DOCSLIB.ORG

Peak Hour Congestion – 2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Peak Hour Congestion – 2016 TRAVEL INFORMATION Dial 1-800-452-9292 for travel assistance from a professional Texas travel counselor, including routing in Texas, emergency road condition information, and other travel services; or to register a comment or Peak Hour Congestion 2com0plaint abo1ut departm6ent operations.° 107°W 106°W 105°W 104°W 103°W 102°W 101°W 100°W 99°W 98°W 97°W 96°W 95°W Mi9s4so°Wuri 93°W y t i C T n e o o l s r i B a m e r o o y v i e B s a n u b e o i e o C m G y L B i u T t o y G o o o T NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS T T T T o C Texhoma 1655 l Booker RQ 3133 160 815 ay Ray 75 RQ UV PO to Pilot ¤£ Leonard n UV15 To Shattuck Roberts 3356 Texline Darrouzett RQ2450 Point RQ 2862 981 Follett ), RQ PO RQ1190 Lake PERRYTON E DALLAM Weston a Anna s Sanger t STRATFORD 1204 455 2164 F RQ PO RQ o r Celina k 2153 WISE RQ r T e 3524 r v RQ in Blue Ridge 1562 385 51 i £ NORTH CENTRAL i RQ ¤ PO t R y 121 15 LIPSCOMB 543 UV PO545 UV Gruver R 54 Aubrey 428 1385 PO Melissa y RQ i £ t ¤ 3163 PO v RQ i e n TEXAS COG i r SHERMAN LIPSCOMB r ¤£287 SPEARMAN RQ1173 T Krugerville RQ2931 RQ2933 36°N To Sedan tt RQ1461 36°N ne 1810 Krum 5 HUNT HANSFORD ¤£83 Ar RQ 730 77 UV 87 o PO ¤£ Prosper RQ1827 ¤£ T 380 377 424 OCHILTREE Higgins £ £ PO 2756 CAPITAL AREA ¤ 2622 ¤ 380 RQ 1569 DALHART DECATUR RQ DENTON Cross Roads ¤£ RQ Lincoln New Hope 75 RQ2194 Park PO 1377 3170 1515 288 y RQ RQ1478 RQ Stillhouse BA121 PO93 RQ1671 Cactus 81 RQ BA a MCKINNEY PO36 ¤£ w Sunray l Princeton 426 Oak Point l Hollow PO o RQ3481 Little River Ponder Little RQ2934 T RQ2478 Farmersville h Lake Academy 940 Shady t Lam PO River 2264 2449 720 Elm r 546 dian RQ PO o PO pas 436 Cana RQ Shores 1378 as 1670 PO N 3537 RQ Lowry 2484 RQ s RQ ay RQ a w Crossing 136 Corinth B Hackberry l l l l 2670 UV L T Frisco To RQ RQ3259 PO423 a Fairview RQ3364 L D LUBBOCK 1830 2181 Lakewood Village n 2786 RQ r RQ ROBERTS DISH RQ bu 485 CANADIAN ), Lake ay PO 54 R Riv ¤£ Hickory Creek m 2657 er 1123 HUTCHINSON Anton Abernath3y69 Dallas Lewisville Sa Allen RQ BELL Salado RQ Rogers BA Corral Argyle 2170 963 2184 597 597 Copper Lake RQ 547 PO RQ DUMAS PO PO RQ1384 Northlake City 407 RQ3286 UV78 PO L 60 168 PO Canyon The Colony 1778 a ¤£ PO Lucas RQ 2268 m 2269 HARTLEY New Justin Highland Josephine RQ2843 RQ p RQ STINNETT To Roll 982 6 a 190 HEMPHILL Fairview Village COLLIN PO PO s ¤£ 1264 Boyd a MOORE RQ 2902 DENTON Saint 2340 195 s 179 RQ Bartonville Double RQ UV PO RQ2123 UV114 Parker Paul Lavon Lake N Holland Oak Lewisville Nevada or 308 437 70 RQ1171 th BA RQ2115 PO Buckholts UV 1527 Aurora RQ Rhome Lavon 1777 F New Deal 2281 544 2514 RQ or 789 Flower RQ PO 2551 RQ 1138 k Sanford PO RQ3433 Plano RQ RQ Mound Hebron 3014 ), R CHANNING MIAMI 461 718 PGBT Wylie 2642 RQ iv BA RQ2048 PO 114 ), Murphy 2755 RQ er i Lake UV Grapevine S 138 Florence r 87 Fritch 2528 Roanoke 2499 RQ3040 205 RQ Royse City 2341 an UV ca ¤£ 136 Borger To Reydon RQ Lake RQ UV RQ Jarrell m Meredith UV Newark 118 Trophy Gab u PO168 BA Club riel River PO970 c Shallowater RQ1294 Sachse um RQ2130 Westlake 552 487 Bartlett RQ1915 T Skellytown RQ1294 E PO ), Haslet l 2453 Lake PO o 388 1264 Idalou 121 m RQ T River BA RQ UV Addison Fate 35 1600 Coppell 3549 PO Buchanan 1105 RQ dian 385 170 F Carrollton RQ RQ ana ¤£ PAMPA Mobeetie Lorenzo 2257 UV o Richardson ROCKWALL Union C 1729 RQ Southlake Grapevine r 243 MILAM RQ 156 k Mobile City 690 PO WHEELER Reno PO 289 75 PO551 Valley PO BURNET 400 Keller T Farmers UV ¤£ PO 1709 r DFW i BURNET RQ2338 972 1542 Pelican Bay RQ n Branch Garland Lake Ray RQ i PO 2378 199 t HOCKLEY 789 y RQ PO UV RQ1938 Connector UV66 Hubbard 276 ), Rowlett UV Bertram White Deer R 3061 CARSON Dallas/Fort Worth i Inks 3509 RQ POTTER Sanctuary 26 v 261 RQ r To Sweetwater International e 3097 S e WHEELER 289 RQ 1139 UV o Lefors Smyer Eagle 377 UV r RQ 550 BA 1729 Airport u v 344 Lake th Granger i Red 2646 RQ2255 RQ BA RQ3479 ¤£ 114 PO 548 R 40 UV Fork San RQ 114 PO Azle Mountain PO 3405 Gabriel R UV Colleyville 549 McLendon- 1565 Sa RQ i Blue 3029 354 PO RQ n AMARILLO v 908 84 Lake RQ 486 PO ¤£60 e ¤£ BA Chisholm G Granger r Mound Watauga 121 1140 abrie PO OLDHAM 1220 North UV 161 University Park RQ l AMARILLO PANHANDLE RQ1525 RQ Richland UV Riv Weir Lake 1331 Oklahoma Saginaw Euless 2342 er RQ LUBBOCK 835 Hills Bedford Heath 2545 RQ Lake GRAY rk PO 3523 183 Highland Park RQ BA332 PO971 Adrian Fo RQ UV ROCKWALL Georgetown WILLIAMSON VEGA MPO 83 179 Lake North Tarrant Express 356 DALLAS Liberty 183 ), Bishop Hills h ¤£ PO Buffalo Richland 10 UV Irving 1431 1174 1869 ¤£ rt Ransom Canyon 1886 Worth Hurst UV 986 RQ RQ RQ Hill o Wolfforth Springs RQ Hills 740 PO N T GEORGETOWN 29 1063 Lakeside Haltom 356 PO 1855 UV RQ 1786 McLean Shamrock 193 R B UV RQ Thorndale RQ BA Lake 183 iver Sunnyvale UV G ver To San Jon To Sayre Sansom Park City Tr 2900 San Gabriel Ri 168 in P Lake RQ Highland Haven ), ), PO Worth ity 460 Y 1392 Sunrise Groom 3431 Lake DALLAS PO RQ 598 k ), Lyndon B. 1980 AMARILLO RQ 121 PO RQ LUBBOCK MPO e 35°N 35°N B UV Mesquite Beach 1585 Westworth River 352 RQ Weatherford e r UV Johnson 2243 397 Thrall ), Forney Village RQ PO S Oaks Village C Grand Prairie Balch 688 Willow White Settlement e k PO 80 Taylor 62 e £ Terrell O ¤ CLAUDE S £ FORT WORTH g i n Leander ¤ e Springs C 1460 Park a o RQ a 493 ll r Arlington a Cockrell Hill Granite Shoals l BA i t lo t 3325 Westover Hills C Marble Falls r R ), n ad CAPITAL 1730 LUBBOCK RQ V u o COLLINGSWORTH RQ ), 180 o 1 Palisades Lake 41 Meadowlakes 79 F POSlaton C Pantego M 12 741 1641 8 Hutto ¤£ o 183 r UV BA PO RQ 3 Pa Tanglewood 207 rk DONLEY ive 360 - l Ropesville UV ), A o ), Horseshoe 2147 UV 2150 R 287 Lake UV 2831 RQ AREA C D Timbercreek Howardwick RQ ity ¤£ 310 RQ Bay 95 re u Greenbelt Annetta North in UV 2932 Oak Ridge 3406 r Canyon r B RQ Talty Cottonwood R RQ UV e o P T Arlington MCL iver k 3349 r Reservoir Red River Annetta k Arkansas RQ a r Dalworthington 2578 Shores i 287 Aledo 2871 o r 2757 RQ i RQ F RQ e £ MPO Round Rock ¤ Gardens LLANO Cedar a CANYON 168 Benbrook err PO 2192 Forest Hill ), i a Creek r Park RQ1660 T nc RQ 5 a ), T 148 987 DEAF SMITH la CLARENDON 400 PO e r ), l in Jonestown B ARMSTRONG Duncanville Hutchins it PO PO Lago D PO y 3347 212 C Ri Seagoville 175 o Annetta ve ¤£ Post Oak RQ Vista 45 1466 LYNN PO Edgecliff r UV RQ g Crandall ), Buffalo To Mangum Meadow TERRY RQ2106 South Kennedale Bend 112 Lake wn Fo 179 New Home 731 RQ3039 Village of 685 PO To rk WELLINGTON 211 PO 87 Benbrook PO Everman Joe Pool 973 87 RANDALL PO ¤£ E 1825 PO PO £ Hedley 1382 Volente 2769 RQ To Broadview HEREFORD ¤ Lake RQ a KAUFMAN RQ Wilson 377 Lake 342 s UV t R ¤£ 243 Round Pflugerville Wilmer Combine e DeSoto F UV d PARKER Lancaster Mountain o Cedar Hill r 734 k UV71 PO PO619 TARRANT RQ1389 1836 Lake TRAVIS Crowley T RQ 1187 r i Briarcliff MEMPHIS Dodson RQ 67 Glenn Heights n £ i Travis ¤ t 620 696 Mansfield y Oak RQ2322 PO RQ1325 PO Happy y ), a 962 Point 1100 Ferris R Grove RQ R w PO i 60 iv k v Venture ¤£ e 3450 r Burleson e RQ1390 275 r RQ a r BA BA109 RQ3000 PARMER Lakeview To Hollis 664 Scurry 360 Friona P Ovilla 780 Lakeway 1624 . 661 PO SWISHER l BA RQ i RQ3391 PO 983 PO RQ2860 Elgin LEE Cresson a Oak Red Oak 1388 r PO ay BA212 2331 174 RQ BLANCO Village of essw CASTRO RQ T UV Leaf 281 R nor Expr Manor 2377 s Ma m 1902 RQ £ e iv The Hills 2222 l RQ ¤ l 1323 a er RQ Walter CHILDRESS o Briaroaks RQ rn Town h 157 561 Cottonwood Grays Prairie e g s PO 1387 BA d Bee 290 o i RQ Pecan Hill E. Long ¤£ DIMMITT h Midlothian e Cave West 1 BRISCOE P D Red r Cross Timber Rosser P ra ve C 2451 Lake BA 3177 Lake Nazareth ir Ri 660 RQ RQ2244 RQ To Clovis 86 ie Estelline Fo PO Hills 223 UV rk 171 387 3238 BA Bovina UV Joshua ¤£287 PO 813 RQ G 2738 PO i 1704 TULIA 917 RQ Rollingwood 969 lle RQ s HOOD PO PO la JOHNSON CITY ^ 111 n 95 SILVERTON R tu Venus RQ2766 !( BA d UV e l Godley 3094 BA343 UV86 d A ), RQ 290 AUSTIN 2280 663 Palmer ¤£ C ¤£87 o DeCordova JOHNSON RQ PO r T 343 e 2336 3048 £77 BA e Webberville RQ FARWELL RQ 875 ¤ 878 New k To Clovis CHILDRESS River PO167 PO PO HALL Alvarado 3232 Hart Turkey 1706 KAUFMAN RQ Sunset 71 Kress Keene 67 RQ WAXAHACHIE Mexico UV £62 ¤£ 879 UV34 RQ3396 Valley ¤ 1807 1446 PO Garrett Austin-Bergstrom Quitaque PO4 RQ RQ k O 290 International 70 287 ELLIS 876 ¤£ 275 UV c 3136 2613 orth £ i K PO RQ N ¤ BA Airport RQ r e L 877 Dripping Edmonson A RQ1722 1181 Bear Creek PO RQ 2304 d H CLEBURNE 1493 Ennis 283 66 RQ RQ ease QUANAH e OM s River 45 P A o 2415 PO 85 Springs R ¤£ z UV k Lake ive r Bra RQ PO e RQ1441 r Chillicothe 2258 e F RQ San r Bastrop 1718 2135 55 1183 o RQ RQ RQ RQ1826 Leanna C 2239 ¤£70 Earth Lake PO 130 y RQ MULESHOE Springlake Lake UV RQ1209 e Pe T Lake n a 1626 i se Pauline Pat RQ P PLAINVIEW R Bardwell Hays RQ2104 Olton ed Cleburne 34°N 12 1625 150 BAILEY ¤£70 34°N HAYS PO RQ BABA150 VERNON ka PO165 HARDEMAN R WICHITA FALLS auri Creedmoor RQ2430 BASTROP iver To W B LAMB 1623 l 45 RQ Blanco an 2325 967 UV 1327 21 Burkburnett RQ PO Buda), RQ Lockney c UV CHILDRESS o R MPO Sudan ), P ive 163 R FLOYD le ea r i 812 d s FOARD BA v id e er r e PO v e Byers 535 Hale M Ri iv l r 2770 Mustang Ridge R RQ PO COTTLE ), e o Center b orado R To Rogers PADUCAH g Col iv Electra Cashion a e l r Petrolia u MATADOR l d Amherst 287 a R a e i r ver £ t d H I 62 i k e ea ¤ 153 ¤£ C WICHITA d v 32 B r h i i PO e o PO Pleasant o c Woodcreek e r a R 2571 k i RQ 70 Valley T FLOYDADA ich u T W ita CROWELL ¤£ W Santa Rosa a M 230 3237 BA LITTLEFIELD Dean R Lake Texoma R RQ BASTROP Iowa Park r i o e Lake e W v t d Smithville Roaring v e SHERMAN- 214 R i MOTLEY r T Niederwald R n UV 6 183 o 473 i Wimberley Springs v n UV ¤£ a PO To Causey e 1854 HALE e T r a Kyle RQ u er r WICHITA FALLS e Pat Mayse r g iv u W m A n R h 84 t Jolly o ¤£ h o r DENISON e i T D Lake Petersburg o r 71 t R 1185 e m k N ee o RQ UV o Cr Uhland Abernathy d K r F 20 WILBARGER T PO HENRIETTA Big s 484 W r r ich Holliday Lake Wichita a A o it t Hubert MPO e A PO e a hi Mineral LAMAR Diversion d n o Anton iv ic Pottsboro Denison T R R Lakeside W n H.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Consumer Plannlng Section Comprehensive Plannlng Branch
    Consumer Plannlng Section Comprehensive Plannlng Branch, Parks Division Texas Parks and Wildlife Department Austin, Texas Texans Outdoors: An Analysis of 1985 Participation in Outdoor Recreation Activities By Kathryn N. Nichols and Andrew P. Goldbloom Under the Direction of James A. Deloney November, 1989 Comprehensive Planning Branch, Parks Division Texas Parks and Wildlife Department 4200 Smith School Road, Austin, Texas 78744 (512) 389-4900 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Conducting a mail survey requires accuracy and timeliness in every single task. Each individualized survey had to be accounted for, both going out and coming back. Each mailing had to meet a strict deadline. The authors are indebted to all the people who worked on this project. The staff of the Comprehensive Planning Branch, Parks Division, deserve special thanks. This dedicated crew signed letters, mailed, remailed, coded, and entered the data of a twenty-page questionnaire that was sent to over twenty-five thousand Texans with over twelve thousand returned completed. Many other Parks Division staff outside the branch volunteered to assist with stuffing and labeling thousands of envelopes as deadlines drew near. We thank the staff of the Information Services Section for their cooperation in providing individualized letters and labels for survey mailings. We also appreciate the dedication of the staff in the mailroom for processing up­ wards of seventy-five thousand pieces of mail. Lastly, we thank the staff in the print shop for their courteous assistance in reproducing the various documents. Although the above are gratefully acknowledged, they are absolved from any responsibility for any errors or omissions that may have occurred. ii TEXANS OUTDOORS: AN ANALYSIS OF 1985 PARTICIPATION IN OUTDOOR RECREATION ACTIVITIES TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Stormwater Management Program 2013-2018 Appendix A
    Appendix A 2012 Texas Integrated Report - Texas 303(d) List (Category 5) 2012 Texas Integrated Report - Texas 303(d) List (Category 5) As required under Sections 303(d) and 304(a) of the federal Clean Water Act, this list identifies the water bodies in or bordering Texas for which effluent limitations are not stringent enough to implement water quality standards, and for which the associated pollutants are suitable for measurement by maximum daily load. In addition, the TCEQ also develops a schedule identifying Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) that will be initiated in the next two years for priority impaired waters. Issuance of permits to discharge into 303(d)-listed water bodies is described in the TCEQ regulatory guidance document Procedures to Implement the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards (January 2003, RG-194). Impairments are limited to the geographic area described by the Assessment Unit and identified with a six or seven-digit AU_ID. A TMDL for each impaired parameter will be developed to allocate pollutant loads from contributing sources that affect the parameter of concern in each Assessment Unit. The TMDL will be identified and counted using a six or seven-digit AU_ID. Water Quality permits that are issued before a TMDL is approved will not increase pollutant loading that would contribute to the impairment identified for the Assessment Unit. Explanation of Column Headings SegID and Name: The unique identifier (SegID), segment name, and location of the water body. The SegID may be one of two types of numbers. The first type is a classified segment number (4 digits, e.g., 0218), as defined in Appendix A of the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards (TSWQS).
    [Show full text]
  • Nutrient Delivery from the Mississippi River to the Gulf of Mexico And
    the entire landscape must be considered if hydrologic and water quality models are doi:10.2489/jswc.69.1.26 used to predict the delivery of sediment and nutrients. Similarly, the contribution of other sources (including noncultivated lands, urban areas, forests, and the direct discharge Nutrient delivery from the Mississippi of waste water to streams and rivers) should be accounted for. In addition, processes River to the Gulf of Mexico and effects of occurring in streams, lakes, and reservoirs affect the fate of pollutants as they are trans- cropland conservation ported through the system and should also be included. M.J. White, C. Santhi, N. Kannan, J.G. Arnold, D. Harmel, L. Norfleet, P. Allen, M. DiLuzio, X. Comprehensive water quality simulation Wang, J. Atwood, E. Haney, and M. Vaughn Johnson at the scale of the Mississippi River Basin (MRB, 3,220,000 km2 [1,240,000 mi2]) is Abstract: Excessive nutrients transported from the Mississippi River Basin (MRB) have cre- a difficult task; thus, only a few modeling ated a hypoxic zone within the Gulf of Mexico, with numerous negative ecological effects. efforts at that scale have been conducted Copyright © 2014 Soil and Water Conservation Society. All rights reserved. Furthermore, federal expenditures on agricultural conservation practices have received to date. The contiguous United States was Journal of Soil and Water Conservation intense scrutiny in recent years. Partly driven by these factors, the USDA Conservation simulated by Srinivasan et al. (1998) in the Effects Assessment Project (CEAP) recently completed a comprehensive evaluation of nutri- Hydrologic Unit Model for the United ent sources and delivery to the Gulf.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic and Environmental Implications of Phosphorus Control at North Bosque River Wastewater Treatment Plants Keith Keplinger, Alex Tanter, and James Houser
    Economic and Environmental Implications of Phosphorus Control at North Bosque River Wastewater Treatment Plants Keith Keplinger, Alex Tanter, and James Houser TR0312 July 2003 Economic and Environmental Implications of Phosphorus Controls Acknowledgments The authors wish to thank a number of individuals for making this research possible. Data on wastewater treatment plant parameters and sewer use and rates for the City of Stephenville were made available by Danny Johnson and Mark Kaiser, City of Stephenville, and Johnie Davis, OMI, Inc. Information on sewer use and rates for other communities located along the North Bosque River was supplied by various municipal personnel from those communities. Larry Beran, TIAER, initiated the project while Ron Jones, TIAER, was instrumental in securing a working relationship with the City of Stephenville. Edward Osei, TIAER, assisted with calculus solutions, while Larry Hauck, TIAER, provided overall direction and review of this report. The research upon which this report is based was financed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Policy Development, cooperating agreement number CR 826807-01-1. For more information about this document or any other TIAER document, e-mail [email protected]. Authors Keith Keplinger, research economist, TIAER, [email protected] Alex Tanter, research associate, TIAER, [email protected] James Houser, research scientist, TIAER, [email protected] EI7.01.02 ii Economic and Environmental Implications of Phosphorus Controls Abstract Phosphorus (P) control at wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in the United States has been practiced since at least the 1970s, when effluent limits were placed on WWTPs in the Great Lakes region and in Vermont in order to reverse eutrophication of the Great Lakes and Lake Champlain, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Gazetteer of Streams of Texas
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRANKLIN K. LANE, Secretary UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, Director Water-Supply Paper 448 GAZETTEER OF STREAMS OF TEXAS PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF GLENN A. GRAY WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT FEINTING OFFICE 1919 GAZETTEER OF STREAMS OF TEXAS. Prepared under the direction of GLENN A. GRAY. INTRODUCTION. The following pages contain a gazetteer of streams, lakes, and ponds as shown by the topographic maps of Texas which were pre­ pared by the United States Geological Survey and, in areas not covered by the topographic maps, by State of Texas county maps and the post-route map of Texas. For many streams a contour map of Texas, prepared in 1899 by Robert T. Hill, was consulted, as well as maps compiled by private surveys, engineering corporations, the State Board of Water Engineers, and the International Boundary Commission. An effort has been made to eliminate errors where practicable by personal reconnaissance. All the descriptions are based on the best available maps, and their accuracy therefore depends on that of the maps. Descriptions of streams in the central part of the State, adjacent to the Bio Grande above Brewster County, and in parts of Brewster, Terrell, Bowie, Casg, Btirleson, Brazos, Grimes, Washington, Harris, Bexar, Wichita, Wilbarger, Montague, Coke, and Graysoh counties were compiled by means of topographic maps and are of a good degree of accuracy. It should be understood, however, that all statements of elevation, length, and fall are roughly approximate. The Geological Survey topographic maps used are cited in the de­ scriptions of the streams and are listed below.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Geological Survey
    DEFARTM KUT OF THE 1STEK1OK BULLETIN OK THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY No. 19O S F, GEOGRAPHY, 28 WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1902 UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIRECTOR GAZETTEEK OF TEXAS BY HENRY G-A-NNETT WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1902 CONTENTS Page. Area .................................................................... 11 Topography and drainage..... ............................................ 12 Climate.................................................................. 12 Forests ...............................................................'... 13 Exploration and settlement............................................... 13 Population..............'................................................. 14 Industries ............................................................... 16 Lands and surveys........................................................ 17 Railroads................................................................. 17 The gazetteer............................................................. 18 ILLUSTRATIONS. Page. PF,ATE I. Map of Texas ................................................ At end. ry (A, Mean annual temperature.......:............................ 12 \B, Mean annual rainfall ........................................ 12 -ryj (A, Magnetic declination ........................................ 12 I B, Wooded areas............................................... 12 Density of population in 1850 ................................ 14 B, Density of population in 1860
    [Show full text]
  • History of Bosque County, Texas (Unpublished Master's Thesis), University of Texas Library, Austin
    A History of Texas BY William C. Pool Basque County, Texas William C.' Pool Y ILLUS,FILAnLINS BY THE AUTHOR t.0~c $22 SAN MARCOS RECORD PRESS San Marcos, 1914 TO MARY RUTH AND HER GRANDPARENTS Copyright 1954 By WILLIAM C. POOL PREFACE In 1904 the people of Bosque County gathered on the lawn of the old Emerson Hotel at Meridian to celebrate the fiftieth anniversary of the or- ganization of the county. On this occasion two young Meridian attorneys -Hugh J. and Calvin M. Cureton-read a paper entitled Sketch of the Early History of Bosque County. This rare historical narrative was pub- lished by the Meridian Tribune. A half a century has passed since publica- tion of the Cureton pamphlet; yet it remains the only printed work on the history of the county. In addition to the Cureton story, articles relative to the history of the lands along the Bosque have appeared from time to time in the newspapers of Texas and at least three research projects on Bosque subjects are buried deep in the unread manuscripts that represent theses for the Master of Arts degree at the University of Texas. The intent of this study is to relate the history of the settlements in Bosque County between the years 1850 and 1954. After a summary of the geographical and geological features of the Bosque region, a brief backpound of the Sterling C. Robertson colony and early history of Milam County is presented as a background to the progress of the central Texas frontier. Permanent settlement in Bosque County dates from the year 1850, Ihe year that Albert Barton and Ewe11 Everett brought their families to the hither edge of what was then McLennan County.
    [Show full text]
  • Iversity: of Texas Bulletin 234:0: October 22, 1923
    Iversity: of Texas Bulletin 234:0: October 22, 1923 GEOLOGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES OF MCLENNAN COUNTY BY W. S. ADKINS BUaSAU OF ECONOMIC GEOLOCrY AKD TECHKrOX.OGU" BIVISSOH Or SCO2TOMZC &EOIOGY J. A. .UDDEN, Director of the Bureau and Head of the Division PUBLISHED BY THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN 8144-923-2500 University of Texas Bulletin No. 2340: October 22, 1923 GEOLOGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES OF MCLENNAN COUNTY BY W. S. ADKINS BUREAU OF ECONOMIC GEOLOGY AND TECHNOLOGY DIVISION OF ECONOMIC GEOLOGY J. A. UDDEN, Director of the Bureau and Head of the Division PUBLISHED BY THE UNIVERSITY FOUR TIMES A MONTH AND ENTERED AS' SECOND-CLASS MATTER AT THE POSTOPFICE AT AUSTIN, TEXAS, UNDER THE ACT OF AUGUST 24, 1912 The benefits of education and of useful knowledge, generally diffused through a community, are essential to the preservationof a free govern- ment. Sam Houston. Cultivated mind is the guardian genius of democracy. It is the only dictator that freemen acknowl- edge and the only security that freemen desire. Mirabeau B. Lamar. Contents Page Introduction 7 Physiography and Topography 9 Drainage 11 Bosque Escarpment 12 Physiographic Divisions 13 Base map 13 Magnetic station 15 Precise levels 17 Elevations " 18 The Geologic Section 19 Pre-Cambrian (?) 25 Paleozoic 25 Comanchean (Lower Cretaceous) 28 Trinity Division 28 Basal sands 28 Glenrose formation 29 Equivalents of the Paluxy sand 30 Predericksburg Division 30 Walnut formation 30 Comanche Peak formation 32 Edwards formation 33 Washita Division 38 Georgetown formation 38 Del Rio formation
    [Show full text]
  • Baylor Geological Studies
    BAYLORGEOLOGICA L STUDIES FALL 1977 Bulletin No. 33 Flood Potential of the Basin ARTHUR L BISHOP thinking is more important than elaborate FRANK PH.D. PROFESSOR OF GEOLOGY BAYLOR UNIVERSITY 1929-1934 Objectives of Geological Training at Baylor The training of a geologist in a university covers but a few years; his education continues throughout his active life. The purposes of train­ ing geologists at Baylor University are to provide a sound basis of understanding and to foster a truly geological point of view, both of which are essential for continued professional growth. The staff considers geology to be unique among sciences since it is primarily a field science. All geologic research in­ cluding that done in laboratories must be firmly supported by field observations. The student is encouraged to develop an inquiring ob­ jective attitude and to examine critically all geological concepts and principles. The development of a mature and professional attitude toward geology and geological research is a principal concern of the department. THE BAYLOR UNIVERSITY PRESS WACO, TEXAS BAYLOR GEOLOGICAL STUDIES BULLETIN NO. 33 Flood Potential of the Bosque Basin Arthur L. Bishop BAYLOR UNIVERSITY Department of Geology Waco, Texas Fall, 1977 Baylor Geological Studies EDITORIAL STAFF Jean M. Spencer, M.S., Editor environmental and medical geology O. T. Hayward, Ph.D., Advisor, Cartographic Editor urban geology and what have you Harold H. Beaver, Ph.D. invertebrate paleontology, petroleum geology, and facies geology James W. Dixon, Jr., Ph.D. stratigraphy, paleontology, structure Robert G. Font, Ph.D. engineering geology, geomechanics, tectonophysics Gustavo A. Morales, Ph.D. invertebrate paleontology, micropaleontology, stratigraphy, oceanography Jerry N.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecosystem Restoration Project Plan Bosque River Watershed
    ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION PROJECT BOSQUE RIVER WATERSHED Bosque, Coryell, Hamilton, McLennan, Somervell and Erath Counties, Texas TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary ...................................................................................................................................................3 Purpose and Need for Action..............................................................................................................6 Introduction.......................................................................................................................................6 Physical Features and Environmental Factors...................................................................................6 Purpose and Need for the Project......................................................................................................8 Watershed Problems and Opportunities............................................................................................9 Ecosystem Restoration Project ........................................................................................................10 Areas of Consideration....................................................................................................................10 Selected Sub-Watersheds................................................................................................................10 Description of Ecosystem Restoration Project ...............................................................................11 Implementation of the Plan...............................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Continuous Monitoring in the Lone Star State
    Waltz Across Texas: Continuous Monitoring in the Lone Star State Texas Commission On Environmental Quality Continuous Water Quality Monitoring Network Stops Along the Way June 2001 Texas Legislative directive to monitor water quality downstream of dairy Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs) in North Central Texas. First Continuous Water Quality Monitoring Stations in Upper North Bosque River (2) and Leon River (2). Initially included only sensor based parameters. Old No. (70)1 • Solar powered • Landline phone • T, SC, pH, DO • Nutrient ISE sensors Raising the Bar AquaLab auto-analyzers were added to analyze nitrogen and phosphorus compounds and turbidity Greater complexity and greater staff resource demands Controlled environment (HVAC) Hard Wired powered Landline phone T, SC, pH, DO, TURB Wet chemistry SRP Nitrogen species ISE sensors Near Real-Time data from CWQMN stations published online at: www.texaswaterdata.org Secondary Simplification With as many as eight auto-analyzers in operation, operation and maintenance required between 1.5 and 2.0 FTEs. Assessment of the data revealed good to excellent correlations between total nutrients (sum of N and P analytes) and specific conductance. We pulled the plug. CWQMN Participants TCEQ operates/maintains 11 stations in the Lower Rio Grande Valley and the Upper North Bosque River USGS Texas operates/maintains 15 CWQMN stations along the Rio Grande, Arroyo Colorado and Pecos River USGS New Mexico operates/maintains 1 CWQMN station outside of Texas Cooperative stations have been operated
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatics, Ichthyology & Wetland Ecology
    Aquatics, Ichthyology & Wetland Ecology Texas Master Naturalist Program El Camino Real Chapter Dec 6, 2013 Aquatic Ecology Module • Water • Watersheds • Streams & stream habitats • Ponds & pond management 540 ¤£77 §¨¦ ¤£62 Oklahoma City Fort Smith Amarillo §¨¦40 Norman ¤£287 §¨¦44 §¨¦35 LittleLittle RockRock LawtonLawton §¨¦27 ¤£69 §¨¦30 £70 ¤ Brazos River Witchita Falls ¤£75 ¤£82 LubbockLubbock ¤£75 ¤£81 87 ¤£ Plano Dallas Metro Area Fort Worth Bossier City Abilene Tyler 35W§¨¦ §¨¦35E Midland §¨¦49 Odessa Brazos River 20 Waco §¨¦ San Angelo §¨¦10 45 Bryan §¨¦ 210 Austin §¨¦ Beaumont ¤£59 Port Arthur Houston Metro Area ¤£281 San Antonio §¨¦37 Copperas Creek Bosque River Childress Creek Aquilla Creek Spring Creek Leon River Brazos River Navasota River South Leon River Meridian Creek Christmas Creek Neils Creek Big Creek Middle Bosque River Hog Creek Coryell Creek Tehuacana Creek Big Creek Big Bennett Creek Cowhouse Creek Cow Bayou Steele Creek Simms Creek Lampasas River Owl Creek Pond Creek Sulphur Creek Little Brazos RiverBig Elm Creek Walnut Creek Cedar Creek Mesquite Creek Salado Creek Little River Wickson Creek Berry Creek Cedar Creek San Gabriel River Davidson Creek Gibbons Creek Brushy Creek Old River Yegua Creek West Yegua Creek Types of aquatic systems • Lotic – streams, rivers • Lentic – ponds, lakes, reservoirs Lotic systems – springs, streams, rivers • Energy source is from the • Flow is important outside (exogenous) • Gradient • Allochthonous production • Meanders and Bends (from elsewhere) • Flood plains • Organisms near/on/in
    [Show full text]