CHESS EVOLUTION Arkadij Naiditsch
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
6Th London Chess Classic (6-14 December 2014)
6TH LONDON CHESS CLASSIC (6-14 DECEMBER 2014) CLASSIC ROUND 4: 14 DECEMBER 2014 YOU’VE JUST BEEN SPACEBARRED With one round to go (starting at 2pm on Sunday), the Classic is nicely poised with five of the six players still able to finish first. Round four featured just the one decisive result, with Hikaru Nakamura beating Mickey Adams, which makes the scores as follows: Kramnik and Giri 6, Nakamura 5, Anand and Adams 4, Caruana 3. One of the great things about an international chess tournament is the exchange of ideas between people from different countries and cultures. From the beginning, the London Chess Classic has placed a great deal of importance on invitees putting in as positive a performance in the commentary room as they do at the board. Top chessplayers are highly intelligent people and have quickly realised that their livelihood depends as much on their ability to communicate as to play good moves. Consequently we now have a young generation of players with the confidence to innovate off the board linguistically as well as on it. Not just those who have English as their first language, either. It’s gratifying for us native Brits to have our language adopted worldwide as the first language of chess, but perhaps a bit scary too. As with our other notable export, football, where we have had to learn to endure other countries playing it a lot better than we do, we now have to live with people from non-English speaking countries being more articulate and creative in English than we are. -
Chess Mag - 21 6 10 18/09/2020 14:01 Page 3
01-01 Cover - October 2020_Layout 1 18/09/2020 14:00 Page 1 03-03 Contents_Chess mag - 21_6_10 18/09/2020 14:01 Page 3 Chess Contents Founding Editor: B.H. Wood, OBE. M.Sc † Executive Editor: Malcolm Pein Editorial....................................................................................................................4 Editors: Richard Palliser, Matt Read Malcolm Pein on the latest developments in the game Associate Editor: John Saunders Subscriptions Manager: Paul Harrington 60 Seconds with...Peter Wells.......................................................................7 Twitter: @CHESS_Magazine The acclaimed author, coach and GM still very much likes to play Twitter: @TelegraphChess - Malcolm Pein Website: www.chess.co.uk Online Drama .........................................................................................................8 Danny Gormally presents some highlights of the vast Online Olympiad Subscription Rates: United Kingdom Carlsen Prevails - Just ....................................................................................14 1 year (12 issues) £49.95 Nakamura pushed Magnus all the way in the final of his own Tour 2 year (24 issues) £89.95 Find the Winning Moves.................................................................................18 3 year (36 issues) £125 Can you do as well as the acclaimed field in the Legends of Chess? Europe 1 year (12 issues) £60 Opening Surprises ............................................................................................22 2 year (24 issues) £112.50 -
The Berlin Wall in NATO Chess Jan Cheung, 1 March 2017
The Berlin Wall in NATO Chess Jan Cheung, 1 March 2017 Last year one of the games had its premiere. For the first time in the history of NATO Chess, a Berlin Defence made its debut. So far I had never seen this middle game at amateur level! The Berlin Defee, ikaed The Beli Wall, is a stategi iddle gae ithout uees, diffiult to pla from both white and black. It is mostly played at 2600+ grandmaster level when black is happy with a draw. Amateurs do not play this defence because in open tournaments, black should create chances to win the game. Even the top 12 of women chess do not play this defence. A reason may be that the Berlin Defence requires sophisticated play from both sides. A minor reason for black not to play the Berlin Defence is that in one side variation, white can force a draw by repetition of moves. Hundreds of games between grandmasters have been played in this manner, to get around the Sofia rule. To avoid spoiling my chess creativity, I will not show you this variation. In this article I want to show you some ideas of the Berlin Defence, with the game played in the 3rd round of the 2016 NATO Chess Championship. You do not have to know much theory about the Berlin Defence to understand the middle game concepts. Pietruszewski, Marcin (2163) – Nielsen, Morten Majlund (2004) C67 NATO-ch 27th Shrivenham (3.8) 23.08.2016 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5 We start with the Ruy Lopez. -
Round 1: 4 December 2015
7TH LONDON CHESS CLASSIC (4-13 DECEMBER 2015) CLASSIC ROUND 1: 4 DECEMBER 2015 John Saunders reports: The seventh London Chess Classic – bigger and even stronger than its six predecessors – got under way on Friday 4 December 2015 with some tense chess, and just the one decisive result, as Anish Giri of the Netherlands recovered from a dubious position to defeat Veselin Topalov and snatch an early lead. Figure 1 A semi-circle of super-GMs It is hard to believe that the Classic has only been around for six years as it is now established as the finale of the year’s elite chess tournament circuit. And it’s as much about beginnings as ends: in its first incarnation in 2009, Magnus Carlsen exploited the opportunity to move to the top of the rating list for the first time. He clearly likes playing in London as he has won three of the four London Classics in which he has competed, as well as winning the London Candidates in 2013 on his way to wresting the world championship from Vishy Anand. It’s great to have him back in 2015. You’ll be aware that the format of the London Classic rarely stays the same from one year to the next. We like to ring the changes almost as often as Big Ben chimes. So this year, as an innovation, we’re only awarding one point for a win and a mere half-point for a draw. What’s that you say? That’s how you score tournaments in your own countries? OK, fair enough, so it’s not really an innovation, then. -
Round 5: 8 December 2015
7TH LONDON CHESS CLASSIC (4-13 DECEMBER 2015) CLASSIC ROUND 5: 8 DECEMBER 2015 John Saunders reports: As usual we started with some children making moves for the grandmasters. This time the children in question had travelled all the way from Gloucestershire. That’s around 200 kilometres due west of London for those readers unfamiliar with our green and pleasant land, and our adherence to Imperial units of measurement. They brought with them some innovative opening ideas. The little boy from Slimbridge Primary School deputed to make Levon Aronian’s move against Magnus Carlsen unfurled 1.Nh3!? which was extremely welcome with us photographers as it made the players smile for the camera. The clash of two of the leaders, Vachier-Lagrave and Giri, was bloodless and the first game to finish, around two hours into the round. It was a Berlin Defence and drawn in 33 moves. The main point of interest was the move 19...Nd4, which must have been computer analysis. It was a prepared improvement on the game Adams-Kramnik, played – no prizes for guessing where – yes, at the Classic last year. Thereafter the only piquant point was the presence of passed pawns on the same file (as if they had somehow overtaken one other). However, the resultant position was lifeless and a repetition duly followed. The Athenian oracle was typically withering: "I have gone on strike: I refuse to commentate on [MVL v Giri] as a point of principle." A colleague in the press room thought that the players' priority might have been watching the evenings' Champions League matches. -
London Chess Classic Day 3 Round-Up
6th December 2015 LONDON CHESS CLASSIC DAY 3 ROUND-UP After yesterday’s five draws, it looked like there could be up to four decisive results in today’s 3rd round, but many missed opportunities meant Maxime Vachier-Lagrave was the only player to bring home the full point, thus joining Anish Giri in the lead with 2/3. World Champion Magnus Carlsen facing his predecessor Vishy Anand In the most highly anticipated clash of the day, Carlsen chose to meet Anand’s Ruy Lopez with the Berlin Defence, an opening that famously played a huge part in both their World Championship matches. Anand came out of the opening with a favourable position, but a few inaccuracies before the time control left Carlsen in the driving seat. However, the World Champion failed to convert his clear advantage and the players eventually agreed a draw on move 57. Carlsen was clearly displeased after the game, stating: ‘It was a bit embarrassing for both of us’. Another player who came very close to tasting victory was Alexander Grischuk. The Russian virtuoso spent 1 hour and 3 minutes(!) on 20.f4, but subsequently reached an almost winning position. Having run very short of time though, he missed the necessary precision to convert his advantage and a draw was agreed – meaning Anish Giri remains unbeaten in the Grand Chess Tour. Caruana will also be disappointed tonight, as he failed to convert a position that seemed to be technically winning in the US derby against Nakamura. Adams meanwhile scored his third draw - against Aronian - despite having been a tiny bit worse out of the opening. -
Chess.Org E F G H
See our 2017 USCF Sales Spring Buying Guide in the center of this issue! J’adoube! Fabiano Caruana re-adjusts to life in the U.S. as he begins his Championship defense April 2017 | USChess.org e f g h 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 e f g h a b c d e f g h 8 7 7 6 5 5 4 4 a b c d e f g h 3 8 2 7 7 1 1 6 5 5 a b c d e f g h 4 4 a b c d e f g h 3 8 7 2 6 1 1 5 a b c e f g h 4 3 2 1 a c d e f g h World’s biggest open tournament! 45th Annual WORLD OPEN 9 rounds at luxurious Philadelphia Downtown Marriott June 29-July 4, June 30-July 4, July 1-4 or 2-4 - $225,000 guaranteed prize fund GM & IM norms possible, mixed doubles prizes, GM lectures & analysis! A HISTORIC SITE SPECIAL FEATURES! 4) Provisional (under 26 games) prize The World Open returns to the 1) Schedule options. 5-day is most limits in U1200 to U2000. Marriott Downtown, near many historic popular; 6-day leisurely, 4-day and 3-day 5) Unrated not allowed in U900 to landmarks including Independence Hall, save time & money. Open is 5-day only. U1800; prize limited in U2000 & U2200. Franklin Institute, Philadelphia Museum of 2) Open Section includes large class 6) Mixed Doubles: $3000-1500-700- Art, the Liberty Bell, and restaurants, prizes: $5000-2500-1500 to each of FIDE 500-300 for male/female teams. -
European Defence: How to Engage the UK After Brexit?
European defence: how to engage the UK after Brexit? Anne Bakker Clingendael Report Margriet Drent Dick Zandee European defence: how to engage the UK after Brexit? Anne Bakker Margriet Drent Dick Zandee Clingendael report July 2017 This Report has been commissioned by the Netherlands Ministries of Foreign Affairs and Defence within the PROGRESS framework agreement, lot 4, 2017. Responsibility for the contents and for the opinions expressed rests solely with the authors; publication does not constitute an endorsement by the Netherlands Ministries of Foreign Affairs and Defence. July 2017 © Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’. Cover photo: Theresa May and Federica Mogherini © European External Action Service (EEAS) Unauthorised use of any materials violates copyright, trademark and / or other laws. Should a user download material from the website or any other source related to the Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’, or the Clingendael Institute, for personal or non-commercial use, the user must retain all copyright, trademark or other similar notices contained in the original material or on any copies of this material. Material on the website of the Clingendael Institute may be reproduced or publicly displayed, distributed or used for any public and non-commercial purposes, but only by mentioning the Clingendael Institute as its source. Permission is required to use the logo of the Clingendael Institute. This can be obtained by contacting the Communication desk of the Clingendael Institute ([email protected]). The following web link activities are prohibited by the Clingendael Institute and may present trademark and copyright infringement issues: links that involve unauthorised use of our logo, framing, inline links, or metatags, as well as hyperlinks or a form of link disguising the URL. -
Arkadij Naiditsch: “Why the German A-Team Will Not Participate in the Olympiad”
Inhalt: Offener Brief Naiditsch (englisch) 111 Komentare Interview Fridman (dtsch.) von Johannes Fischer Stellungnahme Arkadij Naiditsch: “Why the German A-team will not participate in the Olympiad” 28 July 2010, 9.00 CET | Last modified: 9:41 | By Editors | Filed under: Reports | Tags: Open letter Due to financial problems and organizational failure by the German Chess Federation, the four German top players won’t play at the upcoming Olympiad in Khanty-Mansiysk. This is what Arkadij Naiditsch tries to make clear in an angry open letter which he sent to ChessVibes. The German top grandmaster doesn’t mince words. Open letter by GM Arkadij Naiditsch Why the German A-team will not participate in the 2010 Olympiad Cc: Prof. Dr. Von Weizsäcker This letter is not addressed to anybody directly. As a player of the German National team I would like to make some things clear about my hard working Federation and its President, Prof. Dr. Von Weizsäcker. Let’s start with the fact that nobody from the German A-team is going to participate in the Chess Olympiad this year. These players are Georg Meier, Jan Gustafsson, Daniel Fridman and me, Arkadij Naiditsch. Why? The easy answer is that the biggest chess federation in Europe, about 100,000 active members, couldn’t manage to find money to pay the players. So, the next question is “how could this happen”? This question is easy to answer as well: nobody in the federation has been doing anything for at least five years. The German Chess Federation has no sponsors at the moment, so the money is only coming from their members. -
Dortmunder Sparkassen Chess Meeting 2007, Runde 1
DORTMUNDER SPARKASSEN CHESS - MEETING 23. JUNI BIS 1. JULI 2007 --------------------------- Runde 1 -------------------------- 23.06.07 Dortmunder Sparkassen Chess-Meeting 2007 eröffnet Mamedjarow mit Auftakt-Sieg gegen Naiditsch (Dortmund, 23. Juni). Das Dortmunder Sparkassen Chess-Meeting 2007 ist eröffnet. Der Startschuss für die 35. Internationalen Dortmunder Schachtage fiel heute Nachmittag im Schauspielhaus vor voll besetzten Rängen. Jörg Busatta, Vorstandsmitglied des Titelsponsors Sparkasse Dortmund, Birgit Jörder, Bürgermeisterin der Stadt Dortmund sowie Prof. Dr. Robert von Weizsäcker, neuer Präsident des Deutschen Schachbundes, nahmen den Eröffnungszug in der Spitzenpartie zwischen Wladimir Kramnik und Viswanathan Anand vor. Bis 1. Juli werden auf der Bühne des Schauspielhauses acht Großmeister um den Titel kämpfen. Mit einer Wertigkeit der Kategorie 20 ist das Sparkassen Chess- Meeting 2007 in diesem Jahr das zweitstärkste klassische Turnier weltweit. Einen glänzenden Turnierstart erwischte Shakhriyar Mamedjarow. Bei seinem ersten Auftritt in Dortmund konnte der 22-Jährige aus Aserbaidschan gleich seinen ersten Sieg verbuchen. In der längsten Partie des Tages musste sich Lokalmatador Arkadij Naiditsch dem Weltranglisten-Sechsten nach knapp viereinhalb Stunden geschlagen geben. Die Spitzenbegegnung zwischen Weltmeister Wladimir Kramnik (Russland) und Viswanathan Anand (Indien) endete nach 35 Zügen mit einem Remis. In einem Damengambit besaß Kramnik mit den weißen Steinen im Partieverlauf leichte Stellungsvorteile, die jedoch nicht zum Sieg reichten. Jewgeni Alexejew (Russland), der sich durch seinen Sieg beim Aeroflot Open in Moskau für Dortmund qualifizierte, holte sich mit den schwarzen Steinen gegen WM-Teilnehmer Boris Gelfand (Israel) den ersten halben Punkt. Die erste Partie des Tages war nach knapp drei Stunden beendet: Der 16- jährige Dortmund-Debütant Magnus Carlsen (Norwegen) und Peter Leko (Ungarn), zweimaliger Sieger des Sparkassen Chess-Meetings, trennten sich in einer Spanischen Partie nach 29 Zügen unentschieden. -
Openings.Pdf
OPEN GAMES They start: 1. e2-e4 e7-e5 XABCDEFGH 8rsnlwqkvlntr( 7zppzpp+pzpp' 6-+-+-+-+& 5+-+-zp-+-% 4-+-+P+-+$ 3+-+-+-+-# 2PzPPzP-zPPzP" 1tRNvLQmKLsNR! Xabcdefgh WHITE SAYS: You're expecting the Ruy Lopez? Tough. I'm going to play my favourite opening and see what you know about it. It could be anything from a wild gambit to a quiet line. You'll soon find out. BLACK SAYS: These openings really aren't so scary. I'm well prepared: I can reach at least an equal position whichever one you choose. Go ahead and do your worst. XABCDEFGH 8rsnlwqkvlntr( 7zppzpp+pzpp' 6-+-+-+-+& 5+-+-zp-+-% 4-+-+P+-+$ 3+-+-+-+-# 2PzPPzP-zPPzP" 1tRNvLQmKLsNR! Xabcdefgh Most of these openings fall into one of three categories: 1. White plays for a central break with d4 (Scotch Game, Ponziani, most lines of Giuoco Piano and Two Knights). 2. White plays for a central break with f4 (King's Gambit, most lines of the Vienna and Bishop's Opening). 3. White plays quietly with d3 (Giuoco Pianissimo, Spanish Four Knights). We also look at some other defences for Black after 2. Ng1-f3, from safe defensive systems to sharp counter- gambits. What should Black do next? Ideas for White: Adults will expect the Ruy Lopez while juniors are more used to this sort of opening. So it's a good idea to play the Ruy Lopez against juniors, and, for example, the Giuoco Piano against adults. Most of these openings lead to open positions. Rapid, effective development and King safety are the most important factors. Don't play the Ng5 line against good opponents unless you really know what you're doing. -
The First FIDE Man-Machine World Chess Championship
The First FIDE Man-Machine World Chess Championship Jonathan Schaeffer Department of Computing Science University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta Canada T6G 2E8 [email protected] In 1989, 1996 and 1997, world chess champion Garry Kasparov battled with the strongest computer chess program in the world – Deep Blue and its predecessor Deep Thought. In 1989, man easily defeated machine. In 1996, Kasparov also won, but this time with difficulty, including losing a game to the computer. In 1997, Deep Blue stunned the world by narrowly winning the match. Was Deep Blue the best chess player in the world? Or was the result a fluke? We had no answer, as IBM immediately retired Deep Blue after the match. A frustrated Kasparov wanted another chance to play the computer, but it never happened. I am a professor in computer science, and specifically do research in the area of artificial intelligence – making computers appear to do intelligent things. Most of my research has used games to demonstrate my ideas. In the 1980’s it was with my chess program Phoenix. In the early 1990’s it was with the checkers program Chinook. These days it is with our poker program, Poki. As a scientist, I was dissatisfied with the 1997 result. There was one short chess match which suggested that machine was better than man at chess. But science is all about producing reproducible results. More data was needed before one could objectively decide whether computer chess programs really were as good as (or better) than the best human chess player in the world.