How the FDA Manages Drug Safety with Black Box Warnings, Use Restrictions, and Drug Removal, with Attention to Gastrointestinal Medications

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

How the FDA Manages Drug Safety with Black Box Warnings, Use Restrictions, and Drug Removal, with Attention to Gastrointestinal Medications nature publishing group THE RED SECTION 501 How the FDA Manages Drug Safety With Black Box Warnings, Use Restrictions, and Drug Removal, With Attention to Gastrointestinal Medications Eli D. Ehrenpreis, MD1, Arthur A. Ciociola, PhD2, Prasad M. Kulkarni, MD, FACG3 and the FDA-Related Matters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology Am J Gastroenterol 2012;107:501–504; doi:10.1038/ajg.2011.449 Introduction the FDA developed additional activities to ies to define and clarify adverse events. A Physicians play a key role in helping the enhance medical product safety (4). common strategy involves requiring man- Food and Drug Administration (FDA) The FDA evaluates all medical products ufacturers to change drug labeling, also monitor the safety of medical products. before and after approval. During product known as “prescribing information” or the Physicians follow the principle of Hip- development, the manufacturer performs “package insert.” A black box warning on pocrates, primum non nocere (“first, do in vitro, animal, and human studies. Pre- a drug—the most serious type of label- no harm”). Some adverse drug reac- market testing takes place in a sequential ing change—is designed to call attention tions (ADRs) are expected due to known fashion. Typically, testing begins with nor- to serious or life-threatening risk. While mechanisms of action. Others may be mal volunteers and then proceeds to stud- the FDA is considering labeling changes idiosyncratic or not previously identified ies to define the lowest effective dose, then for a drug, it may release an Early Com- and therefore may not be preventable. The to define patient populations with the opti- munication About an Ongoing Safety FDA’s post-approval safety surveillance mal risk–benefit profile. However, because Review. After the review is completed, the activities are an attempt to control these the total number of subjects evaluated is FDA may issue a Public Health Advisory unexpected ADRs. relatively small (<10,000), rare ADRs may providing updated drug safety informa- not be detected before approval. The num- tion. The FDA may also require the drug Background ber of patients with comorbid conditions manufacturer to send a “Dear Healthcare The FDA is responsible for assuring the for whom safety data are collected is usu- Professional” letter outlining safety issues safety, efficacy, and security of human ally insufficient to allow for a robust risk with advice for corrective action. A medi- and veterinary drugs, biological prod- evaluation. As a result, safety information cation guide, an instruction sheet provided ucts, medical devices, foods, cosmetics, collected in the postmarketing period is of to the patient by the pharmacist, may be and radiation-emitting products (1–5). In considerable importance (13). The FDA used. If these educational strategies are 1938, Congress passed the Federal Food, launched the MedWatch Safety Informa- inadequate, additional management tools Drug, and Cosmetic Act after elixir of tion and Adverse Event Reporting System are required. These Risk Evaluation and sulfanilamide (containing ethylene gly- (AERS) in 1993 to stimulate voluntary Minimization Strategies are designed to col) caused 107 deaths (5–8). The act reporting of ADRs by health-care profes- ensure that the benefits of the product out- required companies to prove a product’s sionals and patients. weigh patient risk (4). They may also limit safety (2,9,10). Phocomelia and other birth who prescribes or dispenses drugs and defects were observed following maternal How the FDA manages the safety of a require physician training, laboratory test- use of thalidomide, prompting passage of drug ing, or registration and tracking of patients the Kefauver–Harris Amendment in 1962. If the FDA identifies a previously unrec- receiving the drug. This required pharmaceutical manufac- ognized safety issue, a variety of tools are At times, further restriction or removal turers to report all ADRs directly to the available to keep effective drugs and devices of a product from the market will be man- FDA (11,12). In 2007, following a series on the market while reducing risk of harm. dated. However, if it is determined that a of highly publicized drug withdrawals, The FDA may request further clinical stud- drug is longer safe to remain on the mar- 1Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, Highland Park Hospital, NorthShore University Health System, Chicago, Illinois, USA; 2Pharmaceutical Regulatory Strategy, Process, and Policy, Bausch+Lomb, Madison, New Jersey, USA; 3University of South Florida Physician’s Group, Tampa, Florida, USA. Correspondence: Eli D. Ehrenpreis, MD, Highland Park Hospital, NorthShore University HealthSystem, 777 Park Avenue, West Highland Park, Illinois 60035, USA. E-mail: ehrenpreis@ gipharm.net © 2012 by the American College of Gastroenterology The American Journal of GASTROENTEROLOGY 502 THE RED SECTION ket, the FDA will request that the product is tions for gastrointestinal conditions that Tegaserod withdrawn. The FDA has the legal author- have undergone safety alerts. Tegaserod is a 5-HT4 receptor partial ago- ity to immediately withdraw authorization nist manufactured by Novartis under the to market a drug in the United States. In Metoclopramide name Zelnorm. Activated 5-HT4 recep- extreme situations, products may be seized Metoclopramide is a dopamine D2 recep- tors in the gastrointestinal tract stimulate to prohibit further sales. Withdrawal of a tor antagonist in the chemoreceptor intestinal peristalsis and secretion and drug is communicated to the public by the trigger zone as well as a mixed 5-HT3 inhibit visceral sensitivity. Tegaserod was manufacturer using normal media chan- receptor antagonist/5-HT4 receptor ago- approved for the management of abdomi- nels. The Recalls, Market Withdrawals, nist and cholinomimetic. Metoclopramide nal discomfort, bloating and constipa- and Safety Alerts website (http://www.fda. increases antral contractions and small- tion associated with IBS (July 2002), and gov/Safety/Recalls/default.htm) also gives bowel peristalsis and is a treatment for chronic idiopathic constipation (August information about withdrawn drug prod- nausea and vomiting. It has also been used 2004). In March 2007, the FDA suspended ucts. The FDA also provides MedWatch as a prokinetic agent. Although a variety marketing and sales of tegaserod because Safety Alerts and Drug Safety Podcasts and of ADRs are associated with metoclo- a safety analysis found increased myocar- publishes a Drug Safety Newsletter. Pre- pramide, the development of tardive dys- dial infarction, stroke (cerebrovascular scribing information is available on Dai- kinesia (TD) prompted an FDA black box accident), and unstable angina in patients lyMed of the National Library of Medicine warning in February 2009 (14). Chronic treated with tegaserod compared with pla- (http://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/ treatment with metoclopramide can cause cebo. Subsequent observational studies about.cfm). TD, characterized by involuntary move- did not concur (18). In July 2007, the FDA These regulatory actions are based on the ments of the extremities, lips, tongue, and permitted the restricted use of tegaserod evaluation of postmarketing ADRs. Data face and eyes. TD is associated with cen- under a treatment–investigational new are obtained from a number of sources, trally acting dopamine blockers, includ- drug (T-IND) protocol for IBS with con- including the mandatory safety reporting ing phenothiazines (e.g., thorazine and stipation and chronic idiopathic constipa- from the manufacturer, the AERS, pub- prochlorperazine). Development of TD is tion in women younger than 55. Novartis lished literature, and clinical and non- related to the duration of metoclopramide subsequently abandoned this T-IND. Zel- clinical studies. Unfortunately, fewer than use and its cumulative dose. TD has no norm may be available in emergency situa- 10% of all adverse safety events with medi- known treatment and is often irreversible. tions that are immediately life-threatening cal products are reported to the FDA (13). The elderly, especially women, are at high- or that qualify for hospitalization. Physi- The AERS system has also been publicly est risk. The black box warning states that cians with patients who may qualify for criticized for taking years to understand prolonged treatment with metoclopramide emergency treatment with Zelnorm may the risk profile of a drug and delaying (longer than 12 weeks) should be avoided contact the FDA’s Division of Drug Infor- removal of products from the market. In in all but rare cases in which the therapeu- mation at [email protected]. an effort to improve the postmarketing tic benefit outweighs the risks of develop- surveillance, the FDA has mandated that ing TD. Cisapride drug advertisements encourage patients Cisapride, a serotonin-4 (5-HT4) receptor to report ADRs. In addition, the FDA has Alosetron agonist (and partial 5-HT3 antagonist), now made the reporting form simpler and Alosetron is an antagonist of serotonergic promotes gastric motility by enhancing more accessible to patients and health-care 5-HT3 receptors of the enteric nervous release of acetylcholine at the myenteric providers. The FDA also initiated devel- system. Alosetron diminishes gastro- plexus. Cisapride (marketed as Propulsid) opment of the Sentinel System in 2008, a intestinal motility, decreases noxious was used between 1993 and 1999 for the nationwide electronic system for postmar- sensations, slows colonic
Recommended publications
  • FDA Warns About an Increased Risk of Serious Pancreatitis with Irritable Bowel Drug Viberzi (Eluxadoline) in Patients Without a Gallbladder
    FDA warns about an increased risk of serious pancreatitis with irritable bowel drug Viberzi (eluxadoline) in patients without a gallbladder Safety Announcement [03-15-2017] The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is warning that Viberzi (eluxadoline), a medicine used to treat irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D), should not be used in patients who do not have a gallbladder. An FDA review found these patients have an increased risk of developing serious pancreatitis that could result in hospitalization or death. Pancreatitis may be caused by spasm of a certain digestive system muscle in the small intestine. As a result, we are working with the Viberzi manufacturer, Allergan, to address these safety concerns. Patients should talk to your health care professional about how to control your symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D), particularly if you do not have a gallbladder. The gallbladder is an organ that stores bile, one of the body’s digestive juices that helps in the digestion of fat. Stop taking Viberzi right away and get emergency medical care if you develop new or worsening stomach-area or abdomen pain, or pain in the upper right side of your stomach-area or abdomen that may move to your back or shoulder. This pain may occur with nausea and vomiting. These may be symptoms of pancreatitis, an inflammation of the pancreas, an organ important in digestion; or spasm of the sphincter of Oddi, a muscular valve in the small intestine that controls the flow of digestive juices to the gut. Health care professionals should not prescribe Viberzi in patients who do not have a gallbladder and should consider alternative treatment options in these patients.
    [Show full text]
  • Therapeutic Class Overview Irritable Bowel Syndrome Agents
    Therapeutic Class Overview Irritable Bowel Syndrome Agents Therapeutic Class Overview/Summary: This review will focus on agents used for the treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS).1-5 IBS is a gastrointestinal syndrome characterized primarily by non-specific chronic abdominal pain, usually described as a cramp-like sensation, and abnormal bowel habits, either constipation or diarrhea, in which there is no organic cause. Other common gastrointestinal symptoms may include gastroesophageal reflux, dysphagia, early satiety, intermittent dyspepsia and nausea. Patients may also experience a wide range of non-gastrointestinal symptoms. Some notable examples include sexual dysfunction, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, increased urinary frequency/urgency and fibromyalgia-like symptoms.6 IBS is defined by one of four subtypes. IBS with constipation (IBS-C) is the presence of hard or lumpy stools with ≥25% of bowel movements and loose or watery stools with <25% of bowel movements. When IBS is associated with diarrhea (IBS-D) loose or watery stools are present with ≥25% of bowel movements and hard or lumpy stools are present with <25% of bowel movements. Mixed IBS (IBS-M) is defined as the presence of hard or lumpy stools with ≥25% and loose or water stools with ≥25% of bowel movements. Final subtype, or unsubtyped, is all other cases of IBS that do not fall into the other classes. Pharmacological therapy for IBS depends on subtype.7 While several over-the-counter or off-label prescription agents are used for the treatment of IBS, there are currently only two agents approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of IBS-C and three agents approved by the FDA for IBS-D.
    [Show full text]
  • Prophylactic Antiemetic Therapy with Ondansetron, Granisetron and Metoclopramide in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Under GA
    JK SCIENCE ORIGINAL ARTICLE Prophylactic Antiemetic Therapy with Ondansetron, Granisetron and Metoclopramide in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Under GA Vishal Gupta, Renu Wakhloo, Anjali Mehta, Satya Dev Gupta Abstract The aim of the present study was to compare the antiemetic effect of intravenous Granisetron, Ondansetron & Metoclopramide in a randomized blinded study for prophylaxis of post operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anaesthesia. 60 patients (ASA I & II) undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anaesthesia were randomly allocated into three equal groups (n=20). Emetic episodes in first 24 hours were recorded and compared in different study groups. Results were analyzed. Minimal emetic episodes were observed in early post-operative period (1-12hrs) in patients who had received intravenous granisetron in comparison to ondansetron and metoclopramide. However, after 12 hours emesis free periods were statistically insignificant between group A and B while patients in group C had no antiemetic effect. Keywords Post Operative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV), Granisetron, Ondensetron, Metoclopramide Introduction The most common and distressing symptoms, which vascular anastomoses and increased intracranial follow anaesthesia and surgery, are pain and emesis. The pressure(4). The anaesthetic consequences are aspiration syndrome of nausea, retching and vomiting is known as pneumonitis and discomfort in recovery. For institutions 'sickness' and each part of it can be distinguished as a there is increased financial burden because of increased separate entity (1). PONV (post operative nausea and nursing care, delayed discharge from Phase I and II vomiting) has been characterized as big 'little problem(2) recovery units and unexpected admissions. Hence, and has been a common complication for both in patients prophylactic antiemetic therapy is needed for all these and out patients undergoing virtually all types of surgical patients.
    [Show full text]
  • Antidepressants for Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders
    Antidepressants for the treatment of Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders Commonly IBS, constipation, diarrhea, functional abdominal pain and esophageal hypersensitivity Document adapted from literature available from the UNC Center for Functional GI & Motility Disorders What are Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders (FGIDs)? There are many different FGIDs (over 20), but among them, IBS is the most common. FGIDs are characterized by abnormal changes in the movement of muscles throughout the intestines (motility abnormality), an increase in the sensations produced by digestive tract activity (visceral hypersensitivity), and brain-gut dysfunction, especially in the brain’s ability to regulate painful signals from the GI tract. People with IBS have an increased awareness and interpretation of these activities as being abnormal. Motility Abnormality Visceral Hypersensitivity Brain-Gut Dysfunction Instead of normal muscular People with IBS, and other When nerve impulses from the gut reach activity (motility) during digestion, FGIDs, may experience an the brain, they may be experienced as people with IBS may experience increased sensitivity in the more severe or less severe based on the painful spasms and cramping. If nerves of the GI tract. This can regulatory activity of the brain-gut axis. motility is too fast it may produce happen after a GI infection or Signals of pain or discomfort travel from diarrhea and if it is too slow it operation which causes injury the intestines back to the brain. The may result in constipation. Motility to the nerves. This produces a brain usually has the ability to “turn abnormalities may be associated lower pain threshold for normal down” the pain by sending signals that with: cramping, belching, digestive sensations, leading to block nerve impulses produced in the GI urgency, and abdominal pain and discomfort.
    [Show full text]
  • Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Diarrhea
    Clinical Pharmacy Program Guidelines for Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Diarrhea Program Prior Authorization Medication Lotronex (alosetron), Viberzi (eluxadoline) Markets in Scope Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Maryland, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, New York EPP, Pennsylvania- CHIP, Rhode Island, South Carolina Issue Date 3/2013 Pharmacy and 3/2021 Therapeutics Approval Date Effective Date 6/2021 1. Background: Lotronex (alosetron) is indicated only for use in women with severe diarrhea- predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) who have: chronic IBS, had anatomical or biochemical abnormalities of the gastrointestinal tract excluded, and not responded adequately to conventional therapy. Viberzi (eluxadoline) is a mu-opioid receptor agonist, indicated for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D) in adults. 2. Coverage Criteria: A. Lotronex 1. Initial Authorization a. Lotronex will be approved based on all of the following criteria: (1) Diagnosis of severe diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) -AND- (2) Symptoms for at least 6 months -AND- (3) Patient was female at birth -AND- Confidential and Proprietary, © 2021 UnitedHealthcare Services Inc. 1 (4) Age greater than or equal to 18 years -AND- (5) History of failure, contraindication, or intolerance to a tricyclic antidepressant (e.g. amitriptyline) Authorization will be issued for 12 months. 2. Reauthorization a. Lotronex will be approved based on the following criterion: (1) Documentation of positive clinical response to Lotronex therapy Authorization will be issued for 12 months. B. Viberzi 1. Initial Authorization a. Viberzi will be approved based on all of the following criteria: (1) Diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D) -AND- (2) History of failure, contraindication, or intolerance to a tricyclic antidepressant (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Efficacy of Eluxadoline in Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Diarrhea
    This is a repository copy of Efficacy of Eluxadoline in Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/156693/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Black, CJ, Houghton, LA and Ford, AC orcid.org/0000-0001-6371-4359 (2020) Efficacy of Eluxadoline in Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 115 (3). pp. 483-484. ISSN 0002-9270 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000518 © The American College of Gastroenterology 2020. All Rights Reserved. This is an author produced version of correspondence published in The American Journal of Gastroenterology. Uploaded in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Black et al Page 1 of 11 TITLE PAGE Title: Relative Efficacy of Eluxadoline in Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Authors: Christopher J. Black1, 2, Lesley A. Houghton, 2, Alexander C. Ford1, 2. 1Leeds Gastroenterology Institute, St.
    [Show full text]
  • Neuromodulators for Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders (Disorders of Gutlbrain Interaction): a Rome Foundation Working Team Report Douglas A
    Gastroenterology 2018;154:1140–1171 SPECIAL REPORT Neuromodulators for Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders (Disorders of GutLBrain Interaction): A Rome Foundation Working Team Report Douglas A. Drossman,1,2 Jan Tack,3 Alexander C. Ford,4,5 Eva Szigethy,6 Hans Törnblom,7 and Lukas Van Oudenhove8 1Center for Functional Gastrointestinal and Motility Disorders, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; 2Center for Education and Practice of Biopsychosocial Care and Drossman Gastroenterology, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; 3Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; 4Leeds Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom; 5Leeds Gastroenterology Institute, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom; 6Departments of Psychiatry and Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; 7Departments of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; and 8Laboratory for BrainÀGut Axis Studies, Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium BACKGROUND & AIMS: Central neuromodulators (antide- summary information and guidelines for the use of central pressants, antipsychotics, and other central nervous neuromodulators in the treatment of chronic gastrointestinal systemÀtargeted medications) are increasingly used for treat- symptoms and FGIDs. Further studies are needed to confirm ment
    [Show full text]
  • 2015.09 IBS Drug Class Review.Pdf
    Drug Class Review Agents Indicated in the Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome 56:92 GI Drugs, Miscellaneous Alosetron (Lotronex®) Eluxadoline (Viberzi®) Linaclotide (Linzess®) Lubiprostone (Amitiza®) Tegaserod (Zelnorm®) Final Report September 2015 Review prepared by: Melissa Archer, PharmD, Clinical Pharmacist Irene Pan, PharmD Candidate 2016 Chelsey Hancock, PharmD Candidate 2016 Carin Steinvoort, PharmD, Clinical Pharmacist Gary Oderda, PharmD, MPH, Professor University of Utah College of Pharmacy Copyright © 2015 by University of Utah College of Pharmacy Salt Lake City, Utah. All rights reserved. 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 4 Table 1. Comparison of the Agents Indicated in the Treatment of IBS ................................. 5 Disease Overview ........................................................................................................................ 6 Table 2. Summary of IBS Treatment Options ........................................................................ 8 Table 3. IBS Disease Staging System .................................................................................... 11 Table 4. Most Current Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Treatment of IBS ..................... 13 Pharmacology ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Viberzi™ (Eluxadoline) – Safety Update
    Viberzi™ (eluxadoline) – Safety update • On March 15, 2017, the FDA announced that Allergan’s Viberzi (eluxadoline) should not be used in patients who do not have a gallbladder. • Patients who do not have a gallbladder who are taking Viberzi for irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea (IBS-D) have an increased risk of developing pancreatitis, sphincter of Oddi spasm, and death. • Symptoms of pancreatitis have occurred with just one or two doses of Viberzi at the recommended dosage for patients who do not have a gallbladder (75 mg) and who do not consume alcohol. • Viberzi is a schedule IV controlled substance indicated in adults for the treatment of IBS-D. — IBS-D affects the large intestine and causes cramping, abdominal pain, bloating, gas, and diarrhea. Viberzi works by decreasing bowel contractions, which leads to less diarrhea. • Healthcare providers should not prescribe Viberzi to patients who do not have a gallbladder and should consider alternative over-the-counter (OTC) or prescription medicines indicated to treat IBS- D and its related symptoms in these patients. — OTC examples include bismuth subsalicylate (eg, Kaopectate®, Pepto-Bismol™), Imodium® (loperamide) and Gas-X® (simethicone). Prescription Lomotil® (diphenoxylate/atropine) may be used to treat diarrhea. — Other prescription medications indicated to treat IBS-D include Lotronex® (alosetron) and Xifaxan® (rifaximin). — Refer to individual drug labels for specific indication information. • Patients should stop taking Viberzi right away and seek immediate emergency care if they experience symptoms of pancreatitis or spasm of the sphincter of Oddi, such as new or worsening abdominal pain, or pain in the upper right side of the abdomen that radiates to the back or shoulder.
    [Show full text]
  • Drug Interactions with Tobacco Smoke: Implications for Patient Care
    Savvy Psychopharmacology Drug interactions with tobacco smoke: Implications for patient care Martha P. Fankhauser, MS Pharm, FASHP, BCPP rs. C, age 51, experiences exacerbated setron, and zolpidem). When Mrs. C stops asthma and difficulty breathing and smoking while in the hospital, she could M is admitted to a non-smoking hospi- experience higher serum concentrations and tal. She also has chronic obstructive pulmonary adverse effects of these medications. If Mrs. disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hyperten- C resumes smoking after bring discharged, sion, hypercholesterolemia, hypothyroidism, metabolism and clearance of any medica- gastroesophageal reflux disease, overactive tions started while she was hospitalized that Vicki L. Ellingrod, bladder, muscle spasms, fibromyalgia, bipolar are substrates of CYP1A2 enzymes could be PharmD, BCPP, FCCP disorder, insomnia, and nicotine and caffeine increased, which could lead to reduced effi- Series Editor dependence. She takes 19 prescribed and over- cacy and poor clinical outcomes. the-counter medications, drinks up to 8 cups of coffee per day, and smokes 20 to 30 cigarettes Pharmacokinetic effects per day. In the emergency room, she receives Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in to- albuterol/ipratropium inhalation therapy to help bacco smoke induce hepatic CYP1A1, 1A2, her breathing and a 21-mg nicotine replacement and possibly 2E1 isoenzymes.6-12 CYP1A2 patch to avoid nicotine withdrawal. is a hepatic enzyme responsible for me- In the United States, 19% of adults smoke Practice Points cigarettes.1 Heavy tobacco smoking and • Tobacco smokers often are treated with nicotine dependence are common among medications that are metabolized by psychiatric patients and contribute to high- hepatic cytochrome (CYP) 1A2 enzymes.
    [Show full text]
  • Hepatic Encephalopathy
    Hepatic Encephalopathy 437 Fernando Court • Glendale, CA 91204 • MAIN: 818.309.2884 • FAX: 818.309.1704 • www.deltadrugs.com PATIENT INFORMATION Patient Name: Patient SSN#: Address: Address, City, State, Zip Code Phone #: 2nd Phone #: Date of Birth: Gender: Male Female Weight (lbs): Height (in.): Allergies: Primary Insurance: Secondary Insurance: ID#: Phone #: ID#: Phone #: FAX COPY OF INSURANCE CARD (FRONT & BACK) CLINICAL INFORMATION ICD-10 Diagnosis Prior Medication History K72.90 Hepatic Encephalopathy Dicyclomia Antisposmodic Imodium K58.0 Irritable Bowel Syndrome-D Alosetron Alvimopan Asacol Atropine/Diphenoxylate Comorbidities: Kaopectate Lactulose Loperamide Mesalamine Metoclopramide Pepto-Bismol Failed due to: Failed to treat diarrhea Nausea Vomiting Severe diarrhea Severe gas Medication Reconciliation: Gastric reflux FAX COPY OF ALL RELATED CLINICAL/LAB INFO MEDICATION STRENGTH DIRECTIONS QTY REFILLS XIFAXAN® 550 mg 1 tablet by mouth twice a day 60 2 Ship to: Physician’s Office Patient’s Home | Dispense As Written PHYSICIAN INFORMATION Physician Name: Contact: NPI#: Address: Address, City, State, Zip Code Phone #: Fax#: Email: Physician’s Signature: Date: I AUTHORIZE DELTA DRUGS AND ITS REPRESENTATIVES TO ACT AS AN AGENT TO INITIATE AND EXECUTE THE INSURANCE PRIOR AUTHORIZATION PROCESS. PRIVACY NOTICE: This communication may contain non-public or legally privileged information intended for the sole use of the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately via fax or by telephone at the number stated above and delete all copies of this communication, including any attachments, without reading or creating copies of them. If you are the intended recipient, you must secure the contents of this communication in accordance with all applicable state or federal requirements related to the privacy and security of information, including the HIPAA Privacy guidelines.
    [Show full text]
  • Soma® ) to Alosetron (Lotronex® ): a New Treatment Be Restricted for Irritable Bowel Syndrome
    OREGON DUR BOARD NEWSLETTER© © Copyright 2000 Oregon State University All Rights Reserved Vol. 2 No. 4 http://pharmacy.orst.edu/ Fall 2000 Quantities of Carisoprodol (Soma® ) to Alosetron (Lotronex® ): A New Treatment be Restricted for Irritable Bowel Syndrome By: Helen Varley, B. Pharm., Dip. Clin. Pharm., M.R.Pharm.S., Joseph By: Dean Haxby, Pharm.D., Cisco Jorgensen, B.S. Pharmacy Clerkship Jordan, Pharm.D., & Paul Bascom, M..D., FACP, Director, Comfort Care Student & Helen Varley, B. Pharm., Dip. Clin. Pharm., M.R.Pharm.S. Team, OHSU Division of General Internal Medicine Introduction he Oregon DUR Board has recommended to the State of Oregon Office Tof Medical Assistance Programs (OMAP) that carisoprodol (Soma® ) be rritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is a common chronic gastrointestinal subject to prior authorization after the dispensing of 56 tablets in 90 days. Idisorder. IBS is a “functional” GI disorder, not explained by structural or biochemical abnormalities. The predominant symptoms of IBS are Carisoprodol drug abuse is a public health problem nationwide, with many abdominal pain plus diarrhea, constipation or both. Other symptoms may cases of overdose reported to poison control centers. A DUR Board report include cramping, gas, abdominal distension and nausea.1 Pain often is suggests carisoprodol is continuing to be used outside recommended worsened soon after eating, and improved by having a bowel movement or guidelines in Oregon. The routine review suggested that 13.5% of passing gas. Symptoms tend to wax and wane, and can vary from mildly carisoprodol prescriptions were dosed at greater than 1400mg per day, annoying to debilitating.2 The etiology of IBS is poorly understood, based on the day’s supply and the number of tablets dispensed.
    [Show full text]