DOCSLIB.ORG

Sutherland WEF EGI

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sutherland WEF EGI Map 11 Visual sensitivity map of the properties hosting the proposed electrical infrastructure. VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT pg 80 Map 12 Map showing various renewable energy projects in the region surrounding the Sutherland electrical infrastructure project. The map shows the properties on which the projects will be developed and not the footprints of the proposed developments. VISUAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT pg 81 HERITAGE IMPACT ASSESSMENT: PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF A SUBSTATION AND 132 KV DISTRIBUTION LINE TO SUPPORT THE PROPOSED SUTHERLAND WEF, SUTHERLAND AND LAINGSBURG MAGISTERIAL DISTRICTS, NORTHERN AND WESTERN CAPE SAHRA Case ID: 10493 HWC Case No.: 17020605AS0207E Required under Section 38 (8) of the National Heritage Resources Act (No. 25 of 1999). Report for: CSIR – Environmental Management Services P.O. Box 320, Stellenbosch, 7599 Tel: 031 242 2318 Email: [email protected] On behalf of: South Africa Mainstream Renewable Power Developments (Pty) Ltd Dr Jayson Orton ASHA Consulting (Pty) Ltd 6A Scarborough Road, Muizenberg, 7945 Tel: (021) 788 8425 | 083 272 3225 Email: [email protected] 1st draft: 24 March 2017 2nd draft: 21 May 2017 Final report: 27 June 2017 Specialist declaration I, Jayson Orton, as the appointed independent specialist, in terms of the 2014 EIA Regulations, hereby declare that I: • I act as the independent specialist in this application; • I perform the work relating to the application in an objective manner, even if this results in views and findings that are not favourable to the applicant; • regard the information contained in this report as it relates to my specialist input/study to be true and correct, and do not have and will not have any financial interest in the undertaking of the activity, other than remuneration for work performed in terms of the NEMA, the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 2014 and any specific environmental management Act; • I declare that there are no circumstances that may compromise my objectivity in performing such work; • I have expertise in conducting the specialist report relevant to this application, including knowledge of the Act, Regulations and any guidelines that have relevance to the proposed activity; • I will comply with the Act, Regulations and all other applicable legislation; • I have no, and will not engage in, conflicting interests in the undertaking of the activity; • I have no vested interest in the proposed activity proceeding; • I undertake to disclose to the applicant and the competent authority all material information in my possession that reasonably has or may have the potential of influencing - any decision to be taken with respect to the application by the competent authority; and - the objectivity of any report, plan or document to be prepared by myself for submission to the competent authority; • I have ensured that information containing all relevant facts in respect of the specialist input/study was distributed or made available to interested and affected parties and the public and that participation by interested and affected parties was facilitated in such a manner that all interested and affected parties were provided with a reasonable opportunity to participate and to provide comments on the specialist input/study; • I have ensured that the comments of all interested and affected parties on the specialist input/study were considered, recorded and submitted to the competent authority in respect of the application; • all the particulars furnished by me in this specialist input/study are true and correct; and • I realise that a false declaration is an offence in terms of regulation 48 and is punishable in terms of section 24F of the Act. Name of Specialist: _____JAYSON ORTON___________________ Signature of the specialist: _____ _________________________ Date: __________24 MARCH 2017______________________ ASHA Consulting (Pty) Ltd | Reg. no.: 2013/220482/07 iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. Site Name Electrical grid infrastructure to support the proposed Sutherland Wind Energy Facility (WEF) 2. Location The proposed power line would traverse the following properties (listed from west to east as for Alternative 2): • Northern Cape: Remaining Extent of Beeren Valley 150, Remaining Extent of Nooitgedacht 148, Remaining Extent of Hartbeesfontein 147, Portion 1 and Remaining Extent of Farm 219; and • Western Cape: Farm 280, Portion 1 of Rheebokkfontein 4, Portion 2 of Rheebokkfontein 4, Portion 2 of De Molen 5, Portion 6 of Hamelkraal 16, and Portion 7 of Hamelkraal 16. The proposed distribution line would run from an on-site substation at S32° 38’ 38” E20° 54’ 52” to one of two proposed third party substations (i.e. the proposed collector hub and Eskom Nuwerust Substation) to the east, neither of which are part of the present assessment. The easternmost substation would be located at S32° 42’ 00” E21° 15' 32”. There are two alternatives for the third party substation and associated distribution line routing, with the first being confined to Northern Cape and the second extending further east into Western Cape. 3. Locality Plan 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 km N SUTHERLAND 3220 (Mapping information supplied by Chief Directorate: National Geo-Spatial Information. Website: wwwi.ngi.gov.za) R354 NORTHERN CAPE WESTERN CAPE Map showing the location of the study area. Alternative 1 is shown in pink, while Alternative 2 follows the same alignment but extends along the green line to the east. ASHA Consulting (Pty) Ltd | Reg. no.: 2013/220482/07 iv 4. Description of Proposed Development It is proposed to construct the following: • An on-site substation in Northern Cape with an operations and maintenance building and a laydown area; • A 132 kV distribution line extending from the on-site substation to a third party substation in Northern Cape (Alternative 1; about 14 km long) or Western Cape (Alternative 2, about 41 km long); • A connection to the relevant third party substation; and • A service road below the power line (the road deviates from the power line in one short section of Alternative 2). It should be noted that there are three separate power line applications being conducted simultaneously. Should all three be approved and receive preferred bidder status then it is proposed to link them to one another as follows: a single line would be constructed from each of the proposed Sutherland 2 WEF and Rietrug WEF Substations to the proposed Sutherland WEF Substation with only a single line being constructed from the Sutherland WEF substation on to either of the Alternative 1 or 2 termini. Both alternatives for all three projects end at the same point in the east (the yellow and orange substations in Figure 1) but start in different places in the west. 5. Heritage Resources Identified Archaeological remains are generally scarce but are found throughout the area. Very little Stone Age material was found with just two ‘sites’ being recorded: a kraal complex and a geometric rock art site. Isolated stone artefacts were remarkably rare. The vast majority of archaeological remains found were historical and ranged from a ruined farm complex to small, isolated ruined structures and isolated individual artefacts. Alternative 2 has more significant sites in close proximity to it but, because the alignment was devised by the present author to avoid these sites, significant impacts are not expected. Just one site, a small ruined stone structure, may be directly impacted; it lies within the development envelope of the proposed Sutherland on-site substation but may be avoided by the final layout. Although palaeontological resources were found throughout much of the study area, the vast majority were of very limited significance. Two important fossil sites were found but both were located away from the proposed power line footprint and impacts are not expected. Some graveyards and buildings are present in the area but are located well away from the proposed power line alignments and no impacts are expected. The rural cultural landscape extends throughout the study area but, aside from fences and farm tracks, human interventions are generally very sparse. The site lies within a proposed Renewable Energy Development Zone (REDZ) and it is noted that a new electrical layer is due to be added to this landscape in the very near future. ASHA Consulting (Pty) Ltd | Reg. no.: 2013/220482/07 v 6. Anticipated Impacts on Heritage Resources Both Alternative 1 and Alternative 2 have heritage sites within a few hundred metres of their alignments but direct impacts are not expected. However, a potentially sensitive part of Alternative 2 could not be surveyed in the field. Just one heritage resource was found to lie directly within the proposed development envelope and that was a small stone ruin within the proposed on-site substation area. It is also noted that the Stone Age kraal complex is bisected by an access road that might be used during development. The greater landscape, especially along the escarpment, is visually significant but because it lies within a proposed REDZ the area is very likely to be devoted to renewable energy developments (some facilities are already scheduled for construction in 2017) and the proposed electrical grid infrastructure would thus not be out of place. 7. Recommendations Because there are unlikely to be significant impacts to heritage resources it is recommended that the proposed development be authorised. However, the following conditions should be incorporated into the Environmental Authorisation: • Any areas not yet surveyed should be examined
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The City of Cape Town July 2006 General Valuation Annexure
    The City of Cape Town July 2006 General Valuation An audit of & comments on the City of Cape Town’s valuation process in terms of the Municipal Property Rates Act 6 of 2004 ____________________________________________________________ Annexure “B” MINUTES of a meeting of the Far South Peninsula Community Forum with councillor Ian Neilson and his subsequent written reply, with the GCTCA’s comments thereon. A. MINUTES OF MEETING of Tuesday 2nd October 2007 in the Fish Hoek Civic Centre council boardroom at 18h00 Present: Cllrs Ian Neilson, Nicki Holderness, Felicity Purchase, Demetri Qually and Simon Liell-Cock (chairperson), Lesley Shackleton, Allen Rose-Innes, Neil Grant, Graham Noble, Doug Tunbridge, Kevin McCarthy, Rory Sales, Steve Perrett and Pat Schultz Apologies: Kommetjie Ratepayers Association Welcome and Introduction: Simon welcomed Cllr Neilson and all present. FSPCF member associations are concerned about the serious problems caused by inaccurate valuations and want to help find a satisfactory way forward. Representatives present were all members of rate payers and other civic organisations in the Far South Peninsula who are members of the FSPCF, which deals with common Far South issues. All FSPCF associations acknowledge the necessity to cross-subsidise poorer areas in the city. This meeting is not to discuss the problems themselves but to identify steps that can be taken to solve them. However, a summary of problems had been prepared by Lesley and Allen as background to this discussion, and a copy had been e-mailed to Cllr Neilson with the request that he respond later in writing to the points raised. Cllr Neilson’s Address: The Cllr said he would like to begin with some general background: Council faced a new set of circumstances with the latest valuation process.
    [Show full text]
  • Approved HOM Minutes 02 February 2021
    APPROVED MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF HERITAGE WESTERN CAPE, HERITAGE OFFICERS MEETING Held on Tuesday, 2 February 2021, HOMS MEETING VIA MICROSOFT TEAMS, scheduled for 08:30 1. OPENING AND WELCOME The Chairperson, Mr Jonathan Windvogel officially opened the meeting at 08:30 and welcomed everyone present. 2. ATTENDANCE Members Members of Staff Mr Peter Buttgens (BP) 08:50 Ms Aneeqah Brown (AB) (secretary) Ms Laura Milandri (LM)08:30 Mr Jonathan Windvogel (JW)(Assitant Director) Ms Stephanie Barnardt (SB)(Case Officer) Ms Khanyisile Bonile (KB)( Case Officer) Ms Sandisiwe Matole (SM)(Case Officer) Mr Thando Zingange (TZ)(Case Officer) Ms Anita Shologu (AS)(Intern Admin support) Ms Xola Mlwandle (XM)(Intern Admin support) Legal Advisor Ms Cathy Ann Potgieter (CAP) Visitors Mr Vincent Marincowitz Mr Ron Martin Mr Yunus Karriem Mr Achmat Salie Mr Zaid Orrie Ms Paolo Costantino Ms Anne-Laure Knockaert Mr Johan Cornelius Ms Adelaide Combrink Mr Jan Desseyn Mr Gavin Jacobs Ms Helen Paice Observers None 3 APOLOGIES Ms Nokubonga Dlamini (ND)(Case Officer) Absent None 4. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 4.1 Dated 2 February 2021. HOMS Minutes 2 February 2021 Page 1 of 24 The items relevant to the meeting were noted as those assigned in the case allocation for the meeting of 2 February 2021. 5. Approval of Minutes of the Previous Meetings 5.1 The minutes will be approved at the HOMs meeting on the 8th of February 2021. Disclosure of conflict of interest Item 12.1- PB Item 12.27 -LM Item 12.28 - LM Item 12.29 - LM Item 12.30 - LM Confidential matters None 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater a Source of Water for the Deep South
    GROUNDWATER A SOURCE OF WATER FOR THE DEEP SOUTH Roger Parsons 1, John Coetzee 2 and Chris Wise 2 1Parsons and Associates Specialist Groundwater Consultants, PO Box 2606 Somerset West 7129. Tel (021) 855-2480. E-mail: [email protected] 2Jeffares and Green (Pty) Ltd ABSTRACT Adequate supply of water to the southern suburbs of Cape Town, including Fish Hoek, Simon’s Town and Noordhoek, is increasingly coming under threat as these suburbs expand and their demand for water increases. Upgrading and expanding existing water reticulation pipelines through Muizenberg to these areas is possible, but will be expensive and disruptive. Alternative sources of water were hence considered, including the construction of a dam at Brooklands above Simon’s Town and development of local groundwater resources. This paper describes the potential for developing groundwater resources to increase a secure supply of water to these areas. INTRODUCTION The area south of Clovelly – including Fish Hoek, Noordhoek, Simon’s Town, Scarborough and Kommetjie – currently obtains water from water resources above Simon’s Town (Lewis-Gay Dam, Kleinplaas Dam, and Rawson Dam) and via a pipeline running through Muizenberg and Kalk Bay. A dam site at Brooklands was identified some 30 years ago as a potential future source of water to augment existing supplies (Figure 1). In response to a land claim – parts of which would be flooded should the dam be built - the City of Cape Town investigated whether the Brooklands Dam site was still required. To be able to make an informed decision regarding the reservation of the land for construction of the Brooklands Dam at some point in the future, the City of Cape Town commissioned a study to investigate water resource and supply options for the area colloquially referred to as the Deep South.
    [Show full text]
  • Approved HOM Minutes 31 May 2021
    APPROVED MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF HERITAGE WESTERN CAPE, HERITAGE OFFICERS MEETING Held on Monday, 31 May 2021, HOMS MEETING VIA MICROSOFT TEAMS, scheduled for 8:30 1. OPENING AND WELCOME The Chairperson, Mr Jonathan Windvogel officially opened the meeting at 08:30 and welcomed everyone present. 2. ATTENDANCE Members Members of Staff Laura Milandri (LM) Ms Aneeqah Brown (AB) (secretary) Peter Buttgens (PB) Mr Jonathan Windvogel (JW) (Assistant Director) Ms Stephanie Barnardt (SB) (Case Officer) Ms Xola Mlwandle (XM) (Intern) Ms Anita Shologu (AS) (Intern Admin support) Ms Zikhona Sigonya (ZS) (Intern Admin support) Ms Muneerah Solomon (MS) Ms Ayanda Mdludlu (AM) Legal Advisor Ms Cathy-Ann Potgieter (CAP) Visitors Ms. Nicolene Visser Observers None 3 Apologies Absent None 4. Approval of Agenda 4.1 31 May 2021 5. Approval of Minutes of the Previous Meeting 5.1 17 May 2021 5.2 24 May 2021 6. Disclosure of conflict of interest 6.1 LM: Item 11.2 & 12.32 7. Confidential matters 7.1 None 8. Standing Items Approved HOMS Minutes _31 May 2021 Page 1 of 13 8.1 Site inspections undertaken. 8.1.1 None 8.2 Proposed Site Inspection 8.2.1 None 8.3 Site Inspection Reports 8.4 Preparation for the upcoming coming committee meetings 8.4.1 APM 2 June 2021 8.5 Interim and Close out Reports 8.5.1 None 8.6 Incomplete Applications 11.1 Proposed Additions and Alterations on Erf 100, 39 Barnard Street, Gansbaai, S34-A&A Case No: 21042809XM0507E 12.3 Proposed Additions and Alterations on Erf 17299, 110A Main Road, Paarl, S27-A&A Case No: 21030215AM0519E 12.7 Proposed Additions and Alterations on Erf 624, 1 Loader Street, De Waterkant, S34-A&A Case No: 21041401AM0518E 12.9 Proposed Additions and Alterations on Erf 86775, 11 Milner Road, Muizenberg, S34-A&A Case No: 21040101AM0521E 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Dev Plan Southern Dist Technical
    Technical draft 1: SDP / EMF Southern District (H) - for comment and discussion only August 2009 1 Technical draft 1: SDP / EMF Southern District (H) - for comment and discussion only August 2009 2 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 PURPOSE ............................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 LEGAL STATUS AND VALIDITY .............................................................................................................................. 2 1.3 KEY COMPONENTS OF THE DISTRICT SDP AND EMF ............................................................................................ 2 1.4 PROCESS ................................................................................................................................................................ 3 1.5 STUDY AREA ......................................................................................................................................................... 3 2. DIRECTIVES ............................................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 NATIONAL AND REGIONAL PLANNING INFORMANTS ............................................................................................ 5 2.2 METROPOLITAN AND DISTRICT PLANNING INFORMANTS .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Manifesto English
    People’s Bylaw Manifesto for a new Civic Participation Bylaw in Cape Town Background: On the 17th August 2017, eight Civic Associations in Cape Town (Bo Kaap Civic Association, Observatory Civic Association - OCA, Phillipi Horticultural Association, Pinelands Ratepayers Association, Sybrand Park Civic, Woodstock Residents Association, Princess Vlei Forum and Greater Cape Town Civic Alliance - GCTCA) met to explore the possibility of a Civic-led bylaw on participation. The meeting was prompted by our consistent previous experiences of being frustrated in our engagements with local government. All civics reported examples of problematic, unproductive and tokenist engagements, which have left all parties dissatisfied, adversely impacting on the trust of communities in the very democratic processes established by our Constitution to give communities greater voice in decisions affecting them. This initiative seeks to be proactive about the participation we would like to see - by exploring the idea of a Municipal bylaw which would set out terms for participation governing City-civic interactions. Other countries and cities have succeeded in establishing similar kinds of bylaws and systems that try to entrench more meaningful forms of participation. We therefore see this bylaw as a civic-driven initiative intended to consolidate participative processes as part of democratic governance within a city framed as a Commons. It would be based on our Constitutional principles and provide clearer guidance to City officials about how to pursue public participation. How we get to the final outcome and exactly what form the final outcome is to take, will be determined by the Civics who drive this process. But it was felt more important to initiate the process and let the participants define the details as we go forward.
    [Show full text]
  • RESILIENT CAPE TOWN Preliminary Resilience Assessment
    RESILIENT CAPE TOWN Preliminary Resilience Assessment RESILIENT CAPE TOWN Resilient Cape Town: Preliminary Resilience Assessment Resilient Cape Town: Preliminary Resilience Assessment is published by the Resilience Department in the Directorate of Corporate Services, City of Cape Town. It has been prepared after consultation with numerous stakeholders across the city. This document is prepared for discussion purposes only. It marks the completion of Phase I of the journey towards the creation of Cape Town’s first Resilience Strategy. The City of Cape Town is appreciative to 100 Resilient Cities, pioneered by the Rockefeller Foundation, for its ongoing support in development of the Resilience Strategy. Noting process This document was presented for noting to the following structures in the City of Cape Town before publication: Executive Management Team on 24 May 2018 Section 79 Committee on Sustainability and Resilience on 13 June 2018 Mayoral Committee on 7 August 2018 Document authors Craig Kesson – Chief Resilience Officer Gareth Morgan – Director: Resilience Cayley Green – Senior Resilience Analyst Project Administrator Megan Williams Acknowledgements The Resilience Department would like to express its appreciation to the following organisations and City departments for assisting in the production of this document: Arup Communications Department, City of Cape Town Department of Organisational Policy and Planning, City of Cape Town GreenCape Public Participation Unit, City of Cape Town Comments If you have any comments or queries about this document please direct them to cayley.green@ capetown.gov.za. 2 Contents 1. DEVELOPING A RESILIENCE STRATEGY FOR CAPE TOWN 4 1.1 Understanding Resilience (Key definitions and concepts) 7 1.2. The City Resilience framework 10 1.3 The Resilience Strategy journey 12 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Cape Town Spatial Development Framework Statutory Report
    CAPE TOWN SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK STATUTORY REPORT CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 8 5 STRATEGIES, POLICY STATEMENTS AND POLICY GUIDELINES 38 1.1 Purpose of the Spatial Development Framework 8 5.1 Key strategy 1: 1.2 Strategic starting points 8 Plan for employment, and improve access to 1.2.1 Cape Town 2040 Vision 8 economic opportunities 39 1.2.2 Spatial Development Goals 9 5.1.1 Promote inclusive, shared economic growth 1.2.3 Spatial Development Principles 9 and development 40 P1 Maintain and enhance the features of Cape Town 1.3 Towards a rationalised, policy-driven land use that attract investors, visitors and skilled labour management system 10 P2 Support investors through improved information, 1.4 Legal status of the Cape Town Spatial cross-sectoral planning and removal of red tape Development Framework 12 P3 Introduce land use policies and mechanisms that will support the development of small business 1.5 Overview of the Cape Town Spatial Development (both informal and formal) Framework preparation process 13 P4 Encourage area specialisation and the development of a diverse, mutually supportive 2 DEVELOPMENT AND POLICY CONTEXT 14 system of economic areas 2.1 Global development context 14 P5 Encourage the use of available economic incentives P6 Promote regional economic planning 2.2 Legislative context 14 5.1.2 Address spatial economic imbalances 42 2.3 Strategy and policy context 16 P7 Unlock employment-generating opportunities within the Metro Southeast and Atlantis 3 DRIVERS OF URBAN GROWTH 18 P8 Support private-sector development
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Hoek Looking Back
    FISH HOEK LOOKING BACK by Joy Cobern Printed & Published by Fish Hoek Printing & Publishing cc P.O. Box 22165 Fish Hoek 7975 First Published 2003 1 PREFACE This book is not meant to be a full history of Fish Hoek but is intended for those living here or visiting who wish to know more about the area. I hope you enjoy it and end up knowing a little more about Fish Hoek. There are many people who have helped me and I would particularly like to thank Joe and Simone Frylinck, who really thought I could do it, Ethel may Gillard, for sharing her vast store of local information and fascinating reminiscences, Michael Walker and Clive Wakeford for encouragement and advice. To anyone else who thinks that they ought to be on that list, thank you too! 2 INDEX 1. Peers Cave……………………………………………………… 6 2. The First Explorations of the Fish Hoek Valley………………. 11 3. The Fish Hoek Farm……………………………………………15 4. The Early Days of the Village………………………………….. 23 5. Water and Electricity………………………………………….... 28 6. The Railway Comes to Fish Hoek……………………………... 33 7. Vischoek, Vishoek or Fish Hoek?................................................ 39 8. Beach Development…………………………………………….. 41 9. Beach Controversies……………………………………………. 48 10 Fish Hoek Main Road…………………………………………. 54 11. Early Businesses………………………………………………. 64 12. Local Government…………………………………………….. 70 13. The War Years…………………………………………………. 77 14. The Steps and Lanes…………………………………………... 81 15. Our Local Newspapers………………………………………... 85 16. The Battle of the Bottles………………………………………. 89 3 Fish Hoek 1922 Fish Hoek 1933 Fish Hoek 1947 4 1. Peers Cave Although the first plots in Fish Hoek were only sold in 1918 there have been people in the Fish Hoek Valley for many thousands of years, but it was only in the 1920's that the early history of the valley was uncovered.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Hoek Valley Ratepayers and Residents Association
    FISH HOEK VALLEY RATEPAYERS AND RESIDENTS ASSOCIATION CHAIR, FHVRRA: Brian Youngblood NOVEMBER 2017 Tel: 021 782 1950 Email: [email protected] With permission of photographer: B. Suter NOTICE OF QUARTERLY GENERAL MEETING Venue: FISH HOEK CIVIC CENTRE. Date: THURSDAY 23 NOVEMBER 2017. Time: 19:30 MEETING AGENDA 1. WELCOME, Introductions and Apologies. 2. ADMIN: Minutes of the 24 August 2017 QGM & Constitution’s Objectives 3. GUEST SPEAKERS: DONALD MOORE: The Fish Hoek Liquor Condition of Title GIDEON MORRIS: Western Cape Liquor Act: Introduction JUDGE DEON VAN ZYL: Western Cape Liquor Act: Applications and Appeals 4. COUNCILLOR’s REPORT 5. CHAIRPERSON’s REPORT 6. GENERAL REFRESHMENTS WILL BE SERVED AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE MEETING FHVRRA SUBSCRIPTIONS Annual Subscriptions due on 1 January 2018 are R70 per household. The current status of your subs is clearly indicated in the e-mail or hard copy addressed to you. Members are invited to make voluntary additional donations. Members unable to afford the subscription fees are advised to contact the Association's Chairperson (Tel: 021-782-1950), in full confidence and no obligation, to discuss a reduced fee. Details of our bank account for Bank deposits or EFT payments: A/C Name: FHVRRA. A/C No: 374203091. Bank: Standard – Fish Hoek. Bank Code for deposits: 036009. Bank Code for EFT payments: 051001. Indicate: “subs-your initials-your surname” in the payment reference. Add R25 for cheque and cash deposits at the bank to cover bank fees. Subs can also be posted to P.O. Box 22125 Fish Hoek 7974, or paid at the following establishments: A.P.Jones (1st floor), Cape Coastal Property Group (Main Road) and Reproclinic (Valyland).
    [Show full text]
  • The Southwestern Cape During the Last Millennium
    The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgementTown of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Cape Published by the University ofof Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University NATURAL AND HUMAN INDUCED LATE QUATERNARY ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE ON THE NOORDHOEK VALLEY, CAPE TOWN, SOUTH AFRICA BY EU AKUNJI Town Submitted in fulfilment of the requirementsCape for the degree of MASTERS OF ARTS of Department of Environmental and Geographical Science UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN University Rondebosch 7701 South Africa August 2004 THE NOORDHOEK VALLEY ~~~==--~--~-- ------------------~ Town Cape of FRONTISPIECE: lake Michelle and the twin Wildevoelvleis in the background University(Photo: E. Akunji, July 2004) ABSTRACT This research project attempts to determine the relative influences of climate. sea level changes and human activities during the period of sediment accumulation in the Noordhoek basin in the southwestern Cape. South Africa. The research relies on lacustrine sedimentary deposits and their compositional changes as evidence of the dynamic depositional environments from which environmental conditions are inferred. Data on spatial changes on land surfaces have also been employed to complement the sedimentary chronology from catchments beyond historic records. Assessment of the extent of human influence on the Noordhoek basin has been achieved through comparison with the pristine conditions found on the Cape Nature Reserve. Analysis of dated sediment cores from the Noordhoek valley and the Cape Peninsula Nature reserve has facilitated the reconstruction of major environmental changes for the late Pleistocene and Holocene periods.
    [Show full text]
  • The Endemic Flora of the Cape Peninsula
    Cape Peninsula The endemic flora of the Cape Peninsula Many of the plants that grow in this well-known plant and people hotspot are found in this small area and nowhere else. by Nick Helme, Nick Helme Botanical Surveys, and Terry Trinder-Smith, Bolus Herbarium, University of Cape Town The Cape Peninsula is an area of exceptional plant diversity, yet no list of the 161 endemic plant taxa that occur here has ever been puplished. We decided to set this right*. To start, we defined the Cape Peninsula as the area west of a line connecting Paarden Island to Muizenberg, including a small part of the western edge of the area known as the Cape Flats. The area is characterized by the presence of the Cape Peninsula mountain chain and this extends from Signal Hill and Lion's Head in the north to Cape Point in the south. The total land area is 471 km2 (47 100 hal and some 24 000 ha are now formally or contractually conserved within the Table Mountain National Park, which includes 80% of the actual mountain chain. Studies of this nature are bedeviled by taxonomic (see glossary) revisions and TOP: View of the Peninsula mountain chain from changes (particularly in the genera Erica, eliffonia and the mesembs) but about Klawer Valley above Simon's Town, with Table 2 285 plant species are known to be indigenous to the Cape Peninsula, which Mountain in the distance and winter fog covering the Cape Flats and the lowlands surrounding False means that the Peninsula has the greatest concentration of plant species (per unit Bay.
    [Show full text]