DOCSLIB.ORG

Global Anti-Corruption Policy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Global Anti-Corruption Policy Global Anti-Corruption Policy Introduction dealings. Team Members must exercise FedEx is committed to doing business ethically appropriate oversight over their area of and in compliance with the law. An important responsibilities and maintain adequate internal part of that commitment – and our commitment financial controls and keep accurate books and to integrity – is our strong opposition to records so as not to allow Bribes or other Corruption and Bribery in any form. Improper Payments to occur and be disguised as legitimate business expenses. FedEx operates in more than 220 countries and territories around the world. Our global network Scope of operations offers both distinct opportunities This Policy applies to every officer, director, and risks. To help protect our company and manager and employee of FedEx Corporation and reputation, we must comply with the law, avoid its subsidiary companies (each, a “Team doing business with those who do not respect the Member”). law, and understand and address our risks Definitions wherever they exist. “Bribery” or “Bribe”: anything of value offered, Policy Overview given or received in exchange for a favorable FedEx prohibits Corruption and Improper decision or exercise of discretion by a Government Payments in all our business dealings throughout Official or private person. the world. Team Members must not directly or “Corruption”: dishonest or fraudulent conduct, indirectly, offer, authorize, request, give or including the misuse or abuse of power, influence receive anything of value to or from any person or or position; some common types include organization to obtain or retain business or kickbacks, Bribery, influence peddling and influence a decision or action. extortion. Team Members also must not participate in or “Facilitating Payment”: anything of value, allow Corruption to influence a business decision typically a small payment or gift, offered or or gain an undue business advantage. provided to a Government Official to facilitate or expedite routine clerical or administrative, non- Objectivity, fairness, transparency and diligence discretionary actions such as inspecting goods in are key to avoiding Corruption in our business 1 transit, issuing permits and/or licenses, processing “Management”: any Team Member of FedEx visas or providing police protection. managing at least one other employee. For purposes of the approval process under this Policy, “Government Official(s)”: any elected or Management refers to the immediate supervisor appointed officer, employee or other person of the person seeking approval or a more senior performing service on behalf of a government, member of Management with appropriate government agency, state-owned or -controlled decision-making authority. entity, military, political party, or public international organization. This definition includes Corruption, Improper Payments and Bribes both U.S. and non-U.S. Government Officials. FedEx and the Third Parties with whom we do “Improper Payments”: anything of value used to business enable trade by connecting people, corruptly influence the decision or action of a goods, businesses and markets around the world. Government Official, private person or business. Corruption risk appears in different forms and Includes Bribes, Facilitating Payments and levels throughout the world. Corruption can be kickbacks. tied to government or private activities and can “Third Party”: any prospective or current non- occur in a number of situations we may encounter FedEx entity, customer, vendor, supplier, service in our work, such as: at border crossings during provider or any other person with whom FedEx customs clearance; in business solicitation, does or may do business. negotiations, meetings or transactions; when interacting with Government Officials; or related “Promotional Item”: goods prominently featuring to entertainment, social, political or charitable the FedEx corporate brand or logo. These items matters. are generally available in the company store or catalog. FedEx Team Members must be able to recognize Corruption risk in their work and be alert to “Team Members”: every officer, director, situations where prohibited activity such as manager and employee of FedEx Corporation and requests for Bribes or other illegal activities may its subsidiary companies. occur. Upon recognizing the risk, Team Members must uphold our strong opposition to Corruption 2 and Bribery by refusing to approve or participate in corrupt schemes or deals and immediately Understanding Bribery reporting such prohibited activity to your company’s Legal Department as soon as you learn Anything of value offered, given or received in of it. exchange for a favorable decision or exercise of discretion by a Government Official or private Facilitating Payments person is a Bribe. Bribery and Improper Payments Anything of value, typically a small payment can be anything of value including: or gift, offered or provided to a Government Money Official to expedite routine clerical or Kickbacks administrative, non-discretionary actions Unposted fees such as inspecting goods in transit, issuing Unwarranted discounts permits and/or licenses, processing visas or Payments disguised as commissions providing police protection. Travel, meals, lodging, gifts and entertainment FedEx prohibits Facilitating Payments Favors because they violate the anti-corruption laws Charitable and political contributions of most countries, are often poorly Jobs and internships documented and tend to encourage and perpetuate Corruption. If you are asked to pay a Facilitating Payment, refuse and immediately contact your company’s Legal Department. Official fees, documented in writing, that are required by a government to perform certain legitimate services are not considered Facilitating Payments. 3 Travel, Meals, Lodging, Gifts & Entertainment Team Members must exercise care, know the Travel, Meals, Lodging, Gifts & rules and obtain any required approvals before Entertainment Reminders for Non-U.S. offering or providing travel, meals, lodging, gifts or Government Officials: entertainment to a Government Official or private Don’t give cash, gift cards or other cash person. These actions, if done incorrectly, at the equivalents. wrong time, too often or in excessive amounts, When allowed, Promotional Items are could be considered a Bribe or Improper Payment. preferred as gifts and you should first ask, Knowing the rules and getting advice and can you accept a ____ (noting type of approvals in advance will help you understand not item)? only what is prohibited but also what may be Don’t use your own money, petty cash, or appropriate and allowed in each situation. third-party funds to pay for something that FedEx wouldn’t allow you to submit Before offering or providing travel, meals, lodging, as a business expense. gifts or entertainment to U.S. Government Officials, Team Members must obtain advance, Travel, meals, lodging, gifts or written approval from the FedEx Corporation entertainment expenses must not be Government Affairs Department. extravagant and expenses and attendance of any non-FedEx guests, such as Remember to also review the Global Gifts & significant others, requires advance Entertainment Policy when offering or receiving approval from your Legal Department. gifts to or from Third Parties. 4 If a Government Official is involved, review the Charitable Contributions background and reputation of the intended recipient and get prior written approval of Corrupt individuals and enterprises can use your company’s Legal Department. charitable organizations as a front to funnel money to themselves in exchange for making a Your company may have other policies that relate to charitable contributions (such as who may offer favorable decision to benefit the donor. For this them or the criteria to be followed). Team reason, charitable contributions are considered a Members must comply with all relevant policies potential source of Bribery risk. Never provide a charitable contribution to obtain or retain before making a charitable contribution on behalf of FedEx. business or gain any other advantage or favorable treatment. When considering any charitable Political Contributions donations, remember the following: Corrupt individuals may offer to make favorable Verify the charity is legitimate and the decisions in exchange for contributions to certain donation is for proper charitable purposes; political campaigns where they can access the funds for their personal use, particularly in regions Review the facts, intent, timing, parties and with high Corruption risk. any relationship to ongoing discussions or deals to ensure there are no concerns of At FedEx, we prohibit Team Members from Corruption; making or authorizing a political contribution to a Government Official or political party, whether in Disclose to your company’s Legal Department cash or in kind, by or on behalf of FedEx. any business dealings FedEx has with any Third Party that has encouraged FedEx to make a Some examples of prohibited activities include: charitable contribution; Making a financial donation to a political party Confirm that the donation would not violate or campaign on behalf of FedEx. the law and complies with FedEx policies and Loaning Team Members to work for a political procedures; and party or campaign, including allowing Team 5 Members to use paid leave of absence or Every Team Member has a responsibility to help additional vacation time for such work. recognize,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Combating Corruption in Latin America: Congressional Considerations
    Combating Corruption in Latin America: Congressional Considerations May 21, 2019 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45733 SUMMARY R45733 Combating Corruption in Latin America May 21, 2019 Corruption of public officials in Latin America continues to be a prominent political concern. In the past few years, 11 presidents and former presidents in Latin America have been forced from June S. Beittel, office, jailed, or are under investigation for corruption. As in previous years, Transparency Coordinator International’s Corruption Perceptions Index covering 2018 found that the majority of Analyst in Latin American respondents in several Latin American nations believed that corruption was increasing. Several Affairs analysts have suggested that heightened awareness of corruption in Latin America may be due to several possible factors: the growing use of social media to reveal violations and mobilize Peter J. Meyer citizens, greater media and investor scrutiny, or, in some cases, judicial and legislative Specialist in Latin investigations. Moreover, as expectations for good government tend to rise with greater American Affairs affluence, the expanding middle class in Latin America has sought more integrity from its politicians. U.S. congressional interest in addressing corruption comes at a time of this heightened rejection of corruption in public office across several Latin American and Caribbean Clare Ribando Seelke countries. Specialist in Latin American Affairs Whether or not the perception that corruption is increasing is accurate, it is nevertheless fueling civil society efforts to combat corrupt behavior and demand greater accountability. Voter Maureen Taft-Morales discontent and outright indignation has focused on bribery and the economic consequences of Specialist in Latin official corruption, diminished public services, and the link of public corruption to organized American Affairs crime and criminal impunity.
    [Show full text]
  • Key 2017 Developments in Latin American Anti-Corruption Enforcement
    March 15, 2018 KEY 2017 DEVELOPMENTS IN LATIN AMERICAN ANTI-CORRUPTION ENFORCEMENT To Our Clients and Friends: In 2017, several Latin American countries stepped up enforcement and legislative efforts to address corruption in the region. Enforcement activity regarding alleged bribery schemes involving construction conglomerate Odebrecht rippled across Latin America's business and political environments during the year, with allegations stemming from Brazil's ongoing Operation Car Wash investigation leading to prosecutions in neighboring countries. Simultaneously, governments in Latin America have made efforts to strengthen legislative regimes to combat corruption, including expanding liability provisions targeting foreign companies and private individuals. This update focuses on five Latin American countries (Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, Colombia, and Peru) that have ramped up anti-corruption enforcement or passed legislation expanding anti-corruption legal regimes.[1] New laws in the region, coupled with potentially renewed prosecutorial vigor to enforce them, make it imperative for companies operating in Latin America to have robust compliance programs, as well as vigilance regarding enforcement trends impacting their industries. 1. Mexico Notable Enforcement Actions and Investigations In 2017, Petróleos Mexicanos ("Pemex") disclosed that Mexico's Ministry of the Public Function (SFP) initiated eight administrative sanctions proceedings in connection with contract irregularities involving Odebrecht affiliates.[2] The inquiries stem from a 2016 Odebrecht deferred prosecution agreement ("DPA") with the U.S. Department of Justice ("DOJ").[3] According to the DPA, Odebrecht made corrupt payments totaling $10.5 million USD to Mexican government officials between 2010 and 2014 to secure public contracts.[4] In September 2017, Mexico's SFP released a statement noting the agency had identified $119 million pesos (approx.
    [Show full text]
  • Turning the Tide on Dirty Money Why the World’S Democracies Need a Global Kleptocracy Initiative
    GETTY IMAGES Turning the Tide on Dirty Money Why the World’s Democracies Need a Global Kleptocracy Initiative By Trevor Sutton and Ben Judah February 2021 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG Contents 1 Preface 3 Introduction and summary 6 How dirty money went global and why efforts to stop it have failed 10 Why illicit finance and kleptocracy are a threat to global democracy and should be a foreign policy priority 13 The case for optimism: Why democracies have a structural advantage against kleptocracy 18 How to harden democratic defenses against kleptocracy: Key principles and areas for improvement 21 Recommendations 28 Conclusion 29 Corruption and kleptocracy: Key definitions and concepts 31 About the authors and acknowledgments 32 Endnotes Preface Transparency and honest government are the lifeblood of democracy. Trust in democratic institutions depends on the integrity of public servants, who are expected to put the common good before their own interests and faithfully observe the law. When officials violate that duty, democracy is at risk. No country is immune to corruption. As representatives of three important democratic societies—the United States, the European Union, and the United Kingdom—we recognize that corruption is an affront to our shared values, one that threatens the resiliency and cohesion of democratic governments around the globe and undermines the relationship between the state and its citizens. For that reason, we welcome the central recommendation of this report that the world’s democracies should work together to increase transparency in the global economy and limit the pernicious influence of corruption, kleptocracy, and illicit finance on democratic institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Corruption Risks in Sri Lanka
    CORRUPTION RISKS IN SRI LANKA The overarching power and influence of the executive is weakening the national integrity system of Sri Lanka. KEY FINDINGS Erosion of checks and balances KEY FACTS: CORRUPTION The centralisation of power on the executive has eroded the constitutional checks and balances, leading to abuse of power PERCEPTIONS INDEX 2013 and widespread misappropriation of funds. The supremacy of the legislature as the mandate of the people has been challenged RANK: SCORE: along with the independence of the judicial system. 91/177 37/100 Politicisation of the public sector The independence of the public sector suffers from political What does this mean? influence. Although the Public Service Commission oversees the The Corruption Perceptions Index measures the appointments, promotions, transfers, discipline and dismissals of perceived levels of public sector corruption, scoring public officers, the commission itself is appointed by the from 0 (highly corrupt) to 100 (very clean). A score president. of less than 50 indicates a serious corruption problem. Gaps in the anti-corruption mechanism Sri Lanka’s Bribery Act of 1994 is yet to undergo any revision or update. The current act does not include private and civil society sectors and does not conform to the provisions of the United Nations Convention against Corruption. Nepal 6% 22% 72% Pakistan 8% 19% 72% Percentage (%) of people in South Asian countries on how the level of corruption in India 7% 23% 70% their respective country has changed over the previous two years. South Asia 14% 21% 66% Countries are listed according to the percentage Sri Lanka 18% 19% 64% of respondents who felt corruption had increased.
    [Show full text]
  • CORRUPTION LAWS a Non-Lawyers’ Guide to Laws and Offences in the UK Relating to Corrupt Behaviour
    CORRUPTION LAWS A non-lawyers’ guide to laws and offences in the UK relating to corrupt behaviour Transparency International (TI) is the world’s leading non- governmental anti-corruption organisation. With more than 100 chapters worldwide, TI has extensive global expertise and understanding of corruption. Transparency International UK (TI-UK) is the UK chapter of TI. We raise awareness about corruption; advocate legal and regulatory reform at national and international levels; design practical tools for institutions, individuals and companies wishing to combat corruption; and act as a leading centre of anti-corruption expertise in the UK. Acknowledgements: we would like to thank those who have supported and advised us in producing this publication, including Jeremy Coleman, Andrew Sheftel and Sam Eastwood of Norton Rose Fulbright, Michael Bowes QC, Brooks Hickman, Transparency International UK’s Jameela Raymond, Michael Petkov, Steve Goodrich, Ben Wheatland and Kevin Bridgewater, and Peters & Peters. Authors: Nick Maxwell and Ben Cowdock Editor: Robert Barrington Design: Philip Jones © 2016 Transparency International UK. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in parts is permitted, providing that full credit is given to Transparency International UK (TI-UK) and provided that any such reproduction, in whole or in parts, is not sold or incorporated in works that are sold. Written permission must be sought from Transparency International UK if any such reproduction would adapt or modify the original content. Published May 2016. ISBN: 978-1-910778-54-8 © Cover photo: iStock.com/MWelsh Every effort has been made to verify the accuracy of the information contained in this report. All information was believed to be correct as of May 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Corruption in Mexico
    MEASURING CORRUPTION IN MEXICO Jose I. Rodriguez-Sanchez, Ph.D. Postdoctoral Research Fellow in International Trade, Mexico Center December 2018 © 2018 by the James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy of Rice University This material may be quoted or reproduced without prior permission, provided appropriate credit is given to the author and the James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy. Wherever feasible, papers are reviewed by outside experts before they are released. However, the research and views expressed in this paper are those of the individual researcher(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy. Jose I. Rodriguez-Sanchez, Ph.D. “Measuring Corruption in Mexico” Measuring Corruption in Mexico Introduction Corruption is a complex problem affecting all societies, and it has many different causes and consequences. Its consequences include negative impacts on economic growth and development, magnifying effects on poverty and inequality, and corrosive effects on legal systems and governance institutions. Corruption in the form of embezzlement or misappropriation of public funds, for example, diverts valuable economic resources that could be used on education, health care, infrastructure, or food security, while simultaneously eroding faith in the government. Calculating and measuring the impact of corruption and its tangible and intangible costs are essential to combating it. But before corruption can be measured, it must first be defined. Decision-makers have often resorted to defining corruption in a certain area or location by listing specific acts that they consider corrupt. Such definitions, however, are limited because they are context-specific and depend on how individual governments decide to approach the problem.
    [Show full text]
  • The Prosecution of Corruption As a Political Strategy* This Is a Rough
    The Prosecution of Corruption as a Political Strategy* Daniel Zirker University of Waikato Hamilton, New Zealand *This paper has been prepared for presentation at the annual meeting of the IPPA, June 26-July 1, 2018, Pittsburg. I would likewould like to thank the administrator of political science at the University of Waikato, Frances Douch, and the Dean of Arts and Social Sciences, Allison Kirkman, for their help in facilitating the presentation of this paper. The conclusions of the paper, and the analyses herein, are my own. Abstract: The Prosecution of Corruption as a Political Strategy The prosecution of corruption in developing countries has received increasing attention as the understanding and technology of corruption abatement has improved, as per key scholars in the field (Klitgaard 1988; Rose-Ackermann 1999; Johnston 2005; Quah 2013; Lamsdorff, ) among others. Pressures from the World Bank and the IMF, as well as from foreign aid- granting agencies in Europe and North America, have encouraged a range of developing and more developed countries long beset with both 'need' and 'greed corruption' to show tangible results in their prosecution of corrupt practices. In a number of such countries (e.g., Tanzania, the BRICS countries), however, these prosecutions have apparently come to represent strategies in banal power struggles, show trials that remove potential rivals from political contention. This paper will compare and contrast cases in Tanzania and the BRICS countries, among others, in an effort to shed light on the apparently unintended, and even corrupting, effects of global pressures to reduce corruption, and the promise and pitfalls of such prosecutions in the context of domestic political contestation.
    [Show full text]
  • Corruption in Africa: Cultural, Economic and Political Factors
    CORRUPTION IN AFRICA: CULTURAL, ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL FACTORS WHICH IMPACT CORRUPTION AND POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS By ROBERT M. KELLY A capstone submitted to the Graduate School-Camden Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Arts Graduate Program in Liberal Studies written under the direction of Dr. Stuart Charme and approved by _________________________ Dr. S. Ayubi Camden, New Jersey, May 2014 i CAPSTONE ABSTRACT CORRUPTION IN AFRICA: CULTURAL, ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL FACTORS WHICH IMPACT CORRUPTION AND POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS BY ROBERT M. KELLY Capstone Director: Dr. S. Ayubi An examination into corruption within Africa reveals that certain factors make it different than those shown in Europe, and particularly those countries that rely on one or two major sources of natural resources such as Nigeria and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, tend to exacerbate corruption within those nations. There are several solutions, such as political which have the potential to reduce corruption, however economic development and the creation of a stable middle class holds the best promise to mitigate the worst effects. ii Table of Contents Introduction page 1 Corruption Defined: Cultural, Economic and Political page 1 Is Corruption a Necessary Evil? page 9 Elementary Factors of Corruption in Africa and Nigeria page 11 Corruption and the “Resource Curse” page 15 Congo’s “Curse” page 18 Examining Corruption Through Cultural Lenses page 20 Economic Factors of African Corruption page 22 Bad Politics Invites Bad Behavior page 25 Economic Solutions – False and Otherwise page 28 Is Culture to Blame? page 31 Political Solutions page 33 Conclusion page 36 Bibliography page 37 iii 1 Introduction Africa is saddled with many challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • Corruption: Causes, Consequences and Cures
    Asia-Pacific Development Journal Vol. 7, No. 2, December 2000 CORRUPTION: CAUSES, CONSEQUENCES AND CURES U Myint* The paper stresses the need to keep the issue of corruption squarely in view in the development agenda. It discusses the causes and consequences of corruption, especially in the context of a least developed country with considerable regulation and central direction. Lack of transparency, accountability and consistency, as well as institutional weaknesses such as in the legislative and judicial systems, provide fertile ground for growth of rent seeking activities in such a country. In addition to the rise of an underground economy and the high social costs associated with corruption, its adverse consequences on income distribution, consumption patterns, investment, the government budget and on economic reforms are highlighted in the paper. The paper also touches upon the supply side of bribery and its international dimensions and presents some thoughts on how to address the corruption issue and to try and bring it under control. There is a growing worldwide concern over corruption at the present time. Several factors are responsible for this. First, a consensus has now been reached that corruption is universal. It exists in all countries, both developed and developing, in the public and private sectors, as well as in non-profit and charitable organizations. Second, allegations and charges of corruption now play a more central role in politics than at any other time. Governments have fallen, careers of world renowned public figures ruined, and reputations of well-respected organizations and business firms badly tarnished on account of it. The international mass media feeds on it and scandals and improper conduct, especially of those in high places, are looked upon as extremely newsworthy, and to be investigated with zeal and vigour.
    [Show full text]
  • Combating Corruption in Latin America: Congressional Considerations
    Combating Corruption in Latin America: Congressional Considerations May 21, 2019 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45733 SUMMARY R45733 Combating Corruption in Latin America May 21, 2019 Corruption of public officials in Latin America continues to be a prominent political concern. In the past few years, 11 presidents and former presidents in Latin America have been forced from June S. Beittel, office, jailed, or are under investigation for corruption. As in previous years, Transparency Coordinator International’s Corruption Perceptions Index covering 2018 found that the majority of Analyst in Latin American respondents in several Latin American nations believed that corruption was increasing. Several Affairs analysts have suggested that heightened awareness of corruption in Latin America may be due to several possible factors: the growing use of social media to reveal violations and mobilize Peter J. Meyer citizens, greater media and investor scrutiny, or, in some cases, judicial and legislative Specialist in Latin investigations. Moreover, as expectations for good government tend to rise with greater American Affairs affluence, the expanding middle class in Latin America has sought more integrity from its politicians. U.S. congressional interest in addressing corruption comes at a time of this heightened rejection of corruption in public office across several Latin American and Caribbean Clare Ribando Seelke countries. Specialist in Latin American Affairs Whether or not the perception that corruption is increasing is accurate, it is nevertheless fueling civil society efforts to combat corrupt behavior and demand greater accountability. Voter Maureen Taft-Morales discontent and outright indignation has focused on bribery and the economic consequences of Specialist in Latin official corruption, diminished public services, and the link of public corruption to organized American Affairs crime and criminal impunity.
    [Show full text]
  • Manifestations and Causes of Civil Service Corruption in Developing Countries
    Journal of Public Administration and Governance ISSN 2161-7104 2019, Vol. 9, No. 3 Manifestations and Causes of Civil Service Corruption in Developing Countries Yemane Desta Department of Public Administration, University of Asmara, Eritrea Received: June 16, 2019 Accepted: July 11, 2019 Online published: July 28, 2019 doi:10.5296/jpag.v9i3.14930 URL: https://doi.org/10.5296/jpag.v9i3.14930 Abstract This article examines the manifestations and causes of civil service corrupt practices in the context of developing countries based on review of theoretical and empirical literature regarding corruptiion in the context of developing countries. The article identified the most common forms of corruption including bribery, embezzlement, fraud, extortion, abuse of power, conflict of interest, insider trading/abuse of privileged information, favoritism, collusion with business interests, procurement contract/bid rigging and influence peddling. The findings of the study indicate that the main drivers of civil service corruption in developing countries are politicization of the civil service, poor pay, lack of accountability/transparency in public organizations, weak enforcements mechanisms, lack of merit-based career advancement, and excessive/ opaque regulations. The findings reported this article reveal that corruption in the civil service and overall corruption levels in politics, economy, and society are very high, with the negative outcome of hampering economic growth, sabotaging social justice and contributing to political instability. Keywords: accountability, civil service, corruption, developing countries 1. Introduction Corruption, broadly defined as the abuse of public office for private gain by the World- Bank, has been acknowledged as a universal problem. (World Bank,1997). Corruption which constitutes ethical violation on the part of public officials including the elected (politicians) and appointed (civil servants) poses a serious challenge to public trust.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fight Against Trading in Influence
    ISSN 1648–2603 (print) VIEŠOJI POLITIKA IR ADMINISTRAVIMAS ISSN 2029-2872 (online) PUBLIC POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION 2011, T. 10, Nr. 1, p. 53-66 The Fight against Trading in Influence Willeke Slingerland Saxion University of Applied Sciences, School of Governance & Law M. H. Tromplaan 28, 7513 AB Enschede, the Netherlands Abstract. This article explains how considering the systemic character of influence market corruption can help the Council of Europe and its Member States in their fight against trading in influence. By applying article 12 of the Council of Europe’s Criminal Convention on Corruption on two recent cases in the Netherlands and France, it is being tested whether the provision provides an effective solution for scrutinising the trading in influence phenomenon. Both cases provide an example of the trading in influence phe- nomenon, which is symptomatic in western influence markets and which has implications far greater than the ones immediately apparent. Keywords: corruption, influence peddling, trading in influence, influence markets Raktažodžiai: korupcija, prekyba įtaka mažesniu ir didesniu mastu, įtakos rinkos. Introduction A fundamental paradox in western societies has emerged: cases concerning trading in influence become more and more imminent and with it the necessity to deal effectively with this phenomenon. International conventions call for the criminalization of this form of corruption but many States are hesitant to establish this form of corruption as a criminal offence under their domestic law. Recent scandals such as the Duchess of York, Sarah Ferguson, promising access to her ex-husband Prince Andrew, who serves as a quasi-official trade envoy for Great Britain, to ‘rich businessmen’ is just one of the more obvious cases in which a person promises to exert an improper influence over the decision-making process of a public official in return for an undue advantage [8].
    [Show full text]