Observations and Models of Infrared Debris Disk Signatures and Their Evolution

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Observations and Models of Infrared Debris Disk Signatures and Their Evolution Observations and Models of Infrared Debris Disk Signatures and their Evolution Item Type text; Electronic Dissertation Authors Gaspar, Andras Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 07/10/2021 14:47:51 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/202982 OBSERVATIONS AND MODELS OF INFRARED DEBRIS DISK SIGNATURES AND THEIR EVOLUTION by Andr´as G´asp´ar A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF ASTRONOMY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2011 2 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE As members of the Dissertation Committee, we certify that we have read the dissertation prepared by Andr´as G´asp´ar entitled “Observations and models of infrared debris disk signatures and their evolution” and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Date: 3 November 2011 Dr. George Rieke Date: 3 November 2011 Dr. Dimitrios Psaltis Date: 3 November 2011 Dr. Feryal Ozel¨ Date: 3 November 2011 Dr. Kate Y. L. Su Date: 3 November 2011 Dr. D´aniel Apai Final approval and acceptance of this dissertation is contingent upon the candi- date’s submission of the final copies of the dissertation to the Graduate College. I hereby certify that I have read this dissertation prepared under my direction and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement. Date: 3 November 2011 Dissertation Director: Dr. George Rieke 3 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This dissertation has been submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the Univer- sity Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this dissertation are allowable without special permis- sion, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his or her judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author. SIGNED: Andr´as G´asp´ar 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The path one walks down to reach the stage in life where they can actually sit down to write an acknowledgment for their doctoral thesis is extremely long, full of curves and obstacles. Along the way, I have met so many people that have influenced, guided, and helped me that listing them all is mere impossible and would over-tower the thesis itself. The credit for teaching me how to write properly goes out to my Mother, who put a lot of effort into teaching me about languages and literature. Obviously, the biggest influence was that of my Father, who being a physical-chemist him- self, always bestowed the logic of a scientist on me and allowed me to pursuit and nurtured all of the interests I developed over the years. My elementary and high school physics teachers, Mih´aly Kotorm´an and Dr. Ervin Szegedi, were also invaluable in opening my eyes to the wonderful world of physics. I have great deal of appreciation for all my previous advisors who took upon the task of advising me. If it were not for Dr. L´aszl´oL. Kiss, I would definitely not have started doing research as early as I have and maybe not even in astronomy. He taught me all the initial tools an astronomer needs to know and that I still use today. Dr. Zolt´an Balog was not only a great advisor, but also a friend who I could and still can count on. It was absolutely his influence that I started working in infrared astronomy and that I applied to the University of Arizona later on. I am also thankful for Dr. Melvin G. Hoare for giving me an opportunity to work on the Science Verification phase of the UKIDSS project in Leeds, in the summer of 2005. I also thank Kate Su for the help she gave with my first two papers at Steward. I am grateful to Dr. Dimitrios Psaltis and Dr. Feryal Ozel¨ for teaching me how to correctly and professionally approach a numerical coding project and for devoting all the time they did to the final part of my thesis. Without their help this thesis would have turned out differently. I do have many people to thank and acknowledge. One special person how- ever, my advisor Dr. George Rieke, does stands out from the crowd. He has, next to his vast amount of duties, somehow always found time to advise me. He always gave just the right amount of a push to get me going and always took interest in my personal problems. He is someone who genuinely cares how his students are doing. He always has and always will inspire me. Last, but not least, I thank all my friends who have been part of my life and supported me over the years. Zolt´an Makai, Suresh Sivanandam, Dennis Just, Alan Cooney and many others, thank you for all the fun times! And thank you, my best friend, my dear wife, Bori, for everything, for your support, your under- standing and all the joy I have gotten over the years. You make all this work and invested time have a meaning. Thank you. 5 DEDICATION I dedicate this thesis to my past, my present and my future. My past being my grandparents, who have all taught me so many valuable lessons in life and how to be a good person. They will always be an example to follow. My present being my mother, Ir´en, my father, Vilmos, my sister, Judit and my wife, Bori. You have been with me throughout the struggles and the joyous moments. You have encouraged me and given me goals to reach. And my future being our little baby, whom I don’t even know yet, but cannot wait to see in February. You and Mommy are the single reason this is all worth doing. 6 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ................................ 9 LIST OF TABLES ................................. 11 ABSTRACT .................................... 12 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION .......................... 14 1.1 Motivation................................. 14 1.2 Extrasolarplanets............................. 15 1.3 Starandplanetformation . 18 1.4 Circumstellardebrisdisks . 24 1.5 Thesolarsystem’sdebrisdisk . 26 1.6 Outlineofthethesis............................ 27 CHAPTER 2 FALSE SIGNS OF DEBRIS DISKS .................. 29 2.1 Introduction ................................ 29 2.2 ObservationsandDataReduction . 32 2.3 TheBowShockModel .......................... 37 2.3.1 Physicaldescriptionofthemodel . 38 2.3.2 ModelGeometryandParameters. 40 2.3.3 Results............................... 42 2.4 Discussion ................................. 50 2.4.1 BowShockModelResults . 50 2.4.2 ISMInteractions ......................... 52 2.4.3 Implications for Diffusion/Accretion Model of λ Bo¨otis Phe- nomenon.............................. 54 2.5 Summary.................................. 55 CHAPTER 3 DEBRIS DISK STUDY OF PRAESEPE ................ 57 3.1 Introduction ................................ 58 3.2 Observations, data reduction, and photometry . .... 61 3.3 Catalogsurveysandthefinalsample. 64 3.4 Results ................................... 74 3.4.1 Color-colorselection . 74 3.4.2 TheSEDfitselection . 81 3.4.3 Praesepewhitedwarfs. 81 3.4.4 DebrisDiskCandidates . 81 3.5 Discussion ................................. 84 3.5.1 Calulatingerrorsondebrisdiskfractions . .. 85 3.5.2 The decay of the debris disk fraction in early-type stars... 86 3.5.3 The decay of the debris disk fraction for solar-type stars .. 89 7 TABLE OF CONTENTS — Continued 3.5.4 Evolutionary differences between the debris disks around early-andsolar-typestars . 92 3.5.5 The results in context with the Late Heavy Bombardment . 95 3.6 Summary.................................. 97 CHAPTER 4 MODELING COLLISIONAL CASCADES IN DEBRIS DISKS .... 102 4.1 Introduction ................................102 4.2 The physical and numerical challenges of modeling debrisdisks . 105 4.2.1 Collisionaloutcomes . 110 4.2.2 Incorporating the complete redistribution integral ...... 112 4.2.3 Theeffectofradiationforces . 112 4.3 Thecollisionalmodel. 113 4.3.1 Theevolutionequation . 114 4.3.2 Thecollisionalterm . 118 4.3.3 Collisionoutcomes . 120 4.3.4 The initial distribution and fiducial parameters . 125 4.4 SimplifiedDynamics . 125 4.4.1 Collisionalvelocities . 128 4.4.2 Reduced collisional probabilities of β critical particles . 129 4.4.3 Reduced collisional probabilities of the largest particles . 131 4.5 Results ...................................132 4.5.1 ComparisontoTh´ebaultetal.(2003) . 133 4.5.2 Comparison to L¨ohne et al. (2008) and Wyatt et al. (2011) . 137 4.6 Conclusions ................................145 CHAPTER 5 STEEP DUST-SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS ................ 146 5.1 Introduction ................................146 5.2 Numericalmodeling . 147 5.2.1 Evolutionofthereferencemodel . 148 5.2.2 The dependence of the steady-state distribution function on thecollisionparameters . 152 5.2.3 The dependence of the steady-state distribution function on systemvariables . .. .. .. .. .. .. 156 5.2.4 The dependence of the steady-state distribution function on numericalparameters . 157 5.2.5 Thetimetoreachsteady-state. 158 5.2.6 Therobustnessofthesolution . 159 5.3 SyntheticSpectra ............................
Recommended publications
  • Messier Objects
    Messier Objects From the Stocker Astroscience Center at Florida International University Miami Florida The Messier Project Main contributors: • Daniel Puentes • Steven Revesz • Bobby Martinez Charles Messier • Gabriel Salazar • Riya Gandhi • Dr. James Webb – Director, Stocker Astroscience center • All images reduced and combined using MIRA image processing software. (Mirametrics) What are Messier Objects? • Messier objects are a list of astronomical sources compiled by Charles Messier, an 18th and early 19th century astronomer. He created a list of distracting objects to avoid while comet hunting. This list now contains over 110 objects, many of which are the most famous astronomical bodies known. The list contains planetary nebula, star clusters, and other galaxies. - Bobby Martinez The Telescope The telescope used to take these images is an Astronomical Consultants and Equipment (ACE) 24- inch (0.61-meter) Ritchey-Chretien reflecting telescope. It has a focal ratio of F6.2 and is supported on a structure independent of the building that houses it. It is equipped with a Finger Lakes 1kx1k CCD camera cooled to -30o C at the Cassegrain focus. It is equipped with dual filter wheels, the first containing UBVRI scientific filters and the second RGBL color filters. Messier 1 Found 6,500 light years away in the constellation of Taurus, the Crab Nebula (known as M1) is a supernova remnant. The original supernova that formed the crab nebula was observed by Chinese, Japanese and Arab astronomers in 1054 AD as an incredibly bright “Guest star” which was visible for over twenty-two months. The supernova that produced the Crab Nebula is thought to have been an evolved star roughly ten times more massive than the Sun.
    [Show full text]
  • Naming the Extrasolar Planets
    Naming the extrasolar planets W. Lyra Max Planck Institute for Astronomy, K¨onigstuhl 17, 69177, Heidelberg, Germany [email protected] Abstract and OGLE-TR-182 b, which does not help educators convey the message that these planets are quite similar to Jupiter. Extrasolar planets are not named and are referred to only In stark contrast, the sentence“planet Apollo is a gas giant by their assigned scientific designation. The reason given like Jupiter” is heavily - yet invisibly - coated with Coper- by the IAU to not name the planets is that it is consid- nicanism. ered impractical as planets are expected to be common. I One reason given by the IAU for not considering naming advance some reasons as to why this logic is flawed, and sug- the extrasolar planets is that it is a task deemed impractical. gest names for the 403 extrasolar planet candidates known One source is quoted as having said “if planets are found to as of Oct 2009. The names follow a scheme of association occur very frequently in the Universe, a system of individual with the constellation that the host star pertains to, and names for planets might well rapidly be found equally im- therefore are mostly drawn from Roman-Greek mythology. practicable as it is for stars, as planet discoveries progress.” Other mythologies may also be used given that a suitable 1. This leads to a second argument. It is indeed impractical association is established. to name all stars. But some stars are named nonetheless. In fact, all other classes of astronomical bodies are named.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Wavelength Modeling of the Spatially Resolved Debris Disk of HD 107146
    A&A 533, A132 (2011) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201015910 & c ESO 2011 Astrophysics Multi-wavelength modeling of the spatially resolved debris disk of HD 107146 S. Ertel1,S.Wolf1, S. Metchev2,G.Schneider3,J.M.Carpenter4,M.R.Meyer5, L. A. Hillenbrand4, and M. D. Silverstone6 1 Institut für Theoretische Physik und Astrophysik, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Leibnizstraße 15, 24098 Kiel, Germany e-mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Physics and Astronomy, State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY 11794-3800, USA 3 Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, 933 North Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA 4 Department of Astronomy, California Institute of Technology, 1200 East California Boulevard, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 5 Institute for Astronomy, ETH Zürich, Wolfgang-Pauli-Straße 27, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland 6 Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Alabama, 326 Gallalee, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0324, USA Received 12 October 2010 / Accepted 1 July 2011 ABSTRACT Aims. We aim to constrain the location, composition, and dynamical state of planetesimal populations and dust around the young, sun-like (G2 V) star HD 107146. Methods. We consider coronagraphic observations obtained with the Advanced Camera for Surveys (HST/ACS) onboard the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) in broad V (λc ≈ 0.6 μm) and broad I (λc ≈ 0.8 μm) filters, a resolved 1.3 mm map obtained with the Combined Array for Research in Millimeter-wave Astronomy (CARMA), Spitzer/IRS low resolution spectra in the range of 7.6 μm to 37.0 μm, and the spectral energy distribution (SED) of the object at wavelengths ranging from 3.5 μmto3.1 mm.
    [Show full text]
  • WASP Page 1 Hubble Eyes Aging Stars Science News, Vol. 148
    WASP Warren Astronomical Society Paper Volume 27, number 11 $1.00 for non-members November 1995 DATING THE COSMOS COMPUTER CHATTER ANNUAL HOLIDAY AWARDS Hubble eyes aging stars Larry F. Kalinowski Science News, Vol. 148, September 2,1995 submitted by Lorna Simmons Everyone knows you can't be older than your mother. But over the past year, observations with the Hubble Space Telescope and several other Comet DeVico has just passed perihelion in instruments seem to have contradicted this cardi- early October, so its beginning to fade from its maxi- nal rule. On the one hand, measurements of the mum brightness of 5.6. It was recovered in its seventy- speed at which the most distant galaxies are mov- four year orbit by independent comet observers Naka- ing from Earth suggest that the universe may be mura, Tanaka and Utsunomiya. It becomes a sixth no older than 8 billion to 12 billion years (SN: magnitude object on the night of the Macomb meeting, 10/8;94, p.232). On the other hand, astronomers October 19. Early reports say it has two tails. A morn- ing object, only, about fifteen degrees above the hori- estimate he ages of our galaxy's oldest stars at zon before twilight begins, it's easily observed as it 13 billion to 16 billion years. leaves Leo and enters the Ursa Major-Coma Berenices Now, new findings from Hubble may provide a area of the sky. However, it is quickly moving closer to step toward resolving this cosmic conundrum. the horizon and will become increasingly more difficult In viewing the globular cluster M4, the dense to observe during the rest of the month.
    [Show full text]
  • Correlations Between the Stellar, Planetary, and Debris Components of Exoplanet Systems Observed by Herschel⋆
    A&A 565, A15 (2014) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201323058 & c ESO 2014 Astrophysics Correlations between the stellar, planetary, and debris components of exoplanet systems observed by Herschel J. P. Marshall1,2, A. Moro-Martín3,4, C. Eiroa1, G. Kennedy5,A.Mora6, B. Sibthorpe7, J.-F. Lestrade8, J. Maldonado1,9, J. Sanz-Forcada10,M.C.Wyatt5,B.Matthews11,12,J.Horner2,13,14, B. Montesinos10,G.Bryden15, C. del Burgo16,J.S.Greaves17,R.J.Ivison18,19, G. Meeus1, G. Olofsson20, G. L. Pilbratt21, and G. J. White22,23 (Affiliations can be found after the references) Received 15 November 2013 / Accepted 6 March 2014 ABSTRACT Context. Stars form surrounded by gas- and dust-rich protoplanetary discs. Generally, these discs dissipate over a few (3–10) Myr, leaving a faint tenuous debris disc composed of second-generation dust produced by the attrition of larger bodies formed in the protoplanetary disc. Giant planets detected in radial velocity and transit surveys of main-sequence stars also form within the protoplanetary disc, whilst super-Earths now detectable may form once the gas has dissipated. Our own solar system, with its eight planets and two debris belts, is a prime example of an end state of this process. Aims. The Herschel DEBRIS, DUNES, and GT programmes observed 37 exoplanet host stars within 25 pc at 70, 100, and 160 μm with the sensitiv- ity to detect far-infrared excess emission at flux density levels only an order of magnitude greater than that of the solar system’s Edgeworth-Kuiper belt. Here we present an analysis of that sample, using it to more accurately determine the (possible) level of dust emission from these exoplanet host stars and thereafter determine the links between the various components of these exoplanetary systems through statistical analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:0705.4290V2 [Astro-Ph] 23 Aug 2007
    DRAFT VERSION NOVEMBER 11, 2018 Preprint typeset using LATEX style emulateapj v. 08/13/06 THE GEMINI DEEP PLANET SURVEY – GDPS∗ DAVID LAFRENIÈREA,RENÉ DOYONA , CHRISTIAN MAROISB ,DANIEL NADEAUA, BEN R. OPPENHEIMERC,PATRICK F. ROCHED , FRANÇOIS RIGAUTE, JAMES R. GRAHAMF ,RAY JAYAWARDHANAG,DOUG JOHNSTONEH,PAUL G. KALASF ,BRUCE MACINTOSHB, RENÉ RACINEA Draft version November 11, 2018 ABSTRACT We present the results of the Gemini Deep Planet Survey, a near-infrared adaptive optics search for giant planets and brown dwarfs around nearby young stars. The observations were obtained with the Altair adaptive optics system at the Gemini North telescope and angular differential imaging was used to suppress the speckle noise of the central star. Detection limits for the 85 stars observed are presented, along with a list of all faint point sources detected around them. Typically, the observations are sensitive to angular separations beyond 0.5′′ with 5σ contrast sensitivities in magnitude difference at 1.6 µm of 9.5 at 0.5′′, 12.9 at 1′′, 15.0 at 2′′, and 16.5 at 5′′. For the typical target of the survey, a 100 Myr old K0 star located 22 pc from the Sun, the observations are sensitive enough to detect planets more massive than 2 MJup with a projected separation in the range 40–200 AU. Depending on the age, spectral type, and distance of the target stars, the detection limit can be as low as 1 MJup. Second epoch observations of 48 stars with candidates (out of 54) have confirmed that all candidates are∼ unrelated background stars. A detailed statistical analysis of the survey results, yielding upper limits on the fractions of stars with giant planet or low mass brown dwarf companions, is presented.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Sky & Telescope
    TRANSIT MYSTERY Strange sights BINOCULAR TOUR Dive deep into SHOOT THE MOON Take amazing as Mercury crosses the Sun p28 Virgo’s endless pool of galaxies p56 lunar images with your smartphone p38 TEST REPORT Meade’s 25-cm LX600-ACF P62 THE ESSENTIAL MAGAZINE OF ASTRONOMY Lasers and advanced optics are transforming astronomy p20 HOW TO BUY THE RIGHT ASTRO CAMERA p32 p14 ISSUE 93 MAPPING THE BIG BANG’S COSMIC ECHOES $9.50 NZ$9.50 INC GST LPI-GLPI-G LUNAR,LUNAR, PLANETARYPLANETARY IMAGERIMAGER ANDAND GUIDERGUIDER ASTROPHOTOGRAPHY MADE EASY. Let the LPI-G unleash the inner astrophotographer in you. With our solar, lunar and planetary guide camera, experience the universe on a whole new level. 0Image Sensor:'+(* C O LOR 0 Pixel Size / &#*('+ 0Frames per second/Resolution• / • / 0 Image Format: #,+$)!&))'!,# .# 0 Shutter%,*('#(%%#'!"-,,* 0Interface: 0Driver: ASCOM compatible 0GuiderPort: 0Color or Monochrome Models (&#'!-,-&' FEATURED DEALERS: MeadeTelescopes Adelaide Optical Centre | www.adelaideoptical.com.au MeadeInstrument The Binocular and Telescope Shop | www.bintel.com.au MeadeInstruments www.meade.com Sirius Optics | www.sirius-optics.com.au The device to free you from your handbox. With the Stella adapter, you can wirelessly control your GoTo Meade telescope at a distance without being limited by cord length. Paired with our new planetarium app, *StellaAccess, astronomers now have a graphical interface for navigating the night sky. STELLA WI-FI ADAPTER / $#)'$!!+#!+ #$#)'#)$##)$#'&*' / (!-')-$*')!($%)$$+' "!!$#$)(,#%',).( StellaAccess app. Available for use on both phones and tablets. /'$+((()$!'%!#)'*")($'!$)##!'##"$'$*) stars, planets, celestial bodies and more /$,'-),',### -' ($),' /,,,$"$')*!!!()$$"%)!)!($%( STELLA is controlled with Meade’s planetarium app, StellaAccess. Available for purchase for both iOS S and Android systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Monthly Newsletter of the Durban Centre - March 2018
    Page 1 Monthly Newsletter of the Durban Centre - March 2018 Page 2 Table of Contents Chairman’s Chatter …...…………………….……….………..….…… 3 Andrew Gray …………………………………………...………………. 5 The Hyades Star Cluster …...………………………….…….……….. 6 At the Eye Piece …………………………………………….….…….... 9 The Cover Image - Antennae Nebula …….……………………….. 11 Galaxy - Part 2 ….………………………………..………………….... 13 Self-Taught Astronomer …………………………………..………… 21 The Month Ahead …..…………………...….…….……………..…… 24 Minutes of the Previous Meeting …………………………….……. 25 Public Viewing Roster …………………………….……….…..……. 26 Pre-loved Telescope Equipment …………………………...……… 28 ASSA Symposium 2018 ………………………...……….…......…… 29 Member Submissions Disclaimer: The views expressed in ‘nDaba are solely those of the writer and are not necessarily the views of the Durban Centre, nor the Editor. All images and content is the work of the respective copyright owner Page 3 Chairman’s Chatter By Mike Hadlow Dear Members, The third month of the year is upon us and already the viewing conditions have been more favourable over the last few nights. Let’s hope it continues and we have clear skies and good viewing for the next five or six months. Our February meeting was well attended, with our main speaker being Dr Matt Hilton from the Astrophysics and Cosmology Research Unit at UKZN who gave us an excellent presentation on gravity waves. We really have to be thankful to Dr Hilton from ACRU UKZN for giving us his time to give us presentations and hope that we can maintain our relationship with ACRU and that we can draw other speakers from his colleagues and other research students! Thanks must also go to Debbie Abel and Piet Strauss for their monthly presentations on NASA and the sky for the following month, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Optical Counterparts of ROSAT X-Ray Sources in Two Selected Fields at Low
    Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. sbg˙comsge˙ed c ESO 2018 October 16, 2018 Optical counterparts of ROSAT X-ray sources in two selected fields at low vs. high Galactic latitudes J. Greiner1, G.A. Richter2 1 Max-Planck-Institut f¨ur extraterrestrische Physik, 85740 Garching, Germany 2 Sternwarte Sonneberg, 96515 Sonneberg, Germany Received 14 October 2013 / Accepted 12 August 2014 ABSTRACT Context. The optical identification of large number of X-ray sources such as those from the ROSAT All-Sky Survey is challenging with conventional spectroscopic follow-up observations. Aims. We investigate two ROSAT All-Sky Survey fields of size 10◦× 10◦ each, one at galactic latitude b = 83◦ (26 Com), the other at b = –5◦ (γ Sge), in order to optically identify the majority of sources. Methods. We used optical variability, among other more standard methods, as a means of identifying a large number of ROSAT All- Sky Survey sources. All objects fainter than about 12 mag and brighter than about 17 mag, in or near the error circle of the ROSAT positions, were tested for optical variability on hundreds of archival plates of the Sonneberg field patrol. Results. The present paper contains probable optical identifications of altogether 256 of the 370 ROSAT sources analysed. In partic- ular, we found 126 AGN (some of them may be misclassified CVs), 17 likely clusters of galaxies, 16 eruptive double stars (mostly CVs), 43 chromospherically active stars, 65 stars brighter than about 13 mag, 7 UV Cet stars, 3 semiregular resp. slow irregular variable stars of late spectral type, 2 DA white dwarfs, 1 Am star, 1 supernova remnant and 1 planetary nebula.
    [Show full text]
  • Biennial Report 2006 2007 Published in Spain by the Isaac Newton Group of Telescopes (ING) ISSN 1575–8966 Legal License: TF–1142 /99
    I SAAC N EWTON G ROUP OF T ELESCOPES Biennial Report 2006 2007 Published in Spain by the Isaac Newton Group of Telescopes (ING) ISSN 1575–8966 Legal license: TF–1142 /99 Apartado de correos, 321 E-38700 Santa Cruz de La Palma; Canary Islands; Spain Tel: +34 922 425 400 Fax: +34 922 425 401 URL: http://www.ing.iac.es/ Editor and designer: Javier Méndez ([email protected]) Printing: Gráficas Sabater. Tel: +34 922 623 555 Front cover: The Milky Way from the site of the William Herschel Telescope. Credit: Nik Szymanek. Inset: Photograph of the WHT at sunset. Credit: Nik Szymanek. Other picture credits: Nik Szymanek (WHT, p. 4; INT, p. 4; JKT, p. 4; ING, p. 5); Jens Moser (WHT, back; INT, back); Nik Szymanek (JKT, back). The ING Biennial Report is available online at http://www.ing.iac.es/PR/AR/. ISAAC NEWTON GROUP OF TELESCOPES Biennial Report of the STFC-NWO-IAC ING Board 2006 – 2007 ISAAC NEWTON GROUP William Herschel Telescope Isaac Newton Telescope Jacobus Kapteyn Telescope 4 • ING BIENNIAL R EPORT 2006–2007 OF TELESCOPES The Isaac Newton Group of Telescopes (ING) consists of the 4.2- metre William Herschel Telescope (WHT), the 2.5-metre Isaac Newton Telescope (INT) and the 1.0-metre Jacobus Kapteyn Telescope (JKT). The ING is located 2350 metres above sea level at the Observatorio del Roque de los Muchachos (ORM) on the island of La Palma, Canary Islands, Spain. The WHT is the largest telescope of its kind in Western Europe. The construction, operation, and development of the ING telescopes are the result of a collaboration between the United Kingdom, The Netherlands and Spain.
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey of Active Galaxies at Tev Photon Energies with the HAWC Gamma-Ray Observatory
    Draft version September 22, 2020 Typeset using LATEX default style in AASTeX63 A survey of active galaxies at TeV photon energies with the HAWC gamma-ray observatory A. Albert,1 C. Alvarez,2 J.R. Angeles Camacho,3 J.C. Arteaga-Velazquez,´ 4 K.P. Arunbabu,5 D. Avila Rojas,3 H.A. Ayala Solares,6 V. Baghmanyan,7 E. Belmont-Moreno,3 S.Y. BenZvi,8 C. Brisbois,9 K.S. Caballero-Mora,2 T. Capistran´ ,10 A. Carraminana~ ,10 S. Casanova,7 U. Cotti,4 J. Cotzomi,11 S. Coutino~ de Leon´ ,10 E. De la Fuente,12 B.L. Dingus,1 M.A. DuVernois,13 M. Durocher,1 J.C. D´ıaz-Velez´ ,12 K. Engel,9 C. Espinoza,3 K.L. Fan,9 M. Fernandez´ Alonso,6 H. Fleischhack,14 N. Fraija,15 A. Galvan-G´ amez,´ 15 D. Garc´ıa,3 J.A. Garc´ıa-Gonzalez´ ,3 F. Garfias,15 M.M. Gonzalez´ ,15 J.A. Goodman,9 J.P. Harding,1 S. Hernandez´ ,3 B. Hona,14 D. Huang,14 F. Hueyotl-Zahuantitla,2 P. Huntemeyer,¨ 14 A. Iriarte,15 A. Jardin-Blicq,16, 17, 18 V. Joshi,19 D. Kieda,20 G.J. Kunde,1 A. Lara,5 W.H. Lee,15 H. Leon´ Vargas,3 J.T. Linnemann,21 A.L. Longinotti,10 G. Luis-Raya,22 J. Lundeen,21 K. Malone,1 O. Mart´ınez,11 I. Martinez-Castellanos,9 J. Mart´ınez-Castro,23 J.A. Matthews,24 P. Miranda-Romagnoli,25 J.A. Morales-Soto,4 E. Moreno,11 M.
    [Show full text]
  • Astronomy 2009 Index
    Astronomy Magazine 2009 Index Subject Index 1RXS J160929.1-210524 (star), 1:24 4C 60.07 (galaxy pair), 2:24 6dFGS (Six Degree Field Galaxy Survey), 8:18 21-centimeter (neutral hydrogen) tomography, 12:10 93 Minerva (asteroid), 12:18 2008 TC3 (asteroid), 1:24 2009 FH (asteroid), 7:19 A Abell 21 (Medusa Nebula), 3:70 Abell 1656 (Coma galaxy cluster), 3:8–9, 6:16 Allen Telescope Array (ATA) radio telescope, 12:10 ALMA (Atacama Large Millimeter/sub-millimeter Array), 4:21, 9:19 Alpha (α) Canis Majoris (Sirius) (star), 2:68, 10:77 Alpha (α) Orionis (star). See Betelgeuse (Alpha [α] Orionis) (star) Alpha Centauri (star), 2:78 amateur astronomy, 10:18, 11:48–53, 12:19, 56 Andromeda Galaxy (M31) merging with Milky Way, 3:51 midpoint between Milky Way Galaxy and, 1:62–63 ultraviolet images of, 12:22 Antarctic Neumayer Station III, 6:19 Anthe (moon of Saturn), 1:21 Aperture Spherical Telescope (FAST), 4:24 APEX (Atacama Pathfinder Experiment) radio telescope, 3:19 Apollo missions, 8:19 AR11005 (sunspot group), 11:79 Arches Cluster, 10:22 Ares launch system, 1:37, 3:19, 9:19 Ariane 5 rocket, 4:21 Arianespace SA, 4:21 Armstrong, Neil A., 2:20 Arp 147 (galaxy pair), 2:20 Arp 194 (galaxy group), 8:21 art, cosmology-inspired, 5:10 ASPERA (Astroparticle European Research Area), 1:26 asteroids. See also names of specific asteroids binary, 1:32–33 close approach to Earth, 6:22, 7:19 collision with Jupiter, 11:20 collisions with Earth, 1:24 composition of, 10:55 discovery of, 5:21 effect of environment on surface of, 8:22 measuring distant, 6:23 moons orbiting,
    [Show full text]