DOCSLIB.ORG

Evolution in 3D

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evolution in 3D Evolution in 3D Lisa Jones A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Faculty of Medical Sciences Newcastle University November 2016 i Abstract This thesis explores the mechanisms underlying motion vision in the praying mantis (Sphodromantis lineola) and how this visual predator perceives camouflaged prey. By recording the mantis optomotor response to wide-field motion I was able to define the mantis Dmax, the point where a pattern is displaced by such a distance that coherent motion is no longer perceived. This allowed me to investigate the spatial characteristics of the insect wide field motion processing pathway. The insect Dmax was found to be very similar to that observed in humans which suggests similar underlying motion processing mechanisms; whereby low spatial frequency local motion is being pooled over a larger visual area compared to higher spatial frequency motion. By recording the mantis tracking response to computer generated targets, I was able to investigate whether there are any benefits of background matching when prey are moving and whether pattern influences the predatory response of the mantis towards prey. I found that only prey with large pattern elements benefit from background matching during movement; and above all prey which remain un- patterned but match the mean luminance of the background receive the greatest survival advantage. Additionally, I examined the effects of background motion on the tracking response of the mantis towards moving prey. By using a computer generated target as prey, I investigated the benefits associated with matching background motion as a protective strategy to reduce the risk of detection by predators. I found the mantis was able to successfully track a moving target in the presence of background motion. ii My results suggests that although there are no overall benefits for prey to match background motion, it is costly to move out of phase with the background motion. Finally, I examined the contrast sensitivity of the mantis wide-field and small target motion detection pathways. Using the mantis tracking response to small targets and the optomotor response to wide-field motion; I measured the distinct temporal and spatial signatures of each pathway. I found the mantis wide-field and small target movement detecting pathways are each tuned to a different set of spatial and temporal frequencies. The wide-field motion detecting pathway has a high sensitivity to a broad range of spatio-temporal frequencies making it sensitive to a broad range of velocities; whereas the small-target motion-detection pathway has a high sensitivity to a narrow set of spatio-temporal combinations with optimal sensitivity to targets with a low spatial frequency. iii Acknowledgements Firstly, I would like to thank my committed and continuously supportive supervisors Claire Rind, Candy Rowe and Jenny Read. Thank you for your encouragement, patience and immense knowledge. I have learned so much from you all over the past 4 years and am eternally grateful. I would like to thank Ghaith Tarawheh for producing the visual stimuli for all of my experiments and fitting the Dmax psychometric functions. Thank you for always being so patient and optimistic even when I make last minute changes to your code. Without your help this work would not have been possible. To my husband, thank you for always believing in me and reminding me of the important things in life. Without your support, I wouldn’t have the courage to chase my dreams. Finally thank you to my family of pets Pasha, Bebe, Lentil, Chickpea and Clarkson. Your furry cuddles will always get me through difficult times and bring me back down to earth. iv Table of Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................................................ ii Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................. iv Abbreviation .............................................................................................................................. ix Chapter 1: General Introduction ......................................................................................... 1 1.1 The Praying Mantis ................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 The Compound Eye................................................................................................................. 1 1.2.1 Structure .......................................................................................................................... 2 1.2.2 Resolution and sensitivity ................................................................................................ 3 1.3 Insect Motion Vision ............................................................................................................... 4 1.3.1 Elementary motion detector ........................................................................................... 5 1.3.2 Insect motion detecting pathway .................................................................................... 6 1.3.3 Direction selectivity ......................................................................................................... 7 1.3.4 EMD tuning ...................................................................................................................... 8 1.4 Apparent Motion .................................................................................................................... 9 1.4.1 Dmax .............................................................................................................................. 11 1.5 Small Target Detection ......................................................................................................... 11 1.5.1 Small target detecting neurons ..................................................................................... 12 1.6 Camouflage ........................................................................................................................... 13 1.6.1 Crypsis and motion ........................................................................................................ 14 1.6.2 Factors affecting crypsis ................................................................................................ 15 1.7 The praying mantis as a visual predator ............................................................................... 16 1.8 Target Identification ............................................................................................................. 17 1.9 Mantis prey preference ........................................................................................................ 18 1.10 Project outline .................................................................................................................... 19 Chapter 2: General methods ............................................................................................... 21 2.1 Subjects ................................................................................................................................ 21 2.2 Experimental set-up ............................................................................................................. 21 2.2.3 Equipment ..................................................................................................................... 22 2.2.4 Viewing distance ............................................................................................................ 23 2.3 Experimental procedure ....................................................................................................... 24 v 2.4 Behaviour ............................................................................................................................. 25 2.4.1 Optomotor response ..................................................................................................... 25 2.4.2 Tracking response ......................................................................................................... 25 2.4.3 Other behaviours .......................................................................................................... 26 Chapter 3: Apparent-motion perception by the Praying Mantis (Sphodromantis lineola) ....................................................................................................................................... 27 3.1 Abstract ................................................................................................................................ 27 3.2 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 29 3.3 Methods ............................................................................................................................... 32 3.4 Data Analysis ........................................................................................................................ 35 3.4.1 Calculating Dmax ........................................................................................................... 35 3.5 Results .................................................................................................................................. 38 3.6 Discussion ............................................................................................................................. 42 Chapter 4: Background matching in moving targets
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Genus Metallyticus Reviewed (Insecta: Mantodea)
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228623877 The genus Metallyticus reviewed (Insecta: Mantodea) Article · September 2008 CITATIONS READS 11 353 1 author: Frank Wieland Pfalzmuseum für Naturkunde - POLLICHIA-… 33 PUBLICATIONS 113 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE All in-text references underlined in blue are linked to publications on ResearchGate, Available from: Frank Wieland letting you access and read them immediately. Retrieved on: 24 October 2016 Species, Phylogeny and Evolution 1, 3 (30.9.2008): 147-170. The genus Metallyticus reviewed (Insecta: Mantodea) Frank Wieland Johann-Friedrich-Blumenbach-Institut für Zoologie & Anthropologie und Zoologisches Museum der Georg-August-Universität, Abteilung für Morphologie, Systematik und Evolutionsbiologie, Berliner Str. 28, 37073 Göttingen, Germany [[email protected]] Abstract Metallyticus Westwood, 1835 (Insecta: Dictyoptera: Mantodea) is one of the most fascinating praying mantids but little is known of its biology. Several morphological traits are plesiomorphic, such as the short prothorax, characters of the wing venation and possibly also the lack of discoidal spines on the fore femora. On the other hand, Metallyticus has autapomor- phies which are unique among extant Mantodea, such as the iridescent bluish-green body coloration and the enlargement of the first posteroventral spine of the fore femora. The present publication reviews our knowledge of Metallyticus thus providing a basis for further research. Data on 115 Metallyticus specimens are gathered and interpreted. The Latin original descriptions of the five Metallyticus species known to date, as well as additional descriptions and a key to species level that were originally published by Giglio-Tos (1927) in French, are translated into English.
    [Show full text]
  • Arthropod Grasping and Manipulation: a Literature Review
    Arthropod Grasping and Manipulation A Literature Review Aaron M. Dollar Harvard BioRobotics Laboratory Technical Report Department of Engineering and Applied Sciences Harvard University April 5, 2001 www.biorobotics.harvard.edu Introduction The purpose of this review is to report on the existing literature on the subject of arthropod grasping and manipulation. In order to gain a proper understanding of the state of the knowledge in this rather broad topic, it is necessary and appropriate to take a step backwards and become familiar with the basics of entomology and arthropod physiology. Once these principles have been understood it will then be possible to proceed towards the more specific literature that has been published in the field. The structure of the review follows this strategy. General background information will be presented first, followed by successively more specific topics, and ending with a review of the refereed journal articles related to arthropod grasping and manipulation. Background The phylum Arthropoda is the largest of the phyla, and includes all animals that have an exoskeleton, a segmented body in series, and six or more jointed legs. There are nine classes within the phylum, five of which the average human is relatively familiar with – insects, arachnids, crustaceans, centipedes, and millipedes. Of all known species of animals on the planet, 82% are arthropods (c. 980,000 species)! And this number just reflects the known species. Estimates put the number of arthropod species remaining to be discovered and named at around 9-30 million, or 10-30 times more than are currently known. And this is just the number of species; the population of each is another matter altogether.
    [Show full text]
  • Portia Perceptions: the Umwelt of an Araneophagic Jumping Spider
    Portia Perceptions: The Umwelt of an Araneophagic Jumping 1 Spider Duane P. Harland and Robert R. Jackson The Personality of Portia Spiders are traditionally portrayed as simple, instinct-driven animals (Savory, 1928; Drees, 1952; Bristowe, 1958). Small brain size is perhaps the most compelling reason for expecting so little flexibility from our eight-legged neighbors. Fitting comfortably on the head of a pin, a spider brain seems to vanish into insignificance. Common sense tells us that compared with large-brained mammals, spiders have so little to work with that they must be restricted to a circumscribed set of rigid behaviors, flexibility being a luxury afforded only to those with much larger central nervous systems. In this chapter we review recent findings on an unusual group of spiders that seem to be arachnid enigmas. In a number of ways the behavior of the araneophagic jumping spiders is more comparable to that of birds and mammals than conventional wisdom would lead us to expect of an arthropod. The term araneophagic refers to these spiders’ preference for other spiders as prey, and jumping spider is the common English name for members of the family Saltici- dae. Although both their common and the scientific Latin names acknowledge their jumping behavior, it is really their unique, complex eyes that set this family of spiders apart from all others. Among spiders (many of which have very poor vision), salticids have eyes that are by far the most specialized for resolving fine spatial detail. We focus here on the most extensively studied genus, Portia. Before we discuss the interrelationship between the salticids’ uniquely acute vision, their predatory strategies, and their apparent cognitive abilities, we need to offer some sense of what kind of animal a jumping spider is; to do this, we attempt to offer some insight into what we might call Portia’s personality.
    [Show full text]
  • Motion-In-Depth Perception and Prey Capture in the Praying Mantis Sphodromantis Lineola
    © 2019. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | Journal of Experimental Biology (2019) 222, jeb198614. doi:10.1242/jeb.198614 RESEARCH ARTICLE Motion-in-depth perception and prey capture in the praying mantis Sphodromantis lineola Vivek Nityananda1,*, Coline Joubier1,2, Jerry Tan1, Ghaith Tarawneh1 and Jenny C. A. Read1 ABSTRACT prey as they come near. Just as with depth perception, several cues Perceiving motion-in-depth is essential to detecting approaching could contribute to the perception of motion-in-depth. or receding objects, predators and prey. This can be achieved Two of the motion-in-depth cues that have received the most using several cues, including binocular stereoscopic cues such attention in humans are binocular: changing disparity and as changing disparity and interocular velocity differences, and interocular velocity differences (IOVDs) (Cormack et al., 2017). monocular cues such as looming. Although these have been Stereoscopic disparity refers to the difference in the position of an studied in detail in humans, only looming responses have been well object as seen by the two eyes. This disparity reflects the distance to characterized in insects and we know nothing about the role of an object. Thus as an object approaches, the disparity between the stereoscopic cues and how they might interact with looming cues. We two views changes. This changing disparity cue suffices to create a used our 3D insect cinema in a series of experiments to investigate perception of motion-in-depth for human observers, even in the the role of the stereoscopic cues mentioned above, as well as absence of other cues (Cumming and Parker, 1994).
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    CURRICULUM VITAE Lawrence E. Hurd Phone: (540) 458-8484 Department of Biology FAX: 540-458-8012 Washington & Lee University Email: [email protected] Lexington, Virginia 24450 USA Education: B.A., Hiram College, 1969 Ph.D., Syracuse University, 1972 Positions (in reverse chronological order): Herwick Professor of Biology, Washington & Lee University 2008-present; Pesquisador Visitante Especial, Universidade Federal do Amazonas (UFAM) 2013-2015. Editor- in-Chief,Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 2007 – present. Research supported by John T. Herwick Endowment, Brazilian research fellowship from CAPES, and by Lenfest faculty research grants from Washington and Lee University. Head of Department of Biology, Washington and Lee University, 1993-2008. Editorial Board of Oecologia, 1997 - 2003. Professor of Biology, Program in Ecology, School of Life and Health Sciences, and member of Graduate Faculty, University of Delaware, 1973-1993. Joint appointments: (1) College of Marine Studies (1974-1984); (2) Department of Entomology and Applied Ecology, College of Agriculture (1985-1993). Research supported by grants from NSF, NOAA (Sea Grant), and UDRF (U. Del.). Postdoctoral Fellow, Cornell University, 1972 - 1973. Studies of population genetics and agro-ecosystems with D. Pimentel. Supported by grant from Ford Foundation to DP. Postdoctoral Fellow, Costa Rica, summer 1972. Behavioral ecology of tropical hummingbirds with L. L. Wolf. Supported by NSF grant to LLW. Memberships: American Association for the Advancement of Science Linnean Society
    [Show full text]
  • Mantis Study Group Newsletter, 10 (November 1998)
    ISSN 1364-3193 Mantis Study Group Newsletter 10 November 1998 Newsletter Editor Membership Secretary Phil Bragg Paul Taylor 8 The Lane 24 Forge Road Awsworth Shustoke Nottingham Coleshill NG162QP Birmingham B46 2AD Editorial I apologise for the late publication of this newsletter. This is due largely to moving house - the last newsletter was not really affected since it was more or less done before I moved - and starting a new job, and a large number of exhibitions to attend at weekends have caused a backlog of correspondence. Thanks to those of you that have sent in contributions for the newsletter, and apologies to the two people whose articles are still waiting to be typed up, they will appear in the next issue. On the subject of typing up articles, it is helpful if you can submit your articles on disk. However, if you send articles on disk please send them in WordPerfect 5.1 if possible (Users of Word can save files in Wordperfect 5.1 by using the "save as" option under the "File" menu). If this is not possible please send a copy in ASCII (DOS-text). Please note that I cannot read Word files and with my current job I only have access to a machine which can convert the files about once every ten weeks, and that cannot read versions as recent as Word 97. Membership renewals - Paul Taylor. Members will find attached to this Newsletter membership renewal forms for 1999. Members will be pleased to note that there is no increase in membership fees for this coming year.
    [Show full text]
  • Data for Praying Mantis Mitochondrial Genomes and Phylogenetic Constructions Within Mantodea
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Carleton University's Institutional Repository Data in Brief 21 (2018) 1277–1285 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Data in Brief journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/dib Data Article Data for praying mantis mitochondrial genomes and phylogenetic constructions within Mantodea Le-Ping Zhang a, Dan-Na Yu a,b, Kenneth B. Storey c, Hong-Yi Cheng a, Jia-Yong Zhang a,b,c,n a College of Chemistry and Life Science, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321004, Zhejiang Province, China b Key Lab of Wildlife Biotechnology, Conservation and Utilization of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, Zhejiang Province, China c Department of Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1S 5B6 article info abstract Article history: In this data article, we provide five datasets of mantis mitochon- Received 11 January 2018 drial genomes: (1) PCG123: nucleotide sequences of 13 protein- Received in revised form coding genes including all codon positions; (2) PCG123R: 14 March 2018 nucleotide sequences of two rRNAs and 13 protein-coding genes Accepted 22 October 2018 including all codon positions; (3) PCG12: nucleotide sequences of Available online 25 October 2018 13 protein-coding genes without third codon positions; (4) PCG12R: nucleotide sequences of two rRNAs and 13 protein- coding genes without third codon positions, and (5) PCGAA: amino acid sequences of 13 protein-coding genes. These were used to construct phylogenetic relationships within Mantodea and the phylogenetic trees inferred from Bayesian analysis using two data sets (PCG12R, PCGAA) and Maximum Likelihood analysis using four data sets (PCG123, PCG12, PCG12R and PCGAA).
    [Show full text]
  • College of Arts and Sciences Annual Report 2013-2014
    CCOOLLLLEEGGEE OOFF AARRTTSS AANNDD SSCCIIEENNCCEESS AANNNNUUAALL RREEPPOORRTT 22001133--22001144 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 African and African American Studies 5 Anthropology 16 Art 29 Biology 39 Chemistry 57 College of Arts and Sciences Education Program (CASEP) 74 Communication, Media and Theatre 80 Computer Science 110 Earth Science NA Economics 116 English 125 English Language Program 157 Geography and Environmental Studies 163 History 168 Justice Studies 178 Latino and Latin-American Studies 190 Linguistics 199 Mathematics 211 Mathematics Development 222 Music and Dance Program 227 Office of Cultural Events 261 Philosophy 263 Physics 273 Political Science 279 Psychology and Gerontology MA Program 285 Social Work 325 Sociology 350 Student Center for Science Engagement (SCSE) 372 Teaching English as a Second/Foreign Language 386 Women‘s and Gender Studies 393 World Languages and Cultures 406 2 CCOOLLLLEEGGEE OOFF AARRTTSS AANNDD SSCCIIEENNCCEESS AANNNNUUAALL RREEPPOORRTT Executive Summary The College of Arts and Sciences was active in the 2013-2014 academic year, working to meet the needs of our students and maintaining a strong focus on student retention, success, and graduation. New programs were developed, such as the EMERGE summer program, which prepares new students in the areas of Math and English Language, as well as the MARC (Minority Access to Research Careers) Program, which is designed to prepare underrepresented minority students for careers in science. Progress was also made in developing NEIU‘s General Education Program into a University Core Curriculum, which includes more opportunities for engaged learning experiences. As you will find in this year‘s report, CAS programs have hosted career fairs, alumni events, student awards ceremonies, café societies, brown bag seminars and speaker series; and they have established scholarships for students.
    [Show full text]
  • Size and Distance Perception in the Praying Mantis
    Submitted to Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B - Issue Small or far away? Size and distance perception in the praying mantis. For ReviewJournal: Philosophical Only Transactions B Manuscript ID RSTB-2015-0262.R1 Article Type: Research Date Submitted by the Author: n/a Complete List of Authors: Nityananda, Vivek; Newcastle University, Institute of Neuroscience Bissiana, Geoffrey; University of Rennes, Comportement Animal et Humain Tarawneh, Ghaith; Newcastle University, Institute of Neuroscience Read, Jennifer; Newcastle University, Institute of Neuroscience Issue Code: Click <a href=http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/site/misc/issue- 3DVIS codes.xhtml target=_new>here</a> to find the code for your issue.: Behaviour < BIOLOGY, Neuroscience < Subject: BIOLOGY, Ecology < BIOLOGY, Evolution < BIOLOGY Size constancy, Stereo vision, Sphodromantis Keywords: lineola http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/issue-ptrsb Page 1 of 26 Submitted to Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B - Issue 1 2 3 1 Small or far away? Size and distance perception in the praying mantis. 4 5 2 Vivek Nityananda 1*, Geoffrey Bissianna1,2 , Ghaith Tarawneh 1, Jenny Read 1 6 7 8 3 1. Institute of Neuroscience, Henry Wellcome building for Neuroecology, Newcastle University, 9 4 Framlington Place, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom NE2 4HH 10 11 12 5 2. M2 Comportement Animal et Humain, École doctorale de Rennes, Vie Agro Santé, University of 13 6 Rennes 1, 35000, Rennes, France 14 15 7 16 17 8 Corresponding author: 18 9 Vivek Nityananda For Review Only 19 20 10 Institute of Neuroscience, 21 22 11 Henry Wellcome building for Neuroecology, 23 12 Newcastle University, 24 25 13 Framlington Place, 26 14 Newcastle Upon Tyne, 27 28 15 United Kingdom 29 30 16 NE2 4HH 31 17 Email: [email protected] 32 33 18 Ph: +441912086246 34 35 19 36 37 20 Abstract 38 39 40 21 Stereo vision is an important but costly process seen in several evolutionary distinct lineages 41 22 including primates, birds and insects.
    [Show full text]
  • 10 Fascinating Praying Mantis Facts
    10 Fascinating Praying Mantis facts 1. Praying Mantises live in the tropics Of approximately 2,000 species of mantids described to date, almost all are tropical creatures. Just 18 native species are known from the entire North American continent. About 80% of all members of the order Mantodea belong to a single family, the Mantidae. 2. The Mantises We See Most Often in the U.S. Are Exotic Species You're more likely to find an introduced mantid species than you are to find a native praying mantis. The Chinese mantis (Tenodera aridifolia) was introduced near Philadelphia, PA about 80 years ago. This large mantid can measure up to 100 mm in length. The European mantid, Mantis religiosa, is pale green and about half the size of the Chinese mantid. European mantids were introduced near Rochester, NY nearly a century ago. Both the Chinese and Europeanmantids are common in the northeastern U.S. today. 3. Mantises Can Turn Their Heads a Full 180 Degrees Try to sneak up on a praying mantis, and you may be startled when it looks over its shoulder at you. No other insect can do so. Praying mantids have a flexible joint between the head and prothorax that enables them to swivel their heads. This ability, along with their rather humanoid faces and long, grasping forelegs, endears them to even the most entomophobic people among us. 1 4. Mantises Are Closely Related to Cockroaches and Termites These three seemingly different insects – mantids, termites, and cockroaches – are believed to descend from a common ancestor. In fact, some entomologists group these insects in a superorder (Dictyoptera), due to their close evolutionary relationships.
    [Show full text]
  • Mantis Study Group Newsletter, 1 (August 1996)
    ISSN 1364-3193 Mantis Study Group Newsletter 1 August 1996 Editorial Welcome to the first MSG Newsletter. Some of you will be aware of how the group was formed; others may not, so here is a bit of the background. My main interest is in phasmids but I also collect a few mantids and cockroaches on my visits to Borneo, and I rear a few other species at home. Over the past few years I have been getting an increasing number of letters and phone calls from people requesting advice or information about mantids. Requests varied from basic care information to detailed questions on identification and natural history. Eventually I decided that there was sufficient interest to make it worthwhile forming a group to try to make information more widely available. Several people I have spoken to have said they had also been thinking about forming a group, so there seemed to be sufficient interest! The MSG was founded on 18th May 1996 at a meeting at Dudley Zoo, the meeting was held in conjunction with the Blattodea Culture Group. At the meeting people were appointed to take responsibility for four areas: Newsletter Editor Livestock co-ordination Phil Bragg Steve Clark 51, Longfield Lane. 41B Macbean Street I1keston, Woolwich Derbyshire. London DE74DX. SEl86LW U.K. U.K. Tel: 0115-9305010 Tel: 0181-854-1159 Newsletter, printing & distribution Membership Secretary & Treasurer Kieren Pitts Paul Taylor 17 Priory Road 24, Forge Road, Exeter Shustoke, Devon Coleshill, EX47AW Birmingham. U.K. B462AU. Tel: 01392-427919 U.K. Tel: 01675-481578 David Yager (Maryland, USA) supplied a long list of people that he knew to had an interest in mantids so, combining this with my own list, over 100 membership forms were sent out with in the first two weeks of the group being formed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cervical Sclerites of Mantodea Discussed in the Context of Dic - Tyop Teran Phylogeny (Insecta: Dictyoptera)
    Entomologische Abhandlungen 63 (1–2): 51–76 © Museum für Tierkunde Dresden, ISSN 0373-8981, 23.06.200651 The cervical sclerites of Mantodea discussed in the context of dic - tyop teran phylogeny (Insecta: Dictyoptera) FRANK WIELAND Zoologisches Institut und Zoologisches Museum, Abt. für Morphologie, Systematik und Evolutionsbiologie, Georg-August- Universität, Berliner Str. 28, 37073 Göttingen, Germany [[email protected]] Abstract. The ventral cervical sclerites, lateral cervical sclerites, and intercervical sclerites of 30 mantodean, 7 “blattarian”, and 4 isopteran species have been studied. This leads to new insights into the dictyopteran ground plan, autapomorphies for several taxa, and the evolution of the mantodean cervical region. It remains unclear if a lack or the presence of one or two ventral cervical sclerites (vcs) has to be assumed for the dictyopteran ground plan. The state of reduction of the vcs in Phyllocrania and Gongylus, however, supports a close relationship of Empusidae and certain Hymenopodidae. A weak, setae-bearing sclerite (sbs) posterior to the ventral cervical sclerites in Cryptocercus is probably autapomorphic. A transverse position of the intercervical sclerites (ics) is a ground plan feature of Dictyoptera and probably autapomorphic for the group. The presence of a groove (lcvg) on the lateral cervical sclerites is also hypothesized as autapomorphic for Dictyoptera with a convergent loss or partial reduction in several “Blattaria” lineages, in Isoptera, and in Metallyticus. A midventral fusion of the intercervical sclerites (ics) has probably taken place in the stem species of Mantoidea with a secondary separation in Theopompella, Ameles and Empusa. Two equally parsimonious hypotheses have been found for the evolution of the torus intercervicalis (ticv) with either a single gain in the ground plan of Mantodea except Mantoida and several losses within the group, or three separate gains in Chaeteessa, Metallyticus and the stem-species of Mantoidea with several losses within the latter.
    [Show full text]