]) and R. Gupta, Bryology Laboratory, National Botanical Research Inst., 226 001 Lucknow, India. The family Pottiaceae is one of the dominant acrocarpous moss family of India, with approximately 26 genera and 130 species being encountered. The present work intends to take up distribution of the members of the family in the central Indian region with nearly 22 taxa being reported earlier. Achanakmar – Amarkantak Biosphere Reserve, Bhimbetka world heritage site, Gujarat, Mt. Abu and Pachmarhi Biosphere Reserve (PBR) are some important hotspots of bryophyte vegetation in central India. Among these, PBR listed under UNESCO’s Man and Biosphere (MAB) Programme is an important site of bryophyte vegetation. Mosses of PBR however have not been studied until now. Here we assess the status of family Pottiaceae in central Indian zone along with providing an illustrated account of eight species encountered from PBR. Among these, Hyophila spathulata (Harv.) Jaeg. and Oxystegus teneuirostre (Hook. et Tayl.) A.J.E. Smith are new additions to central India, while Semibarbula ranuii Gangulee and Weissia edentula Mitt. are being reported from PBR for the first time. India is well known for its floristic diversity of various plant betka world heritage site (Nath and Bansal 2009), 11 taxa groups. Indian researchers have broadly divided India into from Mt. Abu (Chaudhary and Deora 2001) and eight eight bryo-geographical regions (Singh 1997). -
Liverworts, Mosses and Hornworts of Afghanistan - Our Present Knowledge
ISSN 2336-3193 Acta Mus. Siles. Sci. Natur., 68: 11-24, 2019 DOI: 10.2478/cszma-2019-0002 Published: online 1 July 2019, print July 2019 Liverworts, mosses and hornworts of Afghanistan - our present knowledge Harald Kürschner & Wolfgang Frey Liverworts, mosses and hornworts of Afghanistan ‒ our present knowledge. – Acta Mus. Siles. Sci. Natur., 68: 11-24, 2019. Abstract: A new bryophyte checklist for Afghanistan is presented, including all published records since the beginning of collection activities in 1839 ‒1840 by W. Griffith till present. Considering several unidentified collections in various herbaria, 23 new records for Afghanistan together with the collection data can be added to the flora. Beside a new genus, Asterella , the new records include Amblystegium serpens var. serpens, Brachythecium erythrorrhizon, Bryum dichotomum, B. elwendicum, B. pallens, B. weigelii, Dichodontium palustre, Didymodon luridus, D. tectorum, Distichium inclinatum, Entosthodon muhlenbergii, Hygroamblystegium fluviatile subsp. fluviatile, Oncophorus virens, Orthotrichum rupestre var. sturmii, Pogonatum urnigerum, Pseudocrossidium revolutum, Pterygoneurum ovatum, Schistidium rivulare, Syntrichia handelii, Tortella inflexa, T. tortuosa, and Tortula muralis subsp. obtusifolia . Therewith the number of species increase to 24 liverworts, 246 mosses and one hornwort. In addition, a historical overview of the country's exploration and a full biogeography of Afghan bryophytes is given. Key words: Bryophytes, checklist, flora, phytodiversity. Introduction Recording, documentation, identification and classification of organisms is a primary tool and essential step in plant sciences and ecology to obtain detailed knowledge on the flora of a country. In many countries, such as Afghanistan, however, our knowledge on plant diversity, function, interactions of species and number of species in ecosystems is very limited and far from being complete. -
Bryologicalmonograph Bryophyte Checklist of Northern Africa
Journal of Bryology (1999) 21: 207-244 BryologicalMonograph Bryophyte checklist of Northern Africa ROSA MARIA ROS, MARIA J. CANO and JUAN GUERRA Universidad de Murcia, Spain SUMMARY A bryophyte checklist of Northern Africa has been compiled based on the published literature. On the basis of this catalogue 5 hornworts, 171 liverworts and 706 mosses are reported for the area (total number 882). It includes Algeria (648 taxa), Egypt (excluding the Sinai Peninsula, 156 taxa), Libya (138 taxa), Mauritania (5 taxa), Morocco (594 taxa), Spanish territories in North Africa (58 taxa), Tunisia (336 taxa), Western Sahara (0 taxa), and the Saharan part of Chad (88 taxa), Mali (4 taxa) and Niger (4 taxa). Several new combinations are required following publication of this checklist. Type material of these taxa was not studied, therefore they are listed under their illegitimate names, but with their probable correct positions indicated. KEYWORDS: North Africa, Mediterranean region, checklist, bryophyte flora. INTRODUCTION concept of Afr 1 in Diill (1983, 1984, 1985, 1992). The Macaronesian Islands have usually been treated in a differ- A checklist has been compiled as a first step to making ent way in recent years, being totally or partially included more accessible the numerous data published on the bryo- in European checklists or in separate catalogues (e.g. phyte flora of the countries of Northern Africa. Although Eggers, 1982; Dirkse, Bouman & Losada-Lima, 1993). some partial checklists have been published, the literature The checklist of Jelenc (1955a), and subsequent additions is very dispersed and is often difficult to access because (Jelenc, 1967) which include Algeria, Tunisia, Morocco, most of the papers are very old and/or were published in and Sahara was taken as a starting point. -
(Musci, Pottiaceae) in Africa
Taxonomic revision of Chionoloma 35 Tropical Bryology 26: 35-38, 2005 A taxonomic revision of the genus Chionoloma Dixon (Musci, Pottiaceae) in Africa Philip Sollman Notarisappel 2, 9076 LB St. Anna Parochie, The Netherlands Abstract: The African taxa of the genus Chionoloma Dixon are revised. Eleven taxa are proposed as new synonyms. Only one taxon is recognized: Chionoloma bombayense (Müll.Hal.) P.Sollm. Introduction Selected collections also were examined from Some years ago, I published a partial revision several other herbaria: BM, DUIS, GRO, H, and of the genus Pseudosymblepharis Broth. in Asia PC. Material was also identified from the (Sollman, 2000). This genus is now treated as a following private herbaria: G. Een, N.G. synonym of Chionoloma Dixon (Sollman, 2001). Hodgetts, G. and S. Miehe, F. Müller, B.J. During identification work on African O’Shea, R.D. Porley, K. Wesche, M. Wigginton, material, I came across essentially the same B.O. van Zanten. variation patterns as described for the Asian The African taxa described in the genera material (Sollman, 2000), and so that discussion Oxystegus (Limpr.) Hilp., Tortella (Lindb.) of variable characters, description, habitat and Limpr., Trichostomum Bruch and also some of others is not repeated here. This paper should be Barbula Hedw., were also checked as it was read in connection with the Pseudosymblepharis possible that at least some of them could belong revision (Sollman, 2000). to Chionoloma. All author citations in botanical names The same low percentage (ca 7%) of follow Brummitt and Powell (1992). fruiting plants were seen in the African material (compare Sollman, 2000: 130). -
Cat Alog of Amazonian Mosses
J. Hattori Bot. Lab. No. 85: 191- 238 (Nov. 1998) CATALOG OF AMAZONIAN MOSSES STEVEN P. CHURCHILL 1 ABSTRACT. Moss diversity for the Amazon region is estimated at 39 families, 101 genera, and 311 species. A primarily specimen-based catalog provides documentation for the five countries (Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador and Peru) that constitute the Amazon region as defined here. Amazonia represents the largest floristic region in the Neotropics, yet with regard to the moss flora represented there, it is less diverse than all other neotropical regions with the possible exceptions of the Pianalto of Brazil and the smaller sized Guayana Highlands. INTRODUCTION The Amazon region is the single largest phytogeographical unit recognized in the Neotropics. The dimensions of the Amazon Basin, equated in size to the contiguous United States, is no less difficult to comprehend than is the biological diversity found there. Our knowledge of Amazonian diversity is, however, limited to a few select groups of organisms such as birds and mammals. Flowering plant diversity is acknowledged to be exceptionally high, Brazilian Amazonia alone is estimated at 18,000 species (Davis et al., 1997). The objective of this present effort is to document moss diversity at the regional level for Amazonia (Fig. I). It is presumed that most of the diversity to be found in Amazonia with regard to mosses is now known. Some of the species recognized in this catalog will likely prove to be synonyms, conversely it is probable that an equal number of species will be newly recorded for the region in the future, particularly at its periphery. -
Vegetative Propagules
Glime, J. M. 2017. Adaptive Strategies: Vegetative Propagules. Chapt. 4-10. In: Glime, J. M. Bryophyte Ecology. Volume 1. 4-10-1 Physiological Ecology. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Last updated 24 April 2021 and available at <http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology/>. CHAPTER 4-10 ADAPTIVE STRATEGIES: VEGETATIVE PROPAGULES TABLE OF CONTENTS Vegetative Reproduction ................................................................................................................................... 4-10-2 Adaptations ....................................................................................................................................................... 4-10-8 Fragmentation ................................................................................................................................................... 4-10-8 Leaves and Stems ..................................................................................................................................... 4-10-10 Regenerants .............................................................................................................................................. 4-10-14 Protonemata ............................................................................................................................................. 4-10-14 Perianths .................................................................................................................................................. -
Alabama Inventory List
Alabama Inventory List The Rare, Threatened, & Endangered Plants & Animals of Alabama Alabama Natural August 2015 Heritage Program® TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 1 CHANGES FROM ALNHP TRACKING LIST OF OCTOBER 2012 ............................................... 3 DEFINITION OF HERITAGE RANKS ................................................................................................ 6 DEFINITIONS OF FEDERAL & STATE LISTED SPECIES STATUS ........................................... 8 VERTEBRATES ...................................................................................................................................... 10 Birds....................................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Mammals ............................................................................................................................................................................... 15 Reptiles .................................................................................................................................................................................. 18 Lizards, Snakes, and Amphisbaenas .................................................................................................................................. 18 Turtles and Tortoises ........................................................................................................................................................ -
Volume 1, Chapter 4-2: Adaptive Strategies: Phenology, It's All in the Timing
Glime, J. M. 2017. Adaptive Strategies: Phenology, It's All in the Timing. Chapt. 4-2. In: Glime, J. M. Bryophyte Ecology. Volume 1. 4-2-1 Physiological Ecology. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Last updated 3 June 2020 and available at <http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology/>. CHAPTER 4-2 ADAPTIVE STRATEGIES: PHENOLOGY, IT'S ALL IN THE TIMING TABLE OF CONTENTS Timing the Stages – Environmental Cues ...................................................................................................... 4-2-2 Patterns ........................................................................................................................................................ 4-2-2 Growth ......................................................................................................................................................... 4-2-3 Asexual Reproduction .................................................................................................................................. 4-2-7 Gametangia .................................................................................................................................................. 4-2-8 Protandry and Protogyny...................................................................................................................... 4-2-10 Sporophyte Maturation ............................................................................................................................... 4-2-11 Energy -
Didymodon Umbrosus T(Müll.Hal.) R.H.Zander and Tortula Brevissima Schiffn
2 Egypt. J. Bot. Vol. 59, No. 1, pp. 15 - 28 (2019) Three New Pottiaceae Records to the Bryoflora of Libya Mai Ahmed Taha Botany Department, Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt. HREE TAXA of Pottiaceae; Crossidium laevipilum Thér. & Trab., Didymodon umbrosus T(Müll.Hal.) R.H.Zander and Tortula brevissima Schiffn. are new records to the moss flora of Libya bringing the number of mosses known from this country to 105 taxa. Furthermore, the present work adds 14 moss taxa to Gharyan area which raises the moss known from it to 27 taxa. Descriptions, illustrations, floristic and distribution remarks are provided for the three new records to Libya. Keywords: Pottiaceae, Bryoflora, Libya, Gharyan, New records. Introduction the Mediterranean area published by Ros et al. (2013) showed that a total of 91 taxa were known Libya is located in the north of Africa on the from Libya. Records continued and the number Mediterranean coast, encompasses a geographical of mosses known from Libya reached 102 taxa area estimated at about 1, 750, 000km2, between in the latest list published by El-Saadawi et al. 19–34° N and 9–26°E (Fig. 1). Libya is an area (2017). The 102 taxa belong to 45 genera, in 16 of particular interest as it includes areas which families and 8 orders all under class Bryopsida. experience both Mediterranean and North The 16 families (arranged in a descending order African climates (semi-arid and arid climates) according to the number of taxa each includes) (Ageena et al., 2014); roughly 90.5% of the area are: Pottiaceae 43 taxa, Brachytheciaceae 18, is hyper-arid, 7.5% is arid, 1.5% semi-arid, and Bryaceae 11, Fissidentaceae and Funariaceae 0.5% is classified as sub-humid (Ben-Mahmoud, each 5 taxa, Orthotrichaceae 4, Grimmiaceae 1993); with the sub-humid region located in 3, Dicranaceae, Ditrichaceae, Encalyptaceae, northeast Libya near the cities of Shahhat and and Mniaceae each 2 taxa, Amblystegiaceae, Al-Bayda (Ageena et al., 2014). -
Complete Mitochondrial Genome Sequence of the &Ldquo
Complete mitochondrial genome sequence of the “copper moss” Mielichhoferia elongata reveals independent nad7 gene functionality loss Denis V. Goryunov1, Svetlana V. Goryunova2, Oxana I. Kuznetsova3, Maria D. Logacheva1, Irina A. Milyutina1, Alina V. Fedorova1, Michael S. Ignatov3 and Aleksey V. Troitsky1 1 Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia 2 Institute of General Genetics Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia 3 Tsitsin Main Botanical Garden Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia ABSTRACT The mitochondrial genome of moss Mielichhoferia elongata has been sequenced and assembled with Spades genome assembler. It consists of 100,342 base pairs and has practically the same gene set and order as in other known bryophyte chondriomes. The genome contains 66 genes including three rRNAs, 24 tRNAs, and 40 conserved mitochondrial proteins genes. Unlike the majority of previously sequenced bryophyte mitogenomes, it lacks the functional nad7 gene. The phylogenetic reconstruction and scrutiny analysis of the primary structure of nad7 gene carried out in this study suggest its independent pseudogenization in different bryophyte lineages. Evaluation of the microsatellite (simple sequence repeat) content of the M. elongata mitochondrial genome indicates that it could be used as a tool in further studies as a phylogenetic marker. The strongly supported phylogenetic tree presented here, derived from 33 protein coding sequences of Submitted 4 September 2017 40 bryophyte species, is consistent with other reconstructions based on a number 19 January 2018 Accepted of different data sets. Published 2 February 2018 Corresponding authors Denis V. Goryunov, Subjects Biodiversity, Evolutionary Studies, Genomics, Plant Science, Taxonomy [email protected] Keywords Mitochondrial genome, Bryophyta, Phylogenetic tree, “Copper moss” Mielichhoferia Aleksey V. -
2447 Introductions V3.Indd
BRYOATT Attributes of British and Irish Mosses, Liverworts and Hornworts With Information on Native Status, Size, Life Form, Life History, Geography and Habitat M O Hill, C D Preston, S D S Bosanquet & D B Roy NERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology and Countryside Council for Wales 2007 © NERC Copyright 2007 Designed by Paul Westley, Norwich Printed by The Saxon Print Group, Norwich ISBN 978-1-85531-236-4 The Centre of Ecology and Hydrology (CEH) is one of the Centres and Surveys of the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC). Established in 1994, CEH is a multi-disciplinary environmental research organisation. The Biological Records Centre (BRC) is operated by CEH, and currently based at CEH Monks Wood. BRC is jointly funded by CEH and the Joint Nature Conservation Committee (www.jncc/gov.uk), the latter acting on behalf of the statutory conservation agencies in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. CEH and JNCC support BRC as an important component of the National Biodiversity Network. BRC seeks to help naturalists and research biologists to co-ordinate their efforts in studying the occurrence of plants and animals in Britain and Ireland, and to make the results of these studies available to others. For further information, visit www.ceh.ac.uk Cover photograph: Bryophyte-dominated vegetation by a late-lying snow patch at Garbh Uisge Beag, Ben Macdui, July 2007 (courtesy of Gordon Rothero). Published by Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Monks Wood, Abbots Ripton, Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire, PE28 2LS. Copies can be ordered by writing to the above address until Spring 2008; thereafter consult www.ceh.ac.uk Contents Introduction . -
Lumping Or Splitting? the Case of Racomitrium (Bryophytina: Grimmiaceae)
TAXON 62 (6) • December 2013: 1117–1132 Larraín & al. • Lumping or splitting in Racomitrium Lumping or splitting? The case of Racomitrium (Bryophytina: Grimmiaceae) Juan Larraín,1,2,7 Dietmar Quandt,2 Michael Stech3,4 & Jesús Muñoz5,6 1 Departamento de Botánica, Universidad de Concepción, Casilla 160-C, Concepción, Chile 2 Nees-Institut für Biodiversität der Pflanzen, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, Meckenheimer Allee 170, 53115 Bonn, Germany 3 Naturalis Biodiversity Center, P.O. Box 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands 4 Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands 5 Real Jardín Botánico (RJB-CSIC), Plaza de Murillo 2, 28014 Madrid, Spain 6 Centro de Investigación de la Biodiversidad y Cambio Climático, Universidad Tecnológica Indoamérica, Machala y Sabanilla, Quito, Ecuador 7 Current address: Science & Education, The Field Museum, 1400 South Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A. Author for correspondence: Juan Larraín, [email protected] Abstract The genus Racomitrium (Grimmiaceae: Racomitrioideae) was recently segregated into four genera―Racomitrium, Niphotrichum, Codriophorus, and Bucklandiella―following an infrageneric division originally proposed more than 100 years ago based on morphological traits such as the presence and shape of laminal cell papillae and hyaline leaf hairpoints, and dif- ferences in peristome teeth morphology and costa structure. Here we present a molecular phylogeny of Racomitrium s.l. based on nuclear ITS and plastid rps4-trnL and trnK/matK-psbA sequences, to test the monophyly of these four morphological enti- ties. Our results solely support the monophyly of Racomitrium s.str., which includes only R. geronticum, R. lanuginosum, and R. pruinosum, while the members of the other segregate genera are distributed in different clades, rendering them polyphyletic (Bucklandiella, Codriophorus) or paraphyletic (Niphotrichum).