DOCSLIB.ORG

MK Settlement Boundary Study (November 2017)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MK Settlement Boundary Study (November 2017) Milton Keynes Settlement Boundary Study November 2017 Milton Keynes Council Settlement Boundary Study – November 2017 Quality information Prepared by Checked by Approved by Jesse Honey – Associate David Carlisle - Associate Ben Castell Charlotte Simpson – Planning Consultant Shane Scollard – Planning Consultant Revision History Revision Revision date Details Authorized Name Position First Draft 15/09/2107 For client review Jesse Honey Associate Draft Final Report 31/10/2017 For client sign off David Carlisle Associate Final Report xx/xx/2017 Final report for Ben Castell Director publication Distribution List # Hard Copies PDF Required Association / Company Name 2 Milton Keynes Council Settlement Boundary Study – November 2017 Prepared for: Milton Keynes Council Saxon Court Offices 502 Avebury Boulevard Central Milton Keynes MK9 3HS Prepared by: Jesse Honey AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited Aldgate Tower, 2 Leman Street, London E1 8FA UK aecom.com © 2016 AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client Milton Keynes Council (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM. 3 Milton Keynes Council Settlement Boundary Study – November 2017 THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN FORMATTED FOR DOUBLE SIDED PRINTING . 4 Milton Keynes Council Settlement Boundary Study – November 2017 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 6 2. Methodology .................................................................................................................... 8 3. Proposed Settlement Boundaries for Plan:MK .............................................................. 13 4. Next Steps ..................................................................................................................... 26 Appendix- Settlement Boundary Mapping ............................................................................ 28 5 Milton Keynes Council Settlement Boundary Study – November 2017 1. Introduction 1.1 Milton Keynes Council (MKC / ‘the Council’) is in the process of preparing a new Local Plan, known as Plan:MK, for the period to 2031. Plan:MK will: Update previous plans by incorporating new national planning policy and guidance; Provide for development requirements up to 2031, in particular identifying land in the district which is suitable for meeting housing and employment need; Plan positively for development, including the provision of infrastructure and community facilities; Identify areas for protection, such as important areas for wildlife conservation and key heritage assets. 1.2 Plan:MK will eventually supersede and replace the adopted Core Strategy (2013) and Local Plan (2005). 1.3 This document supports Plan:MK by reviewing settlement boundaries across Milton Keynes Borough for the purposes of planning policy and development management. As such, it is part of the evidence base supporting Plan:MK but does not itself comprise a policy document. It is a snapshot in time (2017) and it will eventually be superseded in the future. Study Objectives 1.4 The review of settlement boundaries across Milton Keynes will act as an important tool in identifying the interface between 'settlements' and 'countryside' for development management purposes. This has the effect of: directing inappropriate development away from rural areas (in line with paragraph 55 of the National Planning Policy Framework)1; and supporting appropriate development and change within existing or proposed urban areas. 1 Available online at https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/6077/2116950.pdf. Note that otherwise, national policy does not address the specific issue of settlement boundaries, meaning that it falls to local authorities like Milton Keynes Council to determine what is an appropriate location for settlement boundaries based on relevant local evidence. 6 Milton Keynes Council Settlement Boundary Study – November 2017 1.5 Following the review of settlement boundaries, where an application falls into the definition of ‘countryside’ it will be covered by appropriate countryside policy and thus needs to demonstrate it is appropriate in a countryside location. 1.6 .Settlement boundaries in Milton Keynes Borough were last formally reviewed in 1995, meaning this review is necessary in order to take account of new development and consents for development that have taken place between then and now. At Moulsoe no settlement boundary had previously been defined, and this review proposes one for the first time. 1.7 Maps of all settlements showing the 1995 (existing) settlement boundaries, the changes made to those boundaries through the current process, and proposed new (2017) settlement boundaries are set out in the Appendix of this report. 7 Milton Keynes Council Settlement Boundary Study – November 2017 2. Methodology Basic criteria 2.1 To ensure that settlement boundaries are applied across Milton Keynes in a consistent and comprehensive way, criteria were set to inform how and where changes to the settlement boundaries across the Borough should be considered. These comprised the following: The 1995 settlement boundaries in the existing local plan being used as a starting point, with changes made to them only where evidence exists to support that change; The boundaries of Site Allocations within the emerging Plan:MK (none of which had been consented at the time of writing) and allocations within made neighbourhood plans; and Development consents for non-agricultural uses within or adjacent to existing built-up areas, both implemented and not implemented, affecting settlement boundaries between 1995 and present. 2.2 .The only exception to using the 1995 settlement boundaries as a starting point were at Moulsoe, which had no pre-existing boundary. 2.3 In addition to the above factors the approach included an analysis of mapping and building curtilages and built in verification stages with MKC and the Parish Councils. Development consents since 1995 2.4 The review of MKC’s online planning application search facility showed the boundaries of most (but not all) planning applications consented since the last settlement boundary review. Where a development had been consented but not implemented (i.e. permission was granted but no development resulted) the boundaries of the expired permission were nevertheless included within a revised settlement boundary because the principle of development in that location has been established. 2.5 It is also understood that an unspecified number of development consents exist between 1995 and the present day that pre-date the online planning application database, almost all dating from the years immediately following 1995. 2.6 In order to ensure these additional consents were also captured within the new settlement boundaries, comparisons were made between aerial imagery of development from the present day and the original mapping of settlement boundaries from 1995. This enabled a number of developments to be identified that, though 8 Milton Keynes Council Settlement Boundary Study – November 2017 given consent since the last settlement boundary review, do not (for whatever reason) appear in the online planning application database. 2.7 In order for a development consent to amend the existing settlement boundary, it had to pass two tests: Firstly, it had to comprise development of, or change of use to, a non- agricultural land use, using the planning use classes as set out in the Town and Country Planning (Use Classes) Order 1987 (as amended)2; and Secondly, the consent had to be directly adjacent to the existing settlement boundary. 2.8 So, for example, if twenty new dwellings (use class C3) had been consented adjacent to but outside the 1995 boundary of any settlement, the boundary was extended to recognise that the development now forms part of that urban area. However, if new farm buildings (use class sui generis and appropriate for the countryside policy area) had been consented adjacent to but outside the 1995 boundary of a settlement, the boundary remained unchanged. 2.9 Employing use classes allowed for a consistent approach to planning consents since 1995 to be taken across the Borough, and were divided into ‘non-agricultural’ and ‘agricultural’ uses as set out in Table 1. 2 For further information, see https://www.planningportal.co.uk/info/200130/common_projects/9/change_of_use 9 Milton Keynes Council Settlement Boundary Study – November 2017 Table 1: Division of planning use classes into ‘non-agricultural’ and ‘agricultural’ uses for the purposes of the Milton Keynes Settlement Boundary Review Planning use class Use class description Result if post-1995 consent adjacent to but outside existing settlement boundary A Shops, professional and Boundary amended to financial services, include new consent restaurants and cafes, drinking establishments and hot food takeaways B Business, general Boundary amended to industrial, storage and include new consent distribution C Dwellings
Load more

Recommended publications
  • For Your Prayers
    For your prayers: Willen membership Street Cycle of Prayer Patricia Clark Beaufort Drive Betty Colley Bec Lane Gail Constant Bells Meadow Pamela (Pip) Coyne Bentall Close The Sick: Stuart Bowden, Malcolm Field, Gordon Field, Ena Fisher, Eddie Flitney, Terance Gayle, Mary Hartwell, Nick Read, Barbara Saunders, Kirstie Wayland, Joyce Whiffen, Fiona Wright RIP: Eileen Allen World Prayers: For all who are suffering in Aleppo, Syria Prayer cycle: view here - http://www.missionpartnership.org.uk Other notices Themes for Prayer: Areas of Milton Keynes Villages Media Stony Stratford Hanslope Charities and agencies Stantonbury (North MK) Sherrington Hospitals Woughton (South-Central MK) Filgrave Transport Bletchley Little Brickhill Christian Foundation Wolverton Haversham Hunger Fenny Stratford Gayhurst Those in Debt Water Eaton Olney HAVE FUN WITH HEBREW!: God spoke to Moses in Hebrew so you’ll need it when you get to heaven! Save the language classes there by starting to learn now. Seriously, an opportunity to get into the text of the Old Testament / Hebrew Bible. Aimed at absolute beginners. Starting on Tuesday September 20th at the Priory at Willen (The Well) and running for 8 weeks, sessions start at noon and finish at 2pm. Bring your lunch and we will provide the drinks. A small donation is asked for. Classes will be led by Peter Ballantine, recently retired, who has Hebrew up to Master’s level. If you are interested, contact him on 07876 797507. Saturday 10th September is the annual Ride and Stride Day for the Bucks Historic Churches fund. Willen Church is also going to be open as part of the Heritage Open Days which is focussing this year on Milton Keynes.
    [Show full text]
  • Little Brickhill Snippets for February 2021 – Cllr David Hopkins / Cllr Victoria Hopkins/Cllr Alice Jenkins
    Little Brickhill Snippets for February 2021 – Cllr David Hopkins / Cllr Victoria Hopkins/Cllr Alice Jenkins LITTLE BRICKHILL Watling Street 08/02/21 09/04/21 TRAFFIC SIGNALS 24 hours 24 hours (Two-Way) LITTLE BRICKHILL Watling Street 08/02/21 09/04/21 TRAFFIC SIGNALS 24 hours 24 hours (Two-Way) LITTLE BRICKHILL FOOTPATH 16 18/02/21 18/08/21 FOOTPATH LITTLE BRICKHILL 24 Hours 24 Hours CLOSURE (Public Right Of Way) LITTLE BRICKHILL FOOTPATH 17 18/02/21 18/08/21 FOOTPATH LITTLE BRICKHILL 24 Hours 24 Hours CLOSURE (Public Right Of Way) The Highways Register of Roadworks and Events in Milton Keynes 1 South East Milton Keynes Cllr Peter Marland (Leader of MK Council) luanched the draft SPD (on 26 January) that will go out for 10 weeks consultation. The consultation materials will be accessed via the Development Plans Teams website from the 8th Feb. We will be using the SEMK email address for responses [email protected] In terms of the consultation, we are going to go for 10 weeks, Monday to Monday, so it will start on the 8th of February and finish on the 19th of April. If you are able to confirm what plans the Town and Parish Councils require for their newsletters and what format they want the images in that would be useful. As a starting point I would suggest the Location Plan, The Redline Plan, The Concept Plan, and all the Plans from the Development Framework Section? Contact: Matthew Clarke - Principal Urban Designer • : 01908 254766 • :[email protected]: [email protected] • :Department
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Electorate Proforma 11Oct2012
    Electoral data 2012 2018 Using this sheet: Number of councillors: 51 51 Fill in the cells for each polling district. Please make sure that the names of each parish, parish ward and unitary ward are Overall electorate: 178,504 190,468 correct and consistant. Check your data in the cells to the right. Average electorate per cllr: 3,500 3,735 Polling Electorate Electorate Number of Electorate Variance Electorate Description of area Parish Parish ward Unitary ward Name of unitary ward Variance 2018 district 2012 2018 cllrs per ward 2012 2012 2018 Bletchley & Fenny 3 10,385 -1% 11,373 2% Stratford Bradwell 3 9,048 -14% 8,658 -23% Campbell Park 3 10,658 2% 10,865 -3% Danesborough 1 3,684 5% 4,581 23% Denbigh 2 5,953 -15% 5,768 -23% Eaton Manor 2 5,976 -15% 6,661 -11% AA Church Green West Bletchley Church Green Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 1872 2,032 Emerson Valley 3 12,269 17% 14,527 30% AB Denbigh Saints West Bletchley Saints Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 1292 1,297 Furzton 2 6,511 -7% 6,378 -15% AC Denbigh Poets West Bletchley Poets Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 1334 1,338 Hanslope Park 1 4,139 18% 4,992 34% AD Central Bletchley Bletchley & Fenny Stratford Central Bletchley Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 2361 2,367 Linford North 2 6,700 -4% 6,371 -15% AE Simpson Simpson & Ashland Simpson Village Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 495 497 Linford South 2 7,067 1% 7,635 2% AF Fenny Stratford Bletchley & Fenny Stratford Fenny Stratford Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 1747 2,181 Loughton Park 3 12,577 20% 14,136 26% AG Granby Bletchley & Fenny Stratford Granby Bletchley
    [Show full text]
  • BRITISH BRICK SOCIETY Summer Meeting Saturday 25 July 2015 the FRINGES of MILTON KEYNES BRICKWORKS, RAILWAY STATIONS, CHURCHES Buildings Notes
    BRITISH BRICK SOCIETY Summer Meeting Saturday 25 July 2015 THE FRINGES OF MILTON KEYNES BRICKWORKS, RAILWAY STATIONS, CHURCHES Buildings Notes INTRODUCTION Timgad in a green field: the City of Milton Keynes is an artificial creation, no less than the Roman city on the edge of the desert in Algeria. Some of us remember the land between the M1 to the east and Watling Street (or the West Coast main railway line) to the west as green fields bisected by pleasant country roads and having isolated villages within them. The writer did the journey from Luton to Northampton very frequently in the late 1960s and the first seven years of the 1970s. Along the fringes of the new city the village centres and their eighteenth-century churches remain: Fenny Stratford, Bow Brickhill (not taken in by the new city), Willen, Great Linford. These notes will concentrate on these villages but will also record buildings in two of the old market towns ― Bletchley and Stony Stratford ― now subsumed within the new metropolis. The notes concentrate on three aspects of brick activity: brickworks and their surviving structure, railways and the buildings erected for them, and a group of churches, rebuilt in brick in the early eighteenth century. BRICKWORKS Beside the railway line from Oxford to Cambridge were many brickyards; this is particularly so in the Buckinghamshire section from north of Marsh Gibbon to Woburn Sands. The yards producing the self-combusting Flettons in the late nineteenth century and through to the end of the twentieth century are well-known. But the brickmaking industry around the fringes of Milton Keynes is much older than the last decades of the nineteenth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Lock-Up Retail Unit with Outbuilding Leasehold
    01908 611408 www.stimpsonseves.co.uk 2, Watling Street, Little Brickhill, Milton Keynes, MK17 9LY LEASEHOLD LOCK-UP RETAIL UNIT WITH OUTBUILDING Location The village of Little Brickhill is situated at the southern edge of the Borough of Milton Keynes, approximately 3.5 miles south east of Bletchley, 8 miles west of Flitwick and 9.5 miles north of Dunstable. It is conveniently located moments from the A5 and Leighton Buzzard Bypass, providing easy access to nearby towns. Description Accommodation A well presented ground floor lock-up retail unit Net internal area: with wooden floor, spotlights and wall-mounted modern electric heaters. Benefits from a large Retail area: 157.3 sq ft (14.61 sq m) kitchen for a unit of this size, with tiled floor, Kitchen: 79.7 sq ft (7.41 sq m) modern kitchen units and space for large appliances. Total: 237 sq ft (22.02 sq m) WC with hand basin and cubicle shower. To the rear is a concrete-built outbuilding with lighting and Outbuilding: 125.6 sq ft (11.67 sq m) electrical sockets. The property was previously occupied for A1 use, but could also be suitable for A2, office, beauty or clinic uses, subject to the necessary planning consents being obtained. 91a High Street, Newport Pagnell, Milton Keynes, MK16 8EN 01908 611408 01908 611408 www.stimpsonseves.co.uk 2, Watling Street, Little Brickhill, Milton Keynes, MK17 9LY Terms and Tenure The premises are available by way of a new FRI lease on flexible terms to be agreed. Rent Leasehold £417.00 Per Month Rates Rateable Value £1,600 The rates payable may be affected by transitional arrangements.
    [Show full text]
  • Ounded Orners 0˚
    X5 to Oxford X6 to Northampton 33 33A to Northampton via Hanslope Stony 6 Haversham Stratford X60 to Aylesbury Stratford Road 33 Wolverton Rd 33A 1 2 14 Poets 301 18 Estate Wolverton 7 23 Redhouse New 6 Church St Oakridge Park 14 Bradwell Newport Park Newport Wolverton 21 to Olney & Lavendon London Greenleys Road 23 21 Pagnell Road 23 5 1 21 24 25 Market Hill 23 Windsor 33 24 24 Street 25 301 Fullers 6 33A Blue 7 23 Great Marsh 1 25 18 2 C10 North Slade 14 Bridge 33 33A 7 Linford Drive 2 6 1 Green Crawley Stacey Bradville Stantonbury Park C10 C10 to Bedford via Craneld 5 Giard Blakelands Tickford End Kiln Bushes Bancroft 1 1 2 301 Hodge 33 Park Fairelds Farm Lea 6 33A 23 25 24 24 2 25 X5 5 C10 X6 7 21 Two Mile 33 33A 6 Linford Wood X5 to Cambridge via Bedford X60 18 Tongwell Ash 14 Pennyland Bolbeck 24 301 301 301 Bradwell Heelands 23 Neath Hill 24 1 Park C10 25 X5 Great 25 Whitehouse Holm Bradwell Conniburrow Downs 2 28 18 Barn Downhead Willen 301 Common 28 Loughton Park 1 Lovat 28 Lodge 2 7 Fields C10 24 21 300 300 25 2 2 Crownhill X5 Moulsoe 7 Central X5 X5 C1 C11 to Bedford via Craneld Grange Loughton Campbell C1 C11 Farm 28 Milton Rounded Campbell Park Fox Milne Shenley 24 24 25 Keynes Park 8 MK Coachway Route Frequency Corners Church End 25 Park and Ride Number Route every 28 7 Loughton Shenley 8 28 28 8 Middleton 1 Newton Leys - Bletchley - Central Milton Keynes - Newport Pagnell 30 mins Wood 50 5 Woolstone 24 1 150 6 28 4 Broughton Grange Farm - CMK - Willen - Redhouse Park - Newport Pagnell 20 mins 8 Knowlhill 8 25 2 Oldbrook
    [Show full text]
  • Details of Decisions Made on Planning Applications Week Beginning 7/5/2007
    Details of decisions made on planning applications week beginning 7/5/2007 07/00535/FUL Type: Delegated INSTALLATION OF ATM, ANTI RAM-RAID Decision BOLLARDS AND ASSOCIATED WORKS Bletchley And Team: South At: Tesco Stores Ltd Watling Street Fenny Fenny Stratford Stratford Bletchley Milton Keynes MK1 TC 1DD Decision date: 08/05/2007 For: Tesco Stores Decision: Application Permitted ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 07/00557/TCA Type: Delegated NOTIFICATION TO FELL A SYCAMORE TREE, Decision COPPICING OF A WILLOW TREE AND REDUCTION IN HEIGHT TO APPROX EIGHT FEET OF A HOLLY TREE Broughton / MK Team: Central At: Village Garden Broughton Road Milton Village PC Keynes Village Milton Keynes Decision date: 08/05/2007 For: Broughton And Milton Keynes Village Parish Council Decision: No Objection to Works to Tree in CA ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 07/00560/FUL Type: Delegated ERECTION OF CONSERVATORY Decision Broughton / MK Team: Central At: The Barn Home Farm Broughton Road Village PC Milton Keynes Village Milton Keynes MK10 9AJ Decision date: 09/05/2007 For: Mr And Mrs Brighton Decision: Application Permitted ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 07/00530/FUL Type: Delegated RESTORATION OF THREE COTTAGES Decision INCLUDING THE DEMOLITION AND REBUILDING OF A TWO STOREY REAR EXTENSION Calverton
    [Show full text]
  • Little Brickhill
    Little Brickhill Buckinghamshire Historic Towns Assessment Report Warren Farmhouse, Little Brickhill The Buckinghamshire Historic Towns Project was carried out between 2008 and 2012 by Buckinghamshire County Council with the sponsorship of English Heritage and the support of Milton Keynes Council and Buckinghamshire District Councils © Buckinghamshire County Council and English Heritage 2012 Report produced by David Green All the mapping contained in this report is based upon the Ordnance Survey mapping with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationary Office © Crown copyright. All rights reserved 100021529 (2012) All historic mapping contained in this report © Intermap Technologies Ltd All Historic Photographs are reproduced courtesy of the Centre for Buckinghamshire Studies unless otherwise stated. Copies of this report and further information can be obtained from: Buckinghamshire County Council Planning Advisory and Compliance Service, Place Service, Buckinghamshire County Council County Hall Aylesbury Bucks HP20 1UY Tel: 01296 382656 Email: [email protected] Summary .................................................................................................................................................. 5 I DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................................... 8 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 8
    [Show full text]
  • ED222 Aylesbury Vale Local Plan
    Heritage Appraisal Aylesbury Vale District Council July 2019 Heritage Appraisal Quality information Prepared by Checked by Approved by Katerina Koukouthaki Gillian Scott Mark Fessey Built Heritage Consultant Principal Heritage Consultant Associate Director Orlando Prestidge Andy Mayes, Dr. Steven Smith Senior Archaeological Consultant Associate Director, Heritage Technical Director Revision history Revision Revision date Details Authorized Name Position Distribution list # Hard Copies PDF Required Association / Company Name AECOM Heritage Appraisal Prepared for: Aylesbury Vale District Council Prepared by: Katerina Koukouthaki Built Heritage Consultant E: [email protected] M: +44-(0)7825-709-036 Orlando Prestidge Senior Archaeological Consultant E: [email protected] M: +-44-(0)-778-559-2713 AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited The Colmore Building Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT United Kingdom © 2019 AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM.
    [Show full text]
  • Milton Keynes Councillors
    LIST OF CONSULTEES A copy of the Draft Telecommunications Systems Policy document was forwarded to each of the following: MILTON KEYNES COUNCILLORS Paul Bartlett (Stony Stratford) Jan Lloyd (Eaton Manor) Brian Barton (Bradwell) Nigel Long (Woughton) Kenneth Beeley (Fenny Stratford) Graham Mabbutt (Olney) Robert Benning (Linford North) Douglas McCall (Newport Pagnell Roger Bristow (Furzton) South) Stuart Burke (Emerson Valley) Norman Miles (Wolverton) Stephen Clark (Olney) John Monk (Linford South) Martin Clarke (Bradwell) Brian Morsley (Stantonbury) George Conchie (Loughton Park) Derek Newcombe (Walton Park) Stephen Coventry (Woughton) Ian Nuttall (Walton Park) Paul Day (Wolverton) Michael O’Sullivan (Loughton Park) Reginald Edwards (Eaton Manor) Michael Pendry (Stony Stratford) John Ellis (Ouse Valley) Alan Pugh (Linford North) John Fairweather (Campbell Park) Christopher Pym (Walton Park) Brian Gibbs (Loughton Park) Hilary Saunders (Wolverton) Grant Gillingham (Fenny Stratford) Patricia Seymour (Sherington) Bruce Hardwick (Newport Pagnell Valerie Squires (Whaddon) North) Paul Stanyer (Furzton) William Harnett (Denbigh) Wedgwood Swepston (Emerson Euan Henderson (Newport Pagnell Valley) North) Cec Tallack (Campbell Park) Irene Henderson (Newport Pagnell Bert Tapp (Hanslope Park) South) Christine Tilley (Linford South) David Hopkins (Danesborough) Camilla Turnbull (Whaddon) Janet Irons (Bradwell Abbey) Paul White (Danesborough) Harry Kilkenny (Stantonbury) Isobel Wilson (Campbell Park) Michael Legg (Denbigh) Kevin Wilson (Woughton) David
    [Show full text]
  • C O N T E N T S C O N T E N
    EDITION NUMBER TWENTY SIX WINTER 2005 THE NEWSLETTER OF SHENLEY BROOK END & TATTENHOE PARISH COUNCIL SHENLEY BROOK END • TATTENHOE • FURZTON • SHENLEY LODGE • EMERSON VALLEY • WESTCROFT • TATTENHOE PARK • KINGSMEAD THE PARISH NEWS IN COLOUR Look out for the Parish The response to our last issue being printed in colour was overwhelmingly favourable. Council’s new identity There were a few readers who had reservations about the extra cost. However, our biggest cost is for distribution, which remains the same. The Parish Council felt that the improved impact of colour photographs was worthwhile and it was unanimously agreed to use colour printing in all future issues. We hope that some advertisers will be prepared to pay a small premium to take advantage of our colour printing and help offset our costs. At this point, we would like to add that The Parish News is proving popular with advertisers and we are very close to the point where advertisements may have to be turned away. We are reluctant to reject revenue but increased advertising reduces editorial space and our primary purpose is to disseminate information to residents. Shenley Brook End & Tattenhoe Parish Council now has its very Unfortunately, increasing the number of pages is not a viable own logo. It’s use will make it easy to recognise our signs, option as the extra weight would incur a disproportionate increase literature and officers. in the distribution cost. Consequently, we have to make it clear that As well as being incorporated into the banner of The Parish News, advertising will be accepted on a first come, first served, basis.
    [Show full text]
  • Family Tree Maker
    Descendants of William Kinge William Kinge Joane ? b: 1600 in Holy Trinity, Coventry, Warks? b: 1600 in Holy Trinity, Coventry, Warks? d: Unknown in Holy Trinity, Coventry, m: Unknown in Holy Trinity, Coventry, Warks? Warks? d: Unknown in Holy Trinity, Coventry, Warks? Thomas Kinge Elizabeth ? b: 1629 in Holy Trinity, Coventry, Warks b: Unknown in Holy Trinity, Coventry, Warks d: Unknown in Holy Trinity, Coventry, m: Unknown in Holy Trinity, Coventry, Warks? Warks d: Unknown in Holy Trinity, Coventry, Warks? Thomas Kinge Judeth Newberry b: 1654 in Holy Trinity, Coventry, Warks b: 1655 in Holy Trinity, Coventry, Warks d: Unknown in Holy Trinity, Coventry, m: Apr 1679 in Holy Trinity, Coventry, Warks Warks? d: Unknown in Holy Trinity, Coventry, Warks? William King Elizabeth Whipham Richard King (poss twins) Mary King Another son? b: Apr 1680 in Holy Trinity, Coventry, Warks b: 1684 in Little Brickhill, Bucks b: Apr 1680 in Holy Trinity, Coventry, Warks b: Jul 1681 in Holy Trinity, Coventry, Warks b: Aug 1685 in St Michaels, Coventry, Warks d: Unknown in Little Brickhill, Bucks? m: Nov 1705 in Walton, Bucks d: Unknown in Holy Trinity, Coventry, d: Jul 1681 in St Michaels, Coventry, Warks d: Unknown in ? d: Unknown in Little Brickhill, Bucks? Warks? Samuel King Damarius Rutland John King Bartholomew King b: Jun 1708 in Bletchley, Bucks b: 1713 in Shenley Church End, Bucks, b: Feb 1719 in Little Brickhill, Bucks b: Mar 1720 in Little Brickhill, Bucks d: 1780 in Little Brickhill, Bucks, England England d: Unknown in ? d: Unknown in ? m: 1736
    [Show full text]